German MLRS MARS II for the Ukrainian army

36

For several weeks in Germany, the possibility of transferring multiple launch rocket systems to Ukraine was discussed. By now, this issue has been resolved, and MARS II combat vehicles have been sent to the Ukrainian army. However, the value of such assistance is questionable. The German side shipped only three MLRS, which also have limited combat capabilities.

Discussions and deliveries


Back in the spring, the first reports appeared about a possible transfer to the Kyiv regime of MLRS of American design, such as the M270 MLRS. Germany was mentioned among the potential suppliers of such equipment. In theory, she could provide her existing MARS II products - an upgraded and modified version of the American M270 system.



On June 1, the German publication Der Tagesspiegel reported that the German military-political leadership was ready to send its MLRS to Ukraine. The necessary consultations were held with the United States and its defense enterprises, as a result of which a rough plan of action was developed.

According to Der Tagesspiegel, Germany may transfer to the Ukrainian army four MARS II systems, which are registered with the Bundeswehr. They recently underwent modernization at the Krauss-Maffei Wegmann enterprise and have not yet had time to return to the German formations. Now they were proposed to be included in the next aid package. The transfer of equipment was expected by the end of June.


In mid-June, a regular NATO meeting was held at the German Ramstein airbase, during which a new aid package for Ukraine was formed. As a result of the event, it became known that Germany would indeed allocate its MARS II, but only three such machines would be delivered. The exact dates of their shipment were not named.

In the following weeks, a number of foreign MLRS were delivered to Ukraine, but German equipment was not reported until recently. Only on July 26, the German Ministry of Defense officially announced the transfer of three MARS II, several other artillery systems and ammunition for them. MLRS for delivery were indeed taken at the KMW enterprise, which had previously completed their modernization.

Together with MARS II, other MLRS of the M270 family are sent to Ukraine. So, the UK announced the delivery of several machines of the M270B1 version. Three more installations were allocated by Norway. She will hand over the vehicles to the UK, which will send three additional MLRS from its army to the Kyiv regime.

The first reports are already appearing about the appearance of the M270 MLRS in the combat zone and the use of such weapons. At the same time, MARS II, apparently, have not yet reached the front and have not been used. However, it is already clear that only three combat vehicles of this type will not affect the course of battles or the general situation.

European modification


The MARS II multiple launch rocket system is one of the modern options for the development and modernization of the base M270 MLRS. It has a number of characteristic differences and innovations, due to which a certain increase in combat qualities is ensured. At the same time, there are some restrictions.


In 2005, the United States entered service with an upgraded version of the MLRS under the designation M270A1. This MLRS received a new fire control system that allowed the use of guided missiles of the GMLRS line. Based on the M270A1, new modifications were created. For example, the UK received the M270B1 variant with some specific features.

At the beginning of the tenth years, Germany, France and Italy, represented by KMW, Airbus, etc., made their own version of the MLRS. It entered service with the Bundeswehr under the name MARS II (Mittleres Artillerieraketensystem II), the French army uses the designation LRU (Lance-Roquettes Unitaire), and in Italy the MLRS-I (MLRS Improved) index is used.

The production of MARS II / LRU / MLRS-I was carried out by rebuilding the available M270 products with the replacement of the necessary units. Since the beginning of the last decade, Germany has updated 40 combat vehicles out of 158 available. Italy and France have upgraded their entire MLRS fleet - 22 and 13 units. respectively. Now the list of operators is replenished by the Ukrainian army, but only three such MLRS were allocated to it.

Benefits and Limitations


MLRS MARS II is made on the basis of the finished product M270 and retains the original appearance and architecture, as well as all the main components and assemblies. At the same time, some systems that determine combat capabilities and effectiveness have been replaced. The growth of the main combat characteristics is ensured, but with some restrictions.

The "European" project provides for the preservation of the existing chassis with a standard power plant and running gear. A new automatic fire extinguishing system has been introduced at the MLRS for Germany and Italy. In accordance with current environmental regulations, it uses compressed nitrogen.


The basic version of the M270 has hydraulic actuators for the launcher. For MARS II / LRU / MLRS-I, KMW has developed a set of electric drives ELDS. Such drives have higher performance and survivability, as well as easier maintenance.

