The representative of the military intelligence of Ukraine warned about the “possible use” of nuclear weapons by Russia against the Armed Forces of Ukraine

118
The representative of the military intelligence of Ukraine warned about the “possible use” of nuclear weapons by Russia against the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Russia prepares to launch a nuclear strike weapons across Ukraine to stop the "heroic offensive" of the Ukrainian army. This statement was made by the representative of the main intelligence department of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Vadym Skibitsky.

After US President Joe Biden from the rostrum of the UN General Assembly accused Russia of the possible use of nuclear weapons, completely misrepresenting the statement of Russian leader Vladimir Putin, Kyiv picked up this accusation after their masters. A warning was made by the representative of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Skibitsky, who has repeatedly voiced delusional accusations against Russia.



Skibitsky, voicing the accusation, at the same time turned to neighboring countries, saying that the use of nuclear weapons would threaten Turkey, Poland, Bulgaria and other European countries. According to a representative of Ukrainian intelligence, Russia is preparing to use tactical nuclear weapons to stop the offensive of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Apparently, Kyiv is convinced that the Russian army has no other ways to defeat the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

Perhaps Russia will use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. They will try to stop our offensive activities and destroy our state. It's a threat to other countries

- he said.

It is worth noting that Vladimir Putin did not say anything about the use of nuclear weapons, it was the West who misinterpreted his words. Meanwhile, since the beginning of the Russian special operation in Ukraine, Russia has already received more than one threat from Western countries. In particular, the use of nuclear weapons by Russia was threatened by French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, Polish Deputy Prime Minister Yaroslav Kaczynski, German Air Force Commander Ingo Gerhartz and the new British Prime Minister Liz Truss.
118 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +37
    22 September 2022 20: 42
    What use of nuclear weapons is there, even if ours are afraid to destroy all thermal power plants, hydroelectric power plants and other so-called critical infrastructure ...
    1. +11
      22 September 2022 21: 02
      Quote: taiga2018
      ours are even afraid to destroy all thermal power plants, hydroelectric power plants and other so-called critical infrastructure ...

      They are not afraid for sure, and there are opportunities. I don’t understand why, I don’t want to think about agreements am
      1. 0
        22 September 2022 21: 21
        There are no agreements, there are grandmas invested by our elite, so they are doing everything so that the troops do not hit the infrastructure.
        1. +6
          22 September 2022 23: 01
          Quote: tatarin1972
          There are no agreements, there are grandmas invested by our elite, so they are doing everything so that the troops do not hit the infrastructure.

          maybe, or maybe the cities are native, they are simply busy with the enemy
        2. +1
          22 September 2022 23: 14
          Although grandfather lied about nuclear weapons, they think correctly in their heads to send mercenaries on a comparable scale, and they consider this the norm, so that the answer to them may not be small.
        3. +4
          23 September 2022 02: 30
          And can you name the names of the Kremlin elite, who allegedly invested in the economy and infrastructure of Ukraine and therefore did not allow strikes, indicating the size of the contributions and the source of information? Because otherwise your statement is, at best, irresponsible chatter, and at worst, slander.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. +3
          22 September 2022 22: 59
          Quote from gunnady
          They are terribly afraid that if they start fighting to the fullest, NATO itself will get into the war

          Well, yes, NATO is not afraid of anything))))))))))))))))
          1. -2
            23 September 2022 17: 25
            Of course they are afraid of something. But judging by the ever-increasing deliveries to Ukraine, fear is becoming less and less every day.
            1. +1
              23 September 2022 18: 06
              Quote from gunnady
              Of course they are afraid of something. But judging by the ever-increasing deliveries to Ukraine, fear is becoming less and less every day.

