Published footage of the Antonovsky bridge in Kherson with large holes from the MLRS HIMARS

The Antonovsky automobile bridge in Kherson has not yet been destroyed, despite the ongoing shelling of the Armed Forces of Ukraine over the past few months. Dozens of multiple launch rocket systems inflicted serious damage on it, but failed to destroy it.

About it сообщает Telegram-channel "Operation Z. Military commissars of the Russian Spring".

The channel published footage of the Antonovsky bridge in Kherson with large holes from HIMARS MLRS missiles.

Similar materials were published several times during the past summer. In particular, the video of the object was shown on the Telegram channel of VGTRK reporter Andrey Rudenko.

Of course, some of the missiles, perhaps even a significant part, were intercepted by Russian air defense. But despite this, US-made rockets still reached the object and caused damage to it. Of course, it would be desirable that there were no such arrivals, but so far this has not been achieved. Perhaps this requires some additional means of anti-missile protection, which are probably at the disposal of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, but so far have not been used to protect the Antonovsky Bridge.

On the other hand, despite the damage received, the bridge continues to function, causing a sense of pride in the Soviet builders. Moreover, it was not closed, equipment passes through it, most likely only military equipment.

Comments

[SKVichyakow]

And this can be seen from one of the barges, exposed on the fairway.

[Aerodrome]

but to declare that the "Hymars" were shot down by Chinese PRZK systems, and even better - by "North Korean" ... that was the stink!

[TANKa]

What about the meaning? The more lies on our part will be, the more distrust of the people in power! I would be more pleased with the pictures from their side of the destroyed infrastructure in the trash !!!

[Gorygor]

Quote: TANKa

What about the meaning? The more lies on our part will be, the more distrust of the people in power! I would be more pleased with the pictures from their side of the destroyed infrastructure in the trash !!!

And in response - silence

[Silver99]

Why would enemies give such clear shots in reality? You can photoshop and post these damages, for example, near the Brooklyn Bridge, with a note that this is from the blows of the "Himers", American chip eaters are very impressionable and easily led.

[nik-mazur]

Quote from Silver99

Why would enemies give such clear shots in reality?

Why not? One hole is 150 thousand dollars. The holes in the photo are at least a million dollars worth. How many millions flew into the river or were shot down, one can only guess. As a result, the bridge, at the very least, works, and the great attack on Kherson, for the sake of which this bridge was pierced, was somehow not very successful ...

[Aerodrome]

Quote from: nik-mazur

Silver99
Today, 17: 05
0
Why would enemies give such clear shots in reality?

otherwise, they don’t see ... you are funny.

[poquello]

is this a reprint from a bourgeois resource?

[Old ensign]

The bridge does not function for its intended purpose, it can only be walked on foot. Please note that there are no photographs of what happened under the bridge from explosions, what is the nature of the craters. Just do not write that there is water under the bridge. It is not necessary that they fired only with himars, it is possible and m777.

[mitroha]

Quote: Old ensign

Please note that there are no photographs of what happened under the bridge from explosions, what is the nature of the craters.

Lord, don't look for a black cat in a dark room. The video clearly shows that the damage to the next level of concrete is somewhere between 0.5 - 0.7 meters. What damage is "under the bridge"? In general, in addition to knowing what cement looks like, are you related to construction in general, and the construction of bridges in particular? Under the bridge, I will tell you a secret, water, and soil. And if in the bridge, in the road, and not in the bearing slab and beam, the maximum holes are 0.5 -1.5 meters, then water and soil do not care about them at all.

As long as it's not damaged, all is in vain, and
repaired in days.
I will even tell you more, the supports do not stand at the bottom at all, but are "slightly" lumpy. And bridges are designed with at least a twofold excess of a given load, taking into account resonance.

[dmi.pris1]

By the way, what do THEM have there? Near Belgorod-Dnestrovsk? How is the bridge?

