Military Review

Ukrainian Ambassador to the United States refuted Washington's ban on the use of Western weapons for strikes on Russian territory

21
Ukrainian Ambassador to the United States refuted Washington's ban on the use of Western weapons for strikes on Russian territory

The United States did not prohibit Ukraine from using what was set by Western countries weapon on the territory of Russia, the only restriction is the MLRS HIMARS. This was stated by the Ambassador of Ukraine in Washington Oksana Markarova.


The representative of Kyiv in the United States, answering questions from Ukrainian journalists, said that the Americans did not in any way limit the Ukrainian military in strikes on Russian territory, allowing the use of all types of weapons supplied by the West, except for the MLRS HIMARS. At the same time, Washington considers Crimea to be a "primordially Ukrainian" territory, so no prohibitions apply to strikes on the peninsula, including multiple launch rocket systems.

Earlier, the Minister of Defense of Ukraine Oleksiy Reznikov made the same statement. According to him, Kyiv undertook not to strike at the territory of Russia, but this ban does not apply to the "temporarily occupied" territories.

We have an agreement that we will not use weapons transferred to us by the United States and partners on the territory of the Russian Federation. But if today we are talking about the de-occupation of the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, where the enemy is located, then, accordingly, we have no such restrictions.

- he said.

Thus, it can be stated that the new regions of Russia will be perceived by Ukraine as "temporarily occupied" territories and strikes against them will not stop. Moreover, all types of weapons available to the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be used. The Zelensky regime does not recognize the entry of new territories into Russia, Kyiv is already demanding the supply of new batches of weapons from its Western sponsors, hatching plans for a complete "de-occupation" and reaching the 1991 borders.
21 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. dmi.pris
    dmi.pris 30 September 2022 07: 21
    +12
    So only one thing remains. To demolish this territorial misunderstanding, together with Ukrainians
    1. Fedor Sokolov
      Fedor Sokolov 30 September 2022 07: 45
      +5
      It is necessary to drive the aggressive Ukrainians into the western regions and create something like a cordon sanitaire in the form of the Zhytomyr and Vinnitsa regions.
      1. Hto tama
        Hto tama 30 September 2022 07: 54
        +13
        Quote: Fedor Sokolov
        It is necessary to drive the aggressive Ukrainians into the western regions and create something like a cordon sanitaire in the form of the Zhytomyr and Vinnitsa regions.

        It is necessary to demolish this non-state completely, otherwise everything will continue further, they will not calm down until they rest angry
      2. Zamira
        Zamira 30 September 2022 13: 27
        +2
        Quote: Fedor Sokolov
        It is necessary to drive the aggressive Ukrainians into the western regions and create something like a cordon sanitaire in the form of the Zhytomyr and Vinnitsa regions.

        No no. This is a half-measure, and a very dangerous half-measure. It must be completely demolished. Otherwise, we will get a war for decades.
    2. Zamira
      Zamira 30 September 2022 13: 24
      0
      Quote: dmi.pris
      So only one thing remains. To demolish this territorial misunderstanding, together with Ukrainians

      Exactly!!! And nothing else!
  2. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 30 September 2022 07: 23
    +1
    The United States distanced itself from the problem by simply not recognizing the referendum. And they continue to live in their own world that is convenient for them. Yes, we will finally kick this shobla out of Kyiv in order to return them to reality. The PRC is secretly not against Belgrade.
  3. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 30 September 2022 07: 37
    +1
    good answer ... to legitimize the target in foreign territories associated with the supply of weapons and the preparation of various kinds of armed forces
  4. Fedor Sokolov
    Fedor Sokolov 30 September 2022 07: 41
    0
    Which is to be expected and the worst thing is that we can't do anything about it. Having liberated the entire Donbass, Kherson region and Zaporozhye, Russia has no guarantees that the aggressive military actions of the Kyiv regime with the support of NATO will stop in these long-suffering lands.
    1. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 30 September 2022 08: 19
      0
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      Which is to be expected, and the worst thing is that we can't do anything about it.

