The American press writes about the "reality" of the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine

59
The American press writes about the "reality" of the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine

Russia, in the event of serious threats to its security, can indeed use nuclear weapon in Ukraine, so the words of President Vladimir Putin should not be taken as a bluff. The Associated Press writes about this in an article entitled “How real are Putin’s nuclear threats to Ukraine?” For its part, Western, so to speak, colleagues, it would be useful to remind that the President of Russia has never threatened Ukraine with the use of nuclear weapons. If the United States had listened more carefully to what Putin said, they would have paid attention to the words about nuclear threats from the NATO countries (the United States and Britain). Then the President of Russia noted that the West should not engage in nuclear blackmail, since "the wind rose may turn out to be directed in their direction."

But the American author has his own logic.



The article argues that the partial mobilization launched by the Russian leadership will not provide a quick solution to the Ukrainian problem. Therefore, Russian President Vladimir Putin allegedly becomes "more and more unstable" and this makes him think more and more about the possibility of using nuclear weapons.

According to the author of the publication, Putin is most worried about maintaining his power. Allegedly, a defeat in Ukraine could threaten his 22-year rule, so he is ready for any measures to prevent the fiasco of a special military operation.

The publication draws attention to the fact that earlier Putin spoke very lightly about the use of nuclear weapons. So, he once, recognizing the catastrophic nature of the nuclear war scenario, nevertheless said: “But why do we need a world without Russia?” The fact that this statement, like any other arguments of Russian leaders about the prospects for a nuclear war, is of a precautionary nature and is aimed at sobering up the "hot heads" of American and European "hawks", the publication, of course, does not write.

The fact that Putin is not bluffing has recently been recognized by many Western politicians. For example, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel urged Putin's words to be taken seriously. Former US Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul also believes that Putin is not lying, but is "restraining" the West with his warnings. According to McFaul, the purpose of such statements is to prevent the supply of more modern weapons to Ukraine.

The publication draws attention not only to the statements of representatives of the Russian authorities, but also to the opinion of patriotic Russian analysts. For example, political scientist Sergei Karaganov admitted the possibility of a nuclear strike against any of the NATO countries. He noted that the United States with a 99% guarantee will not use nuclear weapons against Russia in response. This is possible only if there is a “crazy man” in the White House who is ready to risk Boston for the sake of Poznan,” Karaganov said.

At the same time, publications about the possibility of nuclear war appear in the American and European press more and more often. This is a worrying sign, because this is how the notorious “Overton window” works. One gets the impression that the Western public is gradually being prepared for the reality of a large-scale conflict with an exchange of nuclear strikes.

What is the saddest thing, in contrast to the times of the Cold War, the same Caribbean crisis, in power in Western countries are people who are very inferior intellectually to their predecessors. Biden is not Kennedy, and Macron is not de Gaulle. Modern Western leaders have little idea of ​​the catastrophic nature of the implementation of the nuclear scenario due to banal gaps in natural science knowledge or due to developing dementia.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    29 September 2022 08: 28
    Because they perceive it so easily, they plan to sit out in comfortable bunkers with air filters, a supply of water and food and other goodies. Ordinary people will burn, including rednecks - they will not even be allowed into these bunkers on the threshold. And the kykosis will come to Europe - even if it doesn’t fly from there from the Amer base - it will cover it with exhaust after the explosions - it won’t seem enough. Although some kind of Amerian parliamentarian already triedndel - like the Japanese survived and nothing, some even lived to be 100 years old.

