Armed Forces of Ukraine struck HIMARS MLRS on the Antonovsky Bridge, some of the missiles were intercepted

Ukrainian armed formations dealt another blow to the Antonovsky bridge in Kherson. According to the city administration, the shelling was carried out from the American MLRS HIMARS.

Antonovsky bridge connects the left-bank Kherson with the right bank of the Dnieper. This structure has long been a target for Ukrainian artillery and MLRS, Kyiv set the task of bringing the bridge to a non-working state in order to prevent the transfer of Russian troops to the left bank. The bridge is constantly under fire, the bridge deck has received serious damage, excluding passage, but the bridge supports are still intact, no hits were noted on them.

This time, the Armed Forces of Ukraine fired six HIMSRS MLRS shells at the bridge, three missiles were intercepted by Russian air defense systems, and the other three still hit the bridge area. At the moment, there are no reports of damage, and no one was injured.

The enemy continues to fire at civilian targets in the city of Kherson, so at 16:40 the criminal Kyiv regime fired six HIMARS missiles at the Antonovsky bridge, three were shot down, and three hit the bridge area, according to preliminary information, there were no casualties

- said the emergency services of the region.

It is suggested that the Armed Forces of Ukraine will increase the number of strikes on the Antonovsky Bridge against the backdrop of the offensive that has begun in the direction of Nova Kakhovka, in order to exclude the option of transferring Russian troops that will go from the Crimea. In Kyiv, they understand that soon Russia will bring up reserves, the training and coordination of which is being completed, therefore they are trying to take the most advantageous positions before the counterattack and hinder the advance of the Russian Armed Forces, including by destroying bridges.

Comments

[Anachoret]

According to the Ukrainian press, fresh and inexperienced “mobiles” are already fighting in full swing in the Kherson direction, so the Armed Forces of Ukraine promise to quickly recapture the entire right bank of the region
And these mobiles, judging by the Ukrainian press, are actively depressing their wives into mobiles, and their wives in response scare them with Vanga predictions according to which the war, supposedly, will last right up to the end of 24 years)
In general, solid pseudo-mystical pride)

[ZoV]

Why did you write all this? You hope that now everyone here will rush to discuss all this is your cunning stuffing.
And the wives will start writing here right away that yes, that’s all, I’m the daughter of an officer, etc.

[Anachoret]

And what do you think, everyone should echo Konashenkov, how 80 tanks were destroyed in the Kherson direction, 30 aircraft and 40 bayraktars of the Kyiv junta were shot down, 20 highmars, 500000 tons of ammunition for them were destroyed by high-precision missile strikes and 10000 people of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were destroyed.
... The armed forces of the Russian Federation, with all this, left the Dudchans and regrouped to more advantageous positions ...
Only these positions are already about 30 kilometers from Berislav, and watching the toad jumps of the Vushniks, this is already at a distance of one such jump.
Therefore, I am reprinting the news from the TSN public that the ukrams have something to boast about, and at the same time it is completely incomprehensible what kind of impenetrable heresy is now happening with the General Staff of the Russian Ministry of Defense or are these covert attempts at a coup d'état?
PySy: falling asleep my previous post with minuses, the essence of the issue does not change and the highmars over the Antonov bridge do not go astray with the help of your minuses.

[Dimcor]

Well, most likely, the personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in Ukraine die a little more than Konashenkov announces, he does not take into account soldiers disabled by wounds, any collateral damage.

[Negro]

Seriously?

And how can Konashenkov GENERALLY know the losses of the enemy?

[Dimcor]

If you had beaten in the army, no one knows where, you would have been put on trial. Approximate losses are always known, even Ukraine itself does not know the exact losses. One hundred Ukrainians were buried there, there are another two hundred, but who counts them, according to the papers they are listed as alive, there are no problems with payments and an army of dead souls numbering over a million.

[Negro]

Quote from DimCorvus

If you had beaten in the army, no one knows where, you would have been put on trial.

Lol

Quote from DimCorvus

Estimated losses are always known

Only prisoners.

Quote from DimCorvus

A hundred Ukrainians dug there, there are another two hundred, but who counts them,

Well, you seem to be declaring that Konashenkov.

[Dimcor]

Quote: Negro

Only prisoners.

Prisoners are fixed exactly and not approximately.

[Negro]

Just about the prisoners, and the rest are not fixed at all.

[TAMBU]

Why today in the center of Zaporozhye hit the "stalnka" multi-apartment building? What is the whole entrance of "pravosekov"? To put it mildly, I doubt that anyone will go to court ...

[Dimcor]

Aren't you embarrassed that Ukraine reported on the S-300 missile? S-300! Anti-missiles hit over residential areas, and then oh something fell and exploded.

[TAMBU]

Kirill Tymoshenko is not the same as Ukraine reported ...

and one hit, it looks like an S-300, but to lay down the entrance in Stalin, even I doubt that they are capable ...

but perhaps they are themselves ... who will understand it. and I’m just talking about this and saying that trials are needed for the court, which is not always done ...

