James Paris Lee - a man ahead of his time

38
James Paris Lee - a man ahead of his time
Here it is - the most important invention in the field weapons - Paris Lee shop. We do not know the name of the inventors of the gun barrel, the trigger and the hammer, but we do know that without his magazine, neither many rapid-fire rifles, nor automatic pistols, nor the famous Kalashnikov assault rifle would have appeared. In all these and many other samples of store weapons today, this store is present. The photo shows a magazine for a Remington-Lee rifle, model 1885. Photo forgottenweapons.com


“But many who are first will be last, and the last will be first.”
Matthew's Gospel, 19: 30

Weapon stories. It has always been and always will be that from a small seed a huge tree grows. So it is in people's lives: from another, at first glance, quite insignificant invention, many others grow over time, and it itself turns out to be the basis of an entire industry. AT stories There are also such examples of creating weapons, and the most significant of them is the example of a man named James Paris Lee, who at one time came up with a very simple, but absolutely wonderful thing!




This is what James Paris Lee looked like in 1889

He was born in Scotland, and in 1836 he came to Canada with his family at the age of 5. Apparently, he was destined to be a weapon designer, because he made his first gun at the age of 12. Trained as a watchmaker, he married in 1858 and moved to live in the United States. As soon as the Civil War began, he offered the army of the northerners a cartridge rifle chambered for his own design. For a number of reasons, its production did not work out, and Lee went to work at the Remington enterprise, where he continued to invent.


Lee's box store. Schematic from 1879 US Patent

In 1875, he patented the main invention of his life - a detachable box magazine for a rifle. And already in 1878 he developed a truly revolutionary rifle with this magazine and received a patent for it.

Lee offered this rifle chambered for black powder cartridges (and others didn’t exist then!) to the army and the fleet for testing. The army rejected it, but the Navy Council, which tested the rifle, made the following conclusion:

“The relative simplicity of the mechanism and the ease with which the magazine can be used make it a valuable and destructive weapon. Tests carried out with the rifle in the presence of the Council were the most satisfactory."


Carabiner D. W. Keane "Remington Keane" with a nine-shot tubular magazine. Limited production for the US Navy and Indian police armament on a number of reservations in the western United States. Photo littlegun.be


Native American brule "Crow Dog" with a carbine "Remington Keane" model "frontier" 1880 Nebraska, ca. 1898 Fort Niobrera

Despite his long association with Remington, Lee clearly wanted to have his own arms business. So he founded the Lee Arms Company in Bridgeport, Connecticut, in 1879. It has been suggested that Lee's departure from Remington was due, at least in part, to the company's decision to begin production of the bolt-action Keane rifle with an underbarrel magazine.


The longitudinally sliding bolt of the Keane rifle required manual cocking. Photo littlegun.be


The location of the loading window was also inconvenient. It was located at the bottom of the receiver. For hunting weapons, this arrangement is acceptable, but for military weapons it is not suitable. Photo littlegun.be

Lee probably felt that Remington would not be able to allocate the necessary resources to manufacture and sell two different types of bolt-action rifles, and so he set up his own business. Lee attracted investors to the new company, including the creator of the legendary German Luger pistol, but since the company did not have a material base, Lee's rifles were to be produced and sold by Sharps, but under the name Lee Arms Company. The ammunition for them was the cartridge .45-70 Government ("Governmental").


TTX cartridge .45-70 Government ("Governmental") .45 - nominal bullet diameter 0,458 inches (11,63 mm); 70 - the weight of the charge of black powder in grains (4,54 grams); 405 is the weight of a lead bullet in grains (26,2 grams). Initial speed 487 m/s. The allowable dispersion radius was 101,6 mm (4 in) at 91,44 meters (100 yd). At a distance of 457 m, such a jacketless bullet fired from a Springfield rifle pierced a 173 mm thick block of white pine wood.

The first working prototype of the new bolt-action Lee rifle was manufactured by Sharps in October 1879 and presented to the US Naval Ordnance Board for testing, which was to be carried out on April 17, 1880.


Five-shot magazine rifle "Remington-Lee" М1879. Photo forgottenweapons.com

Once again, the Lee rifle impressed the sailors quite strongly, so a contract was signed for the manufacture of 300 bolt-action rifles in .45-70 caliber with the expectation of receiving additional orders in the future. The original price for one rifle for the US Navy was $16,25. They named it "Lee's Naval Rifle Model 1879". The rifle weighed about 3,2 kg and had a total length of about 120 cm with a barrel length of 73,6 cm, fixed to the stock with two rings.


