Nuclear submarines of the project 955 "Borey"

35
2 November 1996 of the year in the city of Severodvinsk solemnly laid the first (both in our country and in the world) atomic strategic submarine belonging to the 4 generation. The new strategic missile submarine was named "Yuri Dolgoruky". Research in the field of missile submarines belonging to the new 4-th generation, began in the USSR in 1978 year. The direct development of the submarine of the 955 project (the Borey code) was carried out by the Rubin Central Design Bureau, the chief designer of the project was V. N. Zdornov. Active work began at the end of the 1980s. At this point, the global situation has changed, which left a certain imprint on the appearance of the new submarine. In particular, it was decided to abandon the exotic layout and gigantic dimensions possessed by the Shark PLA, returning to the “classical” scheme.

According to the original plans, the new submarine rocket carrier planned to equip the missile system created by the "Makeevskoy" firm. The main armament of the boat was to become powerful solid-fuel missiles "Bark", equipped with a new system of inertial-satellite targeting, which would significantly improve the accuracy of shooting. But a series of unsuccessful rocket test launches and meager funding forced the designers to reconsider the composition of the missile carrier’s missile weapons. In 1998, at the Moscow Institute of Heating Engineering (MIT), which previously specialized in designing strategic ground-based ballistic solid-fuel missiles (including the Kurier, Pioneer, Topol, and Topol-M missiles), as well as anti-submarine missiles systems (the famous "Medvedka"), work began on the creation of a completely new missile system, which is known as the "Bulava". This complex in terms of the accuracy of defeating targets and the ability to overcome enemy missile defense must surpass the American counterpart - Trident II.
Nuclear submarines of the project 955 "Borey"

The new naval missile is quite unified with the intercontinental ballistic missile Topol-M, which is in service with the RVSN, but is not a direct modification. Significant differences in the ground and sea-based features do not allow the development of a universal rocket that would meet the requirements of the Strategic Missile Forces and the Navy to the same extent. The new sea-based missile P-30 "Bulava" according to various sources is capable of carrying, from 6 to 10, individual-targeting nuclear units that have the ability to maneuver in pitch and yaw. The total missile weight dropped is 1 150 kg. The maximum launch range is 8 000 km, which is enough to hit almost all points in the United States with the exception of southern California and Florida. At the same time, during the last test launch, the missile overcame 9 100 km.



According to existing plans for the modernization of underwater fleet Russia, the SSBN of project 955 Borey should become one of the 4 types of submarines that will be put into service. At one time, one of the features of the Soviet and then the Russian fleet was the use of dozens of various modifications and types of submarines, which significantly complicated their repair and operation.

Currently, between the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation and USC - United Shipbuilding Corporation signed a contract to develop a modified version of SSBN Ave. 955A "Borey". The amount of the contract for the development of boats amounted to 39 billion rubles. The construction of submarines of the 955A project will be carried out in Severodvinsk at PO Sevmash. Submarines of the new project will have a Bulava 20 SLBM and an advanced set of computing facilities.

History creations and design features

Since the end of the 80-s, the submarine of the 955 project was designed as a two-shaft SSBN, similar in design to the 667 series submarines of the BDRM Dolphin with a reduced height of the mines of ballistic missiles for the Bark missile system. Under this project, a submarine with a serial number 1996 was laid in 201. In 1998, the decision was made to abandon the Bark SLBM in favor of creating a new Bulava solid-fuel missile with different dimensions.

This decision led to the redesign of the submarine. At the same time, it became clear that the submarine could not be built and put into operation within a reasonable time frame in the face of reduced funding and the collapse of the USSR. The collapse of the USSR led to the cessation of deliveries of specific grades of metal-roll produced by Zaporozhye Steel Foundry, which turned out to be on the territory of independent Ukraine. At the same time, when creating boats, it was decided to use the groundwork for unfinished submarines of the 949A Antey and 971 Shchuka-B projects.
The movement of the submarine is carried out using a single-shaft propulsion system with propulsion qualities.

Similar to the 971 “Pike-B” submarine-launched missile carriers, the new submarine had retractable nasal horizontal rudders with flaps, as well as two reclining thrusters that increased its maneuverability. Submarines of the Borey project are equipped with a rescue system - a rescue pop-up camera that can accommodate the entire crew of the submarine. The rescue chamber is located in the boat hull behind the SLBM launchers. In addition, the KNU-5H-600 class 4 life rafts is on the submarine missile carrier.

The hull of the submarine project 955 "Borey" has a two-hull design. Most likely, the durable hull of the boat is made of steel with a thickness of up to 48 mm and indicators of yield strength 100 kgf / sq. Mm. The submarine hull is assembled using the block method. The equipment of the submarine is mounted inside its hull in depreciation blocks on special shock absorbers, which are part of the general construction system of a two-stage damping system. Each of the shock-absorbing blocks is isolated from the submarine hull with the help of rubber-cord pneumatic shock absorbers. The bow end of the cutting deck PLA is made with a slope forward, this is done in order to improve the flow.

