In Britain, they announced half-empty arsenals due to the ongoing supply of weapons to Ukraine

British arsenals are very poor due to supplies weapons to Ukraine, it will take several years for the military industry to fill them up again. This was stated by the head of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Britain, Tony Radakin.

The Lords Committee on Foreign Relations and Defense became concerned about the issue of the remaining weapons against the backdrop of the ongoing supply of weapons to Ukraine and called the head of the General Staff for a report, who brought to them the disappointing results of military assistance to Kyiv. According to Radakin, it will take years to replenish stocks of weapons.

Let's be honest, we're talking about years because it's really impossible to get a fast production on the click of a button when it comes to modern weaponry.

- he said.

Radakin stressed that Britain's arsenals were depleted due to large volumes of deliveries to Ukraine and the limited capacity of the British industry to produce its own weapons. Judging by his words, Boris Johnson will soon leave the UK without weapons in his quest to help Zelensky, as Britain is unable to meet all the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in weapons and ammunition against the backdrop of massive losses of weapons and the consumption of ammunition.

Meanwhile, the UK does not intend to stop the supply of "military aid" to Ukraine and declares the need to increase them. Moreover, such belligerent statements are made not only by Defense Secretary Ben Wallace, but by Foreign Minister Liz Truss and Prime Minister Boris Johnson. They demand from their allies to "stop Russia" and prevent the victory of the Russian army in Ukraine.

According to experts, Britain is becoming the unspoken leader of the European "party of war", advocating the continuation of the war in Ukraine to the last Ukrainian. London is ready to sacrifice the well-being of its citizens for this.

Comments

[Arkady007]

So now Ukraine will arm NATO?

[January]

For a lot of extra money and after NATO gives everything, what is left ...

[Shurik70]

- Why in Britain the queen only reigns, but does not rule?
- So that the British can say that they have honest people among the aristocracy

I think the warehouses were cleaned of junk first.
New equipment was transferred only in a few copies, check in real combat conditions
And as the junk ended, then talk began about empty warehouses

[avg]

As I saw the British armored car Saxon, I thought that they stole it in St. Petersburg, the one from which in 1917. Lenin spoke.

[tralmaster]

New technology is passed on to us through them to understand how to deal with it.

[aybolyt678]

Quote: Shurik70

And as the junk ended, then talk began about empty warehouses

On the one hand, this may be disinformation; politically, such a statement gives reason to raise the issue of financing the military industry, in any case, you should not rejoice ...

[MrTulandra]

I just saw how German PzH-2000 howitzers with black and white crosses on board fired at uncontrolled territories near Tishkovets. And it's June 22!

[tihonmarine]

Quote: Arkady007

So now Ukraine will arm NATO?

Since NATO has been arming them “to the fullest” since 2014, Ukraine sold off Soviet weapons, but does not have its own.

[tralflot1832]

This is what happens, they bought weapons from themselves and sent them to Ukraine. Ukraine's debts are their problems.

[Alex777]

It seems to me that apart from Johnson and his 3 fools, no one
in Britain it didn’t rest, so fight with us. Will hang on soon
the current ministers of all dogs will be kicked out. Wait and see.

[Negruz]

It seems to me that apart from Johnson and his 3 fools, no one
in Britain it didn’t rest, so fight with us. Will hang on soon
the current ministers of all dogs will be kicked out. Wait and see.

If it is documented that the SAS is quietly fighting in Ukraine and suffering losses, Boris will be "wrong" ....

[Alex777]

Sniper SAS armored personnel carrier APU "by mistake" unwound. Fact.

[Negruz]

While this is correspondence between unofficial persons, they will open it ....
We need either a body or docks ...

[Alex777]

Who needs when you need all the evidence
will find. It looks like the command has already been given to them.

[Negruz]

It would be nice .... It would be useful to trick Boriska with a face about a table in the British Parliament ...

[Alex777]

Lords are getting ready...)))

[Negruz]

Lords are getting ready...)))

[tralflot1832]

I have a suspicion that commentators are smarter on VO. A quiz What Where When the West loses miserably. A can for three months asks to cancel the fuel tax.

[Tusv]

Quote: tralflot1832

The can for three months asks to cancel the fuel tax. Stanochek will not blush.

