Leonid Ivashov: “Russia through Putin’s lips proclaims a departure from the pro-Western vector”

89
Leonid Ivashov: “Russia through Putin’s lips proclaims a departure from the pro-Western vector”The first thing that should be noted as a result of the visit of a large government delegation and business representatives of Iraq to Russia, headed by the country's prime minister, is the reversal of Iraq’s policy from pro-American to pro-Russian. Americans for the majority of the population are occupiers, destroyers of their country and the main opponents. Today, these sentiments are transformed in the public consciousness into real politics. The Iraqi leadership has done a rather courageous act: despite the pressure, which is certainly present from the US and its satellites, it is trying to withstand and build an independent foreign and especially economic policy. Therefore, there was a natural turn to Russia.

There is a fear that Americans will impose sanctions

This should be attributed to the fact that Russia today through the mouth of Putin proclaimed a departure from the pro-Western vector of development to the Eurasian one. Apparently, all this needs to be linked, and this is quite a significant increment to our common Russian potential. I was at the round table of the Russia-Iraq Business Council with the participation of the Prime Minister of Iraq, and there is an invitation to Russian business from the government and business of the Iraqi Republic to come to replace American and British companies. Here the gates are wide open.

On the other hand, the Iraqi and Russian sides have an understanding that it will be difficult for business to work without security. The risks are too great, so in parallel with the business project, the issue of military security is being addressed. Therefore, Iraq turned to its traditional partner, Russia, in order to purchase modern types of weapons. This is also the courageous act of the Iraqi side. Of course, there is a fear that Americans will impose sanctions, perhaps against Russian or Iraqi companies. This need not be afraid.

Need to run comprehensive collaboration processes.

In this regard, it is necessary to deal not only with trade, but also with a powerful geopolitical analysis of the processes occurring in the world, the situation in the region, forecasting this situation and launching plans to counter aggressive policies, plans to counter the destruction of the Middle East. Here we need geopolitical analysis, forecast and security planning, which was suggested by me as president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems at the round table.

In parallel, it is necessary to launch comprehensive cooperation processes. The first is culture, education, joint science in mutually beneficial areas, sports joint events and so on. It is difficult for business to be friends, because it is a competitive environment, but all parallel niches for interaction and cooperation. Then Iraq will become our partner, and then - an ally (primarily in the area of ​​security) in the Middle East.

Syria can be broken, Iran can be stirred up and destabilized

It can be said that the result of the successful visit of the Prime Minister at the head of the delegation was a coordinated position on Turkey and on the Syrian events. It is very important. I will note his statement regarding Turkey. He accuses Turkey of aggressive politics. And Russia is talking about this, and Iraq is already talking about it. Without this visit, Iraq would be more restrained. There is one more thing. Of course, Iran’s support is important to Iraq.

In my opinion, in a joint position on Syria between the lines, the situation around Iran is also read. Syria can be broken, Iran can be stirred up and destabilized, therefore today it is necessary to gather forces ready together with Russia to bring stabilization to the region. This is now done.
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +20
    12 October 2012 12: 16
    Good article and positive news.
    1. Fox 070
      +16
      12 October 2012 13: 24
      Quote: Ross
      the news is positive.

      Not only positive, but also quite expected. Everything that the Americans have taken up lately, sooner or later drowns in blood and chaos.
      1. +9
        12 October 2012 16: 54
        Quote: Fox 070
        Everything that the Americans have taken up lately, sooner or later drowns in blood and chaos.