[mitroha]

There is a completely different situation. Because the bridge is made on a different principle. The load-bearing structures there are metal trusses that go on top of the roadway. And there, damage to one of the trusses can be critical for the entire structure, given that the metal of the trusses was in the air all the time, and I don’t know the condition of the metal and how it was serviced all this time ..
But judging by the photo, the main roadbed was also damaged. It's just a little harder to recover. And the calculations of damage to the metal structures of trusses are also more confused, as far as I remember from the institute. On the other hand, it will be difficult to calculate the load of the Nikolaevsky bridge over time due to microcracks in the reinforced concrete structure.

[DIM (a)]

Great answer! Thank you. As long as the supports are intact - the bridge Exists!

[Terenin]

Quote: Old ensign

Just do not write that there is water under the bridge.

Well what are you what water!? Under the bridge - the sky, and above the bridge - a tunnel.

[Viktor29]

Under those large beams that are pierced by the Hymers, there is water. The shore is under the same narrow ones from the support, which is on the left in the photo, only a few spans further from the shelling site.

[Blackmokona]

Quote: Old ensign

The bridge does not function for its intended purpose, it can only be walked on foot. Please note that there are no photographs of what happened under the bridge from explosions, what is the nature of the craters. Just do not write that there is water under the bridge. It is not necessary that they fired only with himars, it is possible and m777.

They perfectly see every hole from American satellites

[Viktor29]

Quote: Old ensign

Please note that there are no photographs of what happened under the bridge from explosions, what is the nature of the craters. Just do not write that there is water under the bridge.

So I won’t write, then they will show the video where this photo came from.

[tralflot1832]

The supply of the Nikolaev direction has already been established, otherwise our Russians have already been demolished from our positions for more than one month. In the Nikolaev direction, our fellows, heroes. They beat the enemy well. Sometimes we see their reports.

[rocket757]

Published footage of the Antonovsky bridge in Kherson with large holes from the MLRS HIMARS

. A serious weapon, some of the hits were heaped ...

[Aerodrome]

Quote: rocket757

Published footage of the Antonovsky bridge in Kherson with large holes from the MLRS HIMARS

. A serious weapon, some of the hits were heaped ...

satellites are working...

[rocket757]

Well, yes, high technology rules until they start knocking everywhere, where necessary.
That is why no one wants to start a global conflict ... without high-tech systems, in simple terms, to fight, many can no longer, do not want to.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: rocket757

. A serious weapon, some of the hits were heaped ...

Yes, they are corrected by GPS. Deviation of the order of a meter. Why the system of "distortion" of the GPS signal does not work, I do not know. Maybe it doesn't work? In Moscow, the navigator is so clearly knocked down, in some places ...

[rocket757]

Guidance only by GPS, an option for the simplest, cheapest systems ... more serious systems, equipped with a complex system ... to counteract it, it’s to start shooting down enemy military satellites ... it hasn’t reached that point yet.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: rocket757

GPS-only guidance, an option for the simplest, cheapest systems

Guidance is inertial, with GPS correction. Correction by satellites is more accurate ... The inertial system gives the more deviation, the farther the target is. So accurately hitting the bridge without a satellite would be impossible.

[rocket757]

Modern control units, with powerful calculators and sensors, are not that big, but you can’t cram it into every ammunition.
No one is hiding about satellites ... but so far, it has not come to the destruction of intelligence and satellite control systems.
But not in vain, minke whales, are trying to include the topic of anti-satellite weapons in negotiations to limit offensive weapons !!!
If satellites are removed from orbit, one, two, high-precision, high-tech equipment will be no more effective than most modern, conventional weapons.
They do not know how to "play" and do not want to.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: rocket757

Modern control units, with powerful calculators and sensors, are not so big, but you can’t stuff it into every ammunition

It's not about the power of computers, but about the accuracy of solid-state gyroscopes and accelerometers. And they still have to withstand the starting acceleration of ammunition. If the RS is still acceptable, then the artillery shell has a couple of thousand g !!! And also rotation with a speed of 12 - 30 thousand revolutions per minute. In short, the stuffing is not simple there.

[Aviator_]

And another rotation with a speed of 12 - 30 thousand revolutions per minute.