[Blacksmith 55]

The author of this writing still needs to learn geography.
Kherson is located on the RIGHT bank of the Dnieper.

[Thrifty]

I wonder when we will start hitting the bridges of the uk-roins? And why haven't these Himars been destroyed so far?

[Dimcor]

The combat power of Himras is lower than the ancient Grads (of course, their purpose is slightly different), you yourself see the third month or already the fourth they are hitting the bridge and hitting. Himras solve nothing in general. What's the point of focusing on them? Moreover, they are already destroyed when they come across.

[Negro]

Quote from DimCorvus

you see for yourself the third month or already the fourth they are hitting the bridge and hitting

1. And who told you that Grad is a good solution for a large bridge?
2. What to do if the Americans do not give large missiles, but they did not agree with the Koreans (who have a concrete-piercing version of the standard missile) for one reason or another. What is, so they beat.

Quote from DimCorvus

Moreover, they are already destroyed when they come across.

Did you destroy a lot?

[Liam]

Quote: Negro

for one reason or another, they did not agree with the Koreans (who have a concrete-piercing version of the standard missile).

This is the Antonovsky Bridge, if anything ...

[Negro]

I have seen. But with a specialized rocket it would be easier and faster.

[Liam]

Do you think that such ideally shaped holes leave non-specialized missiles

[Negro]

In general, yes, I think so. Specialized ones could break through the support, they go deep there for meters.

[Liam]

Non-specialized people do not leave such traces. There are ideally shaped holes in the canvas through and through. And there, with a good meter of concrete, reinforced concrete slabs and reinforcement.

Quote: Negro

Specialized could break through the support

Why support if it is enough to break through the canvas several times in a limited area, which happened.
Projectiles with such a flight path, even specialized ones, will not do anything special to supports

[poquello]

Quote: Negro

Did you destroy a lot?

lot

[Anachoret]

To be honest, I don't know either.)
After all, it is not so difficult to destroy railway bridges across the Dnieper and other significant rivers, traction substations, and all military logistics will be in a stupor (the bridge across the Zatoka is a vivid example of this, due to the destruction of which the bypass leg of supplies became much longer and more expensive.) the railway needed to be the first "denazify"
Or the key logistics center of Ukraine (bridges in Kyiv) and that’s it, Ukraine will no longer be up to the war against the backdrop of a humanitarian collapse

[dmi.pris1]

Destroying a traction substation is not a problem. But the bridge is a difficult target. They were built taking into account a possible war. But this does not mean that they cannot be destroyed. Why not destroyed?" A mess, sir "...

[Metallurg_2]

"Crap, sir"...

Contract, sir...

[Alexei]

Quote: Anchorite

After all, it is not so difficult to destroy railway bridges across the Dnieper and other significant rivers, traction substations, and all military logistics will be in a stupor (the bridge across the Zatoka is a vivid example of this, due to the destruction of which the bypass leg of supplies became much longer and more expensive.) the railway needed to be the first "denazify"

Are you the one who wants to prevent our Western partners from making money on the supply of weapons? And a businessman from you, my friend, is unimportant. Serious uncles treat the crisis with a contractual war, and you are here with your winning strategies ... I'm being ironic, if so. Hooray-patriotic minusologists, where are you?

[ZIF122]

It is of course obvious that it is necessary to destroy bridges and other infrastructures, but seeing that this has not been done since the beginning of the NWO, I think there is some kind of agreement - we do not hit your bridges, you are on our Crimean, something like that, otherwise there is simply no explanation!

[Eug]

The key logistics points are not bridges across the Dnieper, but little-known junction stations like Zdolbuniv, Kazatin, Kalinovka, relatively small bridges across Sluch, Goryn, Styr and others. It is very difficult to get across such a bridge - even a small KVO URO does not guarantee a hit, let alone critical destruction.

[Dimcor]

Bridges are not destroyed in order to then go on the attack on them, though there is a possibility that Ukraine itself will try to destroy them. So perhaps a little bit and should be subdivided.

[Negro]

Quote: Anchorite

After all, it is not so difficult to destroy railway bridges across the Dnieper and other significant rivers, traction substations, and all military logistics will be in a stupor

And how will this affect the damned highmars on the right bank of the Dnieper?

[Alien From]

When the KING whistles on the mountain, not earlier.

[Hypertension]

Quote: Anchorite

According to the Ukrainian press, fresh and inexperienced "mobiles" are already fighting in full swing in the Kherson direction

According to the Russian press, with reference to the military commander Kots, there are no "mobiks" yet, but they are expected.
A Russian fighter with the call sign "Cannibal" addressed the mobilized.

You must survive the first attack. We need to be mentally prepared, we are all ready to move forward. We are retreating now and we are worried about this, we need an offensive. Wait, come. From the 19th, out of 23 people, I have 7 people left, people are needed. Do not be afraid, together we will win!

https://lenta.ru/news/2022/10/04/lyudoed/
https://t.me/sashakots/36208

[Al manah]

From the 19th, out of 23 people, I have 7 people left, people are needed.

With this system, we will definitely win, I have no doubt!

