Chemical Weapons Convention and its implementation

19

155 mm American-made artillery shells loaded with mustard gas

In 1997, the Convention on the Prohibition of Chemical weapons. In accordance with this document, the countries of the world had to stop the development, production and use of chemical warfare agents, as well as begin the disposal of accumulated stocks. The last problem is still being solved. Some states have already completely got rid of their CW, while others are still continuing this work.

Legal framework


In 1925, based on the experience of the First World War, the so-called. The Geneva Protocol prohibited the combat use of asphyxiating and poisonous gases, as well as bacteriological agents. At the same time, the Protocol did not prohibit the development, production and stockpiling of such weapons. This feature of the document contributed to the active development of the direction of weapons of mass destruction.



New measures in this direction were taken only a few decades later. As a result, at the end of 1992, the General Assembly approved a new Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). In early 1993, it was opened for signing. The Convention entered into force in April 1997, after signing and ratification by 65 states.

To date, the CWC has been ratified by 189 countries. North Korea, Egypt and South Sudan did not sign this document, and Israel, having signed one of the first in 1993, has not yet ratified it.


Warhead M190 rocket complex MGR-1 Honest John. Enclosure holds spherical sarin containers

The Convention introduces a complete ban on the production and use of chemical weapons of all types. It is also required to eliminate the capacity for its production and destroy the accumulated reserves. International cooperation is envisaged for the fulfillment of these tasks and inspections through the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

In accordance with the original plan, the process of complete destruction of the accumulated CW stocks was supposed to take about 10 years. So, for the first 3 years, by April 2000, it was planned to carry out the first stage of work and utilize 1% of world reserves. The second stage, lasting 2 years, provided for the destruction of another 19%. By April 2004, they were going to get rid of 45% of CW, and the complete destruction of stocks was to be completed in 2007. At the same time, the extension of the established deadlines was not ruled out.

Accumulated stocks


By joining the Convention, the countries transmitted to the OPCW information on existing production facilities and accumulated stockpiles of chemical weapons. Inspections were also carried out to verify the declared data and to exclude the concealment of production facilities or weapons.

It was reported that 14 countries had their own production of chemical weapons, and one of them was not named in open documents. A total of 65 enterprises operated in this industry. By 2007, all these productions were stopped. In addition, most of them were liquidated or rebuilt for other needs. A few years later, the remaining enterprises also ceased to exist in their former form.


A serviceman of the Russian troops of the RKhBZ conducts a training decontamination of equipment

A total of more than 8,7 million chemical munitions, containers and other means of storing and delivering weapons have accumulated in the arsenals of the States Parties to the Convention. The total amount of poisonous substances reached 70 thousand tons. Countries were required to destroy or process these stocks, either on their own or with foreign assistance.

Mission accomplished


Albania was the first to report the complete destruction of its CW stockpiles. It did not have its own production facilities, and the reserves amounted to only 16,7 tons. By the middle of 2007, these CWAs were completely disposed of. At the end of next year, the completion of the disposal of chemical weapons in an unnamed state was announced. Presumably, it was South Korea, which had unknown stocks. In the spring of 2009, India completely destroyed its reserves.

At the time of the signing of the CWC in 1993, Russia had the world's largest stocks of chemical weapons - almost 40 thousand tons of poisonous substances of all categories and hundreds of thousands of chemical munitions of various types. Due to organizational and financial difficulties, the preparation and destruction of these stocks was delayed. Nevertheless, by the beginning of the XNUMXs, enterprises for the disposal of chemical weapons began to operate.

By the end of the decade, Russian industry had successfully destroyed up to half of all stocks, and in 2014-15. reached the 80% level. On September 27, 2017, the last domestic chemical projectile was destroyed. Russia has fully complied with its obligations under the CWC, which was confirmed by the regulatory authorities.


In 2012, Syria acknowledged that it had some CW stockpiles. In the autumn of 2013, after provocations by illegal groups, Damascus agreed to destroy the existing stocks. CWAs were removed and disposed of on special vessels in neutral waters. In addition, the state has ratified the CWC. Works on the destruction of the CW stockpile were completed in mid-2014.

Work continues


The United States was the second largest CW - during the Cold War, they accumulated approx. 31,5 thousand tons of various means and a large number of delivery vehicles for them. American enterprises for the processing and disposal of CW began to work in the late nineties, almost immediately after the entry into force of the CWC. However, the process of destroying weapons encountered various difficulties and dragged on.

At the end of 2001, the US reported the destruction of a quarter of its stockpiles. In 2005, they reported breaking the 40% threshold. Five years later, the share of destroyed stocks doubled. In the tenth years, the rate of recycling fell sharply, and the estimated completion date was postponed several times. As a result, approx. 3% of available stocks. They plan to complete their destruction next year.