Magazine for the Remington-Lee M1879 rifle. Pay attention to the very short jaws to hold the cartridge and the tide on the left under the plate to hold the cartridges in the magazine. At the moment of attaching the store, the edge of the shaft pressed the protruding button, moved it down and thus the store opened. Photo Amoskeag Auction Company

With its device, the rifle looked more like samples of rifles that were supposed to appear about ten years later. So, she had a rotary bolt with two lugs, one of which was at the base of the bolt handle, and the other on the opposite side, locked in a recess in the receiver. On the left side of the shutter, a hole was prudently drilled for the gas to escape. The rifle did not have a fuse as such, but its drummer could be put on a half-cock, and then he worked as a fuse. The receivers produced by the Sharps rifles were marked: THE LEE ARMS CO. BRIDGEPORT. CONN./USA/.


The shaft of the Remington-Lee M1879 rifle store. On the left side, a groove under the ledge on the store is visible. Photo forgottenweapons.com

The most revolutionary part of this rifle and at the same time the simplest was the box-shaped middle magazine. It was a flat box with a leaf spring, a cartridge feeder plate, and two curved jaws that held the cartridges in the magazine. At the same time, the store was detachable. That is, the shooter could have several pre-loaded magazines and quickly change them as needed.


Plate for firing single shots with the magazine removed. Photo forgottenweapons.com

True, there was one “but”, which led to some complication of the design. For some reason, Lee made the jaws for holding the cartridges in the magazine very short, so that they actually did not hold the cartridges in it! Therefore, a spring-loaded retractable plate was installed on the left side of the store, which prevented them from falling out of a fully equipped store.

The edge of the magazine shaft shifted the plate when the magazine joined the rifle, and now nothing interfered with the supply of cartridges to the chamber. Another tribute to the time was another plate, which occupied a horizontal position in the receiver when the magazine was removed from it. This was done so that the shooter could fire from this rifle without attaching a magazine to it, that is, as from a “single charge”, thereby saving cartridges! Accordingly, the store inserted into the mine pushed it aside.


Schematic diagram of the Remington-Lee M1885 rifle.

Meanwhile, it turned out that the Remington company suffered a crushing defeat with its Keane rifle. It was necessary to do something urgently, and then, fortunately for her, the Sharps company went bankrupt and could not fulfill Lee's order. And in the end, it was Remington who had to take on the fulfillment of this order of the Navy, because, as you know, a bird in the hand is better than a crane in the sky. And so, due to a more than strange interweaving of cause and effect, the Remington-Lee repeating rifle appeared, which became the most modern rifle in the world until the advent of the 8-mm cartridge with smokeless powder and the Lebel M1886 rifle, in which, moreover, the archaic tubular magazine was still used.

The Model 1879 Remington rifle had limited use in the US Navy, while the Model 1882 was tested by the US Army and produced in very limited numbers. In the end, in 1892, for some reason, the army abandoned it in favor of the Krag-Jorgensen rifle.


Rifle "Remington-Lee" M1879 Navy (US Navy). Photo Rock Island Auction

About 1881 Model 1884 Lee rifles were produced by Remington & Son between 7500 and 1879. In 1884, China purchased 13 Remington-Lee rifles chambered in .000 Spanish (43×11,15mm R). Of these, 58 M4000s were converted to .1882, so Lee had every reason to once jokingly say that maybe they thought he was Chinese, which is why they bought so many of them. During the Sino-French War, they proved to be very effective against the French army, which used the single-shot Gras rifle.


The 1885 rifle had an improved magazine with longer jaws and moved the bolt handle to the rear. Photo forgottenweapons.com

New Zealand purchased 500 Remington-Lee rifles for its militia in 1887, also chambered in .43 Spanish. They were quickly replaced after complaints about the quality of the ammunition.