[DymOk_v_dYmke]

Quote: Hyperion

Russian fighter with callsign "Cannibal" appealed to the mobilized.

The call sign, apparently, is not accidental.

[Metallurg_2]

And the phrase is alarming: out of 23 people, I have 7 left

[cmax]

Our air defense "trained, trained" for several months in a real war situation, but still 50% of the missiles were missed (from the message). Here, having no analogues of air defense and electronic warfare on the face. It is clear why the commander (former) moved his headquarters 150 km away. If closer, then neither the headquarters nor the commander would be left.

[Fizik13]

Quote: cmax

Our air defense "trained, trained" for several months in a real war situation, but still 50% of the missiles were missed (from the message).

Whine!
And you go and show how to work!

[Infinity]

The question here is not how to work. It's just that all these years it has been customary on VO and other sites to talk about the "unparalleled" air defense of Russia, and the overestimated air defense of Western countries. I remember how everyone laughed in 2019, when the Patriots could not shoot down all the drones and the KR in Saudi Arabia, and, they say, the Arabs should have taken ours, well, they would definitely have shot down everything! Well, well ... The truth is in the middle. There is no perfect air defense, but the townsfolk bought into the propaganda and believed in "unparalleled" complexes, which supposedly would not let a fly through.

[cmax]

Quote from Fizik13

Quote: cmax

Our air defense "trained, trained" for several months in a real war situation, but still 50% of the missiles were missed (from the message).

Whine!

, Here's what I know for sure, that our fools have not yet died out, with the roads it seems to have gotten better ..

Quote from Fizik13

And you go and show how to work

You are at the wrong address, contact us. Address higher, to those who for many years in the army received all the blessings from the Motherland, and in difficult times were not up to par. And I worked out my own, for 18 years I built gas pipelines in Siberia. The country received the currency. So arrange. I am a mechanical engineer, not a general.

[begemot20091]

You didn't build it alone. I also built cities like Strezhevoy, Kedrovoe (Pudino) ... But I had to visit Chernobyl and fight .. It's a pity, now they don't take 70 years, they refuse. And I can judge these events because I know some weapons very well for some reason ... But judging from the couch, not knowing the real events ... Better build gas pipelines or go to a vocational school (if knowledge allows) and teach the boys the right specialty. Evaluate what you can appreciate by virtue of your special knowledge.

[cmax]

Quote: begemot20091

You didn't build it alone. I also built cities like Strezhevoy, Kedrovoe (Pudino) ... But I had to visit Chernobyl and fight .. It's a pity, now they don't take 70 years, they refuse. And I can judge these events because I know some weapons very well for some reason ... But judging from the couch, not knowing the real events ... Better build gas pipelines or go to a vocational school (if knowledge allows) and teach the boys the right specialty. Evaluate what you can appreciate by virtue of your special knowledge.

I did not write that one built. What do you even want from me? He expressed his opinion on the work of air defense in this particular case. He estimated that three missiles out of 6 were not intercepted. This is not written on the couch, but in today's article. What's wrong? Who are you to give me advice on what to write, what not to write. Don't yell Hurray! You scream! !

[begemot20091]

Yes, I shouted my "cheers" 30 years ago. And I'm not going to teach you. Simply, I would like to know how many missiles the air defense should have shot down. I won't be surprised if these missiles were also "covered" by a volley from the "Grad"

[TAMBU]

that's all ... air defense should shoot down all missiles ...

[Lom_l]

Do not remind me what% of interception the Patriot RSZO has? They showed themselves perfectly in the SA when firing drones at oil storage facilities.

[cmax]

Quote from Lom_l

Do not remind me what% of interception the Patriot RSZO has? They showed themselves perfectly in the SA when firing drones at oil storage facilities.

What difference does it make what percentage the Patriot has. Here you will not care when you find yourself under fire. And to people, it doesn’t matter there either. The percentage of missiles shot down by the Patriot. The main thing is that the missiles were shot down here, now.

[Negro]

Quote from Lom_l

Do not remind me what% of interception the Patriot RSZO has?

Patriot does not intercept MLRS.

Quote from Lom_l

They showed themselves perfectly in the SA when firing drones at oil storage facilities.

Patriot does not intercept drones.

These tasks should be solved by air defense of other types.

[poquello]

Quote: cmax

anyway, 50% of the missiles were missed (from the message). Here, having no analogues of air defense and electronic warfare on the face.

amuses against the background of a completely leaky NATO air defense

[My doctor]

Quote: poquello

amuses against the background of a completely leaky NATO air defense

Air defense is the air force for the poor

[poquello]

Quote: MyVrach

Quote: poquello

amuses against the background of a completely leaky NATO air defense

Air defense is the air force for the poor

oh how thoughtful, are there examples when the NATO Air Force shoots down hailstones?

[Negro]

Quote: poquello

are there examples when the NATO Air Force shoots down hailstones?

The Air Force is not engaged in shooting down MLRS, but in the destruction of launchers. Ideally, factories where MLRS are produced.

[My doctor]

Quote: poquello

oh how thoughtful, are there examples when the NATO Air Force shoots down hailstones?

