Guest workers on a special operation: the first consequences
Source: yakutsk.ru
"Two citizens of one of the CIS countries"
On the morning of October 15, eleven Bryansk volunteers were shot at one of the military training grounds in the Belgorod Region. Fifteen more were taken to hospitals with injuries of varying severity. The very first thought was that a sabotage group of nationalists made their way to the training ground. Moreover, the Valuysky district, where the tragedy happened, borders on the Kharkov region. Later clarifications came - the fire was opened by "persons who voluntarily expressed a desire to participate in a special military operation." Only not citizens of Russia, but persons with passports of "one of the CIS countries." Before the announcement of the official version, it is not entirely correct to speak unambiguously about the nationality of the terrorists, but with a high degree of probability they were Tajiks. A couple of shooters simply deployed a machine gun (or machine guns) and opened fire on their colleagues almost point-blank. They beat until the lieutenant shot the terrorists.
Someone said that yesterday's guest workers will not be able to show themselves at the front? Please showed only in the interests of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Heroes of Ukraine, probably, will be awarded posthumously. A bitter truth, the realization of which comes through the dead guys who did not even reach the front. The truth, which does not completely cancel questions about the tragedy.
Source: u74.ru
First of all, if something like the French "Foreign Legion" is planned, then why are there volunteers with Russian passports at the legionnaires' training? If a citizen of Tajikistan, Uzbekistan or Kyrgyzstan is ready to sign a contract in exchange for a simplified citizenship, but, probably, it is most logical to form separate battalions from such volunteers. This is true for many reasons. Firstly, the language barrier, which no one has canceled. Let's be frank, few of the guest workers truly assimilated in Russia. Even having lived more than one year in the country. Secondly, immigrants from the Central Asian republics require a thorough check before admission to arms. In this environment, it is easiest for Ukrainian intelligence to recruit supporters. Often, the secret services know only what the visitor was doing in Russia. What he hunted in his homeland, what groups he joined and whose ideas he professes, often remains in the shadows. Therefore, if there is already a need to attract foreign labor with weapons in hand, then let these be mono-national units. At least the scumbags will not have a reason to become a martyr. It is much easier for special services to carry out preventive work in such international brigades than to look for potential terrorists along the entire front. The third reason why it is impossible to “dissolve” representatives of national minorities among the fighters of the titular nation is the complexity of interethnic interaction. Under such an ornate phrase lies a simple fact - guest workers and Russians do not always show tolerance for each other. For various reasons, of course. But when a weapon, especially an automatic one, appears in the hands of one of the participants in the conflict, everything can end in tragedy. What we observed on October 15 in the Belgorod region.
Again, all of the above is true only in case of emergency. When a surprisingly simple scheme is implemented, we gather a crowd of guest workers and distribute weapons to them. To do this, probably, the front should lie not on the state border, but somewhere in the Moscow region. Is the situation on the fronts of the NMD so critical that it is so open to take risks, arming not to understand whom? Definitely not.
Back to construction sites
First of all, it is necessary to understand how much the representatives of Central Asia sympathize with or at least understand the need for a special operation. They do not understand and do not want to understand from the word at all. Guest workers who want to get citizenship and easy money through the NWO are people of a new generation, for whom Russia is just a place of comfortable living. Here they build their business and give birth to diasporas, which often transform into criminal gangs. Russians with guests from Central Asia were born in different countries and this is a fundamental difference. In the Soviet Union, before the "parade of sovereignties" it was different - every Tajik, Uzbek, Turkmen or Kyrgyz felt part of a single nation. Let many-sided, but united nation. Therefore, in Afghanistan, the Belgorod tragedy was impossible in principle.
The level of support of the countries of Central Asia for the Russian special operation is evidenced by the terms of imprisonment that the republics threaten their citizens with. According to the laws of Tajikistan, volunteers qualify as mercenaries, and this is from 12 to 20 years in prison. In Uzbekistan, it is more loyal - from five to ten years in prison. Ten years threatens the Kyrgyz, who dared to sign up as volunteers for a Russian special operation. In this clip of support for a strategic partner is the widespread blocking of Russian MIR cards by the countries of Central Asia.
Resonant in connection with the shooting at the Belgorod training ground, the words of the President of Tajikistan Emomali Rahmon at the summit "Central Asia - Russia". In his opinion, Russia does not pay enough attention to the republics of Central Asia. In particular, our Minister Lavrov did not come to the recently held forum "Tajikistan - Russia", although he was invited. The Kremlin limited itself to deputy heads of relevant ministries. Quoting Rahmon:
“We were made so that we are countries that ... I don’t know. Yes, we are small nations, we are not 100-200 million, but we have story, culture, we love, we want to be respected. Do not need anything. Respected."
And finally, the summit took place on October 14, 2022.Indeed, in Russia there are more than a million labor migrants from Tajikistan alone. And this is presented as effective assistance to our country. They say that if it were not for guest workers, then there would simply be no one to build and sweep the streets in Russia. Let us leave this question to overly exalted liberals and consider the reverse situation. What will happen if the Tajiks suddenly decide to return home? The country will instantly lose up to 43 percent of its GDP, and will also receive a million-odd young citizens for whom there is no work and is not expected. It seems unnecessary to explain what this threatens Emomali Rahmon himself. A typical guest worker is a person who could not be useful in his homeland. For various reasons, but the fact remains. If he was not needed in the country, then why did we get the idea that we would need him in the Russian army.
Now let's touch on the combat effectiveness of units recruited from guest workers. Most of the visitors from Central Asia are between the ages of 25 and 40, that is, they could have time to serve in the national armies. The level of training, with all due respect, is not the highest. At best, it remained at the turn of the 70-80s of the last century. The vast majority of visitors also do not have combat experience. Is it possible to prepare such a volunteer for the realities of SVO in a month of retraining? Especially when his motivation is solely money and Russian citizenship. And also a peculiar attitude towards mercenaries in Ukrainian captivity. Even the above solution to the problem of the formation of international divisions looks half-hearted. How will volunteer battalions of immigrants from Central Asia behave in battle? Will they become weak links in the defense? What part of the volunteers will come to the army with the ideas of Wahhabism? It is highly desirable that the military leadership receive answers to these questions before sending units to the front.
Information