The Stupor UAV suppression complex is involved in the Special Operation

49
The Stupor UAV suppression complex is involved in the Special Operation

The other day it became known that the first portable electronic warfare systems "Stupor" got into the units of the Russian army and the militia of Donbass. These products are designed to counter and suppress enemy unmanned aerial vehicles, and have already shown their capabilities. Such complexes are of great interest to the armies, and new deliveries are now expected.

Equipment in the troops


The appearance of Stupor products in parts on the night of July 6 was reported by the TASS agency, citing its source in law enforcement agencies. It is reported that such equipment is already actively used against enemy UAVs in the western part of the DPR, but without specifying the exact areas. "Stupors" are easy to use, and also show high efficiency.



Literally a couple of hours after TASS, Izvestia wrote about the Stupors. In addition, the publication published a short video from the Special Operations zone. On it, a fighter from an unnamed unit showed such a device and spoke about it. In particular, he demonstrated the main method of combat use of "Stupor" and described the resulting effect.


Also on July 6, the RT online publication published an interview with Dmitry Klochko, the founder and head of Location Masterskaya LLC, who developed and produces products of the Stupor series. He told how the new electronic warfare complex was created, how its production was launched and how the finished products ended up in the combat zone. Plans for the future have not yet been disclosed, tk. it all depends on potential customers.

According to D. Klochko, "Stupors" got into the troops at the initiative of the manufacturer. So, in the recent past, the "Location Workshop" sent a dozen such devices to the "Vostok" battalion (DPR) through volunteers. Not all complexes reached the addressee - on the way they somehow got to other "recipients". At the same time, all new operators tested unusual equipment and were satisfied.

UAV suppression complexes have also interested the Russian army. The manufacturing company even received a request from the command of one of the formations to supply several dozen Stupors to equip several units and divisions.


"Stupor" basic version

It is reported that the production of products is still carried out at the expense of the manufacturer, as well as at the expense of sponsorship. D. Klochko expects the latter news will draw attention to new complexes, and the flow of donations will grow. Accordingly, the rate of delivery of devices to our army and the Donbass militia will also increase.

From exhibition to fight


The company "Location workshop" or "Lokmas" was founded in 2016. By this time, its creators already had some experience and developments in the field of electronic warfare systems to counter light commercial UAVs. Based on this experience, a complex with the cipher "Stupor" was soon created. At the same time, it was designated not as an electronic warfare system, but as a “device for activating the rescue mode” (PARS) - this simplified the solution of some bureaucratic issues.

The finished PARS "Stupor" was first presented publicly at the military-technical forum "Army-2017". Like other developments of this class, it attracted the attention of specialists. In addition, law enforcement agencies became interested in the device. So, in 2018, several Stupors were used at the facilities of the World Cup. Also, this technique was tested in Syria. However, a full-fledged order for production for the armed forces or other government organizations never appeared.


Contents of delivery

To date, Lokmas has developed and is producing four variants of the Stupor PARS with different features and characteristics. Due to the correct designation and positioning, they do not belong to military or dual-use products. As a result, the complexes are available for order by any persons and structures - of course, if they are satisfied with the ratio of price and characteristics.

All existing "Stupors" are made in the form factor of a rifle. At the same time, Lokmas is already developing other versions of the system. It is planned to create a similar device in the form of a pistol, as well as larger devices for mounting on automobile or armored platforms. How soon they will appear and be ready for order is not reported.

Technical features


Products of the Stupor series are specialized electronic warfare equipment designed to suppress radio communication / control and navigation channels of commercial UAVs. Not receiving the necessary data or commands, the target drone switches to landing on the spot or returning to the launch point. Depending on various factors, such a switch takes from a few seconds to half a minute.

Regardless of the method of influence and the new mode of operation, the device stops performing its task. Accordingly, the enemy loses the ability to conduct reconnaissance in real time. At the same time, from a tactical point of view, a forced landing is preferable. It allows you to take the UAV as a trophy and remove the necessary information from it.


