Military Review

Pilot fighter with UVP MiG-23PD

8
The design of the MiG-23 front-line fighter began in accordance with the decree of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the USSR Council of Ministers of 03.12.1963, which provided for the creation of a promising fighter with enhanced flight performance and a new C-23 weapon system. The C-23 should have included: TP-23 heat finder, Sapphire-23 radar, small automatic ASP-23 sight, K-23 medium-range guided missiles and X-23 tactical guided missiles "air-to-surface". TTX to the aircraft were refined in the 1964 year. First of all, they were related to ensuring the operation of the aircraft from damaged or short runways. It was of special importance to take-off from damaged runways, so it was decided to provide special devices in the aircraft structure that would reduce the run-up and run length (they wanted to reduce it to 180-200 meters).

Pilot fighter with UVP MiG-23PD


Behind the cockpit of the fighter inside the fuselage of the fighter, it was planned to vertically install a pair of additional lifting engines RD36-35 (thrust each 2350 kgf) developed in the OKB-36 MAP under the guidance of the chief designer Kolesov P.A. Additional engines had to be switched on only during takeoff / landing modes, in order to create a tangible increase in wing lift. The installation of additional lift engines in 1966-1967 worked on the experimental E-7PD (23-01, later received the designation MiG-23PD), which was created on the basis of the serial MiG-21С. The MiG-23 (23-01) was close to the MiG-21 fighter in terms of its aerodynamic layout, it had horizontal tail and a medium-delta wing. This used a new design of the fuselage. A new engine was installed on the aircraft - a turbojet engine with an afterburner chamber Р27Ф-300 (thrust 7800 kgf), developed under the guidance of general designer Tumansky S.К. in OKB-300 MAP - and side air intakes with a semicircular cross-section. In this case, the entire nose of the fuselage could be used under a powerful radar station. The construction of an experienced MiG-23, having lift engines, began in March of the 1966 year, it lasted 8 months. On November 30, the 1966 was relocated to Zhukovsky at the LIS OKB, where prior to the delivery of the flight copy of the Р27Ф-300, its ground testing was carried out. The first copy of the MiG-23 (23-01), which was the only one, was not equipped with the command radio guidance equipment and a radar station — instead, they were equipped with auxiliary protection units (monitoring and recording equipment).

There was no gun on the plane yet. The first flight of the aircraft 23-01 (onboard №23) passed 3 on April 1967. The car was driven by test pilot Ostapenko P.M. July 9 Ostapenko demonstrated the takeoff / landing of a new fighter at Domodedovo at an aviation parade. However, work on this aircraft soon ceased.

Even before the testing of the experimental 23-01 aircraft began, it became clear that the scheme with additional lifting engines had no great prospects. Additional engines occupied a lot of space in the fuselage, significantly reducing payload and useful fuel for fuel, and only a few minutes were used during the flight. Considering the requirement to increase the duration and range of the flight, for the further implementation of the program for the MiG-23 fighter aircraft, another version of the aircraft layout was adopted, which included the use of a variable geometry wing.

The following is a description of the aircraft taken from the book of OPLOV BA. "Notes of the test pilot."



“All over the world, in those years, work was intensively carried out on planes with vertical take-off and landing and planes with short mileage and run. In France, tested the plane "Balzac", which was built on the basis of the Mirage 3 fighter, having engines to create vertical thrust. The British successfully used the "Hariep", one engine of which served for horizontal flight and vertical take-off / landing. In the USSR, the Yakovlev Design Bureau created the Yak-36, which had a main engine and lift engines, which worked only during takeoff / landing. We and “Sukhovtsy” investigated the possibility of reducing the landing and take-off distances with the help of small vertical thrust engines, which could not lift the plane vertically, but seemed to reduce the weight of the aircraft. For this purpose, Cy-15DB was built at the Sykhoi Design Bureau on the basis of the Cy-15 interceptor fighter, installing lifting engines on it. We put two lift engines on a slightly modified MiG-21 fighter. The experimental aircraft was called the “23-31 product”. Ostapenko P.M. lifted this car in June 1966 of the year.

