Neutrality in support: India and China refused at a meeting of the UN Security Council to condemn Russia for joining new regions

41
Neutrality in support: India and China refused at a meeting of the UN Security Council to condemn Russia for joining new regions

UN Security Council. Archive photo


Yesterday, a regular meeting of the UN Security Council was held in New York, convened on the initiative of the United States and Albania (a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council) on the non-recognition of referendums in the DPR, LPR, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions. Russia, which is one of the five permanent members of the Security Council, vetoed the resolution. In fact, India and China (a permanent member of the UN Security Council) expressed their disagreement with the wording proposed in the final document, whose representatives abstained from signing the resolution.



In the final resolution, in particular, there was an appeal to the entire world community not to recognize the change in the status of the "Luhansk, Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporozhye regions of Ukraine", as well as their accession to Russia. In addition, Moscow was required to immediately withdraw its military forces from Ukraine.

Vasily Nebenzya, Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN, commenting on the text of the document, said that some of the colleagues on the Council violated decorum in this situation and hit the bottom. He noted that no one had ever succeeded in adopting a resolution directly condemning one of the permanent members of the Security Council. It would be strange if Russia voted ... against itself. But something else is important in the voting results. The resolution was supported by ten countries out of 15 permanent and non-permanent members of the Security Council, four abstained, including China and India. The other two countries are Brazil and Gabon.

China abstains from voting on resolution

Zhang Jun, Permanent Representative of the People's Republic of China to the UN, said.

The representative of the People's Republic of China explained his position by saying that the UN Security Council should take objective and constructive decisions aimed at the diplomatic settlement of conflicts, and not vice versa.

Indian Permanent Representative to the UN Richura Kamboj said the country would abstain from the vote:

Escalation of rhetoric and tension is in no one's interest, it is important to find a way to return to negotiations. Considering the whole evolving situation, India is abstaining from voting.

Of course, the position of New Delhi and Beijing does not mean that these countries recognize referendums and the entry of the former regions of Ukraine into the Russian Federation. They did not do this after the annexation of Crimea, and they will not do so now. At the same time, two major powers with a total population of almost three billion people, powerful growing economies have once again demonstrated that the political hegemony of the West led by Washington has come to an end.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    41 comment
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +8
      1 October 2022 12: 55
      China, too, then return their land.
      1. +1
        1 October 2022 12: 57
        Well, we will not remain in debt and remember the good when voting at the UN when Taiwan is annexed to China, and Kashmir returns to the Indian harbor.
        1. +2
          1 October 2022 14: 36
          Quote from Silver99
          Well, we will not remain in debt and remember the good when voting at the UN when Taiwan is annexed to China

          Russia will also abstain from the UN vote when China annexes Taiwan.
        2. +2
          1 October 2022 15: 00
          There are many Tibetan Buddhists in Kashmir and all Kashmiris are ethnically related to the East Turkestan/Xinjiang Uighurs. Thus, China has huge claims to most of Kashmir, which was given to India by the Anglo-Saxons against the will of the Kashmiris. During the 1962 war between India and China, Kasmir was in the spotlight. So I will wait for a day to see ignorant people like you give Kashmir to India without war with China.
          And while it is difficult to imagine what percentage of votes Russia would have received if the majority of Ukrainians had not already fled and could not take part in the referendum. But it is certain that even if only 2% of native Kashmiris remain in the referendum (as both the British and India's first prime minister repeatedly promised half a century ago), the result will still be in favor of Pakistan.
          Maybe you should learn more about geopolitics?
      2. -4
        1 October 2022 13: 17
        Quote: Incvizitor
        China, too, then return their land.

        And India too..
        GDP gathered the SCO and received support, not for free of course ..
        So let the USA and others there squeal and fall into epilepsy ..
        In general, the UN is already a chicken coop of the USA ..
        It's time for another association to create a counterbalance to the United States
        Russia-China-India, etc. This is a powerful force in terms of territories and population Well, and economies!
        That's just the world's media so far in their hands .. That's the main problem !!! This issue needs to be resolved. Russia created RT a long time ago, but it is being blocked now and they are afraid of the Truth! Oh well
    2. +2
      1 October 2022 12: 56
      as they say ... if not against ... then FOR ... for me at least they didn’t join unfriendly countries ... this is a tacit approval
      1. +7
        1 October 2022 13: 03
        but for me, silent friends are better than talkative imaginary allies in the CSTO. Loneliness is the prerogative of the strong, the weak always lean against the crowd and attack in a flock.
        1. -1
          1 October 2022 15: 29
          They are not our friends. However, they are not enemies. And you don't need more. One way or another, this shatters all attempts by the West to turn Russia into a besieged fortress and cut off all channels of its communication with the world.
    3. +8
      1 October 2022 12: 56
      They didn’t - because both countries have a lot of their own problems with different regions, and they absolutely do not need to create a precedent for themselves by officially agreeing with the actions of the Russian Federation ..
    4. +12
      1 October 2022 12: 58
      Yes, spit on this anti-Russian hysteria! When Kosovo was torn off from Serbia, where was the notorious "world community"? Silent as a rag! And now let them be silent! !!
      1. 0
        1 October 2022 14: 39
        Quote: Thrifty
        When Kosovo was torn off from Serbia, where was the notorious "world community"? Silent in a rag! And now let them be silent! !!

