At the forum "Army-2022" Belarus showed a new armored personnel carrier MZKT-690003

At the exposition of the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant at the international forum of armaments and military equipment "Army-2022", which is taking place in Russia, Belarus showed a new floating armored personnel carrier MZKT-690003 (V-2). This prototype has already been tested.

The combat vehicle is capable of moving on land with a maximum speed of 110 kilometers per hour, and when overcoming water obstacles, it can swim 10 km / h. This armored vehicle weighs 22 tons. Its body is solid all-metal. The salon is equipped with a suspended floor to mitigate the impact on the crew and troops during the explosion. The seats in the car have energy-absorbing properties.

The armored personnel carrier can be used to deliver the personnel of the units, as well as for infantry fire support. In addition, the machine is capable of engaging in battle against enemy armored vehicles.

The Belarusian armored personnel carrier appeared before the public for the second time, before that it was demonstrated a year ago. But now, unlike the previous time, it is already fully prepared for sale, having previously passed all the required tests.

The Army-2022 forum is being held this year from 15 to 21 August. Delegations of the armed forces of 72 states of the world take an active part in it. In total, it was planned to hold about 300 different events. They go not only in Kubinka near Moscow and at the training ground in Alabino, but also in all military districts of Russia.

Comments

[dmi.pris1]

Well done. I would not be surprised that this sample will be delivered to the troops faster than our Boomerang

[max702]

It will not take off, like all the crafts of the military-industrial complex of Belarus .. Another craft in the spirit of "Pirana" with an incomprehensible purpose ..

[Murmur 55]

A lot of useful things were shown and demonstrated, only our fighters need it now and on an industrial scale.

[valentine light]

Why on an industrial scale armored personnel carrier?

more industry in Germany will not be able to give.
BTR 82 A about 2000 units.
Year of development - 2010. This is a new vehicle from a deeply modernized armored personnel carrier 80 model in our army.
Further, our military inspector has a little time to choose, testing a conceptually new armored personnel carrier.
It is known that the series for I price 82 A is lower than some promising armored personnel carriers considered since the 2000s.
Now it is important to saturate the army with new vehicles with increased combat capabilities in order to completely replace the BTR 80.
Then probably "Bmerang" and "Kurgan" and so on. Will do.

[ramzay21]

Why on an industrial scale armored personnel carrier?

The BTR-82A is not a new armored personnel carrier, but a modernization of the Soviet BTR-80, that is, it is the same unprotected cardboard box from the 80s. The year is 2022 and all the normal armies of the world are armed with heavy infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers and not at exhibitions, and we continue to ride on armor like in Afghanistan or Chechnya.

[valentine light]

And he said - here are my words "... This is a new vehicle from a deeply modernized armored personnel carrier 80 .."

82nd is a new approach to the very concept of armored personnel carriers.
It is impossible to fill the army with expensive vehicles right away, this is an AXIOM, plus there is also an advantage in the development of many components and mechanisms, how a new vehicle created from scratch in different combat conditions will behave is unknown, how and what is needed, but what is Ottoism, like an inhabited tower.
The new 300 horsepower engine is more powerful than the KAMAZ 740.14-300 engine.

The Americans have created similar to the armored personnel carrier 80
BTR "Styker".

[ramzay21]

BTR-82A is a morally obsolete armored personnel carrier from the 80s, there is nothing in it that meets modern requirements. There is no mine protection, the same cardboard armor against light small arms.

You can’t fill the army with expensive cars right away, this is an AXIOM

And it doesn't fill up at all. Armata, Kurganets and Boomerang were demonstrated at parades 8 years ago, but they are still not in the army, only at exhibitions and parades. Therefore, in parades we have one army, with modern equipment, and in real combat operations only Soviet armored vehicles, developed 40-60 years ago.

[valentine light]

I explain, Any armored personnel carrier is a means of delivering infantry to the line of attack, as well as the delivery of ammunition for the squad.
With an automatic cannon, an armored personnel carrier should support infantry from cover or at a distance.

Participation in the battle of the armored personnel carrier was not expected.

Yes, .. while in the army it is necessary to re-equip with stronger armored personnel carriers and 82 is suitable in all respects, including the price!
Armor 7-10 mm, as in 80, BUT the survival of the crew and troops is increased due to the appearance of an internal Kevlar anti-fragmentation lining.
The concept of a heavy armored personnel carrier is not clearly defined; according to preliminary requirements, a heavy vehicle must participate in an assault or raids.
Or limit yourself to safe delivery to the place of unloading and escort of columns.