Yes, there is such an expression "air defense is an air force for the poor." By this it is meant that the task for the air defense forces coincides with one of the tasks of the air forces, this is protection from air attack.

[poquello]

Quote: MyVrach

Quote: poquello

oh how thoughtful, are there examples when the NATO Air Force shoots down hailstones?

Yes, there is such an expression "air defense is an air force for the poor." By this it is meant that the task for the air defense forces coincides with one of the tasks of the air forces, this is protection from air attack.

how old is this expression? at least the time when the moment31 was hunting for cruise missiles, well, look how easy it is now for the shells to shoot down the KR), though the dill with the defeat of the KR and with the Air Force and without the Air Force have problems, and I guess not everything goes smoothly for the bourgeois

[cmax]

Quote: poquello

Quote: cmax

anyway, 50% of the missiles were missed (from the message). Here, having no analogues of air defense and electronic warfare on the face.

amuses against the background of a completely leaky NATO air defense

Have you checked NATO air defenses? I don't think it's better not to. Deal with Ukrainians.

[poquello]

Quote: cmax

Have you checked NATO air defenses? I don't think it's better not to. Deal with Ukrainians.

Ukrainians shoot from purely Ukrainian hameris and speak Polish, English, French and Romanian - they are somehow strange

[Sarboz]

Quote: cmax

Have you checked NATO air defenses? I don't think it's better not to.

Yes, our younger comrade from the DPRK just checked the American air defense in Japan. They did not notice a ballistic missile that flew over Japan. From the word at all. Didn't even try to hit.

[Negro]

Quote: Sarboz

From the word at all. Didn't even try to hit.

The ballistic missiles that Kim launched over Japan every six months (with a break for Trump) have never been tried to shoot down. This would be a strange idea.

[Sarboz]

Quote: Negro

The ballistic missiles that Kim launched over Japan every six months (with a break for Trump) have never been tried to shoot down. This would be a strange idea.

Oh really? You tell this to our air defense officers, amuse the guys. An air target heading at great speed towards Japan must be shot down in the initial sections of the trajectory. Since there is no way to determine its further trajectory, the number and type of warheads. Such a target can hit several targets at once in Japan, say at American military bases, including nuclear warheads. And maybe fly further.
It would be a strange idea to miss ballistic targets flying over your head.

[Negro]

Quote: Sarboz

You tell this to our air defense officers, amuse the guys

Your air defense officers are not able to shoot down the IRBM. And laughter for no reason is a clear sign of someone.

Quote: Sarboz

An air target heading at great speed towards Japan must be shot down in the initial sections of the trajectory. Since there is no way to determine its further trajectory, the number and type of warheads

A ballistic target flies along a completely predictable trajectory - a ballistic one. And you can shoot it down only on a downward section.
It is not "air", but transatmospheric.

Quote: Sarboz

It would be a strange idea to miss ballistic targets flying over your head

Nevertheless, the Japanese live like this, and not for the first year. However, in recent years, opinions have begun to appear that it is time to decide something with the fat clown.

[poquello]

Quote: Negro

Your air defense officers are not able to shoot down the IRBM. And laughter for no reason

chatter for no reason is also a sign, but if you said - then yeah, they definitely don’t know how))))))))))))))))

[Negro]

Name one example of the defeat of the IRBM by the forces of the RF Armed Forces. Not a conditional target was conditionally hit, but at least one real downed Iskander.

[poquello]

Quote: Negro

Name one example of the defeat of the IRBM by the forces of the RF Armed Forces. Not a conditional target was conditionally hit, but at least one real downed Iskander.

) Iskander is not an IRBM, and the RF Armed Forces are not dill to shoot missiles by themselves

[Negro]

Quote: poquello

Iskander is not a BRSD

Yes, Iskander is a much simpler target. But at least Iskander.

Quote: poquello

and the RF Armed Forces are not dill so that by themselves

And who else would they shoot at? Ukrainian Scuds sawed Yushchenko, Atakms Joe has not yet sent. If the West in 91 became convinced that missile defense was a complex problem and worked in this direction for 30 years, then the Russian Federation for 30 years was overwriting about the unparalleled wunderwaffles of the Brezhnev era.

[poquello]

Quote: Negro

Iskander is a much easier target.

))))))))))))) and how many of them were shot down by pro-NATO soldiers?

Quote: Negro

If the West was convinced in 91 that missile defense is a complex problem and worked in this direction for 30 years

)))))))))))) and learned to shoot down satellites that the USSR was able to shoot down in Brezhnev times

[Negro]

Quote: poquello

how many were shot down by pro-NATO soldiers?

Who is this?

Quote: poquello

learned to shoot down satellites that the USSR was able to shoot down in the Brezhnev era

The first reliable test of the Russian anti-satellite system took place on November 15, 2021 (Cosmos-1408).
The Americans held the corresponding event on September 13, 1985 (Solwind).

[poquello]

Quote: Negro

Quote: poquello

how many were shot down by pro-NATO soldiers?

Who is this?