Lifting engines on the 23-31 aircraft were located in the middle part of the fuselage. This significantly reduced the volume of fuel tanks, and therefore the flight time of the aircraft was reduced to 15-17 minutes. The landing gear was not removed because it had no place to remove due to the installation of lift engines, so the car did not rise above 1,5 km. And there was nothing for the plane to do at high altitudes, since it was mainly the behavior of the aircraft that was tested during takeoff and landing. Exhaust nozzles of lifting engines were supplied with specials. grids that deflected the gas stream back to 10 hail. and forward on 5 hail, which increased the overall thrust at takeoff, and the forward deflected jet during landing played the role of a gas brake.

Takeoff and landing were not easy. Exhaust jet, created by lifting engines, spread out y of the ground to the sides, creating a sucking effect; as the altitude and speed changed, the effect of this effect affected the lift force of the aircraft, as well as its controllability and stability. If there were a few problems during the take-off — a slight rebalancing, that is, a change in the pitch angle with the fixed control knob — after the takeoff from the ground was not a particular difficulty for the pilot, then during the landing, besides rebalancing, this “leakage” caused an energetic decrease in the apparatus and the same inhibition. In this regard, just before landing, it was necessary to increase the thrust of the main engine to the maximum, and in some cases even turn on the compression ...



While sorting out the flight schedules with Fedotov, we came across Ostapenko's report on the implementation of the flight task on the 23-11 aircraft, where he wrote: “Taking off at maximum load, landing at the afterburner”. At first we thought that Petr Maksimovich was wrong, but he didn’t think to be wrong - as it turned out, that was exactly what happened ...

All this greatly complicated the execution of takeoff and landing on this machine, and the big gain in the length of the take-off distance due to the apparent weight loss did not work.

Despite this, the construction of the previously laid prototype aircraft was carried out according to this scheme, and in March 1967 raised the MiG-23-01, a beautiful airplane with a sharp nose, side semicircular air intakes, a new powerful engine. On it, Ostapenko made several dozen flights, flew to Domodedovo at a parade, and on this plane finished his history - they gave him somewhere, to the museum, in my opinion, in MAI. A couple of flights on the MiG-23-01 except Peter Maximovitch, made Fedotov.

Such a scheme did not justify itself, although the mileage and run on the MiG-23-01 were relatively small - it was too expensive to carry engines that were used only during takeoff / landing, which took the place of equipment and fuel.

“Sukhovtsy”, flying on Сy-15ВД - mainly, the test pilot E.S. Solovyov, - and having tested the T-6 with elevating engines, they understood that “the game is not worth the candle”. After that, they built a T-6 with a variable sweep wing - the famous bomber Cy-24.

I was appointed understudy Ostapenko, which greatly raised me in my own eyes. I accompanied Petr Maksimovich several times with a cameraman on the MiG-21, and then I myself flew on this interesting plane. Unfortunately, I soon had to fly on a long trip, and I made subsequent flights on this plane in late autumn, when the main part of the program was finished. It didn’t do without “introductory” - during one flight I took off without being convinced that one lifting engine reached the “maximum”. Of course, I made a blunder, for which I received a small “plug” from Fedotov, but the green light of the engine output signal for maximum mode was very poorly visible, especially in bright light.




With the advent of the MiG-23-01, the first experimental vehicle equipped with elevating engines flew little during the tests, but it was decided to show it at Domodedovo parade, so several dozen training flights and a demonstration flight took place during the parade. Then this car finished its flight existence. "