        So after all, Kosovo is the same "project" of the Anglo-Saxons as the "project Ukraine". Who will, against himself beloved, oppose.
    5. -1
      1 October 2022 12: 58
      China wants to return the rebellious counter-revolutionary Taiwan, and India wants to return Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, which until 1949 were a single British India, and the British monarch had the title of Emperor or Empress of India.
      1. +3
        1 October 2022 13: 42
        No, India does not lay claim to Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, which, by the way, was a separate British colony. India has territorial issues with Pakistan. India has a huge Muslim minority. Do you think she still dreams of getting an additional 410 million Muslims from Pakistan and Bangladesh in addition to her 180 million? Now there are about 14 percent of Muslims, in case of unification they will become more than a third of the population. By the way, at one time Burma was part of British India.
      2. +1
        1 October 2022 13: 59
        don’t exaggerate ... Pakistan is already NO ... but the border states and borders are a really controversial issue specially laid down by the Angles
    6. +3
      1 October 2022 12: 59
      India and China have their own skeletons in the closet.
      They do not want to be led by the United States, and quarrel with them and Russia.
      Therefore, they acted very cunningly, took a neutral position.
      But China muttered something disapproving towards the United States.
      1. -1
        1 October 2022 13: 07
        China, as usual, sits on the shore waiting.
        1. 0
          1 October 2022 14: 12
          Quote: Andrey Moskvin
          China, as usual, sits on the shore waiting.

          With such a position, after all, you can’t wait until the corpse of the enemy floats past if the enemy sneaks up from behind.
      2. +5
        1 October 2022 13: 11
        Quote from Fizik13
        India and China have their skeletons in the closet.

        It's not about "skeletons", but about living people living in the former Soviet republics, in Chinese Taiwan and Indian Kashmir. Now the United States is arranging Russophobic hysteria wherever possible. For example, universities in Kazakhstan are already occupied by American funds and sponsors. The situation is similar in other so far formally "friendly" Russia CIS countries. In fact, they have now taken a neutral position, but this is not for long. Soon European and American candy wrappers will overshadow the minds of politicians there too.
    7. 0
      1 October 2022 13: 13
      In this case, to refrain is practically to support the Russian side as opposed to the West. And they didn’t vote AGAINST for obvious reasons - China has its own problems with Taiwan and the Uyghurs, India still doesn’t want to go on the rampage and also has disputed territories. The Americans are disappointed - a united anti-Russian front did not work out.
    8. +1
      1 October 2022 13: 14
      Western hegemony led by Washington came to an end
      It’s too early to talk about the end, but the fact that China has enlisted the support of the Russian Federation with at least a neutral position on the Taiwan issue is obvious. As for the rest, Russia’s veto is already making the votes of the other permanent members meaningless))) Respect to abstentions, a trifle but nice
    9. -2
      1 October 2022 13: 19
      This is not "joining regions" - this is the beginning of the end (if not the end) of the old world order. Therefore, India and China are for change ("I am your pipe shatal").
    10. 0
      1 October 2022 13: 25
      They simply do not want to be in the place of Europe, and worse than that, Afghanistan. We know how all the "allies" of the United States end up
    11. 0
      1 October 2022 13: 25
      The resolution was supported by ten countries out of 15 permanent and non-permanent members of the Security Council, four abstained, including China and India.


      Let the US rage, soon everything will start to change ...
    12. +1
      1 October 2022 13: 25
      And what should be other results with such a composition?
    13. +1
      1 October 2022 13: 26
      Neither India nor (especially) China will ever vote against when they are sure that someone will veto without them. They don't pop out unnecessarily. But their silence/abstinence means a lot. hi
    14. +1
      1 October 2022 13: 30
      Well, since Russian netizens are talking about Taiwan.

      Let's clear up a few facts

      1, Ukraine is actually more adamant than Russia on the issue of Taiwan, because all along, all Ukrainian Taiwan issues were entrusted to the Ukrainian embassy located in Moscow to act on its behalf. (Currently, it has been handed over to the Ukrainian embassy located in Poland to act on their behalf).

      2, Ukraine in the last month, their parliament tried to establish contact with Taiwan, as Lithuania did, and China gave a clear signal to cancel contacts with Ukrainians. Ukraine compromised, and their ambassador said he supported the "one China" policy. This is better than the Lithuanians did, if the Ukrainians were Lithuanians, we would immediately unconditionally transport ammunition so that you turn Vilnius into a steppe.

