Theory and practice of a swept wing

42
Theory and practice of a swept wing

Glider TsAGI-2 or BP-2 in flight. You can see the shape of the wing. Photo Airwar.ru

Since the mid-thirties of the XX century. scientists and designers from different countries are studying the theme of the reverse swept wing. Studies have shown that such an aircraft architecture has a number of important advantages over traditional schemes and is of particular practical interest. However, it was not widely used and could not supplant other designs. In addition, such a technical solution has shown itself well only in certain areas.

Direct or negative


Since the middle of the last century, most aircraft of all major classes have been equipped with a forward-swept wing. Such a scheme makes it possible to reduce the frontal and wave resistance, as well as to reduce the aerodynamic loads on the structure. All this contributes to an increase in flight speed, improves maneuverability and other parameters.



However, the swept wing has disadvantages due to the fact that part of the air flow moves along the plane. So, in certain flight modes, depending on the achieved angle of attack, the so-called. end effect. The flow moving along the plane begins to break away from the tip and creates vortices that reduce the overall lift, impair stability and interfere with the operation of the ailerons, which spoils the controllability.

In the thirties, Soviet and foreign scientists and designers proposed an original way to solve the problems of a swept wing - a reverse swept wing (KOS). It was proposed to change the location of the leading edge so that the tips were in the flow ahead of the root of the wing.


An experienced DB-LK bomber designed by Belyaev. Photo Airwar.ru

On such a wing, the longitudinal component of the flow moves not to the tip, but to the center section, after which it leaves along the fuselage. Due to this, the end effect occurs only at high angles of attack, and it does not interfere with the operation of the ailerons. An increase in swept back and the correct selection of wing geometry can enhance these effects. All this leads to an improvement in maneuverability and provides new opportunities for a constructive nature.

However, KOS is not without serious shortcomings. The specifics of the flow around leads to special loads and there is a so-called. elastic positive divergence. The flow with great force twists the plane around its longitudinal axis, due to which there is a risk of damage or destruction of the structure. There are special requirements for the materials and construction technologies used.

Early experiments


The first aircraft with KOS is considered to be the Soviet glider BP-2 or TsAGI-2 designed by V.P. Belyaev, built in 1934. This device showed good aerodynamic characteristics and generally confirmed the fundamental possibility of creating and using SOS. Later, Belyaev built and tested new experimental gliders.

A few years later, a DB-LK bomber was built according to his project. The twin-fuselage twin-engine machine had signs of a "flying wing" and tapering in terms of the reverse sweep plane. On trials in 1939-40. the aircraft showed good flight characteristics, but was characterized by reduced stability.


German Ju-287 aircraft under construction. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

In the thirties, the theme of KOS was also taken up abroad. For example, several experienced gliders were built and tested in Poland, but the Second World War prevented the further development of the direction. Already during the war, Germany began to develop this topic. In February 1944, German aircraft manufacturers took to the air an experimental Ju-287 aircraft with a sweep of -23 ° along the leading edge. The estimated speed of such a machine exceeded 800 km / h, but the twisting of the wing forced the tests to be stopped before it was reached.

After the war, this project was developed. German specialists in the Soviet OKB-1 developed an experimental aircraft EF-131 of a similar design. Taking into account the experience of previous tests, it was decided to reduce the sweep. However, the load problem has not disappeared. The project was considered unsuccessful and closed.

First successes


However, in early stories KOS had some successes. So, back in 1936, the Lysander multi-purpose aircraft, developed by the British company Westland, made its first flight. It was a high-wing strut with a broken wing leading edge. The root part of the planes had a noticeable negative sweep, the consoles had a smaller one. The machine was driven by two pilots, she carried machine guns and small-caliber bombs.

"Lysander" showed high flight performance and entered service with the KVVS. The production of such machines started in 1938 and continued until 1942. Nearly 1700 aircraft were built. As a result, Lysander became the first mass-produced and most massive KOS aircraft in history.


Civilian HFB-320 in the museum. Photo by Wikimedia Commons

In the late forties, the theme of KOS was developed in the USSR, and in 1950 an experimental short-haul aircraft Il-14 took off. Its characteristic feature was a wing with a sweep of -3 ° along the leading edge; on the center section were the engine nacelles. This technical solution improved aerodynamics and increased performance in all major modes.

