Why Rosneft buys TNK-BP

84

Loud news the last hours: the state oil corporation "Rosneft" agreed to buy out the company TNK-BP from its shareholders.

Oil is always politics. Big oil is big politics. And after the purchase, Rosneft will become the world's largest company in terms of reserves and production.

And this means that it is no longer just a matter of big politics, but politics in the square ...

First, let's figure out who owned Rosneft TNK-BP.

This company was established in 2003 year.

«TNK-BP International Ltd. (TNK-BP) - the third largest oil company in Russia, whose shareholders on a parity basis are the British BP and the AAR consortium (Alfa Group, Access Industries, Renova). TNK-BP owns approximately 50% of the Russian oil and gas company Slavneft. TNK-BP accounts for about 16% of Russia's oil production (including TNK-BP in Slavneft). ”

In 2003, our British and American friends were preparing to buy Russian mineral resources for very little money. The first sign of this disastrous process for Russia was the creation of TNK-BP with the participation of British British Petroleum (BP). The second was the sale of Yukos to the Americans. Control over Russia's subsoil went abroad.

We have to understand that Western corporations will succeed in taking control of Russian subsoil and our budget will lose colossal money, and future generations will lose control over the wealth of our land.

That's what it is about when you read the news about the "oil news". It is impossible to allow foreigners to control the mineral resources of the field. That is why the Russian authorities intervened in the game. Unexpectedly for the West, Khodorkovsky in the same year 2003 went to jail, and the assets of his Yukos were eventually obtained by the state-owned company Rosneft.

Half the case was done, it remained to "squeeze" the British from TNK-BP. I described in detail the whole process of the “game” in the book “Sherche la oil».

This is what I wrote about five years ago in this book: “We should admire the resilience of proud Britons. They really want to stay in our oil and gas market, they want to influence it, and through this, to influence Russia's foreign policy. But it will not work. At this complexity, the company TNK-BP is not over. And sooner or later, but the British oil monopoly will be squeezed out of Russia, and its oil assets will be sold to a Russian company. “This is bad for us, bad for the company and, of course, very bad for Russia,” said Peter Sutherland, chairman of the board of the British oil giant, evaluating the developing events. And to the author of this book it seems that, on the contrary, it is good. Very good. Control over the main resource of the planet, over the main resource of his country in the hands of his government - is it good or bad? Answer this question yourself. ”

And finally, the British are squeezed out of TNK-BP. Squeeze out gently, over-the-way. But aggressively and steadily. The private company TNK-BP is fully redeemed from its shareholders by the state-owned company Rosneft.

“Earlier today it became known that the oil company Rosneft buys 100% of TNK-BP shares from the AAR consortium and the British oil company BP. The signing of the relevant agreement was announced by the head of Rosneft, Igor Sechin. The total amount of the transaction amounted to 61 billion.».

Does this mean that control over a large part of our bowels is returned to the hands of the Russian state? Yes it is.

Let's look into the confusing scheme of buying and selling oil assets.

First, make sure that Rosneft is truly a state-owned company.

We go to the website of the company, we read: http://www.rosneft.ru/Investors/structure/share_capital/

Share capital structure

The composition of shareholders (shareholders) of Rosneft Oil Company, owning more than 1% of the Company's authorized capital as of October 1 2012.


Why Rosneft buys TNK-BP


1. 75,16% belongs OJSC "Rosneftegaz"which is in 100% federal property.

2. Still 9,53% owned by LLC RN-Development, which in turn belongs to LLC RN-Trade, whose members are OJSC NK Rosneft (99,9999%) and LLC Neft-Aktiv (0,0001%), by 100% controlled by JSC "NK" Rosneft ". That is, Rosneft itself controls the company that owns 9,53% of its shares. This means that these percentages belong to the state.

3. The company itself OJSC “NK“ Rosneft ”has on its balance sheet, that is, it owns 3,04% "Self".

At this state participation ends. 10,19% which belong to Sberbank cannot be attributed to state assets, since the owners of Sberbank’s controlling stake are Central Bank, which is not subordinate to the government. Other individuals and legal entities are not interested in us either.

So: 75,16% + 9,53% + 3,04% = 87,73% Rosneft is owned by the state.

Now we are looking at the conditions on which our British "friends" agreed to give Rosneft shares in TNK-BP.

«The proposed transaction consists of two parts. Upon completion, BP will receive a package of Rosneft’s 18,5% stake and 12,3 billion dollars in cash. Taking into account the package of 1,25% of Rosneft's shares that BP already has, BP’s share in the share capital of a Russian company will be 19,75%.

So, in order for the British to lose 50% of the shares of the third largest oil company in Russia, we give them 18,5% of Rosneft.

As a result, control remains completely in the hands of Russia: we will have 69,23%, British Oil has 19,75%.

Of course, we would like our British partners to have a share in the depths of Russia equal to zero point zero. But politics is the art of the possible. And not the art of the desired. The British are removed from the control of the bowels, giving them only a piece of oil pie. Clean up after eight years of STRUGGLE with them for it!

(Just type in the TNK-BP search engine and the word “problems” and you will read how many difficulties and accidents you had to do to “convince” BP to give away the TNK-BP shares).

Now the conclusions that arise from the foregoing.

