Operation "Hour of the Bull": we are approaching the culmination point
History is a process of raising the level of morality
As you know, "The Hour of the Bull" is the title of the main novel of our outstanding science fiction writer Ivan Efremov (written in 1968). Speaking about the novel, experts usually note that it raises questions about the future development of human society under communism and people's lives under oligarchic capitalism. Yes this is correct. But that's not all.
Efremov offers another line, which has so far remained somehow outside the brackets: the question of assistance to the inhabitants of planets that are at a relatively low level of development - from higher civilizations. In our case, this is help to earthlings from the curators of mankind, in particular, representatives of the Pleiades star system. They participated in their time in the creation of Homo sapiens on planet Earth and therefore consider themselves responsible for us today.
This help, of course, has its own strategic goal, which is determined by the intention of the Creator. This help unfolds as a kind of scenario of one or another duration, proposed for a certain country, during which this country first undergoes training, and then is brought to the frontier from which its universal mission begins.
Operation "Hour of the Bull" I conditionally call the scenario that was once launched against Russia.
However, first, what is the strategic goal pursued by our curators.
Here are its main parameters. All human story is the process of raising the level of morality in society. It has three entry levels.
First level. Man is essentially an animal. The psychological orientation "service to self" operates. Behavior is motivated mainly by innate instincts; man is focused on own interest.
Second level. The service-to-self orientation begins to blur. A person works more or less honestly, but - for the sake of satisfying needs its families, his business. It is at this level that what is called traditional values.
Third level. Instincts no longer dominate. The psychological orientation "service to others" is being formed. There is a willingness to act in the interests of their country, which, however, is accompanied by sincere respect for other peoples. Such a person cannot be bought. Strictly speaking, the individual becomes personality from the third level of morality.
However, ordinary people on their own can only achieve second level of morality. And a large-scale process of raising the inhabitants of a particular country to the third level is possible only if this country "enters into resonance" with the frequency of the radiating structure from the center of our Milky Way galaxy. Astronomers call this structure - "Sagittarius A*".
[In Christianity, it is called God the Son. In Hinduism, it is Vishnu. In European esotericism, it is the "Central Spiritual Sun of the Milky Way".]
Therefore, as part of the assistance from the curators 2000 years ago, the inhabitants of Western Europe received Christianity. It allowed the necessary adjustments to be made. However, problems gradually emerged.
In particular, it turned out that the third level of morality is formed only among those who deeply believe in Christian postulates, and that an ordinary person is not able to achieve such a degree of faith. However, they found a way out: to ensure his regular participation in church ceremonies. What was achieved by coercion (and even violence). So in the countries of Europe a totalitarian social structure was formed.
In addition, Christian ideas eventually formed a type of person who was not ready to take responsibility for himself and for others. After all, people were given such a basic meaning: only God has true value; a person depends on Him in everything, a person’s earthly life is nothing more than a preparation for the Supreme Court.
Gradually bringing new actors onto the stage - the curators initiated the emergence of an alternative complex - "culture of the Enlightenment". He gave a new basic meaning: everyone decides for himself whether to believe in God, since a person is free to choose his actions. What happened to the moral and psychological atmosphere?
It (compared to the previous era) has changed dramatically. People have lost the rigid external motivation of behavior (in particular, the fear of hellish torments after death). People got freedom of choice. Power in the eyes of people has lost its sacredness: now its representatives are just hired managers who receive a salary from taxes from the population.
However, the question arose: how to manage people in these conditions? The answer has been found. Around the XNUMXth century, market democracies began to take shape in Europe, based on a system of checks and balances. Plus, the invisible hand of the market (ideally) was designed to regulate production on the basis of fair competition of equal producers.
Over time, a moral and psychological type has developed in Europe "personality of the Enlightenment". This is a person who has received a good education, has a developed sense of self-worth, considers freedom of choice to be the highest value, is psychologically ready to make decisions and be responsible for them, knowing that everyone's personality is valuable in itself. In addition, mechanisms for effective control over the elected authorities by civil society have been formed. There was nothing else on Earth that could be called the Age of Enlightenment. Therefore, the results achieved within the framework of the Enlightenment culture complex are the property of all mankind. And everything must be done to ensure that the moral and psychological type of “a man of the Enlightenment” would not be lost.
However, today the Enlightenment project exhausted its creative potential: the rapid growth of consumer sentiment and various manifestations of immorality in the West show that a huge mass of people no longer form the third level of morality. Everything is decided by three (and often two!) lower chakras.
Why? Because by becoming postChristian, Western society has left the corridor of Christian postulates and thus gradually lost setting to the Sagittarius A* frequency. And this is the boundary: it is impossible to continue like this.
