You guys are good, but I won't give you a plane

75

The situation regarding the re-equipment of the Ukrainian Air Force with American aircraft has frankly reached a dead end. More precisely, she was practically kicked there. The Americans are still considering the possibility of supplying aircraft to Ukraine and training pilots, but a decision cannot be made. In principle, everything is quite simple: either give the planes or not. But there are nuances...

What the US military is relatively willing to share is the A-10 Thunderbolt 2 attack aircraft, aka Warthogs.



You guys are good, but I won't give you a plane

And the Ukrainians categorically kick back from this junk and want at least the F-16.


So the question is really under consideration, there is a game like "who is greedier." The Americans are well aware of the degree of risk, it is one thing to give old attack aircraft for destruction to the Russian Aerospace Forces and Air Defense, another thing is aircraft that will be useful to themselves.

The battle unleashed at the negotiating table is moderated by Colin Kahl, Deputy Secretary of Defense of the United States.


During the next briefing, he announced the following: the US military department does not renounce its promise to supply aircraft to Ukraine. It's just that a fundamental decision has not yet been made on which aircraft and in what form will be delivered.

How can one not recall Vereshchagin from the "White Sun of the Desert": "You guys are good, but I won't give you a machine gun."


Kal explains quite well why things happen the way they do. The United States is trying to supply Ukraine with such weapons systems that Ukraine can maintain and maintain in combat readiness on its own..

This is very, very logical, in one of my articles on this topic, I raised the question exactly like this: who will maintain and repair American aircraft? It is clear that not Ukrainian technicians, the training of engineering and technical personnel will take more than one month. And American technical specialists, having read and listened to the mercenaries who fought in Ukraine, I doubt that they will line up to conclude contracts to work for the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

And without them, Ukraine 100% will not be able to ensure the combat capability of American aircraft.

As for the future possible deliveries of fourth generation fighters, even if we decided to transfer them now, it would take years to deliver

- Kal.

Logically. Deputy Minister of Rights: the creation of a material and technical operational base is not a matter of one month. Personnel, warehouses, spare parts, equipment for repair and operation; - everything will have to be collected in Europe (for example) and delivered to Ukraine. Plus training of engineering and technical personnel.

And in Ukraine, the army leadership for some reason adheres to a different point of view. It expects that in the future it will be able to radically upgrade its air force with American assistance in the form of deliveries of combat aircraft.

I am sure that the day will come when we will be able to say that the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has become not only one of the most combat-ready in the world, but also one of the most modern and technologically advanced.

This was issued by the famous stand-up comedian Vladimir Zelensky. Especially the passage about the modern and technologically advanced Air Force is wonderful, because how to combine begging and outright extortion with these terms?

Of course, if we are talking about simply begging for modern and technologically advanced aircraft from others, then yes, this is quite possible. Another thing is impossible: to present a line of people wishing to do good to Ukraine at their own expense.

In general, the behavior of the Ukrainian side is rather stupid. One gets the impression that they simply do not realize how long it will take to properly retrain the flight and technical staff for American aircraft.

But they require. How all this will look, the United States understands. Untrained technicians will somehow prepare the planes, which will be boarded by slightly trained pilots. What chances they will have against Russian opponents is clear. Zero. However, the sitcom continues, and Ukraine still requires the F-16.

But, as honestly (for once) the same Zelensky admitted, so far they have not given a single one.

And they won't.

Aircraft, spare parts, materials, ammunition - this is money. Just take and throw them away, using them as targets for Russian air defense systems or fighters - no, well, everything is not so bad in the USA, not only Bidens rule there, there are tough pragmatists who take a sober look at the world. And they understand that the plane that ended up in Ukraine is, consider it, a lost plane.

Therefore, it is one thing to give away the old and actually decommissioned A-10s, and quite another completely combat-ready F-16s. Which, by the way, you can just sell, that's something, and Sokolov will be bought.


We often ridicule the actions of the US military, but this time they are behaving very reasonably. The organization of a complex and expensive infrastructure for servicing American aircraft is not one year. And do not forget that Ukraine is a country that is conducting hostilities, that is, all processes will be complicated by this.

It is not enough for pilots to be trained to fly the Falcons; they need to be taught the tactics of using these particular aircraft so that they know the strengths and weaknesses of the machines. Well, or just immediately lay down big losses and expect demands for the supply of new aircraft to replace the lost ones. Moreover, the losses will not necessarily be combat. Definitely, a certain number of machines will be ruined by half-educated pilots and technicians due to operational errors.

But in general, you should not get too hung up on this topic. The farther, the less chance Ukrainian pilots have to sit at the controls of the F-16. The idea itself is not new, and the epic has been going on for more than a year, so the appearance of American aircraft is not only unlikely, but the possibility is catastrophically low.

