US Air Force interested in integrated circuit aircraft

44

Boeing X-48B - an experienced UAV for testing a new scheme

The US Air Force plans to explore the possibility of creating fundamentally new military transport aircraft and air tankers. For a sharp increase in useful volumes and carrying capacity of such equipment, it is proposed to use the so-called. integrated aerodynamic scheme. In the near future, it is planned to conduct the necessary research, and in the future, the launch of a full-fledged project is not ruled out.

Looking for profit


Aviation Week announced the new plans for the US Air Force on July 7. According to him, over the next few days, the Pentagon was going to release the so-called. request for information on a military transport aircraft and/or tanker of an unusual design. In the next few weeks, the Air Force will accept applications for participation in the research program, and then select a contractor.



It is reported that so far it is only about conducting research work. The customer has determined the basic requirements for hypothetical aircraft, and the performers will have to form the optimal appearance of such equipment and scientifically substantiate it. The timing of such studies is not specified, but the contract value reaches $56,9 million.

The wishes of the Air Force for the new project are generally simple. It is necessary to find the optimal variant of the design of an integrated circuit aircraft (Blended Wing Body), showing increased flight and economic performance. It is assumed that the unusual scheme will improve aerodynamics and related characteristics, as well as increase the available volumes to accommodate the payload.


Model HWB aircraft from Lockheed Martin in a wind tunnel

The transporter and tanker on the new platform must surpass the existing equipment of their classes in terms of economy and flight range. It is also expected to obtain a significant reduction in operating costs. So, the Air Force wants a full translation. fleet tankers for new equipment gave annual savings of at least $2 billion.

Whether these requirements can be met is unknown. In the near future, the Pentagon will accept applications and select a contractor who will conduct the necessary studies and form a technical proposal. If the preliminary design meets the requirements of the customer, then a new contract for the full development of new aircraft may appear. However, the success of such research is not guaranteed.

perspective scheme


The integrated aerodynamic scheme was proposed quite a long time ago, but the active development of this idea began only in the nineties of the XX century. with the advent of new methods of research and design. Using these ideas, a lot of different projects were developed, but the vast majority of them did not even reach the construction and testing of experimental equipment.

US Air Force interested in integrated circuit aircraft

HWB in flight

From a technical and aerodynamic point of view, an integrated circuit is a cross between a flying wing and a tailless one. The basis of such a glider are swept planes of a large area, like a flying wing. At the same time, a pronounced fuselage is preserved, the surface of which smoothly flows into the bearing planes. It is possible to use various protruding elements: engine nacelles, keel ends, etc. In some projects, the tail unit is also used.

Such an aircraft design is characterized by a certain complexity at the development stage. It is necessary to combine high aerodynamic characteristics and structural strength. At the same time, the presence of a large number of sags and fairings simultaneously complicates and simplifies design tasks.

As in the case of a flying wing, the integrated circuit gives a gain in flight performance and economic performance. An aircraft of this kind has the maximum possible bearing surface and all the accompanying advantages. In this case, there are restrictions on maximum speed, maneuverability, etc.


Cargo placement in the HWB fuselage

Like a flying wing, the integrated circuit is distinguished by the large internal volume of the airframe. So, in a wing of a large area, tanks of increased capacity can be placed. At the same time, the integrated circuit provides for the presence of a pronounced fuselage, which can accommodate a cargo or passenger cabin of sufficient volume.

All the advantages of an integrated circuit can be used to create passenger aircraft, transporters or tankers. Thus, a large wing area will allow the transport aircraft to take on board more cargo, and the tanker will be able to carry and transfer more fuel. With all this, they will be more economical than their counterparts in the normal circuit.

Finished developments


It is curious that the US Air Force is just launching a new research program, and its potential participants already have developments on this topic. So, back in 2016, Lockheed Martin presented the original concept of a refueling aircraft or a “hybrid” transporter (Hybrid Wing Body – HWB).

This project proposed the construction of an integral aircraft with a swept wing and a characteristically shaped fuselage. On the rear fuselage, immediately behind the wing, there are two engine nacelles. A T-tail was also used. Other options for the aerodynamic shape were also considered, incl. with a different plumage design.


By the time of the first announcement, the HWB project had entered the research and testing stage. A scale model of such an aircraft with a wingspan of approx. 3 m and weight approx. 20 kg, equipped with a pair of electric motors. It was tested in a wind tunnel, and the first free flight with radio control was expected in the near future.