      Let's see. As previously stated by the big guys, if there are strikes, then the military operation will change the format from NWO to CTO, which provides for other ways of conducting b / actions in terms of determining priority targets for retaliatory strikes. So we will see what will change after the decree on the acceptance of these territories into Russia. We'll probably get it today.
      Quote: Fyodor Sokolov
      Russia has no guarantees that the aggressive military actions of the Kyiv regime, supported by NATO, will stop in these long-suffering lands.
      There are no guarantees, but there are possibilities supported by arguments, the main thing is not to be shy to apply them.
  5. Belousov_Kuzma_Egorovich
    Belousov_Kuzma_Egorovich 30 September 2022 07: 41
    -2
    The reason for the start of the use of tactical nuclear weapons on Ukrainian infrastructure: power plants, bridges, railway junctions. Without electricity and without railway communication, the Europeans will not be able to supply weapons to Ukraine. Or is Ukrainian infrastructure more valuable to Putin than the lives of thousands of Russian soldiers? Oh yes, he constantly talks about "the fraternal Ukrainian people, who should not suffer for the actions of the Ukrainian authorities."
    1. VORON538
      VORON538 30 September 2022 07: 59
      +2
      To destroy the infrastructure, the use of tactical nuclear weapons is not necessary, it is also possible to disable objects with conventional weapons. But there is one prerequisite: the Kremlin’s desire is needed. But this is not always the case. .Despite the fact that civilians remain there, whom the "defenders" threaten to "liberate" right now.
      1. Amper
        Amper 30 September 2022 10: 06
        -1
        Myamlya and underage in the army - a reason for ridicule. lol The old guard from the USSR, who else is in himself, to all command posts. Mämle flowers after the victory love and retire soldier
  6. sergo1914
    sergo1914 30 September 2022 07: 42
    +5
    Is that allowed? One sovereign state indicates to another sovereign state what types of weapons it can use against a third sovereign state.
    1. Belousov_Kuzma_Egorovich
      Belousov_Kuzma_Egorovich 30 September 2022 07: 48
      0
      Quote: sergo1914
      Is that allowed? One sovereign state indicates to another sovereign state what types of weapons it can use against a third sovereign state.

      Anglo-Saxons can do anything. Rule 1: The US and Britain are always right. Rule 2: If the US or Britain is wrong, see Rule 1.
  7. Uprun
    Uprun 30 September 2022 08: 04
    +1
    This cartoon will be a couple of months old .... Has something changed?
  8. Egoza
    Egoza 30 September 2022 08: 16
    +6
    And strikes on the territory of Russia, which is not "temporarily occupied" is possible? Or does it not count? It is necessary to finish off this Outskirts with all your might and not by humanitarian methods. Yes, we are at war with NATO forces, so this training ground needs to be smashed to pieces. You can't give up.
  9. art having
    art having 30 September 2022 08: 30
    +1
    How the lapdog yapped ... Well, nothing, nothing, I'll see how you sing in a couple of months ..
  10. Petr_Koldunov
    Petr_Koldunov 30 September 2022 09: 14
    +3
    Ukraine once again publicly signed at the official level - that she is a serf girl in the United States. We were allowed to do this... we were not allowed to do this...
    A representative of a truly sovereign state would never answer like that. Any official representing at least a minimally independent country would say that "we do not need anyone's permission for those actions that we consider necessary to protect the interests of our country and protect our territories in wartime"
  11. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 30 September 2022 11: 06
    +2
    Officially, the Americans can say (recommend) what they want and even "peacefully", but in reality the Ukrainian side knows very well that they have been given "carte blanche". It is probably not worth explaining who directs the American MLRS, who gives the coordinates to the calculations of American and other howitzers. They will quietly give a tactical nuclear charge, so the Ukrainians will gladly fire it at the indicated point, including their controlled territory. It is not for nothing that for the second week they are pulling a song about the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia.
  12. _simply
    _simply 30 September 2022 13: 40
    0
    Nearby it is dangerous to have such ugliness as Ukraine. An existential threat to Kherson, Zaparozhye and LDNR... But the activities of the United States (NATO) are already casus belli.
  13. Former soldier
    Former soldier 30 September 2022 22: 42
    0
    Quote: sergo1914
    Is that allowed? One sovereign state indicates to another sovereign state what types of weapons it can use against a third sovereign state.

    Well of course you can. If you are an economically or at least militarily strong state ..