Americans French and British with their technique and trained dill

Quote: Negro

The first reliable test of the Russian anti-satellite system happened on November 15, 2021 (Kosmos-1408).

)))))))))))) systems? ))))))))) may be

[Negro]

Quote: poquello

systems? ))))))))) may be

Well, you see. You do not follow the real successes of the Russian missile defense system, as they are, at all.

Quote: poquello

Americans French and British with their technique and trained dill

For the first time I hear that someone has seen serious anti-missile systems in the demilitarization zone.

[poquello]

Quote: Negro

Quote: poquello

systems? ))))))))) may be

Well, you see. You do not follow the real successes of the Russian missile defense system, as they are, at all.

))))))))))) Why should I follow the systems, satellites in the USSR were shot down, probably not by systems)))))))))

Quote: Negro

Quote: poquello

Americans French and British with their technique and trained dill

For the first time I hear that someone has seen serious anti-missile systems in the demilitarization zone.

to show them like Abrams tanks, the bourgeois are more expensive for themselves, only to be dishonored

[Negro]

Quote: poquello

why should I monitor the systems, satellites in the USSR were shot down,

Satellites in the USSR, you see, did not shoot down at all. Unless when launching from the cosmodrome directly into the Pacific Ocean, but this knowledge of the grandfathers has not been lost even now.

Quote: poquello

to show them like Abrams tanks, the bourgeois are more expensive for themselves, only to be dishonored

More expensive or cheaper, but for now there are no systems on the theater of operations, there is nothing to talk about. Where they were - there they worked.

[poquello]

Quote: Negro

while there are no systems on the theater, there is nothing to talk about. Where they were - there they worked.

Duc, the tanks were on fire, the Patriots missed

[Negro]

Naturally missed. The difference between reality and fairy tales - no system gives a 100% guarantee. This is not a conditional defeat of a conditional target.

[poquello]

Quote: Negro

Naturally missed. The difference between reality and fairy tales - no system gives a 100% guarantee. This is not a conditional defeat of a conditional target.

) naturally this is a natural access system, this is for you))))))))) not s400

[Negro]

Quote: poquello

then you)))))))) not s400

By itself. In the case of the S-400, the fight against ballistic missiles is not structurally provided. Well, except that when the U-Points with a service life that has expired 20 years ago fall somewhere in the forest at random, one can declare a heroic downing.

[Sarboz]

Quote: Negro

Your air defense officers are not able to shoot down the IRBM.

Judging by your tone, your Bandera air defense officers can. And they can do everything.

Quote: Negro

A ballistic target flies along a completely predictable trajectory - a ballistic one. And you can shoot it down only on a downward section.
It is not "air", but transatmospheric.

A thrown stone moves along a ballistic trajectory. The trajectory of the rocket depends on how and in what parts of the flight the engines work. That is why after the launch, while the rocket is moving vertically upwards, it is impossible to calculate its trajectory. When it leaves the atmosphere, falls on a horizontal course, it’s too late to drink Borjomi, a couple of minutes of flight remains to Japan. But even at this moment it is not clear where the "descending section" will begin, whether it will attack Japan or an empty square far in the ocean.

Quote: Negro

However, in recent years, opinions have begun to appear that it is time to decide something with the fat clown.

And he's not a clown at all. Your overseas masters would have long ago twisted the neck of the “rocket man,” as Trump affectionately called him. But the arms are short. Trump didn't even try. Russia and China do not allow. So you can puff up your cheeks importantly, but the Americans dare not do anything with the DPRK.

[Negro]

Quote: Sarboz

Judging by your tone, your Bandera air defense officers can.

Of course not. 30 years of squandering the poor Soviet legacy led to a natural result. Even such an adversary as the Russian Aerospace Forces, stuck in the 70s, causes serious trouble.

Quote: Sarboz

That is why after the launch, while the rocket is moving vertically upwards, it is impossible to calculate its trajectory.

Exactly. Therefore, the conversation about missile defense begins in the downward section.

Quote: Sarboz

But even at this moment it is not clear where the "descending section" will begin,

You don't understand what you are talking about.

Quote: Sarboz

Your overseas masters would have long ago twisted the neck of the “rocket man,” as Trump affectionately called him

Twist the neck of this reserve them. Stalin should have been in the 90s. And now it's the problem of the Japanese and Koreans. Let's hope that they understand this at the level of Jews, and not at the level of Ukrainians.

[Kaufman]

Iris will be coming soon. Then we will realistically evaluate NATO air defense. In the meantime, where there are cheetahs, they shoot down Geraniums

[poquello]

Quote: kaufman

In the meantime, where there are cheetahs, they shoot down Geraniums

Kalash also probably shoot down, in any case, I saw a movie like they shot at geraniums)))))

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: cmax

We trained, trained "our air defense for several months in a real war situation, but still 50% of the missiles were missed

The bridge was put out of action a long time ago and, in theory, air defense should not cover it, but ferry (and other) crossings.

Quote: cmax

Here, having no analogues of air defense and electronic warfare on the face.