IL-14 turned out to be a successful machine, went into a large series and was massively operated on different lines. For our own needs and for export, our country has built almost 1350 such aircraft.

In 1966, the HFB-320 Hansa Jet multi-purpose aircraft from the German company Hamburger Flugzeugbau entered service. The machine with a maximum takeoff weight of more than 9,2 tons received a tapering wing with a sweep of -15 °, advanced mechanization and fuel tanks at the tips. The aircraft developed a speed of 825 km / h and showed high takeoff and landing characteristics. The crew consisted of two pilots; the passenger cabin accommodated up to 12-15 people.

Sufficiently high performance interested several customers, and the HFB-320 went into series. 47 cars were built. At first, the aircraft was used only on passenger lines, but then the Bundeswehr became interested in it. On a successful platform, a jamming aircraft was completed.

It should be noted that since the 13s and 700s, the CBS theme has gained popularity among foreign manufacturers of sports gliders. For several decades, a number of such projects have been developed, and some have reached a large series. So, the most massive in its class was the West German glider of the mid-sixties Schleicher ASK XNUMX, built by a series of approx. XNUMX units


Experimental aircraft Grumman X-29. Photo by NASA

Military experiences


After the success of the civil aircraft industry, research was resumed on the topic of SOS for combat aviation. The first project of the "new generation" was created by the American company Grumman in cooperation with the DARPA agency. The purpose of the program with the index X-29 was to develop the design of an aircraft of an unusual design, built using modern technologies and components.

The X-29 was built with extensive use of composite materials to meet design loads. The glider received a front horizontal tail and a wing with a sweep of -30 °. Another innovation was tested in the field of on-board equipment. The aircraft was equipped with a fly-by-wire control system with three control computers. All this made it possible to make the machine statically unstable and to fully test the maneuvering potential of the KOS.

Flight tests of the X-29 began in 1984, two prototypes were used. In general, the design characteristics and capabilities were confirmed. In addition, composites and computerized EDSU showed their best performance. However, the X-29 project was considered unsuccessful. He not only demonstrated all the advantages of an unusual wing, but also revealed a number of its shortcomings. Further development was considered meaningless.

Since the beginning of the eighties, a similar project has been created in the USSR / Russia. The Sukhoi Design Bureau developed and brought to testing an experimental S-37 or Su-47 aircraft, also known as the Berkut. The first flight of this machine took place in 1997, and the next few years were spent on experiments.


Russian Su-47 Berkut. Photo Airwar.ru

The aircraft was made according to the "integral longitudinal triplane" scheme with front horizontal tail and tail stabilizers. The wing had a composite structure and a trapezoidal shape. The influx of the wing had a positive sweep of 75 °, then the transitional part followed, and the leading edge of the console had a sweep of -20 °. A computerized EDSU with multiple redundancy and a spare hydraulic system was used.

According to known data, S-37 confirmed all preliminary estimates. He showed the high potential and capabilities of the KOS and new control systems, however, he pointed out the presence of characteristic aerodynamic difficulties. In this regard, at the beginning of the 47s, work on KOS was curtailed. At the same time, the built Su-XNUMX remained in service - it was used as a flying laboratory for the promising PAK DA program.

As an interesting example of the military use of KOS, one should recall the American AGM-129 ACM air-launched cruise missile, which was in service in 1990-2012. It was built in a characteristically shaped hull and had a folding forward-swept wing.

It is curious that in this case the KOS was not used to improve aerodynamics and flight data, but as an element of stealth technology. When illuminated from the front or from below, the straight or swept leading edge reflects the radar signal forward or to the side, which increases the RCS of the aircraft. KOS, in turn, reflects the signal to the fuselage, which does not allow him to return to the radar.


Cruise missile AGM-129 ACM in flight configuration. US Air Force photo

For individual destinations


Thus, in the course of numerous studies and tests of real aircraft, the reverse-swept wing confirmed all its calculated capabilities and advantages. In addition, it showed that there are some limitations and problems that need to be taken into account when developing new projects.

It should be noted that only individual samples of aircraft with KOS reached mass production, and all of them belong to several classes. These are gliders or light aircraft, as well as civilian liners. Despite all the efforts of the designers, supersonic supermaneuverable fighters with KOS have not yet progressed beyond testing.

