Dieudonné Levo revolvers
who can knot a steel poker.
Arthur Conan Doyle, The Motley Ribbon, 1892
stories about weapons. In all that great variety of revolvers that were produced after the advent of the Colt-Peterson, two directions are quite clearly visible: the production of copies of popular models, both licensed and pirated, and the release of their own designs, at least slightly different from the popular ones.
It was all about the characteristics of the market. Some of the buyers present on it were greedy for everything new, and someone was a “last minute man” who buys after everyone else, but still buys. Someone is a “security guard”, and someone is a “status person”, acting on the principle “This one is more expensive? Give me two”… There are professionals who value reliability, there are “demonstrators” who are fond of handles made of mother-of-pearl and mammoth bone. Someone likes long barrels, someone likes short ones, someone is an athlete shooter, and someone is a killer shooter. And this list can go on and on.
That is why weapons manufacturers, as well as their designers, always have the opportunity to find their niche in the market, occupy it and earn a decent income for some time. And then you have to rebuild, look for something new, and so all your life, which, of course, is very difficult and not everyone can do it.
But on the other hand, thanks to the efforts to occupy this niche, we just have that truly huge number of samples of the most diverse revolvers, which was discussed at the very beginning. One or two improvements - and now you have a new revolver model in your hands, which you can advertise as better and ... sell!
And it was quite possible to improve the design of the revolver. Here, for example, is the Smith and Wesson revolver, which was very perfect in its time, which, as you know, was in service with the Russian Imperial Army for many years, and then the police. A typical revolver with a detachable frame, and with a swivel at the bottom, and a mount at the top of the trigger. The fastening was very simple: two grooved buttons. You click on them, and the frame opens. Seemed to be something that could be improved?
But in 1887, the same company released a five-shot 38-caliber revolver in a hammerless version, that is, completely “self-cocking”. So, it has a different locking system. On the top of the frame were two corrugated movable latches, they moved towards the trunk, and the frame opened. When you press it with the revolver open, you can remove the drum for cleaning.
It is difficult to say how this device was better than the previous one. Unless in the first case it was required to press, and in the second to move, however, in both cases, two fingers were required.
Around the same time, a locking system appeared in Europe, which was worked on by Kuhne, Price, and Francotte, and which was used in many revolvers, including Francotte and Price's revolvers. Here everything was arranged quite differently than in the Americans. The opener for the frame consisted of two vertical l-shaped spring-loaded levers located on the body immediately behind the drum. Their lower ends should be pressed and pressed against the body of the revolver. At the same time, their upper ones diverged to the sides and unlocked the lock of the frame.
Revolvers with a similar frame locking system were produced in the 1890s and calibers from .320 to .577 (from 7,5 to 14,7 mm). But in this case, it was necessary to press simultaneously from both sides, otherwise the frame would not open! It was used on many European revolvers, including the famous "Montenegro". It was very strong, reliable, but ... complicated and, as we might say today, not ergonomic enough.
There was only one way to improve it: of the two levers, leave only one, on the left.
The barrel of this revolver has a length of 152 mm with a total length of 274 mm. It uses Price's locking system, which was first adapted by Francotte. For its operation, this revolver used a long and heavy spring attached to the upper bridge of the frame.
I wanted something more convenient and simple, and this design appeared on the Webley revolvers. It was a U-shaped frame, which was elongated on the left and provided with a key for the thumb of the right hand. The frame on the frame was fixed on the axis and spring-loaded with a flat spring on the right. When the frame lever was pressed “away from you”, the frame moved back and freed the upper part of the frame, which could now freely fold down along with the barrel and drum. This mount has found its application on many revolvers, as it turned out to be both simple and convenient.
Meanwhile, another Belgian gunsmith, Dieudonné Levo, came up with his own system for locking the upper end of the split frame and received a number of patents for his development in 1870, 1871, 1876 and 1877. Interestingly, based on his design, many Liege gunsmiths produced revolvers: G. Mercenier, L. Antzion-Marx, Jean Baptiste Ronge, while others produced his revolvers, adding something from themselves to them, or assembled from finished parts. In particular, this was done by Brandlin and Hughes in England, Bodeo E. Carral in Italy, Ferran and Turdera in Argentina, A. D. Jansen in Brussels, etc. So it would not be an exaggeration to say that weapons created on the basis of these four patents, was an undoubted international success, lasting almost 30 years. So what did he come up with?
Well, then the life cycle of this product ended, and it was replaced by new samples that new people began to buy ...
Information