              on the contrary, they have more and more fear, and the victory that NATO planned in February is farther and farther and the defeat is getting closer
    2. +3
      22 September 2022 23: 17
      The use of nuclear weapons is a double-edged sword. After all, from the border of Ukraine to Kursk, Bryansk, about 100 km, to my Belgorod 35. Point u reaches the first two, and Ukrainian MLRS and Hymers fly over Belgorod. If they bang at the electric substations, then the darkness will be for a long time and without nuclear weapons. Large transformers are not easy to replace. It's good to sit on the couch in Moscow and demand to destroy the infrastructure. And just in case, I bought a gas generator. But it is possible, if it is already included, that the Americans will put missiles at 300 km. Then the Novovoronezh and Rostov NPPs will be targeted. So, the situation is not simple and quite difficult. It is not subject to the mind of couch experts. And nuclear weapons can and will be used, but not soon, and as a last resort.
      1. +1
        22 September 2022 23: 32
        In your place, it’s better to take care of the bunker shelter in general, so that at least the cloud would be enough to sit out. We will not embed, so the Ukrainians themselves will blow up the nuclear power plant. With these checkers will become.
        1. +1
          23 September 2022 00: 17
          If they do, then Russia, in good conscience, can use tactical nuclear weapons in response.
          1. 0
            23 September 2022 00: 57
            But is it worth waiting for if it's inevitable anyway? And in general, why are all the branches of the military fighting and the Strategic Missile Forces are chilling. Let them do the same. I think a lot of people don't mind.
            1. +7
              23 September 2022 02: 19
              The Strategic Missile Forces are of little use in this situation. The Strategic Missile Forces do not have medium-range and shorter-range missiles, they are armed with various types of ICBMs (Topol-M, Yars, Satan, Avangard, in the short term Sarmat) with warheads from 100 klt to megaton class . It is theoretically possible to shoot them in Ukraine at a short range (either on a flat territory or on an ultra-high one), but it’s like shooting sparrows from a cannon, the power of the BB is certainly excessive. ICBMs are sharpened to immediately pulverize the United States and its allies. To solve problems in Ukraine, low-yield nuclear munitions are applicable, these can be artillery shells and mines with SBCh, SBCh OTRK "Isk, Ander" (both winged and quasi-ballistic variants), tactical aviation SBCh (bombs and missiles). Theoretically, it is also possible to work out in Ukraine with aviation missile launchers for long-range aviation or naval navies, but they also have excessive SBC capacities for tactical tasks, Russian people live in eastern and southern Ukraine and we don’t need a new solid Chernobyl there, we’re not fighting for this. Therefore, in this conflict, the use of ICBMs of the Strategic Missile Forces, as well as SLBMs of the Navy, is possible not in Ukraine, but in a critical situation in response to a nuclear strike on the territory or troops of the Russian Federation or in the event of a massive use of conventional weapons by the enemy in the Russian Federation, threatening the very existence of the state.
              1. +3
                23 September 2022 02: 55
                You write correctly about the Strategic Missile Forces, but tactical nuclear weapons are not the new Chernobyl. Of course, there are many victims, but the level of radiation at the site of the explosion becomes relatively safe already on the third day. People live in nuclear test sites. Do not confuse accidents at nuclear power plants with vigorous explosions - physics is completely different!
              2. 0
                23 September 2022 04: 46
                Theoretically, it is also possible to work out in Ukraine with aviation missile launchers for long-range aviation or naval navies, but they also have excessive SBC capacities for tactical tasks, Russian people live in eastern and southern Ukraine and we don’t need a new solid Chernobyl there, we’re not fighting for this.
                Oh, it's a pity that the development of neutron charges was abandoned. How good would it be now. There is Western Ukraine, but there are no Bandera.
                1. +3
                  23 September 2022 06: 08
                  Nobody quit, they are in the nomenclature
              3. +3
                23 September 2022 06: 37
                Firstly, along the extended front line and dispersed enemy positions, the use of tactical nuclear weapons is ineffective, except for the shells of Tulip and Pion. But soil contamination. The most effective is the cities, but ours are there. There is an option - to beat the Westerners (at least one) in the cities and force them to unconditional surrender, this is the case, but snottyness will not allow it. And there is no radiation, because the most effective in terms of damaging factors is an air nuclear explosion, where the radiation is minuscule, in fact, only the materials of the device itself scattered in different directions and that's it. The soil is not infected and does not rise into the atmosphere, except for induced radiation. But I repeat, snot. However, if a high-altitude explosion of a certain power is used, it will irrevocably knock out all the enemy's electronics throughout Ukraine. All Javelins, Stingers, Hymers and S-300s, communications will be covered. Like all cell phones, television, refrigerators, etc. Why do these troglodytes need electricity? The entire power system will shut down. The main thing here is that our troops do not fall under the impact of EMP, but here the nuclear scientists will figure it out. As a result, an air operation with massive, carpet bombing of railway stations, bridges, storage facilities, etc. is carried out with absolute impunity. One "pill" is enough and that's it. The PRC, according to the plan to seize Taiwan, does this, cuts down air defense, and then air supremacy and under its cover a landing operation. The Kuomintang has no chance of holding out. Like the lesson of Ukraine. It is also desirable to "light up" part of Poland. As for Faraday cages, let the Professor tell stories. If you stick out a detector from this cage, there is an antenna, etc., then that's it, the fox put its tail out of the mink ... The fuses do not have time. EMP is always shorter than their operation, etc. Why is the West so afraid of nuclear weapons, because of this. Their advantage and the whole civilization on microchips. A high-altitude nuclear explosion is generally harmless (in terms of radiation and shock wave), a kind of oblique Greta is all environmentally friendly. The truth will cut down not only enemy satellites, but also their own. Nothing, we'll survive.
                1. +1
                  24 September 2022 21: 33
                  A very long time ago I wrote about a high-altitude stratospheric nuclear explosion. Everyone pounced, they say, bloodthirsty and a nuclear war is impossible in principle due to the fact that they say we will become outcasts. Yes, we are already outcasts. And now they began to discuss a nuclear strike, and, the hour is uneven, we will come to it. And a stratospheric explosion is a good warning. And the range of course depends on the power. Not necessarily all over Ukraine.
    3. +1
      23 September 2022 03: 17
      there is a high probability that NOT OURS will use and write off OURS ...
  2. +20
    22 September 2022 20: 43
    Are we waiting for a provocation with a tactical nuclear charge that the "west" uses in Ukraine? And then urine will rush through the pipes to the whole world about how our people used nuclear weapons in Ukraine.
    Boeing, Bucha and so on... If we play cards with cheaters, we will constantly lose.
    1. +7
      22 September 2022 21: 00
      Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
      Are we waiting for a provocation with a tactical nuclear charge that the "west" uses in Ukraine?

      After US President Joe Biden from the rostrum of the UN General Assembly accused Russia of the possible use of nuclear weapons, completely distorting the statement of Russian leader Vladimir Putin, in Kyiv picked up this accusation after their masters.

      Dr. Biden said "to the morgue" - that means to the morgue!
    2. +7
      22 September 2022 21: 30
      Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
      Are we waiting for a provocation with a tactical nuclear charge that the "west" uses in Ukraine?