No privatization of Rosneft should take place. Otherwise, you can lose control over this important company. To talk about privatization, to smile, but to postpone it all the time and not to spend it for anything.
The strategic line of the Russian leadership to gain full sovereignty is complete control over the Russian bowels. But first, the complete rearmament of the army and fleet, development of a new state patriotic ideology. And then at the negotiating table with our British "friends" - with new trump cards.
To demand today to “drive the British with a filthy broom” from our oil industry is the complete absence of an adequate assessment of today's geopolitical reality. It is the same as demanding that Stalin send the Third Reich in August 1939, instead of signing a non-aggression pact with him. Only Svanidze can do this ...

While "they" are stronger - you need to negotiate.

This is the main art of politics and the head of state.
84 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +23
    25 October 2012 07: 49
    The article turned out to be very useful for me, gave an impetus for reflection, thanks to the author! good
    1. +3
      25 October 2012 11: 44
      All the same, jarred, so still the Russians did not own their resources, oil? And how are things in other areas, metallurgy, etc., there are also battles for their own resources?
      1. +3
        25 October 2012 12: 42
        ShturmKGB,
        And you do not know the metallurgical oligarchs?
    2. dimanf
      -4
      25 October 2012 13: 19
      Quote: krutishka
      The article turned out to be very useful for me, gave an impetus for reflection, thanks to the author!


      the author twitches and does not finish. Enough to cheat people. hiding behind patriotism.
      Rosneft will be privatized in the coming years!

      BP's entry into the capital of Rosneft does not cancel plans for further privatization of the Russian state-owned company, said Russian Economic Development Minister Andrei Belousov.

      Rosneft is one of the companies where readiness for privatization is the highest, "he said. Thus, according to the minister, the possibility of further privatization of the state-owned company remains." I think that everything is possible, "Belousov added.

      Meanwhile, Deputy Prime Minister Igor Shuvalov, who oversees the privatization, previously said that the Russian government is considering the sale of Rosneft shares in 2013-2014. Currently, 100% state-owned Rosneftegaz owns 75,16% of shares in Rosneft.

      "We believe that as soon as there is a better opportunity for placing this stake, it will be sold," I. Shuvalov said, adding that this position is shared by both the company's management and the chairman of the government. “We will work with high-quality investors so that they come to Rosneft,” he said.

      It should be noted that the authorities have repeatedly announced their intention to privatize part of the state package in the company. At the beginning of June 2012. Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said at a government meeting that Rosneft should be completely removed from state control by 2016. Previously, the state planned to transfer to investors up to 25% in the authorized capital of the company by 2015. At the same time, it was originally assumed in 2012. privatize up to 15% of Rosneft shares.

      Read more: http://top.rbc.ru/economics/24/10/2012/675889.shtml
      1. Login1
        +5
        25 October 2012 15: 50
        The author does not claim otherwise. Read carefully: "... No privatization of Rosneft" should not happen anymore...Talk about privatization, smile, but put it off all the time and never hold it... "This is not a promise, but a strong recommendation.
        Those examples that you cite so far are also conversations. For example, I support the position of the author of the article.
      2. +3
        25 October 2012 16: 57
        Quote: dimanf
        Rosneft will be privatized in the coming years!

        Rosneft promise privatize. To promise is necessary, to fulfill is not. If the Americans do not promise, they will be furious and do nasty things, and so, they will calmly wait. And when the time comes, it turns out that the crisis is not a good time for privatization, so you have to wait a while, and so on, so don’t worry.
    3. +2
      25 October 2012 16: 59
      Quote: krutishka
      The article turned out to be very useful for me, gave an impetus for reflection, thanks to the author!

      Article - Nikolay Starikov. Read also his book "The Crisis - How It Is Done", you are not yet so contagious wink
  2. +12
    25 October 2012 07: 53
    Thank you for the article.! I agree with the author of geopolitics is a delicate matter. and in a hurry it is impossible so much that the reformers, led by Nemtsov and the like, subjugated the country's wealth to the west.

    The next goal should be - the nationalization of the Central Bank
    1. +18
      25 October 2012 08: 18
      Quote: King
      The next goal should be - the nationalization of the Central Bank

      Moreover, 100 percent, it is a pity that we do not hear what they say behind closed doors.
      It remains to separate our oligarchs from the bowels, and so they are not badly welded.
      1. +8
        25 October 2012 09: 02
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        It remains to separate our oligarchs from the bowels


        Hi, Sasha, and you don’t have to try, they’ll immediately beat off the head
        The main foreign traders of Rosneft are Gunvor companies (the owner of 50% of this company is businessman Gennady Timchenko, a friend and former colleague at the KGB of Russian President Vladimir Putin
        1. biglow
          +6
          25 October 2012 10: 11
          Vadivak,
          You don’t have to translate everything into Putin’s current. After his resignation, he still won’t be able to live anywhere except Russia. They won’t let him live anywhere. They are always happy for the spotted one in the West. This is because Putin doesn’t need money. to spend and nowhere.
          1. vasev
            0
            25 October 2012 10: 28
            After his resignation, he still will not be able to live anywhere except Russia. They will not be allowed to live anywhere. They are always happy for the spotted one in the West. This is because Putin does not need money. There is nothing to spend it on.