The reasons for this are quite simple. Gliders or passenger aircraft make it possible to realize the main advantages of SOS and improve flight performance without overcomplicating the design. The creation of a maneuverable fighter, in turn, requires new materials and technologies that will allow it to withstand all the specific loads. As practice has shown, even computers and composites do not allow solving all such problems and guaranteeing safe operation and combat use.

It is likely that in the future the direction of KOS will continue to develop. Experiments will be carried out in different countries, and new models of equipment will be created. However, one should not expect rapid progress in this area. In addition, most likely, the application of this scheme will be limited to light and passenger aviation, incl. non-motorized. Combat aviation, in turn, will continue to use proven and proven concepts.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    29 September 2022 16: 15
    If KOS gives tangible advantages at low speeds (which is proved by the example of the Il-14), why not use it on small aircraft like Baikal?
    1. +2
      29 September 2022 16: 23
      Growing loads, requirements for materials.
      Maybe easier biplane?
    2. +4
      29 September 2022 16: 32
      If KOS gives tangible advantages at low speeds (which is proved by the example of IL-14)
      Why did you call this trapezoidal wing on the IL-14 KOS? Then after all, the wing of the DC-3 (Li-2) can be called swept.
    3. 0
      29 September 2022 16: 55
      Because at low speeds, a straight wing is more optimal. By the way, the IL-14 had a straight trapezoidal wing.
    4. +1
      29 September 2022 17: 19
      Quote: Arkady007
      If KOS gives tangible advantages at low speeds (which is proved by the example of IL-14)

      Sweep -3 degrees from a straight wing is practically the same, but a straight wing is more technologically advanced, which means cheaper.
      The Laysander had only the center section swept back and solely to improve the pilot's visibility.
      And Hansa received a reverse sweep for maximum cabin volume, in her case the main spar passed behind the passenger / cargo cabin. And she had good vp-characteristics due to powerful mechanization.
      In general, at low speeds, the return flow is used for layout advantages, and at high speeds it is still of little use for strength reasons.
      1. +7
        29 September 2022 21: 54
        They forgot to mention the SR-10 aircraft (from the Design Bureau "Modern Aviation Technologies"):
        1. +1
          30 September 2022 03: 55
          Quote: Bad_gr
          They forgot to mention the SR-10 aircraft (from the Design Bureau "Modern Aviation Technologies"):

          Well, I briefly analyzed the models described by the author with a controversial return flow efficiency. And the SR-10 is a very light machine with an integrated circuit, which means the wing is short and stiffness is relatively easy to provide, I think so.
        2. 0
          1 October 2022 14: 54
          Kirill Ryabov (author of the article) is known for his compilations on newsworthy events. There was a signal - other "golden eagles" noted - an article of the Kyrgyz Republic appeared.
          like any "copywriter" he should not / wants to be an analyst, but only "not to make obvious mistakes." Because money pays for maintaining the theme, not expanding. It is pointless to look for _independent_ meaning in his articles.
      2. 0
        29 September 2022 23: 54
        1. If -3 gr on the IL-14 did not crush them, they would not have done and praised the flight characteristics of the aircraft. Why just complicate technology like that.
        2. I can’t imagine the scheme of reverse sweep only of the center section. Can you draw it?
        3. I asked a question about the use of KOS at low speeds, no more and did not read a single argument against it.
        1. 0
          30 September 2022 04: 06
          Quote: Arkady007
          1. If -3 gr on the IL-14 did not crush them, they would not have done and praised the flight characteristics of the aircraft. Why just complicate technology like that.

          They are praised for the combination of properties (improved profile, mechanization and aerodynamics in general), but the author, out of some kind of fright, attributed all this to the return line, which, by the way, is not specifically mentioned.
          Quote: Arkady007
          2. I can’t imagine the scheme of reverse sweep only of the center section. Can you draw it?
          Is it so difficult to fill in the name of the aircraft in the search?
          http://www.airwar.ru/enc/other2/lysander.html

          Quote: Arkady007
          I asked a question about the use of KOS at low speeds, no more and did not read a single argument against it.
          Already a high cost is an argument.
          And once again, a small sweep does not give any special advantages over a straight wing, and a long road is difficult to manufacture.
          1. 0
            30 September 2022 08: 57
            1. If you think that 3 g for a wing profile is not of great importance, I think this is a delusion. Because any wing has an installation angle that changes along the length of the profile, even on a straight wing. Therefore, -3 gr and + 3 gr is a big difference.
            2. For the first time I come across a wording when the teardrop shape of the fuselage is called reverse sweep.
            3. If on the IL-14, in those years, they could build a reverse-swept wing, I don’t understand why it has become very difficult and expensive now.
            1. 0
              30 September 2022 18: 34
              Quote: Arkady007
              If you think that 3 grams for a wing profile does not matter much, I think this is a delusion. Because any wing has an installation angle that changes along the length of the profile, even on a straight wing. Therefore, -3 gr and + 3 gr is a big difference.

