Little or a lot. Quantitative aspects of foreign military-technical assistance for Ukraine

28
Little or a lot. Quantitative aspects of foreign military-technical assistance for Ukraine

A batch of NLAW grenade launchers. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

In recent months, foreign countries have been massively transferring various weapons and military equipment to Ukraine. Such military-technical assistance covers many areas and includes products of various classes. At the same time, there is a certain imbalance. So, some areas are given increased attention, and large quantities of products are delivered, while other systems arrive in insufficient quantities or remain at the level of promises.

Infantry weapons


The bulk of deliveries in terms of quantity is made up of a variety of weapons for the infantry and ground forces. First of all, these are anti-tank missile systems and grenade launchers of a number of types. According to recent reports, approx. 70 thousand such products. This number includes approx. 10 thousand American FGM-148 Javelin ATGMs, up to 7 thousand British NLAWs and about 1 thousand German Panzerfaust 3. Foreign countries also shipped outdated RPGs and ATGMs of a number of types.



Several NATO countries supply Ukrainian formations with MANPADS at once. First of all, these are American FIM-92 Stingers in the amount of more than 3 thousand units. In addition, Germany found 2,7 thousand old Soviet Strela-2s in warehouses, a significant part of which are unusable. The UK helped with the supply of its Starstreak missiles in a portable version and on a self-propelled air defense system.


Party weapons and other products from Greece, February 2022. Photo by the Greek Ministry of Defense

The supply of small arms continues. For example, Greece provided 20 Soviet-style assault rifles, Belgium supplied 5 old automatic rifles, and Germany sent a hundred machine guns. Smaller shipments also arrived from other countries. Various countries sent a total of several tens of millions of cartridges of various types. The Bundeswehr and other armies were able to allocate at least 100 hand grenades.

Armored Assistance


The first promises about the transfer of armored fighting vehicles were made back in January, but the actual deliveries began later. At the same time, there are problems of limited supply volumes and de-unification of equipment, and the most necessary and important samples simply do not fall into aid projects.

To date, Poland and the Czech Republic have allocated about 280-300 tanks T-72 old modifications. Despite all the requests, other tanks, incl. modern models have not yet been obtained and probably will not work in the future.

A limited number of infantry fighting vehicles, also old models, are expected. These are more than 120 BMP-1s from Greece, less than a dozen Czech BVP-1s, and up to 36 M-80As from Slovenia. At the same time, the United States and several other countries sent up to 330 obsolete M113 armored personnel carriers. The Netherlands supplies similar machines YPR-756. It was reported that 300 such items could be transferred, but the actual volume of deliveries is much less. Canada recently announced a future shipment of 39 newer LAV III armored personnel carriers.


Polish T-72M tanks on their way to Ukraine, April 2022. Photo by Telegram / ChDambiev

Of great interest are the deliveries of armored vehicles. A number of countries in one quantity or another transmit such equipment of different models with different characteristics and capabilities. Thus, the UK allocated 120 armored vehicles of several types. Smaller batches come from other countries. For example, Estonia sent a total of 7 Mamba Mk 2 vehicles.

Artillery and rockets


Foreign countries are trying to help the Kyiv regime with the supply of cannon and rocket artillery. At first, such assistance was limited and faced challenges. Thus, Estonia took quite a long time to issue a permit for the transfer of only 9 D-30 howitzers. Then a number of countries, by joint efforts, scored only a few hundred mortars of various calibers. At the same time, deliveries of artillery ammunition, first of the Soviet type, began in February.

In the future, deliveries of towed artillery continued. Several countries, mainly the United States, have contributed more than 110 M777 howitzers, as well as 150-200 thousand rounds for them. Italy and Estonia donated an unnamed number of FH-70 guns.

The supply of self-propelled systems attracted much attention, but they are much smaller. Thus, Belgium and Norway transferred to Ukraine about 30 M109 self-propelled guns of various modifications. 20 Dana products arrived from the Czech Republic; from Poland - 18 Krab cars. France allocated no more than 15-20 units. ACS CAESAR. After long promises, Germany and the Netherlands handed over only 12 PzH 2000 vehicles to the Kyiv regime.


