The Russian Aerospace Forces destroyed a military unit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Odessa with an accurate missile strike

70

It is reported about the arrival of Kh-22 missiles, fired by the Russian strategic long-range bomber Tu-22M3, at a military facility in the Odessa region. It is reported that only two were produced. aviation rockets. According to the Ukrainian side - the operational command "South" - one missile was shot down by Ukrainian air defense systems. The second missile reached its target, as a result of which the military unit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, located in the village of Avangard, Ovidiopol district, not far from Odessa, was hit. Depots with ammunition, fuel, military equipment and manpower of the enemy have been liquidated.

While Western leaders at the next summit scatter threats against Moscow and figure out how else to help Kyiv in the "fair fight against the aggressor", our troops continue to systematically clean up enemy military installations and manpower. The success of high-precision weapons The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation are already forced to recognize the representatives of the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Although, of course, with reservations, like "one downed missile."



In general, the number of shelling of air, land and sea-based precision weapons by our army has recently increased significantly. Earlier, the Russian Armed Forces carried out night-time missile strikes on an ammunition depot near the village of Mayaki near Odessa. According to the Russian Ministry of Defense, it is clear that over the past few days dozens of military facilities have been destroyed in the territory controlled by the enemy.

In this regard, the Ukrainians themselves have a lot of questions to the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Where is the promised layered and highly effective air defense and missile defense system capable of creating a reliable dome at least over strategically important settlements and military bases? Why is the promise repeatedly announced by the Kyiv authorities that the RF Armed Forces “will run out of high-precision missiles” never come true?

In response, the command of the Air Force of the Armed Forces of Ukraine can only make excuses: "The air defense worked out as much as possible."
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

70 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    29 June 2022 16: 55
    Excellent!! The systematic destruction of the enemy troops goes on as usual! Work, take care of yourself!
    1. +9
      29 June 2022 17: 13
      The promised and still "reliable dome" remained only in the circus from where this bloodthirsty clown Zelya broadcasts)) but this issue is also in the process of being resolved))
      1. +7
        29 June 2022 17: 19
        reliable dome

        This dome, if it exists, is only because this clown has not yet been hit by rockets ...
        1. +2
          29 June 2022 18: 45
          The Armed Forces of Ukraine can only make excuses: "The air defense has worked out as much as possible."

          I hope that there will be no one to justify and work out there.
        2. 0
          30 June 2022 15: 57
          One question - why don't they come? It's time already.
  2. +5
    29 June 2022 16: 59
    The news is good, but ... "the arrival of X-22 missiles fired by the Russians" and then - "one missile was shot down" ... What do we have with cases? Where are the editors?
    1. +6
      29 June 2022 17: 21
      Where. Everywhere))
  3. +1
    29 June 2022 17: 02
    According to the "statement" of one Bulgarian, we should have run out of all missiles today. Well, for the "zahisniks" of Odessa (rather finished losses).
    1. 0
      29 June 2022 17: 04
      No, Grozev said that on Sunday we will run out of rockets!)) There are still a few days to frolic!))
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. +3
    29 June 2022 17: 04
    It seems to me that the X22 has a more powerful high-explosive part than that of Caliber. Although the X22 is more fun to burrow into concrete, because of its speed. But the hole is decent.
    1. +18
      29 June 2022 17: 10
      Of course - she has a warhead under a ton ... It will explode - it won’t seem enough .. True, the rocket has already exceeded half a century - and look, it’s still flying. Still, in the USSR they knew how to make excellent products .. Despite the assurances of some to the contrary ..
      1. +8
        29 June 2022 17: 14
        With one rocket and ammunition, and fuels and lubricants, and equipment, and manpower?
        1. R
          +5
          30 June 2022 01: 53
          With one rocket and ammunition, and fuels and lubricants, and equipment, and manpower?