              Some kind of nonsense - to confuse the wing profile with the installation angle. But in terms of sweep, on the IL-14 they fenced a garden with a return line for the sake of the normal operation of the ailerons at high angles of attack, so that the stall did not fall on them.
              Already on the IL-18 they abandoned this. And in general, why is the wing of the IL-18 with a sweep angle along the leading edge noticeably greater than 3 degrees not called swept?

              Quote: Arkady007
              2. For the first time I come across a wording when the teardrop shape of the fuselage is called reverse sweep.
              ???? I haven't seen this at all. Not in your comments for sure.

              Quote: Arkady007
              3. If on the IL-14, in those years, they could build a reverse-swept wing, I don’t understand why it has become very difficult and expensive now.
              By the way, about the high cost at small angles (but only at small ones!) I won’t argue, but the efficiency is minimal, an example of this is the IL-14. But it seems that the wing, even with such a meager angle, still wears out faster than a straight one, because it also twists, in addition to the usual load.
    5. Eug
      0
      30 September 2022 06: 12
      Very expensive. And the advantages of KOS on Baikal are not needed - why does he need maneuverability at low speeds? As I understand it, KOS was considered mainly for the deck version, where the minimum evolutionary speed is the most important parameter.
      1. 0
        30 September 2022 09: 00
        It is Baikal that should replace the An-2, which has advantages over other aircraft in the minimum runway requirements. Runway approaches and length. When you need maneuverability at low speeds and a minimum run of 80-150 m.
        1. Eug
          0
          30 September 2022 11: 39
          As for me, you are confusing the installation angle of attack of the wing (which changes along the length of the plane - this is one of the types of aerodynamic twist) with the sweep angle. And for Baikal, in order to reduce the length of the runway, the lift at low speeds and the low "cost" of achieving it are much more important - Storkh, Yak-12 have learned to provide controllability for straight-wing aircraft for a long time.
          1. 0
            30 September 2022 14: 58
            1. A person says that 3 g is an insignificant amount, I have big doubts about this. And it doesn't matter where these 3 gr. In sweep or in installation.
            2. Reverse sweep increases lift precisely at low speeds (written in the manuals). If it already has an installation room, why bother mechanization?
    6. 0
      1 October 2022 13: 28
      (which is proved by the example of IL-14),

      Nothing has been proven there.
      And the influx at the root gave the same stall effect, first at the root, and then at the ailerons.
      The very same negative turn of the console could well be due to the centering requirement. Like, for example, a direct arrow on the Il-2 KSS or Me-262, or even a reverse arrow on the Antonovsky glider.
      But in fact, the sweep was not needed, if not for the wave transonic effect. So it appeared - direct and reverse. And not less than 35 degrees - otherwise it makes no sense. It turned out to be unprofitable to bother with the reverse price of a rigid and heavy wing. Therefore, they simply did a twist with a straight sweep. And then the root influx for large angles of attack.
      1. 0
        1 October 2022 14: 00
        Let me disagree with your arguments.
        1. Fairings in the root part of the wing (not sags) are made in order to reduce turbulence and the possibility of stalling.
        2. As a result of practical studies, it was proved that fairings have practically no effect on the lift coefficient, the longitudinal static moment, and the drag coefficient decreases, as a result, the aerodynamic quality of the aircraft increases. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-zalizov-v-sopryazhenii-kryla-s-fyuzelyazhem-pri-dozvukovyh-skorostyah/viewer
        1. 0
          1 October 2022 17: 22
          Fairings in the root of the wing

          Classic fairing on low-wings is needed in the rear of the profile. And then the influx and fairing.
          That's just fairing and influx + fairing.

        2. 0
          1 October 2022 19: 12
          Let me disagree with your arguments.