A full-size HWB aircraft was to have a 76 m wingspan and a cargo compartment of the appropriate dimensions. According to calculations, its carrying capacity should be at the level of the serial C-5 - about 125 tons. With similar flight characteristics, fuel consumption should be 70% lower than that of the existing C-17.

It is known that the HWB project from Lockheed Martin went through the research stage and provided the collection of the necessary data. It was assumed that in the near future, developments on it will be able to be used to create a real aviation technology. However, this did not happen - due to the lack of interest from potential customers.

Unpredictable future


It can be assumed that Lockheed Martin will be interested in the new Air Force request and take the necessary measures. She can return the HWB project from the archive and re-offer it to a potential customer. In addition, other aircraft manufacturers, including developing similar projects. Which company will offer the best conditions and interest the Air Force is unknown.


Whether the performer will cope with the tasks set is a big question. The formation of the appearance of an aircraft of an unusual scheme as a whole will not be a big problem. The experience of the last decades and a number of well-known projects confirm this. However, the Pentagon imposes special requirements on flight and economic characteristics for a promising transporter and tanker. It cannot be ruled out that such a technical task will turn out to be too complicated, and it will not be possible to achieve all the specified parameters.

However, so far we are talking only about research work, and any result of it will be useful for the Air Force. If the contractor copes with all the tasks and forms the optimal appearance of the aircraft with the necessary characteristics and capabilities, then this can be followed by a full-fledged design. Failure at the R&D stage, in turn, will show weaknesses in the terms of reference and the new concept - and will also help determine where to focus in future work.

Distant perspective


The US Air Force has plans to develop its military transport aviation and tanker fleet for several years to come. It is envisaged to continue the operation of existing machines and gradually replace the oldest ones with new production equipment. At the same time, the list of aircraft for new purchases for the coming years has already been determined.

So far, the Air Force plans to purchase only equipment of already known types, and these are aircraft of a normal aerodynamic design. Technique of a different appearance is not even in the plans. However, now the Pentagon is ready to consider alternative schemes and, if there are advantages, to accept them into operation. Whether the integrated architecture of aircraft will be able to get into the field of air transport will become known in a few years, after the completion of the program starting now.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -4
    14 July 2022 08: 28
    And cho, the money will be printed, but they don’t have Nabiullina. feel Explore at least 100 promising schemes and build.
    1. 0
      14 July 2022 09: 15
      And what does Nabiullina have to do with it? With all their schemes, there were quite pragmatic people there. When they sank their aircraft carrier, they sank not just like that, but with intent. Find out the survivability of an aircraft carrier. Vitality was very high. Well, they certainly created new aircraft carriers taking into account the experience of flooding the old one.
      The wishes of the Air Force for the new project are generally simple. It is necessary to find the optimal variant of the design of an integrated circuit aircraft (Blended Wing Body), showing increased flight and economic performance. It is assumed that the unusual scheme will improve aerodynamics and related characteristics, as well as increase the available volumes to accommodate the payload. The transporter and tanker on the new platform must surpass the existing equipment of their classes in terms of economy and flight range. It is also expected to obtain a significant reduction in operating costs. Thus, the Air Force wants the full conversion of the tanker fleet to new equipment to provide annual savings of at least $2 billion.
      Nothing so swung for savings?
      The contract value reaches $56,9 million.
      Well, round up to 60 million bucks. For 60 million, get a savings of 2 billion! Is the game worth the candle?
      1. +1
        14 July 2022 09: 24
        I saw a similar, very cool Soviet project ...
        1. 0
          14 July 2022 09: 55
          It turns out that the USSR was ahead of its time!
          1. +6
            14 July 2022 12: 34
            The glider, where, in addition to the wings, the hull is also a carrier, was worked out by both us and the Americans at the dawn of astronautics (just look at our Burs). Well, now we decided to bring this design down to earth. Although we have aircraft integrated circuits and are now used in combat aviation: MiG-29, Su-27, and so on. (By the way, the lifting force of the Su-27 hull is one and a half times higher than that of the F-15)
            Yes, at least take a look at the Tu-160:

            Not as pronounced as in the proposed American HWB aircraft, but nevertheless
            Earlier, on the Internet, the concept of a cargo aircraft flashed according to this scheme.
            1. 0
              14 July 2022 15: 23
              I know another bomber with such a glider. I didn’t immediately think about it when I saw the first photo in the article.
              1. -2
                21 July 2022 10: 14
                only started in the XNUMXs.

