The US Army will now allocate less funds for military uniforms for women than for men

42
The US Army will now allocate less funds for military uniforms for women than for men

According to the American media, against the backdrop of record inflation, as a result of which the cost of living has risen sharply, the cost of military uniforms for women will be cut.

Once a year, every US Army soldier receives a clothing allowance designed to replace or update their uniforms. The budget for the standard allowance for female military personnel is now being reduced from $561,78 to $507,48 for the new fiscal year beginning October 1st. At the same time, a similar allowance for men increased slightly - from $509,11 to $517,34.



According to the official version, funds for uniforms for women have been cut, as the price of the uniform itself has decreased slightly - by about $ 3,02. However, economists say that this is the slyness of the Pentagon, since there could not have been any drops in prices for uniforms lately.

The new allowances for men and women have been swapped for the first time in a long time, despite the ingrained belief that women typically spend more on their uniforms than men.

A 2021 U.S. Office of Public Accountability report stated that servicewomen pay approximately $8000 out of pocket over a 20-year career, twice what men pay.

Part of the reason for this difference is that women required additional uniform items during their careers, such as skirts for dress uniforms and maternity uniforms.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    6 October 2022 20: 20
    You will have to buy the pads yourself. Non-camouflaged.
    1. ZoV
      +3
      6 October 2022 20: 45
      Quote: Ural_engineer
      You will have to buy the pads yourself. Non-camouflaged.

      They will tear cotton wool from mattresses)))
      As noted by the American media, against the backdrop of record inflation, as a result of which the cost of living has risen sharply

      So much for Russia "gas station" and with the economy torn to shreds.!
      When the USSR and Russia were robbed, everything was fine .. Now everything was blocked and howled!
      while waiting
      By the way, if Russia redraws the supply of some resources and goods (about which the West is silent) There will be a collapse of the terrible economy of the West
      1. +3
        6 October 2022 22: 27
        They will fly in if this cotton wool is from a soldier's mattress!
        1. 0
          6 October 2022 22: 50
          Yes, everything is logical.
          Gay people need more for one cosmetic bag than for all the uniforms.
          Well, what about the women - shaved, and that's enough ...
    2. +1
      6 October 2022 20: 50
      Quote: Ural_engineer
      You will have to buy the pads yourself. Non-camouflaged.

      And right in the barracks to earn money on them. laughing
      1. +1
        6 October 2022 21: 15
        Rather, instead of pants, they will sew skirts, they require less fabric. And if you shout about inequality, the same skirts will be the same for the second half.
        1. +1
          6 October 2022 21: 27
          And if there are also MINI skirts, then definitely less fabric will be used for tailoring.
          1. 0
            6 October 2022 21: 50
            Quote: wandlitz
            And if there are also MINI skirts, then definitely less fabric will be used for tailoring.

            Why bother with skirts! Mini shorts - and order.
    3. +1
      6 October 2022 22: 37
      Quote: Ural_engineer
      You will have to buy the pads yourself. Non-camouflaged.

      You can use "used."
  2. +1
    6 October 2022 20: 22
    Give bare breasts wassat and the rest too wassat
    1. +1
      6 October 2022 20: 31
      It is forbidden! If you expose your chest and everything else - then everyone! And what percentage of breasts and other beautiful? BUT?
      1. +2
        6 October 2022 20: 50
        Yes, and without armor it’s impossible in any way, according to the contract
        1. +1
          6 October 2022 21: 41
          Quote: novel xnumx
          Yes, and without armor it’s impossible in any way, according to the contract

          It's time to patent transparent armor and sell the patent to the Mask.
          He can handle development. fellow
        2. +3
          7 October 2022 05: 29
          Quote: novel xnumx
          Yes, and without armor it’s impossible in any way, according to the contract

          Who has silicone, do not give out bronik laughing
      2. 0
        6 October 2022 20: 53
        Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
        It is forbidden! If you expose your chest and everything else - then everyone! And what percentage of breasts and other beautiful? BUT?