        I would correct it a little: not "recently", but all the time throughout its history.
        1. Fox 070
          0
          12 October 2012 16: 56
          Quote: Letun
          I would correct a little

          Accepted! good
        2. +7
          12 October 2012 18: 00
          Most importantly, before they could establish a pro-American regime, and the regime remained. But today it’s not working out anymore, Iraq was kind of pro-American, but failed to get out of there, and it is already changing companies to Russian ones and purchasing weapons from us. What are they now to climb back there? And under what pretext? It seems democracy has already been brought, what else is needed? This will probably get away with the Iraqis, because in America you cannot be judged 2 times for the same crime (you cannot bring democracy 2 times to the same country in just 10 years)
          1. +3
            12 October 2012 18: 39
            Quote: crazyrom
            Most importantly, before they could establish a pro-American regime, and the regime remained. But today it’s not working anymore, Iraq seemed to be pro-American, but failed to get out of there, and it is already changing companies to Russian ones and purchasing weapons from us. What are they now to climb back there?
            -
            so Libya is in no hurry to become a pro-American puppet. Like, thanks, they helped us get the Amanita down, we thank you for this Amanita (there are the Amres for Lockerbie, and the French on some kind of election problems) have filled up, in the calculation, we don’t need your services anymore!
            Then someone argued with me, either Blat, or Tequila ORAL, that Iraq was allowed generously and from the bounties of spiritual uncle Sam, but in general - they came, they freed him from Hussein, and now let Iraq live as it wants, the USA is such a starless man, Robin Hood and the good uncle in one bottle, walks around the world, at the expense of his dough, at the expense of his military equipment and at the expense of the lives of his soldiers, frees people from bloody ditto and then, as befits Robin Hood, disappears, doesn’t waiting for section of Iraqi oil rewards. Long then neighing. laughing laughing Tequila ORAL, where are you, let's get your pearls, chuckle hunting.
            Well, let's see the sanctions. If introduced, one hundred pounds is a complete failure of the US policy of democratization
            1. tekinoral
              0
              12 October 2012 18: 58
              white beard: I have never argued about Iraq, you have a bad memory laughing laughing laughing now I laugh laughing laughing laughing
            2. Blat
              +1
              12 October 2012 19: 41
              I also did not argue over Iraq)))))))))))))))))))))))))
              1. +1
                12 October 2012 22: 19
                tekinoral,
                Blat,

                They don’t argue with the elders in the East, respect gray hair in a beard, But sometimes his devil pushes him in the rib ... and here is the sword, but his head is off his shoulders .. I'm afraid recourse

                And if he still knows how to ... then take off my hat hi

    2. +13
      12 October 2012 13: 42
      Quote: Ross
      Good article and positive news.

      This makes me happy! Personally, I did not expect such steep maneuvers from Iraq! The situation is encouraging! good
      1. +6
        12 October 2012 13: 44
        So not current amers know how to carry suitcases)))
        And the shell is a great platform. And there it will be possible to run in the caterpillar version.
        1. +16
          12 October 2012 14: 27
          Clintonsha must be furious. To slap such a slap in the face from Iraq.
          The very fact of such a visit to Russia is a blow to Washington’s policy in general and Madame in particular.
          1. +5
            12 October 2012 15: 40
            Quote: Nord
            The very fact of such a visit to Russia is a blow to Washington’s policy in general and Madame in particular.

            Well, thank God!!!
          2. +2
            12 October 2012 16: 37
            Quote: Nord
            Clintonsha must be furious. To slap such a slap in the face from Iraq.


            Her hypocrisy has no limits. This is a vivid example that a woman should not be allowed to enter key posts in any state. At first they do by intuition, and then they think, but more often then they don’t think.
          3. Van
            0
            12 October 2012 22: 59
            Quote: Nord
            Clintonsha must be furious. To slap such a slap in the face from Iraq.


            Yes, it needs rapid steel in her liver, so she could not digest. laughing
      2. mnn_12
        0
        12 October 2012 21: 56
        Dear nycson,
        You did not expect such maneuvers but they are quite logical and expected in my opinion. Over all these years, what the Arabs and their allies and puppets brought to the Iraqi people, apart from devastation, terror and quite purposefully set fire to civil war. The overwhelming majority of Iraqis over the past few years have understood the truth. Russia is quite naturally their ally. If the main part of Iraq (which gives a direct connection between Iran and Syria) opposes the plans of the Zionists and the Anglo-Saxons, then a powerful block will be created that will not neutralize the destructive forces. With the support of Russia and China, he will turn force majeure.
      3. +1
        16 October 2012 22: 05
        Really leaving amers did not leave at the head of Iraq their puppets ????
    3. wturmovik
      -4
      12 October 2012 14: 24
      how to be a naive fool to believe that the pro-American government and the CIA agents are no longer sitting in Iraq ..
      1. +2
        12 October 2012 15: 36
        wturmovik, Agents are sitting with us, the question is: who is who ...
      2. +3
        12 October 2012 15: 41
        Quote: wturmovik
        how to be a naive fool to believe that the pro-American government and the CIA agents are no longer sitting in Iraq ..