If you remember that it all started not yesterday, but three or four years ago. I didn’t dig very detailed, but here is one of the first statements of a person holding a serious position in the NATO structure - this is September 2019. General Jeffrey Harrigian, commander of all US Air Forces in Europe and Africa, said that it is necessary to consider the possibility of supplying Ukraine with American military equipment, meaning, of course, aircraft.


Harrigyan motivated this by the possibility of acquiring a large potential of the Ukrainian Air Force, which could operate jointly with the US Air Force.

Sorry, but in 2019 the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine was not in such a ... chipped state as it is today.

Therefore, it is not at all surprising that no real progress on this issue has occurred, although the abandonment of Harrigyan caused a great resonance.

In 2020, the command of the Ukrainian Air Force developed a development plan aviation until 2035. According to the document, during this period, Kyiv should decommission all standing Soviet aircraft, replacing them with one type of multi-purpose aircraft, preferably of the 4 ++ generation. Naturally, foreign production.

The appetites of the Ukrainian Air Force Command extended to any decent Western-made aircraft, from the American F-16 Block 70/72 to the Swedish Saab JAS-39E / F "Gripen", although no one was against the Rafales. The Ukrainian military believed that the country's Air Force needed from 72 to 108 aircraft, for which they planned to spend 200 billion hryvnias. THOSE hryvnia, which in the dollar was another 22-23. That is, 8,7 billion dollars.


The figure is weighty and pleasant for those who sell weapon for money. But we understand that these are Ukrainians, which means that they did not have a penny. Therefore, either a loan, or "for so." How else to explain the complete absence of those who want to sell aircraft? To the Indians, what ungodly buyers, every time the line is lined up from Mumbai to Delhi, and here - silence.

And then the SVO broke out and somehow the plans for rearmament for money were expectedly hushed up, but screams began that Ukraine simply needed new modern aircraft. And the requests and demands began to sound louder, as the remnants of the Ukrainian Air Force were knocked out by all available means, of which the Russian army had more than enough.


On March 24, Pan Zelensky, at a video conference of the NATO summit, was very loudly indignant at the fact that the bloc had thousands of aircraft at its disposal, but they were not given a single one. Alas, all the indignations did not irritate the souls of those who will have to make decisions.

NATO air forces limited themselves to transferring to the Ukrainian Air Force a certain number of HARM air-launched anti-radar missiles, adapting them for use from Soviet aircraft. And that's all for now.

As for the A-10, everything is not clear with him. No decision has been made on the transfer, but a number of Ukrainian pilots are trained to fly this aircraft in simulators. While there is information only about the pilots, there is no information about engineers and technicians.

So, the pilots are training, but the official authorities of Ukraine refuse attack aircraft with all their might and continue to insist on the transfer of the F-16 to Ukraine. This is logical, because the A-10 is fodder for both Russian fighters and air defense. The sad experience of the loss of Su-25 attack aircraft by the Ukrainian side is the best confirmation of this. A-10 is no better in this regard.

But the main thing is that in the package of military assistance to Ukraine, which was approved by the US military department in August this year, there is not a word about aircraft.

This, in my opinion, is the best answer to the question "When Ukraine will receive planes from the United States." Not now, not in the near future. Maybe in the next package. If he will. Perhaps never.

As the conversation about the planes will (and it will) drag on, the cries from the Ukrainian side will intensify. This is understandable, because there was not a single plant for the production of combat aircraft on the territory of Ukraine. In this regard, the Ukrainians were very unlucky, they really fell into direct dependence on Russia. Since now the MiGs and Su are unattainable, and what is collected in the barrels of the countries of the former socialist camp is in the same way in need of repairs that the Ukrainian industry is not able to provide, the Ukrainian military department has only one way out: to stand with an outstretched cap, waiting for that that overseas will have mercy and aircraft will be allocated.


They are also good. Fighters for democracy and the shield of Europe...

But as practice shows, even good guys do not always get machine guns. And even more so the planes. This is our harsh reality, which is often very cruel even to the collections of overseas-style democracy.
75 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. GURAN1
    +14
    31 August 2022 05: 17
    It's not over yet .. If we tighten the CBO indecently, F16 will also appear
    1. +1
      2 September 2022 16: 18
      GURAN1 (Sergey), August 31, 2022 05:17, NEW - "... It's not evening yet .. If we tighten the CBO indecently, F16 will also appear ..."