    In general, they are going to thin out the population of the Earth, the globalists are fucking.
    1. +14
      29 September 2022 08: 32
      They staged a sabotage on gas pipelines, they can easily arrange a sabotage with nuclear weapons anywhere in the NATO countries and announce that Russia did it. We have entered a dangerous period...
      1. +1
        29 September 2022 08: 33
        Quote: Tartar 174
        They staged a sabotage on gas pipelines, they can easily arrange a sabotage with nuclear weapons anywhere in the NATO countries and announce that Russia did it. We have entered a dangerous period...
        ICHSH - they will do ...
      2. +4
        29 September 2022 08: 53
        Looking at the events of recent history: no evidence is needed anymore, the main thing is to point your finger and yell louder!
      3. 0
        29 September 2022 09: 35
        After rumors about a "dirty" bomb appeared, the United States and Great Britain contacted our military department. Maybe not quite yet the brains have atrophied.
    2. +3
      29 September 2022 08: 34
      No, this time they can’t sit out across the ocean, it’s bad that they perceive nuclear war as a game on a computer, it’s somewhere far away, like in Japan, which became accommodating and best friend of the United States after the bombing.
    3. 0
      29 September 2022 08: 37
      Here, at VO, I remember they constantly offered to work out nuclear weapons in Ukraine))
      1. 0
        29 September 2022 08: 58
        now there are more and more
    4. Maz
      +13
      29 September 2022 08: 43
      We have volume explosion bombs with a capacity of up to 44 tons of conventional explosives, this is a mini nuclear charge. Why pollute the earth with radiation if you can safely burn out the fortified areas of the ukrovermacht with high-power vacuum volumetric detonating bombs?
      1. -8
        29 September 2022 08: 45
        Shoigu call back on this matter, please. Maybe he will listen.
      2. +1
        29 September 2022 09: 15
        On the enemy with thermobaric ammunition.
      3. -1
        29 September 2022 10: 16
        We have bombs, we have missiles, there is not one thing - political will.
      4. 0
        29 September 2022 11: 03
        Quote: Maz
        We have volume explosion bombs with a capacity of up to 44 tons of conventional explosives, this is a mini nuclear charge. Why pollute the earth with radiation if you can safely burn out the fortified areas of the ukrovermacht with high-power vacuum volumetric detonating bombs?

        These bombs do not fly themselves, which means they will have to be dragged by the Tu-160 or Tu-95, with unsuppressed air defense and NATO target designation, they flew in Georgia for reconnaissance, how did it end?
      5. 0
        29 September 2022 13: 38
        Because there are no vacuum bombs in nature. Learn the mat part.
    5. -1
      29 September 2022 08: 47
      Because they perceive it so easily, they plan to sit out in comfortable bunkers with air filters, a supply of water and food and other goodies.

      Not without reason, they simply do not believe in our red lines, which we give rise to every day. Moreover, with our "restraint/wisdom" we provoke them to promote the conflict and a more difficult denouement.
      1. 0
        29 September 2022 08: 48
        Of course, they do not believe - so many times they promised one thing, but in reality they acted almost exactly the opposite. Will you personally, for example, take such an enemy seriously after this? Probably not. And you will push through your decision with neat small steps. To not be very visible. A little there, a little here. And then how to consider everything together - so they pushed through their decision.
  2. +6
    29 September 2022 08: 29
    It won't lead to good. crying... Every day, articles about a nuclear strike come out
  3. +5
    29 September 2022 08: 30
    By experience.
    If America starts screaming at the top of its voice about democracy and human rights, it means that they are going to bomb someone. So, they are preparing another muck.
    If the striped ones are seriously talking about the "Russian nuclear threat", then either Kyiv will be given tactical nuclear charges, or we must wait for a provocation with the use of tactical nuclear weapons by them, followed by accusations of Russia.
    No one in the West will understand from the word "absolutely" - an explosion, "mushroom", "Russia is to blame."

    In the event of a provocation, tactical nuclear weapons will DEFINITELY go to Ukraine, if it is not there yet. Anything can be expected from a terrorist state.
    1. +1
      29 September 2022 08: 33
      In any war in its course, the stakes are raised, and what seemed unacceptable and unthinkable at the beginning of the war becomes mandatory over time. For example, in the Civil War in Russia, at the beginning of the war, prisoners were released on parole that they would no longer fight, then they began to shoot the prisoners. You can remember how at the beginning of the SVO, captured Ukrainians were also released on a subscription that they would no longer fight, now they don’t even stutter about this, since even the most stupid it became clear that the released Ukrainians would fight again as part of the Ukrainian army. Or, as at the beginning of the Second World War, the Germans and the British did not bomb the cities, they tried to bomb only military targets, but over time, all sides switched to total carpet bombing precisely in the cities for great victims. So I am sure that nuclear weapons will be used in Ukraine.
      1. +1
        29 September 2022 08: 50
        "For example, in the Civil War in Russia, at the beginning of the war, prisoners were released on parole" (c)
        On parole, the Reds were released, they began to behave harshly in response to the White Terror.
        1. -1
          29 September 2022 09: 07
          Quote: IvanIvanov
          On parole, the Reds were released, they began to behave harshly in response to the White Terror.