A batch of American M777 guns, May 2022. Photo by the US Department of Defense

The same is true with rocket artillery. Practically from February-March, foreign states sent rounds for such systems to Ukraine, but were in no hurry to ship combat vehicles. Only later, the Czech Republic and Greece handed over several dozen old RM-70 MLRS. A few weeks ago, the process of transferring American-made M270 and M142 products began. The total volume of these deliveries does not exceed 10-12 units, a few more machines are only promised so far.

Aviation and air defense


An interesting situation is observed in the field aviation technology and air systems. Foreign countries supply many different unmanned aerial vehicles free of charge and on a commercial basis. 30-40 Turkish Bayraktar TB2 UAVs received a lot of publicity and dubious fame. Hundreds of reconnaissance vehicles of various types have arrived from a number of countries. The US and allies are also supplying hundreds of loitering munitions such as the Switchblade 300/600 or the Phoenix Ghost.

In the field of manned aviation, the situation is worse. In fact, only a few Mi-17 helicopters, previously destined for Afghanistan, have been handed over. The possibility of supplying combat aircraft and helicopters was repeatedly mentioned, but such proposals did not come to fruition. Moreover, several potential suppliers openly refused to share aircraft.

At the same time, deliveries of anti-aircraft weapons are going on, and they also face characteristic difficulties. So, Slovakia shipped S-300P air defense systems, but these products were destroyed before they were put on duty. Germany has not yet handed over the long-promised Gepard ZSU and their ammunition. She also announced the delivery of IRIS-T air defense systems - but only when they are manufactured. They are not going to transfer cash items from the park of their own army. Also in the plans remains the delivery of the NASAMS complex.


British armored car Wolfhound at the Ukrainian training ground. Photo Telegram / BMPD

On the water and on the shore


Ukraine has almost lost its naval forces, but attempts are still being made to restore them. Thus, foreign shipyards continue to fulfill previously placed orders for the construction of boats of various types. At the same time, the timely execution of such orders is not guaranteed, and it is not clear whether the current Kyiv regime will have time to receive them.

In particular, small patrol boats of the Defiant and Fearless projects are being built right now in the United States. Six units of such equipment are planned to be transferred to Ukraine in the near future, as part of the latest aid package. Then a batch of 17 more boats is expected.

Attempts are being made to strengthen the defense of the coast with the help of missile weapons. So, a couple of obsolete coastal complexes with Harpoon missiles were received from Denmark. The UK has provided 200 modern Brimstone missiles for ground use. Plans have been reported for the supply of French Exocet PCs, but they have not yet been implemented.

More ambitious plans are being made, but they do not have real prospects. Thus, the possibility of transferring LCS “littoral ships” to Ukraine is being discussed. Obviously, in its current state, the Ukrainian Navy will not be able to master and put into operation such a complex “gift”.

Noticeable difference


Thus, foreign countries are trying to send various military-technical assistance to Ukraine, but in fact the situation looks more complicated and interesting. In some areas, active and massive deliveries are taking place, in others, slower rates are observed, and in some areas, everything is still reduced to single deliveries and loud promises.


One of the Slovenian BMP M-80A for Ukraine, June 2022. Photo Telegram / BMPD

The United States and its European allies have so far performed well only in the supply of infantry weapons. Tens of thousands of small arms and anti-tank missile systems were shipped to the Kyiv regime. Despite the limited or even dubious effect, such supplies may continue.

In the field of ground equipment and weapons, as well as in the field of aviation, the situation looks ambiguous. The absolute number of products delivered is quite large, at least hundreds. However, this is not enough to cover all the needs of the Ukrainian army, especially given the losses incurred and the ongoing damage. The supply of tens or hundreds of thousands of ammunition looks quite large, but is also not of decisive importance.

In some areas, assistance is virtually non-existent. Despite all the promises, Ukraine has not yet received modern tanks and air defense systems, combat aircraft or ships. The timing of the transfer of such assistance has been repeatedly postponed. At the same time, there is reason to believe that some types of products will not be shipped at all.