As a promising assault vehicle on a caterpillar track.
For example, the tank support vehicle "Terminator".
But updated armored personnel carriers are needed now and the output from 82 is not bad.
The Americans have a similar "Stryker", it was not in vain that they copied ...

Inevitably, conceptually new armored personnel carriers will be.

[ramzay21]

Plywood armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles are no longer able to perform tasks on a modern battlefield against a normal army saturated with anti-tank systems, strike UAVs and modern reconnaissance equipment.

The concept of a heavy armored personnel carrier is not clearly defined,

The concept of heavy infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers is not defined with us, but it is well defined in countries where the lives of their soldiers are valued and in these countries this equipment is in the troops and not at exhibitions. And our soldiers ride on armor, like 80 years ago.

The Americans have a similar "Stryker"

And the Americans also have heavy infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers, and it would never occur to them to send Stryker not only to the battlefield, but even to deliver infantry to the battlefield against a serious enemy.

[valentine light]

Name at least one heavy armored personnel carrier of the US Army.

There is a heavy infantry fighting vehicle - "Brandley" and a task according to the realities of Iraq, work against tanks and lightly armored vehicles, landing is possible, but not practiced.
The official description of the US APC:
- ".. Stryker are the main armament of the mechanized brigades of the US Army and are designed to transport units of the motorized infantry squad to the battlefield, providing fire support during and after dismounting ..."


So, don't reinvent the wheel.

You can have your own opinion :)

[User_neydobniu]

Well, at least the army of the Republic of Belarus is rearming

[Novik225]

Well, in order to say this, you must first find out - and how many of these machines have already been delivered to the troops.

[User_neydobniu]

Well, in order to say this, you must first find out - and how many of these machines have already been delivered to the troops.

Well, you don’t have to judge everyone by yourself, in the Republic of Belarus the army is being updated, which cannot but rejoice and these armored personnel carriers will be sent to the troops

[Novik225]

And yet - how many have already been sent?

[New-pechkin]

you don’t have to judge everyone by yourself, the army is being updated in the Republic of Belarus

It goes, they are re-equipping with T72B3, BTR82A, SU-30, Tor-M2, MI-35, etc. There is no need to compare the rearmament of Russia and Belarus, these are incomparable things.

[max702]

It's more like a designer layout in general..

[Normann]

A couple of brigades are much easier to re-equip than a dozen armies and four fleets, and another flotilla at the same time.

[Nexcom]

It's a pity the protection characteristics are not indicated (what and how the armor holds). It would be interesting to read. Although if he swims, then probably at best he probably holds 12.7, but 30 mm is probably unlikely. And anti-cumulative screens have probably not yet been developed either.

[aszzz888]

Armament - gun thirty, in all likelihood ... and that's all for now. Apart from smoke grenade launchers. It is possible, and most likely, that they will put something along the edges of the tower. At least, by eye, they ask for a pair of rocket blocks there. Well done Belarusians!

[Nexcom]

Why would he need more? most likely it can be worked out from the CPV. Unfortunately.

[hagrid]

Most likely, modules with different weapons will be developed.

[Nexcom]

And why don’t the Syabry want to invest in the development of the Boomerang or whatever it is? Together we could do it faster. They would put both themselves and Syabram. Or not, not an option?

[SaLaR]

The Syabry wanted to make MLRS with the Russian brothers, but they were sent ... I had to stir up with the Chinese .... Probably the same garbage happened with the armored personnel carrier .......

[Nexcom]

Sorry, if so, sorry.

[SaLaR]

Well, why ... At least Polonaise appeared .... Thank you to friends Chinese...

[House 25 Sq. 380]

Well, why ... At least Polonaise appeared .... Thanks to our Chinese friends ...

For the polonaise, I had to transfer the technical specifications to the chassis .... To my Chinese friends ...
When the Russian brothers asked the same for the transfer of the Iskanders, a refusal came ....

[House 25 Sq. 380]

wow, bose, my brother immediately put a minus ...

[hagen]

Quote: SaLaR

The Syabry wanted to make MLRS with the Russian brothers, but they were sent ...

