The United States will work out the "rapid deployment" of the MLRS HIMARS in the territory of Latvia

38
The United States will work out the "rapid deployment" of the MLRS HIMARS in the territory of Latvia

The United States will deploy HIMARS rocket launchers to Latvia as part of Exercise NAMEJS, demonstrating "rapid deployment" of the systems on NATO's eastern flank. This was reported in a press release from the command of the US Army in Europe and Africa.

The US will transfer two HIMARS MLRS to Latvia, after which they will be deployed in two different regions of the country as part of the NAMEJS exercises. Two C-130 military transport aircraft will be used for the transfer. It is worth noting that this is not the first deployment of these complexes on Latvian territory, as well as the M270 MLRS. In May of this year, firing was carried out at the Adazi military base as part of the Summer Shield 2022 exercises.



The US Army Europe and Africa Command will deploy two M142 MLRS (HIMARS) and about ten troops to Latvia in support of the NAMEJS national readiness exercise on September 26 to demonstrate the rapid deployment of a precision-guided weapons long-range on NATO's eastern flank

- said in a statement.

Earlier, all three Baltic republics announced plans to purchase American MLRS HIMARS, and Estonia and Lithuania have already begun to purchase. In July of this year, the US State Department approved the supply of six MLRS and ammunition to Tallinn. Estonia plans to receive all six new MLRS by 2025. The contract value is $500 million. In addition, Estonia plans to receive both conventional ammunition and long-range missiles capable of delivering strikes at a distance of up to 300 km.

By issuing permission to supply these complexes to the Baltic countries, the United States is actually deploying missiles with a firing range of up to 300 km near the borders of Russia, and upon receipt of PrSM - up to 500 and more. And there are no restrictions on accommodation here.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    26 September 2022 12: 07
    Have you come? Did you jump? Did you jump? Now solve the problem.
    1. +8
      26 September 2022 12: 09
      This problem appeared in 1992: why tear hairs now?
      1. +2
        26 September 2022 12: 12
        Oh well? Who fed the Balts and Ukraine with oil, gas and transit income?
        1. +4
          26 September 2022 12: 13
          Oh well? Who fed the Balts and Ukraine with oil, gas and transit income

          Who?
        2. 0
          26 September 2022 12: 44
          Yeah, the Balts just snickered))))
    2. -3
      26 September 2022 12: 10
      Quote: iouris
      Have you come? Did you jump? Did you jump? Now solve the problem.

      Why, Shoigu handed out such binoculars to us, we admire .... It is high time to revise or cancel all agreements on satellites and aircraft.
    3. 0
      26 September 2022 12: 30
      Decided, don't be fooled. And more serious problems were solved.
    4. 0
      27 September 2022 09: 22
      The problem is solved very simply, by the lack of ports and airfields. The railway is cut from Belorussia to Kaliningrad and ............ fso, tribalts in a paddock.
  2. +4
    26 September 2022 12: 12
    C - 130 flies faster than Vanguard, Zircon and Voyevoda? bully
    1. +1
      26 September 2022 12: 45
      The plane is large, not every airfield will accept it. Please bomb suitable lanes
      1. 0
        26 September 2022 13: 46
        Something in Ukraine does not prevent anyone from supplying weapons .. Do you think this will not work with the Baltic states? Everything will work out in the same way .. Only instead of Belgorod it will be Pskov, for example ..
        1. -1
          26 September 2022 14: 22
          Quote: Dikson
          Something in Ukraine does not prevent anyone from supplying weapons .. Do you think this will not work with the Baltic states? It will work exactly the same..

          Exactly the same - it will not work in any case. Ukraine is almost one and a half thousand linear kilometers of deep rear, filled with dozens of equipped runways for the largest liners and transport workers. And Latvia is 200 km at the farthest point from our border. And there are orders of magnitude less high-quality runways than in Ukraine. And those single ones that are available are even available to our front-line MLRS, capable of throwing up to a distance of 120-130 km. (for example, Tornado-S and Uragan-1M). And for SMD missiles - there’s nothing to even talk about. With them, ours will be able to shoot at sprat militarists even from Moscow :))
          I don’t know how events will develop there in general ... but in matters of our helplessness to prevent US air supplies of weapons like in Ukraine, it certainly won’t happen with Latvia, since all of Latvia is shot through from Russian territory, even without other installations leaving places permanent deployment.
          1. 0
            26 September 2022 15: 45
            The Baltics are full members of NATO .. ​​So ours will think for a long time before responding with anything other than "concerns" in which case .. And therefore, at least a hundred "Chimeras" will appear there - we can’t say anything. Until their first salvo across Russia...
            1. 0
              27 September 2022 09: 15
              Since when did the rug under the door become a member of the family??? lol
              1. 0
                27 September 2022 10: 17
                You know, I honestly don’t understand stupid bravado or boorish-pejorative attitude towards citizens of any country .. "black monkeys", "stupid Americans", "braked Balts" or there "Jews cunningly ... invented" .. It's all stupid and idiotically presumptuous .. Remind you about "white tights"? How many of our boys died at the hands of these "incompetent" Balts and "rugs at the threshold", as you called them here .. They are our enemies. And enemies must be taken seriously. So that later you don’t wave your hands into the empty, wiping bloody snot ..
                1. 0
                  27 September 2022 10: 34
                  Do not mix political and sarcastic assessments with pantyhose. I traveled around the SOVIET Baltic states during the Soviet era and never heard a rude word. And what they are doing now speaks of their lack of independence, ours will come and they will sing other songs, so they will always be a rug until they hit their horns, but it is very expensive, this is called sovereignty, which they will never have. This is not their fault, this is their sad lot, especially since the Great Peter bought them from the Swedes. Well, they have a plan.
                  1. -1
                    28 September 2022 08: 13
                    ours will come and they will sing other songs

                    Of course, when we kill 1%, we plant 10% and another 20-30% will leave. The rest will be afraid and know their place good
                    The trouble is that, assuming such a possibility and knowing about such sentiments among Russians, they (after 10 years of persistent scratching at the door) became part of the NATO member countries.
                    Thus, drastically raising the cost of their "pressing to the nail."
                    Weaker and more attractive candidates are the former republics or CMEA countries, which are not yet part of the bloc.
                    Same Moldova.
                    This is not their fault, this is their sad lot, especially since the Great Peter bought them from the Swedes. Well, they have a plan.