            That is why he is rowing money so that he can spend it quietly in the West later laughing
            Putin’s daughters also left to live in Rostov wink
            1. +7
              25 October 2012 10: 32
              Putin’s daughters also left to live in Rostov
              This is all from the category "one grandmother said"
            2. 0
              25 October 2012 10: 35
              Well, where are Putin’s daughters? Coordinates in the studio.
              1. vasev
                +1
                25 October 2012 10: 58
                I was mistaken and they live in Russia ???
                I promise to publicly sprinkle ash on my head, if so smile
                1. +5
                  25 October 2012 11: 11
                  I can also ask for evidence that they do not live, but this is a state secret and someone will not give us information. Well, to build speculation is rumored to be not very correct, to say the least.
                  1. grizzlir
                    0
                    25 October 2012 12: 49
                    Quote: urzul
                    Well, to build speculation is rumored to be not very correct, to say the least.

                    If you don’t really believe Russian publications and Internet resources, you can look at foreign ones. If, after that, the information of foreign media remains for you rumors, then with the same success I will say that any media information is nothing more than rumors.
                    1. +4
                      25 October 2012 12: 54
                      Media like Echo of Moscow, Washington Post, Rain Channel. Are you talking about them?
                      Moreover, I repeat once again, we must think with our brains, and not take any news on faith.
                      1. grizzlir
                        -2
                        25 October 2012 13: 02
                        Quote: urzul
                        I repeat once more, you need to think with your own brain, and not take any news on faith.

                        If you think with your own brains, a question arises: Putin was repeatedly asked at a meeting with reporters about his family and daughters. He answered evasively, as he knows how, his daughters live openly with ordinary life. In which country he never answered. What are the secrets from of my own people. I can’t now recall a single head of state whose relatives are in such secrecy, on the contrary, their children live really openly. Just don’t please speak about the threat of terrorism, this threat is over all members of the ruling families, but all their relatives are well guarded special services.
                      2. +7
                        25 October 2012 13: 21
                        But are all relatives in love with public life? Have you ever asked such a question?
                        Or should Putin report to you how many times he sleeps with his wife? Let me remind you that we, as it were, chose the president, and not his daughters, or just want to meet?
                        By the way, I noticed for a long time that the most angry comrades in power live in Moscow, and this is with the established minimum wage in 11700, additional payments for pensions, other benefits available only to Muscovites.
                        Once you have already thought about the country in 91.
                      3. vasev
                        +2
                        25 October 2012 13: 31
                        But are all relatives in love with public life? Have you ever asked such a question?
                        Or should Putin report to you how many times he sleeps with his wife? Let me remind you that we, as it were, chose the president, and not his daughters, or just want to meet?


                        Mr. V.V. Putin could have said simply: "My daughters, like me, are patriots of Russia and live in our country." I look forward to his such phrase

                        By the way, I noticed for a long time that the most angry comrades in power live in Moscow, and this is with the established minimum wage in 11700, additional payments for pensions, other benefits available only to Muscovites.
                        Once you have already thought about the country in 91.


                        And this, comrade, is called juggling. A simple Muscovite, neither in 91 nor now can in any way influence the collapse or preservation of the country (except for rebellion and revolution of course). The USSR collapsed power, not the people.
                      4. +5
                        25 October 2012 13: 43
                        Russian President Vladimir Putin is not very fond of talking with reporters about his daughters. This topic is raised so rarely at press conferences that not every journalist can remember how many the president has. As you know, the head of state has two daughters - Maria and Katerina, 1985 and 1986 of birth respectively. They study at St. Petersburg State University.

                        The youngest daughter of the president, Katerina Vladimirovna Putin, entered the Eastern Faculty of St. Petersburg University in 2005. This is one of the most prestigious educational institutions of the city. 116 faculty teachers teach students 92-m languages. The Oriental faculty together with the philological faculty cover almost the entire linguistic environment of the UN countries. Katerina Putin has chosen the department of history of the countries of the Far East and is educated in the history of Japan. Even before entering the university, she studied Chinese, and, as the dean of the Oriental Department, Yevgeny Zelenev, said, she successfully passed testing in this language. In the future, according to the dean, she may also begin to study Korean. Both daughters are educated on an individual program. According to Yevgeny Zelenev, this form of education is not a special privilege of presidential daughters. “We have several students getting education under this program. This form is available to excellent students and children who have special circumstances, for example, nonresident students. After all, we have no correspondence or evening department. In order to receive education according to an individual plan, it is necessary to take not only sessions, but also intermediate certification, the closest of which will be in October. Failure of intermediate certification means automatic deprivation of an individual plan, ”explained Yevgeny Zelenev.