Syabry has recently been very sick of multi-vector. Forgot? where they will look in a couple of years, they themselves do not know. And how broken integration hiccups us, we have already tasted with Ukraine. Now we observe the rule - the entire defense industry is from domestic production.

[SaLaR]

A long time ago one-vector Russia stopped selling uranium gas and oil to the West ..... Something I haven’t heard of this ...

[hagen]

Quote: SaLaR

A long time ago, one-vector Russia stopped selling uranium gas and oil to the West ..... Something I have not heard of this ...

What can you do to earn a living and feed your ally... And in response, he did not even recognize Crimea, and still asks for gas at the price of Smolensk, sabotaging the agreed and signed integration program. Until recently, it was Poland that was allowed to have its place in the Belarusian media, while the Russian ones were either under pressure or banned altogether. Undoubtedly, we need a "buffer" with the West. Here we endure...

[SaLaR]

Do not lie .. Russian media in Belarus at least one place to eat ... And Crimea has long been recognized by Sberbank and other Russian banks? Cellular operators? Airlines??? So, from the beginning, put things in order, and then blather at Belarus ....Endured.... Like it, don't like it - be patient, my beauty.

[hagen]

Quote: SaLaR

Have Sberbank and other Russian banks recognized Crimea long ago? Cellular operators? Airlines???

It's none of your business. Russia organizes domestic policy based on its economic needs, and not to the detriment of you, by the way. Moreover, both banks and mobile operators work in Crimea. Especially for them, created by the same founder as Sberbank, for example. And then, what a way to nod to the side, learn to answer for yourself. But judging by the terminology, you have no real argument. And you will become "terpils" if Russia "multi-vector" turns away from you.

[SaLaR]

That's right .. There is nothing to nod at others when you yourself are in shit .... From the beginning, wash yourself ....

[SaLaR]

If Russia turns away, then the holy place is never empty ..

[Jackson]

First, take an interest in where all the industrial products of the Republic of Belarus go. In RF. Of course, a holy place is never empty. The policy of the West towards the colonies worked out like clockwork. Redemption of enterprises, their closure, replacement of their goods. You will grow red mullet for Europe. If they allow it, of course.

[Misha Honest]

Quote: Jackson

You will grow red mullet for Europe. If they allow it, of course.

It seems to me that he is talking about Chinese comrades, and not about the European Reich ... And the Persians and Arabs may be interested - the car is good ...

[Normann]

Russia will turn its back on its only ally? Are you out of your mind?

[jdiver]

> And he didn’t even recognize Crimea in response, but he also asks for gas at the price of Smolensk,
Correct claim. Belarus and Lukashenko are closer to Crimea than Sberbank and Gref.

[hector]

Quote: Hagen

Syabry has recently been very sick of multi-vector. Forgot?

That's just not Russia to reproach Belarus for its multi-vector approach. Until now, Russia has not abandoned it.

[hagen]

Quote: ettore

That's just not Russia to reproach Belarus for its multi-vector approach. Until now, Russia has not abandoned it.

Only here we are putting missile systems in the Republic of Belarus, this is in response to Lukashenka that the Russians do not have enough brains. Of course, how can we guess shrimp in the swamps to catch? This RB is cashing in on Russian-European tensions. And we trust her (we let the goat into the garden), and in response, here and there, the sanctioned product strives to sell us under its own brand (with a surcharge, of course ).

[SaLaR]

So we learn from Russia .. Your entire import substitution turned out to be a Chinese product with a Russian label ....

[hagen]

Quote: SaLaR

So we learn from Russia .. Your entire import substitution turned out to be a Chinese product with a Russian label ....

Well, what kind of ally is that?! Our allies are our Army and Navy.

[hector]

Quote: Hagen

Well, what kind of ally is that?!

One Belarusian said: "Do you know why Belarus was wary of Russia? Because, until recently, it was not sure that Russia would go to the end and not abandon everything halfway." From myself I will add - and will not betray as after 1991.

Our allies are our Army and Navy.

They are, yes, but is Russia an ally with its army and navy.?

[hagen]

Quote: ettore

They are, yes, but is Russia an ally with its army and navy.?