      You are unfortunately right. hi The probability is high. 7.08.2022/XNUMX/XNUMX, on the program with Solovyov, Semyon Bagdasarov .. said that the United States can "attract" at least military specialists from Central Asia, it is not in vain that the peace-loving "uncle Sam" stirs up "with our" partners "from the CSTO. For example, for US citizenship trained pilots with equipment "abandoned" by the United States in Afghanistan or. And there, not only those who remained in Afghanistan, but also "refugees" in the Central Asian republics, with our partners, want to. And they are enough..
      ".INTERESTING - belay
      TASS: US prepares former pilots from Afghanistan for transfer to Ukraine
      Marina Krizhanovskaya
      05:15 29.08.2022, https://tvzvezda.ru/news/202282953-m4BUU.html
      Training begins in California, it involves pilots who escaped in August 2021 from Afghanistan to the United States. According to media reports, the US defense department - the Pentagon - has begun training former pilots from Afghanistan. It is noted that subsequently they will be transferred through Poland to Ukraine.
      Currently, the Pentagon is recruiting Afghan pilots for combat training aircraft. It is reported by TASS with reference to a military-diplomatic source.
  2. +3
    31 August 2022 05: 31
    yeah, A10 air junk with Mauritius laser-guided cassette free-falling air-to-air bombs + all this is a container to highlight or reb, we have a Su34 that can
    1. +2
      31 August 2022 05: 51
      All of the above can be attached to Stratofortres, the only question is whether it will take all this pleasure to the area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbapplication.))
    2. +16
      31 August 2022 05: 52
      Quote: Charik
      A10 junk

      IMHO .. It's good that Ze and the company kick back from the A-10. They would now take everything they give .. while they give -))
      And -10 in capable hands och. an unpleasant thing for all ground (art. Tanks and any equipment, and infantry .. covered and open).
      1. -2
        31 August 2022 06: 05
        Quote: ammunition
        And -10 in capable hands och. an unpleasant thing for all ground (art. Tanks and any equipment, and infantry .. covered and open
        Whatever you give to Saloreikha - about ... they lose or break it!
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. +4
            31 August 2022 06: 25
            Quote: ammunition
            And Mayakovsky lost.
            I think it's a fairy tale.
            Of course, I’m not a “Classic” and I don’t even pull a tenth of his partner, but a beginner can beat the master only if the master is drunk in the boobs!
            1. +2
              31 August 2022 06: 48
              Quote: Victor_B
              I think it's a fairy tale.

              No, not a fairy tale.
              -))) for example - I know from my own experience (as an old experienced chess player), one has only to treat with disdain an obviously weak opponent .. like the 3rd category .. as the probability of miracles (and the probability of losing) increases a hundredfold.
              And in the war .. I also know .. you just have to count yourself .. and don’t count the enemy - write wasted. The best state is full concentration on both extremely strong opponent. Something like an internal "horror" that the enemy is at the limit of your own strength and the strength of your company.
            2. 0
              1 September 2022 06: 40
              Quote: Victor_B
              A beginner can beat a master only if the master is drunk in the boobs!


              In the old circus, the strongest wrestler of the wrestling group imitated the weakest in public training, rehearsals and performances. In those days, wrestling lovers always came out of the audience to the carpet, who could not be refused because the public considered this unsportsmanlike behavior, but who needed to be reined in time - so that the wrestlers would not have unnecessary injuries and not miss the earnings season. Therefore, they offered him to compete with just such a specialized "weakling" wrestler. At the same time, recruiting for work in the circus wrestling group took place - it was necessary to pass this "wrestling control" at its entrance.
      2. +1
        31 August 2022 06: 35
        It is in SKILL!!! But this does not apply to the Chubatorians. And even with the complete dominance of Russia in the sky, the chances of a successful flight from a warthog are minimal.
        1. +5
          31 August 2022 06: 42
          Quote from mad big
          the chances of a successful flight in a warthog are minimal.
          The armored attack aircraft brother of the Su-25, and the Su-34 (to a lesser extent), work under the same conditions, which means we can measure the losses.
          But specifically in the NWO zone of life, he, like the Ukrovsky Su-25 (which all do not end there).
      3. +10
        31 August 2022 06: 49
        A -10 in capable hands
        only in the absence of air defense.
        In the current situation in Ukraine, it is disposable. They are asking not for strike aircraft, but for fighters, moreover, for operations in the depths of the territory. Because near the front, they won’t live long either. They are not given. Because the effectiveness of the same F-16 without the corresponding massive support for the accompanying infrastructure will be none. The reputation of the device will fall catastrophically. And they still have to be sold to different Papuans as they are decommissioned and replaced. Here, no profit from Ukraine can make up for the loss. Is it necessary?
      4. +3
        31 August 2022 07: 37
        Quote: ammunition
        And -10 in capable hands och. unpleasant thing