Rifle "Remington-Lee" M1885 with a bayonet. Photo Rock Island Auction

But Lee's invention was most appreciated in the UK, where his name was included as the basis (bolt and magazine) of such rifle designs as the "Lee-Metford" and "Lee-Enfield". To summarize, we can say that James P. Lee was a brilliant designer and throughout his career remained at the forefront of 250th century weapons development, and was even ahead of his time in many ways. He received little recognition during his lifetime, but received $000 from the UK for his patent rights and retired as a wealthy and successful man. Well, the Lee-Metford and Lee-Enfield rifles from 1888 until the Korean War were in the hands of the British Tommy. The third design of Paris Lee was absolutely fantastic at the time of its creation, the 1895 Winchester-Lee rifle for the US Navy chambered in 6mm Lee cartridge. But we'll talk about it next time...
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    3 October 2022 06: 05
    Yeah! A revolutionary invention for small arms! And before the invention of the middle store, the designers as soon as they did not pervert, puzzling over where to place the cartridges. They were placed in drums like in revolvers, and in underbarrel tubular magazines, and in butts. The middle store was very simple, reliable, did not make the weapon much heavier, and most importantly, it could be quickly loaded with several rounds at once using a clip with one movement of the thumb, that is, for example, it took almost the same time to load a clip for 5 rounds, as when loading with one cartridge without a clip.
  2. +10
    3 October 2022 06: 23
    By the way, it is strange that the French in 1886 adopted the Lebel rifle with an outdated underbarrel magazine, by that time the French should have been aware of Lee's rifles and his magazine. Apparently, national pride played among the Gauls, and they decided to have their own, albeit worse, than some foreign one. For example, when the Minister of War of France, Eugene Etienne, was offered, based on the experience of the Anglo-Boer War, to switch, like the British, to a camouflage color of uniforms, he said: "Red pants - this is France!"
    1. +3
      3 October 2022 06: 30
      This phrase is not a military one, but one of the French politicians.
      The military was in favor of switching to a camouflage uniform color.
      But the politicians did not give money ...
      I had to limit myself to experiments in finding a suitable camouflage color.
      1. +8
        3 October 2022 06: 35
        No, it was the Minister of War of France, Eugene Etienne, who said this. It was only later that his phrase was attributed to the French generals. As they attributed "Women are still giving birth" to Zhukov, although the French prince de Conde was the first to say this in 1674. Or how they like to attribute about "300% profit" to Karl Marx, and not to Thomas Dunning.
        1. +3
          3 October 2022 15: 49
          Quote: hohol95
          This phrase is not a military one, but one of the French politicians.

          Quote: Belousov_Kuzma_Egorovich
          No, it was the Minister of War of France, Eugene Etienne, who said this.

          Eugene Etienne is precisely that a politician and never served in the army.
          As for the position, the FDR, for example, was at one time an assistant to the Minister of the Navy, but this did not make him a sailor.
          1. The comment was deleted.
  3. +1
    3 October 2022 07: 07
    The Russians did not look closely at Lee's products ...
    1. 0
      3 October 2022 07: 08
      We looked closely. The Mosin rifle has a middle magazine of the Lee system.
      1. +4
        3 October 2022 13: 23
        The rifle, allegedly, Mosin, has a Nagant system magazine, i.e. fixed.
        1. 0
          25 March 2023 09: 25
          At the Mosin rifle, ALLEGEDLY Nagant, WHICH MADE by Mosin, long before Nagant, a single-shot, de facto Mauser store, which Nagant appropriated.
      2. +4
        3 October 2022 13: 49
        . The Mosin rifle has a middle magazine of the Lee system.


        Yes? And was it removable? belay
        1. +3
          3 October 2022 14: 14
          Yes? And was it removable?

          Yeah and 10 rounds wassat
          It is impossible to achieve a Lee-Enfield rate of fire of 40 rounds per minute from a mosquito without a replaceable magazine. Such a rate of fire was even mentioned in Lenin's writings on WWI. Of course, 40 shots are record values. Shooting using the middle finger.


          Here with clips from a prone position. Stores were used from the knee.
          1. +3
            3 October 2022 14: 20
            Ahhh ... Is this the Mosinka chambered for 12,7 × 108 mm? Then it's understandable! laughing
            There is no limit to creative imagination and there are no boundaries. wassat
          2. +4
            3 October 2022 19: 31
            The first 10 rounds are fired, and then only 5 from the clip are loaded!
            Loading 10 rounds at once from two clips very often led to distortions of the cartridges and the inability to continue firing!
            This was written in an article about "Lee-Enfield" on warspot.ru.
  4. +6
    3 October 2022 07: 10
    Lee offered this rifle chambered for black powder cartridges (and there were no others then!) in .45-70 caliber to the army and navy for testing. The army turned her down.
    This is what happens when you don’t give out bribes, but hope for perfect design and ease of use) I already wrote about this, and I repeat - there are no and cannot be really good weapons in the armies!
    Where do the designers of good weapons get money for bribes? They spend all their money stupidly on this very weapon. Fools, right? As everywhere and everywhere around the state, all competitions are won by thieves. Only they have large masses of free money.
    1. +5
      3 October 2022 13: 23
      Thanks, enlightened!

