The ex-ombudsman of Ukraine admitted to the pranksters that the authorities and intelligence asked her to spin fakes about the crimes of the RF Armed Forces
Famous Russian pranksters Vovan and Lexus continue to expose foreign politicians. The next target for the pranksters was the ex-ombudsman from Ukraine Lyudmila Denisova.
This time the "jokers" were talking on behalf of former US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul. During the conversation, the unsuspecting Denisova said that the Kyiv authorities and representatives of Ukrainian intelligence asked her to spin fakes about the crimes of the RF Armed Forces, which our military allegedly committed during the JMD.
According to the ex-Ombudsman, she repeatedly made relevant reports. At the same time, Denisova does not hide the fact that the lies she spreads about the Russian army were actively used by Ukrainian politicians in the course of negotiations with EU representatives regarding new supplies of military aid.
Tellingly, the former Ukrainian Ombudsman is not only proud of his "achievements" in the field of discrediting the RF Armed Forces, but also condemns Dmitry Lubinets, who took her post at the end of May. According to Denisova, she is unhappy that the current human rights activist refused to spread a fake about the prison, which the RF Armed Forces allegedly “equipped” right on the territory of the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant.
It is worth noting that in the first months of the Northern Military District Denisova was noted more than once with loud statements discrediting the Russian army. Some “filtration camps” were mentioned in the territories liberated by the Russian Armed Forces, cases of violence against Ukrainian women and other things invented by Kyiv propaganda stories. However, at the same time, the Ombudsman never cited a single piece of evidence of “terrible crimes” of the Russian military.
Recall that Denisova has held her post since 2018. According to the former human rights activist, the initiative to remove her came directly from the Office of the President. At the same time, she does not report on the possible reasons for the “distrust” on the part of the current authorities, whom the Ombudsman tried so hard to please. Earlier it was reported that Kyiv's partners from the EU insisted on her dismissal, who were, as they say, negatively impressed by the unsubstantiated nonsense that came out of Denisova's mouth and pen.
Information