A MLRS projectile launched from a not very long distance is not the easiest target, it’s not handicrafts to shoot down over Tel Aviv.

Quote: cmax

It is clear why the commander (former)

Why did Lapin suddenly become a former?

Quote: cmax

moved his headquarters 150 km. If closer, then neither the headquarters nor the commander would be left.

Well, but his fighters write that they regularly saw him on the front lines. Probably, they are misinforming Kadyrov, who ... who himself was somewhere during the fighting in Liman?

[Gardamir]

Weird. When I wrote a few months ago. that it is necessary to shell bridges on Ukrainian territory. I was quite reasonably told that it was useless to shoot because they would restore it in half an hour. But Ukrainians do not read the VO website and shoot at bridges.

[Andrei from Chelyabinsk]

Quote: Gardamir

But Ukrainians do not read the VO website and shoot at bridges

And the Russian Federation - reads, and organizes pontoon and ferry crossings ....

[Negro]

Quote: Gardamir

I was quite reasonably told that it was useless to shoot because they would restore it in half an hour. But Ukrainians do not read the VO website and shoot at bridges.

Not half an hour, but a couple of days. So they fire every couple of days. This is called "keep under fire control."
But the possibility of the Russian Federation to spend missiles in such quantities for a long time is in question.

[Dimcor]

If the headquarters is a reliable Soviet building, Ukraine does not have weapons capable of destroying them. Yes, and "having no analogues" has very specific target interception coefficients, if these are helicopters, then the probability comes under 90%, missiles about 60% may be less, depending on the targets. Here you at least train, all the same, statistically, the goals will fly by.

[Voronezh]

50% is a very good result for the RSZO. You will not find 100% in any air defense system in the world. Dig for fun

[Hitriy Zhuk]

If only I could give you a bloody patriot, put you there and hammer 120 Hurricane missiles at you with a volley ...
To not carry garbage.

[Cat Alexandrovich]

"Caught in the area of ​​the bridge" ...
What is it like? Three meters from the bridge or a kilometer?.. Strange presentation of information...

[cold wind]

Quote: Cat Alexandrovich

"Caught in the area of ​​the bridge" ...
What is it like? Three meters from the bridge or a kilometer?.. Strange presentation of information...

There is a ferry crossing next to the bridge, it looks like they beat it.

[stonevender]

soon Russia will pull up the reserves, the training and coordination of which is being completed

And will they be superior to those who are regrouping now?

[impostor]

And will they be superior to those who are regrouping now?

And it already depends on you - who is on your hundred square meters: the Rzhev Memorial or Franklin ...

[Boris Sergeev]

But the RF Armed Forces do not strike at bridges across the Dnieper ...

[Lom_l]

And what is the use of the fact that the Armed Forces of Ukraine have been hitting the Antonov bridge for 2 or 3 months? Military trucks, periodically fall into the photo / video. And the bridges across the Dnieper need to be demolished by tactical nuclear weapons, I think everything else is a bunch of nothing.

[Al manah]

They probably understand that they will have to regroup along them ... with such and such leadership of this strange operation.

[Monster_Fat]

Everything is simple. Ukrainians act competently. The bridge has already been disabled and the movement of vehicles on it is impossible. Why spend extra ammunition on it - it is simply periodically "maintained" in a non-working state at a minimum cost, since the accuracy of Himarsov allows this to be done. In general, I doubt that at least some missiles were shot down, it’s just that some of them didn’t hit, and some, judging by the “cautious” term “three missiles hit the bridge area”, you understand ...

[poquello]

Quote: Monster_Fat

the benefit of Himarsov's accuracy allows you to do this. In general, I doubt that at least some missiles were shot down, just some did not hit

)))))) How is it? accuracy allows you to miss?

[Leonidych]

Who is stopping us from hitting and destroying their bridges so that they do not pull up equipment and reserves. Maybe it's some kind of cunning plan.

[Egoza]

Quote: leonidych

Maybe it's some kind of cunning plan.

"Do you have a plan, Mr. Fix? - Yes, I have a plan!" (cartoon) Everyone remembers how his cunning plans ended?

[Alexandr2637]

More and more inclined to....Putin=Gorbachev. Or maybe worse..

[Maki Avellevich]

Quote: Alexandr2637

More and more inclined to....Putin=Gorbachev. Or maybe worse..

No matter how I collect it, I get a Kalashnikov assault rifle. (C)

The leaders of the Russian people are what gives rise to the Russian people.
No more no less.

[Glory1974]

Who's stopping us from hitting and destroying their bridges

As experience shows, even pontoon crossings are difficult to destroy, they are quickly restored.

[gromit]

Ukrainian armed formations struck, sounds as stupid as "German armed formations attempted an offensive in the Ardennes"
It's called the armed forces. And they are at war.

Newspeak quickly slips into absurdity: "The so-called Armed Forces of Ukraine, the so-called Ukraine, as part of the so-called counter-offensive, launched a so-called strike in the area of ​​​​the so-called Antonovsky bridge, as a result, the so-called passage was excluded, so-called."