          Well, I think everyone knows that. In fact, the Bolsheviks were the legitimate power in Russia, and the whites are ordinary rebels. The main mistake of the Bolsheviks, which led to the Civil War, was the dissolution of the former tsarist army. Left without a livelihood, the former officers of the tsarist army rushed south to the Volunteer Army, where 65% of the personnel were former officers. If the Bolsheviks, having taken power into their own hands, would have stopped the decomposition of the army and immediately began to reassemble it, then most likely there would be no Civil War as we know it. The maximum would have to pacify the separatists in Ukraine and Transcaucasia.
    2. +1
      29 September 2022 08: 41
      there are no objects in Ukraine that stand for the use of tactical nuclear weapons against them. The closest facility is the Rzeszow base in Poland and the air bases in Poland and Romania ... well, if necessary ... in Ukraine now there is work for the infantry, there are practically no tanks there, all imported armored vehicles from the wheels immediately to the front and are burned dozens a day.
    3. +2
      29 September 2022 09: 15
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      either Kyiv will be given tactical nuclear charges, or we must wait for a provocation with the use of tactical nuclear weapons by them, followed by accusation of Russia.

      There will be nothing new. The Yankees act according to the same scenario. First, screams about the threat of Russia using inhuman weapons, then some "white helmets" will come, they will plant a vigorous land mine in some Zhmerinka, and please, again Russia is to blame
      1. 0
        29 September 2022 15: 19
        Quote: Piramidon
        First, screams about the threat of Russia using inhuman weapons, then some "white helmets" will come, they will plant a vigorous land mine in some Zhmerinka, and please, again Russia is to blame

        It is this scenario that I have been fearing for months. But, apparently, there is nowhere to go - all that remains is to be ready. And not to me, but to those who will have to give an answer to this provocation. Everyone - from Lavrov to Shoigu.

        Quote: Piramidon
        There will be nothing new. The Yankees act according to the same scenario.
        But this always betrays their protruding ears. Manual - no step to the left, no step to the right. Just as their judicial system is precedent, so is the rest of their life - both politics and state terrorism as well.
        It worked then, and it works now. The main thing is strictly according to the recipe.
        I bake pies according to the recipe - I don’t retreat a single gram. And he organized a sabotage or a color revolution once or twice according to the training manual - and, firstly, it won’t work for the third time, and secondly, you won’t have time to blather, when they start pointing fingers at you from all sides.

        "Frau Chancellor" at one time swallowed the wiretapping of her conversations. And the fact that the Germans will now freeze because of "yakshih friends" - will Scholz swallow?
        I have no doubt that sooner or later the Americans will set themselves up with a terrorist attack against the Nord Streams.
    4. 0
      29 September 2022 09: 57
      Quote: Zoldat_A
      If America starts screaming at the top of its voice about democracy and human rights, it means that they are going to bomb someone. So, they are preparing another muck.

      In the event of a provocation, tactical nuclear weapons will DEFINITELY go to Ukraine, if it is not there yet. Anything can be expected from a terrorist state.

