The National Guard during the electronic intelligence identified and destroyed the UAV operators of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

In the course of carrying out combat missions in the Donbass, units of the Russian Guard identified and destroyed the operators of Ukrainian unmanned aerial vehicles. This was reported on the website of the Federal Service of the National Guard of Russia.

Soldiers of the Russian Guard, conducting electronic reconnaissance on the territory of the Luhansk People's Republic, spotted and recorded the location of the operators drones Ukrainian nationalists. The received coordinates were sent to the headquarters, and from there to the gunners. All identified targets were hit by Russian artillery, after which the identified activity ceased.

(...) in the course of electronic intelligence, the National Guard recorded the location of 39 operators of nationalist unmanned aerial vehicles. The data was transferred to the command post. As a result of fire damage by artillery, the targets ceased activity

- said in a statement.

Simultaneously with the identification of UAV operators of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the Russian Guard is also engaged in identifying the accumulation of APU equipment, artillery firing positions, strong points, as well as armored vehicles in the interests of the Ministry of Defense. For this, reconnaissance drones are used. In just two weeks, forces and means of aerial optical-electronic reconnaissance detected 55 targets, including Ukrainian Tanks. Since the National Guard does not have heavy equipment, the data is transferred to the military, after which the targets are destroyed.

The coordinates of the targets were transferred to the units of the Russian Ministry of Defense for fire damage. All enemy targets successfully suppressed

- added to the Russian Guard.

Comments

[Flooding]

Soldiers of the Russian Guard, conducting electronic intelligence on the territory of the Luhansk People's Republic, spotted and recorded the location of the drone operators of Ukrainian nationalists

The territory of the LPR seems to be completely controlled.
It is not clear from the text where the enemy was.
If they covered it with artillery, then obviously not on their territory.
It would probably be correct to write not "on the territory of the Lugansk People's Republic", but "from the territory of the Luhansk People's Republic".

[ruha]

I would also like to know what kind of UAVs they controlled. Probably not bayraktars)))

[Alexander Salenko]

And you don't care? Well, they probably covered those who did not indulge in toys, in any case they hit the enemy.

[Flooding]

Quote: Alexander Salenko

And you don't care? Well, they probably covered those who did not indulge in toys, in any case they hit the enemy.

I DO NOT care how the articles about the course of the NWO are written.
I prefer a conscientious attitude to such an important issue.
Readers should understand what is written, and not ask new questions.

[R]

I DO NOT care how articles are written about the course of NWO

Write your article. And we will appreciate.

[Flooding]

Quote from Resident

Write your article. And we appreciate

The conversation is not about the author's article.
And about the news from the Ukrainian front.
Feel the difference buddy.
You don't need any special writing talent.
All you need to do is proofread before posting.

[4ekist]

Russian artillery strikes were inflicted, after which the identified activity ceased.

Well, it has stopped. Maybe they just hid for the time being. If they were caught and banally shot, then the issue with them would be resolved 100%.

[Terenin]

Quote: Flood

The territory of the LPR seems to be completely controlled.

Without "like". Completely controlled.

Quote: Flood

It would probably be correct to write not "on the territory of the Lugansk People's Republic", but "from the territory of the Luhansk People's Republic".

Intelligence involves actions, incl. and in the adjacent territory. The National Guard has its own Intelligence Directorate, and not a frail one.

[Flooding]

Quote: Terenin

Intelligence involves actions, incl. and in the adjacent territory

It's not about intelligence.
Which is just designed to collect information on foreign territory.
And about the correct construction of phrases.

[Terenin]

Quote: Flood

And about the correct construction of phrases.

I am not an expert in evaluating the correctness of the construction of phrases

[Ablet]

Perhaps in his rear too. There is a problem of identifying saboteurs and / or locals with small drones that work for the enemy, identifying our military installations. This can be done, for example, from some forest belt or forest area, which are in abundance in the LPR. A saboteur (spy) picks up a drone for 15-20 minutes and performs reconnaissance, it’s not realistic to get to it on wheels and catch it red-handed during this time, but a few mines from a cornflower completely solve the problem. In the LDNR, it has recently been forbidden to use UAVs by anyone except law enforcement agencies. And the latter most likely also notify the Russian Guard about the use of a drone in any area in order not to receive several deadly surprises.
The article is most likely talking about UAVs in our rear.

[SKVichyakow]

Here are those times. Why the National Guard? And where is the participation of those who should be involved in this?

[Terenin]

Quote: SKVichyakow

Here are those times. Why the National Guard? And where is the participation of those who should be involved in this?

Why don't you like the Russian Guard?

[sabakina]

Gena prYuvet! But isn’t the Russian Guard an analogue of the USSR explosives?