                        However, Katerina Putin does not seem to be in such trouble. The presidential daughter passed the last session brilliantly. For each of the exams (and there were five in total - Japanese, Japanese history, Japanese geography, the history of the Far East and ancient history) Katerina Putin received an excellent rating. “As the dean, I am completely satisfied with the results that Katerina shows,” says Yevgeny Zelenev, “I don’t have to interfere in the process of her education.” To study Oriental and European languages ​​(of the latter, Katerina Putin’s plan is only English so far), the president’s daughter regularly meets with faculty teachers. The dean of the faculty did not comment on how often a girl happens to be in the building on Universitetskaya Embankment of the Neva, as this already concerns her personal life, and Evgeni Zelenev refused to talk about her initially: “Everyone, including Katerina, can enjoy certain privacy rights of his personal life. ” “Surprisingly, the president’s daughter’s safety issues weren’t specifically discussed,” says Yevgeny Zelenev. So, in general, Katerina receives education in the same mode as other students studying on an individual plan. ”
                      5. +3
                        25 October 2012 13: 44
                        Only three years are left to visit the building on the University Embankment Katerina Putin. After graduating from the undergraduate, she will go to graduate school. And by the time the masters of the Oriental faculty will be getting education elsewhere. It is noteworthy that for the entire 150-year history of existence, the faculty did not have its own home. Now he shares the area with philological faculty. But the Orientalists did not have much time to live in cramped conditions - soon after the arrival of Katerina Putin, the governor of St. Petersburg, Valentina Matvienko, allocated a new building on the Congress line of Vasilyevsky Island to the eastern faculty. In a small three-story building, 150-180 of future masters will study. As soon as the repair is completed, which, apparently, has not yet begun, the full-time master's program will move to the building. The dean of the Oriental faculty did not directly connect the receipt of the president’s daughter with the allocation of a new building, but such coincidences are still very rare. The eldest daughter of Vladimir Putin, Maria, entered the biological and soil faculty of St. Petersburg University. In terms of prestige, this faculty is much inferior to the eastern one - the competition is a little more than two people per place. But the secrecy within the walls of the main building of the university, in which future biologists and geologists are trained, is respected much more strictly. Dean of the faculty Igor Gorlinsky refused to communicate with the press. The assistant dean, hearing the name of the president’s eldest daughter, exclaimed in horror: “What are you, how can you? There can be no question of any interview on this subject! ”The fact that the dean of the Oriental faculty agreed to provide information about her student that is not a secret of her personal life without any problems, the assistant dean, who introduced herself as Larisa Alexandrovna, commented as follows:“ This is their business. ” It was not possible to contact the dean himself. The call to Vice-Rector for Research Vladimir Troyan did not help either. “I can’t put pressure on Igor Alekseevich, it’s not in my competence,” he explained. - I myself have not yet been able to see the presidential daughters with my own eyes. Although I would love to look at them, talked. Moreover, as far as I know, girls study very well. ” After a pause, Vladimir Troyan added: “On the other hand, as they say in Russia, the less you know, the better you sleep.” Not even talkative students of the Faculty of Biology and Soil turned out to be caught in the long corridor of the Twelve Collegia building. None of them, as it turned out, are familiar with Maria Putin. “And indeed, as far as I know, it is better to talk with the dean on this topic. And then we still may have some problems, ”the third-year student of a very conscious form explained.
                      6. grizzlir
                        -3
                        25 October 2012 14: 02
                        Quote: urzul
                        Not even talkative were students of the Faculty of Biology and Soil, caught in the long corridor of the Twelve Collegia building. As it turned out, none of them are familiar with Maria Putin.

                        It follows that Maria Putin does not study at the Faculty of Biology. Or all the students gave a FSO or FSB subscription for non-disclosure, therefore they are silent. For the second, I don’t believe it for some reason.
                      7. +2
                        25 October 2012 14: 04
                        Why not believe it, I saw how OBEP works, and not so shut up.
                        And here in general FSO.
                      8. +2
                        25 October 2012 13: 46
                        Then, too, everyone wanted abundance and prosperity.
                      9. grizzlir
                        -2
                        25 October 2012 13: 46
                        Quote: urzul
                        But are all relatives in love with public life? Have you ever asked such a question?
                        About this you answered popularly Vasev a little lower. I can not disagree with him.
                        As for my Moscow residence permit. I bought an apartment in Moscow four years ago. Former colleagues helped me find a good job. And I was born in the Ryazan region, then a school, Kharkov tank, garrisons, dangers, the second Chechen. By the way, before the second I was a mountain for Putin . I argued with the guys, then argued that he couldn’t put himself in the place of a front man on the presidency, if he promised more he wouldn’t go to the presidency.
                        So it’s not for you to judge me, my life shook me and I earned an apartment. But here, that there’s no work around Moscow and men from neighboring regions go to work for Moscow, this is a question for the authorities.
                      10. +2
                        25 October 2012 14: 09
                        By the way, Putin promised not to go for a third term, so why did you change your mind?
                      11. grizzlir
                        -3
                        25 October 2012 14: 28
                        Uzul. I appreciate you as a normal conversationalist, but as for Putin.
                        Remember the case of Colonel Budanov. Before the last trial, GDP speaks on TV and declares that Budanov is guilty and will be punished. One of the rulers of Russia, before the decision of an independent court, accuses a soldier of his army. I understand the politician is a dirty business, I do not know for the sake of whose interests it was done this statement was clearly not Russian. I experienced shock, anger, disgust. There was no doubt about the court decision. And this was only the beginning.
                        For me, the real politician that people will follow is the one who tells them the truth no matter what it is. I had to give credit to the GDP for the first time, I tried to keep my promises, later he realized that those to whom he promises forget these promises and you can promise and promise, and it’s not necessary to execute at all. I hope you also remember that Vladimir Vladimirovich promised us one assurance during the first presidential term that there will be a cruel fight against corruption.
                      12. 11Goor11
                        -1
                        26 October 2012 05: 04
                        grizzlir

                        It’s only because such types are interested in where other people's children are and how to get to them, although what matters to them, I personally would never open the personal data of my children.
                        This is the legal right of any person.
                        If you want the president’s publicity, well, become a personal enemy of all Wahhabis, and then publish your data openly to begin with.
                        And in truth what do you demand? Some kind of empty bravado? "Here they say, here's the exact information about my children, I'm not afraid of anything!" In your opinion, a smart person can say this? Only a complete idiot would not fear for his children.
                      13. dimanf
                        +1
                        25 October 2012 13: 29
                        Quote: urzul

                        Media like Echo of Moscow, Washington Post, Rain Channel. Are you talking about them?


