Russian Germans: at the behest of Catherine the Great ...

38
… Late evening. A large family, having read a prayer according to the Lutheran custom, sits down to have dinner. No one is having fun. Two months ago, the war with the fascists began, and although everything is still going on, there are plenty of provisions, and men from their village have not been called upon, it is still alarming and restless. Suddenly a loud knock on the door. Beyond the threshold are three people: the head of the settlement and with him two others with stern persons in military uniform. Cause the host to talk. Five minutes later, he returned pale with a frozen expression of bewilderment on his face and announced to the family that he needed to get together until morning, taking only what could be carried in his hands, stock up on warm things, as he would be taken far, far beyond the Urals to Siberia. Why? Order of relocation. For what? Just for being German.

And for 179 years before, they, the Germans, were invited to Russia. And not someone - Catherine II herself invited. But in order to understand the motives of this act, it is necessary to look even deeper into history.



The great Russian empress herself, named at the birth of Sophia Frederica Augustus Angelt-Zerbskaya, was born in 1729 in the then German city of Stettin in a German (from today's point of view) family. Perhaps this is the reason for her future affection for the descendants of the ancient Germans. However, when Fike (this was Sophia Frederica’s family nickname) at the age of fifteen was brought to the Russian Empire as the bride heir to the throne Peter Fedorovich, she immediately began to learn the language of her new homeland, her history, to get acquainted with the Orthodox religion and Russian traditions. The girl accepted Russia precisely as her own country. Now she was called Ekaterina Alekseevna. But the spouse, the future head of state, was just a fan of everything foreign, and especially the Prussian way of life. As history has shown, Catherine II did her best to become an empress. No, not the wife of the ruling person, namely the Russian monarch.

As a result of the coup d'état, Catherine was crowned king in 1762, in September. Unlike her husband, whom she dismissed from the Russian throne after a short period of chaotic reign, her reign program was thought out, thorough and consistent. It consisted of many interesting trends that seem to cover all aspects of the life of the people and the state. The new empress made a list of her main tasks. She said that it is necessary to govern an enlightened nation, therefore, in the initial order, every effort should be made to improve the level of education in the country. Order must reign in the state, society must abide by the laws, and well-trained police follow it. The main goal should be the prosperity and majesty of the Russian state, inspiring respect for the neighbors with its military strength and power.

Contemporaries characterize Catherine II as a ruler who respected, loved and appreciated our country and everything originally Russian. But where did the Germans come from then? Why were they needed in the country? And it was in the following. For the first time, foreigners, including Germans, appeared in Russia in a decent amount under Peter I, who invited them as scientists and artisans, capable of their personal example, as well as teachers and mentors, to transfer experience and knowledge to local residents. Catherine saw and assigned a somewhat different task to the foreigners. She was obsessed with expanding her empire. And sought this as a woman. A man-governor would prefer, having a similar goal, to wage war and seize new territories in the struggle. She used qualities such as intelligence, prudence, cunning, and royal favor. There was, of course, no courage in some controversial endeavors. During the years of the reign by the efforts of the empress, the Russian territory increased significantly in size - the southern fertile lands of the Crimea and the Black Sea region, a section of the Commonwealth joined. Thirty years after the accession of Catherine, the number of people in Russia increased by more than one and a half times, and our state became the most populated among European countries. And here, the German resettlement and the Manifesto of Catherine II 1762 of the year played a significant role.

In general, thoughts about the organization of colonies, or in another way, the projects of settling in the sparsely populated territories of our country arose under Empress Elizabeth Petrovna. But to bring them to life happened new ruler. Catherine herself prepared the so-called "calling" manifesto, inviting foreigners to move to Russia. The young empress substantiated him with her maternal — “obscene” - care and works about peace and prosperity of the empire entrusted to her by the god, which she sets for herself the main rule and guide to action on assuming the throne. As well as concerns about the multiplication of this abode. Further, Catherine noted that many foreigners, as well as those who were outside of Russia, her former subjects, ask for “beating their heads” for permission to settle in the empire. She declared “the most gracious” that she favorably refers to the resettlement of foreigners from different nations to us (except Jews), as well as to the return of those who had escaped from their homeland for some reason. Permission to resettlement was approved. The manifesto itself was called "On permission for all foreigners entering Russia, to settle in which provinces they wish about the rights granted to them." According to the decree, poorly inhabited regions of Russia, including Ukraine, were subject to settlement by foreign citizens.