"Industrial" complex PARS-P

Pars "Stupor" of the basic version is made in a futuristic-looking plastic case 900 mm long and 260 mm high. Weight - 5,5 kg. In the front there is a large antenna casing, behind it is a control handle with a trigger. The back part is designed in the form of a butt with a recoil pad. A collimator sight for aiming is placed on top of the body.

The product is equipped with a 6W transmitter capable of operating in multiple bands. It provides for the suppression of the operating frequencies of the navigation systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and Beidou. Interference is also exhibited at 2,4 GHz and 5,8 GHz frequencies used in radio communications and in the field of UAVs. The radio beam has a width of 15° and affects the target at ranges up to 500 m. The operator can select the operating range corresponding to the observed target. The built-in accumulator provides 4 h of work.

For use on the shore and on the water, the PARS-M device is proposed. It is smaller and lighter, and is also made in a sealed hull with positive buoyancy. There are several ranges, and the radiation power varies between 0,1-3 watts. The smaller capacity battery lasts for 3 hours.

The PARS-P complex is designed for industrial enterprises and takes into account the risk of negative impact on various instruments and infrastructure devices. To this end, the power has been reduced, and the range of effective suppression is limited to 250-300 m - the zone of confident visual recognition of the UAV.


Existing product range

Individuals and organizations are offered a "cottage" device PARS-K, designed to protect small plots and households. It is 490mm long and weighs only 1,6kg, and the 0,1W transmitter only works on 2,4GHz and 5,8GHz. Such characteristics are sufficient to suppress light commercial UAVs of popular models.

Promising direction


In connection with the development and widespread introduction of unmanned aviation different classes, in recent years in our country and abroad there has been an increased interest in various means of combating such equipment. In particular, the direction of specialized portable electronic warfare systems - “anti-drone guns” is being actively developed.

The Russian industry has already developed several samples of such a "weapons". They passed the necessary tests and showed both ease of use and sufficient characteristics to solve the intended tasks. Some samples, as it turns out, are being tested by real operation within the framework of the Special Operation in Ukraine. The combat zone is seriously different from the test site, but even in such conditions, electronic warfare systems cope with the tasks and help the army.

Considering the widest distribution of UAVs and the experience of their operation, it can be assumed that “anti-drone guns” will continue to develop and, as a result, will fully enter the fleet of equipment of our armed forces. Which of the currently existing models will go into service and will help the fighters in the future is unknown. These can be PARS of the Stupor series or any other systems from other domestic enterprises.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    8 July 2022 05: 42
    This is what, it turns out, the washing machines and microwave ovens, which are "en masse exported by Russians" belay during the liberation of the territory laughing
  2. -4
    8 July 2022 05: 50
    designed to suppress radio communication / control and navigation channels commercial UAV

    This thing is only for protection from the paparazzi on private closed beaches.
    1. +7
      8 July 2022 07: 23
      Diversura just loves to use quadrics. Professional military UAVs, such as Bayraktars - leave the anti-aircraft gunners, they know how to work with them. But how to stop the shelling of border guards near Belgorod? Mat?
    2. +10
      8 July 2022 11: 31
      Quote: Nafanya from the couch
      This thing is only for protection from the paparazzi on private closed beaches.

      PMSM, our specialists from the Moscow Region, most likely, reacted like that - they say that normal army UAVs of special design cannot be suppressed by this thing. And in general, let them first make it resistant to the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion and falling onto concrete from a height of 10 meters - and then we'll see. smile

      But no one expected that in the future SVO at the battalion-brigade level, it would be the commercial quadric that would become the main UAV. Vaughn, Moores recently posted a video "Extraction in Lugansk 2: Judgment Day [18+]", in which one of the "Maviks" of the 14th armored personnel carrier of the NM of the LPR "Ghost" hung out over a group of APU-shnikov for half an hour, preventing it from dissolving in the greenery and adjusting the mortar fire. They even tried to shoot him down from the rifle - it's useless.
      Oops... the video has already been taken off the pipe - for violating YouTube's Terms of Service.
      1. +2
        8 July 2022 12: 47
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Oops... the video has already been taken off the pipe - for violating YouTube's Terms of Service.