Russia would not stand behind the back of the Belarusian in 2020, he would live today in a completely different country. Perhaps with a different name... Today, when international law has become the law of the strong, only the most gifted do not understand that small states cannot live fully sovereign. Only large countries can afford independence in decisions and actions. Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, therefore, a direct benefit for the full growth of their peoples to live in a single state. But the political elite of both Ukraine and Belarus does not want to part with their legal disobedience to their own laws, plus it is not beneficial for the United States to have a strong competitor in world affairs. So every effort is being made to prevent our three countries from uniting into one, among other things, using the human weaknesses of the leaders of these countries. The United States directly subjugated Ukraine and unleashed a war back in 2014. In Belarus, in 2020, they decided to repeat the Ukrainian experience. But it didn't fly. This does not mean that they will not try other options. The security logic suggests that integration with the Republic of Belarus is beneficial for Russia. It is extremely beneficial (as well as the security of the population of the Republic of Belarus). And Lukashenka understands this very well. Therefore, he uses this situation and tries to bargain for himself (and for the Republic of Belarus) conditions comparable with the subjects of the Russian Federation while maintaining independence in areas of foreign and economic policy that are sensitive for the Russian Federation. And since this clearly falls out of the norms of morality and justice, then our Union State, even though it has been almost a quarter of a century, but in fact "things are still there." And no matter what we crumble at each other, the fate of our countries is closely intertwined. If we want to survive as national subjects, we must unite. Both politically and economically. Because mentally we are very close to each other. But unfortunately, until Lukashenka resolves his issues of ambition and ambition, he will be a brake on the movement towards unity. Unfortunately, there are no better candidates for the post of leaders of the unification movement in Belarus today. The political field has been cleared. Ukraine in the current state of its politicum can not be taken into account. Everything is running there. M-yes. And not without our connivance. It must be stated that today, without the aggressive activity of the unifying center, it is impossible to create a powerful independent subject of geopolitics. The fragments of the USSR do not yet understand the benefits in the unity of a large state. Their leaders decide their personal issues to the detriment of their own people.

[hector]

Quote: Hagen

Only here we put missile systems in the Republic of Belarus

Russia is deploying ITS missiles for ITS protection on distant approaches, and does not supply them to Belarus.

Quote: Hagen

This RB is cashing in on Russian-European tensions. And we trust her (we let the goat into the garden)

Only long before that, there were ugly stories from Russia with oil (you can also say that Russia was profiting), a story with dirty oil (Russia immediately paid compensation in the EU, but Belarus with great difficulty, resisting for a long time) even earlier, also an ugly story with accession to the WTO (after Belarus agreed to the introduction of Russian customs duties).

[jdiver]

All the oligarchs who brought hundreds of billions of greenery out of the country to the west and then gave it all or almost all of it to our enemies have already been reined in and excommunicated from the body. Only dad Alexander Grygorevich remained - a bloodsucker.

[hell machine]

Kurganets and Boomerang are projects for parades, but not for mass production and entry into the army. They drank a hundred billion rubles, but beautiful parades can be held

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote from hell machine

Kurganets and Boomerang are projects for parades, but not for mass production and entry into the army. They drank a hundred billion rubles, but beautiful parades can be held

They are undergoing tests and refinement, the military was not satisfied with the Boomerang booking, they strengthened it.

[hell machine]

Well, they will strengthen it for another 5 years, and then they will make a new prodigy

[Rustic]

Armament - gun thirty, in all likelihood ... and that's all for now.

Not yet, but now. They showed last year's version with a different combat module, where, in addition to the 30mm cannon, there was also an ATGM with a PKT. Although the PKT is possible here in the niche to the right of the gun. As I understand it, the Belarusians are still thinking about the combat module. Well, or for sale ready to offer various options.

[hector]

In the first version, there was a habitable module from the BMP, now uninhabited of its own design.

[Rustic]

No one argues that these are different modules. I'm talking about the fact that there are at least 2 options, more powerful and simpler. They say there is also a third one, with the module that they put on V1. But this is generally weak perhaps.

[marc75]

Every year I go to the army, the same thing, this is the most meager, some prototypes or completely crazy concepts that will never go into production. The industry cannot present new samples every year, creation is a long process

[Ros 56]

Ours also show a lot of interesting things, but somehow slowly things are going with the introduction into the troops in a practical plane. And so interesting.

