Sberbank translates Russia's defense in foreign offshore?

39
Stories with raider attacks in Russia in recent years, they began to appear on the information fields of various regions with enviable consistency. At the same time, the overwhelming majority of Russian citizens see the term raiding as a picture, when armed men in camouflage and masks make a sort of Mongol-Tatar raid on an enterprise, remove the old leadership and put new people in its place, who have since become the masters factory. However, the Voronezh region has managed to debunk this stereotype about the “black-masked” raiding ...

The company, which turned out to be in the epicenter of the raider events, turned out to be Pavlovskgranit OJSC, which is the largest granite crushed stone producer in Europe. The publication “Military Review” became interested in the situation at Pavlovskgranite due to the fact that this enterprise has been directly related to the interests of maintaining the country's defense capability over the past few years. The fact is that the Pavlovsk plant includes its own factory cluster, which specializes in the production of special emulsion explosives. These substances can be used in the production of crushed granite, as well as for military purposes. EVW is superior to TNT in several characteristics at once, and therefore it is an object of keen interest on the part of experts in explosive engineering issues from different countries of the world.

Today, the work of this large enterprise is almost completely paralyzed. The fact is, on Pavlovskgranit, in fact, there is no master. No, those who want to declare their full-fledged business at the plant, in fact, today are more than enough, but the situation remains more than tense.

Referring to recent history, which is associated with Pavlovsky GOK. In 2008, the deputy of the Voronezh Oblast Duma Sergey Poimanov, who at that time possessed a controlling stake in the company, decided to get 100% control over Pavlovskgranit by buying out a share from his partner Sergei Mamedov. To do this, he decided to take a loan in the amount of 5,1 billion rubles in Sberbank. At the same time, Sberbank issued a loan to Poymanov on the security of about 36,4% of the company's shares, which the regional official already owned by that time, as well as on the security of the deputy’s personal property. For one and a half years, Poymanov used the received funds to develop production at Pavlovskgranite, trying to bring the Voronezh enterprise to the path of extracting solid profits. However, as is known, at that time Russia, like the whole world, was experiencing not the best economic times, and it was extremely difficult to reach full-fledged profitability. The financial situation at the enterprise continued to deteriorate, and Poymanov, as the main shareholder of Pavlovskgranit, did not have the means to repay the loan in relation to Sberbank by 2010. At the same time, Sergey Poymanov himself argues that as soon as the fact of insolvency manifested itself, he personally asked the board of Sberbank for debt restructuring, and there were more than two dozen appeals to the bank.

Instead of obtaining consent for debt restructuring, Poymanov received a proposal from the Sberbank board to buy out 51% of the shares of an unexpectedly unprofitable production for 1 million rubles. For comparison, 1 million rubles worth well-furnished studio apartment in the city of Pavlovsk ... This price in Sberbank, apparently due to the fact that there is a crisis in the country, which means that the owner and this should be happy. The real price of the controlling stake in the company at that time was about 13 billion rubles. In other words, Sberbank offered the owner a “deliverance” from the enterprise at a cost that is 13 thousand times less than the real production cost!

Obviously, such a proposal from one of the largest Russian banks looked at least strange. As a result, the transaction, for obvious reasons, did not take place, and the board of Sberbank, apparently deciding to revenge in a peculiar way to the intractable Poymanov, suggested that he should pay for his loan obligations ahead of time, which the owner of the company could not do physically.

Then the fun began. Sberbank, taking advantage of the fact that Sergey Poymanov, pawned more than 36% of his shares, this package simply takes its hands, to which, in principle, it has every right. But the point is not that Sberbank “takes its own”, but that, strangely, the shares later end up in the hands of the owners of companies registered in offshore zones: in Cyprus and in the British Virgin Islands. Sberbank simply sold the shares to its own structure, Sberbank Capital, which, in turn, resold the debt package to some Atlantic LLC, and this structure went even further in selling the shares. In addition, at the end of 2011, about a further 25% of the shares of Pavlovskgranit, which were already personally owned by Sergey Poimanov, were sold. The initiator of the auction was the State Property Agency. In other words, a strategically important enterprise that is directly related to the country's defense, is in the hands of people directly related to foreign countries and foreign private companies.

After that, people arrived on the territory of Pavlovskgranit, whom Poymanov himself calls ordinary raiders, but whom the opinion seems to be of little interest to this person. Yury Zhukov, who heads the National Non-Metallic Company, who himself announced to the GOK employees that the former owner, Mr. Poymanov, can position himself an “armed seizure” of the production, is positioning himself as the new head of the company. Capture, however, did not take place, because the new leadership decided to turn the GOK into an impregnable fortress, cutting off all possible entrances for Poymanov and his people. As a result, Sergey Poymanov himself was exposed as a raider. At the same time, it remains unclear how Mr. Zhukov has become a new protagonist in this story. But there is an answer to this question too: it turns out that the owner of the National Non-Metallic Company is very close to the management of Sberbank, who, apparently, Pavlovskgranit liked very much ...