        And it will also seed Ukraine with depleted uranium, which is used to load its gun. Even if the regime changes, people will live there, and uranium tends to provoke oncology. In Iraq, where these shells were used both in 1991 and 2002, it is already noticeable. But it is one thing to apply it to a hostile country across the ocean, on the population of which, in general, to put the device, and quite another on its own territory.
      5. +1
        31 August 2022 11: 06
        A very malicious eraplan. Only one gun is a very unpleasant thing.
      6. +3
        31 August 2022 14: 49
        Quote: ammunition
        Quote: Charik
        A10 junk
        And -10 in capable hands och. unpleasant thing.
        A-10 machine is not new, but very worthy. They will never be seen: the Americans themselves do not know what to replace them with; retraining only on the Davis-Monthan home base is not very easy: there are no sparks, the initial requirements are very high. Well, there is no experience of retraining foreigners on Thunderbolt II, from the word at all.
      7. +2
        31 August 2022 15: 23
        to me!! me a warthog!! dream of a lifetime!!
      8. +1
        1 September 2022 02: 07
        And there is someone to fly? As far as I heard, they are seriously considering the possibility of attracting pilots from the Afghan Air Force. The pilots were shot down along with the planes.
    3. +4
      31 August 2022 06: 47
      A-10 is a good car, expensive, but tenacious. That's just it is effective in the absence of no matter how significant air defense. Grenada, Iraq, Afghanistan and even, unfortunately, Yugoslavia. And with complete air supremacy, and not when your own fighters appear in the sky as often as Thor in a bronze chariot, with two goats and Mjolnir. Otherwise, the old warthog in the sky will live as long as a spittle lives on a hot stove.
      1. -4
        31 August 2022 07: 10
        Quote: Lester7777
        That's just it is effective in the absence of no matter how significant air defense.

        Mi-5 is 10-24 times more efficient.
        Speed, weapons, actions from the "ambush" on the tip of all intelligence data, catapult! ( the pilot does not die as on the Mi - 24 ) .
    4. +1
      31 August 2022 09: 12
      Without a safe airfield, any aircraft is useless! There are no safe airfields on the territory of Ukraine, as soon as on which one a sane number of aircraft appears, it will inevitably be destroyed .. And if you consider that for effective databases you need a whole support system from the ground, the whole idea with aviation in Ukraine becomes meaningless and the west is understands.
    5. +3
      31 August 2022 14: 13
      Quote: Charik
      yeah, A10 air junk with Mauritius laser-guided cassette free-falling air-to-air bombs + all this is a container to highlight or reb, we have a Su34 that can
      A10 is an armored and survivable aircraft capable of using high-precision weapons. There can be many problems for us. And the fact that the resource is small is not critical: it will be enough for 3 flights - and okay, there will not be much more chances to live.
      1. +4
        31 August 2022 15: 25
        and missiles from over the horizon are so good!
      2. +1
        31 August 2022 19: 03
        Quote: bk0010
        A10 is an armored and survivable aircraft capable of using high-precision weapons. There can be many problems for us. And the fact that the resource is small is not critical: it will be enough for 3 flights - and okay, there will not be much more chances to live.

        The Su-25 is also armored and survivable, and can also shoot with precision. But judging by the video from the scene, he now flies very low and sends packages of NURs along a hinged trajectory somewhere into the distance, so as not to be substituted once again. This is despite the fact that the air defense of Khinzirostan is several times weaker than that of the RF Armed Forces.
        1. +1
          31 August 2022 19: 26
          Quote: Obliterator
          But judging by the video from the scene, he now flies very low and sends packages of NURs along a hinged trajectory somewhere into the distance, so as not to be substituted once again.
          Here the keywords are "flies" and "sends". Imagine that instead of NURs, GPS missiles will launch from a roll-up. Unpleasant? Most likely.
          1. 0
            31 August 2022 19: 52
            Quote: bk0010
            Here the keywords are "flies" and "sends". Imagine that instead of NURs, GPS missiles will launch from a roll-up. Unpleasant? Most likely.

            There are no GPS missiles on the A-10.
  3. -1
    31 August 2022 05: 33
    what kind of scarecrow is the deputy minobr of the usa - some kind of freak like a homosexual in the minatom yusa or like a lesbian in the press service - in kind ward number 6
    1. +2
      31 August 2022 07: 39
      Quote: Charik
      what kind of scarecrow is the deputy minobr of the usa - some kind of freak like a homosexual in the minatom yusa or like a lesbian in the press service - in kind ward number 6

      Democrats, sir.
      1. -1
        31 August 2022 09: 58
        With Armenian roots, apparently ...
  4. +3
    31 August 2022 05: 39
    The Ukronazis are wonderful at milking both the US and the EU, pumping dollars, euros, weapons and mercenaries out of them ... a real black hole ... such a national trait and fun they have ... getting everything for free ... and then everything is safely squandered.
    1. +3
      31 August 2022 08: 24
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      the kronats are remarkably milking both the USA and the EU, pumping dollars out of them,

      they do not milk - but get into debt ... which - Who will give back ???
      1. +1
        31 August 2022 14: 44
        Already paid lol
    2. -2
      31 August 2022 11: 07
      Give a foolish man a glass toy...
  5. +6
    31 August 2022 05: 51
    That's how planes get shot down. They crash and they crash! So why deliver then?
    Sorry for the offtopic, but GORBACHEV IS DEAD! And he was finally shot down!
    1. +3
      31 August 2022 06: 01
      it would be better if Chubais was humpbacked first, and so the old one WAS about to move his hooves
      1. 0
        31 August 2022 16: 06
        Quote: Charik
        it would be better if Chubais was humpbacked first, and so the old one WAS about to move his hooves