                Those. MiG-29 and Su-27 do not exist? The integrated circuit has long been calculated and worked out.
                The above figures, such as the Tu-160 and B-2, do not particularly relate to the integrated circuit. Tu-160 - a dead-end direction of variable sweep (basically, including ours, they abandoned it). B-2 - a flying wing, also not the most unambiguous solution, has been tested since the 20s of the twentieth century without breakthrough success.
                And the most economic solution can be seen at every airport in large numbers.
            2. Eug
              0
              15 July 2022 20: 28
              Sorry, but the load-bearing body is called the "monocoque fuselage" and this power circuit has been used for a long time and widely. In the integrated circuit, the fuselage, together with the wing, is involved in the creation of lift. Everything else is accurate.
              1. 0
                15 July 2022 21: 25
                Quote: Eug
                In the integrated circuit, the fuselage, together with the wing, is involved in the creation of lift.
                So I wrote that the lifting force of the Su-27 hull is one and a half times higher than that of the F-15. That is, it participates in the lifting force together with the wing. And in the MiG-29, the fuselage provides 40% of the lift, the wing 60%.
                1. Eug
                  0
                  16 July 2022 08: 21
                  Yes, but at the beginning you write about the "bearing body", ....
                  1. 0
                    16 July 2022 15: 18
                    Quote: Eug
                    Yes, but at the beginning you write about the "bearing body", ....

                    I'm not strong in terminology sad
    2. 0
      20 July 2022 14: 46
      They will just give them some money for research. and then we will buy it from them for oil at a high price. like papuan beads
  2. +2
    14 July 2022 08: 31
    Tupolev's developments of the 80s 90s ... No?
    1. +1
      15 July 2022 19: 11
      Rather Antonov, for Tupolev, at the very least, but looked after. feel
      1. 0
        15 July 2022 19: 19
        Maybe I'm not familiar with Antonov's developments of this kind.
  3. 0
    14 July 2022 08: 45
    =. In the next few weeks, the Air Force will accept applications for participation in the research program, and then select a contractor. =
    An interesting approach to business. This is simply unrealistic for us.
    1. +3
      14 July 2022 08: 56
      Well, there will be, for example, Lockheed, a couple of foreign aircraft manufacturers with developments thirty years old, relatively speaking, and a couple more campaigns from the United States that did nothing larger than a trike.
      I'm exaggerating a little, of course, but this is exactly what most of the "absolutely transparent and democratic" tenders look like.
      And then people are surprised how American technicians buy hammers for 750 bucks. Our sawyers are small children compared to how the US budget is torn apart.
      1. 0
        14 July 2022 09: 22
        Well, there will be, for example, Lockheed, a couple of foreign aircraft manufacturers with developments thirty years old, relatively speaking, and a couple more campaigns from the United States that did nothing larger than a trike.
        I don’t know about motorized hang gliders, but Russia buys planes, not the USA from Russia!
        I'm exaggerating a little, of course, but this is exactly what most of the "absolutely transparent and democratic" tenders look like.
        And how is Russia with aircraft tenders? Are there many competitors within the country?
        And then people are surprised how American technicians buy hammers for 750 bucks. Our sawyers are small children compared to how the US budget is torn apart.
        This is really so. They drink here and there. But in the US there is a network of highways, there is an auto industry, there is an aviation industry. How is there such a difference in results when sawing here and there?
        1. 0
          22 July 2022 13: 38
          Gorgeous roads. This is Florida if anything. What's going on in the rust belt?
          The US auto industry is in agony. Now there are Japanese assembly plants in the USA. Korean and European brands.
          Name an aircraft that is at least 80% assembled in the USA.
  4. +4
    14 July 2022 09: 00
    I do not believe in miracles. Reducing fuel costs by 70% is not even fantastic, this is from the section about feeding two (sort of) bread to a hungry crowd. Airlines go bankrupt when the route lengthens, such as fuel began to spend more by 3-4%. And here such grace, 70%.
  5. +2
    14 July 2022 09: 09
    Everything is logical. Before the corona, they wrote that Boeing and Airbus were also interested.
    technologies have approached, apparently, that it has become possible to think about such a complex, but economical scheme.
    While they are researching, until this and that, you see, in 10 years something large will appear.