The main difference between MARS II and the original MLRS lies in the "European fire control system" EFCS developed by Airbus. This MSA ensures the use of missiles of the GMLRS family with a range of approx. 90 km and satellite correction. At the same time, the range of ammunition has been artificially reduced. The developing countries have signed the Convention on Cluster Munitions, and therefore the EFCS does not allow the use of missiles with such equipment.

Predictable future


The German MLRS MARS II just arrived in Ukraine and, probably, have not yet been used. However, it is already clear how they will be used, what this will lead to, and what prospects this technique has. As in the case of other foreign weapons, the results of such "aid" will be very specific and will not help the Kyiv regime in any way.

Once again, we are talking about the delivery of only a few combat vehicles. Three German MLRS, even together with British and Norwegian assistance, will not be enough for full-fledged combat use. However, even these forces are enough for a favorite Ukrainian tactic - single attacks on civilian targets or even on their former colleagues.


MARS IIs are capable of using guided projectiles of the GMLRS family. This increases operating ranges and hit accuracy. At the same time, it is possible to use only missiles with a monoblock warhead. Such charges are more powerful than submunitions for cluster warheads, however, they do not allow covering large area targets. Accordingly, in some cases, MARS II loses in efficiency to other versions of the M270.

It should be noted that GMLRS products, regardless of the payload, are easily detected and hit by existing military air defense systems. At the same time, a small number of MLRS will not allow performing a large salvo that can overload anti-aircraft systems. In addition, an attempt to assemble such a battery will be revealed with an understandable result.

Find and destroy


Thus, from the point of view of the methods of combat use and the efficiency achieved, the “new” MARS II from Germany will not fundamentally differ from the previously received MLRS or HIMARS. They will be used sporadically and to perform volleys of limited size. At the same time, civilian objects will again be chosen as targets - so that any missile that breaks through can cause maximum moral and material damage.

All this means that our troops will have to pay great attention to the air defense of the liberated areas. In addition, work will continue to identify and destroy MLRS and ammunition depots for them. The Russian army has managed to accumulate a lot of experience in this area, and it is already clear what the future holds for the former German MARS II.
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -8
    1 August 2022 16: 14
    Canis femina! The dumbass will play out.
    1. +15
      1 August 2022 16: 38
      It should be noted that GMLRS products, regardless of the payload, are easily detected and hit by existing military air defense systems. At the same time, a small number of MLRS will not allow performing a large salvo that can overload anti-aircraft systems. In addition, an attempt to assemble such a battery will be revealed with an understandable result.

      But on the Antonovsky Bridge they didn’t know about it, or what? Or have they not started there yet?
      1. +13
        1 August 2022 17: 22
        The problem is that they finish off 70 km, and having US / NATO intelligence capabilities + satellites + their own extensive network of informants on the ground (just in the 50-100 km zone) - the covers are very sensitive. Many have already forgotten about the battalion of the 20th division + helicopter pilots and artillerymen, where the divisional commander, two deputy divisions, the commander of the brigade died (there is also the first officially recognized female soldier) or the temporary location of the Sakhalin detachment of the Russian Guard (riot police) with 12x200, including the commander of the detachment, Colonel Oleg Vostrikov.



        Just the bridge is the target that the MLRS should not confidently hit and they do not hit it with the supplied ammunition. Yes, perseverance crushes stones, but it is much more effective and hemorrhoids for the allied forces to work on point targets, where you can put 2-3 packages in a heap.
        1. -14
          1 August 2022 17: 54
          War is a manly, dangerous business. There is no need to press on for pity.
        2. -15
          1 August 2022 19: 18
          Transformers divorced, minus. They don't want to defend their homeland. Or did the Motherland give bad weapons? Or starving? Or shame in the media?
          I understand if it was Dud and Latynina who were downvoted. I don't understand others.
        3. +3
          1 August 2022 20: 47
          Quote: donavi49
          Just the bridge is a target that the MLRS should not confidently hit and they do not hit it with the delivered ammunition

          Purely hypothetically, there is a concrete-piercing 239mm in Korea. True, it is not a fact that the western M142 / 270 have settings for them.
          1. -9
            2 August 2022 07: 11
            3 pieces is a failure, but they promised something ... it will be easier for ours
            1. +11
              2 August 2022 08: 52
              Let me remind you that all the latest troubles with fertilizer warehouses were caused by one Hymars battery, 4 packages. Now there are 2 Hymars batteries (4 packs per salvo) and 3 incomplete M270 batteries (6 packages per salvo).