        In Strelkov's cart, full hd is filled with 1 GB. He often reposts publications from Murza.
  3. 0
    8 July 2022 05: 56
    The future has come when such guns were seen in science fiction films.
    1. +5
      8 July 2022 12: 05
      D. Klochko expects that the latest news will draw attention to new complexes, and the flow of donations will increase. Accordingly, the rate of supply of devices to our army and the Donbass police will also increase.

      The military budget of the Russian Federation is about $ 60 billion, electronic warfare funds are purchased for donations. Yes, not only electronic warfare, quadrics, walkie-talkies, first-aid kits, batteries and other spare parts and components, even for equipment and equipment adopted for service, are also purchased for donations. Surely the grandfathers did not count on such a future.
      It's not even fantasy, it's some kind of surrealism.
      1. -10
        8 July 2022 15: 01
        And the military budget of the Russian Federation was made up taking into account the military formations of the L-DPR? But wasn’t the L-DPR government supposed to take care of equipment for its fighters in 8 years? Or is there something else?
        1. +9
          8 July 2022 17: 02
          Quote: Nikolai Khromov
          And the military budget of the Russian Federation was made up taking into account the military formations of the L-DPR?

          Are we talking about the same People's Militia, whose formations are actually commanded by regular officers of the RF Armed Forces? wink
          Murz in the "KCPN Report" clearly painted - who is hu in NM. Orders in the NM were given by our regulars, and when it came to the execution of their initiatives, the locals took the rap.
          1. 0
            3 September 2022 11: 21
            All 8 years the command was the officers of the Russian Federation? Or since the start? Are you sure you read my post carefully?
            1. 0
              5 September 2022 17: 32
              Quote: Nikolai Khromov
              All 8 years the command was the officers of the Russian Federation?

              Since 2016, when the former freemen were reduced to formally uniform structures. Look at the "Report of the KCPN" - there both a general cut of the "Varangians" is given, and specific characters who have particularly distinguished themselves are indicated.
        2. +5
          8 July 2022 18: 57
          And the military budget of the Russian Federation was made up taking into account the military formations of the L-DPR?

          So LDNR didn’t see much from the Russian military budget. The principle "do not give these new weapons" applies there, at the beginning mobs were handed out mosquitoes as in the first and second world wars. Fortunately, they have now been given Kalash. LDNR art with a caliber of 122mm in the form of decommissioned carnations and d-30 and stuff like that. From the military budget of $ 60 billion, even 1% of the budget cannot be written off for them, with all the desire.
          And as a result, communication and the situation with UAVs are sometimes better organized in the LDNR than in the RF Armed Forces, and all this was done with donations for Novorossia.
          1. 0
            3 September 2022 11: 20
            And where does the information come from?) It always surprises me that here they always know everything as it is. At the same time, no one can substantiate their words. You can throw a proof on a mosquito, something tells me that infa or from dill public?
            1. 0
              5 September 2022 13: 48
              You can drive in YouTube: militias with a Mosin rifle.
              You can google articles.

              In general, who is in the subject, for that it is not news.

              You can search here: https://kenigtiger.livejournal.com/

              At the expense of dill, by the way, they are also fighting with maxims and tar.
  4. 0
    8 July 2022 06: 02
    All means are good when they are useful!
    The VSU officers have already been given something similar and .... silence.
    Now an attempt on our part....
  5. +7
    8 July 2022 06: 42
    Interesting device, thanks for the article.

    Transmitting antenna, emitter, directional action in the segment of the front hemisphere. The transmitting energy is inversely proportional to the square of the distance 1/r^{2}.
    The effectiveness of Stupor, in accordance with the antenna test methodology, is measured with an omnidirectional receiving antenna - this is a reasonable assumption for a UAV communication antenna.