Obvious reasons


In general, a fairly simple and obvious trend is visible. Foreign states are ready to transfer quickly and in large quantities only relatively cheap products that are available in parts and in warehouses in large quantities. In other cases, at least temporary difficulties arise, and in some areas, deliveries are excluded in principle.


German air defense system IRIS-T. Photo by Diehl Defense

In addition to economics, there are also political reasons. Foreign military and political leadership suggests that modern weapons and equipment pose a particular danger to the Russian army, and their appearance will cause an undesirable reaction. In this regard, modern rocket or artillery systems, if they are supplied, are only in limited quantities.

Thus, it is obvious that foreign "allies" of Ukraine provide assistance only taking into account their own interests. They are not at all willing to sacrifice their own security and budgets - even while demonstrating loyalty to Washington and Kyiv. This circumstance affects the plans and the course of actual deliveries, and also makes it possible to predict what further military-technical assistance will be.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    5 July 2022 04: 52
    Such assistance takes up large volumes and you cannot put it in your pocket, like a revolver. How can she enter Ukraine so freely?
    1. -4
      5 July 2022 05: 31
      Who said it's free? The Americans have already said several times at the level of the White House that part of it is destroyed even before it enters the battles. Part is destroyed later.
      1. Eug
        +1
        5 July 2022 05: 43
        And a part is resold far beyond the borders of Ukraine...
        1. 0
          5 July 2022 05: 55
          I'm sure it is. After the story with the Cesar, probably 100 percent already.
          1. +9
            5 July 2022 07: 13
            What is the article about? It has already been said everywhere that all deliveries are small and everything was destroyed. I'm going to throw my hat on too.
            1. -4
              5 July 2022 07: 20
              Where did they say? Who said? You are confusing something.
              1. +3
                5 July 2022 08: 05
                How many such articles have there been on VO. You can search. About Polish tanks. About 3 axes... and so on...
                1. -1
                  5 July 2022 08: 10
                  And who said that they were all destroyed, I asked.
            2. +7
              5 July 2022 09: 59
              Quote: Civil
              What is the article about? It has already been said everywhere that all deliveries are small and everything was destroyed. I'm going to throw my hat on too.

              All 4,5 months on the VO only “Uryayaya!” ... deliveries of anti-tank systems are useless, but the T-62s have already been taken out of warehouses (and yes, even they with “chicken coops” from Jewels, MANPADS are useless, but even helicopters are increasingly working from a roll-up, we are not afraid of the American MLRS, but after the delivery, the Snake also became uninteresting, the M-777 and other art installations + counter-battery radars are rubbish, but from the front line they report that the Ukrainian art does not give rest and they got “grads” based on everything that there are half a century ago ... Iskanders and calibers are still a sea, but more and more often we shoot outdated anti-ship missiles with KVO under 600m ... in general, we are not afraid of the gray wolf, this is all our "good will"
    2. +3
      5 July 2022 08: 37
      The article contains photos. They put it on a trailer and drove it, what's wrong with you?
  2. -2
    5 July 2022 04: 54
    Kirill, exactly as many weapons and ammunition were sent as they considered necessary to give as part of the internal programs for the disposal of old weapons. Be generous with the new
    the minimum, because they know well what kind of fruits the consignees of the nationalists know. The new costs money, the only hope is for the complete confiscation of our frozen funds ....
    1. +6
      5 July 2022 05: 20
      "Allies" of Ukraine provide assistance only taking into account their own interests.
      Yes, and what is delivered brings death ... The whole world is arming the Armed Forces of Ukraine against Russia! am
  3. -4
    5 July 2022 04: 55
    Well, dill can master? Shooter, ATGM / MANPADS, artillery - everything, the rest must be taught. Climb over there on the Firebomber - he posted there about announcements for hiring pilots there, they don’t care anymore, they don’t have a license, age - yes, any - this despite the fact that they took down all the aircraft from the sky, but they don’t supply new ones - even for these fragments of flyers they have Not anymore. put, God forbid, but suddenly - 10 F-16 - who will fly? Lyusya Arestovich with Monika Selyansky? They don't need a fighter jet to fly.
    The same goes for other complex equipment. Do you think the Turks are all fools that they deployed the delivered S-400 kit for so long? And they probably began to be taught even BEFORE the launchers were brought, right? And how long will it take to deploy the same Patriots?
    1. Eug
      +10
      5 July 2022 05: 49
      I would not underestimate the ability of the Ukrainian military to master new technology. In the same ter.batah, there are many who are fluent in foreign languages, with higher and secondary education. And there was a lot of computerized agricultural equipment in Ukraine, and someone exploited it ...
      1. -1
        5 July 2022 06: 44
        Quote: Eug
        In the same ter.batah, there are many who are fluent in foreign languages, with higher and secondary education.

