Technical potential and features of the use of TOS-1A in the Special Operation

60

TOS-1A in a camouflaged parking lot

In March, units of the troops of radiation, chemical and biological protection, equipped with heavy flamethrower systems TOS-1A Solntsepek, were involved in the Special Operation. They are tasked with delivering strikes against area targets and enemy clusters. The results of such combat use are regularly demonstrated, confirming the high efficiency of flamethrower systems, auxiliary means and methods of their work.

Recent Posts


On June 24, the Ministry of Defense published interesting new information about the combat work of flamethrowers. Features of the use of TOS-1A are revealed on the example of a unit from the Western Military District involved in the "Z" grouping. The main task of the unit and calculations at the moment is the destruction of fortified strongholds and positions of the enemy.



The Ministry of Defense reports that the Suns are working together with reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles. The latter are entrusted with the tasks of controlling and adjusting fire. Having executed the strike, the crew of the combat vehicle leaves the firing position in the minimum time and retreats to reload. After that, new launches are possible.


Exit to firing position

Videos are attached to the post. The first shows how the TOS-1A moves into position and prepares to fire. Rocket launches and the destruction of various enemy targets are also demonstrated. In another video, the deputy commander of the Solntsepekov platoon reveals some details of combat work. He noted that the machines have to work at a small distance from the enemy, from 500 m. In this regard, mobility and the ability to leave a position are of great importance. The crews have the necessary experience, and it takes about a minute to withdraw.

At the same time, great risks remain. So, in another video, the head of the calculation shows the damage to his combat vehicle. In the course of use, it came under fire, as evidenced by chips and holes from bullets and shrapnel. A hole from a rocket-propelled anti-tank grenade remained on the guide package. Nevertheless, the armored car continues to serve and performs new attacks on the enemy.

Thus, the TOS-1A flamethrower systems continue their combat work in different areas and successfully destroy the intended targets. In doing so, they reach their full potential. Anti-missile armor drastically reduces the risks for vehicles and crews, special rockets hit their intended targets, and modern reconnaissance and target designation tools increase overall combat effectiveness.


Technical capabilities


Recall that the TOS-1A Solntsepek heavy flamethrower system is actually a special version of a multiple launch rocket system for a specific ammunition. The complex includes a combat vehicle on a tank chassis, a unified transport-loading vehicle, as well as several types of missiles.

TOS-1A facilities are built on the chassis of the main tank T-72, which has undergone minimal changes. The previous power plant and chassis have been retained, which gives high mobility on off-road and rough terrain. Also remained the same armored body with a combined anti-projectile protection of the frontal projection. A rudimentary turret with a swinging artillery unit is installed on the hull. The guide package is made in an armored box that protects shells from bullets and shrapnel.

To ensure high firing accuracy, the Solntsepek is equipped with a full-fledged fire control system. It includes an optical sight, a laser rangefinder, a ballistic computer, a set of various sensors and other devices. In addition, there are modern navigation and communication tools that simplify the preparation for firing and receiving target designation. Calculation of data for shooting is carried out automatically; aiming is carried out by remotely controlled mechanisms.


The basic one weapons TOS-1A are unguided rockets of the MO.1.01.04 family. These are products in 220 mm caliber, 3,3-3,8 m long, weighing up to 217 kg, with an incendiary or volumetric detonating warhead. Missiles are characterized by a large mass, which affects their flight data. Products of the first modifications flew only 3 km. In the next generation of projectiles, a range of 6 km was obtained. It was reported about the creation of new ammunition, which will again show an increased range.

Regardless of the firing range, all compatible projectiles have a common range of tasks. They are intended for the destruction of manpower, unprotected and lightly armored vehicles in open spaces or in various structures. At the same time, volume-detonating warheads show the greatest efficiency. One volley with a full load of 24 rounds allows you to cover an area of ​​40 thousand square meters.

In order to increase the efficiency of combat work, TOS-1A are included in the existing reconnaissance and strike contours. The tasks of reconnaissance, target detection and determination of their coordinates in such a system are assigned to unmanned aviation complexes such as Orlan-10. Command posts and military communication systems of the tactical level are also involved. All these means ensure the detection of targets and the timely transmission of target designation to a fire weapon in the form of a "Sun".