Sergei Poymanov says that he, on behalf of the company, was forced to go to court today, and before the decision of Sberbank to sell Pavlovskgranit shares to offshore companies, also to write a letter personally to Vladimir Putin. Putin, who at the time of receiving the letter, was the head of the Russian Cabinet of Ministers, ordered the head of the Department of Economics, and now the Minister of Economic Development, Andrei Belousov, to deal with the situation. However, the trial of Belousov ended up with the fact that Vladimir Putin was simply informed that the situation was in safe hands, and since the shares were going to Sberbank, then they would definitely manage them in the right way.

As a result, Sberbank, as we already know, really ordered the shares, but one thing is completely incomprehensible: does the ordinary (even if large) financial institution of the country have the authority to resell the shares of enterprises directly related to the defense industry to firms registered in foreign countries . It turns out that a financial transaction that was conducted a couple of years ago by Sberbank, to put it mildly, needs additional study and evaluation. And it also turns out that someone purposefully concealed from Vladimir Putin what the story of selling Pavlovskgranit shares to new owners through Sberbank might end.

In such a situation, there is no need to try to talk about an illegal decision in relation to the deputy Poymanov, because he took the loan himself, which means he had to believe that if it is impossible to pay it off, the bank has the right to dispose of its collateral. Yes, and to engage in business in our time, to put it mildly, is not recommended ...

However, the question is not even Poymanov, but what actions did Sberbank take with the very collateral shares themselves. It turns out that if an enterprise that works to increase the country's defense, but for one reason or another, is partially or fully in private hands and cannot pay off creditor banks, then the property of these enterprises can be sent to where the board Bank considers it necessary and profitable. If so, then Pavlovskgranit and its new leadership, which is associated with foreign offshore companies, can only become the first sign of “innovative” corporate raiding. At this rate, it comes to selling directly over the hill, or into the hands of those who have interests behind this "hill", and other defense enterprises of the country. The calculation is clearly done on the fact that the problem will be launched on the brakes and the public will not know about it.

This could put an end, or rather a bold question mark, but ... New applicants for the possession of Pavlovskgranit decided to justify themselves with the help of the court. According to their version, Poymanov himself, being the owner of the GOK, was engaged in illegal cases and abused powers. Today, the Investigation Committee is conducting an investigation into where and how, Sergey Poymanov, brought about 1 billion rubles in profits from Pavlovskgranit at the time when he himself announced his insolvency.

In general, in a dispute over such a gigantic enterprise as Pavlovskgranit, as they say, all means are good. It is extremely difficult to figure out who is right and who is already guilty ... But in this whole situation, it is alarming that the further this will go, excuse me, the fuss of shareholders, the further the enterprise will move away from the needs of the Russian economy and defense ...

Materials used:
http://moment-istini.ru/program_archiv/archive2012/
http://izvestia.ru/news/532123
http://pda.arbitr.ru/press-centr/press_arb_sud/54083.html
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    25 October 2012 09: 26
    Why do we need to know? Let the arbitration do this. So "Sberbank" is audited every year, and it makes no difference to me to whom it has transferred its assets to management, if they are profitable. The defense orientation of the enterprise raises doubts, each quarry turns out, or the mine is a military-industrial complex enterprise. The former owner of the enterprise is also interesting, in parallel, a deputy of the local parliament, took out a loan and could not raise the enterprise, well, sell it to someone else who can bring it to profit. The article looks like a customized one. And I would call the article "GREEDY".
    1. newFeofan
      +3
      25 October 2012 10: 01
      Quote: Lazer
      Do we need to know why?

      Know in any case does not hurt.
      Quote: Lazer
      The former owner of the enterprise is also interesting.

      You don’t want to take a look at the whole situation, but how to wash the bones to whom is the best thing.
    2. +5
      25 October 2012 10: 21
      Quote: Lazer
      And I would call the article "GREEDY".

