MLRS "Cheburashka": a serious weapon with a funny name

25

Two MLRS "Cheburashka" after modernization, August 20, 2022


From the moment of its foundation, the Donetsk People's Republic tried to independently create and assemble the necessary weapons and military equipment. Over time, she managed to move from handicraft assembly to full-fledged industrial production and close part of her needs. One of the most interesting types of weapons created in the DPR was a multiple launch rocket system or a heavy flamethrower system with the funny name "Cheburashka".



Own projects


As it became known later, work on the topic of rocket artillery began in the DPR back in 2015. The newly founded State Innovation Company played a leading role in it. In addition, various enterprises of the republic were involved as manufacturers of certain components and assemblies.

In the next 2016, the republican industry produced several samples of new equipment, and they were immediately tested in the context of the ongoing conflict. Despite the specific origin and the lack of necessary experience from the developers, the new MLRS and missile systems have shown themselves well.


On May 9, 2018, an exhibition of weapons was held in Donetsk, within the framework of which the public was shown for the first time MLRS of their own design. The main exhibits were the Cheburashka and Snezhinka systems, as well as rockets for them. At the same time, it was reported that this technique had already participated in battles and inflicted fire damage on the enemy.

The frivolous name of the new MLRS was explained quite simply. In 2015, a Ukrainian military official accused the DPR of using a Russian heavy flamethrower called Cheburashka. He probably meant CBT "Pinocchio", but mixed up the fairy-tale characters. In the DPR, they “showed respect” - and a flamethrower system with the previously named name actually appeared at the front.

Shortly after the premiere of the new technology, on May 11, the head of the republic, Alexander Zakharchenko, issued a decree on the formation of the Tactical Rocket Forces of the DPR (RVTN). This structure included units operating Cheburashka and other new models.


D. Pushilin inspects ammunition for "Cheburashka"

Later they showed an episode of the recent combat use of the new MLRS. The short video showed the processes of loading the launcher and preparing for firing, setting up the fire control system and actually shooting. They also showed a video of drone- scout who found the target and carried out the adjustment.

As far as is known, by 2018 only a few Cheburashka MLRS were built. This technique was used in various operations and regularly hit the designated targets. These systems still remain in service and are used in the current operation. They solve fire missions together with other MLRS of the DPR and the Russian army.

On August 20, the head of the DPR, Denis Pushilin, said that two modernized MLRS / TOS had entered the troops of the republic. The vehicles will serve in the Cascade formation. The head of state expressed confidence that the new owners will use this technique in the best possible way.


MLRS in firing position, May 2018

From available components


From a technical point of view, "Cheburashka" is a typical modern multiple launch rocket system, similar to other examples of this class. At the same time, such a MLRS has several interesting features that give it a distinctive look and / or provide special combat capabilities.

It should be noted that "Cheburashka" and other new products were created in the conditions of a civil war and serious restrictions of various kinds. As a result, some of the design features were due to the choice of developers, while other features were of a forced or compromise nature. Nevertheless, the influence of negative factors was reduced to a minimum.

MLRS "Cheburashka" is built on a three-axle chassis "KrAZ-6322". Probably, captured vehicles recaptured from the Ukrainian army or taken from its bases were used. Such a platform has sufficiently high running characteristics, and a load capacity of up to 12 tons made it possible to install all the necessary devices and devices.


Loading the launcher

Two identical launchers were immediately placed on the long cargo platform of the chassis - one after the other. Each such installation is a box-shaped package of guides, probably armored, on a U-shaped slewing device. Guidance drives with remote control are provided. The installation has 32 launch tubes - 4 rows of 8 pcs. Accordingly, the full ammunition load of "Cheburashka" includes 64 missiles.

Fire control is carried out from the operator's console in a remote version. The gunner-operator can choose the guides to be used and perform sequential or simultaneous launch of missiles. Ignition is carried out by an electric impulse - as on other modern MLRS. Due to the separate aiming of the two installations, simultaneous firing at different targets is possible.


Operator console

"Cheburashka" uses its own ammunition in an unusual caliber of 217 mm. Probably, such a diameter of the guide and rocket was chosen taking into account the available raw materials and production capabilities. The solid propellant rocket has a cylindrical body with an ogive warhead. There are no planes on the body: the projectile is a turbojet and is stabilized by oblique nozzles that give it rotation. Firing range - from 1,5 to 9,6 km.

Warhead - volume-detonating. The mass of the charge and combat parameters were not specified. The presence of such combat equipment makes it possible to classify the Cheburashka MLRS as a subclass of heavy flamethrower systems - in fact, this is a close analogue of the latest Russian TOS-2 Tosochka.