          Well, let's say, in our unit, fuel and lubricant depots, a vehicle fleet and ammunition depots were very close, in the area of ​​​​the 2nd checkpoint. And the guards, respectively, constantly "hung out" there. Plus "fuel oil" (they are also "bolts", they are the same - "carriers"))) If we simulate the arrival of one-ton explosives in the center of an imaginary circle between these objects, then everyone would be "hooked" there - both equipment and warehouses with fuel , and ammunition, and personnel. Perhaps a unit with the same "standard" Soviet layout (architecture) as in my brigade flew to the kakelas.
        2. 0
          30 June 2022 16: 47
          They showed a video of how this rocket is being dug up in the middle of the field. https://t.me/xydessa/21335
      2. 0
        29 June 2022 17: 45
        So, too, our "galoshes" are bullets, and we have them in every village, apparently-invisibly. It will be worse for ukrov when our VKS switches to "simple rubber boots and even swamps".
      3. +6
        29 June 2022 20: 33
        Quote: paul3390
        Still, in the USSR they knew how to make excellent products .. Despite the assurances of some to the contrary ..

        Off topic: yesterday I changed the bearings and brushes on the 1986 Whirlwind vacuum cleaner. - the unit went berserk - sucks socks that scattered his son ...
        1. The comment was deleted.
      4. +2
        30 June 2022 06: 50
        Now the arrestovich will again tell Gordon that the air defense shot down 101 missiles out of 102 launched. And only one accidentally slipped through and ended up in a hospital with a kindergarten.
      5. -1
        30 June 2022 15: 09
        Quote: paul3390
        True, the rocket is already half a century old

        Well, it’s not at all a fact that this x-22 this missile is still not so accurate, it may turn out to be x-32, but it has a weaker warhead, although more accurate
    2. +5
      29 June 2022 17: 17
      The Kh-22 Burya warhead 960 kg against the KR Caliber warhead 450 kg. So compare the force of the explosion on my video .. see below for a comment on the impact in Kremenchug. There's a clear video of the hit.
      1. +6
        29 June 2022 17: 42
        In Kremenchug, it seems that the same missiles (Kh-22 or Kh-32) were used.
        Kremenchuk:

        X-22
        Flight altitude: 11,5-12,5 km and 22,5-25 km
        Length: 11,65-11,67 m
        Diameter: 0,9-0,92 m
        Rocket height: 1,81 m (keel folded)
        Wing span: 2,99-3,0 (3,35) m
        Starting weight: 5635-5780 kg
        Flight speed: M = 3,5-4,6 (from Mach 5 - hypersonic class)
        Firing Range: 140-300 (460-600) km
        Application height: 10 (11-12) km
        Guidance system: ARLGSN or PRLGSN or inertial PSI
        Warhead:
        thermonuclear 350 kt - 1 Mt
        high-explosive-cumulative 9A-22. Warhead weight - 960 kg. With a compartment of 1000 kg, weight BB-630 kg, type BB TGAG-5. The cumulative jet is directed downwards by 45°
        1. 0
          29 June 2022 17: 59
          I know .. I gave the alignment below
          1. +6
            29 June 2022 18: 10
            In the morning, when I saw a video of the strike on Kremenchug, I took a screenshot of the outline of the rocket, and when a topic about them appeared on VO, I published it. Only later, having gone further on the topic, I saw that I was ahead of me with this. I did not delete my message, since no one published the contours of the rocket diving into the warehouses, but the conclusions, yes, were made here even before me.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +2
          29 June 2022 19: 15
          Quote: Bad_gr
          In Kremenchug, it seems that the same missiles (Kh-22 or Kh-32) were used.
          Kremenchuk:

          X-22
          Flight altitude: 11,5-12,5 km and 22,5-25 km
          Length: 11,65-11,67 m
          Diameter: 0,9-0,92 m
          Rocket height: 1,81 m (keel folded)
          Wing span: 2,99-3,0 (3,35) m
          Starting weight: 5635-5780 kg
          Flight speed: M = 3,5-4,6 (from Mach 5 - hypersonic class)
          Firing Range: 140-300 (460-600) km
          Application height: 10 (11-12) km
          Guidance system: ARLGSN or PRLGSN or inertial PSI
          Warhead:
          thermonuclear 350 kt - 1 Mt
          high-explosive-cumulative 9A-22. Warhead weight - 960 kg. With a compartment of 1000 kg, weight BB-630 kg, type BB TGAG-5. The cumulative jet is directed downwards by 45°