Do you seriously think that there are mechanical gyroscopes, as in the middle of the last century? However, not so. There have long been compact laser gyroscopes.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: Aviator_

Do you seriously think that there are mechanical gyroscopes, as in the middle of the last century? However, not so. There have long been compact laser gyroscopes

I know about solid state gyroscopes. I have, you know, attitude to their technology.
But I also know that in terms of accuracy they are still inferior to the ancient mechanical ones. And the features of the application with the accelerations that I wrote about do not make them more accurate. It is to compensate for errors that GPS is required. For correction. Apparently, this is why it is useless to cover the target with electronic warfare devices that shoot down satellite signals. Correction is made all the time, and when the signal is sharply distorted, the correction stops, and the error of the inertial system no longer “runs” so much ... 10 km is not 100

[Aviator_]

Solid-state gyroscopes have no rotating parts at all. Why write about turnovers here?

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: Aviator_

Solid-state gyroscopes have no rotating parts at all. Why write about turnovers here?

I am writing about the revolutions of an artillery shell, not a solid-state gyroscope, in which there are no moving parts. All the electronic filling is inside the projectile with centrifugal acceleration of this magnitude.

[Aviator_]

Then it's clear. But there is a suspicion that the block with electronic filling is in a housing that does not rotate (like a cumulative artillery projectile), thereby removing centrifugal acceleration. Although it is impossible to protect yourself from longitudinal acceleration.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: Aviator_

body that does not rotate (like a cumulative artillery projectile), thereby removing centrifugal acceleration

How about control from the electronics unit? Through the pivot point?
This is not a simple matter. At those speeds.

[rocket757]

Progress does not stand still, the positioning system is completely electronic.
There is a minimum of mechanics, where it is absolutely impossible to do without it.
It is clear that making a smart, high-precision artillery shell flying over a long range is not a trivial task ... well, there is rocket technology that is more suitable for such a task.
Everything has a use...

[volodimer]

Even on our "Flights", in addition to the inertial guidance system, a flight correction based on a photograph of the terrain was introduced. The image from the camera was compared with a photograph of the area stored in memory. Now satellite imagery with accurate georeferencing is not a problem at all.
The camera, image memory and processing engine are geometrically small components. And as for a high-quality image of a stationary object, such as a bridge with coordinates, they don’t give a damn, most likely it was done a long time ago. So highmars can be corrected even without a GPS signal on approach. Further, the distortion of the trajectory is only due to the variability of the wind.
Whether this correction principle is implemented in 155 shells, I don’t know, but in principle it is possible to replace the laser correction sensor with such a system. Of course, taking into account significantly different loads.
That's right, an addition to your discussion.

[Mikulich]

HIMARS mainly uses laser inertial guidance GPS only optional.

[invisible_man]

Investigative actions? I hope they find out who fired. And here the boys are breaking their heads ...

[Viktor29]

All the videos are old, after they were published there were still shellings, and after them there was an official announcement about the closing of the bridge and the cessation of its repair.

[Okakakiev]

What happens if you shoot at the Iskander-M bridge?

[invisible_man]

Approximately the same as when firing "Caliber". The weight of the warhead "Caliber" 3M-14E is smaller, 450 kg versus 480 for the "Iskander". There was little sense from shooting at Ukrainian bridges. More precisely, the damage was rather serious, but the canvas was quickly restored. Something cheaper would be needed to hammer every 2-3 days, dispersing the repairmen.

[Okakakiev]

Himars or tornado with a need in that case

[Aviator_]

Something cheaper would be needed to hammer every 2-3 days, dispersing the repairmen.

It's cheaper to get into the repairmen's trailer, you can use the Lancet.

[invisible_man]

Who will be sitting there in the trailer, waiting for the Lancet? Or Shahid (sorry, Gerani)? :)

[Okakakiev]

Well, after all, Iskander M falls vertically down, and the caliber dives at half an angle. Maybe there is some difference in this sense

[acetophenone]

It would be interesting to try to put a light umbrella over it at a height of 5-10 meters. From easy-to-reset panels. Since you can't intercept. type of corrugated board. Lattice.