                        and the better ORT. NTV OR channel Russia?
                      14. +1
                        25 October 2012 13: 43
                        That's exactly what;)))
                      15. dimanf
                        +1
                        25 October 2012 13: 53
                        Quote: urzul
                        That's exactly what;)))


                        but you often refer to different media!

                        But on the daughters of Putin, we have similar opinions.
                        Putin is the enemy. but touching a family is wrong!
                      16. +3
                        25 October 2012 14: 08
                        I try to refer mainly to accurate information, such as reports to shareholders. Well, about Putin’s little girls, if you raise all the media, then they already have 7 children, 7 citizenships and 3 husbands for two - if this is generalized.
                2. +2
                  25 October 2012 14: 29
                  Quote: vasev
                  I promise to popularly sprinkle ashes on my head, if so


                  There is a saying "I swore not to get chicken in the soup."
                  You constantly expose your arguments without facts and pop them like an unshakable truth. And this is banal meanness.
                  I offer you a new version of trolling: my daughters underwent plastic surgery and vocal cord surgery and were taken to the Zar Planet by the constellation Orion, and Putin is none other than an alien spy.
                  1. vasev
                    0
                    25 October 2012 14: 50
                    You are constantly exhibiting their arguments without facts and bustle them like an unshakable truth. And this is banal meanness.


                    And I think that this MY point of view. Я I am sure that Putin’s daughters do not live in Russia, like the children of so many top Russian officials. What happens to you in this case, the break of the template - these are your problems, not mine.
                    You can believe in my point of view - you can not believe, from this it will not change.
                    1. +2
                      25 October 2012 16: 36
                      And what do you care about this - is this the president of not your country? Yes, I wrote my comment not so much for you as for reading forum users.
                      1. vasev
                        -1
                        25 October 2012 16: 59
                        I perfectly understand what you wrote for - your work is such wink

                        And I need this because I do not want to see a revolution in your country.
                        A bloodless revolution is possible in Ukraine, but not in Russia. And we are too close to you, so that it does not affect us.
                        That’s why I’m trying to explain to the Russians who are Who, using the simplest examples. Nobody wishes their children harm. And if Putin’s children were in Russia, then his propaganda would not cease to mention this, but here is silent ... And why? Just the children of the first person of the state do not want to live in such a state, like the children of many officials, which can be confirmed by Internet messaging.
                        Is it bad that people will know the truth and think about it?
            3. biglow
              +6
              25 October 2012 11: 59
              vasev,
              without diplomatic cover, Putin will stay in the west, as long as it takes to arrest him through interpolation or some other European court. The Americans and the British will not leave Putin so easy
              For such people, money does not matter. From Stalin, too, only a tunic, a pipe and boots remained
              1. Denzel13
                +1
                25 October 2012 12: 32
                Another 500 rubles lay in the nightstand.
                1. Denzel13
                  0
                  25 October 2012 20: 23
                  I apologize, there was a savings book and it reflected the presence of 900 rubles.
              2. vasev
                +2
                25 October 2012 12: 51
                Let's see, I still hope to live to see the new / different President of Russia smile
        2. Dimonanet
          +1
          25 October 2012 12: 47
          And this is good! Putin in all sectors has his people! Which WORKS, of course, and profit not badly (well, but in another way), but WILL NOT FORGET !!! Taxes are paid regularly and without understatement !!! Consider it all as if privatized!
    2. Kaa
      +7
      25 October 2012 09: 03
      Quote: King
      very much the reformers led by Nemtsov and the like subordinated the country's wealth to the west.

      It would be nice to listen to Khodorkovsky’s comments on this matter ... so to speak, letters from afar ... although everything is more or less clear. And how much more to redeem, moreover, FORMER OWN, in the sense of a nationwide!
      1. vasev
        0
        25 October 2012 10: 17
        So this is a modern business like this:
        1. For sale for nothing state property
        2. Private owners for a decade profit from state ownership
        3. The state buys at a commercial price state property back

        The business is not bad, is it? :)

        And there is no need to build illusions about the return of the bowels of the people ... TNK-BP was established in 2003, for three years now the rules of the Sun :)
  3. grizzlir
    +7
    25 October 2012 08: 02
    We have to understand that Western corporations will succeed in taking control of Russian subsoil and our budget will lose colossal money, and future generations will lose control over the wealth of our land.
    For whom this statement is intended. People lost control over natural resources about 20 years ago. If we assume that ROSNEFT is almost completely owned by the state, then considering the cost of fuels and lubricants in Russia, it turns out that the state is pulling three skins from its own citizens. By and large, the price of fuel forms prices on many goods and services in the country.
    1. +7
      25 October 2012 09: 51
      If we assume that the company ROSNEFT is almost completely owned by the state, then given the cost of fuels and lubricants in Russia, it turns out that the state is pulling three skins from its own citizens.
      Only now this money goes to 70% to the budget and, again, to rearm our army. I must say right away that it is impossible to plunder all the money, they supply and build something.
      By and large, the price of fuel forms the prices of many goods and services in the country.
      Only for certain types of goods, the price of fuel and lubricants greatly affects the cost.
      A simple example is China, where prices for gas and electricity are higher than in Russia.
      1. grizzlir
        -1
        25 October 2012 12: 41
        Quote: urzul
        Only for certain types of goods, the price of fuel and lubricants greatly affects the cost.