Shooting results

Realizing the potential


The TOS-1A has a high combat potential, and it is easy to see how various features of this machine are used in real operations. At the same time, it is possible to neutralize the risks associated with objective limitations. The result of this is high efficiency in solving real combat missions.

The use of "Suns" in the current Special Operation once again shows the importance and necessity of creating reconnaissance and strike circuits with maximum speed. Without UAVs and appropriate communication channels, finding targets and adjusting fire would be much more difficult and would take more time. In addition, the reconnaissance drone is able to detect a threat to the flamethrower system in a timely manner, which reduces possible risks.

TOS-1A is built on a tank chassis, and practice confirms the correctness of this decision. Even with new extended-range projectiles, the combat vehicle is forced to work at the forefront, where it can come under fire. Recent materials from the Ministry of Defense show that tank armor can cope with such threats. Moreover, even getting into the guide package may not have negative consequences.


Damage from enemy fire

Missiles of the MO.1.01.04 series have long demonstrated the high power of volumetric detonating warheads. Now they are reaffirming their potential. A special charge successfully hits various targets, up to armored vehicles, both in open space and in shelters. In addition, rockets were used with high efficiency against enemy fortifications at industrial facilities.

Specialized tool


In general, the Solntsepek proves to be an effective and convenient means for solving fire missions. TOS-1A is able to quickly arrive at a given position, find and hit targets, and special ammunition does not leave the last chance. However, in terms of a number of characteristics and capabilities, the flamethrower system is inferior to the "traditional" MLRS. It has a shorter range, which forces it to work in the return fire zone, and also has a limited choice of ammunition.

"Sun" is actually a specialized system for a narrow range of tasks. However, it has no competitors in its field. No other rocket artillery system has a similar or close combination of fire capabilities and protection.

Therefore, TOS-1A will remain in operation, and specific combat missions will remain behind them. Other work will be assigned to conventional MLRS and distributed based on their capabilities and characteristics. At the same time, the simultaneous operation of flamethrower systems and multiple launch rocket systems has obvious theoretical and practical advantages. And now all this contributes to the speedy achievement of all the goals of the Special Operation.
60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -21
    29 June 2022 05: 10
    He noted that the machines have to work at a small distance from the enemy, from 500 m.
    Products of the first modifications flew only 3 km. In the next generation of shells a range of 6 km was obtained.
    fool Have you tried a pistol shot?
    1. +7
      29 June 2022 06: 21
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Have you tried a pistol shot?

      Open 2 GIS of your city and see what is 3 km, 6 km and estimated 10-12 km.
    2. +6
      29 June 2022 12: 41
      Rocket TOS-1 - firing range-8 km., Therefore, the basic armor protection of the T-72 was preserved
  2. +5
    29 June 2022 05: 49
    It sounds strange - "rudimentary tower", maybe it's still low-profile?
    1. +7
      29 June 2022 19: 22
      Actually, not even a tower, but a shoulder strap with a package of guides.
      1. -3
        30 June 2022 03: 00
        Quote: Andrey Moskvin
        and shoulder strap with a package of guides.

        Pursuit of what, a tower or a "package"? What shoulder strap, top or bottom? The fact that the tower does not have a cannon does not make it rudimentary.
        1. +5
          30 June 2022 03: 45
          I meant that only the epaulette was left from the tower, there was a package on it. hi the rudiment of the tower and called the "rudiment".
  3. +11
    29 June 2022 06: 05
    A terrible weapon, burn more evil spirits with them.
  4. +12
    29 June 2022 06: 39
    OS-1A is built on a tank chassis, and practice confirms the correctness of this decision. Even with the new extended-range projectiles, the combat vehicle is forced to work at the forefront, where it can come under fire.