        The facts say otherwise!
    4. Den_tw
      -1
      12 October 2012 21: 37
      Yes, they will pick up billions of Russian weapons, and then debts will be written off to them, and what is rich Russia ...
  2. Nevsky
    +8
    12 October 2012 12: 16
    It would be nice, as Mr. Ivashov said. what
    1. +2
      12 October 2012 14: 55
      There are sensible people in Iraq who distinguish lies and hypocrisy from truth and true desire to help people ...
  3. mongoose
    -20
    12 October 2012 12: 18
    Ivashov just noticed it now ???? getting older however
    1. Che
      Che
      +9
      12 October 2012 13: 26
      mongoose,
      This sage has long been talking about this. There is no prophet in his own country. Not to listen to an intelligent person.
      1. -17
        12 October 2012 13: 47
        gee this degeneral? Do not make people laugh too.
        But by the way, a good example of how to make a career successfully marrying the daughter of a marshal.
        1. Oleg1986
          0
          12 October 2012 14: 01
          Is illiterate colonel to judge about this?
        2. karate
          +10
          12 October 2012 14: 13
          How do you know how he got married? When a person loves there is no difference whose daughter the marshal or the janitor is.
  4. +6
    12 October 2012 12: 23
    When will they begin to listen to Ivashov?
    1. -11
      12 October 2012 13: 48
      Do you think an idiot rules our country to listen to Ivashov?
    2. mnn_12
      0
      12 October 2012 22: 17
      He reacts very serially to everything written by Ivashov, at least for the fact that the Western enemies of Russia treat him with unprecedented hatred, he infuriates them. For example, he speaks from Russia about things that I watch on a daily basis in Bulgaria. If you don’t want to go through Russia what happened in Bulgaria, you respect this patriot with great respect.
      1. -2
        13 October 2012 02: 36
        How would you tell? \
        Russia has its own elites who have the end and means.
        And Bulgaria is at least incorrect to compare with Russia (no offense).
        We have our own goals, we have our own. You have always been a part of empires and we, the Empire, each state has its own goals.
  5. +1
    12 October 2012 12: 24
    Today is the day of positive news ..
    1. Yoshkin Kot
      -2
      12 October 2012 15: 23
      Yeah. only fans on
  6. +5
    12 October 2012 12: 31
    The bold step of the Prime Minister of Iraq to conduct an independent policy, statements about Syria and Iran are commendable. Iraqi probably understood that the Amers did not need a stable Middle East, that it was easier to steal oil in troubled waters.
    1. Blat
      -1
      12 October 2012 19: 42
      buy and then give a couple of copies to the Americans. policy)))))))))))))))
      1. survivor
        0
        16 October 2012 09: 37
        and then America did not see our weapons? Have you seen enough of the "Desert Storm"? Here is another ... a conscious process of leaving under the shaggy paws of the world democratizer. apparently in Iraq they are already fed up with their uncle, so they turn the shafts.
  7. Gorchakov
    +9
    12 October 2012 12: 35
    Ivashov, as always, is right ... I would like all his forecasts to be realized ... His words and Putin’s ears ...
    1. +2
      12 October 2012 15: 40
      GorchakovPutin is not a fool himself And Ivashev is working too much for the public. Maybe it should be ...
      1. -1
        16 October 2012 10: 50
        Quote: jimm
        Maybe it should be ...