        You are joking now, right? I have two educations - an SS and a tower, but I didn’t understand shit with a mortar, Soviet, English, by the way, I know it so that I taught at a university - will this help me a lot at the remote control of the air defense system?
      2. +6
        5 July 2022 06: 44
        It's not just about education and knowledge of languages, it's about skills, and it takes time to develop them.
    2. +2
      5 July 2022 06: 43
      I think that you need to be completely frostbitten to get hired as a pilot in the Armed Forces of Ukraine. One way road. The Patriots will not deliver, even if there are trained personnel for the complex from the Armed Forces of Ukraine, there is a great chance of being captured by our army. What they can master in a short period of time is artillery barrel systems, MLRS, MANPADS, ATGMs, but not all and not all.
      1. +4
        5 July 2022 12: 15
        You did not take into account the training of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which has been conducted since 2015 in different countries and continues to be trained. In addition, take into account mercenaries from all over the world and trained from various PMCs. shelling from Western weapons. Here's trash and old samples for you.
  4. -3
    5 July 2022 05: 45
    Thus, it is obvious that foreign "allies" of Ukraine provide assistance only taking into account their own interests.

    By and large, they are on the outskirts and ... did not give up
  5. -2
    5 July 2022 05: 48
    All is well, beautiful marquise...
    Everything is gone..
    The plaster was removed, the client left
  6. 0
    5 July 2022 08: 35
    Well, there were deliveries of aircraft. A certain number of MiG - 29 and Su - 25 hit Banderland. Otherwise, they would no longer fly.
  7. 0
    5 July 2022 09: 01
    The stakes in the game are so high that they will give the dill as many weapons and money as they can carry. But they won’t give you a completely new one - so as not to risk getting to us for disassembly. And study.
    1. 0
      5 July 2022 10: 43
      Whatever it was, but the supply of weapons to Ukraine is continuous and despite any losses, its number does not decrease in any way. If the special operation lasts for a year or more, then Ukraine can be thoroughly pumped with weapons of various kinds, it is very likely that most of it will accumulate in its western part on the borders with Russia and Belarus.
  8. +1
    5 July 2022 10: 51
    allocated more than 110 M777 howitzers for help, as well as 150-200 thousand rounds for them

    M4.2 itself weighs 777 tons (i.e. total tonnage 4.2 * 110 = at least 422 tons)
    An Excalibur-type projectile weighs about 48 kg, unguided counterparts weigh from 40 kg, there is a tendency for guided ones to weigh under or over 50 kg. That is, in the calculations it can be assumed that the average projectile for the M777 weighs 45 kg. (i.e. total tonnage 150 * 000kg = 45 tons)

    Considering the specifics of the transportation of shells, I can assume that this was a very large cargo in every sense, and it was either relatively easy to detect by intelligence, either at the transportation stage or at the accumulation stage.
    Let's assume that the shells were transported by standard container trucks. The truck takes out from 35 to 50 tons, let's take the figure of 35 tons for an EXTREMELY APPROXIMATE estimate. Only for shells comes out a figure of 200 machine flights. At a minimum. Whether it's a lot or a little, I'm not going to speculate.
    All this I estimate in order to form a rough idea of ​​our ability or inability to stop this kind of supply in the past and now.