      And I would add: "the greed of German Gref." This notorious gentleman has been the owner of Sberbank for some time now. At one time, he "became famous" for what he called the Russians a lazy people. unable and unwilling to work. There was a scandal, but this "pearl" was forgiven him. His greed is also known, every month he writes himself bonuses of several million rubles (this is not counting a sickly salary!).
    3. +1
      25 October 2012 20: 29
      Gref is a friend and associate of Chubais! Any questions???
      1. +1
        25 October 2012 21: 54
        To urgently shoot all the leaders of the Savings Bank, involved in this with the wording "Traitor to the Motherland" !!!
        1. Hon
          0
          26 October 2012 08: 51
          And what is treason to the motherland? Is the company changed ownership?
          1. +1
            26 October 2012 14: 19
            Hon,
            Everything is much simpler, if the offer of Sberbank to sell 13 billion for 1 million, it was, in fact, put nafig on the bunks of all who are in the subject.
            If the company has a defense or strategic weight, the state should have 51% and control, or the same representative on the board with the right of veto.
            If the bank goes too far with demanding credit obligations, then start the proceedings in full.
            Identify the culprit and the bunk.
            1. Hon
              0
              26 October 2012 16: 07
              What article of the criminal code? Yes, Sberbank took advantage of the predicament, and received the plant for nothing, but at the same time everything was within the law, moreover, it was a common situation.
              This enterprise does not have a non-strategic defense scale, it just has a daughter who produces explosives, by analogy any pyrotechnics factory can be attributed to defense. The Bank acts within the framework of the law and the agreement. and any check will show it. The contracts always state that in case of delay in payment of a loan, the bank has the right to demand early repayment of the loan. What questions? Could not give credit to the lost company. The business thing is tough.
              1. 0
                30 October 2012 17: 50
                Hon,
                Yes, the money does not smell, you can’t say anything.
                The Criminal Code contains articles on the use of difficult situations for personal purposes against women or people with disabilities.
                Yes, it’s not a question of considering such actions as raiding on the bunks. dot.
    4. Lucky
      0
      26 October 2012 11: 27
      This article must be sent to the prosecutor
  2. newFeofan
    0
    25 October 2012 10: 00
    Quote: Lazer
    Do we need to know why?

    Know in any case does not hurt.
    Quote: Lazer
    The former owner of the enterprise is also interesting.

    You don’t want to take a look at the whole situation, but how to wash the bones to whom is the best thing.
  3. +8
    25 October 2012 10: 34
    At first, I also did not quite understand what the song was about. But after reading the article everything fell into place .....

    "However, the question is not even Poimanova, but what actions did Sberbank take with those pledged shares. It turns out that if an enterprise that works to improve the country's defense, but for one reason or another, is partially or completely in private hands and this cannot pay off the creditor banks, then the property of these enterprises can be let go where the bank's board deems necessary and profitable.If so, then Pavlovskgranit and its new management, which is associated with foreign offshore companies, can only become the first swallow "Innovative" raiding. "

    The question is essentially!
    1. And who rules Sberbank with us?
    Answer - German Oskarovich Gref - President, Chairman of the Board of Sberbank of Russia.
    2. Who is German Oskarovich?
    Answer - In 1991-1992 - legal adviser of the 1st category of the Committee for Economic Development and Property of the Administration of Petrodvorets and St. Petersburg.
    In 1992, he was appointed head of the Petrodvorets District Agency of the Committee on City Property Management of the St. Petersburg Mayor's Office.
    In 1992-1994 - Chairman of the Property Management Committee, Deputy Head of the City Administration of Petrodvorets.
    In 1994, he became Deputy Chairman, and then - First Deputy Chairman of the Committee for the Management of City Property of the City Hall of St. Petersburg.
    In 1997-1998 - Vice-Governor, Chairman of the Committee for the Management of City Property of the City Hall of St. Petersburg.
    In 2000, he was appointed First Deputy Minister of State Property of the Russian Federation.
    From May 2000 to September 2007 - Minister of Economic Development and Trade of the Russian Federation.
    3. And whose companion is he German Oskarovich?
    The answer is all the guys in the Government and leadership of the country who are from the glorious city of St. Petersburg.
    4. And who gave the opportunity to Oskarovich German, to carry out transactions of this magnitude, with almost state-owned enterprises?
    Answer - See clause 3
    5. Then what is it surprising that Sberbank carries out such interventions?
    Answer - Nothing! The same eggs, only in profile. Privatization used to be when they grabbed a lot of the legally for a penny. Now, with the help of state instruments, such actions are being carried out.
    1. Hon
      0
      25 October 2012 12: 41
      Quote: sancho
      to carry out transactions of this magnitude, practically with state-owned enterprises?