        Fuel and energy prices affect almost the entire range of products. This topic has long been sucked up and proven by economists. Any product is made from raw materials, this raw material must be obtained, delivered to production, produced, delivered to the consumer. The chain is certainly not complete but without this fuel chain anywhere.
        1. +2
          25 October 2012 12: 57
          energy carriers affect almost the entire range of goods.
          It was about fuel and lubricants, and you have already included all energy costs.
          How much cost Fuels and lubricantsaffects the cost of, for example, aluminum?

          I gave you an example, China (fuel and lubricants and electricity are more expensive - the cost of goods is cheaper)
          1. grizzlir
            -1
            25 October 2012 13: 08
            Quote: urzul
            How much does the cost of fuel and lubricants affect the cost of, for example, aluminum?

            Fuel and lubricants belongs to the category of these very energy carriers. How does fuel and lubricants affect the cost ??? Exclude from the production process aluminum sheet machines working on fuel and lubricants. Mining trucks, excavators, diesel locomotives. All fuel and lubricants spent by these machines are put into the price of the goods. You can get and deliver ore or ore If you can re-melting without cars? If you can, a prize in the economic sphere is provided. However, horse traction remains.
            As for China. I agree that energy is more expensive in China. Only everyone knows that China has one of the cheapest labor in the world.
            1. +5
              25 October 2012 13: 32
              That's how strange it is that all these costs amount to 20% of the cost. And how much will the final cost increase if these 20% rise in price by 5% for example?
              At 1%, that’s all arithmetic, it’s just that our trading networks and shopkeepers successfully play on this.
    2. Purgen
      +4
      25 October 2012 14: 23
      And for you it is a huge discovery that the price of fuel and lubricants at a gas station without excise taxes of the state is 15-17 rubles (this is the cost of production, all logistics, profitability of the oil company, MET) per liter 92 gasoline. The rest is excise. The situation is approximately the same with Gazprom. The domestic price is being pulled towards the world price (before the "boys" from the WTO they signed that domestic prices for energy resources will eventually be aligned with the world prices) at the same time increase the withdrawals from Gazprom through an increase in the MET. Carousel yopt.
      1. +6
        25 October 2012 14: 53
        Quote: Purgen
        The domestic price is drawn to the world ... Carousel yopt

        Now for a bit of humor
        FORMATION OF PRICES FOR GASOLINE 1. When oil prices rise, the stump is clear, once gas is made from oil, then gas prices should rise. 2. When oil prices fall, oil companies have to raise gas prices in order to compensate for the fall in revenues from oil prices. 3. When oil prices are stable, then gas prices rise, because inflation.
        1. Purgen
          0
          25 October 2012 20: 22
          The state will tear up for excise taxes and mineral extraction tax. Yes, and I don’t want to reduce the absolute value of my own margin. I want to eat sweet food at any oil prices. And the question is. And hto pay for everything?)))). wassat
  4. Goga
    +5
    25 October 2012 08: 05
    Well, that's it! All this time I watched the progress of this process, so this news is from the category of long-awaited - and what is doubly pleasant - not only BP was blown away, but also "our" avens and vekselbergs were forced to make room good
    1. dimaas
      +3
      25 October 2012 09: 21
      Yeah, it worked. Only the author forgot to mention that until recently, dividends from Rosneftegaz's activities were accumulated on deposits within the company itself, and someone lived very well on this interest. Only recently did the state decide to partially withdraw its share (50 out of 150 billion). Who knows if it was in the interests of these persons that the mentioned transaction was made to cover the "lost" income.
    2. +4
      25 October 2012 20: 47
      Quote: Gogh
      "our" avens and vekselbergs were forced to make room

      So they moved that Vekselberg took first place in capsule competition for cutting dough in Russia.
  5. +4
    25 October 2012 08: 11
    Thanks to Nikolai Starikov, briefly and intelligibly. And everything was taken away from Khodor in time, that's why such a "howl." But it seems that they realized that the locomotive was gone, they began to forget about it, the media and "human rights activists" are now promoting the "opposition". "Everything passes and this will pass"
  6. +2
    25 October 2012 08: 32
    Alexander Romanov,

    Not just excommunicate, but leave them a lemon for poverty. The rest belongs to Russia!
    1. Kaa
      +1
      25 October 2012 11: 10
      Quote: nokki
      and leave them a lemon for poverty.

      According to the lemon, is this, like in a joke, eat so that the face is not so pleased? laughing
  7. +2
    25 October 2012 08: 35
    As it is sung in the song from the movie "The Three Musketeers":

