Military Review

Bulgaria: sharp turn ahead?

91

Yes, a country whose name we often hear about (and mostly negatively lately) is going to have a big nix. Moreover, the circumstances are very peculiar, and in order to perceive them correctly, one must carefully consider everything.


What for? Well, at least in order to understand whether it is beneficial to us (in the sense of Russia) or not. In neighborly terms, to determine whether it is a blessing or a victory. Or if in Bulgarian - sadness or ruin.

For the Russian ear, both terms sound as if in the same key, don't they? In fact, it does not deceive, that's the way it is.

So, Bulgarian Prime Minister Kirill Petkov left, and not just left, but banged on the door. In general, it is not common for politicians to make such statements, but apparently Petkov was very upset.


Indeed, it is not every day that governments are given such a plop as a vote of no confidence. There is something to worry about, especially considering that the Bulgarian parliament voted 123 votes for no confidence, with the required 121 out of 240 deputies.

The initiators of this step were the deputies of the GERB party, headed by former Prime Minister Boyko Borisov. And they were joined by other parties of the opposition bloc: "Renaissance", "There is such a people" and "Movement for Rights and Freedoms".

In theory, Petkov and his party "Continue Changes" should receive a mandate from the president and try to form a new council of ministers. If they fail, the second mandate will be given to the GERB party. And if the initiators of everything also fail to form a government, then President Radev himself will decide who will receive the right to a third attempt.

If, as a result of these procedures, the government is not formed, the head of state must dissolve the parliament, appoint an official cabinet and announce early elections.

This is the outlook for the near future.

However, Petkov freaked out and resigned.

Moreover, in his statement, he blamed what was happening, describing it as nothing more or less than the overthrow of the government, three Bulgarian politicians (okay, two and a half) and Russian Ambassador to Bulgaria Mitrofanova.

And here it is necessary to analyze everything personally, because there is a dissonance.

We will not discuss Eleonora Mitrofanova, she symbolizes Russia in Bulgaria, everything is clear here. In theory, if everything that is happening is some kind of pro-Russian coup, then yes, the ambassador simply has to be in the know and "in business."

However, we look at those who did it all.

The first person Petkov accused was a certain Delyan Peevski.


This is a Bulgarian oligarch, a media mogul who owns a good half of all media. Yes, this person can easily complicate the life of anyone, this cannot be denied. But to call Peevka pro-Russian is stupid.

In politics, he started in the National Movement of Simeon II, the former last king of Bulgaria. When Simeon of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha was elected head of the country's government, on April 1, 2004, Bulgaria joined NATO under his rule. Then Peevski was a member of the DPS, the Movement for Rights and Freedoms. This is an openly pro-Turkish party that defends the rights of the Turkish minority in Bulgaria.

To Russia - no sideways noticed.

Next, we have the second person involved in the charges, Stanislav/Slavi Trifonov. Musician, also a media figure, founder of the party "There is such a people."

Bulgaria: sharp turn ahead?

The party criticizes Bulgaria's plight, corruption, lack of freedoms, obstruction of business, backward healthcare, and proposes popular measures to improve the situation in the country for every industry. For everything good against everything bad, moreover, the party is a real force.

Moreover, until recently, the party "There is such a people" was in a coalition with the party "Continue to change" of the now former prime minister.

I did not find any intelligible relation to Russia. The party is clearly focused on solving internal problems.

The third is Boyko Borisov.


Former prime minister, founder and head of the GERB party (Citizens for the European Development of Bulgaria). The very name of the party speaks of a European orientation, Borisov himself throughout his premiership demonstrated a restrainedly negative attitude towards Russia. He participated in the Nambucco gas pipeline project, bypassing Russia (the project was not implemented), South Stream held back as best he could.

A participant in numerous scandals within the country, he was arrested on the proposal of the EU prosecutor's office.

With Borisov, everything is more than clear.

And there was also the Renaissance party. This is what it is - "to the heap." The party is new, since 2014, it is headed by Konstadin Konstadinov, a more than original and interesting personality.


In general, Konstadinov reminds me of our Limonov, only in a reduced proportion. A smart man, but somewhat rabid. But his Renaissance party is openly national Russophile, anti-Western and anti-European. That is, our people.

However, the party is simply tiny, in the Bulgarian National Assembly there are only 13 seats out of 240, that is, the party cannot show any serious influence on the events in the country.

And now, according to Petkov, these people, together with the Russian ambassador to Bulgaria, are "guilty of overthrowing the government." A pro-European, a pro-Turk and, at best, a neutral suddenly fell under the malicious influence of the Russian ambassador and decided to overthrow the existing government of Bulgaria, which led the country to prosperity and prosperity.

In general, if you look closely at those who "overthrew", then these are yesterday's rulers. Or behind-the-scenes rulers. Which have already led Bulgaria to a brighter future. Another question is where did they end up.

On the whole, what happened in Bulgaria is a completely normal phenomenon, the same Borisov flew out of the post of prime minister twice, if I'm not mistaken. Didn't make it to the end of the term.

Apparently, the gentlemen did not share something among themselves. In general, it can be seen with the naked eye that Borisov, who constantly quarreled with President Radev and accused him with or without reason, just wants to become prime minister for the fourth time.

Moreover, here Russia represented by the ambassador and the tiny pro-Russian Renaissance party, when at least three influential and wealthy people participate in the “batch” (okay, Peevski is the richest), weighing a lot politically, is not clear.

Of course, you need to blame someone for your troubles, and today it is very topical to blame Russia for everything. The trend has already taken shape.

So yes, the actions of the Petkov government simply did not suit the pro-European and pro-Turkish politicians in Bulgaria. Therefore, no sudden turns and reversals in the foreign and domestic policy of Bulgaria are expected, since these are showdowns between their own. With an attempt to blame everything from sick heads to healthy ones.


But we are used to it. We got rid of pink masks a long time ago, through which fraternal Bulgaria was seen well.

However, in the light of recent events there, on that edge of the warm Black Sea, it would be worth thinking about what you can say in the direction of your Black Sea neighbor, and what to refrain from.

The prime minister, who even resigned, but did not surrender his powers, is an official. Political. And throw such accusations towards a country that for the whole history its existence has not done anything negative in relation to Bulgaria is not worth it.

As practice shows, the approach to solving some problems has recently changed not in the direction of long conversations. And yes, in fact, that sadness, that ruin - the result will be the same. Unfortunately.
Author:
91 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. gsev
    gsev 25 June 2022 05: 14
    +12
    It seems that the Bulgarians have begun to feel that the rejection of Russian gas via the Bulgarian Stream in order to supply weapons for the mass murder of Russians in Ukraine is forcing the Bulgarian elite to think about saving. Pro-Turkish politicians in Bulgaria turned out to be a significant force and began to wipe out from power and financial flows those who did not belong to their clan. Moreover, they are pursuing a policy wisely and beautifully, forcing their opponents to wallow in Russophobia and not see the prospect of a close absorption of Bulgaria by the resurgent Turkish Empire.
    1. Tatyana
      Tatyana 25 June 2022 06: 46
      +3
      Quote: gsev
      It seems that the Bulgarians have begun to feel that the rejection of Russian gas via the Bulgarian Stream in order to supply weapons for the mass murder of Russians in Ukraine is forcing the Bulgarian elite to think about saving.

      The precedent decision of the European Union, which yesterday accepted Ukraine as an EU candidate, also adds fuel to the governmental crisis in Bulgaria.
      Ordinary Balgars spoke out categorically against this decision of the EU and demanded the EXIT of Bulgaria from the EU.
      Bulgaria itself has been a member of the EU since January 1, 2007.