        And what is the medical board before concluding a contract for?
  3. +5
    6 October 2022 20: 22
    Fems are outraged! (too short message =)))
    1. 0
      7 October 2022 08: 40
      The size of clothes and shoes for men is usually larger than for women. Since the size is larger, then there is more material, therefore more expensive.
  4. +4
    6 October 2022 20: 23
    terrible discrimination ... at first, men were offended by compensating them less than women ... now it’s the other way around ... BUT but if you are a transgender)))) God forbid ... he’s like ... on average to compensate ... funny guys)))
    1. +2
      6 October 2022 20: 56
      Quote: silberwolf88
      BUT, if you are a transgender)))) God forbid ... how is he ... to compensate for the average ... cool guys)))

      By twice the average or according to the spectral coefficient. good
  5. 0
    6 October 2022 20: 36
    What a topical issue, both for the United States and for Russia! They laughed, such people cannot be defeated. laughing
    1. +2
      6 October 2022 20: 56
      Women without men become stupid, men without women become stupid, -Walter Scott, if memory serves, it was a long time ago, but nothing changes, it is gratifying, Ha-ha fool
  6. +3
    6 October 2022 20: 45
    -Yes, you are crazy
    Che, lace will not be?!?!?
    1. -1
      6 October 2022 21: 33
      How they enrage me. The wider the legs are spread, the more money. Drive out of Russia with a filthy broom.
  7. +3
    6 October 2022 20: 45
    Let them run around naked. And savings, and pleasing to the eye. bully
    1. +6
      6 October 2022 20: 52
      Big boobs will get in the way of spanking the machine, which can damage something
      1. +2
        6 October 2022 20: 56
        Big boobs will get in the way of spanking the machine, which can damage something

        This is how it is necessary to slap the machine gun with boobs to damage it? recourse
        1. +2
          6 October 2022 21: 52
          Quote: Ural_engineer
          This is how it is necessary to slap the machine gun with boobs to damage it?

          If they are inflated with silicone - what is the weight ?!
          1. +1
            7 October 2022 06: 26
            a bullet hits - everyone around is splashed with silicone.
  8. 0
    6 October 2022 20: 58
    Quote: Cat Alexandrovich
    It is forbidden! If you expose your chest and everything else - then everyone! And what percentage of breasts and other beautiful? BUT?

    We’ll just see) without showing and we won’t determine wassat
  9. 0
    6 October 2022 20: 59
    Quote: novel xnumx
    Yes, and without armor it’s impossible in any way, according to the contract

    Will the cutout in the armor work?
  10. +6
    6 October 2022 21: 06
    Let them take an example from the army of Israel, and the male eye is pleased. drinks
    1. 0
      6 October 2022 21: 25
      Israel is not a cold country, but in the USA it is not always possible to jump in a negligee. In Alaska, for example, the ladies will freeze! crying
      1. +2
        6 October 2022 21: 38
        Especially for you, winter version. lol
    2. +1
      6 October 2022 21: 29
      Quote: tralflot1832
      Let them take an example from the army of Israel, and the male eye is pleased.

      I would remove such a sentry! love Especially the one near the pyramid... tongue
    3. The comment was deleted.
  11. +1
    6 October 2022 21: 28
    against the background of record inflation, as a result of which the cost of living has risen sharply, the cost of military uniforms for women will be cut.

    Why does a woman need a uniform in the barracks? wassat Pants, helmet, pistol (empty!) - that's all the beauty! feel
  12. 0
    6 October 2022 22: 21
    It is unlikely that they will cut something necessary for a fighter. The maximum will remove minor things that are not included in the critically necessary minimum.
  13. 0
    6 October 2022 22: 37
    Why do they need so many clothes? Panties and top. And enough.
  14. -2
    7 October 2022 00: 01
    They are saving to pay off the public debt of $ 31,4 trillion. And they found that poor women have discredit!
  15. 0
    7 October 2022 06: 43
    It is not entirely clear what this article is for at all - if you purely joke about boobs and pussies, then the material is quite suitable. And if this is not only banter, but material claiming some informational value, then it would be nice to compare these figures with clothing allowances in the Russian army. But then it wouldn't be funny at all.
  16. 0
    7 October 2022 07: 54
    maternity uniform

    These savages did not try to give leave for this time?
  17. +1
    7 October 2022 08: 05
    We read between the lines - now you will buy expensive American ladies pads and tampex yourself, we do not have enough money for Ukraine.
  18. 0
    7 October 2022 09: 06
    So everything is right, first women should be cut then men, because somehow it is necessary to increase the budget for military medicine - the army pays for sex change operations (as they wrote here in VO), so there should not be any male-female in the army of yus, only transgenders or three two races so to speak lol and they have the same form.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"