        The problem is that the audience is watching a gum club at this time.
  8. +11
    12 October 2012 12: 37
    Russia is trying to regain power in the Middle East, as in the old days ... and this is good ..
    Like the fact that our geopolitical adversary (of course the USA), tried to do this by force and achieved nothing but hatred ..... so we got cards in our hands ....
    1. aleksey
      +3
      12 October 2012 12: 57
      everything is right, for the USA in Iraq everything seems to be back to square one, anti-American sentiment (and not just the people), the purchase of weapons in Russia, there will probably be a ton of contracts in other areas, then the Iraqis will want to return the oil industry to their full control, the threat of new sanctions etc...
      1. +1
        16 October 2012 22: 10
        No matter how the Chinese get ahead of us!
    2. +9
      12 October 2012 13: 03
      Quote: volkan

      Russia is trying to regain power in the Middle East, as in the old days ... and that's good

      The most interesting thing is that Russia regains its position through negotiations, and America, even from a position of strength, is losing them. Although it is too early to talk about the return of influence.
      1. Fox 070
        +6
        12 October 2012 13: 29
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Too early to talk about the return of influence.

        Perhaps this is so, but "the road will be mastered by the one walking" or "the port does not flow under the lying state."
  9. Steering wheel
    +1
    12 October 2012 12: 41
    It's time and Mendel for a bitch
    Which of the patriots is seriously interested in political analysts and history, I recommend websites
    http://maramus.livejournal.com/
    http://vk.com/andrey_fursov
    http://nstarikov.ru/
    1. Yoshkin Kot
      -2
      12 October 2012 15: 24
      a scientist than you annoyed? Mendel?
  10. ATY
    ATY
    +2
    12 October 2012 12: 44
    Good news.
  11. karate
    +2
    12 October 2012 12: 44
    That is who would be a good president in Russia.
    1. Che
      Che
      +2
      12 October 2012 13: 29
      karate,
      Of all, perhaps Putin will pull on this.
    2. Fox 070
      +13
      12 October 2012 13: 31
      Quote: karate
      That is who would be a good president in Russia.

      I would choose another ...
      1. +7
        12 October 2012 13: 49
        Quote: Fox 070
        I would choose another ...

        I think that a couple of years would be enough for him to end this mess! good
        1. grizzlir
          +4
          12 October 2012 14: 31
          Quote: nycsson
          I think that a couple of years would be enough for him to end this mess!

          to end the mess, he would have had a couple of weeks, as Fox 070 correctly put it about the creators of the mess THEY do not really hide, you do not need to look through the cracks
          Well, a couple of years to start the economy.
          1. Chemist
            +2
            12 October 2012 15: 43
            Hmm, there is now no such person for "non-triotic" citizens, and Vissarionovich would launch the economy faster, his economic model was very good after the 46th, progressive rates: positive and negative, in general he was a literate man.
            1. Van
              +1
              12 October 2012 23: 05
              Quote: Chemist

              Hmm there is no such person now


              Unfortunately, such personalities appear only once every 100 years. sad
          2. +2
            12 October 2012 15: 43
            Quote: grizzlir
            Well, a couple of years to start the economy.

            I agree! I generally mean it! For a couple of weeks you can’t cope with this chaos !!! hi
        2. Yoshkin Kot
          -2
          12 October 2012 15: 25
          it took him about 20 years. to take power in the country
          1. +2
            12 October 2012 15: 44
            Quote: Yoshkin Cat
            it took him about 20 years. to take power in the country

            Not 20, but 15!
            1. 0
              13 October 2012 02: 38
              less than 15 question by what means?
              Are you ready for this?
      2. grizzlir
        +6
        12 October 2012 13: 52
        Quote: Fox 070
        I would choose another ...
        Yes, I would very much like to see the walking march of the Duma, led by members of the government and oligarchs in the rearguard towards the Magadan Territory.
        1. Fox 070
          +5
          12 October 2012 14: 15
          Quote: grizzlir
          I think that a couple of years would be enough for him

          Surely, especially since THEY do not really hide, there is no need to search through the cracks. Yes

          Quote: grizzlir
          I'd love to see the march on foot

          The sight would be cleaner than the passage of captured Germans through Moscow, and, at least, no less numerous. good
          1. Yoshkin Kot
            -5
            12 October 2012 15: 27
            in, so the Protestants will lead you under guard
            1. +3
              12 October 2012 15: 45
              Quote: Yoshkin Cat
              in, so the Protestants will lead you under guard

              But they didn’t guess! This will lead you soon!
              1. Fox 070
                +2
                12 October 2012 16: 11
                Quote: nycsson
                But they didn’t guess! This will lead you soon!