The hull of the submarine is covered with a special rubber anhydroacoustic coating, it is also likely that active means of noise reduction are used in its design. According to A. A. Dyachkov, general director of the TsBB Rubin, the submarines of the Borey 955 project are 5 times less noisy than the Antey’s 949A or the Schuka-B 971 submarines.

Hydroacoustic armament of the submarine is represented by the Irtysh-Amfora-Borey MGK-600B - a single automated digital GAK, which combines in its pure sense as GAK itself (echo direction finding, noise-finding, target classification, GA-communication, detection of GA-signals), so are all hydroacoustic stations of the so-called “small acoustics” (measurement of the speed of sound, measurement of ice thickness, mine detection, detection of torpedoes, search for wormwood and divorces). It is assumed that the range of this complex will surpass the SJC of American submarines of the “Virginia” type.

A nuclear power plant (NPI) is installed on the submarine, most likely with a VM-5 thermal water neutron or pressurized-water reactor or similar with a power of about 190 MW. The reactor uses a control and protection system PUF - "Aliot". According to unconfirmed information so far, the new generation NPI will be installed on the boats of this project. A single-shaft steam-turbine steam-turbine unit with a main turbo-gear unit OK-9ВМ or similar with improved damping and power approximately 50 000 hp is used for movement of the submarine.

To improve maneuverability, the submarine of the 955 project “Borey” is equipped with 2-me thrusters two-speed propulsion electric motors PG-160, each with an 410 power of hp. (according to other data, power in 370 hp). These electric motors are located in the advanced columns in the rear part of the submarine.

The main armament of the boat are solid propellant ballistic missiles R-30 "Bulava", created by the Moscow Institute of Heat Engineering. Shipboard military launch complex (KBSK) was established in the GRTs them. Makeeva (city of Miass). On the first boats of the 955 "Borey" project will be located on the 16 SLBM "Mace", on the boats of the 955 project their number will be increased to 20 units.

In addition to missiles, the boat has 8 nasal 533-mm torpedo tubes (maximum 40 torpedoes, rocket-torpedoes, or self-transporting mines). USET-80 and UGST torpedoes, Waterfall missiles can be used onboard the boat. There is also a 6 disposable non-rechargeable 533-mm REPS-324 “Barrier” launchers for launching hydroacoustic countermeasure facilities, which are located in the superstructure (similar to the 971 project boats). Ammunition - 6 self-propelled sonar countermeasures: MG-104 "Throw" or MG-114 "Beryl".

As of May 2011, it was known that, starting with the 4 submarine hull of the Borey 955 submarine (conventionally Ave 09554), the hull shape of the boat will change, which will become closer to the originally intended appearance of the submarines. Probably, these boats will be built without the use of the reserve, which remained from the submarine pr 971. In the nasal compartments of SSBN it is planned to abandon the two-body. Along with the bow antennas of the Irkysh-Amphora State Joint-Stock Company, the long-drawn case antennas of the SAC will be used. Torpedo tubes are planned to move closer to the center of the hull and make them airborne. The front rudders are going to move to the wheelhouse. The number of mines is planned to be increased to 20, with a decrease in the size of the permeable superstructure in the area of ​​mines. The power plant, which will be unified with other submarines of the 4 generation, will also be modernized.

TTX boats:

Crew - 107 people (including 55 officers);
Maximum length –170 m;
Width is greatest - 13,5 m;
Draft hull average - 10 m;
Underwater displacement - 24 000 t;
Displacement overhead - 14 720 t;
Submerged speed - 29 knots;
Surface speed - 15 knots;
Maximum immersion depth –480 m;
Immersion depth working - 400 m;
The autonomy of swimming - 90 days;
Armament - 16 PU missiles P-30 "Bulava", on the boats of the project 955А - 20PU, 8х533 torpedo tubes.

Information sources:
-http: //militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-338.html
-http: //vadimvswar.narod.ru/ALL_OUT/TiVOut9801/SuRub/SuRub075.htm
-http: //ru.wikipedia.org
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    17 October 2012 08: 29
    Good peacemaker. One can say one of the last legacies of the USSR.
    1. +3
      17 October 2012 09: 14
      if the series goes, it's time to work out a replacement!
      1. +8
        17 October 2012 09: 40
        Quote: Civil
        if the series goes, it's time to work out a replacement!