        Of course, I am by no means a fan of this Trotskyist bastard, but he was not the only one who made our economy.
    2. +6
      31 August 2022 06: 01
      GORBACHEV DIED

      "About the dead, or good, or nothing ... but the truth" (C) Chilo
      And there is so much truth that you can’t take away (
    3. -1
      31 August 2022 16: 05
      Quote: Egoza
      That's how planes get shot down. They crash and they crash! So why deliver then?
      Sorry for the offtopic, but GORBACHEV IS DEAD! And he was finally shot down!

      Yes, this is very good news.
  6. +2
    31 August 2022 05: 57
    When they are given planes, but never. And if the pilots in the foreseeable future can still be somehow prepared, although this is somewhat fantastic, then there is definitely no base, they will be ground very quickly, and there will really be problems with the ITP. There is only one way out, somewhere abroad in Poland, but then Poland is a legitimate target and NATO is drawn in to its very ears.
    But here for the Ukrainian @ in there is a good opportunity to pee...
    Why did we lose?
    Airplanes were not given to us,
    We were not given leopards,
    Only old firecrackers.
  7. +1
    31 August 2022 06: 04
    Is Harrigian an American?
  8. +3
    31 August 2022 06: 08
    Gorbachev is dead.
  9. +3
    31 August 2022 06: 11
    Pah-pah-pah, so as not to jinx it ...
    Like Gorbach died ...
  10. 0
    31 August 2022 07: 15
    In general, the behavior of the Ukrainian side is rather stupid. One gets the impression that they simply do not realize how long it will take to properly retrain the flight and technical staff for American aircraft.
    The flight and technical personnel of the Air Force of Ukraine are already undergoing training on the F-16 in Poland. The leadership of the VVSU and their American curators are well aware that the stocks of Soviet equipment are not endless.
  11. +3
    31 August 2022 09: 30
    It is generally surprising to me why, knowing about the war since 2014, the Ukrainian Air Force did not intensively pump up F16? By the war of 2022, there would already be infrastructure .... a bunch of interesting aviation weapons for F16 (for example, KR with a range of 900 km), compatibility with AWACS and tankers, and an inexhaustible supply of pilots for F16, infrastructure nearby in Poland, Romania, Bulgaria .. ..A bunch of spare planes ...
    1. PPD
      0
      31 August 2022 10: 08
      The answer, most likely, lies on the surface - they did not know anything.
      They just shook the air.
      But there was no logic there.
      Heads too.
      As a result of the coup, the country split, so instead of sending tanks to the Donbas and mockingly declaring that the air conditioner exploded just to talk? Refused right away fool Lavrov S.B. appreciated it very well.
      What kind of strategic and tactical assessment and planning can be expected from a person who said, "we must give .... any promises, and then we will ...."
      What are the planning and calculation of actions and actions.
      Just stupid chatter.
      1. +1
        31 August 2022 10: 13
        At least since 2018-2019, they themselves have voiced that the war with the Russian Federation will be in 22-23 years. And we see now that they have done a great job.
        1. PPD
          0
          31 August 2022 10: 26
          If you really believe everything they say.... wassat
          I say there is no head.
          Only emotions.
          They were preparing for the war with the Donbass, which they voiced. And Russia was dragged in for a red word.
          It can be seen what a shock was when the SVO began.
    2. +1
      31 August 2022 10: 23
      Quote: Zaurbek
      It is generally surprising to me why, knowing about the war since 2014, the Ukrainian Air Force did not intensively pump up F16?