    Where there is danger, you can use thermobaric shells 9M51 MLRS "Hurricane", the effect is the same.
  5. +6
    29 June 2022 06: 57
    As far as I know, in today's tosas, NURSs hit 10 km already. A TOS-2 at 18 km
    1. +4
      29 June 2022 09: 26
      Quote: Skipper
      today's tosah NURSs beat for 10 km

      The main thing here is to get out from under a possible strike by mortars and anti-tank systems, other means of destruction are clearly visible and cannot be deployed quickly
      1. +4
        29 June 2022 10: 45
        It is easy to get out from under the blow - the time of a full salvo according to the performance characteristics is 6 seconds. That is, the entire package of 24 NURS takes off in 6 seconds. Then a minute or two and leaving the position. And during this time + NURS flight time + time for aiming enemy artillery and aiming ... the enemy will never be able to catch the system in its previous position. There are no weaklings.
  6. +6
    29 June 2022 07: 22
    What a beautiful weapon in Russia!
  7. +3
    29 June 2022 08: 40
    , I saw a video of how they beat with thermal charges.
  8. +2
    29 June 2022 09: 21
    They get it even in the trenches, as I understand it.
    1. +3
      29 June 2022 12: 07
      Quote: Okak Okakiev
      They get it even in the trenches, as I understand it.
      Thermobaric munitions "get" everywhere where the explosive mixture flows: in dugouts, shelters, even in equipment, if the FVU is not turned on.
      So, this is a "terrible" weapon for enemies ... "shaitan-pipe" is called!
      1. +1
        29 June 2022 19: 31
        It is without wicking, because the wave goes around obstacles.

        And the wave at the thermal bar, like that of ordinary ammunition, is 3-4 times greater in weight
      2. +5
        29 June 2022 19: 48
        What's with the mix flow? It kills pressure, stupidly, even at a distance from the place of impact, the lungs collapse or the body refuses due to concussion.
        1. 0
          1 August 2022 16: 09
          Quote: anykind
          What's with the mix flow? Kills the pressure


          yes, that's right - in water there is a similar phenomenon known to many - cavitation
      3. 0
        8 August 2022 10: 11
        It's not the mixture that leaks. The wave is flowing.
    2. -22
      29 June 2022 18: 43
      There is almost no one in the trenches anymore. There is no cover for Artoy, it makes no sense to sit under enemy fire. So these suns are baked from the side, rustling where everything is already knocked out ... in short, for the beautiful briefings of the Moscow Region and the friendly smile on Konashenkov's face at the next report.
      1. +5
        29 June 2022 19: 41
        So I saw enough smoked corpses in the telegram
        1. -16
          29 June 2022 20: 48
          So when our columns were gouged in March, I also saw a lot of smoked corpses in the cart. It is possible, by the same principle, to draw the same conclusion.
          For whom he wrote the word almost above, it is not clear
  9. exo
    +4
    29 June 2022 11: 51
    If the tracked chassis is so good, why did they create a wheeled version? And how does the wheeled version manifest itself during the operation? Maybe the author will be able to clarify the situation.
    1. +3
      30 June 2022 11: 36
      Quote: exo
      If the tracked chassis is so good, why did they create a wheeled version?

      Because the tracked chassis is heavy, expensive to operate, and most importantly, it works in the affected area of ​​most enemy anti-tank weapons. Therefore, the RHBZ ordered an extended-range wheeled TOS.
      And as a result, our Armed Forces again found themselves in a situation where the types and types of troops duplicate each other. On the one hand, it is dangerous to release TOS-2 to the front line, so it must work with PDO. And this requires the creation of full-fledged artillery units in the RKhBZ, which provide the generation of data for firing, adjustment, etc. On the other hand, all this is already in the already existing reads on the Hurricanes. And there is even a thermobaric RS for him - 9M51. And the caliber of the "Hurricane" is the same - 220 mm.
      That is, all TOS-2 tasks can be performed by the Uragan already available to the gunners with RS from TOS-2. But there is nothing to replace the TOS-1 - artillerymen and tankers do not have an analogue of a self-propelled assault flamethrower.
  10. -2
    29 June 2022 13: 56
    Thermobaric rocket 9m51 MLRS Hurricane range 13km. Anything is better than the TOS range and what is the point in it? Nowhere to put the money?
    1. +4
      29 June 2022 14: 36
      Quote: landromat
      better than the range of TOS and what is the point in it? Nowhere to put the money?

      The Hurricane is lightly armored and does not have the ability to get close to the front line. As a result, his hit accuracy is proportional to the firing range, plus additional costs for a more powerful solid-propellant engine (Solnepek has more powerful warheads).
      If this is not taken into account, then all MLRS can be replaced with Tornado-S and then generally further optimized to Sarmat.
      1. -5
        29 June 2022 15: 58

        Sense of that armor. They have the same BC.
    2. +3
      30 June 2022 11: 42
      Quote: landromat
      Thermobaric rocket 9m51 MLRS Hurricane range 13km. Anything is better than the TOS range and what is the point in it?