It is quite understandable that on the day after the manifesto was announced, the flows of settlers in our country did not flood. Although Catherine did her best to find out about her decision in Europe. The manifesto was printed in Russian, in French, in German and in English in a hundred copies and sent to Russian diplomatic agents operating abroad. In the future, her loyal subjects needed not only to get the document published in local newspapers, but also to exert maximum efforts so that all this would have the greatest possible popularity. But, of course, the European inhabitants just did not want to leave their native lands and go no where to wild and sparsely populated parts of a distant and frightening country. And they themselves, and a little later the Russian diplomats who served in different states, came to the same conclusion - for such steps we need certain guarantees and privileges that would make people decide to take this desperate step.

When this joint appeal reached the Empress's notice, she was a foreigner, German by birth, who had arrived in a foreign country, instantly understood his essence. Therefore, a year later, “by-laws”, documents enabling the provisions of the first decree, were developed and issued, as we would say now. These are the “Manifesto on advance payments and privileges granted to foreign migrants” and the “Decree on the establishment of the Office of the Guardianship of Foreign Immigrants”. Having received the required guarantees and privileges, as well as a whole special institution that will protect their rights, foreigners are emboldened. The process of settling the uninhabited Russian lands began. People poured into our country, and for the most part they were from the south-west of Germany.

The first was soon followed by another “calling” manifesto. This document was also translated into different languages ​​and published in foreign editions. A publicist of that time, by the name of Schlozer, called the manifesto an action a real escape to Russia. And it was not surprising. After all, the document promised immigrants unprecedented benefits. Personal freedom and settlement to choose from anywhere in Russia. Exemption from any taxes for a decent period: in rural areas up to thirty years, in urban areas - up to five. Foreigners who organized the production were allowed to trade and even export their goods outside the country duty-free. A loan for ten years without interest was also provided, so that immigrants could acquire housing, furnishings, households, and reimburse travel expenses. It is clear that for poor European residents it was incredibly tempting. And how do you get exemption from military service? Constantly fighting among themselves, the rulers of the German lands needed to replenish their armies and did so at the expense of frequent recruits. Plus religious freedom and permission to build the buildings of their religious worship. And the right to own local governments and the possibility of unhindered departure from Russia. The benefits alone ...

The very creator of this controversial manifesto, Catherine II, explained it by the fact that there are still many “idle” places on the lands of the Russian Empire, that is, the uninhabited and unexplored, where various riches are hidden in the depths. She said that in our country there are many lakes, rivers, fields and forests of “commerce subject”, that there is a possibility of “reproduction” of factories, manufactories and “other factories”. The Empress promised that these innovations would benefit the Russian loyal subjects. A register of free and convenient to settle Russian lands was published: Tobolsk, Astrakhan province, Orenburg, Belgorod and many others. That is, in fact, the colonists could settle not where they wanted, but in designated places. And, for example, the Volga region, designated as the Promised Land, was not really rich ore, industrial rivers and lakes. Newcomers were rather strictly forced to engage in agriculture, and there were some good artisans among them. Nonetheless, foreigners drove and drove, founded settlements, developed land, and established farms.

In three years, since 1763, the number of immigrants has reached almost 23 thousands of people. After that, it was decided to temporarily stop the flow, until the arrivals were provided with houses, with all the necessary equipment and began to work fully to provide for themselves. The colonies on the Volga grew and grew: if there were only twelve in 1765, then another ten were added in another year, and there were already sixty-seven in 1767. Two years later, a population census was taken, showing that six and a half thousand German families live in the Volga 105 colonies.
Of course, both the authorities and the first colonists were very difficult, but the further course of history proved to all opponents of the manifesto how useful the event initiated by Catherine II was, both in terms of settling uninhabited territories, and the useful neighborhood of Russians and Germans.

... Early in the morning, German families crowd in anticipation of the train, soon to land. Where they are taken, they do not know, and, despite the approaching front line, no one wants to leave. Here they were teachers, doctors, workers and engineers. Russians studied their diligence and accuracy. They raised and improved this land with their sweat and blood. And the fault was only that their distant ancestors responded to the call of Catherine II and decided to come here. Here they found a new homeland, and our country found them, Russian Germans. They were not allowed to defend the country with weapons in hand. They went to a long way to the East, and not many of them came back ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    25 October 2012 09: 49
    Very good article, I liked it. What is not an option for settling Siberia and the Far East, there should not be foreigners, offer any citizen benefits and preferences, and I think people will go, and whoever lives there will think to stay. But this is from the realm of fiction.
    1. 0
      25 October 2012 20: 01
      Dear science fiction!