[Nastia makarova]

how much MO orders so much the plant and will do it, it’s not a problem to make 100 Armat only expensive and MO is not needed yet

[User_neydobniu]

it's not a problem to make 100 Armat only expensive and MO is not needed yet

Well, at least the Moscow Region still needs to defend the territory of Russia, otherwise it will suddenly be expensive ...

[Nastia makarova]

MO is more visible what is needed

[User_neydobniu]

MO is more visible what is needed

But who argues, in case something happens - the salvation of drowning people is the work of the drowning people themselves. And then they decided that they should rely on MO ...

[hagen]

Quote from: User_neydobniu

Well, at least the Moscow Region still needs to defend the territory of Russia, otherwise it will suddenly be expensive ...

MO is not an independent subject of politics. It is not for him to decide what is expensive for defense and what is not. There is a state with its own institutions of power. So it decides how much you can pay for an armored personnel carrier or Armata, and for which batch of vehicles its economy will pull so that the "army" does not rebel ...

[Arkady007]

If our components need to think hard.

[Two]

You won’t spoil the Old Man! They won't let a good thing be dragged into the bureaucracy!

[Cat Alexandrovich]

"The vehicle is capable of engaging in battle against enemy armored vehicles"...
Found something to brag about! Enter into anything and I can. The main thing is not to join the battle, but to win it!

[Glory1974]

gun 30 mm, standard. Why didn't they put it in a casing to increase accuracy? the Ukrainians did it, but we and the Belarusians did not, although on the BMD-4 it is paired with the main gun and hits more accurately.

[hell machine]

Belarus has a chance - to make, for example, armored trucks (or at least to withstand simple mines). There is a chance to make money on the military-industrial complex, objectively speaking.
I hope our pot-bellied generals at least guess to buy military equipment from Belarus

[Rustic]

They have those. A few dozens. 4 armor protection class.

[hell machine]

They look like Tigers, but if the protection is good, then I'm ONLY FOR buying and buying them!

[Normann]

Another baba-mobile))

[Paul Siebert]

Looks very worthy!

[Paul Siebert]

On the topic of Belarus.
Yesterday I was drawn to old Soviet films.
I reviewed the film-tale "City of Masters", filmed at Belorusfilm.
Suddenly it hit - this is the story of the struggle of the Belarusian people against the Nazis ...
Live and learn...

[SaLaR]

Good movie, loved it when I was a kid.

[Eug]

What is a weak description? Neither weapons and armor, nor the power and type of engine ... or did I not see something?

[Radical]

Quote: max702

It will not take off, like all the crafts of the military-industrial complex of Belarus .. Another craft in the spirit of "Pirana" with an incomprehensible purpose ..

Yeah, only our PGRKs are mounted on what chassis?

[Normann]

He apparently does not know about the MZKT.

[IVZ]

Belarusians have excellent tractors and off-road trucks, optics, electronics and remote-controlled installations. I think the armor turned out or it will work. And by the way, cooperation within the framework of some projects, at least this would not hurt.

[Sedoy]

something article about nothing at all ...
where are the performance characteristics, what is the armament, the number of troops, the durability of the armor (what caliber does it hold), etc.

[Olfred]

Belarusian "Boomerang" looks like.

In addition, the vehicle is capable of engaging in battle against enemy armored vehicles.

Something ATGMs are not visible, although there may be sub-caliber for 30 mm ...
Too little information, stupid picture, think as you want in short

[Dkuznecov]

Something in the NWO, no one really swam through the rivers.
we repair all bridges or ferry crossings
we use with fords.
And I think we have a lot of waterfowl equipment.
Apparently, it doesn’t swim very well, and it doesn’t shoot / protect well.
Yes, by the way.

[IVZ]

Amphibious armored vehicles are by no means boats, but they are able to overcome water obstacles if necessary and with a favorable arrangement of stars. Bridges and crossing facilities are more reliable. In addition, fuel consumption increases many times afloat, and there may not be a tanker nearby.

[Zaurbek]

This is how the BTR-82 of a healthy and not rich person should look like ......

[alex aircraft]

The composition of the weapons is not indicated. And again floating. It's time to abandon this option in favor of strengthening the armor. Where did the dill cross the rivers by swimming? only pontoons.

[IVZ]

Yes, the world does not end with dill. In general, fashion has gone in the West - the car floats in stock, with additional. armor sets (starting from some mass) lose buoyancy. Those. provides a choice depending on the situation.