President of Bolivia told the whole truth about US diplomacy

34
President of Bolivia told the whole truth about US diplomacyIn public speeches, the President of Bolivia, Evo Morales, carefully treats the vocabulary used, the accuracy of thoughts, and the observance of political correctness. Such self-control is necessary, since Morales has enough enemies. In the US information war against the Indian president of Bolivia, everything is used to remind once again that he "does not correspond to" his high position. Particularly fierce attacks are carried out through the channels of "black propaganda" with an emphasis on the "racial inferiority" of the Bolivian leader.

Recently, speaking in La Paz with a speech on the occasion of the Day of Decolonization - as the date of discovery of America is called in Bolivia - Evo Morales finally answered the constant attacks of Washington civilizers with all Indian directness: "Previously, those who had good connections ( US embassy) were omnipotent, admired, and many army and police officers went there to establish good relations (with the Americans). But today, pardon the expression, having connections with the US embassy is the same as plunging into excrement. ” Today, according to Morales, both police and military fear contacts with the US embassy, ​​since such proximity is negatively perceived by Bolivians, is a compromising factor. American diplomats are increasingly seen as enemies of the people and the state. The previous governments depended on the United States embassy, ​​which "practically appointed ministers and authorized the nomination of police and army officers to command positions." With this practice, the government of Morales is finished forever.

The next day, speaking in the city of Santa Cruz at a ceremonial meeting on the 630 meeting of young doctors who completed their studies in Cuba, Morales returned to the question of the relationship between the United States and Bolivia. “Over the years, 50,” he said, “the United States has been able to impose on us, our country, asymmetrical, disrespectful, malicious, dominant and hegemonic ties.” According to Morales, Washington never wondered about the development of Bolivia and offered such “cooperation” programs that impeded progress, perpetuated the country's dependence. Morales touched on the topic of the fight against drug trafficking. The President believes that Washington has never really sought to ensure that drug cartels suffered defeat in Bolivia. The US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) strategy in the country was based on the principle “the more drugs, the more reasons to intervene”, “ideological and political subordination (to Washington) of the Bolivian army and police”. The United States did everything to turn the country into a “political pawn” operating within the framework of the imperial doctrine of “global security”. Under these conditions, the natural resources of Bolivia would be at the disposal of the United States.

The prospect of relations with the United States, according to Morales, does not promise anything good: they will never forgive the nationalization of hydrocarbon deposits. Previously, the gringos lent money and demanded to follow their political prescriptions. Since 2006, when Morales first won the presidential election, this black tradition has ended. Restoration of sovereignty, genuine independence, independent financial and economic policy, the course towards building a socialist multinational state - all this contradicts the interests of the United States. Morales is sure that for this reason the repressions of Washington began, the permanent policy of conspiracies and conspiracies: “The United States has never been interested in Bolivia becoming a democratic, socially just state with a high activity of citizens. On the contrary, the United States did everything to divide (our people), push us together. ” According to Morales, Philip Goldberg, a destabilization expert, was sent to Bolivia to implement this plan: “He arrived in the country after the split of Yugoslavia, inciting racial hatred, and civil wars with thousands of victims. Goldberg wanted Bolivia to turn into Yugoslavia, and therefore personally led (rousing) the internal confrontation. ”

President Morales constantly reminds compatriots of the facts of the subversive activities of the US Embassy. The Constitutional Assembly was sabotaged, separatism was encouraged in the five provinces of Bolivia, where the main hydrocarbon reserves are located and 75-80% of GDP is produced. Despite the results of the referendum - two thirds of the Bolivians supported the social and political course of Evo Morales! - American diplomats and agents, following instructions from Washington, carried out methodical, unprecedented in scale, work to split the country. Millions of dollars were spent on these goals. Through USAID, “shock” youth groups were created, rallies and demonstrations were funded, NGOs were incited to radicalize actions. The plane of the American Embassy was used to transport oppositionists to the departments of Beni and Pando in order to block the airports and to prevent the arrival of Evo Morales, who was trying to normalize the situation. In September 2008, the president of Bolivia announced the expulsion of Ambassador Goldberg, accusing him of assisting the separatist movements in the country. Were also expelled by employees of the DEA, who, like the CIA, recruited among the military and the police, monitored the movements of President Morales. The security service evaluated the intensification of this surveillance as a sign of the preparation of the assassination. “It was only after the expulsion of the ambassador of the United States,” said Morales, “that we managed to slow down these deep and purposeful maneuvers, the conspiracy against the process of change. I want to confirm that I do not regret (about the decision made) and I am proud that in the name of the dignity and sovereignty of Bolivia, the ambassador was expelled. ”

Nevertheless, the destructive operations of the US embassy continue. Known transfer facts weapons In the vehicles with American diplomatic numbers, episodes of incitement of Indian communities to protest against the government were documented; an attempt was made to infiltrate into the territory of Bolivia a terrorist group formed by the CIA from its agents in a number of countries in Eastern and Western Europe. Almost all the members of this group were "combat run-in" in the Balkans. Some of the terrorists were eliminated as a result of a special operation by the Bolivian police, others - after three years of investigation - were tried. It should be noted that from the 39 group members, militants and accomplices, 17 managed to escape from Bolivia and are currently hiding in the United States. The defendants receive financial and propaganda support through various “channels of influence”. The US Embassy closely monitors the trial, trying to present it as “politically beneficial” to the Morales government “staging”.