                Alex, leave the sick! Old man, God forbid, health will be unsteady ... Let him wave his sword at his health. Yes
                1. +4
                  12 October 2012 16: 33
                  Quote: Fox 070
                  Old man, God forbid, health will be unsteady ...

                  One will be less virulence !!!
                  1. Fox 070
                    +3
                    12 October 2012 16: 58
                    Quote: nycsson
                    One will be less virulence !!!

                    Good you !!! laughing
                    1. +1
                      12 October 2012 21: 28
                      Quote: Fox 070
                      Good you !!!

                      Good is not about me! hi
                      1. Fox 070
                        0
                        12 October 2012 21: 38
                        Quote: nycsson
                        nycsson

                        The site administration closed the discussion thread on the article "VKP (b), Zionism and Stalin." for unknown reasons.
        2. Yoshkin Kot
          -1
          12 October 2012 15: 26
          rather, you’ll stomp along the stage, it amazes me, the self-righteousness of youth, they didn’t hit finger in finger in life, but
          1. +3
            12 October 2012 16: 32
            Quote: Yoshkin Cat
            rather, you’ll stomp along the stage, it amazes me, the self-righteousness of youth, they didn’t hit finger in finger in life, but

            Well no! The situation in our country and in the world suggests that you will soon drown ..........
      3. karate
        +2
        12 October 2012 14: 15
        I would too, but they don’t let others out into the light of day.
      4. Yoshkin Kot
        -4
        12 October 2012 15: 25
        give a shovel?
      5. +2
        12 October 2012 15: 43
        Fox 070, Yes, there were people (hereinafter referred to as Lermontov) ...
      6. ded
        -4
        12 October 2012 16: 02
        I would choose another ...


        This one would first cut out half of the country, and the other half would put the whole world on the ears. And don't think that you would be in the second "surviving" half.
        1. Fox 070
          +3
          12 October 2012 16: 22
          Quote: ded
          the other half would put the whole world on their ears.

          Well, not the worst thing to do if it’s a world mired in lies, blood and chaos.
          Quote: ded
          do not think that you would be in the second "surviving" half.

          But you would definitely be in the first. hi
          1. Blat
            -2
            12 October 2012 19: 47
            you probably, too, if you are so worried about the world wallowing in lies, hypocrisy, and chaos. another way is also possible. a dumb performer and sing diferembes to lies, hypocrisy and chaos, but already made by your chosen one)))))))))) )))))))))
        2. Van
          0
          12 October 2012 23: 14
          Quote: ded
          This first would cut out half of the country, and the second half would put the whole world on its ears.

          This concept is not acceptable in the 21st century, now we need other approaches since demography does not shine. No.
  12. bask
    +4
    12 October 2012 12: 45
    Words must be supported by deeds. Yes, it is necessary to answer the Turkish provocation harshly, personally to the president. The government is resigning there alone crap ..... s.
  13. sapulid
    +4
    12 October 2012 12: 56
    Talking about the return of power in the Middle East by Russia, at the moment, is simply unrealistic. The Russian Federation, now, does not have sufficient military strength and a self-sufficient national economy. Thanks to everyone, everyone knows. The monument, it’s necessary, is not doused with paint, but with shit.
    The direction of "friendship against someone" is sometimes destructive. Supporters and allies must be selected carefully, otherwise, a stab in the back is inevitable.
    The departure from the one-vector development model is very positive and playing on the contradictions of the parties you can earn more than as a result of winning the warrior.
    1. +3
      12 October 2012 13: 32
      Quote: sapulid
      Talking about the return of power in the Middle East by Russia, at the moment, is simply unrealistic