      Therefore, it makes no sense to hit the territory of used Ukraine. If only closer to the border with Poland (on a military training ground), or only in order to defeat the accumulation of the Nazi Armed Forces.
      And, here, for example, the state of Gibraltar ... is not even a member of NATO ... and there, after all, British citizens live ... suddenly, ours will miss and instead of used / Ukraine they will fly
  4. -3
    29 September 2022 08: 32
    Instead of mobilization, it would be better to use nuclear weapons. Otherwise, why nuclear weapons at all, if it cannot be used? The enemy must know that Russia will use nuclear weapons without hesitation, only then the enemy will think a hundred times before starting provocations. In general, I believe that Putin was obliged to warn Europe and the United States on February 24 that if at least one tank, at least one artillery system, etc., gets into Ukraine as military assistance, then Russia will be forced to use nuclear weapons. In a one-on-one war with conventional weapons, Russia cannot win against a united Europe and the United States. The population of Europe and the United States is a billion people, and the economy exceeds the Russian economy by dozens of times, Europe and the United States will simply crush Russia with meat, technology and weapons.
  5. -1
    29 September 2022 08: 34
    Complete nonsense, there are no targets in Ukraine for nuclear weapons. But the "partners" with the hands of the Nazis can arrange a provocation at nuclear power plants, this is in their style.
    1. +2
      29 September 2022 09: 09
      You can always find a target for nuclear weapons. And I'm not even talking about directly military purposes. Imagine that the Russian Federation announces in advance that it will launch a nuclear strike on Lviv. Ten million refugees will immediately flee to Poland and Romania. Economic and transport collapse is guaranteed. A humanitarian catastrophe on a European scale.
      1. 0
        29 September 2022 09: 12
        Firstly, in order to use nuclear weapons, you need to "have eggs", and secondly, from the use of even tactical nuclear weapons there will be more minuses than pluses. In general, there will be no pluses, only minuses.
  6. 0
    29 September 2022 08: 34
    The Western media are talking about our use of a vigorous loaf in "Ukraine" because it is convenient for them. They have the right to answer or not to answer. They decide if there is a chance to remain in their world. The United States does not give them a chance to stay in their parallel world. This topic is banned for them, they will definitely lose there. Let's see in the President's statement how he is going to ensure the safety of the people who entrusted their lives to him in referendums.
  7. +2
    29 September 2022 08: 35
    I won’t say for the striped ones, in the event of a TNW strike on the Pshek’s logistics, but Lizka will definitely press from the highway .... The fifth wheel in the NVO prevents the campaign from smashing bridges and railway junctions on the outskirts in order to block the supply channels of Western weapons ... To pay with the lives of the guys on the front end for some kind of agreement ...., we are not in the situation to wait for the behind-the-scenes ultimatums of the Anglo-Saxons ..., already on the defensive .... 7 months after the NWO after kickbacks, redeployments, etc. .
  8. +8
    29 September 2022 08: 37
    All this is good or bad, to whom that is closer. Personally, I expected the Russian Federation in the NWO to repeat the Yugoslav scenario, tobish how the United States carried the country into the 19th century.
    I repeat, not hospitals and maternity hospitals, but electrical substations, traction substations and water intakes. It’s not so simple with bridges, I admit, they need a lot of cruise missiles, and the enemy has Soviet air defense (which is kindly silent, waiting for data from NATO and will be waiting for our bombers with FAB-500).
    Critics say that we will restore it later and there are "brotherly" besotted people who should not sit by candlelight and a kerosene lamp even in summer. In general, the communal collapse and civil chaos supposedly will not affect the combat capability of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
    And now yesterday's installers of air conditioners and plumbing will be somewhere near Maryinka and Avdiivka to storm the trenches of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
    Why did the USSR leave thousands of missiles and design schools to us, which helped Caliber, Zircon, Dagger and the family of missiles to appear Х I do not know?!
    Will the question really soon arise: why did grandfather Stalin and Beria leave atomic weapons to us?
    If we have trench warfare in places, can we abandon the missile forces? Artillery still endures the war turns out?
    1. -1
      30 September 2022 08: 16
      Quote: Nevsky_ZU
      Artillery still endures the war turns out?

      Artillerymen write that now the old D-20 howitzers are being withdrawn from the NM of the LPR and DPR and they are being transferred to the Russian army, since the ammunition for the Msta and Giacint howitzers has already been shot, for the D-20 there are so far, but on all will not be enough. With the same caliber, there are different ballistic solutions. And the D-1 of the 1943 model will go to the people's militias, for now there are enough BCs for them. D-20 fired at 17 km, and D-1 at 12 km. With the D-20, they fired at the maximum range because of the counter-battery fight, which the Kyiv partners love and use.
  9. +4
    29 September 2022 08: 40
    If Russia does not apply first, they will hand over missiles with nuclear warheads to Ukraine, and Russia will have to answer. The world seems to be doomed to nuclear war, but the US hopes that it is not for the project of their territory.
  10. +3
    29 September 2022 08: 40
    The United States would have used nuclear weapons in such a situation. How they used it in Japan in 1945 and planned to use it in Korea in 1953. Naturally, they are trying on such a situation for Russia, when the flow of Western weapons to Ukraine does not dry up, and the war has clearly reached a dead end, when neither side can get a clear superiority on the battlefield. But the use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia will give it this superiority immediately. Or what other options are there? Call on another million reservists, form four combined arms armies and one tank army from them, and start a Ukrainian offensive operation in the style of the Great Patriotic War in a year? Of course it is possible. But long and expensive. And the socio-economic effect, again.
    1. +6
      29 September 2022 09: 01
      In a year, we will start a campaign to elect the President. Until then, everything should be decided.
    2. +1
      29 September 2022 09: 59
      Quote: Roma-1977
      The United States would have used nuclear weapons in such a situation. How they used it in Japan in 1945 and planned to use it in Korea in 1953