At the end of 2011, Bolivia decided to restore diplomatic relations with the United States in full. After consultations, approvals, adjustments to the project, a framework agreement was signed. The return of ambassadors to Washington and La Paz was also planned. In January, 2012 signed an agreement to combat drug trafficking. In February - an agreement on bilateral cooperation. However, 7 March 2012, the convergence process was interrupted: the United States in its certification document on the fight against drug trafficking qualified the efforts of Bolivia as “failures”. In March 2012, after his speech before the UN Commission on Drugs in Vienna, Morales, at a press conference, accused the DEA of illegal activities in Bolivia. Despite the successes in exposing drug organizations, intercepting drug carriers, arresting criminals, the DEA once again “did not certify” Bolivia. Morales took it as a blatant attempt at pressure: “Americans are always belittling our successes in this area, although the UN recognizes our achievements. The DEA is a political tool of the United States, always ready to give out negative information. DEA operations serve to compromise politicians and trade union anti-imperialist leaders. It is for this reason that we expelled the DEA. ”

Bolivia intends to put an end to its relations with USAID and its associated National Endowment for Democracy and the International Republican Institute. They stimulate campaigns hostile to the government and finance non-governmental organizations. Among the most hostile are the Youth for Development Association, the Institute for Development and Manageability, the Organization for the Training of Human Rights Defenders and others. Over the years of activity in the country, USAID has created an active “fifth column” of the intellectual elite, journalists, and students. USAID has analytical laboratories in Bolivia in which "imported" and local experts develop scenarios for attacking the government. The USAID director in Bolivia is Vane Nilsesthueen, who performs representational functions, but a team of CIA operatives with diplomatic passports operates under his cover. The residency of the CIA itself is called the “political section” of the embassy. The Bolivian counterintelligence is well aware of who is who on this team. The resident is Geoffrey Schadrak, the employees, who are politically and economically, are mostly young guys - Richmond Blake, Robert Crotty, Eric Kamus, Eric Whittington and others. The embassy has representatives of the main special services of the USA, including military intelligence.

Chargé d’affaires in Bolivia since July of this year. is Larry Memmot. His diplomatic career began in 1987: he served as vice consul in La Paz. Further Memmot specialized mainly in Latin America. In 2008 - 2011 He happened to work in the capitals of the former Soviet republics: in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, where knowledge of the Russian language was useful. Of course, Memmot, without any sympathy, belongs to the “populist regime” of the Indian president, but he is a romantic man, outwardly resembles those of Tsereushnikov who torture people in secret prisons around the world. It is more common for him to (rarely) have free time from diplomatic espionage to travel around the country and make photo reports. He even runs a blog to share his impressions of the country.

The question is whether Memmot and his colleagues will be able to complete the business trip to the end without serious conflicts with the government of Bolivia? Evo Morales warned recently: “Bolivia is an anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist, anti-liberal country. If the embassy of the United States will disturb Bolivia, as it has done so far, I warn you that we will have no choice but to close it at all. ” President Morales doesn’t disagree with the matter, especially since we now know well what the perception of Evo is inspired by US diplomacy.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    24 October 2012 06: 29
    Good receiver of a respected Chavez. Well, if you track the last 10 years, then in Latin America, more and more dissatisfaction with US policy is growing. you can wish to continue to look at the world with a sober look.
    1. raf
      +2
      24 October 2012 06: 35
      which receiver? Chavez is the president of Venezuela, and Morales is the president of Bolivia!
      1. sv-sakh
        +6
        24 October 2012 07: 20
        wink it does not matter)))))))
        1. 755962
          +9
          24 October 2012 10: 23
          liaising with the U.S. Embassy is like getting into excrement

          EXACTLY"...
          1. CEO
            CEO
            +3
            24 October 2012 11: 35
            Morales Krasava. The uterus cuts the truth.
            1. 0
              24 October 2012 19: 22
              The main thing is that he did not start yesterday, he has been rolling a barrel for a long time on Americans, and there’s nothing for him! The Americans are weakening, they have not long left.
  2. +13
    24 October 2012 06: 34
    the mere closure of the US embassies around the world could significantly enhance stability in all countries ... and if you even close the embassies of filthy shaving, the positive effect will increase by multiple ...
    1. Vanek
      +2
      24 October 2012 06: 38
      Quote: Krilion
      closure of US embassies alone