      I hope this is temporary. Power must be restored, starting with the restoration of economic and political ties, to earn respect for the peoples of the Middle East, through all this to increase influence on events in the region, and there will appear power. And it must be strengthened by the power of one’s own country and the armed forces.
    2. bask
      +4
      12 October 2012 13: 36
      Yes, it’s strong, Russia’s thanks, there’s not much to be a shit, and there’s nothing to answer to “rudeness,” provocation of the Turks. ,, Blue ,, to block the southern flow? Gazprom does not agree.
      1. Yoshkin Kot
        -2
        12 October 2012 15: 28
        and the Constantinople province could be in the Russian army! who to thank?
      2. +2
        12 October 2012 15: 48
        Quote: bask
        ,, Blue ,, block the southern stream?

        Why not!
        Quote: bask
        Gazprom does not agree.

        You never know that he will not agree .......
    3. +4
      12 October 2012 13: 47
      Quote: sapulid
      The Russian Federation, now, does not have sufficient military strength and a self-sufficient national economy.

      All that Russia needs to do now is to build up its military power in all directions. And boost the economy by creating jobs.
      1. bask
        +1
        12 October 2012 13: 55
        Who argues. The case for GDP, he is at the helm, 25 ml of jobs I hope not only PR, pre-election campaign. We must turn to face the people. And do not stand ass to it. Then we will break everything to pieces !!!
        1. +3
          12 October 2012 15: 47
          Quote: bask
          We must turn to the people to face. And do not stand ass to it. Then we will tear everyone to pieces !!!

          I agree! good
  14. +1
    12 October 2012 13: 30
    Quote: sapulid
    Supporters and allies must be selected carefully, otherwise, a stab in the back is inevitable.

    I completely agree. Anyway, the comment is good, competent. There is nothing to add.
  15. -5
    12 October 2012 13: 30
    Comrade Ivashov more and more makes me feel like a poorly adequate person who notices in his life only what fits into his views.
    Russia proclaimed ... from a pro-Western vector ...
    Yes, the Lord is with you, comrade Ivashev! When, in what year, Putin’s Munich speech took place?
    And about the "new crusade against Libya" - when was it said?
    1. +4
      12 October 2012 13: 45
      Quote: BigRiver
      When, in what year, Putin’s Munich speech took place?

      In 2004!
      Quote: BigRiver
      And about the "new crusade against Libya" - when was it said?

      Not long before the attack!
  16. +1
    12 October 2012 13: 34
    That is right. I agree with many on the fact that the Russian Federation so far cannot independently influence the essence of all processes, both military and political, but the fact of creating some kind of secret alliance is an excellent precedent. Russia, Iran, Syria, Iraq - a similar alliance in the Middle East can break the plans of many democrats, and it’s not at all a military power that is WHEN inferior to the West, but the will of the people of these countries and their desire for stability and for the present, and not imaginary and imposed world.
    1. -1
      16 October 2012 11: 09
      Quote: silver_roman
      Russia, Iran, Syria, Iraq -