      The enterprise is not state-owned; it has little to do with the defense industry complex; in fact, it has no relation at all. The usual dispute of business entities. Yes, Sberbank did not act fairly honestly, but the business is tough, the actions of Sberbank are absolutely legal. The management of the Savings Bank is obliged to care only about the benefits of the Savings Bank, and it is very profitable to get Pavlovskgranit. Any other bank would have done the same, and if it hadn’t, then the leadership of such a bank should have been dismissed immediately.
    2. mar.tira
      +1
      25 October 2012 14: 52
      Quote: sancho
      And who rules Sberbank with us?

      YOU have forgotten that the board of directors of Sber.bank also has its honorary "member" by the name of Kudrin. With all the ensuing consequences.
    3. 0
      25 October 2012 16: 36
      Familiar told that Gref - Homosexual !!!!! In short, fagot, almost all the women were taken out of the bank, introduced fitness for employees, and during it paws men ... fuuu bl ... How can one expect something good from such a person?
      1. Hon
        0
        25 October 2012 16: 51
        I do not know how much about the homosexual is true. But he has two children, and by the way, he served in the special forces of the internal troops.
        1. 0
          30 October 2012 17: 53
          Hon,
          The expression which was used in the deleted commentary probably has not so much a physiological meaning in relation to the aforementioned subject, but rather a moral assessment of his actions. Formally, according to different criteria, at least every second one gets such a definition.
  4. +3
    25 October 2012 11: 17
    Well, lovers of market economics and private business are larger than cheburechny, do you have anything to say? Here he is - a private trader in a large enterprise!
    I don't see something "effective". Interestingly, raider seizures of a state-owned enterprise are possible?
    1. Hon
      +1
      25 October 2012 12: 44
      What about the enterprise? It just changed ownership.
      Quote: Magadan
      Interestingly, raider seizures of state-owned enterprises are possible?

      No are not possible since they are not joint stock companies.
    2. 0
      30 October 2012 17: 55
      Magadan,
      NO, in principle, you won’t even have time to put the first signature on the order, you’ll cut the forest on new land.
      And private owners, to whom they complain!?
      Of course, this does not apply to pure state enterprises; they cannot change the owner.
  5. +2
    25 October 2012 11: 48
    Magadan,
    Well, lovers of market economics and private business are larger than cheburechny, do you have anything to say?

    And what will they say? one "effective manager" domain managed before bankruptcy and got on the network to another "effective".
    Reminiscent of the famous fable "How a thief stole supplies from a thief."
    One thing is insulting - all losses from these graters will again fall on taxpayers.
    1. wax
      +2
      25 October 2012 15: 35
      The owner will only be effective when he earns everything. And the fraudster, who has grabbed for free, will strive not to manage, but to continue to grab and prepare alternate airfields in order to evade responsibility. Before the emergence of an effective owner, Russia may not survive. It is necessary over each owner who owns funds important for the security and defense of the country to set the rates of the Supreme High Command for the representative.
      1. 0
        25 October 2012 23: 51
        That is why, for the time being, we cannot have an owner above the cheburechny level. Well, it will rise on the cheburechny, high plants for your money and build
    2. 11Goor11
      0
      25 October 2012 17: 09
      But if the enterprise is private, then how can this affect taxpayers?
      I mean, the company will give less taxes to the state? Hardly.
  6. Law
    Law
    +1
    25 October 2012 11: 54
    It is surprising that Sberbank has been positioning itself since 1841 as a savings bank of Russia, and in fact it is a corruption scheme for laundering money throughout the country!
    1. Andrey64
      0
      25 October 2012 12: 30
      No wonder - Sberbank is a commercial structure that defends the interests by no means state ...
    2. dimanf
      +2
      25 October 2012 13: 49
      Quote: Zakon
      It is surprising that Sberbank has been positioning itself since 1841 as a savings bank of Russia, and in fact it is a corruption scheme for laundering money throughout the country!


      bears are sawing the budget!
      Putin screams cheers!
      1. +2
        25 October 2012 14: 21
        Fable Bear and Lion.


        In the forest, Leo was the king of beasts. He ruled the forest like this:
        To whom, a medal, whom, in a hickey, to whom, with your foot in a nickle.
        Mishka somehow had a headache from a hangover,
        He took a club and went to Leo to download rights.

        “Why,” shouts, “are you a king?” I'm not a wimp either!
        But did not have time to finish, as he received in a nickle.
        As soon as the plaster was removed from Mishka, he began to stir up the animals.
        - Like, Leo does everything wrong, scum and villain.

        - Now, if I were a king, I divided everything equally.
        I Hare - brother and Hedgehog - brother, I would pour to everyone.
        Yes, I do not need anything, I want you well.
        You will help Leo drive away, I will make you rich.

        And now the Bear leads a huge crowd.
        The crowd yells frantically: "Get up to the mortal battle!"
        Our Leo did not expect such a turn of affairs.
        And grabbing a piece of meat, tightening his tail, fled.