      Or maybe they (the United States) simply isolate from the rest of the world?
      1. +2
        24 October 2012 07: 20
        Correctly. Quarantine as a dangerous infection. And then we'll see how the healing process goes.
        1. +2
          24 October 2012 07: 48
          The blockade is for ten years, and all the drug trafficking from Latin America and Afghanistan to the place of food products.
      2. +1
        24 October 2012 08: 23
        Yes, it’s too late to isolate them. Most likely they themselves will disappear from the political arena. They have already launched the self-liquidation process and now it all depends on how much energy the flywheel has, which so far keeps the United States afloat. But, as the saying goes, shit never drowns, but it can dissolve. to disintegrate into pieces, which will not bring inconvenience to the rest of the world.
      3. Kaa
        +1
        24 October 2012 11: 17
        Quote: Vanek
        Or maybe they (the United States) simply isolate from the rest of the world?

        A. Sakharov also proposed an ingenious method of "water purification of the US territory" in this regard, until he switched to "human rights defenders, why, I wonder?"
        This isolation is just right ...
    2. +4
      24 October 2012 10: 23
      Yesterday I watched the debate of Romney and Obama, they are both so stupid that in the open all their plans and rotten insides showed. They are already openly saying that they are not climbing into Syria for democracy, but to get the government to be friendly to the United States, and why they climbed into Syria, because this is a direct route to Iran, about how the people live there, what their standard of living is they didn’t even stutter, they’re already talking openly. Then they are still outraged that we and the Chinese are vetoing, it’s time to speak openly, the time for games is over, now decisive measures are needed. By the way, here is a review of the debate.
    3. 0
      24 October 2012 13: 14
      Krilion,
      Closing the embassy of an enemy or "partner" in Putin's way is not diplomatic. It is necessary to recall the experience of the Union. Limit their opportunities.
  3. Vanek
    +3
    24 October 2012 06: 36
    This is called "boiling."

    People are slowly beginning to understand that the United States is the root of the problems in the whole decent world. They may now ask: - What did the USA do wrong? I will answer: - It may not be bad, but good too. Well, if only the movie "Terminator 2" watched it almost 216 times.
    1. bask
      +5
      24 October 2012 07: 29
      Vanek .. the root of the problems with the USA lies in the fact that they are trying to impose on the whole world their ... gay and tolerant ,,, culture, it’s just that people around the world are tired of being their ,, slaves ,,,, and suppliers of natural Moroalis in Bolivia, having come to power, immediately nationalized all oil companies and made them state..property..Pochkkm GDP can’t do this. It’s time to turn to the people ,, face ,, enough of the aligarchs ,, pump up ,, money from them and so d ..... i
    2. mnn_12
      +2
      24 October 2012 11: 32
      Believe me, we’ve done a lot of bad things. At least in Bulgaria - the destruction and plunder of national economy, demographic disruption, the value, moral and cultural degradation of society, total corruption and control of the political elite. All that Morales speaks about has been accomplished with complete success. Praise Morales for having pre-installed this predatory policy in his country.
      1. 0
        24 October 2012 18: 55
        And the Soviet Union at one time bought giant Bulgarian cars in gigantic parties - I have never seen others in warehouses. They smoked too - I’ll remember Rhodope, edelweiss, Opal, stevardess, TU-134 and others.
        If I’m not mistaken, the whole West in Bulgaria has safely taken over. I hope that everyone has learned the lessons.
        1. mnn_12
          0
          24 October 2012 20: 02
          The simple truth is that it was a mutually beneficial system in which everyone had their own contribution. Of course, there were problems, but they are against the background of everything that followed simply nothing. Just the mind is not enough how naive we all were, headed by Mikhail Sergeyevich. It destroys forest and hails - very hard ...
          During the USSR, Bulgaria had a place in world politics despite the dominance of the Moscow line. Now Bulgaria simply does not have a foreign policy. State she is only on paper.
  4. +6
    24 October 2012 06: 40
    Evo Morales, like Hugo Chavez, are leaders of countries that openly, without flirting, try to build (profitable for themselves) or terminate relations with the United States. The behavior of these leaders is truly admirable. Many of the former Warsaw Pact countries, and the former Soviet republics, are eager to join NATO and EURO, trying to enlist the support of the United States, and all states essentially went the same way as Bolivia, but the conclusions from all this were completely different. Learning from the mistakes of others is one of the components of success.
  5. vladsolo56
    +3
    24 October 2012 06: 41
    An interesting picture of the presidents of such small states can openly tell the whole truth about US policy, but niche leaders pretend that the United States is our true friend and ally. As you can call the head of the country who bows to the enemies, that the US knows us as enemies, after all, politicians in America do not hide this.
    1. late
      +3
      24 October 2012 09: 49
      Our leaders are moving away from a direct clash with the West, preferring not to waste time and energy in Russia, because time is now playing against the United States. TAKE PATIENCE - AND BEFORE YOU WILL BE BORNING THE BODY OF YOUR ENEMY.
  6. Lech e-mine
    +13
    24 October 2012 06: 48
    But today, sorry for the expression, having ties to the US embassy is like getting into excrement. ”