    Transportation specifically of howitzers is unlikely. Ammunition - quite. In case of destruction of part of the railway infra. in a number of directions, we could direct the enemy to deliveries along a more predictable choice of routes, where to destroy them, having previously identified the preparation of transportation by reconnaissance. After all, we have intelligence in the EU, don't we? Rather, it SHOULD BE for such cases. Or the enemy would use motor vehicles for transportation - this would also be possible, as already mentioned above, this is about 200 vehicle flights (for shells, at a minimum). The fight against this is already more difficult, here you can use cars of a smaller load tonnage, launch them in small batches along a larger number of routes. It can be difficult to prevent this. However, forcing the enemy to do this would slow down his supply OR force him to use more predictable solutions that are easier to intercept.

    I summarize - perhaps we could not stop the supply of shells, but we could, to a certain extent, direct the actions of the enemy in a more convenient direction for us, at least we could slow down these deliveries.

    The second solution to the problem is not to interfere with deliveries, trying to carefully analyze routes and collect as much information as possible. The cargo is destroyed not at the stage of transportation, but at the stage of accumulation or preparation for further transportation and distribution. In my opinion, this is a much more effective tactic in terms of spending forces, because the enemy is forced to use large hub sorting points, or a chain of small decentralized storage facilities, mostly much less prepared for these tasks.
    The former can and should be destroyed by the KR, the latter by various aviation weapons.
    Will this solve the problem? No, but it will greatly disorganize the enemy, force him to work in small batches of supplies, spend more fuel, load the transport fleet more. In combination with knocking out the fuel infrastructure, the effect will be stronger.

    I summarize - The second solution also does not completely close the problem, but allows us to use our advantages better and, most importantly, more economically. Knocking out cargo in transportation is less convenient for us, the destruction of an array of infrastructure is unlikely to solve the problem, while requiring serious weapons costs. The destruction of the accumulation infrastructure and fuel storages, therefore, seems to me the most universal strategy for dealing with the problem, given the scale of the NWO and the available funds.
    This will NOT solve the problem, but it can drastically reduce it and stretch it out over time.
  9. +1
    5 July 2022 12: 07
    Kirill, about air defense, I’m clarifying the Italian “Aspid” and the Spanish “Spada” from the UK “Starshrek”. And this is not enough. Moreover, it’s not yet clear where they are in Poland or already in Ukraine. problems. You really need to approach any supply of weapons. But I already wrote that the main thing is not weapons, but money. Only serious financing of the regime allows Kyiv to behave with impunity.
  10. -2
    5 July 2022 18: 21
    Foreign states are ready to transfer quickly and in large quantities only relatively cheap products

    Zele needs to beg somewhere else in Timbuktu, a batch of relatively cheap gnarled clubs will be in place.
  11. -2
    5 July 2022 19: 26
    Recycling is over. It is scary to supply new weapons, for example, Turkish UAVs have shown strength where there is no air defense, and if f16 or f35 are called, like the Turks, to modern Russian or Belarusian air defense. Then what to sell? Good question. We will help with the decision, we will have to sell Russian weapons. So the gifts to Ukraine are over. Now NATO will gradually be squeezed out all over the world, since there is no worthy weaponry that could resist ours. So the collapse of NATO is not over the hill, washed away like an unnecessary creature.
  12. -1
    8 July 2022 09: 45
    Quote: Luminman
    How can she enter Ukraine so freely?

    Good question!
    The sky over 404 is ours, and the Bendera people, defiantly, in the daytime, receive caravans of military equipment from the west. Strange situation. Why are we waiting for the Nazis to bombard Donetsk with 155mm shells, so that later, in righteous anger, they brand not people? Why are the countries that supply equipment and ammunition that kill our soldiers and civilians still not punished? Why were the troops withdrawn from the captured bridgeheads? This is some deja vu! As in Grozny, when the Jew Berezovsky and Lebed signed a truce, although Grozny was taken by our troops. Imagine Zhukov, in May 1945, signing an armistice in Berlin with the Germans. Deja vu. Jew Abramovich, in Turkey he decided everything, as Berezovsky did in his time?

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"