      Bulgarians are outraged by the double standards of the EU towards Bulgaria and Ukraine, because Kyiv received the desired status urgently and contrary to the existing EU rules for this. Namely.
      Balgars believe:
      - that Ukraine is an extremely corrupt, impoverished, and even 8-year warring country! That it does not respect political and civil rights!
      - What From an economic point of view, Ukraine is a highly toxic asset. Moreover, the Ukraine is so ruined that if it is accepted into the EU, the EU will spend so many resources on its restoration that it will go bankrupt.
      - which apparently the ruin of the EU-this is the goal of the United States.
      - What Bulgaria it is necessary to impose a veto so that the Ukrainians stop the policy of assimilation of the Bulgarian community! Even the names have changed! Bulgarian municipalities have a minimum of autonomy. And if there is a division of the territories of Ukraine with Russia, then Bulgaria should actively participate in this and receive the southern part of the Odessa region.
      1. Egoza
        Egoza 25 June 2022 07: 33
        +10
        Quote: Tatiana
        And if there is a division of the territories of Ukraine with Russia, then Bulgaria should actively participate in this and get the southern part of the Odessa region.

        But from this place in more detail, pliz! With what fright does Bulgaria climb into the pie? We can do without snot. The entire territory of Ukraine will belong to the Russian Federation. Or did you want moral compensation after meeting Ukrainian "refugees"?
        1. Pavel57
          Pavel57 29 June 2022 15: 15
          +1
          How many Bulgarian villages are in Ukraine? Less than Hungarian.
      2. Yulian
        Yulian 25 June 2022 10: 14
        +5
        And if there is a division of the territories of Ukraine with Russia, then Bulgaria should actively participate in this and get the southern part of the Odessa region.


        Tanya don't write nonsense! Bulgaria cannot have any territorial claims to these territories, which have never been Bulgarian. The Bulgarians fled there from the Turkish scimitar.
        1. Mikhail3
          Mikhail3 25 June 2022 10: 42
          +7
          Let's ask differently. Tatyana, what materials do you rely on in this statement? It's very curious. Are there really any official Bulgarian statements on this matter?
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 25 June 2022 12: 40
            -7
            Quote: Mikhail3
            Let's ask differently. Tatyana, what materials do you rely on in this statement? It's very curious. Are there really any official Bulgarian statements on this matter?
            Of course, there is no official statement from Bulgaria on this subject yet, and for now I am analyzing only the PALETTE of moods and responses of the COMMON people of the BULGARIAN PEOPLE to the admission of Ukraine to the EU candidates and their view of the state of affairs of the Kyiv regime in Ukraine itself. Namely.
            One side. I am writing that the decision of the EU, of which Bulgaria is a member, was adopted only YESTERDAY,
            Quote: Tatiana
            fuel for the fire and the precedent decision of the European Union, which yesterday - VCHARA (!) - accepted Ukraine as an EU candidate.
            And this means that officially the GOVERNMENT of Bulgaria AGREES with this decision, since Bulgaria did not introduce its veto on this EU decision at the EU meeting.
            And on the other hand, we have the critical opinion of the common people of Bulgaria on this issue of vital importance to them.
            Therefore, firstly, So far, it is SIMPLE Bulgarians who are discussing all this yesterday from all sides and categorically oppose this agreement of their Bulgarian government with the EU decision on this issue in Ukraine.
            And secondly, [the palette of opinions about the fate of the Kyiv regime, about the economic and political expediency of keeping it afloat by the EU countries and at the expense of economic and military assistance from the EU countries is very NEGATIVE, up to the division of the territory of Ukraine by different countries on the basis of the predominance of "titular" nationality in each region of modern Ukraine.
            At the same time, it is known that many Bulgarians live in the southern part of the Odessa region.

            By the way, I did not write that yesterday the EU also accepted R.Moldova as an EU candidate, the president of which is the sorosikha and Romanian citizen Maia Sandu.

            See some of the comments of Bulgarian media readers, while they have not yet been deleted there, to the article "After the historic decision of the Euroleaders, Ukraine and Moldova embarked on the path to the EU" - https://inosmi.ru/20220624/evrosoyuz-254684185.html
            Namely, for example:
            Huh
            What else is a historic decision? Everyone understands perfectly well that this will not happen.
            hehehe
            Did you ask Putin?
            Я
            Bulgaria needs to veto the Ukrainians to stop the policy of assimilation of the Bulgarian community! Even the names have changed! Bulgarian municipalities have a minimum of autonomy, if there is a division of territories with Russia, Bulgaria should actively participate in this and receive the southern part of the Odessa region.

            There may be many comments on articles, but the editors of the media publication publish only the sharpest and most topical of them for a huge circle of their readers. This is the editorial rule.
            1. Dmitry_7
              Dmitry_7 25 June 2022 15: 10
              0
              https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2022/06/25/zhiteli-lisichanska-zhdut-russkih-kak-svoih-osvoboditeley-france-2

              not at all on the topic of the article, but since you are interested in foreign media, there is an interesting video in the link: france2 report from Lisichansk
              1. Dmitry_7
                Dmitry_7 25 June 2022 15: 11
                0
                even better:

                https://www.francetvinfo.fr/monde/europe/manifestations-en-ukraine/guerre-en-ukraine-a-lyssytchansk-l-armee-ukrainienne-se-heurte-a-la-mefiance-d-une-population-pro-russe_5217085.html
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 25 June 2022 15: 15
                  -1
                  Quote: Dmitry_7
                  even better:

                  https://www.francetvinfo.fr/monde/europe/manifestations-en-ukraine/guerre-en-ukraine-a-lyssytchansk-l-armee-ukrainienne-se-heurte-a-la-mefiance-d-une-population-pro-russe_5217085.html

                  Thanks! I will definitely look!
            2. Mikhail3
              Mikhail3 25 June 2022 19: 17
              -2
              Curious) When the Russian troops took Bulgaria from the Turks, established it as a country, the first thing the Bulgarians did was betray the Russians. Looks like this is the national mentality. And the second was the presentation of territorial claims to neighbors. That is, this idea - on the sly to take away the land from whoever succeeds, is it not some kind of "decision of the ruling clique", but the idea of ​​​​the most ordinary Bulgarians? Thanks for the informative answer, Tatiana)
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 25 June 2022 19: 59
                -1
                Quote: Mikhail3
                That is, this idea - on the sly to take away the land from whoever succeeds, is it not some kind of "decision of the ruling clique", but the idea of ​​​​the most ordinary Bulgarians?

                Most likely, this is the reaction of ordinary Bulgarians to the reaction of the need of R.Moldova to have access by land to the Black Sea through the territory of accession to Moldova of the southern part of the Odessa region in the event of the division of the territory of Ukraine

                And then the pro-Romanian Republic of Moldova may become part of Romania. And if this happens, then the Bulgarians of Ukraine from the Odessa region. will, in fact, in the future under the Nazi-Romanians.

                I think that such a prospect of a missed opportunity to unite the ethnic Bulgarians of Bulgaria and the Bulgarians of Ukraine does not please the ethnic Bulgarians themselves, as a people.
                Most likely, the reason for the territorial concern of ordinary Bulgarians - on the example of the linguistic discrimination of Bulgarians by the Kyiv regime - lies in this.
                1. Mikhail3
                  Mikhail3 25 June 2022 22: 54
                  -1
                  Yes, there are reasons. There are no forces here. And therefore, some people behave like a garbage rat, trying to grab from someone else's table what cannot be won back. This does not happen) It was Russia that gave rise to the dreams of freeloaders. Nurtured them. The Bulgarians did not deserve any state, but they got it from our hands. It didn't work for anyone...
                  1. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 26 June 2022 00: 51
                    -2
                    Besides. If, during the division of the territory of Ukraine, R.Moldova will receive the southern part of the Odessa region. Ukraine, and then the pro-Romanian R. Moldova will become part of Romania, then Bulgaria will remain territorially surrounded by land only by Romania - i.e. Bulgaria will have no land corridors and borders with other countries.
                    Then, in this case, Bulgaria will be politically and economically subordinate in the end to the same Romania. The sovereignty of Bulgaria in the future will be threatened by Romania.