Strengths


At one time, the MLRS / TOS "Cheburashka" and other developments of the DPR attracted the attention of specialists and the public. Obviously, this was facilitated by the unusual name of the combat vehicle. However, this project has other features that distinguish it from other multiple launch rocket systems.


Volley at the enemy

First of all, the Cheburashka project is interesting for its origin. In the context of a difficult war against the Kyiv regime, having very limited capabilities, the DPR was able to develop and put into production a rather complex model of weapons and ammunition for it almost from scratch. The very fact of the appearance of "Cheburashka", "Snowflakes", etc. is a cause for pride.

The technical result of the project is also very interesting. Attention is drawn to the presence of two launchers at once. Due to this, in terms of the size of the Cheburashka ammunition load, it surpasses any other modern MLRS of mass models. At the same time, the possibility of simultaneously attacking different targets was obtained, which can be useful in a number of situations.

A major achievement should be considered the original ammunition. With a non-standard caliber and limited dimensions, it carries a fairly powerful volumetric detonating warhead, which allows you to hit manpower and equipment in open areas or in unfortified buildings. The power of such a warhead compensates for the limited range in which the Cheburashka is inferior to other MLRS.


Shooting results

You can compare the MLRS / TOS of the DPR troops with a similar model - the Russian Tosochka system. So, both complexes are made on a car chassis and show high mobility. At the same time, TOS-2 has a reservation and is able to protect the calculation from shelling. Cheburashka has a great advantage in ready-to-use ammunition: 60 missiles versus 18 for Tosochka. However, Russian TOS use a larger and heavier projectile with a greater payload. The firing range of both systems is almost on the same level.

Based on operating experience


Thus, even in the most difficult conditions, the DPR was able to use its scientific, technical and production potential. On her own, she developed and brought to production several missile systems with certain features. In this case, we are talking about industrial designs with fairly high performance and special combat capabilities.

"Cheburashki" were not built in a large series and were not widely used, but even in this case they were able to make a significant contribution to the defense of the DPR. Now such equipment is involved in the liberation of Donbass and is used together with Russian MLRS and TOS. The results of the use and operating experience of such rocket artillery clearly show that the DNR's own projects from 2015-16. were necessary, important and promising. And all the efforts of that time fully justified themselves.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    26 August 2022 04: 45
    This is no longer Cheburashka, but a real Fighting Cheburator! good
    1. +6
      26 August 2022 05: 46
      Quote: Amateur
      This is no longer Cheburashka, but a real Fighting Cheburator! good

      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        26 August 2022 06: 25
        If this is "Chebuda banging my head against the wall", then what kind of power will "Crocodile Gena" be?
  2. +6
    26 August 2022 05: 50
    Well done, men!
    You are not only brave, but also creative!
    Meet xoxlovermacht with Donetsk bread and salt!..
  3. +1
    26 August 2022 05: 54
    Since the time of "Katyusha" MLRS - our love love
  4. +2
    26 August 2022 06: 08
    Well, well done guys, what else can I say! Keep it up
  5. +7
    26 August 2022 07: 01
    Due to this, in terms of the size of the ammunition load, "Chebudolbanus' head against the wall" surpasses any other modern MLRS of mass models.

    It should be clarified, one of the large MLRS ammunition ready to fire.
    At least the Belarusian Belgrade has 40 ready-made "shots" in the package for 40 carried behind the cab.

    By the way, he is not the only one with such a layout.
    China and Romania have similar machines.
    In terms of missiles ready to fire, the sickest monster is in the service of the UAE "Jobaria MCL".

    By the way, it was also created not without the help of Belarusians!
    1. +2
      28 September 2022 12: 02
      That infrequent case when a comment is like a small post, thanks! The last picture is amazing, of course, but losing such a system would be 2,67 times more offensive than "cheburashka" and 9,5 times more offensive than "sad". And it is quite possible to lose it, due to the very limited firing range of this system. At least in my understanding.
      1. 0
        20 November 2022 17: 31
        Quote from SincerityX
        And it is quite possible to lose it, due to the very limited firing range of this system.

