For the first time since the Second World War, RAF fighters will be located on the territory of civilian airports

33

The NATO countries continue their demonstrative preparations for a possible confrontation with Russia.

From the very beginning of our NWO, the Alliance has been intensively concentrating forces to the eastern borders, ostensibly to protect against the “Russian threat”. Thus, it was previously reported that more than 1600 British military personnel with heavy equipment are currently on the territory of Estonia.



It has now become known that the Royal Air Force of Great Britain will relocate its fighters to civilian airfields. It is worth noting that such maneuvers are performed for the first time since the Second World War.

According to the Daily Express, the aforementioned redeployment is taking place as part of the Agile Combat Employment concept due to increased tensions with Russia.

The program was developed primarily for the Indo-Pacific region, the Middle East and the eastern frontiers of the alliance. Now it is being implemented in Britain itself.

The essence of these maneuvers lies in the fact that the deployment of the United Kingdom's rapid reaction forces on the territory of civilian infrastructure, according to the authors of the project, will avoid their destruction as a result of a likely missile attack on military facilities at the beginning of the conflict. In fact, we are talking about the fact that the British command wants to cover equipment and the military with a civilian shield, using the infrastructure of conventional airports. A similar tactic is being implemented today by the armed forces of Ukraine, which are hiding behind civilians.

It is also worth recalling that earlier British Prime Minister candidate Liz Truss declared her readiness to press the "nuclear button" if necessary without any hesitation.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    33 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +3
      29 August 2022 13: 02
      Heathrow Airport, do we have a 100 megaton warhead? An ordinary NATO attack on Russia is a threat to our statehood. Forces are not comparable. So we equalize right away.
      1. +11
        29 August 2022 13: 04
        Well, "decided" and "decided". This means that the islanders will not have either military or civilian aircraft ...

        These are their problems...
        1. +2
          29 August 2022 13: 11
          The handwriting does not change. What in Ukraine, what in Britain, civilians hide behind. Well, they dispersed the military presence and what will save from all the common nuclear?
          1. +2
            29 August 2022 13: 56
            How quickly they forgot what the army was for
            1. -1
              29 August 2022 18: 57
              For the first time since the Second World War, RAF fighters will be located on the territory of civilian airports

              Here London demonstrates where the wind blows from in Ukraine and whose pointers Kyiv implements in relation to peaceful infrastructure in Ukraine.

              In London, they believed that the Russian Armed Forces would spare the civilian population of Great Britain in the same way as the Russian Armed Forces spare the civilian population in Ukraine.
              Will not!
              Firstly, PROLETARIAN INTERNATIONALISM is finished in the world! And the UK was at the forefront.
              And secondly, Russia does not intend to surrender to the colonial imperialists from Great Britain! Either the complete surrender of Great Britain to Russia, or their islands simply will not exist!
          2. +1
            29 August 2022 14: 23
            They are also apparently heroes, but this menopausal and clinical fool of the brain is not enough to realize that by pressing such a button it turns on the system - 1 island on the planet!
      2. 0
        29 August 2022 13: 14
        Quote: tralflot1832
        NATO attack on Russia is a threat to our statehood

        What is wrong with their brains request they can only think about how to attack, and how to hide from retribution, if they couldn’t hide, then set up their own.
        1. +3
          29 August 2022 13: 19
          We are considering how not a smart increase in rates. Why not shoot the Mace of the Northern Fleet at Kura, Pacific Fleet at Chizha? lolI managed to fix it, T9, landed the Mace for the place of Kura, in Korea. lolDamn, that's how wars start. drinks
          1. 0
            29 August 2022 13: 21
            Quote: tralflot1832
            Why not shoot the Mace of the SF at Korea, and the Pacific Fleet at Chizha

            We must start with the most cunning, that is, with Heathrow wink
            1. 0
              29 August 2022 13: 24
              I agree, are we touching Ireland? laughing
              1. The comment was deleted.
      3. +2
        29 August 2022 13: 30
        Why strike at airports - it is more effective to hit the City, because this is the center of world control of the main power of Great Britain (banks and other places of concentration of "real gentlemen"). Yes
        1. +3
          29 August 2022 13: 33
          There are already 10 warheads in the Voevoda, I think this is a lot for England.
          1. +2
            29 August 2022 13: 42
            I know you read foreign media. Have you read about the canal of England? "The Englishwoman crap" blossomed with new colors - the English Channel was dirtied and, as a result, the beaches of England, Wales and France. "French oysters don't taste as good anymore" lol. environmental terrorists)
            1. 0
              29 August 2022 13: 48
              In 1995, in Freseborough, he fished from a ship for a cat. He caught two cod, both affected. Meat 10 centimeters in diameter, red smelly jelly, was thrown overboard.
        2. avg
          +1
          29 August 2022 13: 56
          Yes, there is no need to bother with targets, there should be a lot of megatons, enough for all sirs. fellow At the same time, test Poseidon, please Uncle Sam. Yes
      4. +3
        29 August 2022 13: 38
        If I remember correctly, 2 "governors" erase the concept of "Great Britain" from the world map. I don't think that the location of anything on this site at this moment is of great importance ...
    2. +1
      29 August 2022 13: 04
      Yes, let them post it. Unless there are clusters of fraternal peoples at these airports. Megatons don't care
    3. GNM
      +2
      29 August 2022 13: 05
      ... Now it has become known that the Royal Air Force of Great Britain will relocate its fighters to civilian airfields. It is worth noting that such maneuvers are performed for the first time since the Second World War ...