    "Cunning, retreat, play, whirl, squeezing the enemy from the light ..."
    I think that in relation to our foreign "partners" these words of the song have long been true. How else to deal with them?
  8. +1
    25 October 2012 08: 56
    Oil companies do not own subsoil, they only produce oil. But stupidly getting taxes from oil companies is not interesting, they all go to the budget.
    And if you buy an oil company, at the expense of the state, then you can put your people in the leadership. Bonuses, kickbacks, etc.
    Gazprom’s top management received over a billion rubles over the past year. Rosneft leadership 1,8 billion
    1. +2
      25 October 2012 09: 57
      Well, so they have someone to look up to, a list of the highest paid top managers.
  9. Fox
    -1
    25 October 2012 09: 32
    old people wishful thinking.
  10. predator.2
    0
    25 October 2012 09: 52
    I wonder how this English cow (BP) appeared on our oil field? The one who launched it there, it would be time to hang up for the tricks! negative
    1. vasev
      -1
      25 October 2012 10: 19
      2003 ... For three years now, the Emperor of All Russia was thinking about the people wassat
      1. +1
        25 October 2012 10: 33
        In London, in the presence of Vladimir Putin and Tony Blair
  11. +3
    25 October 2012 10: 04
    To privatize the people for millions - buy after a while for the budget billions. This is so "our way". In order to believe in the harsh veracity of this postulate, it is enough to recall Abramovich's sleek physiognomy after his "deal" with the state.
  12. +4
    25 October 2012 10: 17
    Instead of nationalizing the Oil Industry, the Central Bank and other industrial enterprises, it would not be bad to first nationalize the power in the country itself, and it seems to me that the controlling stake in it does not belong to Russia at all. Without this, the nationalization of mineral resources is senseless, since the owner of OOO Rossiya remains the same.
  13. 8 company
    0
    25 October 2012 10: 31
    The author, it seems, is still not aware that in the Russian Federation the subsoil has always belonged to the state:
    "Subsoil Law" Article 1.2. Subsoil ownership
    The subsoil within the boundaries of the territory of the Russian Federation, including the underground space and minerals, energy and other resources contained in the subsoil, are state property. "
    1. +4
      25 October 2012 23: 05
      all according to the law you said
      I agree with you, you are right
      that our bowels are for the people
      and what FROM the bowels alas ... hi
  14. +1
    25 October 2012 10: 53
    Well that's nationalization 2,0
    + Receive BP deepwater drilling technology. And then Shtokmann needs to be developed. And there gas is VERY VERY much.
    1. +1
      25 October 2012 12: 17
      Nationalization? and this against the background of statements about the imminent privatization of Rosneft?
      An amazing phenomenon.

      At the beginning of June 2012. Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said at a government meeting that Rosneft should be completely removed from state control by 2016.

      Read more: http://top.rbc.ru/economics/24/10/2012/675889.shtml
      1. grizzlir
        -2
        25 October 2012 13: 30
        Quote: pistons
        At the beginning of June 2012. Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said at a government meeting that Rosneft should be completely removed from state control by 2016.
        And not only ROSNEFT. According to Medvedev, the share of state property should tend to zero. Well, no one pays attention to this. Everyone shouts URA.
        1. +2
          25 October 2012 14: 03
          http://www.un.org/ru/development/surveys/docs/investments2009.pdf
          http://www.un.org/ru/development/surveys/docs/investments2011.pdf
          Read an interesting report on the topic of investment flows in the world.
        2. +3
          25 October 2012 14: 51
          "And not only ROSNEFT.According to Medvedev, the share of state property should tend to zero. Well, no one here pays attention to this. Everyone shouts Hurray. "

          Oh, dance, Dima, Dima ... Companion.

          We look:
          Putin's decree: state shares in RusHydro, FGC, IDGC and Rosneft are not subject to privatization
          Vladimir Putin May 21, the day before the nomination of Igor Sechin to the post of chairman of the board of Rosneft, signed a decree on the inclusion of this company in the list of strategic enterprises. Thus, the list includes one share of Rosneft, which is owned by the state, Interfax reports.
          The list also includes government shares in JSC FGC UES, JSC "IDGC Holding", JSC "RusHydro" and JSC "System Operator".
          “The inclusion of these shares in the strategic list means that they are not subject to privatization,” presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov explained to Interfax.
          The list includes one share (0,000000009% of shares) of Rosneft, 60,38% of shares of RusHydro, 79,55% of shares of FGC UES, 53,69% of shares of IDGC Holding and 100% of shares of System Operator .

          Peskov emphasized that this, however, does not mean that the share of Rosneftegaz in Rosneft is not subject to privatization (currently it is 75,2%).


          http://www.gazeta.ru/business/news/2012/05/22/n_2354141.shtml
  15. Gorchakov
    +2
    25 October 2012 11: 07
    Starikov, as in most cases, is right ... What he writes is not always a secret for thinking people, but he writes as always relevant and most importantly on time .... To the author + ....
  16. 0
    25 October 2012 11: 35
    Kommenty SUPER !!! fellow
    Especially liked the rantings about the oligarchs, who do not belong to the people, bowels and power. good
    We wake up gentlemen (it is gentlemen, and not comrades, they have refused comrades in 91). hi
    For 20 years it’s been like in capitalism, but it assumes the above.
    Why are you surprised? fool
    1. Purgen
      0
      1 November 2012 21: 21
      Comments amuse, without question) .. About the bowels and especially the oligarchs) I just want to cry (.
  17. 0
    25 October 2012 13: 00
    A good victory in the next battle in the economic third world! drinks good
  18. 0
    25 October 2012 13: 45
    There, a German company mainly drills Haliburton on US machines. And serves Schlumburge
  19. +3
    25 October 2012 14: 37
    "As long as 'they' are stronger, you need to negotiate." - Here is the gist of this whole article, a digital and logic with a forecast !!!