                    For example. Let's remember how Lithuania is behaving now and bending the stick in front of Russia, dictating its conditions to our country on the use of the overland communication corridor between Russia and the Kaliningrad region. So this corridor is used by us legally - on the basis of an international legal basis!
                    And Bulgaria will not have such a corridor with other countries.
                    Romania simply in this case will turn Bulgaria into its protectorate, Romanize the Bulgarians and eventually absorb it completely.

                    So ordinary Bulgarians and Bulgarians in state power have much to worry about!

                    In this case, the point is not even in the long-standing history of Bulgaria and the Bulgarian people, but in the new historical circumstances for them in the world.
                    1. Mikhail3
                      Mikhail3 26 June 2022 09: 46
                      0
                      True, if Russia takes Odessa with the region, then the position of the Bulgarians will be much easier, right?) True, the position of the Bulgarians, who rely on the United States, will become terribly bad. And those who have not broken pots with Russia will be on top.
                      Well, more. The smallest boat can carry much more cargo than the largest cart. Whoever has seaports always has plenty of opportunities.
              2. stankow
                stankow 26 June 2022 00: 46
                -1
                Tatyana terribly confused Macedonia and Ukraine laughing
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 26 June 2022 01: 29
                  -1
                  Well no! I'm talking specifically about the Bulgarians in Ukraine in the Odessa region. how about Bulgaria, i.e. as a potential part of Bulgaria, like how about the Kaliningrad region. as part of Russia.
                  Perhaps I did not quite express myself clearly and understandably at the same time, naming in the conversation hypothetically the potentially southern part of the Odessa region. already Bulgaria.
                  But I believe that the participants still understand what is at stake.
              3. nedgen
                nedgen 26 June 2022 22: 26
                +1
                Quote: Mikhail3
                Curious) When the Russian troops took Bulgaria from the Turks, established it as a country, the first thing the Bulgarians did was betray the Russians. Looks like this is the national mentality. And the second was the presentation of territorial claims to neighbors. That is, this idea - on the sly to take away the land from whoever succeeds, is it not some kind of "decision of the ruling clique", but the idea of ​​​​the most ordinary Bulgarians? Thanks for the informative answer, Tatiana)

                And where did you get such data from (about the fact that the Bulgarians immediately showed territorial claims against their neighbors? Apparently you don’t know anything about the history of the Balkans at all. I suggest you look at the map of Bulgaria according to the San Stefano peace treaty and then put this map on the map of the modern Balkans! the map of the treaty essentially shows territories inhabited PRIMALLY BULGARIANS !!! Then compare with the map of modern Bulgaria and then talk nonsense about territorial claims !!!! But if you compare the territory of the Kingdom of Serbia from 1878 and Yugoslavia from 1920, you can answer for yourself who whose territories he captured!!! But you can’t bear it. It’s easier to repeat the myths that the Bulgarians are aggressors and attacked "peaceful" neighbors. And the fact that the neighbors - and the same Serbs created the Macedonian nation and language in 1945-47 and destroyed tens of thousands Bulgarians who did not want to call themselves Macedonians, just like they once created the Ukrainian nation, this does not concern you. upvote my post. It is designed for people who can think and analyze with their own head. hi
                More about the betrayal of the Russians by the Bulgarians. And who in 1885, during the unification of the Principality of Bulgaria and Eastern Rumelia, removed ALL military advisers (essentially commanders) from the young (only 6-year-old) Bulgarian army, leaving Bulgarian captains and majors to command brigades? Is it not the Russian Empire by any chance? Or is that also not a betrayal? And if this is not betrayal, what then? And I still don’t remember the Berlin Congress when RI allowed the victory to be stolen from her and also allowed Bulgaria to be divided into FIVE parts? Well, yes, the Berlin Congress is not so much Russia's fault as the so-called. west. And note, I will NEVER allow myself to blame the Russian people for all the betrayals of the Republic of Ingushetia and Russia, because you see the Russian people have such a mentality !!!
                1. Mikhail3
                  Mikhail3 26 June 2022 22: 41
                  0
                  Quote: nedgen
                  It is designed for people who can think and analyze with their own head.

                  So glad. I know that the Russian people have a bad mentality. I already heard it. The analysis of everything you stated is simple. The Bulgarians are unworthy of having their own country, for the simple reason that they are not able to win it back.
                  The Bulgarians received the country from the hands of Russia. In the form and in the volume in which Russia, which is able to win back the country, decided to give them this country. All your demagogy is demagogy. I don't care that Bulgarians live somewhere. This does not give you the right to consider such places as Bulgaria.
                  In a sense, one can respect the attempt of the Bulgarians to win what they want. Application for self-construction of the country. But the Bulgarians were, as expected, unable to.
                  There is enough arrogance. But in order for Bulgaria not to disappear, impudence is not enough, something must be done. It's impossible to fight. Again they will stick, and this time they will apparently destroy it. The same Serbs are tough guys, they lost only to the entire NATO bloc as a whole. Well, the Bulgarians were casually brought in by everyone who wanted to. It is necessary to choose the one who will protect with a guarantee. Now there is another moment when it can be done in a new way. Make no mistake)
                  1. nedgen
                    nedgen 27 June 2022 17: 22
                    0
                    Quote: Mikhail3

                    So glad. I know that the Russian people have a bad mentality. I already heard it. The analysis of everything you stated is simple. The Bulgarians are unworthy of having their own country, for the simple reason that they are not able to win it back.

                    I wonder if I even said a word about the fact that the Russian people have a bad mentality? I don't remember something like that.

                    Quote: Mikhail3
                    The Bulgarians received the country from the hands of Russia. In the form and in the volume in which Russia, which is able to win back the country, decided to give them this country. All your demagogy is demagogy. I don't care that Bulgarians live somewhere. This does not give you the right to consider such places as Bulgaria.


                    Oh really? And what then gives you the right to consider Crimea Russian? Of course, I think that Crimea should be Russian, but according to your logic, you should return both Donbas and Lugansk and Crimea to the Ukraine because they were part of it and the fact that Russians live there does not give you the right to annex these territories !!!

                    Quote: Mikhail3
                    In a sense, one can respect the attempt of the Bulgarians to win what they want. Application for self-construction of the country. But the Bulgarians were, as expected, unable to. There is enough arrogance. But in order for Bulgaria not to disappear, impudence is not enough, something must be done. It's impossible to fight. Again they will stick, and this time they will apparently destroy it.


                    As you can immediately see, to put it mildly, the history of the Balkans is unknown. Yes, Bulgaria has lost territories inhabited not by Bulgarians, but MOSTLY by Bulgarians. There is a difference, you see my friend. But not because they fought badly, but because the so-called. Elite ALWAYS chose the sinful side. And this shows the course of hostilities both in the war of 1885 and in 1912-1913 and even in 1916-1918. And even in 1913, there was a chance to win if the bastard Ferdinand started that war correctly, he had a chance to pile on both the Serbs and the Greeks (the Greeks, however, were piled on so much in 1913 that the road to Solun was open), but at that time, because of a very "friendly "The relations of Nicholas 2 of Romania entered the war and hit us in the back and reached Sofia because there were no troops against them from the word at all.