[Zefr]

It is better to move 50 meters at night so that the GPS misses

[Old ensign]

Quote: Mitroha

Quote: Old ensign

Please note that there are no photographs of what happened under the bridge from explosions, what is the nature of the craters.

Lord, don't look for a black cat in a dark room. The video clearly shows that the damage to the next level of concrete is somewhere between 0.5 - 0.7 meters. What damage is "under the bridge"? In general, in addition to knowing what cement looks like, are you related to construction in general, and the construction of bridges in particular? Under the bridge, I will tell you a secret, water, and soil. And if in the bridge, in the road, and not in the bearing slab and beam, the maximum holes are 0.5 -1.5 meters, then water and soil do not care about them at all.

As long as it's not damaged, all is in vain, and
repaired in days.
I will even tell you more, the supports do not stand at the bottom at all, but are "slightly" lumpy. And bridges are designed with at least a twofold excess of a given load, taking into account resonance.

Hello. I have nothing to do with construction, you are right. Judging by what you write, you did not understand my comment. It is pointless to repair the bridge under shelling, the Armed Forces of Ukraine in real time guard the beginning of repair work and cover people and equipment, which has already happened more than once on this bridge.

[mitroha]

Quote: Old ensign

You did not understand. It is pointless to repair the bridge under shelling, the Armed Forces of Ukraine in real time guard the beginning of repair work and cover people and equipment, which has already happened more than once on this bridge.

Sorry, didn't see your answer. Well, your first option is extremely different from this one. I completely agree with this, but it is extremely expensive and irrational to hit welders and concrete workers with expensive missiles, especially for military equipment, as a rule, it is enough to throw temporary plates. It is for civil transport that the roadbed must be completely restored.

[Gardamir]

Antonovsky automobile bridge in Kherson has not yet been destroyed

Well, where are those. who said that it is useless to shoot bridges? This is useless in Ukrainian, but it turns out that it is possible for our side.

[Mountain shooter]

Quote: Gardamir

Well, where are those. who said that it is useless to shoot bridges? This is useless in Ukrainian, but it turns out that it is possible for our side

One bridge, having spent hundreds and a half not cheap rockets. There are a dozen and a half such bridges on the territory of dill. The caliber is more powerful than the Chimera. But all the same, a lot of them are needed to destroy bridges across the Dnieper. Or tunnels in the Carpathians. Turn off the light for them - it would be possible. Probably.

[Gorygor]

Quote: Mountain Shooter

Quote: Gardamir

Well, where are those. who said that it is useless to shoot bridges? This is useless in Ukrainian, but it turns out that it is possible for our side

One bridge, having spent hundreds and a half not cheap rockets. There are a dozen and a half such bridges on the territory of dill. The caliber is more powerful than the Chimera. But all the same, a lot of them are needed to destroy bridges across the Dnieper. Or tunnels in the Carpathians. Turn off the light for them - it would be possible. Probably.

Something even the light does not want to turn off. And we pump gas through Ukra. To those who then arm them ... Some kind of solid sur

[Dmitry Karabanov]

One question - why weren't the bridges in Ukraine also destroyed?

[runway-1]

On the other hand, despite the damage received, the bridge continues to function, causing a sense of pride in the Soviet builders. Moreover, it was not closed, equipment passes through it, most likely only military equipment.

Where is this information from? These comments are closer to reality:

Quote: Old ensign

The bridge does not function for its intended purpose, it can only be walked on foot. Please note that there are no photographs of what happened under the bridge from explosions, what is the nature of the craters. Just do not write that there is water under the bridge. It is not necessary that they fired only with himars, it is possible and m777.

Quote: Victor29

All the videos are old, after they were published there were still shellings, and after them there was an official announcement about the closing of the bridge and the cessation of its repair.

[mitroha]

Quote: WFP-1

Where is this information from? These comments are closer to reality:

Apparently, in your personal opinion, otherwise where is there any confirmation, and not just the arrangement "by ranking"

[Fizik13]

So the bridge is still standing, it was made under the USSR!

[Ludmila Myshkina]

At least 6 arrivals in Zaporozhye
t.me/agentgosdepa1
final match.