      I have said here more than once that quite recently there was talk that Ukraine "only non-lethal weapons." Now there will already be MLRS with XNUMX-kilometer missiles, and howitzers, and "Leopards" with some kind of "EF" kami, I have no doubt. It will not be up to the crew - after all, the Americans are now directing "Haymarsy" in Donetsk! And the "Ukrainian" pilots will quickly "learn". I stuck a yellow-blaky chevron - here's an "independent pilot" for you.
      And so I wondered - when will the staffers give them tactical nuclear weapons?
      That they will - I have no doubt. On that and hysteria inflate. They don’t want to be extreme again - for too long they had to excuse themselves from Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

      And here is such a reason -
      "Russia used nuclear weapons in Bucha 2.0!!! AAAAAAAA!!!! Alarm!!! Alarm!!!"
      And then tactical nuclear weapons flooded into Ukraine. And since there is no time to teach the Ukrainians themselves how to handle it, the Americans will hit us with these kiloton missiles.
      They will demolish, to hell, half of Voronezh, and we will promise to "respond with blows to the decision-making centers."
      In Moscow, these promises themselves are not yet funny? I already hate to hear them on the Volga. And it is especially disgusting to hear how in the West these promises of ours are neighing like horses.
      1. +5
        22 September 2022 22: 38
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        and we promise to "respond with blows to decision-making centers"

        Russian man harnesses for a very long time...
        But in this case, the cruiser Aurora will moor at the Big Stone Bridge.
      2. +3
        22 September 2022 23: 07
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        Now there will already be MLRS with XNUMX-kilometer missiles, and howitzers, and "Leopards" with some kind of "EF" kami, I have no doubt. It will not be up to the crew - after all, the Americans are now directing "Haymarsy" in Donetsk! And the "Ukrainian" pilots will quickly "learn". I stuck a yellow-blaky chevron - here's an "independent pilot" for you.

        that's why Lavrov tells the world who is fighting there, so that they won't be surprised later
      3. +1
        23 September 2022 06: 54
        The early warning system will work here and Washington is all ... Regarding Hiroshima, why did they excuse themselves, do they have shame and conscience. It is all of ours who are ashamed and ashamed, but they will have to use nuclear weapons in the form of a high-altitude explosion and there will be peace throughout the world. Dissolve Ukraine, of course. The main thing is not to delay, otherwise mobilization is precisely to avoid the use of nuclear weapons. but it is inevitable. There is enough meat in Poland and Ukraine, but it will not work on an equal footing with the collective West, waiting for their economy to collapse ... a couple of years. This winter, only a terrible crisis, but the collapse will be the next. Is this what we need? Just one high-altitude nuclear explosion over the Lviv region and the world.
        1. -1
          23 September 2022 07: 08
          Quote: hrych
          Just one high-altitude nuclear explosion over the Lviv region and the world.

          Your words would be yes to the Kremlin's ears ...
          Screeching, of course, will be - fellow But it's okay, we'll survive. To any squeal with the patience of an idiot to answer just two words - Hiroshima-Nagasaki.
          1. +1
            23 September 2022 07: 17
            Don't explain anything. Not all of us. Such a solar flare.
        2. 0
          28 September 2022 01: 24
          Hrych, my respect! hi
          I haven’t visited the open spaces of VO for a long time ...
          Quote: hrych
          There is enough meat in Poland and Ukraine, but it will not work on an equal footing with the collective West, waiting for their economy to collapse ... a couple of years. This winter, only a terrible crisis, but the collapse will be the next.

          Why blew up SP-1 and SP-2? With EU, the picture is clear - the patient is more dead than alive. Therefore - only the Marshall Plan-2 and the transfer of money and industry to - the United States - that is, minus a competitor.
          Plus, they removed the foreign trade of the Russian Federation - to carry it by sea - we still do not have a sufficient civilian fleet. And China - a so-so partner - is another monopolist and it is not clear who dictates terms to whom. In addition to the lack of a fleet, we have huge production volumes and do not have sufficient capacities for processing into highly processed products and storage facilities. Therefore, we will apparently be offered some intermediary "independent" of us. Plus, with high gas prices, shale production will flourish again in the United States. 2 years is probably not enough for the complete demise of their economy.
          V.V. Putin did it strategically wisely - he brought the ruble into world currencies and created his own payment system (SBP and the World).
          Plus, huge prospects for the construction of oil and gas and other processing TPK in the Russian Federation. But this time and not one year.
          Another question - when will they arrange a nuclear sabotage on the territory temporarily occupied by Ukrainians?
          PS About the Kharkiv region - I agree. In the best traditions of M.I. Kutuzov.
          1. +1
            28 September 2022 23: 16
            Quote: Stena
            Hrych, my respect!