[Tuzik]

Quote from Gromit

Newspeak quickly slips into absurdity: "The so-called Armed Forces of Ukraine, the so-called Ukraine, as part of the so-called counter-offensive, launched a so-called strike in the area of ​​​​the so-called Antonovsky bridge, as a result, the so-called passage was excluded, so-called."

[Entropy]

for a long time, the mine of defense itself calls them "militants" from the very beginning

[Alexandr2637]

I don't care how much we managed to "intercept"! You tell me how many FAIL, And how long the arrivals will continue, fucking warriors!

[ZoV]

Ukrainian armed formations dealt another blow to the Antonovsky bridge in Kherson

They act in Anglo-Saxon, which is not surprising. They have been giving orders to NATO for a long time.

[Kaufman]

All the generals of Nata were captured in Azov Steel! Haven't you seen caps and tunics on TV? The labs are open too! Now there is a fight against Satanism! So don't break trends

[Tim]

[/ quote] A few words about the Kherson direction. The @wargonzoya project knows for sure, signals that the “Kharkov scenario” could happen there in one form or another have been coming from the ground for a long time. The commanders fighting in this direction - reported to the top about the problems. Shortage of personnel and ammunition. In response, as far as we know, they received comments in the spirit - "do not invent, everything is fine with you." That is, in our country, not only the highest generals do not hear simple officers. Often, even experienced generals who have real military merits and are by no means armchair authority in the troops are not heard. We are not protecting anyone. We state. It's time for us to learn to listen. Especially those in the field. [quote]

[Arsi55]

Most likely, the bridge was struck not only to prevent reinforcements, but also to prevent those who are now fleeing from the right bank from regrouping on the left bank. I can imagine the mood of the soldiers who are in Kherson, they are simply bypassed, and there will be nowhere to run ...

[poquello]

Quote: Arsi55

Most likely, the bridge was struck not only to prevent reinforcements, but also to prevent those who are now fleeing from the right bank from regrouping on the left bank. I can imagine the mood of the soldiers who are in Kherson, they are simply bypassed, and there will be nowhere to run ...

)))))))))))))) Are they broadcasting such noodles to you there?

[ratoborets]

The Hydra can only be defeated in one way. Mobilization is not 300 thousand, but 600-800 thousand. After training and coordination, send a part to strengthen and stabilize the front.
300-400 thousand together with contractors for a breakthrough from Belarus - the capture of the Volyn, Lvov and Transcarpathian regions. It is through the western border (Poland, Slovakia) that 90-95% of Western weapons go. Only by cutting off the supply of Western weapons can the hydra be defeated. At the same time, the breakthrough should not be stretched out for weeks or months (so that NATO does not urgently increase the supply of equipment), but is carried out in a matter of days with the maximum use of aviation and artillery. Pilots must understand that out of 20 attack aircraft / bombers, 1-2 may not return.

Otherwise, the Russian army will be boiled like frogs, and the jingoistic patriots will shout “this doesn’t change anything”, “we haven’t started yet”, etc. for every new delivery. And unlike our authorities, who have started or not yet ?, they have already mobilized their military-industrial complex and planned deliveries for several years in advance. Small Slovakia alone plans to supply 16 howitzers next year. An article about this on VO, as expected, many answered that "it does not significantly change anything." Only this is one small 5-millionth country, and in NATO there are 30 of them + Sweden, Finland !!! Can the Russian military-industrial complex produce howitzers at least at the level of Slovakia, taking into account our 145-150 million population - that's 480 howitzers???

[ratoborets]

If the supply from the West is cut off, then in a few months the Armed Forces of Ukraine, if no equipment (without maintenance and new supplies), will run out of ammunition and shells. And without them, all these himars-caesars are rubbish.
Without cutting the provision, sooner or later our navel may come loose (in other words, we won’t pull it). Russia is not the USSR, but NATO has grown and grown at the expense of Eastern Europe. Armed Forces officers calmly drive equipment back and forth for service in Poland, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia. And from the West come himars, Caesars, UAVs, tens of thousands of shells.

[donavi49]

Well, how are you going to cut off the supply? For example, open a map and highlight roads. Be surprised.

Bridges. How? KR - the bridge in Zatoka was hollowed out, hollowed out, a dozen different missiles were used up in it in 2 months, and as a result it now functions with restrictions, but it functions.

As for equipment, the next tranche is now suitable for the next reporting week (new Ramstein meeting).

The US is supplying 4 Himars, 16 M777s, 16 105mm light howitzers, 200 Maxpros, a lot of shells and ammunition.

The Europeans will also report and make statements next week. Especially given the current situation on the ground. The same Caesars + 6 pieces - the issue is resolved, and they are better than those that were supplied earlier, both in terms of base (4-axle Tatra) and in terms of functionality (more expensive and advanced version).

[Bully]

Well, how are you going to cut off the supply?

First you need to start fighting against Ukraine as a single organism, because the body, in addition to the hands (APU), also has a head and a liver and other important organs. And if you beat them properly, it will be very painful. For example, to begin with, strike at control centers at the level of RDU, ODU, CDU, as well as at nodal substations where APNU (automatic stability violation prevention) is implemented. I assure you it will be very painful. Chaos on a vast territory in the rear will be ensured. And without a rear, it is impossible to fully fight. Moreover, this task could be solved by the forces of the peacetime army without any mobilization.

