Author in a major British publication: As we approach nuclear war, we are fueling conflict in Ukraine, not trying to achieve peace

_{Tests "Sarmat"}

The major British edition of the Daily Mail came out with a publication in which the author asks the British government questions about the specific purpose for which London is militarily helping Ukraine. The article was written by columnist Peter Hitchens.

He writes that, being a British patriot, he is not going to "shy away from a fight." And at the same time, Hitchens frankly writes that the world is approaching nuclear war.

From the material in the British edition:

As we get closer to nuclear war, why are we fomenting conflict in Ukraine rather than trying to achieve peace? What is our interest in Ukraine? Why do we bring weapon and equipment to Ukraine, while our budget is stretched to the limit, and our own troops are short of financial and manpower?

The British observer writes that Britain has ceased to be an open society, otherwise these questions would be asked openly and constantly.

The author writes that he is asking the authorities about how close the war in Ukraine is to "setting Europe on fire" and how close to spilling over to the UK.

Peter Hitchens notes that at one time, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was, to put it mildly, not enthusiastic about Ukrainian nationalism raising its head. When representatives of one of the nationalist organizations in 1990 turned to Thatcher with a question about the possible opening of a British embassy in Kyiv, she replied that it was as impossible as opening a British embassy in Quebec or California.

The author writes that "Western authorities were not interested" in the fact that eventually power in Ukraine passed "from Soviet despots to local despots." Hitchens argues that the West's goal has always been to build democracy, but not at all what Ukraine has since become.

The material cites the statement of the American neo-conservative Robert Kagan:

While it would be wrong to blame the US for Putin's attack on Ukraine, it would be misleading to insist that the invasion was completely unprovoked.

Comments

[dmi.pris1]

Thatcher was a smart enemy and cunning. And these dunces will definitely drag the world into a nuclear abyss

[Lech from Android.]

Quote: dmi.pris

.And these mutts will definitely drag the world into a nuclear abyss

Preparations for this are already underway... Articles are thrown into the Anglo-Saxon media about Russia's alleged use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine and the response of a collective NATO led by the United States.
After that, it remains for the Polish provocateur to undermine a small TNW somewhere near the ZNPP and voila ... there is a basis for bringing NATO troops into the territory of Ukraine ... such a danger will grow with the success of our NMD or KVO.

[Tatar 174]

The world, as you know, is ruled by people, not someone else. Now those who rule are people who are interested in fomenting war, because they have huge profits from this. They are ruining European countries in order to get the maximum profit from this, and if they succeed, they will definitely try (now they are striving for this) to destroy Europe completely and take over everything. Europoliticians are all bought, they are puppets and will not do anything against it. Russia opposes this, many are silent... Now the fate of the world is being decided. The fate of Europe must be taken into their own hands by the inhabitants of European countries, then maybe there will be no destruction of Europe.

[28st region]

Especially the Poles are trying. Strengthen your army, strengthen armored troops. Here they buy 250 Abrams from the Americans, from the Koreans - 1000 tanks are trying to buy the K2 Black Panther.
With the head of the problem, they will be the first to get it.

[Egoza]

Quote: 28st region

Especially the Poles are trying. Strengthen your army, strengthen armored troops. Here they buy 250 Abrams from the Americans, from the Koreans - 1000 tanks are trying to buy the K2 Black Panther.
With the head of the problem, they will be the first to get it.

Although Zelya opened carte blanche to the Poles in Ukraine, gave them equal rights with the Ukrainians, but they are sure that they will have to fight for Galicia and their "legacy", so they are strengthening as best they can. NATO warned them that "if something happens" the Poles will have to cope on their own.

[Pavel73]

There are voices of reason in the West, and there are many of them. But so far, as far as one can judge, the modern Goebbelses are in power. Who are ready to destroy themselves, and their children, and all of humanity. When they are finally convinced that they no longer own the world.

[2112vda]

"the goal of the West has always been to build democracy"

Well, they are building democracy, in the truest sense of the word, along with liberalism. The fact that the West has always been engaged in the substitution of concepts is no secret to anyone. I have to remind once again the real meaning of the terms democracy and liberalism. Since the time of ancient Greece, democracy has been understood as the power of the middle class, namely the wealthy, slave-owning part of it. This is the power of wealthy merchants, large artisans, medium landowners who had the right to vote in making this or that decision. The city-states of Greece had two forms of government. Traditionalist, when the supreme power belonged to the aristocracy, which at the same time was a military estate. In some city-states, the aristocracy was removed from government and all decisions were made at meetings of citizens with the right to vote, who were representatives of the demos. Democracy has never been, is not and will not be the power of the people, because the people are the totality of all classes in a particular state. In the Vedic teaching, figuratively, each estate is represented in the form of one or another human organ or part of the body. The priestly estate, which includes the clergy proper, healers, teachers, engineers and lawyers (lawyers) are presented in the form of a head. The military class is represented by strong hands, the demos is represented by the digestive system and fat deposits, the lower classes are represented by legs, all beggars in general are represented by feet. Well, now think about how an organism or a state controlled by the stomach can live. Therefore, all the constant World crises are from ordinary gluttony and the following hunger. As long as there is an unnatural democratic system of government, we will live from gluttony to starvation and again on a new one. Well, now about liberalism. Libera, this is freedom. Freedom is life according to written laws in the interests of the ruling class, in the modern concept, according to the laws of financiers, capitalists and other representatives of the top of the demos. Russians have such a thing as Will. Will and freedom are not the same thing. If you compare figuratively, freedom is life on a "leash", the length of which depends on your material well-being. Will for a person is life according to the divine Rules and Regulations given from above, that is, life according to Conscience. Every free person imposes self-limitations on himself. In the West, you can do everything that is not prohibited by the Law. We have a saying: "We will judge according to the Law or according to Conscience." The Russians still have the Vedic principles, that's why they hate us so much. Well, liberalism is the previous stage of Nazism.

[Hanurik]

You, with your pseudo-historical dregs, are not different from the proto-Ukrovs in ANYTHING. Right only in one thing - a single people as such does not exist, as long as there are contradictions that divide the people. So we remember the slogan "Communism or Death".

[belovvladimir]

Yes, there’s Liz alone, what’s worth, a monkey with a grenade, bought Boryusik, with the slogan who doesn’t jump that siparatist, it looks like Boryusik rode badly once the monkey with the grenade came to power, but in fact, if they unleash the United States of YaV, then the bunkers will no longer save no one, the living after will envy the dead!

[Two]

The Iron Lady had a lot to learn.

[Vasyan1971]

When representatives of one of the nationalist organizations in 1990 turned to Thatcher with a question about the possible opening of a British embassy in Kyiv, she replied that it was as impossible as opening a British embassy in Quebec or California.

Maybe because at that time England was really afraid of the USSR, and therefore respected?

[Uprun]

And what, something depends on the opinion of the author? So, the voice of one who screams in the desert....

[Munhausen]

In the spring, there was a lot of talk about a possible attempt by the Kyiv regime to detonate a semblance of a dirty bomb in Kharkov. There was even an institute named where such a bomb might have been made. The ostentatious scenario with Butcha has already been run in, most likely the texts have been prepared and it remains for the operators to sit down in their places. With the approach of cold weather and the inflexibility of Russia, the collective West is ready to take any adventures

[koralevviktor]

Then there was the USSR, and this is not modern Russia. They would not wait, they could immediately use force. And the forces of the then Soviets, oh, how big they were.