    GPS antennas operate in the segment of the upper hemisphere with reception suppression from the lower hemisphere of the order of 30 dB. So GPS jamming occurs at short distances compared to communication signal jamming (on an omnidirectional antenna) - the GPS signal will be received in this significantly attenuated hemisphere.

    However, if the receiving antenna of the UAV is DIRECTIONAL, and looks into the rear hemisphere ... shielded from radiation in the front hemisphere ... - then the effective distance of the Stupor is reduced. Without shielding, with only a directional receiving antenna in the rear hemisphere, the receiving energy will decrease ~~~ by half, which means the distance will decrease by .7, or 350 meters….

    The UAV can have two or more communication antennas for improved noise immunity: omnidirectional, and protected.

    "Stupor" does not overload the EMP input circuits, but reduces the effective signal-to-noise ratio.

    This is an interesting decision, quite justified in many cases. However, it has limitations.
    1. +2
      8 July 2022 13: 39
      this is against unprotected, unshielded UAVs that do not carry weapons
      If only ours would have made a helicopter UAV, but not a Horizon, but a heavy one based on the Mi-28
      1. -1
        9 July 2022 15: 47
        A UAV based on the Mi-28 is not needed. Only if we're looking for a quick solution. Then yes. And if there is time, it is better to develop from scratch. The absence of a pilot and manual controls, I believe, will seriously affect the overall layout, even if we maintain the same flight characteristics and combat capabilities.
        1. 0
          9 July 2022 18: 04
          a good idea for a helicopter UAV, better with a 4-rack chassis
          with a 30 mm automatic cannon
          ideally, A-220 57 mm in general - but the return cannot be compensated
          NURs 80-mm and 120-mm, ATGMs, URs (willow), KABs, OFABs
          waiting for engines for Ka-62 VK-800
  6. +2
    8 July 2022 07: 21
    That's the thing, but I don't understand why the army is sleeping? The border guards need this vintar right now! The bureaucracy wavered
    1. -8
      8 July 2022 08: 22
      A useless anti-UAV toy from the store.
      1. +9
        8 July 2022 11: 35
        Quote: Victor Sergeev
        A useless anti-UAV toy from the store.

        So they basically fight on the front lines - cheap (compared to special army) mass consumables.
        For the opportunity to kill a civilian buzzer, scorching all movements in real time and giving a picture for adjusting artillery fire, the infantry will give a lot.
    2. -1
      8 July 2022 10: 47
      Probably because the border guards are the FSB.
    3. 0
      8 July 2022 15: 03
      And each squad should be equipped with such a thing, right? Make an anti-UAV platoon?
      1. +5
        8 July 2022 15: 15
        Yes, and supply every patrol on the border with Ukraine with this garbage. Because it's necessary. The walkie-talkie is dragged to the patrol. don't break?
  7. -11
    8 July 2022 08: 21
    It is useless against serious devices. How can I jam the signal from a satellite that comes from above?
    1. +3
      8 July 2022 09: 19
      It is useless against serious devices. How can I jam the signal from a satellite that comes from above?

      Serious BLUAs are able to complete the task without feedback, there are enough algorithms for this case in their "brains"
      But in local conflicts with countries like Ukraine, on both sides they use a lot of commercial drones, the same quadrocopters with tethered 82mm mines, I’m already silent about drones for adjusting fire and local reconnaissance. All these are drones from aliexpress, for them this weapon was created
      1. +5
        8 July 2022 11: 45
        Quote from kristal
        I’m already silent about drones for adjusting fire and local reconnaissance