      3, belonging to Kashmir, which, according to the Chinese, belongs to Pakistan, not India. Obviously, here we, the Chinese, have a biased attitude towards Russian netizens.


      Politics is complicated and therefore we cannot form a military alliance with you.
      1. -2
        1 October 2022 14: 00
        Thanks for your resume.

        In the West, they write that Xi will try to resolve the situation in Taiwan by military means by 2030. Do you think this is realistic? My impression is that the Taiwanese do not want to sacrifice themselves for the US, even if they do not want to join the mainland today.
        1. 0
          1 October 2022 15: 05
          Xi is playing for time, Russia is fighting for them.
          1. +1
            1 October 2022 15: 58
            You always think of yourself as a victim, a giver. Others are ungrateful.


            In fact, China is already in a trade war with the US that is already raging at Trump's behest, and without the use of Taiwan, war will break out any day before Russia and Ukraine. What then did Russia do for China, may I ask?
        2. 0
          1 October 2022 15: 18
          We cannot wait for a war against Taiwan.

          And when this happens, we understand that it will have serious consequences for our lives, but we will tolerate it, causing as much damage to the United States and Japan as possible.

          In absolute isolation and without friends, we prepared for war and mutual destruction against Taiwan, Japan and the United States at the same time.


          The Chinese really love their children, and since war is inevitable, let's get through it and not let it happen to our children.
    15. -1
      1 October 2022 13: 56
      Yesterday, a regular meeting of the UN Security Council was held in New York, convened on the initiative of the United States and Albania (a non-permanent member of the UN Security Council) on the non-recognition of referendums


      In general, this is called interference in the internal affairs of the country. And here is a very good example of what might follow:

      The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nicaragua announced the immediate severance of diplomatic relations with the Netherlands in connection with the intervention of the kingdom in the internal affairs of the country.
    16. -1
      1 October 2022 13: 59
      In a year we are waiting for new regions, Odessa, Nikolaev, Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk.
    17. 0
      1 October 2022 14: 23
      Neutrality in support: India and China refused at a meeting of the UN Security Council to condemn Russia for joining new regions

      This refusal to vote can be considered an approval, but no more. It is too early to talk about support, because to support means to provide real help. Another one is disturbing. Here is a diagram of the composition of the UN Security Council by continent:

      Can anyone tell me why two out of three countries in Africa voted against recognition? And this is after the GDP collected them, forgave the debts, after Russia sends food there ...
      Only one thing is clear: in the near future, the remnants of Ukraine must be deprived of Nazi statehood and demilitarized.
      After that, it will become easier to speak ...
    18. -2
      1 October 2022 14: 58
      China and India were surprised that they did not support Russia in the UNESCO Security Council, neutrality is neither for you nor for the enemy. Where will they look tomorrow? It is necessary to explain to them intelligibly that they are the next victims of the Western Hawks. That only together can the Western Coalition be defeated in terms of the Market and the vitality of their currencies in relation to the $ and Euro, as well as in the military component. China may collide with the United States over Taiwan. Russia openly supported China in this matter, but what are they ??? According to ancient history, crafty China, but in the New Age their strategy is not good, it can turn against them.
    19. -2
      1 October 2022 15: 02
      China and India should not abstain, but support Russia.
      1. 0
        1 October 2022 15: 42
        Abstinence is a pressure sharing technique because everyone knows that one vote decides everything.

        With the constant expansion of the UN Security Council, quite a lot of things will happen, and one country will definitely come forward and veto everything. But behind this is the will of everyone, although both Russia and the US say they support the idea of ​​India becoming a permanent member of the UN Security Council.
    20. 0
      1 October 2022 15: 58
      Proč Čína stále fízluje - sleduje 1.3 miliardy lidí kamerami, to je digitální crime.
    21. -2
      1 October 2022 17: 45
      Of course, the position of New Delhi and Beijing does not mean that these countries recognize referendums and the entry of the former regions of Ukraine into the Russian Federation. They did not do this after the annexation of Crimea, and they will not do so now.
      Quite right, and this is more of a political minus than a plus for us.
      At the same time, two major powers with a total population of almost three billion people, powerful growing economies have once again demonstrated that the political hegemony of the West led by Washington has come to an end.
      It would certainly be good, but this is too hasty a conclusion ...
    22. -3
      1 October 2022 18: 21
      Still alright. I'm only afraid that a couple more "retreats to more favorable lines" - they will no longer see us as a force capable of crushing even such Nazi Ukraine, which is lagging behind us in everything (well, except for l / s). And even China and India will simply stop supporting us ...
    23. -1
      2 October 2022 00: 36
      There is a price to be paid for indifference and inaction. The annexation of regions is one of the forms of reckoning. It was necessary to prevent a conflict between two such powerful armies. There must be a limit somewhere.
    24. 0
      2 October 2022 12: 50
      something has been heard for almost 100 years how the end came to the West and it will not end) populism

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"