            hi
            Russia does not need to sell gas at all. Due to the supply of oil and gas to the West, the Russian Federation has already carried out the rearmament of strategic nuclear forces, now by 80%. Deployed a satellite constellation of positioning and guidance, primarily GLONASS, Liana with Tundra, etc. Deployed new early warning systems Voronezh and against low-flying missiles and aircraft ZGRLS Container. Boreas and Ashes in the series. Calibers, Onyxes and Zircons saturate the fleet and mobile complexes. Universal Iskanders with CR and BR, as well as a Dagger. TNW, due to which we are superior in nuclear arsenals to all combined, has reached hypersonic speed, a range of thousands of kilometers, i.e. reached the level of strategic nuclear forces. Well, combat lasers, intercontinental missile launchers and torpedoes are being prepared for adoption. 40 refineries have been built, and most importantly, agricultural holdings have not only fed the country, but also become leading food exporters, leaders in grain, etc. I repeat. All this is due to trade with the West in energy resources. Turning a blind eye to corruption, etc. The main thing was to mislead the enemy. And now we do not need to sell a lot, due to the increase in prices, in particular, for gas now ten times on average. It is enough to sell 10 times less in the EU, but also have loot. Those. have the same money from the West and sell it cheaper to the Chinese. On the whole, the Russian Federation has become self-sufficient. Neither the US, nor the EU, nor China, nor Japan are self-sufficient in terms of energy resources. And energy producers are not self-sufficient in food and industry. And only the Russian Federation is self-sufficient. We don’t consider everyday life, no one will die without iPhones and Mercedes, they travel in domestic and Chinese. Here China is important as a supplier of consumer goods and a substitute for the West. In this war, the main thing is that our economy survived, while theirs cracked. Therefore, they are angry, their strategic nuclear forces are in degradation, tactical nuclear weapons, God forgive me, but our strategic nuclear forces have been updated and tactical nuclear weapons are super. When Poseidon and Petrel step in, that's all. And when the nuclear space station Zeus, etc., receives a powerful radar from a nuclear installation and a quantum emitter, an electromagnetic weapon, etc., begins to maneuver in high orbits, then cartoons about SDI will become a reality. The station will be invulnerable and all-seeing. Now tracking-guidance satellites with an active radar they can only work from low orbits, and from high orbits only with a passive radar. There is not enough energy. They maneuver poorly or in most cases they cannot at all, and even more so to hit targets. Therefore, like this. And why are they hysterical about nuclear weapons, they are afraid that we will use it and the enemy will capitulate unconditionally, but they will not be able to do anything. Is to go to the exchange of blows. And why should they? Suicide is not in their plans. In winter, everything will be decided. Biden will die or completely lie down. Let's see. All according to plan. And now it's time to restore order within the country, because there is no need to pretend anymore. The forecast is favorable or a nuclear apocalypse, which is also fun laughing
    3. +1
      22 September 2022 23: 16
      Quote: IGOR GORDEEV
      Are we waiting for a provocation with a tactical nuclear charge that the "west" uses in Ukraine? And then urine will rush through the pipes to the whole world about how our people used nuclear weapons in Ukraine.
      Boeing, Bucha and so on... If we play cards with cheaters, we will constantly lose.


      And after this, you can actually apply it without fear at all, there will be no other way out. Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not have to be destroyed, but the Americans did it.
      1. -1
        23 September 2022 06: 15
        "After" is always bad. The opponent calculated this move.
        SNF should be used in communications and energy, but not land-based, but sea-based missiles.
        And preferably from the coast of the United States. At the same time, all other combat-ready SSBNs must be in the ocean, outside the zones of action of enemy anti-submarine forces.
        Then, dear partners S.V. Lavrov and V.V. Putin themselves will ask to draw our red lines more clearly.
    4. +1
      23 September 2022 04: 28
      Not exactly... Yes. On the first day, and not only on the first, the whole world will blame Russia. But. Any nuclear charge leaves only its inherent radionuclide trace. It's like fingerprints. The place where the uranium was mined is also revealed. And where and how enriched. Up to the time and place of assembly of the product. So, it is possible to prove sooner or later with such facts in hand. The question is, will they want to listen? And will anyone listen, if God forbid, a general Armageddon will begin!
      1. 0
        24 September 2022 21: 38
        The West will never prove against its own advantage. Example MH17 (downed Boeing in the DPR).
  3. +2
    22 September 2022 20: 43
    Throw vigorous loaves with schnbenka instead of sbch.
    Mow under an accident
  4. +5
    22 September 2022 20: 45
    Ukraine is unlikely to wait for such an "honor". Nuclear strikes are not their level.
    1. -3
      22 September 2022 21: 09
      And what level, when for the 7th month of the operation, our army is forced in some sectors of the front not to even retreat, but to run and abandon equipment and, on most of the front, go on the defensive, somewhere deaf.
      The underestimation of the enemy cost us very dearly, and the American Lend-Lease has not yet fully earned, I personally think that if mobilization does not help and the situation at the front is the same, Putin will not have any other measures such as the use of nuclear weapons, at least a threat to closed / open channels.
      1. +8
        22 September 2022 21: 17
        Quote from: filibuster
        Not until the assessment of the enemy cost us a lot,

        Too many hat throwers divorced, just like in 1941. Live with wolves, howl like wolves. And we are trying to look fluffy, to please everyone. Pity usually brings to the porch.
        1. -1
          22 September 2022 21: 35
          Strelkov, somewhere since the end of March, has been saying where everything is going, but everywhere and in VO they called him an alarmist, an amateur, and even
          1. +3
            22 September 2022 23: 15
            Quote from: filibuster
            Strelkov, somewhere since the end of March, has been saying where everything is going, but everywhere and in VO they called him an alarmist, an amateur, and even

            Girkin didn’t say that, and then you don’t need to push in like “didn’t say but had in mind”, he had a song like a mobilized ukrotolpa would smear everyone, in total - not a ukrotolpa, but a foreign NATO salyanka, and didn’t smear it, but slightly moved it in a weak place so far
            1. -4
              23 September 2022 06: 26
              Enough already to blow in the ears about foreign mercenaries. Yes, they make a significant, but not decisive contribution to the successful offensive of the enemy.
              The ukrotolpa, having thinned out under shelling, become soldiers who, when reformed, undergo ADDITIONAL training under the guidance of their own and imported instructors, are armed with completely modern equipment and become formidable, and most importantly, massive infantry that fights in the virtual network-centric NATO system in this theater. And given the similar reserve of Poland, Slovakia, the Baltic states, Finland, Hungary (they won’t go anywhere), and other Czech-Romanians, the picture is bleak and insoluble without the use of nuclear weapons.
              1. +1
                23 September 2022 18: 14
                Quote: Victor Leningradets
                The ukrotolpa, having thinned out under shelling, become soldiers, who, when reformed, undergo ADDITIONAL training under the guidance of their own and imported instructors, are armed with completely modern equipment and become formidable, and most importantly, mass infantry,