In the past, Iraq produced and used its CW. However, after the Gulf War, as part of a separate UN program, production was stopped, and the accumulated stocks began to be destroyed. Until the end of the nineties, most of the CWA was successfully disposed of. However, part of the ammunition and substances remained in the arsenals.

Iraq officially joined the CWC only in 2009, already under the new government. Then it was reported about the presence of several inactive industries and the remnants of previously accumulated stocks of weapons. The possibility of their destruction was considered, but no real plans were drawn up and work did not begin. According to known data, part of the Iraqi CW is still in storage and is waiting to be dealt with.


In 2004, Libya reported on its CWA stockpiles. At that time she was ok. 24 tons of weapons, a large number of components for their production and the necessary enterprises. In the future, it was planned to draw up and launch a recycling program. However, before the civil war of 2011, these plans could not be fulfilled. As a result, the Libyan stockpiles of chemical weapons have not yet been destroyed, and the situation in the country leads to known risks.

Successes and challenges


As we can see, the Chemical Weapons Convention, which entered into force in 1997, turned out to be the most successful and effective document of its kind. Unlike previous protocols and declarations aimed at combating CW, it actually led to the launch of real programs to stop production and destroy accumulated stocks.

To date, the vast majority of declared chemical weapons have been destroyed. In particular, Russia, the largest owner, got rid of its reserves. The country with the second largest reserves is completing their processing. The implementation of such work has noticeably fallen out of the original schedule, but the tasks set are still being fulfilled.

Nevertheless, certain difficulties, problems and challenges remain in the field of chemical weapons. As a consequence, toxic agents may still pose some threat of a military or humanitarian nature.

First of all, there are risks associated with the remaining stocks of chemical weapons. So, in the USA, Iraq, Libya and other countries, hundreds of tons of CWA have not yet been destroyed. Improper storage conditions can lead to spills, contamination of the area, or weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. Both scenarios are very dangerous.


However, the complete destruction of known CW stocks does not provide complete protection against possible attacks. As the Syrian experience shows, the simplest and most accessible chemicals, such as chlorine, can be used to provoke and attack civilians. We should also remember the Japanese extremist sectarians, who under artisanal conditions were able to produce a large amount of sarin.

Syrian events and story with the notorious "Novichok" show another characteristic modern problem. The OPCW and other institutions or mechanisms of particular importance to security and stability may be controlled by specific countries and used for political purposes. At the same time, objectivity suffers, and prerequisites for new threats are created.

Responsible direction


Thus, the topic of chemical weapons and chemical warfare agents is still relevant. The process of destroying such weapons and their means of delivery continues, although it is seriously behind the original schedule. New programs for the chemical disarmament of new countries are also drawn up and implemented.

With all this, a number of characteristic problems and risks remain, in connection with which the relevant international organizations continue to work. In addition, CWC member countries should take an active part in these processes. By paying due attention to the destruction of chemical weapons, they will help achieve common goals, as well as protect themselves from provocations or attacks of various kinds.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    12 August 2022 16: 12
    The problem is really terrible!
    When the elimination of CWA stockpiles is completed, everyone will become calmer.
    1. -1
      12 August 2022 16: 39
      Come on. Compared to nuclear weapons, chemical weapons are child's play.
      1. 0
        12 August 2022 16: 45
        Come on, compared to the explosion of a supervolcano or whatever "messenger from space" the size of a stadium, all our weapons, although scary, are not so radical, if you look at it.
        Although, our earthly eggheads can still invent, create, and ... I don’t even want to think about it.
        1. 0
          12 August 2022 16: 52
          I'm not comparing any supervolcanoes or supernovas. I am comparing two types of WMD. And the power for the purpose of nuclear weapons and chemical weapons is incomparable, and the price is quite comparable, because. storage and subsequent disposal of CW (it quickly loses its properties) are very expensive. But for special applications, it is very suitable. My IMHO, they got into this convention in vain. On the other hand, then there was no money to maintain an arsenal of 40 thousand tons, and even more so to dispose of it.
  2. -1
    12 August 2022 16: 12
    All these conventions are not observed, I don’t think it’s necessary to enter into them, it’s already a rule that our opponents violate them
  3. -2
    12 August 2022 16: 41
    They might as well not destroy everything. Like a weapon of mass destruction for members of the nuclear club, this is a suitcase without a handle. But the limited number for use in special operations is fully justified.
  4. +1
    12 August 2022 18: 39
    I think that all the leading countries have retained their potential. These are either binary substances that individually will not fall under the convention, or the ability to quickly organize production in civilian industries.
    1. -1
      13 August 2022 18: 33
      Binary components fall under the convention. All production facilities that fell under the convention were dismantled in accordance with the convention and in the presence of observers.