      Yes! you must offer benefits to the Slavs in Siberia! And then where else! Not in the central lane, there are Asians and our Caucasian friends live, be sure to Siberia!
      It is already necessary for our Russian state to pay the traitors to the businessmen-ghouls and bourgeois-traders Homeland, mainly the Slavs, and to beg, take the Russian to work, and I, Russia, will pay you so that he does not die of hunger and is not thrown out of the apartment, otherwise Russian you have to pay for the apartment - but there is no guest worker. The first step to increasing the Slavic population is to create hostility towards compatriots who hire foreigners as traitors to the national interests of Russia and not to listen to tales that everything will immediately rise in price, I say I’m not competitive - snot. It's about survival nation, and when there will be a lot of people everything will be populated by itself.
      Some will say mildly short-sighted patriots shout at every worthless vyser: We won’t buy sprats from the Baltic states, There are no Borjomi from Georgia, but I suggest there are no products produced by the guest worker. There will be a lot of Slavs and they will settle there, THIS IS FANTASY!
  2. biglow
    +3
    25 October 2012 09: 53
    It’s biased as it is written. In that case, remember how the Americans treated the Japanese. They generally locked them up in concentration camps. It’s not so simple with the Germans. Among them were spies who worked for the Reich and were simply dissatisfied who would most likely cooperate with the Germans. Stalin they just resettled and not shot. And among Russian Germans, those who hate Stalin are no more than among other peoples. The truth is always in the middle
  3. Skavron
    0
    25 October 2012 10: 26
    Actually, Peter I still began to attract and resettle Germans in Russia ...
    1. +2
      25 October 2012 20: 05
      it’s good that it’s not like Vladimir 1 -Asiatov
      1. 0
        23 September 2016 23: 37
        Why do you Asks not like all the Asians of the Slavic forest? Adolf Ivanovich between them and you, the Slavs who have overgrown each other, by the way, did not make any difference))))
  4. Larus
    +1
    25 October 2012 10: 42
    The message of the article is to repent before the Germans and Russians, or in general before all Germans for the next "atrocities" ...
    1. +4
      25 October 2012 11: 13
      And what do you know about them, especially about the Russian Germans? What atrocities are they talking about? They were deported before they even thought of offending at least a fly. "Atrocities" is that they worked harder than others? The Second World War brought them suffering no less than others. How many of you know who was the first to be executed in Buchenwald? German (Germans). He was only 23 years old (kid green), his fault was that he was a communist. His name was Herman Kempek. Do you want the nationality of the first batch of prisoners who were executed in Buchenwald?

      Buchenwald is a German concentration camp located in ... This was the first public execution in a German concentration camp. ... of which 14 citizens of the USSR, 500 Poles, 7500 French and 4700 Germans, and ...

      Former Chancellor Adenauer is also a former prisoner of the concentration camp.

      And many of the deported Russian Germans were officers, they were even kept in special camps until the end of the war, mainly in Siberia. Many were awarded orders and medals. The tragedy is common, when will people understand this?
      1. Region65
        0
        25 October 2012 15: 53
        well done, kotyara .... he told everything correctly ... their mother in the ass ... and this war in the ass .. a hundred times without Vaseline ....
    2. +2
      25 October 2012 13: 46
      Quote: Larus
      I sent an article in which, in order to repent before the Russian Germans