      TOS-1 is an assault flamethrower operating at the forefront. Its task is to accurately burn out strong points.
      But the new TOS-2 really makes no sense. It’s scary to let out on the front wheeled lightly armored vehicle. And all its other tasks are performed by the usual "Hurricane".
      1. 0
        30 June 2022 14: 28
        For himars and other brimstones with escaliburs, the goal is simply very tasty, the success of the special operation is obvious. It is necessary to fasten the satellite correction to the Hurricane thermal bar and raise the range, although it is already too late.
        1. +1
          30 June 2022 19: 31
          It is possible at the initial stage to reduce the number of missiles in the launcher ... by increasing the range in an extensive way ... and then, of course, you can, like the "American partners", make a controlled
        2. 0
          7 July 2022 11: 34
          I'm not special ... Can't you attach a kind of warhead to a caliber? 500 kg thermobar with precise guidance and delivery for 2000 miles.
          For individual purposes, it is possible with a doublet: the first landmine for punching "holes" the second terbobar for bringing destruction to supercritical.
  11. -2
    29 June 2022 18: 03
    We need a corr rocket for Glonas ... this will reduce the consumption of ammunition at times
    1. +1
      29 June 2022 19: 46
      Nevertheless, the device works at short ranges, most likely it will be superfluous.
      1. -1
        29 June 2022 21: 52
        In what? There is a trench….. we set the coordinates along it with a step of 50m……the car drove out and struck. And now, even. With topographic location, 50% more missile consumption
        1. +1
          29 June 2022 22: 07
          And why leave then, there is an ordinary "Grad", which does not need to drive up so close, and which is in no way inferior in terms of fire capabilities? Is there any idea about the existence of such a machine?
          1. 0
            1 July 2022 18: 40
            Then, that the action of the OF warheads and the CSTO warheads is different, the aerosol flows into all the cracks and undermines, but gives less fragmentation of the years and of the action. But in the trenches and dugouts it works perfectly
            1. +1
              1 July 2022 18: 57
              Take an interest in the "Grad" ammunition load, there is also a thermobaric one.
              1. 0
                1 July 2022 19: 10
                And you take an interest in the weight of hail warheads, hurricane and tornado and TOS .... With similar equipment
  12. -3
    29 June 2022 18: 16
    It is absolutely incomprehensible that only one thing is why these cool things are not used in a divisional way?
    1. 0
      29 June 2022 18: 47
      Seriously? Isn't it clear? Given that you have been sitting on this God-saved site for 6 years? Look at the distance. And look at the range of enemy artillery ... and add 2 + 2. And answer your own question
      1. Where do these wooden ones need to go to cover enemy clusters
      2. Does it make sense to burn a clean, unoccupied field?
      1. +4
        29 June 2022 21: 55
        This is a niche assault weapon…. Extremely unsafe to use. Any Art battery will shoot it in accuracy and range. Even a 120mm mortar is dangerous. This is an assault weapon when the artillery is suppressed and all around
      2. 0
        30 June 2022 19: 33
        I totally agree .. range and guidance need to be improved
    2. 0
      1 July 2022 18: 40
      Ukrainian artillery does not sleep, like drones.
  13. +5
    29 June 2022 19: 17
    Use the stacking of UDSH sabers, as in Chechnya, during the storming of Grozny .. "So, in early 2000, in the battles for the cannery, a method of setting up an aerosol cover was successfully tested using TDA tanks and UDSH hung on it. A tank with a working TDA and equipped two working checkers UDSH (suspended on the stern) moved along the frontal street.The resulting aerosol curtain completely concealed the advancement of motorized rifle units to a new line not only from aimed horizontal fire, but also from defeat from high-rise buildings.In the future, this method was often used by combined arms units.Successfully the issue of aerosol cover in flamethrower units was mastered and worked out, especially in units of heavy flamethrower systems TOS-1.The crews of the advanced fire support platoon vehicles equipped with a container with slabs of UDSH, after the report of the commander of the combat vehicle on aiming, launched 2-3 slabs of UDSH. and withdrawal from combat positions were already taking place in conditional viah not visible from the enemy aerosol screen. After completing the combat mission, both combat vehicles left firing positions under cover of smoke. Later, reconnaissance data established that more than 100 people were killed as a result of a fire strike by TOS installations. and up to 200 people. were injured. The enemy was so demoralized that during the subsequent offensive of motorized rifle and special units, there was no fire resistance from the enemy, and the survivors surrendered. The actions of the company were highly appreciated by the commander of the Western Group of Forces, Lieutenant General V.A. SHAMANOV.". Collection for the 100th anniversary of the troops of the RKhBZ 1918-2018.
  14. -8
    29 June 2022 19: 20
    Quote: prorab_ak
    Seriously? Isn't it clear? Given that you have been sitting on this God-saved site for 6 years? Look at the distance. And look at the range of enemy artillery ... and add 2 + 2. And answer your own question
    1. Where do these wooden ones need to go to cover enemy clusters
    2. Does it make sense to burn a clean, unoccupied field?