              Well, take it easy, take it easy.
              1. +1
                2 August 2022 08: 58
                Quote: Negro
                Let me remind you that all the latest troubles with fertilizer warehouses were caused by one Hymars battery, 4 packages. Now there are 2 Hymars batteries (4 packs per salvo) and 3 incomplete M270 batteries (6 packages per salvo).

                Well, take it easy, take it easy.

                I watch some kind of disappointment hovering in the vastness of VO, cheers-patriots will only be minus on the way.
                1. +9
                  2 August 2022 09: 22
                  This disappointment has been around for a long time. "It's all right, beautiful marquise" and before, not everyone was ready to listen. Especially people familiar with the topic.

                  And now, when instead of "blood, sweat and tears," they again sing about the beautiful marquise, some are downright furious.
                  1. +2
                    2 August 2022 09: 31
                    It's very hard to watch this. angry
                  2. -1
                    4 August 2022 21: 06
                    If there are almost 200 people in the brigade. and this is a regiment of 4 divisions of the Buk air defense system, then nothing is clear. In principle, technology could not be operated with such a composition.
  2. +24
    1 August 2022 16: 55
    The author has all the articles like a carbon copy, all the weapons that are supplied to NATO garbage in vegetable oil do not affect anything, we will win. I agree with the latter, but without supplies it would be much faster. And most importantly, the lives of our soldiers could be saved!
    1. +13
      1 August 2022 17: 29
      By the way, the author elegantly emphasizes 3 Mars, while casually recalling 6 M-270V1 from Britain (3 from Boris and 3 British replacing Norwegian ones). Total 9 +/- of the same type of installations. This is 18 packages for 70 km.

      Well, I'm already silent about the standard practice - first for testing, then deliveries or closing the topic, as not effective enough. The same USA has 200+ cars, Norway has not 3, but 12, there are still 9 left and they can replace everything, since they switched to Himarsy. Oh, well, the Germans also have a decent amount of Mars left, it's another matter that they demand the VTG. Well, etc.
      1. +5
        1 August 2022 19: 49
        The British wrote about the training of 200 operators of such MLRS, so you can expect about a hundred of these systems. And what they say about the transfer of 3 installations - well, they work in groups of 3 pieces. These are stand-alone systems, they do not need an RF or storage for charging / refueling. It is not possible for the Flood to count how many of them there really are, 3 or 3X50 groups.
    2. -13
      1 August 2022 17: 42
      Or maybe not faster. The ripe fruit will fall into your hands.
    3. +4
      2 August 2022 08: 13
      My opinion is that Kirill's articles about our weapons are better than those where he describes "useless" Western weapons.
      1. +3
        2 August 2022 12: 02
        Editorial policy, if you don't write properly, they won't let you into the room.
  3. AAC
    +4
    1 August 2022 17: 35
    Yes, even a pack of cartridges is harmful. I hope the supreme understands what he is doing and does it right.
  4. -3
    1 August 2022 18: 23
    Enough to unleash a "big" war?
    In Kyiv, they can’t eat straight - how they want to hit the Crimean bridge.
    1. +5
      1 August 2022 20: 50
      For the Crimean bridge, other missiles are needed. Joe hasn't agreed yet.

      And if he agrees, the bridge is unlikely to be on the first page of the list of goals.
      1. -1
        2 August 2022 22: 48
        Quote: Negro
        And if he agrees, the bridge is unlikely to be on the first page of the list of goals.

        Most likely to zero. Kyiv is at war in the media field. And this is such a win for all wins
        1. +2
          3 August 2022 08: 03
          It seems that the last months should have taught us not to underestimate the enemy, but nothing changes here.