      ... There was such a feeling from reading the article ... It may be enough to instill in the Russians a sense of guilt for what has not been done or what was done as part of necessity, according to the laws of wartime!
      If the principles of tolerance existed in the USSR at that time, so beloved by Western liberals today, the course of the war would have been much harder or would have had a different outcome.
      Yes, there were deportations. Crimean Tatars, highlanders of the North Caucasus, the same Germans ... But these were the preventive measures necessary in those conditions. Somewhere redundant, but who will objectively now regard it?
      ... Didn't the very Crimean Tatars almost swear allegiance to Hitler? And what would happen if not for preventive deportation?
      1. +1
        25 October 2012 14: 15
        The article is not about the Tatars, not about the Highlanders (about them later), an article about Russian Germans. Among whom there were fewer collectionists than among Russians.
        1. xan
          -2
          25 October 2012 15: 25
          stupid Russians did not provide the opportunity for the Germans to become collaborators
      2. 0
        25 October 2012 17: 21
        So the only PREVENTIVE deportation was only with the Germans. And the Crimean Tatars, Chechens and others like them were deported just for specific "feats" of cooperation with the Nazis., Moreover, cooperation on a massive scale !, although one cannot deny the heroism of the representatives of these nationalities on the fronts, as well as the cooperation of a part of Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians with the Nazis ... BUT! In percentage terms, the deported peoples were distinguished by greater devotion to the Fuhrer's cause.
  5. +2
    25 October 2012 11: 09
    Thousands of broken lives.
  6. General_Nogay
    -5
    25 October 2012 11: 22
    Yes, and the author forgot to mention how this empress gave Alaska to Amers for penny debts !!!
    1. +3
      25 October 2012 12: 20
      Alaska was sold under Alexander II, almost 100 years after the reign of Catherine II!
      1. +4
        25 October 2012 12: 25
        On the sly, poor Fika can be blamed for everything - Vietnam? Grenada? laughing
  7. +1
    25 October 2012 12: 28
    The phrase from the article sounds very funny: "She was obsessed with the idea of ​​increasing her empire. And she achieved this as a woman. A male ruler, having a similar goal, would prefer to wage a war and seize new territories in the struggle. She also used such qualities as intelligence, prudence, cunning and royal favor ". - The question arises, where then were and what were such military leaders as Saltykov, Kamensky, Rumyantsev, Ushakov, Suvorov, Potemkin doing? Maybe only defensive wars were fought, as a result of which the territory of Russia miraculously expanded constantly?
    1. xan
      -1
      25 October 2012 15: 55
      I agree, a delusional article in this sense.
      journalist loser in history
    2. -4
      25 October 2012 20: 10
      Well, judging by Alaska as a woman, she was not very!
      1. DIMS
        +1
        25 October 2012 20: 18
        Why? It was with her that the development of Alaska began.

        Listen to the less ignorant from "Lube".
        1. 0
          25 October 2012 20: 50
          started and ended right there
          1. 0
            25 October 2012 21: 20
            Why? Read above ... "She was obsessed with the idea of ​​increasing her empire. And she achieved this as a woman ... selling Alaska she reduced the empire, is it so? So how a woman did not achieve her goal, so? Because she was not a woman ! it's sarcasm

            Well, Lube is a good group. She has a lot of fans. Do not upset them
      2. +1
        26 October 2012 13: 55
        Think ! A German by birth, became the Great Russian Empress, and continued the path of Peter 1, increasing the greatness of the Empire and the world to the peoples.
        This is already worthy of respect, more than.
        Moreover, it was sold later, and not under Catherine.
    3. 0
      26 October 2012 14: 01
      Despite some inconsistencies in the article, it is generally positive.
      Enlargement of the Empire is not necessarily carried out by military methods, and the term itself does not imply exclusively military methods, it is possible to conduct educational work among independent states with their inclusion in the Empire, raising the educational level of the nation, attracting (as in this case) skilled labor, the formation of the army, laws , border guards, navy, trade, industry, agriculture, etc.
      The article does not mention military campaigns since they have an indirect relation to economic activity.
  8. +10
    25 October 2012 13: 21
    Familiar with these people firsthand. Together with them he served an emergency, together he served 20 years in the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Probably in the general mass, like any people, their traitors and traitors could be found. but for the most part these people are not forgetting that they are Germans who identify themselves with the Russian people.
    Basically, people are very punctual and meticulous, working at the highest level. They have a very developed responsibility for their area of ​​work. Apparently this from the upbringing is laid. Those guys with whom he served an urgent life were scattered throughout the earth and everywhere they are successful.
    By the way, not all were deported. There were several German areas in Russia. Many fought mainly in engineering units, at factories, but were even in intelligence.
    From here it is difficult to judge, but with this relocation, Stalin got excited.
    1. +1
      25 October 2012 14: 20
      Thank you for most accurately conveying the general meaning of the tragedy.

      PS FAT PLUS
      1. 0
        26 October 2012 02: 27
        Thank you for most accurately conveying the general meaning tragedy.