          In an adjacent thread, it is clarified that
          The X-22 is not currently in service. All good X-22s were converted into X-32s.
          1. +1
            1 July 2022 14: 23
            Hello. I don't know much about rockets. You can tell X-22 is pronounced like "he" or "x". Thank you)
            1. +1
              2 July 2022 05: 46
              Ha-22 rather
        4. 0
          29 June 2022 20: 28
          thanks for the info
        5. 0
          30 June 2022 06: 53
          The decommunization of suckers is in full swing. At the same time, the old Soviet rocket was disposed of.
      2. +2
        29 June 2022 20: 27
        The Kh-22 Burya warhead 960 kg against the KR Caliber warhead 450 kg. So compare the force of the explosion

        Why compare? Can be counted. The radius of the same impact will increase in
        1,25 times (cube root of 2)
        And judging by the message (both manpower, equipment and warehouses), they held an open party meeting and a flash mob in a warehouse with ammunition, putting in a pile of infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers that they arrived in.
        Well, for comparison. BC is about the same.
        The combat use of V-2 missiles began on September 5, 1944 - 2 missiles were fired in the direction of Paris. After 3 days, the shelling of London began. 2 rockets were fired - the first one killed 3 and wounded 17 people, the second did not cause any damage. In total, about 27 V-1945 units were fired in England until March 1300, 2, from which 2724 people died and 6467 were injured
        1. R
          +2
          30 June 2022 02: 08
          And judging by the message (both manpower, equipment and warehouses), they held an open party meeting and a flash mob in a warehouse with ammunition, putting in a pile of infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers that they arrived in.


          I wrote above, I repeat: in our unit, fuel and lubricant depots, a vehicle fleet and ammunition depots were very close, in the area of ​​​​the 2nd checkpoint. And the guards, respectively, constantly "hung out" there. Plus "fuel oil" (they are also "bolts", they are the same - "carriers"))) If we simulate the arrival of one-ton explosives in the center of an imaginary circle between these objects, then everyone would be "hooked" there - both equipment and warehouses with fuel , and ammunition, and personnel. Perhaps a unit with the same "standard" Soviet layout (architecture) as in my brigade flew to the kakelas.
          1. +1
            30 June 2022 04: 35
            Perhaps a unit with the same "standard" Soviet layout (architecture) as in my brigade flew to the kakelas.

            Do you hold the enemy for sheep? They won’t guess to disperse and relocate?
  6. +4
    29 June 2022 17: 07
    The fact that the HQS does not disregard the Odessa region is very important.
    1. +8
      29 June 2022 17: 49
      Quote: v1tz
      The fact that the HQS does not disregard the Odessa region is very important.

      This is true. But it's time to "take care" of the Lvov, Ivano-Frankivsk, and Chernihiv regions. Is there really not a single Natsik military facility there? It cannot be that in the homeland of dill nationalism for our VKS there was no worthy goal! It's time to please the Nazis in their native "witchy" land with the "wrath of the orcs"!
      Debt good turn deserves another! Peremozhniki-Nezalezhniki are yellow-blaky! Come and get what is due for tears, blood and lives of Donbass / Lugovians .. with interest! am
      1. 0
        29 June 2022 18: 17
        Yes, that's right. Now, if the beginning of the NMD were carried out in those regions, cutting off the entire territory from the supply of the West, but this is impossible: although
      2. -1
        29 June 2022 20: 30
        Yes, but they don't seem to forget.
        But, the hint about Kyiv, it seems, was not quite understood.
  7. 0
    29 June 2022 17: 07
    In this regard, the Ukrainians themselves have a lot of questions to the command of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
    . Questions are asked by "simple" ... just an inhabitant of Kukuevskaya, hoping for something else.
  8. +1
    29 June 2022 17: 13
    Depots with ammunition, fuel, military equipment and manpower of the enemy have been liquidated.

    one or two rockets? It seems that the outfit of missiles is too small for such a task.
    1. R
      +1
      30 June 2022 02: 10
      one or two rockets? It seems that the outfit of missiles is too small for such a task.