      During the "Battle of Britain" in 1940, this was justified (by the way, when I studied this battle, I began to respect the British) in all other cases it is just the usual vile British essence, which they taught the dill.
      1. -1
        29 August 2022 13: 14
        (by the way, when I studied this battle, I respected the British)

        30000 British sorties for 800 German? Yes, "respect". And the main word is "battle".
        Another childish fuss of two German divisions near El Alamein next to Stalingrad to put ...
        I "respected" only British diplomats. Well, it’s necessary to make porridge so cleverly and get rid of a real war.
    4. 0
      29 August 2022 13: 11
      the deployment of the United Kingdom's rapid reaction forces on the territory of civilian infrastructure, according to the authors of the project, will avoid their destruction as a result of a likely missile attack on military facilities at the beginning of the conflict. In fact, we are talking about the fact that the British command wants to cover equipment and the military with a civilian shield, using the infrastructure of conventional airports.

      It turns out that it is not Ukraine that is learning to hide behind civilians from terrorists. It is the terrorists, together with Ukraine, who are learning this tactic from the natives.

      As they say, "Who Made Who?"
    5. +4
      29 August 2022 13: 12
      The NATO countries continue their demonstrative preparations for a possible confrontation with Russia.
      Are you mentally prepared to fight? Truss' chest thumping speaks so far only of his desire to become prime minister.
      1. 0
        29 August 2022 13: 21
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Truss' chest thumping speaks so far only of his desire to become prime minister.

        Well, it (chest pounding) is necessary only for the sake of Truss's premier ambitions.
    6. +5
      29 August 2022 13: 14
      And who said that ours would not hit civilian targets in the UK, just as they don’t hit targets in the former Ukraine now?
      Awww, small-shaven, Ukrainians are kindred to us - you are not :)
    7. +9
      29 August 2022 13: 15
      I do not think that, in the event of a conflict, Russia will worry about the infrastructure of small Britain. Yes
      1. 0
        29 August 2022 13: 38
        Don't touch Ullapool, we'll go there on vacation. drinks
    8. +1
      29 August 2022 13: 23
      Question: What remains for the outgoing Johnson and the incoming stupid Truss against the backdrop of the economic crisis, wild energy and fuel prices, inflation mess, wild food prices, lack of water as a resource ... can we continue further ....?
      Assumption: To continue to further whip up hysteria and militaristic moods in society so that the British society, which has always hated Russians since ancient times, would rally even more strongly around such a failed government in an effort to please the United States - to support the clown in Ukraine with everything they can.
      Already, military aircraft are being deployed at civilian airfields. Then they will begin to put MANPADS positions on the roofs of skyscrapers ...
      In the USA, Avengers again flooded the roofs of Fashington (Russians living there write in TG). it’s just that they gathered to shoot them down at such low altitudes - it’s unclear.
      If he does arrive, then obviously the Avengers cannot shoot him down.
    9. 0
      29 August 2022 13: 24
      Hmm. "Ay Moska, to know she is strong, if she barks at an elephant." I can’t imagine what will remain of this petty Britain after nuclear strikes. With their average population density of 275 people per 1 km2 (this is over the entire area, in cities the density is up to 4000). In the Russian Federation, somewhere around 8,5 people per 1 km2. And no matter what anyone writes and says, in the Russian Federation there is where to evacuate, there will be large territories not affected by nuclear weapons. Small-shaven only to Poseidon or on skiffs to paddling pools.
    10. +1
      29 August 2022 14: 02
      Yes, and do not care, in the case of a batch, ours are not there and their citizens and objects do not give a damn.
    11. +1
      29 August 2022 14: 16
      Silly small-shaven, well, what difference does it make to the Sarmatian / Voyevoda, where your planes are. Everything is mixed with the earth.
    12. -1
      29 August 2022 14: 38
      All this makes sense only in two cases. Either the war, or the Estonian warehouses will be thoroughly gutted for Ukraine.
    13. -1
      29 August 2022 14: 43
      Will not help. In the Donbass and Ukraine, our people, with the aggression of Great Britain against Russia, "the poles change" - the protection of Russian citizens will become a priority!
    14. -1
      29 August 2022 14: 44
      Yeah. Blood is not water, it’s not like they can’t get drunk. After the start of the special operation, the truth flooded, but the common people cannot understand anything.
    15. -1
      29 August 2022 16: 03
      In the event of a global conflict, vigorous loaves will never know what airfield and under what sauce military aircraft, tanks or spaceships stand there. It’s so cute to hide behind civilians. Ukrainians are not the first to come up with the idea of ​​hiding behind civilians. , but also the first concentration camps. In general, more napalm is needed.
    16. -1
      29 August 2022 17: 06
      It looks like the process has begun ... I understand that our combat readiness has already been increased by ++, but now you can’t click with your beak at all.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"