        Yeah ... here is the UAV, which has become almost standard in NM at the battalion level: smile
      2. +1
        9 July 2022 15: 56
        I think that in the event of a serious conflict, even the US Armed Forces will take up drones from Aliexpress. So in vain you are talking about countries "like Ukraine".
        In general, I agree. There was a video from Syria, how they tried to shoot down a small quadrocopter from Shilka. I don’t remember the result: shot down or not. But the very fact that against a defenseless quadrocopter, which I can personally buy a couple for myself if I wish, I need to roll out a whole Shilka ... I even wonder how much one 30-mm projectile fired by it costs. There is a suspicion that the total firing will cost more than a cheap UAV.
        It is very important to have a specialized tool against alik drones in such conditions. I hope that after the SVO the army will undergo the appropriate modernization.
  8. BAI
    -1
    8 July 2022 09: 09
    If the filling is imported, it will not go to the troops.
  9. +1
    8 July 2022 09: 39
    Just some kind of BFG-9000! Och. looks futuristic love
  10. 0
    8 July 2022 09: 54
    While the theme is dark, it takes time to figure out what this thing is ...
  11. +3
    8 July 2022 11: 02
    I thought I had deja vu...
    An, no
    In the course of a special operation in Ukraine, the latest electromagnetic gun-antidron "Stupor" was used
    July 6 2022

    https://topwar.ru/198654-v-hode-specoperacii-na-ukraine-primeneno-novejshee-jelektromagnitnoe-ruzhe-stupor.html

    The authors have a creative crisis, and the editors are on vacation.

    The product is equipped with a 6W transmitter capable of operating in multiple bands. It provides for the suppression of the operating frequencies of the navigation systems GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and Beidou. ... affects the target at ranges up to 500 m

    belay
    1. At 500 m at the location of the UAV, the signal strength will be jammed
    Рб~Pи/ (4*пи*R^2)~6/(4*3.14* 500*500)~0,000001910828025Вт.
    Yes, there will be a gain of the transmitting antenna, but sharply directed
    Still ~ 6/ ( 500*500)=0,000024W
    Nobody canceled the inverse square law.
    Even if 0,2 milliwatts are bitter tears.
    And even if 100W or 100 kW ... how to jam the signal of the UAV operator from the ground, which is also on the ground

    2. How can this ore, while standing on the ground, jam the signal of a satellite constellation from 30 km, from 000-3 satellites?

    Well mute, okay. The signal is gone, he will return to his operator according to the INS
    1. 0
      8 July 2022 12: 54
      according to item 2 - it is necessary to jam the receiving channels of the satellites. For any jammer, the energy will be higher than that of a UAV.
      1. +1
        8 July 2022 15: 33
        according to clause 2 - it is necessary to jam the receiving channels of satellites

        I understand "from satellites"
        The receiving channel of the satellite cannot be drowned out in any way.
        Here is the "receiving channel" from the satellite.

        Silence!
        You are on the ground UAV in the sky, satellite signal.
        Do you know the properties of parabolic antennas?
        1. 0
          11 July 2022 08: 24
          I understand "from satellites"

          Not correctly understood. It is necessary to jam the receivers that are located on the satellite.
          Only in this case, we "see" the receiving antenna of the satellite and it is difficult for him to tune out from our interference due to the radiation pattern of his receiving antenna. The distances are large, the receiving "spot" will not be small. And chasing every high-altitude UAV with satellite channels is futile.
          An alternative option that is more resistant to interference is low-orbit constellations such as Oneveba - it’s very difficult to jam them, unless you disable satellites, such as “the solar wind blew”.
          By the way, is Oneweb a private office? If a mass death begins over the territory of the Russian Federation, how will the United States react?
    2. +1
      9 July 2022 09: 23
      You have good patience for various opuses, especially for electronic warfare, I have already stopped responding to amateurs. Here is a very good video on how electronic warfare works, for education.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cl7aAAz0Cuc&list=LL&index=96&t=1114s
  12. -1
    8 July 2022 13: 28
    Which is very good but there is a big nuance. To use it, you need to send it directly to the drone. But this is a big difficulty, because it is not easy to detect a small drone against the sky. even your own drone if you lose sight of it is not easy to notice
  13. 0
    8 July 2022 13: 46
    The war in / in Ukraine is the first in which various drones are used in large numbers. Surely, appropriate conclusions will be drawn and, pah-pah, do not jinx it, in the future our guys will have "real" drones that cannot be introduced into the "Stupor".
    PS And, actually, thanks to the volunteers who responded so quickly to the requests of our warring guys.
  14. 0
    8 July 2022 13: 47
    Since the Moscow Region cannot offer something of its own, let it buy these devices.
    It is very necessary to hide from enemy UAVs.
  15. +1
    8 July 2022 17: 03
    Quote: Alexey RA
    Quote: Nafanya from the couch
    This thing is only for protection from the paparazzi on private closed beaches.