      I wrote twice above, but I’m not too lazy to repeat myself)) :

      in our unit, fuel depots, a vehicle fleet and ammunition depots were very close, in the area of ​​​​the 2nd checkpoint. And the guards, respectively, constantly "hung out" there. Plus "fuel oil" (they are also "bolts", they are the same - "carriers"))) If we simulate the arrival of one-ton explosives in the center of an imaginary circle between these objects, then everyone would be "hooked" there - both equipment and warehouses with fuel , and ammunition, and personnel. Perhaps a unit with the same "standard" Soviet layout (architecture) as in my brigade flew to the kakelas.
  9. +8
    29 June 2022 17: 14
    Video of the impact in Kremenchug. Judging by the still images, I identified the missile as the Kh-22 Burya air-launched cruise missile or an upgraded version of the Kh-32. The only carrier of these missiles is the Tu-22M3 - it is primarily imprisoned for this missile ... with recesses in the fuselage.
    So we see a strong explosion ... even stronger than that of the Caliber, which has a warhead of 450 kg .. therefore, this is a Soviet-made Kh-22 Burya rocket ... which was in storage and is being spent in order to save effort and money. The missile has a warhead of 960 kg.



    1. +5
      29 June 2022 17: 19
      Fuck specific! We have a lot of them in warehouses, we use them with benefit.
      1. 0
        30 June 2022 19: 40
        More than 22 of these X-7000 missiles were fired.
  10. +7
    29 June 2022 17: 15
    one missile was shot down by Ukrainian air defense systems. The second missile reached its target, as a result of which the military unit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, located in the village of Avangard, Ovidiopol district, not far from Odessa, was hit. Depots with ammunition, fuel, military equipment and manpower of the enemy have been liquidated.

    Something too much has been destroyed, by one rocket. Maybe both of them reached their goal. And about the downed second missile, for the feeling of a small victory, the Ukrainian troops reported.
    1. R
      +1
      30 June 2022 02: 13
      Something too much has been destroyed, by one rocket.


      I wrote three times above, but I’m not too lazy to repeat myself)) :

      in our unit, fuel depots, a vehicle fleet and ammunition depots were very close, in the area of ​​​​the 2nd checkpoint. And the guards, respectively, constantly "hung out" there. Plus "fuel oil" (they are also "bolts", they are the same - "carriers"))) If we simulate the arrival of one-ton explosives in the center of an imaginary circle between these objects, then everyone would be "hooked" there - both equipment and warehouses with fuel , and ammunition, and personnel. Perhaps a unit with the same "standard" Soviet layout (architecture) as in my brigade flew to the kakelas.
  11. GNM
    +1
    29 June 2022 17: 16
    Our long-range airborne forces also always need to be in good shape, so far only front-line aviation is active on the BU, but there are more and more people who want to try our "Bogatyrskaya Silushka" (C) every day.
  12. +6
    29 June 2022 17: 34
    The only thing I regret is the fools who decided to earn extra money by glorifying fascism. There is no superiority of one nation over another. How many times has history proven this.
  13. 0
    29 June 2022 17: 36
    GOOD FELLOWS!!! keep it up!
  14. +11
    29 June 2022 17: 40
    Uncomfortable questions from the inhabitants of Kremenchug. Is the truth coming out?
  15. +1
    29 June 2022 18: 04
    How many lads flew to Bandera?
    1. +1
      29 June 2022 20: 16
      Quote: Metallurg_2
      How many lads flew to Bandera?

      The more we sell, the better bully
  16. +3
    29 June 2022 18: 51
    Very good news. In 1972, I did an internship near Ovidiopol at the S-200 complex. Probably still warm. Although it is difficult to say that they could bring down. It's time to clean up the Lvov, Ivano-Frankivsk, Chernihiv regions from Western military equipment and Nazis, however !!! am angry drinks
  17. +1
    29 June 2022 19: 45
    to all our military aircraft, well done, increase your combat experience, you are at the forefront of the attack, keep it up
  18. +1
    29 June 2022 19: 59
    This is how it should be done now. Less words - more shelling. smile
  19. +1
    29 June 2022 20: 38
    Another good hit. A good combination of Tu22 and X 22
  20. +2
    30 June 2022 01: 06
    Quote: Skipper
    X-32

    X-32 has a mass of explosives of about 500 kg compared to 960 X-22, due to this, the volume of fuel has been increased.
  21. +1
    30 June 2022 06: 22
    The Russian Aerospace Forces destroyed a military unit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Odessa with an accurate missile strike

    Well, the ground is being prepared for the liberation of the Black Sea coast.
  22. +3
    30 June 2022 06: 44
    Depots with ammunition, fuel, military equipment and manpower of the enemy have been liquidated.