                tell these beautiful tales on the territory of dill, but here the whole TVD is in full view and it is absolutely clear where, why and why
      2. +2
        22 September 2022 21: 59
        I personally think that if mobilization does not help and the situation at the front is the same,
        Then, we will send you to the front, along with your combat sofa.
  5. +5
    22 September 2022 20: 47
    The use of nuclear weapons must be earned or begged for.
  6. +4
    22 September 2022 20: 48
    Go and stir up a provocation yourself decided. Prepare the information ground.
    1. +7
      22 September 2022 21: 11
      A provocation, as you imagine it. An explosion of a nuclear charge on the territory of Ukraine will lead to irreversible consequences for the world. Do you think we and the United States will figure out who blew up? I doubt that in minutes it will be possible to find the author of the explosion.
      1. TIR
        +3
        22 September 2022 21: 22
        It's like you were born yesterday. If before that, without any trial, they accused us of their provocations, then with a nuclear explosion, the ashes will not yet settle, but we will be blamed. Can you imagine what kind of information bomb it will be - Russia launched a nuclear strike! Urgently condemn and impose a complete ban on everything!
        1. +1
          22 September 2022 21: 56
          You didn’t understand my idea. They will no longer be up to the information bomb. The actions of our General Staff. Nuclear weapons were used against us, we don’t care that it flew only to Ukraine. The last call to the sleeping can and flew from our side. The information bomb easily turns into nuclear warheads in Western countries. In the world, a simple scientific rocket cannot be launched without warning, and then an unexpected nuclear explosion.
          1. TIR
            +1
            22 September 2022 22: 31
            Let them not be afraid of nuclear weapons. Because we are sure that we will not use it. We cannot destroy the Ukrainian energy industry, and here the bomb is vigorous. Our determination has already been determined by the agreement on strikes against thermal power plants and hydroelectric power plants. We're already in the action plan in command on their hook
            1. +2
              22 September 2022 23: 33
              And why is Kyiv so excited that there will be a nuclear strike, if not us, then then their partners?
              1. TIR
                +1
                23 September 2022 06: 13
                Much smarter people work there in the information field. They work through any scenarios and prepare for themselves in the information field the same bridgeheads for further maneuvers as on the ground. They never withdraw into themselves and are never silent when there are even problems. After all, if you are silent, and the request for information goes off scale, then people begin to look for information from third-party sources. And the enemy starts to act while you are knocked down. Over time, everything normalizes and the talking heads begin to speak, but people have already turned to third-party sources and in the future, with any strangeness, they will already turn there. This is how they lose the information war. In terms of coverage of the event, the same TG channel Rybar has long outdone the press service of the Kremlin and the Moscow Region. Rybar is actually a pro in the information war and they made their way to the Ukrainian population. Our propagandists urgently need to take skill lessons from them, and not sit around getting huge salaries and work for the enemy
                1. 0
                  23 September 2022 06: 51
                  Well, I am aware of how they work. I constantly read them if there is not enough information in Russia. They just say that everything is fine with them.
                  1. TIR
                    0
                    23 September 2022 07: 30
                    So this is the correct position. Listen to the reports of the summer of 1941. In the same place, they did not lose heart and did not drop the fighting spirit of the population and the army. Yes, they left the cities, but they left
                    "as a result of stubborn resistance, our troops, having inflicted heavy losses on the enemy, retreated to previously prepared defense lines. The enemy is forced to slow down the advance (not the offensive!) To replenish personnel. As a result of the battles, such and such a battalion of such and such a regiment managed to knock out 100500 tanks and self-propelled guns ".

                    Do you understand the difference between this filling and "leveled the front, a gesture of goodwill, redeployment"? There were not just dry numbers, but even in major operations, information was being filled, playing on the feelings of people and forcing them to go forward and beat the enemy
              2. TIR
                +1
                23 September 2022 06: 24
                Let's say the same Zhirinovsky was very competent in terms of information warfare and analysis of events. He immediately interpreted any change in events on the basis of the information he had. So to speak, he was preparing a springboard for himself. And already when the event unfolded into more complex forms, it already had a fulcrum prepared. He could already move forward from her, analyzing new data, drawing conclusions and then voicing probable events. And our main propagandists, who sit on salaries and kickbacks, stupidly swim in the stream of events and say what they see around them. At the same time, Solovyov, for example, political scientists, in essence, are engaged only in explaining events from their point of view. Yes, they are trying to analyze and predict further actions, but this analysis is superficial. They are stupidly discussing a person who goes for a walk. And noticing that a person has taken a step with his left foot, they immediately predict that he will then take a step with his right foot. And where a person goes - they do not see it and do not want to see it. It's hard for them
      2. -3
        22 September 2022 21: 33
        The explosion of a nuclear charge on the territory of Ukraine will lead to irreversible consequences for the world.

        The consequence will be one: they will start to fear us = respect. No one for Ukraine will fit into the exchange of nuclear strikes. Sanctions? So they are all imposed, and if after that the war ends and there is a chance to get Russian gas at the same prices, then the media will quickly switch to monkeypox.
      3. +1
        22 September 2022 21: 37
        Quote: tralflot1832
        A provocation, as you imagine it. An explosion of a nuclear charge on the territory of Ukraine will lead to irreversible consequences for the world.

        Not really, Andrew...
        A tactical charge will explode into a couple of kilotons, of course, they will blame us. Well, five thousand will die - was it once a problem for them? What is for Kyiv, what is for their owners.
        But there is a precedent, you can give Kyiv tactical nuclear weapons (it’s not for nothing that the Americans jumped out of the INF treaty - they were preparing) and here the Russians, get it. Like, they were the first to start. From the unsurpassed masters of provocation and their most worthy students, I easily expect such a turn.