      Neither in Korea, nor in Vietnam, nor in Afghanistan were they used. And the situation for them there was worse. They just slipped away silently. It's here, on VO in the comments it's easy to press the "red buttons".
      1. 0
        29 September 2022 11: 10
        In Korea, the use of nuclear weapons was actually planned when the war turned into a positional one, and the United States had nothing to oppose on the battlefield to the numerical superiority of Chinese volunteers. In Afghanistan or Vietnam, the use of nuclear weapons did not make any sense, because there was a sluggish guerrilla war, and not a classic one.
        1. 0
          29 September 2022 11: 39
          Quote: Roma-1977
          In Korea, the use of nuclear weapons was really planned

          They planned a lot. Dozens of such plans were developed against the USSR. And in fact, the instinct of self-preservation prevailed over their plans.
    3. 0
      30 September 2022 06: 38
      and the consequences of nuclear weapons are not expensive to restore ?? and the contamination of territories, how is it ?? you would be a little interested in the question!!
      1. 0
        30 September 2022 08: 20
        Let Poland restore the consequences of nuclear weapons. It is she who wants those territories that should be covered.
  11. -4
    29 September 2022 08: 41
    Nuclear weapon? Nuclear weapons will make us outcasts in the world, they can now only be used by the enemies of Russia. To begin with, you need to destroy electricity, gas, communications, this will be more than enough to slow down the supply of Western equipment and wreak havoc.
    1. -1
      29 September 2022 08: 45
      Quote from Eva Star
      To begin with, you need to destroy electricity, gas, communications, this will be more than enough to slow down the supply of Western equipment and wreak havoc.

      Is there political will? Who didn't let them do it for 7 months?
    2. +3
      29 September 2022 09: 03
      As? Make Russia an outcast? In terms of sanctions, visas will no longer be issued, assets will be arrested, swift will be turned off, athletes will be banned from performing under the flag and anthem of the Russian Federation? So already kagbe everything is already applied against Russia. You can uncover warheads - it won't get any worse.
      1. -6
        29 September 2022 09: 07
        No, it will be easier for Europe to force China and India to impose sanctions, but for us this is a disaster.
        1. +3
          29 September 2022 09: 32
          Why would this be a disaster? China and India do business with Russia not because they are so kind, but because doing business with Russia is a profitable business. If their political leadership is so spineless that it can abandon national interests in favor of the United States, then the partnership of the Russian Federation with such countries does not initially make sense, and you need to rely only on your own strength. Yes, it will require the restructuring of the entire economy and the transfer of the entire country to a military footing, in the "besieged fortress" mode. But it so happened historically that the "besieged fortress" regime is the natural state of Russia. Thank God - not North Korea and not Cuba, but the largest owner of natural resources, arable land and a full cycle of self-developed energy technologies.
  12. +1
    29 September 2022 08: 45
    The American press writes about the "reality" of the use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine

    This essence of the female dog is manifested in the fact that the situation is artificially brought to the point of no return, and then they squeal from all sides: “We told you! We warned you!”
    Doesn't it remind you of the situation before February 24th?
  13. +1
    29 September 2022 08: 46
    Americans can do it easily.
    1. They are far away and feel safe.
    2. They solve several issues at once (they remove the EU competitor and seize the resources of the Russian Federation).
    3. An innate sense of self-righteousness and impunity.
  14. -1
    29 September 2022 08: 50
    According to the author of the publication, Putin is most worried about maintaining his power. Allegedly, a defeat in Ukraine could threaten his 22-year rule, so he is ready for any measures to prevent the fiasco of a special military operation.

    If one can fully agree with the first part of this formulation, then not with the second. He does not want to take any radical measures, even excluding nuclear weapons, and maybe he cannot. Now the entire SVO is stuck in a "slightly pregnant" state.
  15. +3
    29 September 2022 08: 57
    The worst thing is not that. The worst thing is that since the time of Kennedy and de Gaulle, such a system of power has been built in the West, in which the people elect only wooden pinocchio. Not necessarily stupid, but not making any decisions. At the same time, they are responsible for everything. In other words, the true power in the West belongs to groups of people that no one elects and no one changes. Various kinds of "advisers", "deputies" and so on. Gray Cardinals. It is they who develop and shape all decisions. And then they slip it to the pinocchio presidents for signature. Won't you sign? Well, it will be the same as with Kennedy or de Gaulle. Signed? Everything, from now on Pinocchio is responsible for this decision. And those who invented it, are not responsible for anything. They have a ready excuse: "Biden said, Biden ordered, Biden did, Biden is to blame..."