                    Quote: Mikhail3
                    The same Serbs are tough guys, they lost only to the entire NATO bloc as a whole. Well, the Bulgarians were casually brought in by everyone who wanted to. It is necessary to choose the one who will protect with a guarantee. Now there is another moment when it can be done in a new way. Make no mistake)


                    And who interestingly defeated us on the battlefield? Serbs? Maybe the Greeks? Or Turks? Only the Romanians managed to reach Sofia, and then because there were no troops at all against them. And how many Bulgarian military flags are now in foreign museums? I will suggest NONE. It means that they still knew how to fight. And NOBODY had time to pile on us. Even the Russian army in World War I!! I don’t even want to remember about the Romanian in World War I. We entered 1917 in Bucharest. But the fact that we do not care to be in NATO ABSOLUTELY AGREE, but NO ONE ASKED us. Even if tomorrow there is a referendum on withdrawing from NATO, most likely at least 55-60% of the population will vote for! But you don't care about that!
        2. Bagatur
          Bagatur 25 June 2022 15: 13
          +2
          We have no claims against anyone! What kind of stupidity? Only a self-guided person to whom vodka came for - more can talk like that ...
      3. stankow
        stankow 26 June 2022 00: 42
        0
        Tatyana has confused Ukraine with Macedonia. Bulgarians have nothing against accepting Ukraine as a "candidate". Soberly realizing that this is only a symbolic "act". And absolutely no ter. have no claims. Yes, and how, to step over Ruminia, or something, there is no common border with Independent laughing
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 26 June 2022 08: 14
          0
          Damn it! But I didn’t invent what the Bulgarians themselves write about this in the media!
          I gave a link to their statement in the media above!

          And this means that it is not a crazy Bulgarian who squeaks such things in a commentary, but such ideas “walk” in the heads of the Bulgarian population and have objective justifications!

          Moreover, analogous thoughts and intentions regarding the partition of Ukraine and the annexation of its territory to Poland have long been walking in the minds of the Poles of Poland and Ukraine, as well as other peoples of countries neighboring Ukraine.

          The same problem of countering the dictatorship of the Ukrainian Nazism and the chauvinism of the Kyiv regime in the form of Russophobia and the GENOCIDE of Russians was also faced by Ukrainian Russians in Crimea, the DPR and the DPR. A PROBLEM that Russia was also forced to solve both in 2014 and now in 2022.

          If you think that the Ukrainian Bulgarians do not have the same problem, then this is your purely personal opinion. It is good, of course, that you have this opinion, however, it does not do the weather for the Bulgarians of Ukraine under the Western Nazi Kiev regime. Colonial assimilation by the West by Nazi measures in Ukraine under the Kiev regime of the Nazi Jew Zelensky went on and is still going at full speed!
          Only Russia can stop it.
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 26 June 2022 08: 40
            0
            Quote: Tatiana
            Only Russia can stop it.

            And you, Stankob, in this matter of liberating the population of Ukraine from the DICTATORY of the Nazis of the Kyiv regime, with your misunderstanding of the essence of the national problems of what is happening on the theater of war in Ukraine, put spokes in the wheels.
            1. Mikhail3
              Mikhail3 26 June 2022 10: 00
              0
              I mean, it started. Before the collapse of the USSR, the situation in Europe was frozen. The European countries that had been slaughtering each other for thousands of years, appearing and disappearing, changing configurations almost every year, were able to rest.
              Part of Europe was under the USSR, part under the USA. The sovereigns forbade them to fight so that everything would not collapse into a nuclear apocalypse. This very quickly led to the fact that Europe rotted. Whole. The Eastern bloc did not rot much, but was terribly jealous of the Western one, because it is fun and pleasant to rot and decompose, especially when there is someone to rob for your sweet life. Europe merrily plundered Africa and the East, and fattened on the loot, boasting in front of gloomy hard workers.
              The Eastern bloc had to make money on its own, and this is fundamentally not so fun and comfortable. The USSR gave what it could, but it was incomparable with the robbery of entire continents.
              In general, the Europeans are rotten. What we see. After all, their countries have lived under severe external pressure for thousands of years, there was a tough selection. If you do a bad housekeeping and fight badly, your neighbors will eat you up. And suddenly... Lick the USA's ass and you can do whatever you want. Fooling, stealing, not working at all, anyone can come to power, and the country is not harmed, no one risks anything. Europe could not stand copper pipes ...
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 26 June 2022 11: 29
                0
                Why are you writing this sarcasm to me? You need to look at the root of the problem consistently and without omissions from today back in order to understand the past, at least for the last century.
                The whole point of the post-war well-being of the United States after WWII / WWII - in part - was due to the international peg of national currencies to the US dollar - and the Soviet ruble as well. Namely.

                In the USSR, as a result of Western economic sanctions against our country since 1937, the ruble was already pegged to the US dollar - i.e. the exchange rate of the Soviet ruble was calculated against foreign currencies on the basis of the US dollar (although since December 1943 the USSR had already developed a financial and credit system to decouple national currencies - the Soviet ruble - from the US dollar).

                Then, in July 1944, the Bretton Woods system of currency relations and international mutual settlements was introduced in the world, which lasted until 1976. The international ratification of this system was in 1945.
                Prior to this, the events were as follows:
                - May 22, 1945 in the UK developed a plan for the operation "Unthinkable" against the USSR.
                - In August 1945, the United States carried out an atomic bombing of the cities of Japan.
                - On September 4, 1945, the United States - according to "Memorandum No. 329" - outlined 20 cities of the USSR for American atomic bombing in case of confrontation between the United States and Great Britain against Soviet Russia.

                POSTWAR essence of international relations between the WINNER COUNTRIES was that The USSR was an equal partner of the anti-Hitler coalition, and Stalin was going to maintain a similar position for the post-war period. In this case, Stalin intended - and it is right! - to share with the Anglo-Saxons a sphere of influence not only in Europe and Asia, but also in the economy. The ruble zone is the dollar and pound zone.

                However, it is after the American atomic bombing of Japan, which demonstratively frightened the USSR, the United States and Great Britain, as a result of the Bretten Woods agreement, denied the USSR the equality of the victorious countries and offered the USSR, in fact, to become their satellite, giving Stalin time to think before December 1945 for an answer.

                Therefore, in connection with the above events on the part of the United States and Great Britain in December 1945, Stalin refused to ratify the Bretton Woods agreement, although he had signed the documents of the agreement in July 1944 before that.

                And then in 1947 Truman came out with his doctrine "in defense of democracy and against socialism." And on August 29, 1949, the USSR tested its atomic bomb.
                As a result of all this, the so-called. The cold war of the USA against the USSR is precisely because Stalin refused to surrender the national sovereignty of the USSR to the USA. Gorbachev and Yeltsin will hand him over.

                The 1947 currency reform is our response to the Bretton Woods Accords (WAC)
                1. Mikhail3
                  Mikhail3 26 June 2022 11: 49
                  0
                  Not understood. What's with the sarcasm? My description is no different from yours, you're just too accustomed to think officially) Yes, the United States has become good. But bandits don't share. They allow other bandits to rob the victims as part of their gang, this is the maximum. This is what the United States did with Europe, allowing their corporations to scoop up resources from the places I indicated under their roof. Sometimes the armies of Europe participated directly in NATO raids, but strong European troops are not beneficial to the United States, and now they are practically gone. Well, etc.
                  And now the moment has come when the godfather is already robbing his own gang. There was no loot. Only France, England and Germany can build at least some kind of their own plans to rob the weakest. Bulgaria cannot. And never could.
                  But the ambition remained) And Russia, which created this "state" on its own head, is to blame for this ambition. Having firmly hammered into the head of the Bulgarians that they can grab a piece from the table without fighting for it), Germany and France still remember what happens when you have to fight. These parasites are not
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 26 June 2022 12: 22
                    0
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    Stalin refused to surrender the national sovereignty of the USSR to the United States. Gorbachev and Yeltsin will surrender him.