      Apparently because, until recently, NATO did not care about Ukraine? No, won't you get an answer?
      1. 0
        31 August 2022 12: 13
        Unlike the Russian Federation ... capitalists invest money and control further actions ....
        If we compare our investments in Ukraine and American ones (together with Europe), then they invested incomparably less and got everything they wanted - in fact, a civil war on the territory of the USSR with a huge number of people killed (and Russians on both sides for them) and isolation from the EU energy and us from EU technologies....
        1. -1
          31 August 2022 16: 10
          What technologies are in the EU? All technologies are long gone. First of all, they ruined the EU economy. We're just a by-product here. True, they miscalculated with us.
        2. 0
          31 August 2022 18: 10
          Yes you? But according to the zomboyaschik, they assure us that we do not need any EU technologies and have everything of our own and as much as you want. Or lie?
          1. 0
            1 September 2022 12: 04
            We in the Russian Federation .... a shaft that is to master, not even grabbing stars from heaven. To serve what we mine and grow and transport. That's just to localize oil and gas and agriculture if - there will be a jump in GDP in the country at times ..... there are countries in the EU that cannot withstand competition within the EU or with Asians ... but they own all the basic technologies. Italy type...
            1. 0
              2 September 2022 00: 04
              For the last 30 years, we have been hearing about the shaft that is to be developed. The President lists it annually in his message. And what have you learned since then? As soon as the sanctions began, the production of passenger cars fell by 96%, and exhaust standards rolled back 25 years ago, to the level of "slightly better than Zil130." From the buyers of the new Zhiguli (by the way: the flagship in the Russian Federation) they take a receipt that they know that they will never be allowed into Europe on this car. About PB and other auto electronics - I will modestly keep silent ...
  12. BAI
    0
    31 August 2022 09: 32
    1.
    And American technical specialists, having read and listened to the mercenaries who fought in Ukraine, I doubt that they will line up to conclude contracts to work for the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

    And without them, Ukraine 100% will not be able to ensure the combat capability of American aircraft.

    The issue is solved simply - a service base in Romania, Poland. They serve the Americans and return the cars of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

    2.
    the creation of a material and technical operational base is not a matter of one of the month.

    The organization of complex and expensive infrastructure for servicing American aircraft is not one year.

    So the United States is counting on a war for at least 3 years. Well, the author needs to decide - months or years.

    3.
    It is not enough for pilots to be trained to fly Falcons; they need to be taught the tactics of using these particular aircraft so that they know the strengths and weaknesses of the machines.

    They are already being taught. The US is in a hurry. They think they have years. And judging by the pace of the NWO, they are right.
  13. +3
    31 August 2022 11: 10
    And now for the less good news.
    no, well, everything is not so bad in the USA, not only Bidens rule there

    Biden just belongs to the "moderates" and is criticized on this occasion. The average position for the hospital is that military assistance should be increased.
    At the same time, even under the "pacifist" Biden, in six months they went from helmets and body armor to OTRK and short-range cruise missiles (150-300 km).
    This is understandable, because there was not a single plant for the production of combat aircraft on the territory of Ukraine. In this regard, the Ukrainians were very unlucky, they really fell into direct dependence on Russia. Since now MiGs and Su are unattainable

    Naturally. Therefore, the restoration of Ukrainian aviation on Western aircraft has no alternative. Don't buy from the Chinese. It is only discussed whether this can have an impact on the course of a special military operation, or whether the issue will take too long and should be postponed until it is completed.
    The Ukrainian military believed that the country's Air Force needed from 72 to 108 aircraft, for which they planned to spend 200 billion hryvnias. THOSE hryvnia, which in the dollar was another 22-23. That is, 8,7 billion dollars.

    Yes, turnkey aviation of this size costs about $10 billion. Where to get these 10 yards (from American bounties or start spending confiscated money from the Russian Federation) is an internal American question.
    Aircraft, spare parts, materials, ammunition - this is money. Just take and throw them away

    The generosity of Americans is a rather unpredictable topic. In particular, during the flight from Afghanistan, equipment was abandoned approximately 10 times more expensive than the amount under discussion. So whether they will make such gifts to Ukrainians or not - then how the card will fall. By the way, to date, the amount spent on Ukraine is quite comparable to the required amount.
    But the main thing is that in the package of military assistance to Ukraine, which was approved by the US military department in August this year, there is not a word about aircraft.
    This, in my opinion, is the best answer to the question "When Ukraine will receive planes from the United States." Not now, not in the near future. Maybe in the next package. If he will. Perhaps never.

    In reality, in September-October, goals and objectives in this area for the 2023 fiscal year are considered. Taking into account the specifics of the theater of operations - for the winter campaign of 2022-2023 and the summer campaign of 2023. At the same time, we observe that the Armed Forces of Ukraine are taking exams for the previous semester. In Russia, on the third day of the revival at the front, they are already writing about the "Ukrainian fiasco", however, less operational people will sum up the results of the summer campaign at the end of September. Of course, the issue of aviation will be raised again, both unmanned and full-fledged.
    What the US military is relatively willing to share is the A-10 Thunderbolt 2 attack aircraft, aka Warthogs.
    And the Ukrainians categorically kick back from this junk and want at least the F-16.