    It's a pity that they have, and not we have
    1. 0
      14 July 2022 10: 12
      It's a pity that they have, and not we have
      And we will buy from them. Like everything else ... And it's a pity ... that it's not with us ..
    2. +1
      14 July 2022 20: 57
      It's a pity that they have, and not we have

      Yes, wait to cry or rejoice. It's about research work. Calculate whether something worthwhile comes out of all these schemes. I believe that 60 lemon bucks and ours are able to allocate. Yes, and this work is quite ordinary for itself (enumeration of possible layouts, profiles, etc.) and has been carried out for a long time both with us and with them. Maybe they will spit in the end, saying "Well, what the hell is your reusable toilet paper at such a price. We'll manage with mugs, as before"
      This is aviation. And in it the most optimal scheme
      for a size, well, for example, 15 meters, with an increase to 30 meters, it can become the worst of all possible.
  6. +7
    14 July 2022 10: 36
    Nothing new. Suffice it to recall the English Volcano 60 years ago. If everything were so simple, then transport aircraft would have long been produced according to this scheme. The internal volume, of course, will increase, but the mass of the airframe and drag will also increase. An increase in the thrust of the SS will be required, which will automatically lead to an increase in fuel consumption and the mass of the aircraft, and so on ad infinitum. The classical scheme is classical because at this stage of the development of technology it is optimal. But the appearance of something new is not yet visible, the development of aviation, in principle, stopped a long time ago, 30 years ago, recently there has only been a licking of what was achieved earlier.
    1. +3
      14 July 2022 17: 13
      The mass of the airframe can just be reduced by 30 percent, due to the spacing of a set of power elements. Previously, the plug was in resonance, with the advent of new materials and technologies, it is quite feasible.
      The shape for 500-650 km / h is optimal, just for transport workers.
      That's just with fuel economy clearly driven laughing there is clearly an extra zero
      1. +3
        14 July 2022 18: 07
        Exploding a set automatically forces it to be boosted. With resonance, as far as I know, they are struggling with a change in design, although I am not an expert on this issue. I was even ashamed to write about fuel economy, it is so unrealistic. stop There were experimental machines of this form, sorry, but too lazy to look for examples, but alas, things did not go further than flying experimental machines. The scale factor begins to affect - one thing in the root of the wing we have 2 m like the Tu-160, and quite another 3 - 4 m to provide the cargo compartment. And here the power set will become very heavy.
  7. 0
    14 July 2022 21: 17
    In a tanker, the main thing for today is unmanned aerial vehicles. Second is the price. Moreover, this also applies to ground trucks, fuel trucks. Refueling is meant outside the enemy air defense coverage area, it is unlikely to lose a truck, and it’s not scary if it is unmanned. It can fly slowly, in the most economical mode, incl. and not be jet even if combat aircraft can refuel at low speeds (why shouldn’t they be able to?!). It is even possible to deliberately lose a truck in a one-way mission, if necessary - to transfer more fuel to the attack / reconnaissance aircraft at a high cost.

    Here I see a qualitative change, and in optimizing the characteristics of the airframe, it doesn’t matter whether it is a tanker or another aircraft purpose, it’s just a calm evolution. If it is possible to save 10% of fuel - well, yes. Nice bonus.
    1. +1
      14 July 2022 21: 36
      Quote: Proctologist
      In a tanker, the main thing for today is unmanned aerial vehicles. .


      In the tanker, the main thing is work through the filling bar. For through it pumping goes almost ten times faster than through a hose and a cone.
      And only a person can control the bar for now.
      There is no automation yet.