                    But they were not the first to start this in the post-war period. And Khrushchev started it with his Khrushchev reforms in the USSR in 1961.
                    It was Khrushchev who moved away from the Stalinist position of not pegging the Soviet ruble to the US dollar and pegged it to the dollar as a result of his 1961 financial reform.

                    This peg of the ruble to the US dollar in favor of pumping the wealth of the USSR to the West as a result of wrecking agricultural reforms in the country by Khrushchev after Stalin served in the future to the steady impoverishment of the USSR in favor of the West in a colonial-monetary manner. At the same time, the West grew rich, and the Soviet people lived on small salaries from paycheck to paycheck, envying, as you say, the material well-being of the working people and the economic development of the power of the countries of the capitalist West. By the way, due to Khrushchev's peg of the Soviet ruble to the FRSUS dollar.

                    1961 Money Reform of the Year.


                    The monetary reform of 1961 - the destruction of the economy of the USSR.

                    1. Mikhail3
                      Mikhail3 26 June 2022 13: 09
                      0
                      I don't really understand who you are referring to. To myself?) In my youth I was aware of the situation in agriculture. True, not under Khrushchev, but under the late Brezhnev. How do you like the yield of 3-4 centners per hectare? Maybe we overpaid for American grain. But we ourselves had just such a yield literally throughout central Russia.
                      Horrible, right? And do you know how it came to this? This is an anecdote. Raykom managed the sowing. Not agronomists. Not farm directors. And the district committee. According to the results of spring sowing, medals and other benefits were received there. The main indicator was - who "drops out" earlier. The sooner, the more medals. And the harvest ... well, what about the harvest? "The weather did not spoil us"))
                      They sowed in the snow. Constantly. How else to drop out earlier? In the village, constant drunkenness took root. To nightmare, to horror. How not to drink with such violence over the earth? It was impossible for a real peasant to look at this with a sober look. The whole country could not grow bread normally ... because of what ?! But because of this.
                      Nevertheless, I believe that the USSR was the only hope of mankind. Ruined by disgusting, completely incompetent management.
                      Yes, and more. Money at this level is nothing. The USSR received something real for paper - grain. Once he received grain, it means that he did not lose fatally. Although I got dollars at extortionate rates.
                  3. Tatyana
                    Tatyana 26 June 2022 13: 23
                    0
                    Quote: Mikhail3
                    But the ambition remained) And Russia, which created this "state" on its own head, is to blame for this ambition. Having firmly hammered into the head of the Bulgarians that they can grab a piece from the table without fighting for it), Germany and France still remember what happens when you have to fight. These parasites are not

                    A buffer zone of neutral, pro-Soviet and pro-Russian countries along the Russian (Soviet) borders of Russia/USSR should have been there then and should be there now. We can clearly see this with our own eyes now on the example of the enemy Ukraine, Poland, Tribaltia, Kazakhstan, etc. during TVL on the territory of Ukraine.

                    And this costs money, which is not only blood in the economic development of the state, but also one of the means of ensuring the military border national security of states.

                    Khrushchev with his deplorable reforms in defiance of Stalin; agricultural, financial and intra-party in the CPSU itself - handed over Soviet finances to the US Federal Reserve. With these Soviet finances, the United States and the collective West waged a Cold War with the USSR, bought buffer countries from the USSR - and ultimately the USSR lost this war to the United States and the collective West as a result of the final betrayal of the Motherland in the person of Gorbachev and the surrender of the USSR in the Cold War in the person of Yeltsin , Tsushkevich and Kravchuk!
                    1. Mikhail3
                      Mikhail3 26 June 2022 13: 42
                      0
                      Buffer - of course. It's impossible to argue with you here. As for money...
                      You don't understand what economics is. I'm not reproachful, almost no one now understands. "Textbooks" on it cannot be read if you do not have an engineering education and experience of real work "on the ground". Because there is a terrible nonsense written ...
                      In general, it was like this. The USSR sold on the international market a "product of low processing". For which dollars and received. What is the difference between low and high added value sales? If you're underpaid for high redistribution, you're done. You cannot train specialists who should participate in production en masse, you cannot pay them adequately, you cannot build factories of gigantic value. Therefore, you cannot maintain your market share, you go broke.
                      And the low cut? That is, the extracted raw materials? And in its price, the share of qualified people and resource-intensive machines is relatively small. Mother earth has already done most of the work for you. You spend little, and therefore you can afford low prices. So the USSR did not lose, despite dumping) Your constructions are not correct, sorry.
                      Khrushchev tried to establish an exchange of pieces of paper for pieces of paper. Untie their value from resources, bring things to the current state, when the United States receives real, material benefits for computer zeros. Then the USSR was in the position of the USA, since zeros on a piece of paper (there were no computers yet) could write as many as you like. And the United States did not welcome his efforts, but hampered them in every possible way. So they understood the real state of things ...
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. Tatyana
                        Tatyana 26 June 2022 14: 38
                        0
                        And you ask me how much they paid engineers in production in the same military-industrial complex system and in light industry. Only to devour yourself! And if he is married, and a child was born, then goodbye to the profession - engineers, young specialists go anywhere: to working specialties. for example, as bus drivers, if you're lucky, loaders, etc., just to feed your family even with a working wife.

                        Against the background of the city, the village will feed itself, but in the city you need to buy food for a salary. You won't eat iron. Hunger is not an aunt!
                        Under Khrushchev, due to the poor supply of cities with food and low wages in the cities of the USSR, there were strikes in factories with executions of demonstrators by the authorities.

                        At the same time, the exchange rate of the ruble against the dollar when the ruble is pegged to the dollar and to other foreign currencies is determined precisely by the foreign bank of the US Federal Reserve with a usurious interest for a foreign bank - i.e. with a gesheft on a currency exchange for a foreign country - provided that at the same time Russia can issue rubles exactly as much as it corresponds to the amount of American (foreign) dollars purchased by Russia. And this sold amount of currency can be limited by the bank to the buying country.

                        Watch both videos above carefully from start to finish!
                      3. Mikhail3
                        Mikhail3 26 June 2022 16: 25
                        0
                        Lord) Yes, I know about engineers) You see, there is no connection between the salary of a Soviet engineer and the exchange rate of the ruble. Not at all, at all. The USSR issued as many rubles as it saw fit. And he paid his employees as much as he wanted.
                        The number of foreign currency rubles had no effect on this) The USSR was failing what should have been its essence - planning. In particular, he arranged for an overproduction of engineers. Made my higher education too accessible. He didn't need those engineers. And there were drivers. Since the USSR was not a prison, it struggled with its own mistakes - low wages.
                        Also, cruel mistakes in the planning system led to the fact that the Soviet people, in principle, could not be paid more - there were not enough quality goods to meet demand. Under Brezhnev, more money was given - a deficit arose, and off we go ...
                        Understand, at the state level, the amount of money itself is just a calculated value.
                      4. Tatyana
                        Tatyana 27 June 2022 04: 26
                        0
                        Quote: MikhailZ
                        The number of foreign currency rubles had no effect on this) The USSR was failing what should have been its essence - planning. In particular,
                        arranged for an overproduction of engineers. Made my higher education too accessible.
                        He didn't need those engineers.
                        Isn't it the same in Russia now? In my opinion, in the post-Soviet era, with the availability of higher education according to the Bologna system, it became even more fun - the entrance exams to the university after school do not need to be taken by school graduates at all!
                        Quote: Mikhail3
                        The number of foreign currency rubles had no effect on this)