    Well, let's say no one is eager to supply Ukraine with the A-10. However, the dispute is fundamental. A-10 is a battlefield aircraft. But the F-16 can work with long-range missiles and anti-ship missiles. The last option means the possibility of "escalation" - which Joe (so far) emphatically avoids.
    1. +1
      31 August 2022 15: 28
      I completely agree with you. The question is purely political and your example with trophies worth billions in Afghanistan confirms this. But the fact that the Americans will not be able to quickly train and provide materiel is not so simple here. called "rebel" armies (Afghan, Africa, LatamAmerica, etc.). And if the infantry was conditionally trained by green berets, then the Air Force also had units that were sharpened just to create bases, pilots and support mats in the warring territory using local (So it was in Vietnam, where trained Vietnamese were sitting at the controls of some American attack aircraft). This suggests that they have the experience and structures to quickly do the same in Ukraine. It's all about political will hi
  14. -1
    31 August 2022 12: 43
    The author, don’t be so harassed!) Shoigu deliberately slowed down the pace of the air defense system so that the forelocks had time to prepare everything, and train pilots with technicians and set up MTB.)))
  15. 0
    31 August 2022 13: 24
    As far as I understand, the A-10 is rubbish, not because they are somehow worse than the F-16 - each aircraft is good in its class, but because they have simply already taken off their resource, and the Ams want to take them from the storage base (and on actually aircraft graveyards)
  16. +1
    31 August 2022 13: 52
    Quote: ammunition
    Mi-5 is 10-24 times more efficient.
    Speed ​​, weapons , actions from " ambush " on the tip of all intelligence data , catapult ! ( the pilot does not die as on the Mi - 24 ) .


    Very controversial statement.
    The Mi-24 can take off from any level ground, but what about the "warthog"? Is he capable of taking off from field airfields, or give "concrete"?
    Speed ​​is not so hot, like a combat radius (flight range). A very good target for air defense systems (especially until you get rid of the combat load).
    Helicopters are capable of hovering and flying at ultra-low altitudes, making them difficult to detect and shoot down. Are the A-10s capable?
    A pilot with a catapult runs the risk of being captured if he is shot down over the battlefield. And how they will treat him in captivity is another question.
  17. 0
    31 August 2022 13: 59
    They are afraid to oppose their fighters against the Soviet ones. If there are American pilots and they lose, there will be no shame, if poorly trained Ukrainians or other Westerners, there is less shame, but the downed planes will fall into the hands of Russian design engineers, which means Chinese. Learn their new technology secrets. It's not good either. Therefore, they do not give. And without this, how can Ukrainians win? Only if the Russians run home in droves, hungry, naked and barefoot in winter. Here they are waiting.
  18. 0
    31 August 2022 14: 44
    While the Mattresses think to give / not to give, the country - error 404 - will cease to exist!
    1. +1
      31 August 2022 16: 18
      Do you think they care? They will even be satisfied if we join Ukraine at the end. The main thing for them is to cut down the EU with its euro as a competitor in the world currency market. But here we certainly pissed them off. Having gathered a cabal wishing to pay in national currencies.
  19. 0
    31 August 2022 18: 05
    From the point of view of retraining pilots and those. composition - money and time are needed approximately the same. What is on F16, what is on A10. The fact that they will shoot down A10 faster is a no-brainer. But they cost a lot in conservation. By the way, there are also heaps of F4 next to them. You can also donate without any problems. And the Americans themselves plan to use the F16 until at least 2040
  20. +1
    31 August 2022 18: 31
    About the planes. Both the author and the chat are trying to discuss the military-technical aspects of the issue. Operation, storage, maintenance... And there are no such aspects in this matter now. The author has already shown this to us in previous articles: in the time remaining for the country 404, it will not be possible to organize all this. There is only one aspect here: the performance "The steps of the Clown, bringing 404 closer to victory." One of the acts of the performance: "Look how I take care of our combat aviation, but all my efforts are buried by our Western partners." In this performance, even the (hypothetically) hosted program of "Warthogs" would have played against Zelensky. It would have turned out: “They gave me the planes, and I ruined them with the lack of ability to use them.” With the F-16, it would have turned out even worse: “They gave me GOOD planes, and I ruined them with my lack of ability to use them.” Here, for Zelya, the very thing is: “I ask, I ask, I care, I care, and the greedy partners pull and pull.” In this sense, insisting on the F-16, just plays to drag out the issue. They will definitely not be given, you can whine and pull the wave further. And if you agree to the A-10, then suddenly they will? And I will sit with them like a monkey with glasses under the stern eyes of the owners: “Well? You now have serviceable planes. Where is their proper use?