        Hmmm...! OK. 10 km - limited range? May be ! But...! For comparison: 1. The 140-mm MLRS BM-14 has a range of firing with turbojet projectiles (TRS) of approx. 10 km ... 2. MLRS BM-24 has a firing range of 240-mm "basic" TRS of 10 km or even less! (Only TRS "2nd generation" had a range of up to 16-17 km!). So put a banana to your nose! By the way, for "Cheburashka" a range of up to 10 km was indicated on purpose; according to the Minsk agreements, it was forbidden to have weapons with a range of more than 10 km in the "contact zone"!
        1. 0
          22 November 2022 09: 28
          You are attracting stats to tactics. This thing, judging by the picture, has 3 “grad” launcher blocks, which is a maximum of 30 km. Many modern artillery models fly perfectly at such a range, and this installation will most likely be quickly lost. Since this is 1) a semi-trailer 2) wheeled 3) almost 99% that she needs retractable supports for shooting, which means that the folding will be longer than that of the same hail. And that's what I said in my post, that it would be much more offensive to lose this installation because of the price and the lost BC. He spoke with irony.
  6. +2
    26 August 2022 09: 43
    Shushpanzer a la "Nebelwerfer" in a modern version. Although, cheap and cheerful. But normal MLRS is inferior in all respects.
    1. +1
      27 August 2022 11: 09
      Andrei:

      Well done of course!

      How would you rate the spread of the Cheburashka salvo compared to systems with a much larger ratio of missile length to caliber?
    2. +1
      28 September 2022 12: 06
      A controversial statement, at least because we do not actually know these parameters, except perhaps for the ergonomics of the remote control. Secondly, in principle, creating a TOS projectile is higher mathematics in terms of complexity, even more matanistic than a cumulative projectile, and even more so in a small caliber. So I haven’t heard that TOSs were in service somewhere other than the Russian Federation and the LDNR. (And at the end of the referendums, then only in the Russian Federation, I assume, on the basis of "exit polls").
  7. +2
    26 August 2022 09: 46
    The technical level is on top. It is not easy to create this in the shortest possible time. And an order of magnitude more difficult than adapting a helicopter launcher for a pickup truck. Respect to the engineers.
  8. +2
    26 August 2022 14: 08
    , "from scratch to develop and put into production a rather complex model of weapons" among the people, usually in such cases they are new "" zero is much more fiction" tau and with "Cheburashkouy"
    1. 0
      30 September 2022 15: 43
      They say not zero, "need". lol In other words, "out of desperation" wink
      1. +1
        1 October 2022 10: 34
        I'm sorry, but I'm always in a hurry, and everything happens in a hurry
  9. 0
    26 August 2022 15: 41
    And all this under the tail of the Armed Forces of Ukraine!
  10. +2
    26 August 2022 18: 17
    When the first "Cheburashki" appeared, there was no information about the possibility of targeting 2 adversary objects! It is possible that the essence of modernization lies in the possibility of pointing at 2 "addresses"! As for the "Snowflake", this is an "alternative" to the "past" Soviet "Luna" and the American "Little John"! "It's a pity" that there are 2 missiles ... if there were 4, then one could say that this is an "analogue" of the Soviet BM-20! Once I saw a video showing tests of "Snowflakes", "Cheburashka", "Chinese" ... Then for a second samples of the MLRS "flashed", which never appeared at parades and an exhibition in the DPR ... I did not recognize in them and the "Soviet-Russian" MLRS! What is it? "Stillborn" creations of the military-industrial complex of the DPR, or is it sho-ta? what
  11. 0
    27 August 2022 05: 17
    Pushilin is getting fatter and fatter. But he was a thin boy. Now like a penguin
  12. +1
    27 August 2022 10: 56
    Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
    There are similar machines

    It seems that the Serbs also have.
  13. +1
    27 August 2022 11: 00
    A good system for assault operations, although not only.
    First, thermobaric ammunition. Against oporniks and fortifications - that's it, now TOSs and their analogues have turned out to be extremely in demand.
    Second BK 64 missiles. He left, fired off a shaft of shells and took off. A simple idea is to pour more, and exactly where you need it.
    Thirdly, caliber. In fact, the level of the "Hurricane" system, only the range is close.
    And fourthly, the convenience of loading and delivering ammo. The projectile is short, it can be loaded without a crane, although the caliber is rather big.

    Of the minuses - a small niche due to the range, only assault operations. In fact, the same highly specialized weapon as the Sun.
    Well, anti-fragmentation armor would also not hurt with such a short shoulder.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    19 September 2022 11: 42
    Does anyone have information on the used bullet??? and also about why it was necessary to develop a new caliber 217 mm ???????
  16. 0
    2 November 2022 08: 45
    The development is ingenious, in a good way. It works at the range at which you can confidently conduct reconnaissance with superiority of the enemy in the air. Due to this, a short engine and a larger warhead.
    The unique caliber is understandable - so that if the car is lost, the enemy has nothing to shoot from it.
    1. 0
      3 November 2022 18: 31
      I think that the caliber, like everything else, is a forced decision, due to the most difficult conditions in which, ordinary men with no experience in this area, from available materials and without special equipment, only on pure enthusiasm and the Great idea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbvictory over the Antichrist and , assembled these amazing machines of retribution! In short, what was, then they put it! Usual Russian ingenuity!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"