        Most likely, there are many developments. The main thing now is to restore to the normal production cycle the production of such over complex military facilities. It’s no secret, after all, that contractors from almost the entire union worked for the fleet and many elements of the production system were lost and were carefully destroyed. So it’s not yet fat, the main thing is that the possibility of developing and building such ships is preserved.
        1. +1
          18 October 2012 00: 30
          For some reason, the whiners keep silent about this reason and start yelling: - "Chief! Everything is lost! ...".
        2. qwerty_zxc
          -1
          31 October 2012 00: 25
          Quote: Sakhalininets
          Most likely, there are many developments.

          Learn to write in Russian, cattle. And I will disappoint you, for a long time there are no developments
  2. Director
    -1
    17 October 2012 09: 50
    The boat is wonderful, if only they build more. And then wet pants from our potential "friends" are guaranteed. laughing
    1. +1
      17 October 2012 12: 30
      START-3 it all comes down to
      And so we will replace the BRDM and we will be happy.
      1. 0
        17 October 2012 13: 20
        I apologize, I did not quite understand. What rests on strategic offensive arms?
        1. 0
          17 October 2012 14: 28
          The number of media of a particular type.
          1. +4
            17 October 2012 15: 31
            Yes, it seems like not quite. item 2. Article 2 states: "Each of the Parties has the right to independently determine the composition and structure of its strategic offensive arms."
            There are only general limits where warheads are deployed - not so fundamentally. Deployed carriers - 700 units for deployed ICBMs, deployed SLBMs and deployed heavy bombers;

            deployed warheads - 1550 units for warheads on deployed ICBMs, warheads on deployed SLBMs and nuclear warheads counted for deployed heavy bombers;
  3. +2
    17 October 2012 10: 56
    they would still have surface support, but the base

    And again, two-hull architecture ... request
    1. Snake4
      +1
      17 October 2012 12: 38
      Judging by the last paragraph, design, too, is gradually moving to a single-hull layout (or rather a half-hull, by analogy with Yasenem), but apparently it will not work in full in the near future, many historical technical solutions just can not be redesigned for 1 building.
      In general, the article describes a major change in the initial design. I am afraid that the rejection of unification of the entire series will again be a sore spot and will cause many problems in operation. And the first boats will have to be used rather in experimental mode.
      1. 0
        17 October 2012 13: 04
        Most likely, there will be problems with unification. But there is nothing new here. BDRM-we also grew up from "Navagi". And the first boats of the 667th project were not experimental - they all served. So it will be here.
      2. 0
        23 February 2014 10: 36
        They would have upgraded better than the Sharks and built in gigantic numbers. Two strong hulls and extremely powerful solid fuel rockets are a magnitude.
  4. 0
    17 October 2012 11: 26
    In particular, it was decided to abandon the exotic layout and the gigantic dimensions possessed by the Akula submarine, returning to the "classical" scheme.

    Umm .. no one tell me why? And it is also desirable pros and cons of different layouts.
    1. +1
      17 October 2012 11: 31
      how why? in the article it is not for nothing that it says about gigantic dimensions. "Sharks" ("Typhoons") in the fleet were called "water carriers" because of the huge reserves of water that they had to take into the tanks for immersion. With about 50000 tons of full displacement, such a ship was too noticeable. And besides, it did not justify the hopes imposed, because it was created as a counterweight to the Ohio, but on the Ohio there are 24 missiles, and on the Shark - 20. And the displacement of the Ohio is about 19 tons, and therefore it is more difficult to notice it. As for the layout itself - the placement of the missile compartment behind the wheelhouse or in front of it - in my opinion there is not much difference. But this is IMHO.
      1. 0
        28 November 2016 16: 16
        Quote: Delta
        "Sharks" ("Typhoons") in the fleet were called "water carriers" because of the huge reserves of water that they had to take into the tanks for immersion.

        They were called, if anything, by a CHLENOVOZ and Brezhnev’s yacht, that’s a fact, since there WAS NOT MISSION UNDER THIS MIRACLE OF TECHNOLOGY
    2. Snake4
      0
      17 October 2012 12: 41
      I will add one more commonplace - a shark is sooo expensive. Today we cannot afford such projects. Yes, and they are not needed in principle.
      Its cost / effectiveness is much lower than boats of smaller displacement.
      1. galeo88
        0
        19 October 2012 11: 26
        "Typhoon" was built for a guaranteed retaliatory strike, since they were on duty only under the ice where nothing could be reached. But they knew how to emerge from under the thick ice, "Boreus" is too tough.
        1. 0
          23 October 2012 15: 28
          Nonsense! In August 1981, we broke the pack ice in 667B K-447 and fired two missiles at the Kura training ground. So really "Borey" will not be able to?
  5. NickitaDembelnulsa
    +1
    17 October 2012 12: 24
    The boat is certainly successful, it is nice to see how our fleet is developing from Giant, noisy, and noticeable Sharks, to these Boreas.
  6. +1
    17 October 2012 14: 52
    the shape of the hull of the boat will change, which will become closer to the originally conceived appearance of the submarines. It is likely that these boats will be built without using the backlog that remained from the submarine, Project 971. In the bow compartments of the SSBN it is planned to abandon the double hull. Along with the nose antennas of the SJSC “Irtysh-Amphora”, long-drawn hull antennas of the SAC will be used. Torpedo tubes are planned to move closer to the center of the hull and make them airborne. The front depth wheels are about to move to the wheelhouse. The number of start-up mines is planned to be increased to 20, with a decrease in the size of the permeable superstructure in the area of ​​the mines. Undergo modernization and power plant- i.e. in fact this is another project coming out laughing
    1. 0
      17 October 2012 16: 40
      I got the same opinion .. another project, a different profile ..))
  7. 0
    17 October 2012 17: 30
    Actually, Boreas are called orders 201, 202, 203, built according to project 955. With order 204, I start (hopefully) a series with the code 955A. Bookmark 204 has already taken place. http://stav.kp.ru/daily/25924/2875142/
  8. 0
    17 October 2012 19: 51
    possessing propulsive qualities.