        Quote: tralflot1832
        I doubt that in minutes it will be possible to find the author of the explosion.

        The dust has not yet settled, and we will already be to blame.
        1. +2
          22 September 2022 22: 01
          Blaming the Russian General Staff for a nuclear explosion is fraught with consequences. The General Staff knows that it is not him. He knows that nuclear weapons have been used for the third time in history. He will figure out why it was used, for him the fact that it was used. And he will not wait fourth time..
          1. -3
            22 September 2022 23: 40
            The General Staff knows that it’s not him. He knows that nuclear weapons have been used for the third time in history. He will figure out why it was used, for him the fact that it was used. And he will not wait for the fourth time ..
            Are you hinting that the General Staff will quickly surrender and return the Donbass and the Crimea .. Well, and add a couple more regions to boot?
            1. +5
              22 September 2022 23: 47
              I'm hinting that the General Staff will press a big red button, under which it is written: The whole world is in dust! laughing And what is it, Anka with Lenka and a Frenchman, the second day they cannot get an audience with Lavrov at the UN? So be aware of what's going on.
              1. -1
                23 September 2022 00: 00
                And you look at our news and somehow big doubts creep in that not only they won’t bang, but again they won’t hand over / exchange anything.
                1. +3
                  23 September 2022 00: 29
                  And what is so special about this exchange. You look at ours after captivity and it becomes clear that the exchange is correct.
                  1. -2
                    23 September 2022 01: 00
                    And what, have they already shown our exchanged prisoners? Here they showed the manure workers. And we can say with certainty that they exchanged only for Medvedchuk. So, somehow, after the promises that there will definitely not be a draft, and the captured Nazis are guaranteed to receive their punishment ... The fact that, apart from Medvedchuk and someone else, they have already been called and not to believe the word. And besides words, there is nothing else, and perhaps there never will be.
                    1. +2
                      23 September 2022 01: 30
                      Whoever seeks and wants to seek will find.
                      1. -2
                        23 September 2022 01: 41
                        Nowadays, there is no guarantee that this is not a fake. Otherwise, why are those who changed so hard hiding? And to recruit 55 extras in general is not so difficult, if there was money.
    2. -2
      23 September 2022 03: 24
      I won’t be surprised if 3-5 vigorous loaves were brought in for people. They will be used regardless of the situation at the front. The next step of polygon-U is the nuclear test site. The probability is 100%.
  7. +9
    22 September 2022 20: 49
    It is easy for the Sumerians to live. Speak any nonsense to the whole world, you don’t have to answer for anything.
  8. +3
    22 September 2022 20: 49
    if necessary, I hope they use it smartly and not to the tune of the West, but what you need for yourself!
  9. 0
    22 September 2022 20: 50
    Russia is preparing to launch a nuclear strike on Ukraine to stop the "heroic offensive" of the Ukrainian army. This statement was made by the representative of the main intelligence department of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine Vadym Skibitsky.

    Zaboristy coke was brought to Ukraine!
  10. +1
    22 September 2022 20: 55
    Correctly warned. Such voices from the side of the enemy mean "Hmm... Isn't it time to tie it up? Otherwise, as if something really didn't work out ...". And - a questioning look at the Britons with the Americans. Will they regret...
  11. ASM
    -2
    22 September 2022 21: 01
    Well, the use of vigorous loaves is generally clearly regulated in our country. Or has the doctrine already become toilet paper? Well, everything is according to the published documents. It seems to me personally that, of necessity, the first blow will take place at the decision-making centers, and not at all at some henchmen.
  12. +5
    22 September 2022 21: 09
    Why are they constantly talking about nuclear weapons lately? No matter how the Europeople staged a provocation at the nuclear power plant, they have enough stupidity.
    1. +2
      22 September 2022 21: 31
      Quote: Vladimir M
      No matter how the Europeople staged a provocation at the nuclear power plant, they have enough stupidity.

      From Putin's speech yesterday - "the wind rose can turn in the other direction!" This is a clear warning about the nuclear power plant ... He showed that everything is known about their plans ... "Partners" published maps with the wind rose from the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant. A radioactive cloud covers Zaporozhye, Kherson, Donbass, Crimea, Kuban, Stavropol ... Sochi ....
      1. +3
        22 September 2022 22: 21
        The wind rose from the energy gift is freely available. In March, the southwest wind prevails, and in the rest of the month, anyway, there are days with southwest and west winds.
    2. +1
      22 September 2022 21: 31
      Quote: Vladimir M
      Why are they constantly talking about nuclear weapons lately? No matter how the Europeople staged a provocation at the nuclear power plant, they have enough stupidity.

      Worse is not what they say, but the fact that the Armed Forces of Ukraine have been actively supplying means of protection against radiation since February from the West.
  13. -8
    22 September 2022 21: 10
    Russia is preparing to launch a nuclear strike on Ukraine to stop the "heroic offensive" of the Ukrainian army.
    And the Nazis are unaware that Putin has already used weapons worse than nuclear weapons in the Russian Federation. I'm talking about the exchange of 210 Nazi criminals and mercenaries for 55 of ours. As the bloody clown promised that he would pull it out, he fulfilled this promise. And the promise to arrange a tribunal for Nazi criminals and release them is worse than a nuclear bomb on their own. Although we may not be our own for them. Then I wonder who?
    1. 0
      22 September 2022 21: 13
      Quote: AKuzenka
      I'm talking about the exchange of 210 Nazi criminals and mercenaries for 55 of ours.