[Lykases1]

You can call, of course. Only we can’t provide for those who have already been called up; those who have been mobilized buy their own equipment. They are located, sometimes, in a flat field. And you 600-800. This mobilization will last for a year. Here are the stupid Americans, before hitting Iraq, pulled 600-700 thousand people, about 4000 thousand tanks and an unmeasured amount of aircraft. Our General Staff calculated in its own way. Why should we look to others?

[ratoborets]

Shashechki you or go?
If only, yes, if only, if like the Americans, if they pulled it off right away, etc. It is necessary to proceed from the current situation and how to fix it, and not dream "if everything was done correctly."

Ukraine in a few months mobilized 600-800 thousand or 2-2.5% of the current population. If Russia cannot mobilize 0.4-0.5% of the present population (600-800 thousand), then what can we expect in a year?! If supplies are not cut off, then Hymars, Caesars, armored personnel carriers, shells, etc. will continue to come all year and in a year the situation will only get worse.
If, however, the supply is cut off through Western Ukraine, albeit through "I can't", then Ukrainian resistance will be enough for exactly 2-3 months, until the shells run out and equipment fails without maintenance. And if you also cut off the supply of fuel and lubricants, then even earlier.

[Lykases1]

I do argue. We need to shut down supplies. But how to put it in the heads of MO? The same United States, with four hundred tomohawks, multiplied the air defense systems by zero and brought countries to their knees. And we fired thousands of missiles - in Ukraine, as before, there is air defense, light, heat and water. Logistics is not broken. Here's how to call it? And mobilization is needed, but they were not ready for it, despite the trillions of rubles poured in. And thanks to the actions of our leadership, the specter of defeat loomed.

[ratoborets]

Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye. Unfortunately, that's how it is.

[acetophenone]

In Kyiv, they understand that soon Russia will bring up reserves, the training and coordination of which is being completed, therefore they are trying to take the most advantageous positions before the counterattack and hinder the advance of the Russian Armed Forces, including by destroying bridges.

But in Moscow they don't understand that it is necessary to destroy the bridges... Strange, isn't it?

[To state]

Something else is strange .... our GSh. is he WHO? And who does he work for?

[Yapet100]

But is it not clear whose General Staff There is no need to guess, the results of the General Staff leadership speak for themselves. Every day we already read: "Retreated, leveled, reformatted and so on ....". Gerasimov himself, probably, does not believe in the Russian military doctrine he wrote ...

[donavi49]

Judging by the latest statements of the Armed Forces of Ukraine at Melovoy. Directly from there 37 km to the dam. The main next line of defense is probably a little further at the next inflow with an embankment-bridge - Novokaira. Already, this milestone will allow you to comfortably work with 155/52 caliber (Caesar, for example) along Kakhovka, accumulation zones, ferries and pontoon bridges. This is probably the minimum task of this stage.

[iouris]

Sooner or later (now sooner than later) the bridge will be destroyed. We must go further, but not with the same strength. And manpower and equipment keep coming from the West.

[ASM]

Okay, we managed to intercept a part, but where is the aircraft that would have destroyed the launchers even at the time of redeployment?

[gafovec]

She is in the Donbass. Accelerates release.

[EFIM LYUBIN]

ratoborets (Ratoborets), but what about those who do not want to lose what was stolen from the people and hidden in Western banks, they do not want that! They spit on the country and the people who robbed and robbed! That is why such strange things are happening in the Kremlin! Protect the property of Western "partners", as government officials like to say! Well, what about our own people... As they always said in the power structures of the Russian Empire and the USSR, and how those in power seem to think now - "there are a lot of women in Russia - they still give birth to soldiers!"

[RaccoonSnake]

And is Lapin also to blame for the collapse that has begun near Kherson?

[Boniface]

We fight like in another reality!
The enemy is constantly bombing bridges, warehouses, command posts, supply routes!
Well, but WE are waging war (oh, forgive the NWO) in another dimension - we send missiles to no one knows where and for no reason, we guard all transport hubs and interchanges, the CPR is intact

you can downvote - I’m looking here at MY Evaluative Opinion, which runs counter to the general “approval” scares everyone!

[JagerRock]

The interception was carried out by the bridge itself, judging by the video

[Scientist_]

Armed Forces of Ukraine struck MLRS HIMARS on Antonovsky bridge

. Why don't our people hit their bridges?

[gafovec]

We have not yet expressed concern, and it seems that negotiations have not been offered

[gafovec]

3 missiles were shot down, 3 missiles hit the bridge ... In principle, excellent efficiency ... for the shooters.

[Dikson]

Amazing thing, right? These are the plans of the command - to retreat. And then - attack. If possible. And if it doesn't work, back off again. If only they didn’t run out of pencils there, red and blue - draw all sorts of arrows on their cards. Well, as it should be, according to the charter.