      Accordingly, drones in tankers are possible, but only for small volumes.
      Those. type naval, deck.
      But big ones will not be unmanned.
    2. 0
      14 July 2022 23: 11
      “In a tanker, the main thing today is unmanned aerial vehicles” - safety has always been the main thing in aviation.
      “It concerns the ground, fuel trucks” - I imagine on the road a kind of chauffeurless self-propelled multi-ton bomb. stop No one dares to run trains without drivers on the rails.
      I will not elaborate further.
      1. 0
        15 July 2022 23: 44
        No one dares to run trains without drivers on the rails.
        Sydney? Dubai?
  8. +2
    15 July 2022 11: 48
    It makes sense to recall the Ekip project
  9. 0
    15 July 2022 12: 22
    Hmm. We also had ready-made developments. The flying wing was quite successfully built by Bartini before the War. The aircraft showed excellent flight qualities, including unique maneuverability. The argument against was "you need to control the flying wing in a completely different way than any other aircraft."
    One can only marvel at the fantastic leaps of the then Soviet military thought. If Grabin was simply forbidden to put a muzzle brake on his guns, with the anecdotal wording "emission of gases unmasks the position of the gun" (why, why didn’t anyone even interrupt this imbecile, anacephalus, reference gouging ?! not only didn’t draw attention to the fact that this is not argument, this is some kind of bleating, an outburst of brainlessness !!), then Bartini was simply imprisoned. For a bomber that would not be equal for several decades ...
    1. Eug
      0
      15 July 2022 20: 21
      Not only Bartini, but also Kalinin, who created a flying wing - tailless in Kharkov ... the problem is that the then level of technology did not allow achieving the necessary characteristics of stability and controllability, because of this a number of disasters ...
      1. 0
        18 July 2022 12: 08
        There were no problems with technology and could not be. The flying wing is much more stable than the classic aircraft, and is controlled no worse than it. It was necessary to consider such a wing differently, that's all. Bartini and counted. I have no evidence, but, like everything bad in our then aviation, I see Yakovlev's protruding ears. Frightened, , competition as usual.
        1. Eug
          0
          18 July 2022 15: 59
          Yakovlev gained importance a little later, a year from 1938. And at the expense of controllability - for the LK CM and AD, the focus is close relative to normal AD circuits, which imposes certain restrictions on the actions of the controls in the longitudinal channel, plus cross-links in the course-roll channels are much stronger, than in the traditional scheme. Speaking of technologies, I meant management technologies - not production.
          1. 0
            19 July 2022 07: 14
            Ah, thanks for the clarification. We translate into Russian - the plane turned out to be too responsive to control. I twitched the knob a little and turned it around. In addition, he could perform some of the figures, in principle, impossible for the aircraft of the classical scheme. Apparently, it could already be called fundamentally unstable? Or not yet?
            Of course, cable traction and balancers did not allow for easy mitigation of jerks and stalls. So what? Who said that "any cook" should be able to drive an elite car for the most difficult tasks? It was quite possible to find a couple of dozen pilots with a very firm hand and ready to learn how to steer a car carrying a gigantic bomb load, and at the same time easily dodging fighters)
            Someone very, very bad, who is not a friend of the USSR, but only a friend of his pocket and post, shot down Bartini's plane and Bartini himself. This is not a mistake, this is some kind of enemy. Maybe not Yakovlev ...
  10. Eug
    0
    15 July 2022 20: 17
    Why not make the fuselage generate lift? If only the technology would allow .. the "supra-fuselage" placement of the engines is doubtful - there, at the inlet to the engines, a strongly perturbed, and besides, rarefied air flow with vortices is obtained, and it will not work to stabilize it in front of the fan, because. the length of the input device is simply not enough.
    1. 0
      16 July 2022 10: 27
      “Do not force the fuselage to generate lift?” - the fuselage of absolutely any aircraft creates lift.
      “If only the technology would allow” - and what does the production problem have to do with it?
      “Doubt is caused by the “supra-fuselage” placement of engines” - this is just a drawing.
  11. 0
    20 July 2022 14: 49


    here is the ideal shape of the aircraft in terms of aerodynamics
    1. 0
      21 July 2022 09: 45
      Ideal aerodynamics depends on the task at hand. First, they determine what is more important - the economy of the flight, carrying capacity or speed. And only after that they decide what aerodynamics will be ideal.
    2. 0
      9 October 2022 20: 00
      You should not reduce all aerodynamics to the least air resistance. The speed of the machine is not taken into account in the description. It is necessary to write: "the optimal form for a speed of 800 km per hour." And even then the sea is incomprehensible: the wrong shape of the fuselage and the air intakes in the stern for some reason.
  12. 0
    21 July 2022 09: 42
    The flying wing scheme has one significant drawback - from the point of view of aerodynamics, this arrangement is not stable. And stability in flight is ensured by sophisticated electronics with a high degree of integration of all systems responsible for flight (control surfaces and engine thrust). All this is due to the fact that the circuit itself creates a colossal lifting force, but in turbulent conditions this quality can play a cruel joke, dumping the device into a tailspin. And since the mass of such an apparatus is not like that of a hang glider, then bringing it to a horizontal flight is an extremely non-trivial task.
  13. 0
    21 July 2022 21: 43
    In what the Yankees are great, so in constant search for innovations good
  14. 0
    9 October 2022 19: 54
    The advantages of the integrated circuit will be shown by the wind tunnel. But disadvantages: such an aircraft is extremely unstable in flight. They cannot be controlled manually.
    .
    so whether it will fly or not, it does not depend on aircraft designers. It will be possible to create a control system - it will fly. If they don't give money to electronics engineers and programmers, it won't fly.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"