      Hiram Maxim is a thief, John Browning is a thief, Eugene Stoner is a thief, I'm already silent about Mikhal Timofeevich and a whole galaxy of designers around the world, whose weapons were adopted by different countries. laughing
      1. +1
        3 October 2022 15: 28
        Have you read the biographies of these wonderful people?! So you read) Maxim, this one was generally the flower of life, and the rest of the bastards, oh what kind of guys, there is nowhere to put samples ...
        1. +4
          3 October 2022 15: 34
          You know, I read it, it was interesting to find out how natural talent makes its way. The paths were different, but everyone was talented, and therefore they are remembered.
          1. -1
            4 October 2022 06: 50
            Yes, there are talented bastards. And they are remembered, yeah) Their organized crime groups usually remain in the shadows, but in vain, in my opinion)
        2. +4
          3 October 2022 20: 32
          They, unlike Mother Teresa, did not portray themselves as "saints"!
        3. +1
          3 October 2022 23: 18
          Baranov, Fedorov, Mosin, Tokarev, Degtyarev, Simonov, Makarov, Stechkin, Gryazev, Shipunov, Goryunov, Korovin and other domestic gunsmith designers are you considered to be "Thieves" ???
          1. -2
            4 October 2022 06: 53
            Do you need to be considered a student? Junior classes? Fedorov never launched his machine gun into real mass production in Tsarist Russia. The rest are from the USSR. Can you imagine, in the USSR the system was different! Nothing, as soon as you go through the primer to the end, they will gradually explain to you) Or no, now it’s not a school but training, there’s neither time nor desire to explain ...
            1. +2
              4 October 2022 13: 40
              Congratulations on a well-deserved award! soldier



              laughing laughing laughing
  5. +3
    3 October 2022 07: 39
    In WWI, Remington snatched contracts with Russia and Britain.
    But the contract with RI did not benefit them.
    1. +2
      3 October 2022 13: 56
      Hi Aleksey! hi

      But the contract with RI did not benefit them.


      And what's the reason?
      1. +2
        3 October 2022 14: 17
        They did it for a long time, the receivers complained about the quality.
        Then Velikaya Oktyabrskaya and Remington suddenly found themselves on the verge of bankruptcy ...
  6. +4
    3 October 2022 14: 01
    Good day to everyone, and thanks to Vyacheslav. good

    Well, the Lee-Metford and Lee-Enfield rifles from 1888 until the Korean War were in the hands of the British Tommy.


    Lee Metford


    Lee Enfield
  7. +1
    3 October 2022 18: 20
    Vyacheslav hi as always, thank you from me for the information, I read you all the time (even when banned, I read from a working laptop)! hi
    1. +6
      3 October 2022 18: 52
      Glad you're on your way. I inform. I have a new book out. 600 b/w illustrations, 448 pages.
      Take a look, you'll see...
      1. -3
        3 October 2022 22: 13
        I inform. I have a new book out. 600 b/w illustrations, 448 pages.

        Listen to what I put on a lamp last night with the fluctuating light of an electric lamp: "I remember a wonderful moment, you appeared before me as a fleeting vision, as a genius of pure beauty." Really good? Talented? And only at dawn, when the last lines were written, I remembered that A. Pushkin had already written this verse. Such a blow from the classic! BUT?

        1. +2
          4 October 2022 07: 14
          So after all, many of us don’t know English, they don’t know how to read, and it’s a pity for the money for British publications. Moreover, I know an even more interesting book in Japanese ... So in any case, recommending an English edition to our readers is simply stupid. But Russian - why not? By the way, it was this encyclopedia that was translated into Russian. You can buy both and compare. And I understand that it's enviable that with such talents, it's just hard to see someone else's book in 448 pages. "I'll always do better on my own." But... something keeps getting in the way.
          1. -1
            4 October 2022 09: 04
            And I understand that it's envious

            In the analytical psychology of Carl Jung there is such a concept - projection (projectio) - attributing to another person one's own qualities, feelings and desires. This happens unconsciously, that is, a person, when projecting (for example, being envious, knowingly believes his opponent to be equally envious) is absolutely sure that the other person really has these qualities.
            1. +1
              4 October 2022 12: 10
              Poor! Do you also know Jung so well? And still not in a psychiatric hospital?
              1. -1
                4 October 2022 13: 29
                Argumentum ad hominem personam? We immediately descended to the lower level of the Graham pyramid, having passed the five previous ones. For a fourth-generation city dweller with an education, you look pale.
                1. +1
                  4 October 2022 13: 57
                  Quote from Nephilim
                  pyramids graham

                  This one hasn't read the novel either! I know Cheops, but Graham is not. And... don't care! However, I still patiently wait for links to your articles and books. By the way, I don't know Latin either, don't bother...
                  1. -1
                    4 October 2022 13: 59
                    I answered you about the link under the previous comment on another thread. Pointed out an almost straight path.
                    1. +1
                      4 October 2022 14: 08
                      Forgive me generously, but due to natural stupidity and ignorance, I did not understand you. Not on that branch, not on this one. It is easier to write, as for the most mediocre mind.
  8. 0
    8 October 2022 12: 54
    Quote: Belousov_Kuzma_Egorovich
    "Red pants - this is France!".

    I read somewhere that a white flag is included in the equipment of a French officer.
  9. 0
    11 November 2022 19: 20
    The article is interesting and beautiful, but skillfully described. Perhaps no discussion is appropriate here, just thanks for taking the time to read it .. am