          And you know, I read it - in fact, reverse sweep was introduced intentionally. That's just an amazing reason - by all means maintain lateral (roll) controllability during takeoff on one engine. For the sake of this, they went for an unprecedented thing - almost neutral roll stability with huge directional stability. In principle, such machines are prone to lateral helical instability. But on the other hand, he flew on one motor without much effort on the pedals, and did a turn without slipping with the pedals thrown (RN) hi
  2. -2
    29 September 2022 16: 18
    I heard that the Su-47 was "wrapped" because of the wing - in case of damage, it is necessary to change it entirely, and not "patched". And it turned out to be a good plane.
  3. Eug
    +4
    29 September 2022 16: 19
    Composite CBS for a fighter aircraft with the current level of technology is not applicable - primarily because of the "multidirectional" loads and the non-repairability of the plane (it is necessary to change the entire plane in case of mechanical damage, which is expensive). In addition, the main effect when using KOS was supposed to be obtained from improving controllability at low speeds - but they found cheaper and more versatile ways to achieve this goal. There was an interesting brochure with a detailed description of the Su-33KUB, a "revolutionary" aircraft in many respects, everything was described in some detail there. Unfortunately, I don't have this brochure at the moment...
    1. -2
      29 September 2022 16: 53
      “Composite KOS” is a mystery to me, what is a composite wing? Does he have a composite power pack too? What about mechanization? How is it attached to the fuselage? And then what is the center section? After all, the center section is part of the wing. Or is “composite wing” just a buzzword? Solid questions. request
    2. -1
      29 September 2022 18: 03
      Isn't it easier for low speeds to make a new variation of the IL-2?
      A monster about two (turbo) propeller engines, with armor and in general (oh, to attach Tunguska to a plane ...).
    3. +2
      29 September 2022 19: 05
      Quote: Eug
      Unfortunately, I don't have this brochure at the moment...

      Deck combat training fighter Su-33KUB.
      http://авиару.рф/aviamuseum/aviatsiya/rf/morskaya-aviatsiya/palubnyj-uchebno-boevoj-istrebitel-su-33kub/
    4. 0
      1 October 2022 01: 42
      Berkut had another problem lol - too fragile pilot. The wing there is combined, the composite is closer to the tip. Regarding changing the entire wing, nonsense. When saturated with hydraulic systems, etc., etc. on any modern aircraft, the wing should be changed entirely. As soon as a normal robot pilot appears, they will most likely open it. The machine is unique, very ahead of its time, without AI at the helm, it is, alas, useless.
  4. +5
    29 September 2022 16: 45
    For the first time I hear that the IL-14 is an aircraft with a swept wing wing. The author famously turned down. And the second - almost nothing is said about the theory of the swept wing, its advantages and disadvantages, a simple enumeration of the implemented projects. As there was ambiguity in this matter, so it remained.
    1. +5
      29 September 2022 17: 00
      And secondly, almost nothing is said about the theory of the reverse sweep wing, its advantages and disadvantages

      Agree that in order to cover this issue, you must have at least basic knowledge in aerodynamics, which the author does not have at all.
      The main advantage that the reverse swept wing has is that it is devoid of such a harmful phenomenon as end stall. The flow of air along the span of the wing occurs in the opposite direction, that is, to the root of the wing. This allows you to get more lift at low speeds.
      At the same time, the formation of stall zones in the root part of the wing forms a shift in the point of application of the total lifting force, which reduces the longitudinal stability and adversely affects the balance. The way out of this problem is the use of the front horizontal tail, as well as the installation of a triangular influx in the root of the wing. Also, due to the fact that there is a change in the direction of air flow, the intensity of the occurrence of the tip vortex at the wingtips decreases, which reduces the inductive drag and increases the overall aerodynamic quality of the wing. These factors determine the high controllability of aircraft
      with this design at extremely low subsonic speeds, compared with
      straight swept wing. Takeoff and landing characteristics are improved (the required takeoff speed and takeoff run are reduced),
      the speed at which the aircraft enters a spin. High aerodynamic
      quality allows you to reduce the span and wing area. From a technical point of view, this wing allows you to transfer the root part to the rear section of the fuselage, which frees the central part of the body from the wing attachment beams and allows
      to place there a larger volume of tanks or the necessary equipment.
      However, this wing design has significant drawbacks. The fact is that when an aircraft moves at a speed of more than 450 km / h, its resistance
      increases due to the fact that wave resistance is added to the usual air resistance. This effect appears when the gas flows at supersonic speed. The fact is that on the hotel sections of the glider during flight
      at subsonic speeds, there may be zones in which air flows move at supersonic speeds. The wave drag increases sharply as the aircraft approaches the speed of sound, exceeding by several times the usual drag arising from friction and the formation of turbulences. Maximum value
      this effect is achieved at low supersonic speeds in the region of Mach 1-1,4, which is called the wave crisis effect. To solve this problem, aircraft use a forward-swept wing, the purpose of which is to reduce wave drag. It is also subject to the phenomenon of aerodynamic divergence, which, under certain combinations of speed and angle of attack, can provoke progressive deformation of the wing structure up to its destruction. During maneuvering, a large
      aerodynamic load that can bend the wing structure upward. On wings with a forward sweep, such a bend reduces the installation angle of the wing console on the fuselage, that is, its angle of attack decreases. Consequently, the lift force drops and the deformation decreases, however, if the sweep
      reverse, the process is reversed.