      Don't you want to take their place?
      1. +3
        22 September 2022 21: 33
        Quote: Dart2027
        Quote: AKuzenka
        I'm talking about the exchange of 210 Nazi criminals and mercenaries for 55 of ours.

        Don't you want to take their place?

        And he just needs to cut down the shekels.
        1. 0
          23 September 2022 09: 06
          And he just needs to cut down the shekels.
          But as? Just say!
          1. -1
            23 September 2022 09: 28
            Quote: AKuzenka
            And he just needs to cut down the shekels.
            But as? Just say!

            Chu, it’s also a secret to me .... Contact the Mossad ... This is in the event that you have not contacted yet ... hi
            1. 0
              23 September 2022 09: 43
              Chu, also a secret to me .... Contact the Mossad ..
              You, as a knowledgeable person, tell me the phone number with whom to communicate. And then make a protection! Half a liter of good cognac I promise.
              1. -1
                23 September 2022 09: 55
                Quote: AKuzenka
                Chu, also a secret to me .... Contact the Mossad ..
                You, as a knowledgeable person, tell me the phone number with whom to communicate. And then make a protection! Half a liter of good cognac I promise.

                Call Sportloto! tongue
      2. -1
        23 September 2022 09: 05
        Don't you want to take their place?
        Of course not. And why was it necessary to promise a tribunal over them?
        1. 0
          23 September 2022 19: 10
          Quote: AKuzenka
          And why was it necessary to promise a tribunal over them?

          To make partners more accommodating. Ukraine is under the control of the United States, and they absolutely do not care how many natives will be killed. It's another matter if "white people" are shot.
          1. 0
            24 September 2022 13: 42
            To make partners more accommodating. Ukraine is under the control of the United States, and they absolutely do not care how many natives will be killed. It's another matter if "white people" are shot.
            So after all, it was not necessary to announce it loudly. Through the ever-existing silent channels. And that's it
            1. 0
              24 September 2022 15: 25
              Quote: AKuzenka
              So after all, it was not necessary to announce it loudly. Through the ever-existing silent channels.

              May be. But the opposite is also possible, that without that the "partners" might not have believed it.
  14. +3
    22 September 2022 21: 10
    They will hit the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant with HAMERS and that's it. Then they blame Russia. Old scheme. Cooler than Chelnobyl. The affected area is large. But this is just speculation.
    Peace for everyone. ✌️
    1. +1
      22 September 2022 21: 34
      Quote: Fon Elia
      They will hit the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant with HAMERS and that's it. Then they blame Russia. Old scheme. Cooler than Chelnobyl. The affected area is large. But this is just speculation.
      Peace for everyone. ✌️

      From Putin's speech yesterday - "The wind rose can turn in the other direction!" And peace to them!
      1. -2
        22 September 2022 23: 44
        From Putin's speech yesterday - "The wind rose can turn in the other direction!"
        I wonder if he will deploy himself, or will he ask Shoigu?
        1. 0
          23 September 2022 09: 27
          Quote from Rustic
          From Putin's speech yesterday - "The wind rose can turn in the other direction!"
          I wonder if he will deploy himself, or will he ask Shoigu?

          It is best for you to ask Putin about this. hi
  15. +1
    22 September 2022 21: 16
    Well done Ukrainians-parrot the West. And we will show them Kuzma's mother.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. +1
    22 September 2022 21: 27
    So they can apply it or not, you already decide: Zelya - they can’t, Skibitsky - they can ... You decide!
  18. +3
    22 September 2022 21: 54
    Quote: Zoldat_A
    In Moscow, these promises themselves are not yet funny?

    Moscow has to rebuild in a new way. For decades we have been building a system of partnership with the West...
    And it seems to us from below (I suppose to the majority) that this is happening slowly and inefficiently.
    Watching how the "west" acts relatively monolithically in opposing us, having technological, financial and other resources, it becomes somehow scary, but here, as they say, if God is with us, then we will stand and win.
  19. 0
    22 September 2022 22: 06
    Une idée de ce qu'apportaient, avion et hélicoptères qui ont volé vers Odessa aujourd'hui?
    De la matiere première pour une provocation nucléaire?