Aircraft performance characteristics:
Modification - MiG-23PD;
Wingspan - 7,72 m;
Length - 16,80 m;
Height - 5,15 m;
Wing area - 40 m2;
Empty weight - 11200 kg;
Maximum take-off weight - 18500 kg;
Type of the main engine - TRDF P-27-300;
Type of auxiliary engine - 2ХТРД РД-36-35;
Traction unformed main engine - 7800 kgf;
Unforced auxiliary engine - kgn; 2x2350;
Maximum speed - 1600 km / h;
Crew - 1 man;
Armament - 23-mm gun.
8 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. black_eagle
    black_eagle 23 October 2012 12: 04
    +1
    How many things were tested, checked, how many experiments were done! And now they released a couple of PAK FA - pride in the nation - not that! wrong level ...
    1. Yars
      Yars 24 October 2012 13: 24
      0
      not yet evening! ! !
  2. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 23 October 2012 16: 15
    +4
    Interesting car. Unusual ... Honestly, I did not even suspect about its existence ... Thanks to the author for telling about her ...

    In addition to her, there were several more options for the MiG-23. For example, the MiG-23E8. In the photo, the MiG-23E8 (2) version ...
    And by the way, note, it is also a direct development of the MiG-21 ... As far as I know, it was planned to form an air wing of Soviet aircraft carriers from the MiG-23E8. But in those years, aircraft carriers did not happen, and the MiG-23 became an exclusively "land" vehicle. And its final appearance has acquired slightly different features ...
  3. gregor6549
    gregor6549 23 October 2012 17: 00
    +1
    In general, serious work on the development of "litak" with vertical takeoff and landing began in the USSR in the mid-50s with the development of the "Turbolet" stand. http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turboleot.

    Unfortunately, successful production aircraft of vertical take-off and landing in the USSR could not be made. And in the West there is nothing but the English Harrier and his modifications in the series so far ..

    Perhaps the United States will be able to bring to mind the option F35B VSTOL https://f35.com/the-f-35/f-35-overview/multirole-variants/f-35b-stovl.aspx, but so far it’s not so smooth, as they would like.
    1. alex86
      alex86 23 October 2012 19: 52
      0
      And the yak-38-41-141 you don't think is successful? Of course, there were many comments, and the continuation of the idea with separate lift engines was clearly a failure, but it seems to me that vertical takeoff and landing could have a niche of its own. I read the assessment of the pilots who flew the Yak-38 in Afghanistan, from their point of view they were more effective than the Su-25 in terms of load and radius. And from the point of view of our lack of aircraft carriers, VTOL aircraft could serve as a kind of replacement when basing on something "flat". It is clear that in the 90s there was no time for fat, but the developments remained, but it seems that there is no movement. And in the same F-35 the rotary nozzle is taken from the Yak.
      1. klimpopov
        klimpopov 23 October 2012 21: 07
        +1
        Definitely a plus, and the Harrier is not such a bad plane.


      2. cherkas.oe
        cherkas.oe 23 October 2012 23: 46
        +1
        Not a single pilot flying both on the yak and on the 25th could say that the yak is superior to the 25th in terms of efficiency and radius of action.
      3. gregor6549
        gregor6549 24 October 2012 07: 24
        +1
        The Yak 38 you mentioned is not considered successful. Their already small radius in 370 km with 6 bombs of 100 kg in Afghanistan was reduced even more due to loss of traction to 1500kg (high mountains, heat, etc.) and the combat load decreased accordingly. Several YAK38s were driven to Afghanistan to see how they would behave in the highlands and were also quickly removed (after a month) due to shortness of breath and weakness. But SU25 was the very aircraft that was needed in Afghanistan. It was difficult to say whether subsequent modifications of the Yak with vertical take-off and landing, including the Yak141, were better than the Yak38. nobody saw them either in large-scale serial production or in real business. And about the rotary nozzle. It is difficult to say who borrowed from whom and what. Usually priority issues are resolved by patenting, and not domestic, but international. Was the idea of ​​a rotary nozzle first patented by the USSR, and in particular by the firm of Yakovlev I can’t say, I did not delve into it. But in this case, it is important not who was the first to put forward the idea, but who, how and where realized it, as well as what and to whom the benefit came from this. In the cases of Harriers and F35, the idea of ​​a rotary nozzle is obvious to whom it has benefited.