    VERY TRUE Phrase - this is especially true for OUR OPPOSITION (all smeared in excrement)
    1. +6
      24 October 2012 07: 21
      So she is already made up of extremities.
  7. merkel1961
    +3
    24 October 2012 07: 02
    It reads well: the US AID, it seems, in reality, is like the "States-messengers of the underworld"! This is confirmed by all their activities in the world on chaos, kindling all world fires.
  8. Pit
    Pit
    +2
    24 October 2012 07: 23
    There will never be a color revolution in the United States, because not there
    embassies of the usa.
    1. +2
      24 October 2012 07: 37
      Most likely there will be a blue revolution.
      1. Vanek
        +2
        24 October 2012 07: 46
        Quote: v53993
        Most likely there will be a blue revolution.


        It's hard to imagine what kind of slogans there will be and what they will hold in their hands, well, these ... revolutionaries.

        If usually stones, sticks, etc.
        1. Jin
          0
          24 October 2012 13: 48
          Well, you guys are burning, for a long time so did not laugh !!! laughing Beauties! Plus!
      2. sq
        +3
        24 October 2012 11: 15
        and the first to be crushed by sex shops .... to master the "weapon"
    2. +2
      24 October 2012 08: 11
      Very accurately +++++ noticed.
    3. Jin
      0
      24 October 2012 13: 47
      Quote: Pit
      There will never be a color revolution in the United States, because not there
      embassies of the usa.


      I understood a joke of humor! laughing
  9. +1
    24 October 2012 07: 49
    the point is that the amers got all their insolence, behave like the owners of this planet, this is wrong ...
  10. +2
    24 October 2012 09: 13
    Morales, Chavez - who is the next presidential regiment looking soberly at the United States?
    The process of liberation from state dependence has begun and it is difficult to stop it!
  11. Gorchakov
    +1
    24 October 2012 10: 27
    I think and hope that someday the time will come and we will hear such sayings from the lips of our president ... I think that it is still early, but everything is moving towards this ....
  12. 0
    24 October 2012 10: 31
    Yes, indeed: the peoples of Latin America demonstrate a sense of self-worth to the Americans and the whole world.
    Against this background, the behavior of the governments of Eastern Europe and the CIS countries (with the exception of the people's government in Belarus) and the peoples who chose them - exchanged the birthright for genetically modified lentil soup really looks pathetic.
  13. wolverine7778
    0
    24 October 2012 11: 40
    Morales was simply tired of being reckoned with and taken seriously as President of Bolivia and the country, he decided to express grievances in front of the Washington regional party committee, he does not understand that for the USA he is like talking with an empty phone, this is when during the period of racial segregation in the USA at 60 years, if a Negro officer, then for whites he was still a niger, why should he humiliate himself, it may be easier to break off relations with the USA and make friends with more supportive countries Venezuela, Cuba, Brazil, etc.)
  14. 0
    24 October 2012 12: 10
    Heh heh, there is another USAID country pointing to the door. Well done guys, keep it up. It's time to kick the already presumptuous stars, otherwise their "star" disease is progressing exponentially.
  15. 0
    24 October 2012 13: 42
    But today, sorry for the expression, having ties to the US Embassy is like getting into excrement
    100% support !!!
  16. Jin
    0
    24 October 2012 13: 44
    Morales is beautiful! laughing Do not poke Americans foot in the ass! Sensible approach! GDP has something to learn from overseas colleagues smile
  17. wax
    +1
    24 October 2012 14: 12
    Indians in respect of honor and conscience are head and shoulders above Amnrikans and other Anglo-Saxons.
    For any leader, compliance with treaties and obligations is a matter of honor. Therefore, the Indians, agreeing to land concessions, never violated the treaties unilaterally (with the exception of cases when land was sold without the consent of the entire tribe). However, the United States violated 99% of all contracts concluded with the Indians.
    “Faced not only armed people (some with bows and arrows, others with guns), but also very, very different worldviews,” writes V. Vardugin in the introduction to the book “Myths and Legends of America”. - In White, pushing his neighbors out with his elbows, getting rich at any cost is considered natural and unobstructed. For the Indians, the passion for profit, greed, especially accumulation at the expense of a poor neighbor, is considered the most despicable of the conditions that one can only reach. It’s shameful to have food in the house if the neighbors don’t have it ... ”
  18. phantom359
    0
    24 October 2012 17: 16
    Well done Morales. He called America what it really is.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"