    A division salvo will completely destroy any company stronghold. To prevent the enemy from sticking his head out at this moment, artillery preparation is being carried out on him.
    Actually, such actions are called the concentration of force of means and they are taught to plan in any combined arms school.
    Since the infantry that knows how to conduct a firefight in Russia turned out to be very small, and the most motivated and combat-ready ones have dropped out now, it remains to rely only on superiority in the number of artillery and such suns.
    1. 0
      30 June 2022 19: 35
      You have a strange reasoning, you’ll prepare a special operation for a salvo of sleepers ... it’s easier to increase the range and guidance (we don’t have much command and consistency), but the main thing is a critically short range
  15. +1
    29 June 2022 19: 50
    A limited set of ammunition can be supplemented, for example, with cluster ones. It will be possible during the assault on cities to shower the enemy with cluster munitions with fragmentation submunitions.
    1. +1
      30 June 2022 11: 16
      Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
      A limited set of ammunition can be supplemented, for example, with cluster ones. It will be possible during the assault on cities to shower the enemy with cluster munitions with fragmentation submunitions.

      Artillerymen have all this - in full-time divisional, corps and army artillery.
      Why produce parallel artillery of the RKhBZ troops?
  16. +2
    29 June 2022 19: 59
    good thing, but the range of the missiles is too short. Big risk for the crew. Yes, and GOS and control would not hurt to have. Shooting in areas, as we now see on the dombas, is ineffective.
  17. +1
    30 June 2022 17: 59
    Such a machine constantly needs the protection of infantry or motorized riflemen, otherwise it is very vulnerable to the enemy, even if after shooting the entire ammo it can break away in 1 minute.
    1. 0
      30 June 2022 19: 33
      The question of joint actions of BMPTs and TOSs has long been raised. The first is fire escort and cover for TOSs up to the use of UDSH stacks, not counting the rest of the weapons. This was immediately shown by the exercises conducted in Uzbekistan, seven years ago. At that time, we limited ourselves to this practical experience with wise reasoning. Now the guys are raking for it.
  18. 0
    30 June 2022 19: 39
    I see a quick solution to increase the range by reducing the number of shots and increasing the mass of the rocket (precisely due to the increase in the delivery charge) and think about increasing the accuracy ... while this is a crude but necessary machine
  19. 0
    3 July 2022 13: 05
    I wonder if there are statistics of losses? At least as a percentage
  20. 0
    8 July 2022 11: 48
    Why don't they show the results of the shelling? No need to say that there is entirely meat, these are just words.
  21. 0
    20 August 2022 13: 05
    apparently in the Russian Armed Forces this is already some kind of ineradicable dogma - to beat on the squares with echelons of ammunition ... maybe something will hit ..
  22. -1
    27 August 2022 23: 12
    Have they been withdrawn from the RKhBZ? ))
  23. 0
    29 August 2022 16: 18
    It is necessary to develop ammunition for a firing range of up to 20 km .... soldier
  24. -1
    21 September 2022 15: 53
    Great technique! The main thing is to apply it correctly. For example, the same fortified areas like Avdiivka were simply created for the ODB. Only, there is clearly not enough "Solntsepekov" (not to mention "Tosochka"). In general, our military-industrial complex has something to work on - the West is clearly ready to fight "to the last Ukrainian."
  25. -1
    25 September 2022 14: 34
    Why this ad? There is destruction of strongholds, but there is no attack and advance and full. AND?