      Yaby added here Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan ...
  17. +1
    12 October 2012 13: 42
    The article is great! It's high time to move on to active measures! The Americans will step on the mine themselves, one more time. America is sick with its democracy, and we saw it in the grave. So they destabilize the situation where it would be beneficial to them: where there is a lot of oil. Therefore, we must fight for Syria. Libya, Egypt - there are now Islamists, and they are still "friends" for the United States, but Syria and Iran cannot be given away.
  18. +3
    12 October 2012 13: 50
    yes, it has long been clear that the "western partners" just want to make a colony of us for the extraction of resources ... what is the worth of the statement made by the iron lady in due time that on the territory of Russia it is necessary to make a colony with a population of about 10 million people who would mined resources ...
  19. +1
    12 October 2012 14: 00
    By the way, the example with Libya is very revealing; you don’t need to throw the Russian Federation on grandmas.
    In December 2007, during Gaddafi’s visit to Paris, a memorandum was signed on the purchase by Libya of a large batch of French arms worth up to 4,5 billion euros. As they wrote, this “package” consisted of 14 Dassault Rafale fighters, 10 Eurocopter Tiger combat helicopters, 15 Eurocopter EC 725 Caracal (Cougar) transport helicopters, 10 Eurocopter AS.550 Fennec light helicopters, two Gowind project corvettes, eight patrol boats, 13 wheeled armored combat vehicles ERC90 Sagaie, 25 light armored vehicles VBL, 60 wheeled armored personnel carriers VAB, as well as UR MICA air-to-air (and possibly in the form of air defense systems), 155-mm self-propelled howitzers CAESAR and air defense radar. In addition, the repair and modernization of another 17 Libyan Air Force Dassault Mirage F.1 fighters (in addition to the 12 being repaired under a 2006 contract) was mentioned. According to the memorandum, final purchases were to be agreed upon by both governments by July 1, 2008.
    In fact, Gaddafi actually threw the French and did not buy anything from them in this package (although there were various separate contracts for any small things with the French).

    In parallel, Gaddafi was negotiating with the Russian side, but in the end, too, for five years of negotiations, the promised package (Su-35, S-300, T-90, etc.) also did not sign up before the start of the revolution.
    In general, the konnel was desperate to bargain and bicker with both sides, for which he is now paying. One of the reasons why it is now so easy for all external partners to surrender is because by his own methods he rebuilt everyone against himself and everyone believes that he did not get the proper profit from him, and that this bug and scoundrel.

    And so the colonel tried to sit on two chairs and over the past five years signed military contracts with Europe, it is estimated that it is quite comparable to Russia, if not more. With the Russian Federation, contracts were signed for about $ 2 billion, of which 1,3 billion is a package at the beginning of 2010, (six Yak-130, "Torahs", modernization of T-72, ship repairs, machine guns) which in fact, did not have time to implement. He signed with Europe for about 2-2,5 billion dollars, but mostly in bulk, as well as all kinds of repairs and modernization, there were practically no new "platforms" there.

    I would like to note that Algeria signed a package of contracts with the Russian Federation in 2006, and now it already has a bunch of useful charms (SU-30MKA, S-300PMU-2, Pantsiri, 2 submarines, etc.).
    1. Yoshkin Kot
      -7
      12 October 2012 15: 29
      Russia, in principle, could not betray Libya, because it was never ours, no matter what you think about it, as by the way, Serbia
      1. +2
        12 October 2012 15: 50
        Quote: Yoshkin Cat
        as the way and Serbia

        I do not presume to judge about Libya! But about Serbia - you’ve gone too far! You fat minus from me personally !!! fool
        1. 0
          13 October 2012 02: 41
          Well, actually there is a double opinion
          1 To the population of Russia, the Serbs BROTHERS are only their rulers mud.ki.
          2 EBNu tries there was nothing to do except a glass.
          By the way, gentlemen, give me 5 years and we will get a Serbian foreign Legion (fortunately)
          1. survivor
            0
            16 October 2012 09: 47
            ?????. "By the way, ladies and gentlemen, give 5 years and we will get the Serbian Foreign Legion (fortunately)"
            I did not understand, perhaps from this place in more detail.
  20. vladimir64ss
    +2
    12 October 2012 15: 41
    Suddenly bold behavior of the Iraqi authorities. Russia has become an independent value. The West is rapidly losing its civilizational authority and cannot be raised with guns.
  21. 0
    12 October 2012 16: 43
    Russia needs to pursue its coherent policy in the Middle East
  22. Ghosh
    0
    12 October 2012 17: 43
    And what can be said about this article. And you can only say in the words of a classic ... "The ice is broken, gentlemen of the jury, I will command the parade" ...