    That is, the main danger of Western civilization is that people who have real power and make decisions do not bear any responsibility for their consequences. Even moral.
  16. +4
    29 September 2022 08: 59
    Now they will explode a dirty bomb in Ukraine and accuse Russia of using nuclear weapons, there are no laws and concepts now ....
  17. +2
    29 September 2022 09: 01
    NSDC Danilov, has already hinted at the imminent appearance in the arsenal of the Kyiv junta of the so-called "dirty" atomic bomb, as a weapon of retaliation and deterrence. And Washington and London will only shrug. Also, "the most powerful Jew in the world" sends a signal that Ukraine has the right to strike with nuclear weapons at Russia. There are rumors on the Ukrnet that a secret headquarters with nuclear scientists and the military is already operating on Bankovaya, who are urgently preparing a group for the development of nuclear weapons, and it is possible that in the coming days Kyiv will already announce the creation of an atomic bomb. The Britons help a lot in the nuclear project, they are genetic Russophobes. The West can easily give someone a disassembled atomic bomb, but they are faced with the task of convincing the world community that it was the independence supporters who made their own bomb, albeit a “dirty” one. The most likely scientific center for the creation of the yellow-blakite "dirty" bomb is the Kyiv Institute for Nuclear Research, as well as the facilities of the Khmelnitsky and Rovno nuclear power plants. . Its specialists have been dealing with the problems of Chernobyl for many years and have the most extensive knowledge of radioactive contamination of territories.
    A simple "dirty" bomb, in which TNT is mixed with uranium or plutonium, is unlikely to lead to a national catastrophe. Yes, there will be an exclusion zone, but its radius, with a high probability, will not exceed 20–30 km.
    Israel has conducted a series of dirty bomb tests in the Negev desert, as reported by the Haaretz newspaper in 2015. They were explosives with radioactive material. These devices were found to be dangerous only in the event of strong winds, but even then the effects were limited. Although under the guise of allegedly developing a "dirty" bomb, work can be carried out in Kyiv to create a real atomic warhead.
    There is work for the Russian Aerospace Forces.
  18. -1
    29 September 2022 09: 19
    Dementia resisted fiercely. fool
  19. 0
    29 September 2022 09: 24
    the American terrorist state can do this easily, especially since it has experience in killing civilians with the help of nuclear weapons
  20. 0
    29 September 2022 09: 30
    If the West allows dill to create a "dirty" bomb, this is a global catastrophe. Because dill is insane. Our use of tactical nuclear weapons is the last argument of the king. It must be left in case the front crumbles in all directions and there is a real threat of a full-fledged invasion of our territory (including, of course, Crimea). Only dill and their partners need to form a clear understanding: this will be done.
    1. 0
      29 September 2022 09: 46
      I partially disagree. The war is already on. How to end it quickly without using nuclear weapons? Wait for the enemy to use it first? Or wait until Ukraine receives combat aircraft, tanks and cruise missiles in quantities exceeding Russian ones?
      1. 0
        29 September 2022 09: 52
        Quote: Roma-1977
        I partially disagree. The war is already on. How to end it quickly without using nuclear weapons? Wait for the enemy to use it first? Or wait until Ukraine receives combat aircraft, tanks and cruise missiles in quantities exceeding Russian ones?

        Unfortunately yes, wait. Because TNW is an extreme option, if it’s already everything.
  21. 0
    29 September 2022 11: 49
    The intelligence of "these people" does not play a role. Everything has long been controlled by artificial intelligence (AI).
  22. +1
    29 September 2022 13: 56
    A nuclear provocation in Ukraine will definitely take place now .. The Polish authorities are distributing iodine tablets in the divisions of the State Fire Protection, the Deputy Minister of the Interior and the Administration of Blessed Pobozhi said on the air of Polish television .. Well, this is "just like that, just in case of a fire", right? So the conversations started not just like that. Now, after the gas pipelines were blown up, in the event of a serious response from us, either a nuclear power plant will definitely blow up in Ukraine, or (more likely) they will give the Ukrainians a long-range missile with a charge ... to provoke our nuclear strike on Ukraine .. And then there will be no talk not needed by either side.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"