    Any idea what planes and helicopters they brought with them, which flew to Odessa today?
    Raw materials for nuclear provocation?
  20. -1
    22 September 2022 22: 14
    The possibility and criteria for the use of nuclear weapons should be found in the "Defence Doctrine" of the Russian Federation. And there is no reason to panic. A 100% opportunity to carry out a retaliatory or fully retaliatory strike was provided back in the 70s of the last century.
  21. -2
    22 September 2022 22: 31
    Ukrainians have been dreaming about this since March. Because according to their reports, they have been advancing since March. Apparently the offensive attempts fizzled out
  22. 0
    22 September 2022 22: 33
    In the conventional war, the Russian army found itself
    much weaker than expected in the West.
    Ground troops were unexpectedly weak.
    And the Air Force did not shine.
    Therefore, there were fears about the use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia.
    1. +1
      22 September 2022 23: 40
      Is Israel included in the second half of the world that will be destroyed? And who will ask you!
    2. +2
      23 September 2022 00: 09
      Well, if our military leaders threw a handful into the offensive, then what do you want? Here it is, the army, "in places of permanent deployment", in "winter quarters". So, given the huge superiority in manpower and equipment of the Ukrainian side and that they were advancing on fortified areas, the "limited" contingent proved to be five plus, but at least ten plus three plus. Do not forget to take an amendment to the idea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbfixing the initial stage, the so-called "civilians". That is, massive shelling, "carpet bombing", the destruction of bridges, roads, and other infrastructure was an absolute taboo. It's up to you, of course, to consider anything, up to the fact that the Moon is made of a cheese head, but what is, is. There are no miracles, no matter how much we would like them. Better results, under all these circumstances, would not have been achieved by the strength of any other army in the world. Not the Americans, not the samurai, not the Chinese, not even the Taliban fanatics. There is a limit to human strength, there are objective laws of warfare. It’s also possible, sitting in front of the “box” and sipping ... kvass under the roach, say: “Why didn’t Vasya Pupkin take half a ton? .."
  23. 0
    22 September 2022 22: 35
    Russia does not need to prepare, it is like a pioneer... If necessary, it will apply. Hardly in Ukraine, but its puppeteers have been asking for a long time.
  24. +4
    22 September 2022 22: 45
    Yes, let all the Ukrainian horde be bombed! spit. All Ukrainian cities are not worth the life of one mobilized kid for me.
    1. +2
      23 September 2022 00: 24
      That's right. But we need Stalin. It’s not for our Commander-in-Chief to pull this off. Everything worries him "What will Princess Marya Aleksevna say."
  25. 0
    22 September 2022 22: 48
    I would have slammed tactical nuclear weapons so that others would snicker with fear in their booths
    1. +1
      22 September 2022 23: 28
      This is not ruled out if Russia continues to trample on in the event of a total armament of Ukraine. However, this is an extreme case. The West is still afraid of a nuclear war, no matter what Liz and Biden say. They will never give Ukraine nuclear weapons. Russia, in the event of a nuclear strike, will not distinguish Ukraine from the West and will respond from all trunks.
    2. +1
      23 September 2022 00: 13
      If you really zhahat, then on the head, and not on the well..e. The head is by no means in Kyiv, but "a little" away
  26. +3
    22 September 2022 22: 48
    Apparently the Americans or the Britons decided to arrange a nuclear provocation, since the Ukrainians suffered such a dispersal.
  27. +1
    22 September 2022 22: 58
    And where does Poland have Ya.O? The frogs have a small intestine to launch rockets first. As always, everything will start if they start, the States. Most likely, not as a retired NATO spoke, according to the Black Sea Fleet, but to be sure, in Moscow. What is there to exchange for trifles. Well, in the spirit of Amer, they are not waiting for an answer. And maybe even most likely, they will expose Lisa or "Emanuelle" under attack.
  28. 0
    22 September 2022 22: 59
    So the United States decided to blow up the ZNPP ...
  29. +2
    22 September 2022 23: 25
    In the TG, I read an analysis of the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons with reference to an officer of the Strategic Missile Forces. He claims that it is quite realistic to apply in Ukraine and there will be no nuclear winter. TNW, in his words, was generally invented for an offensive, it must destroy enemy troop concentrations, and then our advancing troops must pass through the zone of application of TNW. And of course not massively die from radiation sickness. So TNW is our real argument, if everything goes badly and the dill tramples on the Crimea or Belgorod. And it is necessary that Kyiv understands this.
  30. +1
    22 September 2022 23: 26
    In the near future, after the referendum, tiao will be applied to the Yavor training ground!
  31. -3
    22 September 2022 23: 36
    Quote: konstantin68
    Quote: taiga2018
    ours are even afraid to destroy all thermal power plants, hydroelectric power plants and other so-called critical infrastructure ...

    They are not afraid for sure, and there are opportunities. I don’t understand why, I don’t want to think about agreements am

    Conducted according to the scenario from Washington.
  32. 0
    23 September 2022 05: 00
    They themselves, out of fear, are confused about who is threatening whom ...
    French Foreign Minister Jean-Yves Le Drian, Polish Deputy Prime Minister Yaroslav Kaczynski, German Air Force Commander Ingo Gerhartz and the new British Prime Minister Liz Truss threatened Russia with the use of nuclear weapons.
  33. 0
    23 September 2022 07: 55
    It is high time to make a "line from the ashes" along the 404-EU border."
  34. 0
    23 September 2022 11: 06
    The Englishwoman is preparing to shit big. She has not yet answered for Paul I.
  35. -1
    23 September 2022 12: 58
    According to the then Minister of Defense of Ukraine, Heletey, Russia had already used nuclear weapons in 2014 and killed over 100 Ukrainians. Although no one knew this, except for the Ukrainians and Poles themselves
  36. +1
    23 September 2022 19: 22
    Quote: futurohunter
    You write correctly about the Strategic Missile Forces, but tactical nuclear weapons are not the new Chernobyl. Of course, there are many victims, but the level of radiation at the site of the explosion becomes relatively safe already on the third day. People live in nuclear test sites. Do not confuse accidents at nuclear power plants with vigorous explosions - physics is completely different!

    Anatoly, don’t you personally want to test these statements on yourself and your loved ones?
  37. 0
    23 September 2022 19: 33
    The meaning of the article is that we are provocatively accused of intending to use nuclear weapons. The meaning of the hysterical comments to it is just the opposite: to immediately use nuclear weapons in Ukraine!
    Truly: "Quos Deus perdere vult dementat prius"...
  38. 0
    24 September 2022 09: 27
    Quote: konstantin68
    Quote: taiga2018
    ours are even afraid to destroy all thermal power plants, hydroelectric power plants and other so-called critical infrastructure ...

    They are not afraid for sure, and there are opportunities. I don’t understand why, I don’t want to think about agreements am

    They are simply trying to play within the framework of civilized relations with the West. But reciprocity will not wait. Gaddafi played-played and played out.
  39. +1
    26 September 2022 13: 10
    How to say.
    "We will not raise the retirement age" - raised
    "We will not announce mobilization" - announced
    "We will not use nuclear weapons" - .....
    Oh, and I'll grab the minuses right now :)