[Terenin]

Quote: sabakina

Gena prYuvet! But isn’t the Russian Guard an analogue of the USSR explosives?

Hi, Vyacheslav!
Almost the same thing, just not sickly enlarged ... Although ..., if we return the number of the Federal Penitentiary Service (and these functions until 2004 dragged the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs), then everything is the same. And, in the trenches of the Internal Troops of the Ministry of Internal Affairs since 1992 (if I'm not mistaken from Fergana)

[Sergej1972]

From 1989-1990.

[Glory1974]

From 1989-1990.

I think, after all, it should be considered from 1986-87, when Karabakh began.

[Sergej1972]

The conflict in the NKAO began in 1988. Although in those days it was possible to solve it. Transfer the Armenian regions of the NKAR to the Armenian SSR, and leave the Azerbaijani ones as part of Azerbaijan, and plus correct the Armenian-Azerbaijani border by transferring the Azerbaijani village councils of Armenia to Azerbaijan. Both Armenians and Azerbaijanis have their own truth in the Karabakh conflict. A solution absolutely satisfying to both sides was not possible then, nor now. The same can be said about Abkhazia. Doesn't want to be part of Georgia - let it be independent. On the other hand, why then forcefully keep the Gali region with a predominantly Georgian population as part of Abkhazia? It is necessary to give the residents of the region the opportunity to choose whether to be in Abkhazia or in Georgia.

[Terenin]

Quote: Sergej1972

From 1989-1990.

Quote: glory1974

I think, after all, it should be considered from 1986-87, when Karabakh began.

Especially

[kytx]

The Russian Guard is rather an analogue of the gendarmerie of the Republic of Ingushetia.

[ANB]

. The Russian Guard is rather an analogue of the gendarmerie of the Republic of Ingushetia.

The gendarmerie of the Republic of Ingushetia is closer to the FSB.

[kytx]

Actually, in the Republic of Ingushetia there was a so-called tsarist secret police. Here it is an analogue of the FSB. And emnip submission she had her own.

[Sergej1972]

It was different in different years. Has been since the 80s. The 19th century Police Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, which dealt with political and state crimes (criminal crimes were the responsibility of the provincial police, subordinate to the police chief and governors), plus security departments in several major cities. Partly civilian officials, partly police officials worked there. There were also provincial and district (in fact, inter-district) gendarme departments. The gendarme corps belonged to the states of the Ministry of War, its ranks were considered to be in the army. But he was operationally subordinate to the Ministry of Internal Affairs. On the one hand, he provided power support to the Police Departments and security departments of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, on the other hand, there were not only power units in the gendarmerie. By the way, the famous Zubatov (who sympathized with the revolutionaries in his youth) was not a colonel. He was an official who held a position equivalent to that of a colonel.

[Glory1974]

The Russian Guard is rather an analogue of the gendarmerie of the Republic of Ingushetia.

The National Guard traces its history from the internal guard corps and internal troops.

[kytx]

Clear.
And your Zolotov prophet ...

[sergey32]

IMHO, Rosgvadia should be engaged in the protection of the rear and control of the liberated territories. Isn't radio reconnaissance the task of the Armed Forces?

[Terenin]

Quote: sergey32

IMHO, Rosgvadia should be engaged in the protection of the rear and control of the liberated territories.

Not only, Sergey . Rosgvradia is an abbreviation. Full title - Troops of the National Guard of the Russian Federation, and in addition to law enforcement tasks, other tasks may be assigned to it by the Supreme Command. And it also has an Intelligence Directorate.

Quote: sergey32

Isn't radio reconnaissance the task of the Armed Forces?

Of course, but, why not help brothers in arms if the National Guard has systems for radio search, interception and analysis of electromagnetic radiation.

[Kesha1980]

Rosgvadia should be engaged in the protection of the rear and control of the liberated territories

And then what should reconnaissance battalions, artillery divisions do,
regional special forces detachments of the Russian Guard? The specifics of the "sharpening" of these units has little to do with the rear. Rather, the 2nd line, sometimes the first - special equipment for urban battles, reconnaissance - ambushes and so on. Even "chemists" with Bumblebees on the balance sheet.
I served in the "vovans" - it differs slightly from the Ministry of Defense in terms of tasks (of course, not in terms of fire damage, but also in this regard - relative to the norms, depending on the enemy).

[Glory1974]

And then what should reconnaissance battalions, artillery divisions do,
regional special forces detachments of the Russian Guard? The specifics of the "sharpening" of these units has little to do with the rear. Rather, the 2nd line, sometimes the first - special equipment for urban battles, reconnaissance - ambushes and so on. Even "chemists" with Bumblebees on the balance sheet.