    PMSM, our specialists from the Moscow Region, most likely, reacted like that - they say that normal army UAVs of special design cannot be suppressed by this thing. And in general, let them first make it resistant to the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion and falling onto concrete from a height of 10 meters - and then we'll see. smile

    But no one expected that in the future SVO at the battalion-brigade level, it would be the commercial quadric that would become the main UAV. Vaughn, Moores recently posted a video "Extraction in Lugansk 2: Judgment Day [18+]", in which one of the "Maviks" of the 14th armored personnel carrier of the NM of the LPR "Ghost" hung out over a group of APU-shnikov for half an hour, preventing it from dissolving in the greenery and adjusting the mortar fire. They even tried to shoot him down from the rifle - it's useless.
    Oops... the video has already been taken off the pipe - for violating YouTube's Terms of Service.

    Or maybe everything is more banal - someone in the Moscow Region, on whom / on whom the adoption of a product into service depends, is just waiting ... a rollback from the developer company? winked
    1. -1
      9 July 2022 16: 43
      Yes, not necessarily. A completely realistic story of a skeptical attitude towards new types of weapons, which is found everywhere and has the right to exist even without the corruption factor.
  16. 0
    8 July 2022 19: 47
    I wonder how safe this device is for its operator
  17. -2
    8 July 2022 22: 58
    Useless thing along the way. Drones fly much higher than 500 meters.
  18. +1
    9 July 2022 13: 45
    It's amazing, of course. Such a promising and innovative means of electronic warfare was absolutely unnecessary for our troops before the NWO.
  19. 0
    9 July 2022 18: 45
    It's a little discouraging that you have to sting between jets to do something useful, right?
    And the second thought: 5kg is not so hard for ... a drone. Why don't they develop a model for a drone? Why are there all sorts of shotguns, nets, foams, if it is possible to robotize detection and prevention at this base? Detector network + high-speed drone will help to detect and stop penetration 24/7 in advance. And he won’t go to the toilet and won’t be distracted by the phone with his wife.
  20. -2
    11 July 2022 23: 00
    500 meters is about nothing, so a scarecrow for commercial UAVs. For combat UAVs, serious electronic warfare equipment is needed, which they talked about a lot before the SVO, but when it came to the point, they were not heard of. And Bandera’s mobile communications work, and the Internet, and satellite communications and counter-battery radars and their drones hang over the heads of our soldiers and correct artillery fire ..
    1. 0
      12 July 2022 18: 22
      Quote from TreeSmall
      Silence!
      You are on the ground UAV in the sky, satellite signal.
      Do you know the properties of parabolic antennas?

      If the jammer is, for example, on the M-55 "Geophysics", flying at a height of 21-22 km, that is, above the UAV, then it is quite possible to interfere with the satellite dish, the one in the picture.
  21. 0
    15 September 2022 18: 32
    rubbish, 1 to hit a drone from it you need to detect it first, 99 out of 100 that the drone will detect you first and will beat off its budget with this 2, instead of dragging this nonsense with batteries, it’s better to take heels of mavics or RPG or PKM or a backpack with cartridges if you have extra people in the detachment, it may make sense to put him on guard at the headquarters, but as they already wrote here, where is the vaunted radio warfare that was supposed to intercept and hack everything? besides, you put a duty officer with this garbage / and by the way, nightlights go on fat mavics at night, how? / and after how many tens of minutes, instead of staring at the sky, will he start to miss at least looking at the bushes? well, I won’t be surprised about the price if it costs like 50 mavics with nightlights

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"