    I understand correctly that they were hit by one missile:
    1. Ammunition depot
    2. Fuel warehouse
    3. Park (equipment storage)
    4. Barracks
    So?
    Good shot! Apparently Munchausen corrected on the core ...
    1. +1
      30 June 2022 06: 49
      Good shot! Apparently Munchausen corrected on the core ...

      This is the so-called multi-nuclear missile, it is still secret drinks
    2. 0
      30 June 2022 17: 02
      Yet:
      hairdresser's
      Bath
      Laundry
      Dining room
      Kapterka
      smoking room
      I also became interested in such incredible efficiency, they write that they dug out among the field https://t.me/xydessa/21335
  23. 0
    30 June 2022 07: 57
    And on the bridges in the outskirts is it possible? Is one enough for the bridge?
  24. +1
    30 June 2022 08: 32
    Interestingly, the author writes: "... the Tu-22M3 strategic long-range bomber."
    Here both distant and strategic ...
    It's just curious: did the author just forget in a rush or did he take information "from reliable sources"?
    In all normal publications - a long-range bomber-missile carrier ...
    1. 0
      30 June 2022 15: 18
      Quote: dmmyak40
      In all normal publications - a long-range bomber-missile carrier.

      It was strategic, but when the refueling was removed, it became distant
      1. 0
        1 July 2022 12: 32
        Can you share a link to a reliable source? I just haven't seen it anywhere in the manuals.
        There is such a book: "Long-Range Rocket Carrier-Bomber Tu-22M3" by A.M. Zatuchny, V.G. Rigmant, P.M. Sineokov).
        1. +1
          1 July 2022 13: 29
          Quote: dmmyak40
          Can you share a link to a reliable source?

          There is no reliable link, except perhaps this one

          https://avia.pro/blog/samolet-tu-22-m3-opisanie-harakteristiki-foto-video
          They write that he fell under the restrictions of SALT-2
          1. 0
            1 July 2022 14: 07
            I'll look for official documentation. As for the AVIPRO site, it has long turned into a garbage dump - an analogue of AIDS-Info.
  25. 0
    30 June 2022 09: 24
    pinpoint strikes do not win. rocket launches on TV - a beautiful agitation for housewives. when will the grinding of the enemy on the spot end? a strange special operation in white gloves under the slogan "no matter how worse it happened."
  26. 0
    30 June 2022 11: 58
    yesterday, loudly, once, it was, after dinner
  27. +1
    30 June 2022 12: 00
    By the way, the "epopee" with a useless rock called "serpentine" is over. I had enough brains, not immediately, to understand - its value = zero, but to balk at the task of propaganda and compete with Kyiv in this is nonsense
  28. mva
    0
    30 June 2022 15: 17
    Quote: dmi.pris
    According to the "statement" of one Bulgarian, we should have run out of all missiles today. Well, for the "zahisniks" of Odessa (rather finished losses).

    Let it be known to you that the X-22 was not in service with the BKC before the start of the special operation (they take it from the warehouses of the mobile reserve). It was made under Khrushchev, so perhaps the blogger is not so wrong.
    And extremely doubtful, in my opinion, is the destruction of the military unit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine by a missile with a CVO of 600 meters, originally made under a vigorous charge.
  29. 0
    30 June 2022 23: 35
    Is there an option for the X-22 land?
  30. The comment was deleted.
  31. AML
    +2
    1 July 2022 09: 45
    Quote: mva

    Let it be known to you X-22 before the start of the special operation, the VKC was not armed

    to be more precise, it was not.
    X-22 is the basic version for x32, which was put into service at 15-16.
  32. -1
    1 July 2022 09: 48
    The Russian Aerospace Forces destroyed a military unit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine near Odessa with an accurate missile strike

    Did they destroy the whole part with just one rocket? An entire regiment or brigade?
    Journalists love catchy headlines, otherwise who would read their articles.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"