It is possible to radically change this situation only through value synthesis, about which the Russian thinker Vladimir Solovyov wrote at the end of the XNUMXth century. This is its essence: the people of the Age of Enlightenment must regain the Higher Guidance. [T. i.e., using our terminology, re-tune to the frequency of Sagittarius A*.]
What is fundamental here is that only non-religious attunement is needed. After all, any option, again based on religious postulates, would immediately come into confrontation with both Christianity and Islam. Or with the basic ideas of the Enlightenment.
This setup has been suggested. And even its practical development began - in October 1917. Russia became its center.
I will explain. The structure of Sagittarius A* contains the goal of human development. Here it is in general terms: to provide conditions for the endless reproduction of full-fledged humanity. Hence, in particular: the economy functions not for the sake of profit, but for the sake of creating conditions for the physical, intellectual, spiritual and moral development of each person.
As you can see, this is one of the components communist ideal. Therefore, the non-religious way of tuning to the Sagittarius A* frequency (= creating a synthesis), in essence, means practical work to realize this ideal.
So, the burden - for the first time in history, to begin working out the mechanism of such adjustment was assumed by Russia. Thus began Operation Hour of the Bull.
Formally, it began in October 1917. But in practice, the real beginning was the publication in the Pravda newspaper of Stalin's article “The Year of the Great Turning Point. To the XNUMXth Anniversary of October, in which he gave the go-ahead to start work on the construction of socialism and communism.
Quite quickly, conditions developed in Soviet society that promoted the formation of a third level of morality among people. Contemporary Russian political scientist Sergei Chernyakhovsky writes about it this way:
people were required to be constantly ready for a feat, that is, committing acts that serve something more than just their own biological existence. It was a World where a person, with each new victory over circumstances, rises to a new level of his tribal existence ... A society where knowledge is more important than consumption.
But - work on the Red project, as you know, ended in failure! And so, it is necessary to show that this collapse does not indicate the utopian nature of the communist idea!
This is a huge topic.
Therefore, only the main reason for the collapse. She is. According to the logic of the formation of a “society of synthesis” (= according to the logic of Vladimir Solovyov), the construction of communism should have begun in Europe and / or the USA, because only they went “through the Enlightenment” by the end of the XNUMXth century. But neither in Europe nor in the USA there were no objective prerequisites for this!
What happened?
The answer to this question was given in the works of E. Bernstein, M. Tugan-Baranovsky, K. Kautsky and some others. The main thing here is that Marxism, which arose in the middle of the XNUMXth century, quite accurately, from the point of view of the everyday experience of the proletariat, describes only wild, black-and-white capitalism - where class contradictions are extremely pronounced and extremely aggravated. And then a clear class psychology is formed among the workers - and only in this case can they be convinced of the historical inevitability of the collapse of capitalist relations and the triumph of the communist ideal in the future.
Meanwhile, by the end of the XNUMXth century, European capitalism had ceased to be wild and black and white. There, for example, the tendency to lower the wages of workers, to the growth of chronic unemployment, poverty and destitution - all that was characteristic of mid-century capitalism, disappeared. It is no coincidence that by the end of the XNUMXth century the revolutionary dominant in the European labor movement had practically died out.
In Russia, which entered the path of capitalist development much later than the leading countries of the West, on the contrary, by that time capitalism was still absolutely wild. And so the Russian reality of the late XIX - early XX centuries. could be quite convincingly described from the point of view of the "class approach". That is why Russia had to take on the entire burden of building a "society of synthesis"...
But at the same time, the fact that Russia essentially did not receive comprehensive "capitalist experience" (like Europe) - the collapse of the Red project was almost inevitable.
Let us now return to the words from the title of the article about the approach to the “climax point”. What do they mean?
They mean one thing:
a) today the curators have practically created the prerequisites for the start of the main part of the mission of Russia - to full-fledged work on building a society of synthesis;
b) the mechanism of this transition is launched.
I can only say one thing about this: in the Russian expert community, a certain doubt about the effectiveness of power way out of the "Ukrainian impasse". The main logic is this. Such a path requires the introduction of a whole system of “parallel measures”: mobilizing the economy, bringing the country’s governance system in line with new requirements (a modern version of the State Defense Committee with special powers is needed), and radical personnel decisions at all levels of government. Only in this case - in general, the success of the power (military) option is possible. If these measures are not taken, the military option will definitely end in disaster for Russia.
But these, experts say, are not all factors. There are others: sanctions are mounting, which have already cut off our extremely import-dependent economy (especially the military-industrial complex) from advanced foreign technologies; we already now have to confront the combined military and economic potential of the 50 most powerful countries in the world ...
Simple logic requires the preparation of a backup plan "B". The main thing in it: it should be non-military system of measures.
As I tried to show, such a system of measures can only be a transition to the creation of a society of synthesis. There are no alternatives.
Information