No, tasks, weapons, states are completely different. Somehow in Chechnya they interacted with paratroopers, they tell us: "Guys, don't be offended, but on our maps we will designate your brigade as a battalion, because the firepower of even our battalion does not reach ."
And the National Guard is not intended for operations in the first line, although sometimes it is used there. But this is categorically wrong, and does not correspond to the classical tactics of the troops.

[Kesha1980]

That's exactly the firepower just the same - relative to the norms. 46 OBron - with me, in the shaggy 2000s. had an artillery division + at least a battery of mortars. Reconnaissance battalion on infantry fighting vehicles, the rest on armored personnel carriers + pokemon. RHBZ battalion (maybe a company, but I remember Bumblebees with them). OISB, a few operational bahts with a rifle. Of course, it’s ridiculous to compare with the landing, because training drives. Plus, the brigade is not standard - it was 13 baht, it seems.
But at the moment - nothing, "they just forgot that they should guard the rear").
But then again - commanders and fighters do not have the same training and training as the landing force and others like them. On the last sentence, I agree.

[Glory1974]

to compare the firepower of BRON VV and motorized rifle (MSBR) you need to know their staff. The state is secret, so there will be no details. But even the artillery division in the 46th brigade had 122 mm, and the MSBR 152 mm, already says a lot.

[Kesha1980]

I agree. But you then compared it with a battalion of the Airborne Forces - they somehow have means of fire destruction that are clearly not large

[Sergej1972]

I heard the opinion that the training of soldiers and officers in the operational units of the explosives, and now the Russian Guard is by no means worse than that of the army.

[Kesha1980]

Officers graduate from command schools. But in my opinion - "the bone is still not the same." When I remember, young flyers arrived. They were first in the so-called "training platoon" for a month and a compressed run in the areas of basic knowledge. According to engineering training (in which I participated, as a living dummy in the Grotto and a demonstrator of some actions in the mine business) - they did not look like ice. Little knowledge. But that was 18 years ago. Again, a lot depends on the poured dough - I'm sure Kadyrov's will be better (against the general background) - the availability of equipment and experience with it decides a lot.

[Sergej1972]

Motorized riflemen and tankers can probably say the same to paratroopers.)

[Vita vko]

Quote: sergey32

Isn't radio reconnaissance the task of the Armed Forces?

Apparently, due to the growth of the terrorist threat from Ukrainian UAVs, the National Guard was for the first time given electronic warfare units with electronic intelligence equipment. From here comes the news.

[Glory1974]

The National Guard, and earlier the internal troops are fighting terrorists. And the terrorists are armed not with revolvers, but with modern weapons, including intelligence and communications equipment. Therefore, for a long time in the structure of the explosives, and now the Russian Guard, there are electronic intelligence units, there is even a RER detachment.

[SKVichyakow]

Quote: Terenin

Quote: SKVichyakow

Here are those times. Why the National Guard? And where is the participation of those who should be involved in this?

Why don't you like the Russian Guard?

It's not about like or dislike. Everyone must do their job. It's good that they know how to do it, it's bad something else ...

[Glory1974]

They are just doing their job, for which they are trained, equipped and prepared.

[Galleon]

But this is an excellent and well-coordinated work of several crews and the commander of the radio intelligence group. Congratulations! Guys, you are a pro! Congratulations and a little proud!
There is such a method - triangulation.

[Carlos Hall]

good hit

[Cat Alexandrovich]

Some strange note, confusing ... People have already asked all questions for it and wishes for clarifications. Is it necessary to submit information?

[iouris]

This is called "specialization". Specialization is good!

[wladimirjankov]

I wonder why the National Guard is doing this and not the army? And why should the coordinates be sent to the headquarters and not immediately to the gunners? After all, this is a waste of time and efficiency. While the information is being transmitted to the headquarters, the operators can change their positions. The battalion commander Khodakovsky is right that a lot needs to be changed in the command structure of the army.

[Sergey Aleksandrovich]

Only at the headquarters they know where the suitable gunners are. Or do you think that artillery data is in the public domain?

[KCA]

And why should the Russian Guard not be engaged in the identification and destruction of UAVs and their operators? For example, over the Crimean bridge, nuclear power plant and other especially important or dangerous objects? It is quite possible that their equipment is designed specifically to detect and destroy small-sized drones, and not impact MALE

[m_silenus]

In the Telega there was a message that seemed to have opened and covered the training center for UAV operators.

[MBRSS]

training center for UAV operators.

this is more like the truth. 39 people can only be at the training camp.
PS Who should not be taken prisoner is the UAV operators.

[Architect]

An article from the category of those when after reading questions arise even more than before reading.

[APASUS]

What did the UAV operators do in one place, the training center was covered?