    Dear experts! And what is it?
    1. +2
      17 October 2012 22: 11
      this is also called - walkability. The ratio between the power spent during the movement of the vessel, its size and speed. In other words, the ability to develop a given speed with minimum engine power
      1. 0
        17 October 2012 23: 18
        Big mercy!
  9. 0
    17 October 2012 20: 49
    I’m not special about submarines, but I know one thing: they first develop ammunition, and based on its characteristics, only then weapons. Four years ago, on TV, there was information that there was a graphite filament production workshop in the Institute of Heat Engineering in Moscow, which is the main component the thermal protection of the warheads of the missiles was sold to some commercial structure that was planning to make a shopping center on the basis of the workshop. We showed how the workers of the workshop were expelled, can anyone know what ultimately happened to this workshop? So if everything remained in the hands of commerce, then what can we talk about. The defense enterprise was sold on the basis of privatization developed by the CIA, and we are trending about something that we are great and smart. Land to peasants, water to sailors, factories to workers, thieves is a prison!
  10. 0
    17 October 2012 21: 24
    Whoever would say anything, but I like Borey with his Mace. A good submarine and rocket, despite all the failures that were in the past.
    1. 0
      23 February 2014 10: 45
      I can’t remember - but how many failures did the Boreans have in the past?
  11. Hard
    0
    17 October 2012 21: 32
    Please tell me, how many total Boreev are in the plans?

    And Ashen, if possible?
    1. January
      +1
      17 October 2012 22: 29
      And why do you need this? ...
    2. +1
      17 October 2012 22: 58
      different numbers were called. Boreev from 8 to 10, Ash 6-9
  12. Karish
    +3
    18 October 2012 12: 19
    The article is interesting, I would like to draw attention to some inaccuracies
    On November 2, 1996, in the city of Severodvinsk, in a solemn ceremony, the first (both in our country and in the world) nuclear strategic submarine belonging to the 4th generation was laid

    The fourth generation includes the American * Sivulf * and * Virginia * that go since the 80s. Now in the United States are testing and research and development, the 5th generation.
    This complex in terms of accuracy in hitting targets and the ability to overcome enemy missile defense should surpass the American counterpart - Trident II.

    It may of course surpass it when it flies, but the Tridents are almost 25 years old. It was adopted in 1990.
    As of May 2011, it was known that, starting from the 4th hull of submarines of project 955 Borey (conditionally project 09554), the shape of the hull of the boat will change, which will become closer to the originally conceived appearance of the submarines. Probably, these boats will be built without using the backlog that remained from the submarine, Project 971. In the bow compartments of the SSBN planned to abandon the two-hull

    It's time to abandon the legacy of the German submarine school. Double-shell automatically leads to an increase in wetted surfaces, volumes, and therefore noise.

    The main direction of the development of nuclear submarines (in the 5th) generation is noise reduction, the reactor does not require recharging for the entire period of the boat district (this is already in Sivulfs and Virginia), the maximum automation and modularity of weapons (this can already be traced in Virginia) when one SLBM is replaced by a cartridge with 6 cruise missiles.
    1. 0
      28 October 2012 21: 51
      Quote: Karish
      "On November 2, 1996, in the city of Severodvinsk, the first (both in our country and in the world) nuclear strategic submarine belonging to the 4th generation was laid down in a solemn atmosphere"
      The fourth generation includes the American * Sivulf * and * Virginia * that go since the 80s. Now in the United States are testing and research and development, the 5th generation.


      And the word "strategic" doesn't mean anything to you?)
  13. Lucky
    0
    18 October 2012 13: 11
    More to us such monsters to sleep more calmly)
  14. 0
    15 July 2015 15: 49
    And yet she is beautiful !!!! These forms ..... and the fighting character ....

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"