          Hymars are used quite judiciously. When the MGM-140 appears, they will most likely be used primarily against targets that can escape: aviation, fleet, S-400 and Iskander positions. Secondly, headquarters and warehouses. The bridge isn't going anywhere.
          1. +1
            3 August 2022 08: 43
            This is if you look at it from a military point of view. Aze looks not from a military point of view, but from a media point of view. Otherwise, why is it shelling cities and pre-trial detention centers? From a military point of view, there is no point, but how he shot at them and shoots at them.
            1. -1
              3 August 2022 09: 10
              Which cities and which pre-trial detention center?
              1. 0
                3 August 2022 18: 38
                Stakhanov yesterday, and the pre-trial detention center is Yelenovka, 50 dead and 75 wounded Azov. Are you watching the news?
                1. +1
                  3 August 2022 20: 21
                  Quote: ZAV69
                  Are you watching the news?

                  Of course not.
                  Quote: ZAV69
                  Stakhanov yesterday, and the pre-trial detention center is Yelenovka

                  In Stakhanov, according to the statements of the Luhansk People's Republic, 500 thousand dollars of American taxpayers were spent on three grooves, and in Yelenovka, it was not the people who spit on TV about "the Nazis cannot escape retribution", but on the contrary, the Nazis themselves, again on American taxpayer money. Very kind of them.

                  Interesting, yes. Who is there, you said, fighting in the media field? What's on the news about it?
          2. 0
            5 August 2022 13: 26
            <<used primarily against targets that can escape>>
            First of all, these are headquarters and warehouses, and not everything that you wrote first, without warehouses and headquarters they may not run away, they do not interfere with anyone. As soon as the armament and provisions end, they themselves will leave (if possible), and they beat on the bridge so that they cannot leave.
            1. +1
              5 August 2022 16: 36
              Pound on the Crimean bridge so that the RF Armed Forces could not leave? Where, from the Crimea? I do not appreciate the capabilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine so highly.
              1. 0
                5 August 2022 20: 26
                <<To beat on the Crimean bridge so that the RF Armed Forces could not leave? Where, from the Crimea?>>
                Open the map of the Kherson region. On the left bank are the main forces and supplies to the right bank of the Dnieper, where the city of Kherson and the surrounding areas are located, which are under the control of Russian troops. All supplies go through the Antonovsky bridge, through the Kakhovskaya dam and the railway bridge. If they are put out of action, it will be impossible to supply supplies and the military to the right bank, and it will also not be possible to retreat. In addition to the pontoon crossing, which is not very reliable.
                1. 0
                  5 August 2022 22: 47
                  This thread does not discuss the situation with Kherson, but a hypothetical strike on the Kerch bridge. Be careful, please.
                  1. 0
                    6 August 2022 09: 13
                    <<This thread does not discuss the situation with Kherson, but a hypothetical strike on the Kerch bridge. Be careful, please.>>
                    1 discussed in this thread
                    German MLRS MARS II for the Ukrainian army
                    2 I replied to YOUR posts
                    Hymars are used quite judiciously. When the MGM-140 appears, they will most likely be used primarily against targets that can escape: aviation, fleet, S-400 and Iskander positions. Secondly, headquarters and warehouses. The bridge isn't going anywhere.

                    To beat on the Crimean bridge, so that the RF Armed Forces could not leave? Where, from the Crimea? I do not appreciate the capabilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine so highly.

                    I just responded to what you wrote.
                    If you have a different opinion, I'm ready to read it.
                    1. -1
                      6 August 2022 11: 33
                      iouris
                      1 August 2022 18: 23
                      NEW
                      -3
                      Enough to unleash a "big" war?
                      In Kyiv, they can’t eat straight - how they want to hit the Crimean bridge.
                      Reply
                      Quote
                      A complaint
                      Negro
                      Negro
                      1 August 2022 20: 50
                      NEW

                      +5
                      For the Crimean bridge, other missiles are needed. Joe hasn't agreed yet.

                      And if he agrees, the bridge is unlikely to be on the first page of the list of goals
                      1. 0
                        6 August 2022 14: 34
                        <<The Crimean bridge needs other missiles.>>
                        These also do the job, there are many videos.
                        <<Joe hasn't approved this yet.>>
                        In the US, the new financial year begins in October, the money for Lend-Lease will then be allocated and deliveries will begin strictly on request.
                        <<And if it agrees, the bridge is unlikely to be on the first page of the list of targets>>
                        Be patient and see.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. 0
    10 August 2022 13: 34
    I like Mr.
    Ryabov Kirill from the series "Useless and obsolete". I'm sure he would have said the same thing even if B61 nuclear bombs had been delivered. smile