                        If the number of foreign currency rubles had no effect on the economy of the USSR / Russia, then why did the US Federal Reserve set and sets its own dollar rate against other currencies, including the ruble?
                        What then do you think was, is and will be the point in this, if the USSR and Russia can without US control, to produce in their country ANY issue of rubles - i.e. print as many rubles as the USSR and Russia want, and thereby block any exchange rate of the US dollar against the ruble with the issue of rubles?
                      5. Mikhail3
                        Mikhail3 27 June 2022 08: 58
                        0
                        Do not confuse God's gift with scrambled eggs, and the current situation with the situation in the USSR. The USSR was not organized in the same way as the modern country, and everything in it worked in a completely different way. For example, if something like 2008 had happened under the existing USSR, the USSR would have destroyed half of the world economy) Only in those years the capitalists did not sink like that, the self-preservation instinct worked)
                        It is not necessary to interfere in a specific issue with the whole world history. Otherwise, this does not look like an analytical analysis, but like a domestic quarrel. If you have the correct questions, and not "why is there an elderberry in the garden, since an uncle is in Kyiv," I will try to answer as far as my mind suffices.
                2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Incvizitor
      Incvizitor 25 June 2022 23: 52
      +1
      It would be nice if the Turks captured this territory and made Kuz'kin's mother there for everyone.
    3. bulgaria_
      bulgaria_ 29 June 2022 16: 06
      0
      You didn't understand anything laughing . The West and the Turks and Greeks and everyone around (or maybe the USSR in the past) made it so that only 30% of the citizens vote. We do not have true politics - in the mind of the sovereigns. I always voted for the socialist party, but Korneniya Ninova sent her into the corner. Now I will vote for the Renaissance (Kostadinov's party). If there is a wire - no voice. What do you think? We have not had any referendum on NATO and the EU.
  2. Andy_nsk
    Andy_nsk 25 June 2022 05: 26
    +16
    At best, Russia can expect from Bulgaria a more balanced approach in relations - no more. The pro-Russian policy of Bulgaria will not and never has been - it is enough to recall the participation of Bulgaria in two world wars. Sleep in peace heroes of Shipka, we remember you, Bulgarians - no!
    1. stankow
      stankow 26 June 2022 00: 54
      +1
      The Bulgarians remember Shipka and Plevny very well. The monuments are under 500, none have been demolished and all are well maintained. If you don't know, don't judge!
    2. Mikhail3
      Mikhail3 26 June 2022 13: 28
      0
      Quote from Andy_nsk
      Sleep in peace heroes of Shipka, we remember you, Bulgarians - no!

      Why, well, they remember. It is believed that the heroes should have tried much harder and seized much more land for Bulgaria. So remember the heroes ... with hatred. Heroes took pity on Russian blood for Bulgarian freeloaders! Ugh...
      1. nedgen
        nedgen 26 June 2022 22: 43
        +1
        Quote: Mikhail3
        Quote from Andy_nsk
        Sleep in peace heroes of Shipka, we remember you, Bulgarians - no!

        Why, well, they remember. It is believed that the heroes should have tried much harder and seized much more land for Bulgaria. So remember the heroes ... with hatred. Heroes took pity on Russian blood for Bulgarian freeloaders! Ugh...

        And who told you this nonsense? Have you witnessed yourself? It's unlikely. We heard a lot of zombies and went to repeat nonsense. We have a national holiday in Bulgaria on March 3, the day of the end of the Russian-Turkish war. And NONE of the normal people (thugs are everywhere, but then they and their thugs are always not enough otherwise they would not be thugs, they would be considered normal) did not say such nonsense. Yes, at the beginning of 2000, I watched on TV they showed some unknown star of historical science (in terms of age, she was hardly more than 28-30 years old or even less) and only heard from her that you see, it was not necessary for RI to free us would have freed themselves, and such a storm arose in the newspapers and on TV that this person was nowhere and NEVER shown again. And do you remember just a couple of months ago how ordinary people defended the monument to the Soviet Army in Sofia? And what about the marches of many thousands to Shipka on March 3rd? And all this is in memory and in gratitude to the Russian liberators. Of course, we ALWAYS have the so-called. Elite lay down under everyone who turns a blind eye to her crimes, but you have the SAME. Remember Gorbachev and Yeltsin. Specially write with a small letter. They don't deserve anything else. That's all for now.
  3. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 25 June 2022 05: 59
    +7
    Let them stew in their own juice ... the output will still be a spoiled product.
    Bulgaria is an extremely unreliable partner ... with whom I would never have serious business.
    1. Egoza
      Egoza 25 June 2022 09: 44
      +1
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Bulgaria is an extremely unreliable partner ... with whom I would never have serious business.

      Calm down, Lech! Their Vanga said that Bulgaria would become part of the new USSR (or Russia). so never say never
      1. Kayala
        Kayala 25 June 2022 10: 55
        +3
        Or maybe we don’t need such a “gift”, why do we need to feed more like “brothers”, who can then also stick a knife in the back at any moment?
    2. stankow
      stankow 26 June 2022 01: 01
      +1
      Anyone who is an enemy of Bulgaria, he is not a friend of Russia! Anyone who is an enemy of Russia is not a friend of Bulgaria. Most likely, he is against both Russia and Bulgaria, and even more so - the friendship of the two peoples. So moderate your drinking, do not pour water into the mill of Russophobes.
  4. andrewkor
    andrewkor 25 June 2022 06: 11
    +7
    Even these "brothers" (choose the epithet yourself), the tongue does not dare to call!
  5. riwas
    riwas 25 June 2022 06: 31
    +3
    Bulgaria: sharp turn ahead?

