In the US press: it is unprofitable for Washington to recognize Russia as a sponsor of terrorism

26
In the US press: it is unprofitable for Washington to recognize Russia as a sponsor of terrorism

It is unprofitable for Washington to recognize Russia as a sponsor of terrorism. The US State Department categorically opposes such a move, and advises Congress not to take it.

The American portal Politico writes about this, citing sources.

The US press claims that the State Department is quietly trying to convince congressmen to refuse to recognize the Russian Federation as a sponsor of terrorism. The American Foreign Ministry fears that this decision could disrupt the hard-won agreement on the export of grain from Ukrainian territory, and also force the United States to impose unfavorable sanctions against Russia.

Because of this, American businesses would have to break off business ties with partners from the Russian Federation, because making deals between the two countries would become problematic. Particularly painful for the United States will be the inability to obtain Russian materials for the nuclear power industry in the United States.

A country on the terrorist blacklist - a badge of shame bestowed only on North Korea, Syria, Cuba and Iran - is suffering from comprehensive sanctions, meaning the U.S. is effectively cutting Americans off from doing business with those countries.

- stated in the Politico article.

The head of the US State Department, Anthony Blinken, personally opposes the inclusion of Russia in the list of countries-sponsors of terrorism.


The situation is complicated by the fact that the US Senate has already adopted this anti-Russian resolution. True, it is only advisory in nature and has no legal force.
  • U.S. Department of State
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    19 August 2022 13: 17
    Are you looking for profit? Being a frank sponsor of terrorism all over the world.
    1. +16
      19 August 2022 13: 29

      Straight lights of democracy...
  2. +1
    19 August 2022 13: 18
    From the secrets and intricacies of the economy, it is not clear who needs whom more, we are for them or they are for us .... If they were for us, they would definitely have branded ....
  3. +2
    19 August 2022 13: 18
    who would doubt ... it would be profitable, the states would not miss such a chance without hesitation ...
  4. -5
    19 August 2022 13: 19
    Washington and so perfectly copes with the supply. Kots writes: "It is reported that an air defense system worked in the Kerch region. Kerch, for a second, is located in the east of the peninsula and is adjacent to the Crimean bridge." (C)
    The nearest salorekh is at a distance of 300 km, i.e. received long-range missiles.
    1. 0
      19 August 2022 14: 31
      There are drones
      1. 0
        19 August 2022 14: 43
        Well if so, but I think the delivery is a matter of time.
  5. +1
    19 August 2022 13: 19
    You will completely confuse the Balts so much - so whether or not to recognize the Russian Federation as a sponsor of terrorists? And then they have already begun ... What to do now - continue or roll back? What all the same decisions to make free sovereign Baltic countries?
    1. +3
      19 August 2022 13: 25
      It is time for the sovereign Baltic states to dissolve themselves. Why so tormented by the gap "to recognize, then not to recognize." Yes, and the last monuments will soon end, then what to do? Nobody needs sprats, they don’t bring non-ferrous metal from Russia, the cargo terminals in the ports are empty ....
      1. +1
        19 August 2022 17: 03
        Quote: Ural_engineer
        It is time for the sovereign Baltic states to dissolve themselves. Why so tormented by the gap "to recognize, then not to recognize."

        They don’t even need to strain, - as the striped-eared uncle says, they will do it.
        And my uncle will most likely tell you to admit it.
        He cares about his own economy, not trishprotnaya. hi
  6. +1
    19 August 2022 13: 21
    In other words: the United States does whatever they want and no one tells them ..
  7. +1
    19 August 2022 13: 22
    The most painful thing for the United States, START Z, the lag in hypersound, heat Europe and get people at any time without warning, there is no connection, because there are no embassies, not at all. Neither in the USA nor in NATO. bully
    1. +3
      19 August 2022 13: 42
      Quote: tralflot1832
      The most painful for the USA