        Only this in the conditions of that war was not a tragedy. 30 million lives of Soviet people is a tragedy.
        1. 0
          11 November 2012 15: 47
          A. Yaga,
          50 million who is bigger, if you take the figures, you don’t need to add at least 3 million, and the Poles over 40 unknown Poles are buried in Katyn, and it all started with 000 Poles, you see how they multiply.
          26,6 million people
          http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8_%D0%B2_%D0%92%
          D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D
          0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B5
    2. xan
      0
      25 October 2012 15: 58
      studied with them at a school and college in Kazakhstan.
      diligent middle peasants, excellent students, gouging-hooligans, or something outstanding simply wasn’t
  9. sergey05
    +1
    25 October 2012 13: 36
    It is unfortunate that the USSR had to take extreme measures against the Russian Germans. And in vain they fought in the first and second war.
  10. 0
    25 October 2012 14: 59
    It would be necessary now, if not in this, then in a more or less civilized way, to master Siberia and D.V.
  11. +1
    25 October 2012 15: 22
    You are shifting from a bad mind to a healthy one, it was not the Soviet government that was to blame, Germany, when you attacked the USSR did not think about ethnic Germans, and the Germans were not the only deported nation. Deportation is not an extreme measure, an extreme measure is a shooting.
    What Peter 3 was like, we know only from the words of Catherine the Second and her toadies, justifying their crime, they denigrated him with a robustness.
    1. 0
      26 October 2012 14: 07
      Quote: Setrac
      justifying their crime, they robbed him robustly.

      I think that it doesn’t matter anymore, he was a good guy, a bad thing is not a fact, but the story is exactly the same as it is.
  12. +2
    25 October 2012 18: 42
    Debatable. That the Russian people themselves could not populate these territories? I think that no one offered the Russian preferences that were given to the Germans. If we could give our Ivan a loan, lift it, and exempt from taxes, then he would take these uninhabited people into circulation immediately. And with us, as always, only foreigners and hope.
    KATKA DID NOT BELIEVE IN RUSSIAN VANKA. DAMALA DRINKS EVERYTHING. BECAUSE AND ITS OWN. And WHY WERE ITALIAN SETTLEMENTS, GREEK, SERBIAN? NO, ONLY THE GERMANS ARRIVED.
    HOW ALWAYS, THE GOVERNERS DO NOT BELIEVE IN THEIR PEOPLE AND FEAR HIM!
    1. 0
      26 October 2012 14: 09
      Wertynskiy,
      Not everything that you say is true, but I cannot say that you are not right in everything.
      It’s just that sometimes people are needed for certain purposes in a certain place, and those who are not always suitable for this!
  13. 0
    25 October 2012 19: 34
    Not everything was so simple and the article was biased, even if we start with the fact that when the Germans moved to Russia, they seized the houses of the Bashkirs there, which led to their participation in the uprising of Emelyan Pugachev.
  14. 0
    26 October 2012 13: 52
    The ending did not understand ?? Cry or laugh?
    We were born in 1941, and judging by the text, the end of the article was similar to this time, it wasn’t up to sentiment, and we didn’t understand who was right and who was to blame, we just looked at the nationality column and put them in cars.
    Whether it is right or wrong is difficult to judge. But the fate of the country was on the scales, and ethics at such a time was unacceptable luxury.
  15. 0
    26 October 2012 15: 03
    Dear carbofo, this is important, yes, the story is what it is, but we know about it that propaganda tells us. They killed a legitimate, generally not a bad ruler, a progressor, instead put a German in (German is not the point) and began a quiet occupation of Russia, Russia was thrown back in development for many years, and they make us believe that it was good for us.
    1. 0
      1 November 2012 09: 09
      Setrac,
      You yourself, then realized what he said ? what difference already!
      What was it was.
      We cannot be occupied, we can only assimilate, nature is like that.
  16. 0
    27 October 2012 02: 53
    The article is clearly propaganda, as the main goal has already been written above to instill a sense of guilt in Russians, they say they called the Germans and then deceived, crawled and threw them away. But why not talk about the reasons for forced deportation? Or did the author really decide to play the fool, deciding that the Germans' fault was only that they were Germans? There are no secrets in the reasons for the deportation, there were denunciations that a conspiracy was being prepared among the Germans, and therefore they decided not to shoot them all simply to be transported to remote areas, for their own safety. I hope no one needs to explain what the attitude of the Russians, and indeed all Soviet citizens, to the German nation in the territories of the victims of the Great Patriotic War was.
  17. bart74
    0
    19 November 2012 01: 44
    I myself am from Central Asia, Cossack blood. The best friend is a German by the name of Dribas, in German spreeh worse than me, they are great guys, although they got luli more than once from us!
  18. So you all write "It’s good that we didn’t shoot them, but only sent them away." Do you know how it really was? Gathered people and put on the ships. According to my grandmother, there were 4 ships in total. We sailed along the Volga to the Arctic Ocean. And then Russian planes flew in and began to bomb the ships! Tolley miracles didn’t hurt them, for some reason only 1 ship left on my grandmother’s ship, but 3 other ships sank !! And so they treated the deportees! It's almost the same as shooting!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"