    Internal graters inside Bulgaria, the attitude towards Russia will not be reflected in any way.
    1. stankow
      stankow 26 June 2022 01: 07
      0
      But the war and its outcome will lead to great changes in Eastern Europe. This is where things heat up. Pro-American angry smell bad. Putin's ultimatum to return NATO to the state of 1997... They don't say it out loud, but they remember.
  6. Nyrobsky
    Nyrobsky 25 June 2022 06: 39
    +11
    Everything is as usual - "the pans are fighting, and the serfs' forelocks are cracking."
    Whoever comes to power there, but the general course of Bulgaria towards European association and NATO membership will not change, the elite is eager for financial flows, and the Bulgarians count stotinki.
  7. parusnik
    parusnik 25 June 2022 07: 07
    +4
    Horseradish, radishes, not sweeter .. Petkov was dumped together, and then, as in a song, their paths will diverge and they will not meet by chance ..
  8. Ros 56
    Ros 56 25 June 2022 07: 23
    +7
    Everyone who is somehow ill with Russophobia should feel on their own skin all 33 "pleasures" from this phenomenon. And enough of these tales about the fraternal people, this people chose this government, so let them sip with a full spoon.
  9. serg.shishkov2015
    serg.shishkov2015 25 June 2022 07: 33
    +8
    I got rid of pink glasses a long time ago! but it was oh so hard and painful! I sincerely loved this country since childhood! Everything, *brothers*! live as you wish! and save yourself, if that!
  10. Egoza
    Egoza 25 June 2022 07: 44
    +12
    Proud of the Russian woman Mitrofanova! Well, it’s necessary how she inspired all these men to a feat! "He will stop the elephant on the run, he will set fire to the whole of Bulgaria"))) probably the first time when it is not Putin's fault, but Mitrofanova's! )))
  11. couch
    couch 25 June 2022 08: 24
    +3
    it is not clear why the Bulgarians began to exalt and help after the Second World War? these people fought on the side of fascist Germany, and if we had not broken its back, it is not clear how relations with the Bulgarians would have developed further. Therefore, considering them friends is a serious mistake of our leadership since the times of the USSR
    1. Yulian
      Yulian 25 June 2022 10: 10
      +2
      Bulgaria during WWII did not fight with the Russians. There was an ally of Germany, but our troops were in neighboring Yugoslavia and Greece and fought with the partisans. Such Balkan showdowns after the loss of territory during the defeat of WWI. The Red Army also did not fight on the territory of Bulgaria. Today, the Turks and Anglo-Saxons really want to make Ukrainians out of us, but don't be caught by their bait. Turkey will always be your mortal enemy, not Bulgaria.
      1. Kayala
        Kayala 25 June 2022 11: 02
        +4
        Of course, there is truth in what you say. Bulgaria seems to be not our enemy (in words), but certainly not a friend. Excuse me, but all the actions of Bulgaria since its liberation from the Turkish yoke indicate that Bulgaria is not a friend to us, but it seems like an enemy, but not quite, but half, or rather half a bump. Something like this... request
        1. Bagatur
          Bagatur 25 June 2022 15: 15
          -4
          RI wanted to replace the Ottomans, that's the reason for all the conflicts in our relationship!
          1. ZAV69
            ZAV69 25 June 2022 20: 59
            -3
            Probably in vain. The Turks cut you a little.
            1. stankow
              stankow 26 June 2022 01: 19
              0
              But liberals, like you, were scolded a lot!
    2. malyvalv
      malyvalv 25 June 2022 12: 13
      +6
      Bulgarians did not fight with the USSR. Although formally they were part of the Nazi coalition. But they just fought with the Wehrmacht. In 1945, the reflection of the German counterattack near Balaton was largely their merit.
  12. comradChe
    comradChe 25 June 2022 09: 06
    +5
    I see an amazing mirror image of certain Russian trends. The corruption and isolation of the elite and the oligorchy from their extremely patient and obediently lazy (in a good way) good-natured people. We are very similar, and we have common enemies - a boorishly deceitful Hohloelita.
    1. stankow
      stankow 26 June 2022 01: 23
      +1
      Finally. Lived to hear a bad word. I share your opinion!
      1. comradChe
        comradChe 26 June 2022 22: 29
        0
        Unfortunately, only emotions, and no knowledge at all.
  13. Dmitry Karabanov
    Dmitry Karabanov 25 June 2022 10: 46
    +6
    Well, it’s worth being objective - Bulgaria, in its entire history, has ALWAYS been on the side of Russia’s enemies. So it's high time to say goodbye to the "brothers" - let them live as they want. We need a "business - nothing personal" approach. And there, without oil-gas-coal, they themselves will crawl to us on their knees.
    1. gsev
      gsev 25 June 2022 12: 22
      +3
      Quote: Dmitry Karabanov
      And there, without oil-gas-coal, they themselves will crawl to us on their knees.

      The extraction of oil, coal and gas and their transportation is a long and labor-intensive process, which also requires large capital relations. I think it’s better for us to trade energy resources not directly with Bulgaria, but through Turkey, which has proven that in mutually beneficial economic cooperation it is better able to find mutual understanding with Russia and Bulgaria than Russia and Bulgaria between themselves. And after 1921, according to Ataturk's behest, the Turks, unlike Bulgaria, did not rush into all dubious Russophobic adventures.
    2. Yulian
      Yulian 25 June 2022 12: 52
      +2
      Comrade, you have a very selective memory. I forgot that for 45 years Bulgaria was the closest ally of the USSR. October Revolution Day was an official holiday and every Friday they watched Soviet television, and the center of Sofia was one to one copy of Kyiv. All this was a cart for the ridicule of all the neighbors, and in the first place, Serbia, beloved by you now, and also Yugoslavia. And the Turks will always be your enemies who dream of a historical revenge.
      1. gsev
        gsev 25 June 2022 22: 29
        -1
        Quote: Julian
        Comrade, you have a very selective memory.

        Joint cultural events will not replace military and political assistance. Despite the friction between the PRC and the USSR, it was the Chinese who shed their blood in Indochina during the Vietnam War. Apparently, most Russians were killed by Bulgarian ammunition out of all the ammunition produced after 1995 outside the former USSR. At the latest technical exhibitions in Moscow, the Turks are the most numerous in terms of the number of company representatives who came to Moscow to establish economic contacts. Some believe that the number of Turks outnumbers all foreign participants combined. Why should Russia refuse the outstretched hand of friendship in favor of partners who, with their actions, from the beginning of the Syrian campaign, inflict maximum military damage on the Russians.
        1. Yulian
          Yulian 26 June 2022 10: 55
          0
          Why should Russia refuse the outstretched hand of friendship in favor of partners who, with their actions, from the beginning of the Syrian campaign, inflict maximum military damage on the Russians.


          Comrade, you completely lost the coast. It is private firms that buy light weapons and ammunition from us. And not only from us, but also from your friendly Serbia. If the Turks with one hand, as it were, stretch out their hands for icononomic cooperation, with the other they hold a knife to hammer it into your back. Is it the Bulgarians who shot down Russian planes and helicopters, and did they arrange a public execution for the Russian envoy in front of the camera? But is there no damage from Turkish Bayraktars for Russians in Syria, Libya and Ukraine?
          1. gsev
            gsev 26 June 2022 13: 59
            0
            Quote: Julian
            Comrade, you completely lost the coast.

            I objectively assess the level of cooperation between the states of Bulgaria, Turkey and Russia. Perhaps it’s nice to have a heart-to-heart talk with the Bulgarians about Russian-Bulgarian friendship, about the liberation of Bulgaria from the Turkish yoke, the Russians’ eternal dream to get rid of the Tatar raids from the Crimea, who drove millions of Russian, Ukrainian, Circassian, Polish, Moldavian and Wallachian people into Crimea and then sold into slavery. Polonyanok to all countries from Italy to Oman. However, I had to honestly and frankly listen to the stories of the secretary of Dzhokhar Dudayev, Ms. Aset, about how she collaborated with Anna Politkovskaya and directed the activities of this agent of influence of the Islamic gang underground. I had to speak frankly with the Pashtuns, whose three relatives worked in Hekmatyar's structures, about how many millions of dollars received from the United States Nemtsov distributed for subversive work against Russia and what were the losses of Russian and Soviet special forces in Afghanistan, Chechnya and Ukraine, according to the Afghan side. I had a chance to talk with a Circassian how his ancestral tribesmen went on a campaign together with Rededya of non-Russians and attacked Russian regiments on Shipka in a decisive attack, taking on all the ammunition of the Russian army and forcing the Russians to fight back not only with stones, but also dump the bodies of their dead comrades on Circassians climbing the slopes to the Eagle's Nest. I have to admit that the views of the Turks, Chechens, Afghans, Circassians and Finns with whom I met on historical and political events after 1938 are closer to mine than the views of the Bulgarians from this site. Moreover, in my opinion, even those who were subsequently taken out by US aircraft after the defeat of NATO in Afghanistan recognized the Russians' right to fight for their interests and were ready to fulfill the will of the United States only for disproportionately large gingerbread and expressed their readiness to sell US interests, for example, for a higher fee from Canadians or someone else. Bulgaria is still a loyal and staunch ally of the United States in their attempts to destroy and dismember Russia and turn the Russians into untermensch Europe ..
    3. stankow
      stankow 26 June 2022 01: 26
      0
      The West will crawl towards you. And you have no closer people. And you can't buy friends with gas.
  14. acetophenone
    acetophenone 25 June 2022 11: 22
    +1
    Peevski and Trifonov are handsome ... I immediately remembered the "fun 90s" ...
    1. Yulian
      Yulian 25 June 2022 12: 59
      +1
      Peevski and Trifonov are handsome ... I immediately remembered the "fun 90s" ...