      What is painful is useful laughing
  8. 0
    19 August 2022 13: 24
    As usual - we play here, we don’t play here, here I wrapped the fish. Well, it's not even worth recalling that the United States is the main sponsor of world terrorism. Axiom.
  9. +1
    19 August 2022 13: 24
    The United States is a real sponsor of terrorism all over the world. the creation of al-Qaeda and ISIS is proof of this
  10. +1
    19 August 2022 13: 43
    The situation is complicated by the fact that in the United States, and in general throughout the Western world, it is not those who make decisions that are responsible, but scapegoats such as presidents and prime ministers. Such a system of power is very convenient to spoil others with impunity, but it can also destroy all of humanity.
  11. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  12. +1
    19 August 2022 13: 47
    The situation is complicated by the fact that the US Senate has already adopted this anti-Russian resolution. True, it is only advisory in nature and has no legal force.
    laughing And ours and yours ... And no matter how yes and no matter how, but there is a resolution .. laughing
  13. +2
    19 August 2022 13: 58
    US intelligence has good operational positions in the Russian Federation. How and from whom did they learn about the timing of the start of the NWO?
    And one more thing - to declare the United States a participant in the conflict, to expel the US embassy from the Russian Federation, to impose economic sanctions against the United States. hi
  14. +1
    19 August 2022 14: 06
    To begin with, let Blunkin recognize his America as a sponsor of terrorism and shut up on this.
  15. 0
    19 August 2022 14: 21
    What, and ISIS (banned in the Russian Federation) and Azov (once banned in the USA) were sponsored?
    1) Was Lavrov issued a visa? And what is Antonov doing there? Why is he not recalled for consultations?
    2) Switzerland was denied recognition of neutrality, but what are our representatives doing there in all sorts of bodies?
    We must at least demand the transfer of the UN and UN bodies to completely different places.
    "Articulate the Narrative". "Consequently". "Inclusive".
  16. 0
    19 August 2022 14: 27
    True, it is only advisory in nature and has no legal force.

    Well, it depends on who to recommend. lol The Balts took it seriously. Yes
    1. 0
      19 August 2022 22: 01
      I also took it seriously as another step towards a military clash or even to war.
  17. -1
    19 August 2022 14: 37
    In the US press: it is unprofitable for Washington to recognize Russia as a sponsor of terrorism

    Still, the US press is the mouthpiece of American moneybags, and the opinion of the authorities is clearly expressed, although it has no legal force:
    ... the US Senate has already adopted this anti-Russian resolution. True, it is only advisory in nature and has no legal force.

    It is only surprising that in Russia they continue to listen to the statements of those who are nothing of themselves.
    I assume that this is how hysteria is whipped up in Russia, distracting the population from real internal problems.
    It is also curious that such a position is beneficial to someone - the position of replicating the barking of "yard dogs".
    *****
    So a few minutes ago, the Russian media reported that the negotiations allegedly being prepared by Erdogan and the meeting between Putin and Zelensky are a priori impossible, because the drug addict set impossible conditions - the withdrawal of Russian troops from all over Ukraine (including Crimea (???).
    Complete economic disregard for Ukraine and unfriendly countries will allow Russia to ease the pressure on the minds of its own citizens.
    Stop talking about threats. It's time to act in the interests of the Russian majority, who are "up to their waists", "what will Princess Marya Aleksevna say there."
    Europe already divides Russians into good and bad, being a priori the bedding of the North American country, and will soon become its cesspool.
  18. 0
    19 August 2022 14: 45
    And why do the fighters hide the kokushka, are they afraid of what ?!
  19. 0
    19 August 2022 19: 06
    Crafty sheeds are afraid of losing power over Russia and its resources.
    Foggy fables with a liquid odor are fed to the lop-eared and gullible.
  20. 0
    20 August 2022 06: 19
    Especially painful for the US will be the inability to obtain Russian materials for the nuclear power of the United States. "[US nuclear power] is dependent on cheap Russian uranium", They are stuffing Ukraine with weapons and imposing sanctions against Russia and Russia is selling it at bargain prices cheap uranium for TEVL and soon in this case, they will privatize Russia for free along with uranium. As Gorbachev said, what do you understand, this is big politics. And if they don’t give away cheap uranium, they will become sponsors of terrorism)

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"