    And the rest is all according to the plan. Twisted blew and went.
  23. +1
    12 October 2012 18: 16
    I agree with the author. The time to "collect stones" has long come, political will would suffice.
  24. +1
    12 October 2012 18: 29
    Thanks to everyone for the cons. hi
    And to expand the horizons of fans of Comrade Ivashova I recommend that you familiarize yourself with his election program of December 2011.
    Try to find at least some mechanisms for implementing his message there.
    For integrity, so to speak, "pictures".
  25. Stasi.
    0
    12 October 2012 18: 56
    Peter the First bequeathed to Russia: "To turn back to Europe, to face the East." He also planned to arrange an expedition to the East and establish economic ties there. And only death prevented Peter from changing the pro-Western vector of Russian policy to the Eastern. The entire policy of the Romanov dynasty was oriented towards the West, the goal was to integrate Russia into the Western world, to make it a part of the West. And if Russia closed the window to Europe and opened the window to the East, we would have a completely different story.
    1. Blat
      -4
      12 October 2012 19: 52
      and all his life, Peter systematically moved to the west. and only death prevented him)))))))))))))))))) what could disturb him when he lived? Was he a tyrant and an autocrat in one person? he had a bunch of relatives in Europe)))))))))))))))))))) and the east for your information then the whole was one big colony. so what was he to do there then?)))) )))))))))))))) pearl issued))))))))))))) I applaud while standing)))))))))))))))
  26. delakelv124
    0
    12 October 2012 19: 42
    call girls ------ http://rlu.ru/a8z
    -
    order by phone in the form ----- http://rlu.ru/a8z
    -
    No SMS! No registration!
    -
    low prices, checked license plates --- http://rlu.ru/a8z
    -
    if all numbers are visible
    girl WORKS today
    if the last two digits are replaced by "xx"
    busy or day off
    1. +1
      12 October 2012 20: 16
      Admins! What kind of sex shop appeared here?
  27. +1
    12 October 2012 21: 26
    I must admit that Ivashov suffers from populism .. He’s pouring mud on Putin, he’s writing cheers-patriotic articles .. It’s not serious ..
    In Iraq, you need to understand that this is the result of work for more than one year ... everything is in a heap. No.
  28. 0
    12 October 2012 22: 27
    Something wrong. Well, I do not believe that puppets would conduct their own policies, with the sovereign still alive. Could it be an exchange: a 4-lard contract against Assad?
  29. +1
    12 October 2012 22: 36
    Quote: Alien-X
    Ivashov suffers from populism .. He is pouring mud at Putin, or he is writing cheers-patriotic articles.
    That's right, the GDP is criticized for Yeltsin and Serdyukov, but on the whole, the best ruler has not been the last 30 years.
    They criticize in the hope that he will understand and correct! Yes
  30. +1
    13 October 2012 01: 32
    That's right. everything is done. Iraq needs to be supported once they dare to oppose the Gendarme. Let's hope that by joint efforts we will keep Syria. Sincerely.
  31. 0
    13 October 2012 02: 45
    By the way about the degeneral Ivashov question on the backfill find real military awards, and not by length of service? Is there a Hero of the Soviet Union?
  32. 0
    13 October 2012 02: 49
    Quote: wturmovik
    how to be a naive fool to believe that the pro-American government and the CIA agents are no longer sitting in Iraq ..

    I also thought about this and could not understand at all - how so, the Americans captured Iraq, they said for the sake of democracy, and we believed that for the sake of oil. Here, like Iraq, it is not the United States that chooses, but us, is it really that the United States did not capture Iraq from the vile greed? I would not rush to make such a conclusion.
    Most likely, somewhere in 2005–2006, when the invaders fought with mighty Shiites (remember - the Mahdi Army) and the Shiites began to unite with the Sunnis against the invaders, the Amers had to seek support from the locals. They found support and the uprising gradually died out. But apparently, those dudes who provided this support strictly demanded independence through a certain number of years. Those. all quietly agreed to save the United States face, for the United States clearly could not calm the rebels by force of arms. And apparently, this is the most nth number of years has passed. In short, we will see how it turns further
  33. Igoriok222
    0
    13 October 2012 16: 59
    Great article! ! !