    Always laughing loudly and loudly at advertising - "Gazprom is the property of the people!"
    1. +1
      25 October 2012 20: 48
      By the way, no one will explain to me what this advertisement is for and who sponsors it, because Gazprom doesn’t need to advertise to ordinary people, it doesn’t sell anything to him, and if it does, it’s on no alternative basis ... My opinion is that this is one of stages of patriotic education, but I would like to hear a competent opinion.
  20. -2
    25 October 2012 14: 54
    Now Rosneft buys TNK-BP shares .... Then the state sells Rosneft into private hands ... So with Aeroflot it became
  21. dimanf
    0
    25 October 2012 18: 33
    picture in the subject.
  22. +3
    25 October 2012 20: 24
    Yes, so no one has ever worn their own people, and so at the time of grab privatization, the unified oil industry of the USSR pulled out and surrendered to the dorm so to speak so close to the emperor, Sibneft, Yukos, Surgutneftegaz, Gazpromneft, TNK, tower, Tatneft, and more a couple, then the state seems to be creating Rosneft and buying out billions of dollars from these gentlemen, so to speak, it seems to bring everything back under the control of the new state oligarchs, and now a new trick, what's the point then of a new privatization, which will end by 16 by the program? That is, now it turns out shaving, receiving 20% ​​of the transaction, and then another privatization, we (although we don’t have anything for so long), again we lose control, then we will probably buy it again ((((
    1. +1
      25 October 2012 22: 09
      The article is a set of pseudo-patriotic screams, completely dependent on the power of the patriot Starikov. And the conclusions are sheer nonsense!

      The strategic line of the Russian leadership to gain full sovereignty is complete control over Russian mineral resources.

      Whose sovereignty? Russian state or group of individuals close to the leadership?

      But first - the complete rearmament of the army and navy, the development of a new state patriotic ideology.

      Dima2020 has been broadcasting to us about the rearmament of the army and navy since March, but something that the wagon almost did not move. On the development of ideology in general, you can not talk, it is not clear on the basis of what actions the authorities, Starikov feels hope.

      This is the same as demanding from Stalin ..... This is the main art of the politician and the head of state.

      Well, how not to flatter the beloved president.

      No privatization of Rosneft should ever take place.

      Yeah, they forgot to ask Starikov. It will be necessary-privatize.
  23. mazdie
    0
    25 October 2012 22: 49
    The state is slowly but surely regaining control, first gas, then vodka, now tobacco and oil. Soon, if there is no big mess in the near future, soon everything will come back to square one.
  24. -1
    25 October 2012 22: 55
    Quote: mazdie
    The state is slowly but surely regaining control, first gas, then vodka, now tobacco and oil. Soon, if there is no big mess in the near future, soon everything will come back to square one.

    Gos. plan? Five year plan? Coupons?
    1. mazdie
      +2
      25 October 2012 23: 49
      No, but the state must control vital branches, otherwise it will not be. Recycling, technology development, intelligence. Why are you not a field for activity? Resources are a state monopoly! (Otherwise, we will lose all this again)
  25. +1
    25 October 2012 22: 55
    VV is a strategist !!! Tinsel for the layman is not enough.
  26. +1
    25 October 2012 23: 07
    With one hand they recognize the inefficiency of state management of enterprises and voiced the course towards privatization (DAM's appearance as president and prime minister), with the other hand they buy up the assets of companies.
    Strange where is the logic? Will there be more taxes? Then it is necessary to buy Lukoil and everything else so that Rosneft becomes the largest oil giant.
    1. mazdie
      0
      25 October 2012 23: 53
      Nothing strange, bad, good cop. Personally, I, despite all the confusion, see a clear vector for the restoration of the state.
  27. Igoranama
    0
    25 October 2012 23: 25
    - ... The current main goal is to develop production up to 9,5-10 million barrels per day and hold it for as long as possible in the hope that new fields will be already developed by the time depletion occurs. The expert has no doubt that the main reason for the acquisition of TNK-BP assets for Rosneft was precisely the new fields ...

    Somehow "everything hurts smoothly", not everything is "offhand" quite simple ...

    Here is the related article for information: http://warfiles.ru/show-16171-forbes-kreml-vzyal-bp-v-zalozhniki.html
    And here for curious thoughts: http://warfiles.ru/16263-rossiyskie-neftegazovye-korporacii-po-mnogim-parametram

    -obhodyat-zarubezhnye.html
  28. +3
    25 October 2012 23: 46
    First, they gave them to the British "for so" then they were heroically "squeezed out" for as many as eight (!) Years, and they were also paid extra and the shares of the common company were dumped as much as 19% ... So they "squeezed" or vice versa "squeezed" the British into Russian oil? Isn't 19% of the combined company equal to 50% of the former? The authorities lead the Russians by the nose, pretending that they are "fighting" for human good, but in reality ... eh ...
  29. +1
    25 October 2012 23: 52
    VV strategist - definitely! I feel gentlemen, I smell! We will see! If I make a mistake, I’ll carry you the appointed punishment!
    1. 0
      26 October 2012 00: 16
      Please comment on your minus!
      1. +1
        26 October 2012 07: 31
        studentmati,
        This is true for the "gentlemen" someone slapped you. wink
        1. -1
          26 October 2012 13: 05
          I’m afraid of the commitment :)) (plus from me, I agree that a strategist, and with an eye on for decades, is not even strategic here, a global vision is necessary, as long as Putin has everything (pun intended))
  30. Gavrn
    0
    28 October 2012 01: 50
    Another 9,53% belongs to RN-Development LLC, which in turn is owned by RN-Trade LLC, whose participants are Rosneft Oil Company (99,9999%) and Oil-Active LLC (0,0001, 100%), 9,53% controlled by Rosneft. That is, Rosneft itself controls the company, which owns XNUMX% of its shares.

    I love such furious schemes. It seems, sitting below and seeing only a piece of cake, the question naturally arises - why? And someone sees the whole pie and does just that and not otherwise.