      Well, it’s worth adding that binary weapons are an absolute cut. Binar is much more expensive than unitary weapons and loses at least 20-30% in terms of efficiency.
  5. 0
    13 August 2022 15: 20
    The Americans have long begun to sabotage the process of destroying their CW. One question is why those who drew up the contract did not provide for the simplest. This would be the destruction of CW stocks in stages, with control at each stage. Therefore, now the United States has part of the CW, but we do not. And the process of destruction is shelved by them so far. I'm not sure that they stopped research into the development of binary weapons, which is very, very difficult to control.
    1. -1
      13 August 2022 18: 39
      You will probably be very surprised if you find out that, as such, no one is looking for CW, or rather OV, for at least 20-30 years. Just like no one has been developing binary weapons for 30 years already, due to the meaninglessness of the binary. Maybe only some North Korea is still playing around. The only thing that has been improved until recently is delivery methods, but we won’t talk about that, because. slippery topic.

      As for the OVs themselves, absolutely everything was tested during the time of the living Kuntsevich. No more OV will ever be invented, because it is simply impossible - within the limits of suitable molecular weights, everything was sorted out.
  6. 0
    13 August 2022 15: 50
    Our leaders have fulfilled (more precisely, fulfilled). And that's it.
    1. -1
      13 August 2022 18: 49
      Come on, the Yankees also destroyed 90%. The gag happened, as always, because of funding, and not because of malicious intent. The remaining reserves are very old, i.e. RW has already lost the required properties, and the ammunition itself is unsafe to use, especially rockets with sarin. So the Yankees now have a suitcase without a handle, dangerous, useless, and demanding a lot of money. that you don't want to spend.

      If you know English, you can see here how they are doing with this at the moment

      https://www.peoacwa.army.mil/destruction-progress/
      1. 0
        13 August 2022 22: 37
        You can always refer to finance. Only at the same time they found money for the destruction of our submarine fleet. And a lot of money. So to believe the States is not to respect yourself.
        1. -2
          13 August 2022 23: 08
          What does it mean to "believe"? Compliance with the convention was monitored by mutual checks. Just like START.
          1. 0
            14 August 2022 06: 06
            You don't have to turn on the fool. I'm talking about the fact that they do not have enough money to eliminate everything.
            1. -2
              14 August 2022 07: 54
              They share money. Gags like this arise precisely on the financial issue - who will pay for the banquet. Initially, they made a project, approved financing, and began work. Along the way, there was an increase in the cost of work. The contractor asks for additional funding (the matter is serious, the risks are large, a lot of inspectors from sitisi to environmental protection, etc.). The contractor is told to go to hell, we won't give any more money. He weighs the risks and, having come to the conclusion that they are too great, stupidly merges or freezes the process. And the drag begins, the government gets involved ... In the United States, almost all contractors are private, until they agree that it would be beneficial for everyone, nothing will be done.

              You don't have to go into conspiracy theories. For provocations in Syria, no one will drain the old sarin from rockets. Just make a new one as much as needed within a couple of days. The old CW, it only pulls the pocket of staffers, and everyone there is interested in liquidating it, but no one wants to leave without profit.
              1. -1
                14 August 2022 16: 29
                Again. Money was found to finance the destruction of our strategic forces. Not private owners, the federal budget. If they wanted to, they also found it to complete the liquidation of their CW. Moreover, the state guaranteed it under the contract.
                Well, and a recent primeo, covid. Trillions were printed just to keep the business going. It didn't cost them anything. But they can’t find millions in XO? Don't make fun of my slippers.
                1. -3
                  14 August 2022 17: 00
                  From the fact that you repeat your nonsense even a third time, they will not cease to be nonsense. Firstly, the program for the elimination of our CW was financed not only by the budget, but also by the Americans. You did not know this, comrade comely? What a shame! Secondly, I have covered the mechanism for the implementation of government contracts with private contractors as an educational program and for free. Study, maybe even understand what.

                  To the bath!
                  1. -1
                    14 August 2022 17: 34
                    And do you know how to read? Or the Chukchi is not a reader, the Chukchi is a writer? I am writing that the States found money to pay for the destruction of both our CW, and our submarines, and our missiles, but there was no money to destroy their CW. What sadness.
                    And as for the mechanisms of contracts, it is determined by the state. And the state can and does make exceptions when and how it needs it. By the way, quite recently the same States (in company with Europe) crossed the sacred law - the inviolability of private property - and did not wince.