      It is necessary to add Borysov, who for 12 years amused the Bulgarians as the General Secretary of the BKP, Todar Zhivkov, who ruled for 30 years, from whom he studied as a bodyguard after falling from power on November 10, 1989.
  15. Senior seaman
    Senior seaman 25 June 2022 12: 59
    +2
    And here Russia in the person of the ambassador

    Otherwise, you will have to admit your own inadequacy.
    In general, here our Bulgarian colleagues could enlighten, but they have rarely been seen lately.
    1. stankow
      stankow 26 June 2022 01: 30
      0
      And what are they to do here, some curses and an unfair attitude. Established stereotypes and distortion of history. Nobody listens to objections. Here we refrain.
      1. Aviator_
        Aviator_ 26 June 2022 08: 51
        0
        And what are they to do here, some curses and an unfair attitude. Established stereotypes and distortion of history. Nobody listens to objections.
        Let's object. We will listen. They themselves would give an analysis of these games - from the inside it would be more informative, not like from the outside.
      2. Senior seaman
        Senior seaman 26 June 2022 09: 29
        0
        Quote: stankow
        What are they to do here?

        Same as always.
        Here is an example of a very correct position.
        Quote: Bulgarint
        Keep in mind that "Vazdrazhdane" is a patriotic party that defends the interests of the country. Not pro-Russian and Russophile, but well understanding that if we keep good relations with Russia, we can get a lot of benefits, both in trade and in historical and cultural terms

        And I fully agree that such a pragmatic attitude would be beneficial to everyone, and especially Bulgaria.
        As for twisting history...
        Quote: stankow
        Hello! Can you give more details ? Zto when Bulgaria attacked Russia? When did you declare war?

        This is what strikes me personally. As of September 1915, the war has been going on for a whole year. The alignment of forces is clear to everyone (except the Ferdinand government). The fact that the plans of the Central Powers failed too. But no, we’ll fight a little with Serbia here, but we don’t want anything bad for anyone ... And when the Entente reacted in the appropriate way, there was a confused cry - why should we?
        But for the same!
  16. smaug78
    smaug78 25 June 2022 15: 33
    +1
    Nothing will happen...
  17. Bulgarint
    Bulgarint 25 June 2022 16: 15
    +1
    Keep in mind that "Vazdrazhdane" is a patriotic party that defends the interests of the country. Not pro-Russian and Russophile, but well aware that if we keep good relations with Russia, we can get a lot of benefits, both in trade and in historical and cultural terms.
  18. Cut Samshitov
    Cut Samshitov 25 June 2022 17: 37
    +1
    How much can you!? There is NOTHING "pro-Russian" in Bulgaria "Brothers* - Judas have always fought against Russia.
    1. stankow
      stankow 26 June 2022 01: 35
      -1
      Hello! Can you give more details ? Zto when Bulgaria attacked Russia? When did you declare war? When did Bulgarian aviation bomb Russian villages? Since you say "always", give me an example. At least one!
      1. Cut Samshitov
        Cut Samshitov 26 June 2022 22: 23
        0
        First and Second World Wars. Bulgaria is an ally of Germany. Enough examples?
  19. m_silenus
    m_silenus 25 June 2022 17: 46
    +2
    There will be no turning.
    Bulgaria has long lost its sovereignty and is under remote control from the US Embassy. And all sorts of NGOs in addition. The last government - some rootless. They grew up outside the Motherland and the concept of "Motherland" means nothing to them. Political parties such as "leading party", in simple terms - a gang with a leader.
    It is painful to see that in Russia people have ceased to distinguish the people from the ruling elite. And although after the Liberation the leaders always chose the side of the enemies of Russia, the overwhelming majority of the people were for Russia. Even now, although propaganda and distortion of history for 30 years have stirred up the heads of the younger generations.
    1. stankow
      stankow 26 June 2022 01: 36
      0
      Well, finally said - short and true!
  20. Captain45
    Captain45 25 June 2022 20: 40
    +2
    The first person Petkov accused was a certain Delyan Peevski. (C)
    Judging by the photo, this guy needs a raspberry jacket on his shoulders, and a gold chain around his neck and a typical brother from the 90s laughing
    1. Yulian
      Yulian 26 June 2022 11: 02
      +1
      Judging by the photo, this guy needs a raspberry jacket on his shoulders, and a gold chain around his neck and a typical brother from the 90s

      Oriented correctly. In the 90s, this guy, at the age of eighteen, was friends with the well-known Bulgarian mafiot Ilya Pavlov, who was shot during a mafia showdown and the guy swore allegiance to the Turkish DPS party. Such is the janicari.
      1. Captain45
        Captain45 27 June 2022 19: 51
        0
        Quote: Julian
        Oriented correctly. In the 90s, this guy, at the age of eighteen, was friends with the well-known Bulgarian mafiot Ilya Pavlov, who was shot during a mafia showdown and the guy swore allegiance to the Turkish DPS party. Such is the janicari.

        As the Russian proverb says: You cannot wash a black dog (male dog) white! laughing Well, it was not in vain that I worked as an opera, I immediately sketched an urku in the face laughing
  21. stankow
    stankow 26 June 2022 01: 16
    0
    Quote: Kayala
    Of course, there is truth in what you say. Bulgaria seems to be not our enemy (in words), but certainly not a friend. Excuse me, but all the actions of Bulgaria since its liberation from the Turkish yoke indicate that Bulgaria is not a friend to us, but it seems like an enemy, but not quite, but half, or rather half a bump. Something like this... request

    Do you know for sure "all the actions of Bulgaria since its liberation"? Yes, all in spite of Russia? Who whispered them to you :) Or just like that, "an established opinion"? :)
  22. Aist_M
    Aist_M 27 June 2022 10: 41
    -1
    Now I will translate this article into normal, Russian.
    In Bulgaria, pro-Russian politicians are getting rid of because they have not fulfilled their promises, and there is no more use for them.
    South Stream, in which Bulgaria has invested all its money, is "at the bottom"!
    Cruiser Moscow, a thunderstorm of the seas and oceans - "at the bottom"!
    Our Black Sea turned out to be not so ours.
    Tourists from Russia, who brought Bulgaria at least some kind of profit - in the Crimea.
    Trade turnover, trade, maritime communication - "at the bottom"!
    Against this background, the use of a ready-made gas transportation system for pumping American gas, Ukrainian refugees, for whom the European Union pays and the sale of all weapons donated by the USSR, is a very tempting prospect. And it's hard to refuse it.
    And the statement that now we will capture Romania and annex Bulgaria, against the background of the events in the Black Sea, sounds like "Mom, I pooped, help me take off my pants!"
    So tell me, what is real, modern Russia, can offer Bulgaria?
  23. Camrad
    Camrad 28 June 2022 22: 12
    0
    Quote from Aist_M

    So tell me, what is real, modern Russia, can offer Bulgaria?


    Russia can offer Bulgaria the most valuable thing that can be - namely, LIFE, both for the state as a whole and for its individual citizens. But, most likely, quick money for 155-mm shells for Ukraine, and other muddy things, as always, will outweigh everything else...
    1. Aist_M
      Aist_M 29 June 2022 18: 11
      0
      How is life in Mariupol?
  24. Kostadinov
    Kostadinov 30 June 2022 15: 17
    0
    This is a battle between two groups of "Euro-Atlantic" Russophobic oligarchs. Borisov on one side and Petkov on the other Peevski. The issue of Macedonia was used against Petkov. There is no merit of Mitrofanova here.