    About Gorbachev. I do not understand the gloating of dear Russians. Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev, who ruined the country and sold it to the West, died many years ago. Instead, he was left with a sick old man. His hellish punishment was listening to the fair opinion of the Russians about himself all these years. Now this old man is gone. Punishment (earthly, anyway) is over. Heavenly, by the way, may not completely coincide with the opinion of the Russians (but here I am not an expert). Everything that you are throwing at him now made sense until recently. As long as he could perceive. Now it no longer has.
  21. 0
    31 August 2022 19: 32
    Air junk? However ... Yes, and F16 they will start to let them go.
  22. 0
    31 August 2022 22: 14
    Without touching the essence of the article, here before me in the comments, various smart people have said everything more than once .... But this passage:
    To the Indians, what ungodly buyers,
    generally super! good Ah yes Roman, amused from the heart! laughing Thank you! good hi
  23. L W
    0
    31 August 2022 23: 37
    I didn’t quite understand why the F-16 is better instead of the A-10. Approximately one year of development. A-10 was quite good. Here, apparently, some of their views on the conduct of the war. I am more surprised by the attempt to rearm during the war with a complete replacement of the foundations. The plane is not a carbine: he took them, took the cartridges, that's all. This is TK, APAshki, repairs, spare parts. Guys, not the Second World War, the technique is more complicated. It’s hard for both the pilot and the equipment. Sounds weird at all. How to fly, how to repair? Or will they link to the site? Ok, easy, google translate
    1. 0
      1 September 2022 07: 06
      They cannot take similar aircraft from the Chinese. They used to be happy to sell, but because of the epikistory with Motor Sich, they will lose face in Asia.
      Otherwise, the Chinese could open, for the sake of dollars, paid "Afghan lend-lease" and "army aliexpress" - Taiwan (part of a unified China legally), for example, is already supplying, while the mainland ones are still morally holding on. It would have simply saved Uncle Sam - an endless source of cheap analogues of Soviet aircraft would have been opened. The Chinese would capture for the first time in history a piece of the Western military aviation market ...
  24. 0
    1 September 2022 08: 21
    Even if the A-10s are not given to the Ukrainians, the turboprop Pilatus and Tukano may well appear, and even with pilots (for now, Afghans). And they will be able to serve them themselves ...
    In capable hands, these airplanes are serious weapons.
    Well, Western "partners" can now think of this, they don't care how many these "gifts" will fly, if only the war continues ...
  25. 0
    1 September 2022 08: 25
    And the zeleboba also spoke about the most combat-ready navy, and immediately drowned Sagaidachny in Odessa.
  26. 0
    1 September 2022 12: 46
    "Pan Zelensky on March 24, at a video conference of the NATO summit, was very loudly indignant at the fact that the bloc had thousands of aircraft at its disposal, but they were not given a single one." He has not yet been allocated a special regime prison cell in Russia. So this is for now.
  27. 0
    1 September 2022 14: 11
    and there the Armenians dug in, calm for the US Air Force, everything they have under control will cut and saw everything)))
  28. +1
    1 September 2022 21: 56
    The A-10 score is not entirely clear.
    Its rival - the Su-25 - serves itself quite well, so why is this one "aviakhlam"?
  29. -1
    4 September 2022 21: 31
    The author was so carried away by the desire to be ironic, and naturally - safely for herself
    Which completely ignores the real reason for the actions of the leadership of the bourgeois governments of the Western countries - their desire to achieve the proposal of the leadership of Ukraine to occupy the country's territory with NATO armed forces.
    All these supposedly "discussions" and "trial" sendings of Ukrainian servicemen to master technology smoothly flow into the understanding that in order to "defend" Ukraine from Russia, the democracies of NATO and Europe need not only to give Ukraine aircraft, but to organize "infrastructure" on its territory for effective use ...total. According to one program of the Air Force, according to another - artillery, air defense systems, tank troops, etc.
    That is, to bring into the territory of Ukraine as many troops as needed to create this infrastructure, that is, about 200 or 300 thousand - to begin with. Under the pretext that they will "create" and "help" create an infrastructure on which the "Ukrainian" troops will master the equipment they need and ...
    That is, it is an occupation
    By the way, the government of a certain country inhabited by Russians, among other things, is leading to this.
  30. 0
    5 October 2022 05: 30
    And what if they suddenly decide and give? We (according to the reports of the "talking head" with the general's epaulettes) in the second week of the NMD destroyed the rotten ukroVVS, but we still DAILY shoot down several planes and helicopters.
  31. 0
    6 October 2022 19: 00
    And since when did the A-10 become rubbish ????
    Well, yes, the development is ancient, so what!??!? The wheel was also invented a long time ago - so no one is outraged that we ride on ancient developments.
    A-10 is quite up to par, and if he upgrades his avionics, it will be even better.
    No one demanded high speeds from him.
    And most importantly, he will be able to fulfill his tasks of supporting troops on the battlefield.
    Considering that the Americans are leaking information to Khokhols on RTR and EW, the careful use of the A-10 can give ours a decent headache.
    They will hang an AGM-65 on it and forward .. Warhead from 57 to 136 kilos.