        Under the roar and the roar of a crowd of animals, the Bear climbed the throne.
        From now on, he is the king, and god, and the first champion.
        The bear said: “Now everything belongs to you in the forest!”
        And they began to drag everything into a hole, which is bad, where it lies.

        And since then began a mess, anarchy in the forest.
        A fox gives his love in exchange for sausage.
        They don’t go to school, but sniff The Moment,
        In the forest prison, the fence fell, the entire contingent escaped.

        Ferrets steal wallets, Sheep drink vodka,
        And the Wolves, steal the bull, roast and devour.
        Outrage is happening in the forest, a thief is sitting on a thief.
        Beaver and Woodpecker cut down a forest, rafting down a hill.

        Only a month the bear was king, but completely insolent.
        He taxed animals, he ate honey.
        And everything feasts, everything buzzes, and rules somehow:
        To whom, a medal, whom, in a hickey, to whom, with your foot in a nickle.

        The essence of this fable is this: it doesn’t matter, king, what
        You used to be bare-ass and you’ll be without pants.
  7. +2
    25 October 2012 13: 06
    The guys’s exaggeration is certainly correct, but the latest articles are so pissimistic that I want to go into the cellar once more and check the bag, count the canned goods, crackers, gas mask. Friends are more optimistic, but this is already too much. I like this site but because of the constant depressure I stopped going here well, from the world of tanks, to be honest.
    1. Lucky
      0
      26 October 2012 11: 31
      It’s just not only that such a mess is going on here, it’s such nonsense all over the world, a person has got to power and is starting to stir up water!
  8. karimbaev
    0
    25 October 2012 16: 19
    Well, live, your potential adversary has the assets of your country.
    1. Hon
      0
      25 October 2012 16: 38
      Assets of one enterprise are not assets of the country. In Kazakhstan, are all enterprises exclusively state-owned and (or) no enterprises owned by state-owned companies?
  9. 0
    25 October 2012 19: 45
    У request x ..
    As in Monopoli, the fate of the Country is inclusive of 280000000 citizens.
    1. Hon
      -1
      25 October 2012 19: 54
      And then the fate of the country? Well, the private enterprise has changed, so what?
  10. 0
    25 October 2012 20: 12
    k "What does the fate of the country have to do with it? Well, the private enterprise has changed the owner, so what?"
    Something like globalizing finance with western firms?
    So they will eat, not choke, and still take.
    1. Hon
      0
      26 October 2012 08: 57
      So any foreign company can easily buy any commercial enterprise since the beginning of the nineties. All over the world, for example, Volvo belongs to the Chinese. Many factories and enterprises in our country are owned by foreigners, and so what? The main thing is that these factories work and pay taxes, and to whom they belong is absolutely not important.
  11. Crash
    +1
    25 October 2012 23: 21
    Citizens, then you need to try to inflate this information over the Internet so that everyone knows.
    1. 0
      25 October 2012 23: 55
      Yes, here infa is worse:
      In the Komi Republic, 23 Veterans were burned alive in a nursing home, three managed to escape. All officials guilty of this tragedy received CONDITIONAL terms. Information is on the official website of the Investigative Committee (SC) of the Russian Federation. Read more: http://www.km.ru/v-rossii/2012/10/25/sledstvennyi-komitet-rossii/695841-triumf-p
      ravosudiya-v-rf-uslovnye-sroki-za-23-
      Over us for a long time so bureaucrats along with the judges will cynically laugh?
    2. Hon
      +2
      26 October 2012 09: 01
      Go to the website of the arbitration court and such information on similar enterprises carriage and small cart. This is generally a standard situation, enterprises are constantly bought and sold, the change of ownership is ongoing. If you have enough money, you yourself can buy up shares and become the owner of the mining and processing enterprise.
    3. Lucky
      0
      26 October 2012 11: 32
      This article must be sent to television!
      1. Hon
        0
        26 October 2012 16: 13
        And what is the interest in television? Absolutely legal actions of Sberbank. Purely show how you can legally acquire assets worth 13 billion for 1 billion?
        There is more interesting news! Knyshov's company received a contract for 7,428 billion rubles, a drop from the starting price of one percent. The contract provides for the construction of a road with a length of 19 kilometers. A sort of golden parachute for the deputy of the United Russia party, for the deprivation of the mandate. The fight against corruption costs a lot to the budget !!!
  12. A descendant
    0
    26 October 2012 22: 36
    Add to this Khoper and his nickel deposits. There is no way how the Urals Combine allegedly won at the tender. Only all this riffraff is registered in offshore