                    This is not the 18th century, remember?
                    Since then, a lot of oxen have flown away. The USA ceased to be a colony, India, China.
        2. 0
          26 September 2022 19: 47
          During the exercises, the transfer is made directly to the Baltic states. When there is another "legend", then we will write about other ways. And by the way, we really prevent them from supplying weapons to the end user.
          1. -1
            27 September 2022 03: 50
            Really? And how? We sink their transports? Blinding pilots on landing with a laser? We unscrew the rails? How can we prevent the transfer of NATO forces between our countries? And by the way, they are very seriously jamming our satellite communications with the beginning of the NWO. But no one talks about it out loud. But in the entire European part of our country there are problems with communication through our satellites and communication with satellites to control them .. That's the thing .. And you are all electronic warfare, electronic warfare, buckets of bolts .. yeah ..
            1. 0
              27 September 2022 19: 47
              If there is a war, we will sink, shoot down, etc.
              1. -1
                27 September 2022 23: 02
                But on the other hand, they will drown, shoot down, etc.
                There are many times more planes, ships - too, the possibilities for their reproduction are an order of magnitude greater.
                And how to be? Unless you try to take them "on the weak", based on their cowardice.
                On the other hand, if the goal is not to return the former imperial territories in the Baltics, then the problem is removed. request
                1. 0
                  27 September 2022 23: 37
                  The Russian Federation clearly has more missiles than the "partners" have transport workers
                  1. -1
                    28 September 2022 06: 52
                    Do you think they will allow them to hit transport workers with impunity, without using superior technology to knock out our missile carriers? what
                    It would be great good
                    1. 0
                      28 September 2022 12: 35
                      We are doing it now and no one is stopping us from striking Ukraine
                      1. -1
                        29 September 2022 07: 38
                        We are doing it now

                        Are we sinking American transport ships with weapons for the Armed Forces of Ukraine? Are we striking airfields in Poland, where this equipment is unloaded from US Air Force aircraft and is stored quite compactly for some time? request
                      2. -1
                        29 September 2022 12: 49
                        There will be a war, we will drown the American ones. Until then, this is all teaching. I'm telling you about our capabilities, but they are. What a stupid, uninteresting interlocutor you are
                      3. -1
                        29 September 2022 16: 38
                        Remember: I originally asked if you think there will be opposition from the other side to our attempts to sink transports.
                        And how effective it will be in the light of their superiority in aviation, people, etc.
                        Will there be retaliatory actions on our military logistics and how sensitive?
    2. 0
      27 September 2022 22: 56
      Do you understand that there will be a bunch of targets all over Europe in an instant?
      And there will be retaliatory strikes, a full-fledged war with the entire Organization (North Atlantic ..)
      Is it possible to divert the attention of the United States by starting a landing in Alaska? what
  3. +5
    26 September 2022 12: 12
    It will no longer be possible to respond symmetrically without loss ...., and we are not the only people with the Tribalts, never once ...
    1. 0
      27 September 2022 09: 14
      Duc in the same Latvia, about 40% of Russians, so it's not over yet.
  4. +3
    26 September 2022 12: 14
    Why shouldn't Russia also declare about the development of targets by the Iskanders, in connection with the threat posed to the security of Russia and the Republic of Belarus? belay
  5. +1
    26 September 2022 12: 19
    The United States will work out the "rapid deployment" of the MLRS HIMARS in the territory of Latvia
    . Well ... is anyone surprised?
  6. +3
    26 September 2022 12: 27
    Quote: rocket757
    Well ... is anyone surprised?

    And why should this be surprising, after they have been in NATO for so many years? News, by and large about anything. If NATO troops and NATO planes have been there for a long time, then why shouldn't there be other NATO weapons there?
    It was necessary to be surprised when they were allowed to swim freely and then to NATO, without conditions.
  7. +1
    26 September 2022 12: 36
    Under whom only these ice creams did not sit. And under the Slavs, Scandinavians, Germans. Now they will be under the impudent Saxons. Such is their history - to be a litter.
    1. +1
      26 September 2022 12: 46
      Quote: bandabas
      Under whom only these ice creams did not sit. And under the Slavs, Scandinavians, Germans. Now they will be under the impudent Saxons. Such is their history - to be a litter.

      Duck, language work, posture and movements have been worked out for centuries. If you have survived to this day, then the system is working laughing And what is humiliating is nothing, accustomed, many even like it, judging by the screams
  8. 0
    26 September 2022 13: 40
    Quote: Fedor M
    Yeah, the Balts just snickered))))

    The trade balance of the Russian Federation is the Baltic states, and along with the Finns and Greece.
  9. +1
    27 September 2022 09: 11
    Well, we will work out their meeting with our Tornadoes right on the positions.
  10. 0
    27 September 2022 22: 58
    "The United States will work out the "rapid deployment" of the MLRS HIMARS in the territory of Latvia"
    wow how are you! this is to use against us ..?
    Well...
    then there will be a "rapid curtailment" of Latvia