      From the article "ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE REVERSE WING".
      1. +2
        29 September 2022 17: 07
        “You must agree that in order to cover this issue, you must have at least basic knowledge in aerodynamics, which the author lacks completely,” I agree completely. Thank you for the excerpt from the article, I read it with pleasure. When I wrote about “obscurity”, I didn’t mean myself, I finished MATI and I know a little about this topic. hi
  5. +2
    29 September 2022 17: 20
    There are a lot of ideas - koylya-fuselage, in the form of a disk, in the form of a circle, biplanes, semi-planes, etc.
    But since they are almost never used, it means a lot of shortcomings. There will be fewer fools in aviation anyway ...
  6. +5
    29 September 2022 17: 22
    Theory and practice of a swept wing


    The title of the article is good, but the content is rather weak, neither the theory really nor the practice is sensible. As an introductory detonator (exciting interest in the topic) it will do, but no more.
    The main problem of KOS is precisely in ensuring strength and torsional rigidity, especially on modern combat aircraft due to the low construction height (thickness).
  7. -1
    29 September 2022 19: 06
    KOS has been developing for too long. States do not live that long.
  8. +4
    29 September 2022 19: 15
    Instead of a reverse-swept wing in civil aviation (I didn’t notice it in the military, but perhaps they are less pronounced), more obvious methods of dealing with stall at the ends of the wings are used - winglets. Many probably paid attention to the fact that on modern liners the tips of the wings are bent up, less often down, or both back and forth, looking like a vertical tail unit. There are also several protruding longitudinal vertical ribs on the wing, which have the same purpose - to prevent the air flow from moving along the wing to its ends.
    1. +1
      30 September 2022 14: 43
      It is - yes, but not only in this matter.
      At the Mosaviashow, everyone sees only aerobatics, and no one sees what is inside the aircraft, and this is more important, if not the main thing.
  9. -2
    29 September 2022 23: 11
    Nature is not full of mind. I did not come up with a single bird with a reverse swept wing. The falcon also folds its wings to the rear, and not to the beak. Only frogs in the cartoon fly with reverse sweep.
    1. +7
      29 September 2022 23: 36
      Quote: zenion
      I did not come up with a single bird with a reverse swept wing. The falcon also folds its wings to the rear, and not to the beak.
      1. +2
        30 September 2022 04: 09
        Pff, the center section is with a return line, and the consoles are with a straight line! laughing
  10. +3
    30 September 2022 04: 03
    He poured water, reprinting a bunch of other people's articles, there is no conclusion
  11. 0
    30 September 2022 18: 25
    Well, maybe something that is not suitable for aircraft with their speeds is ideal for UAVs and high-speed helicopters?
  12. 0
    5 October 2022 18: 50
    Wing forward and reverse sweep, each scheme has advantages and disadvantages, as well as rotors for helicopters, one screw with a vertical compensating and in opposition with a coaxial layout.
    But according to their advantages and disadvantages, each occupies its own niche and one complements the other, for example, how the Mi-28 and Ka-52 interact. Aircraft are different.
  13. 0
    17 November 2022 14: 17
    Make reverse sweep endings on ordinary wings.
  14. 0
    22 December 2022 05: 41
    the Americans conducted tests on the F16 with a reverse swept wing and called the results unpromising and dead ends.
    For a similar reason, at one time they did not let the An72 analogue into the series. Those. in practice, some factors from the theory were achieved, but they were so insignificant that it was not worth fencing a garden for their sake. As it happened with An72/74