Well, all sorts of Bloombergs write that before the special operation in America there was a real economic recovery. And the unemployment rate is only 3%. They tried so hard, but Vladimir Vladimirovich declared a tax named after himself to everyone. cab be. And so. I can assume that Mr. Trump blocked the Mexicans and immediately no one began to work. By the way, we had the same attempt in 2013

[Bolt cutter]

to nobody
in Britain it didn’t rest, so fight with us

So it is in general, but the Labor Party plans to open the borders, turning Britain into a refugee camp. Therefore, the Conservatives will remain in power for the foreseeable future.

[Alex777]

They will expel the "Boris gang", apologize to the GDP and let them live.

[Leshak]

In Britain, they announced half-empty arsenals due to the ongoing supply of weapons to Ukraine

Well if it's true. Lithuania is running up, a conflict with NATO is possible. And if this happens (God forbid), then empty arsenals in geyropa, small Britain and mattresses are very good.

[dmi.pris1]

The thing is that they have a lot of everything in storage from the 70-80s. And it’s quite suitable for war.

[Alex777]

Quote: dmi.pris

The thing is that they have a lot of stuff in storage from the 70s and 80s.

This is our store. And they, for the last
30 years, everything has long been disposed of.
And they didn’t have armies, even in the 70s.

[Normal]

In case of a possible conflict with Europe, they will use a fundamentally different weapon.

[GNM]

Britain got in touch with the beggars and went downhill.
Although, no, she just found a kindred spirit.

[Starover_Z]

The network gives a lot of copies to this photo. I give a signature to one:

Aus der Ausstellung „[SPACE] STREET. LIFE. PHOTOGRAPHY“ Deichtorhallen Hamburg/Haus der Photographie 8. Juni – 21. Oktober 2018

So abroad is also good, regardless of the sign LondonOn or HAMBURG!

[Emergency]

To produce, you need raw materials, and "oats bite now." Dollars are "losing face", so the owner's machine may not help.

[TermNachTer]

And not only in England. The only thing that is now saving Geyropa from major troubles is that no armed conflicts are expected. But life is a complicated thing))) not now, but tomorrow it is.

[Boycott]

In the UK, industry is in full swing. Its share in GDP is about 15-16%. About 80% are services, and these are not hairdressers, this is transportation insurance, for example. And yes, agriculture is another 0,5%. Even wonder what they will produce.

[Emergency]

And from what? Can the US military-industrial complex help?

[Boycott]

It will help, but not for free, of course. One of the goals of the Americans is to exterminate Europe as an industrial competitor.

[Bolt cutter]

Industry in the UK is in full swing

859000 cars are built per year, 4 out of 5 are for export. Every 5 minutes, a plane with Rolls Royce turbines takes off somewhere on the planet. Something like this.

[ultra]

In Russia, 1,5 million were produced and I am sure that every 5 minutes, somewhere in the world, a Russian-made helicopter takes off.

[Bolt cutter]

1,5 million produced

agree, the English ones will be better. (By the way, 1.6 million auto engines are built here a year)

Russian-made helicopter.

Not every 5 minutes, and more Soviet-made.
In general, there is little industry here .

[ultra]

I do not know of any public brand of English cars.

[Bolt cutter]

no public brand

Accessibility criteria vary from country to country .

[ultra]

Tell me the country where the Aston Martin is available to the majority of the population.

[Bolt cutter]

aston martin available.

And why do you not like the modest "Ewok" or jaguar XF? They are new, from 32 thousand pounds, which is approximately equal to the annual average salary, that is, it is quite affordable (even taking into account loans of 3%). A new Vauxhall can generally be taken for 18000. Something like this.

[ultra]

"Affordable" you call a car for which you have to lay out the average annual salary?

[Bolt cutter]

They buy it on credit, so yes, this price is quite acceptable. And what, do you want to buy a new car for change from a tobacconist?

[ultra]

You and I have different criteria for what a person can afford.

[Bolt cutter]

Do you want a new, modern car - a product of the fusion of hundreds of advanced technologies (from metallurgy to polymer chemistry and microelectronics) for a glass of port? It doesn't happen that way. And 200 pounds a week on a loan is a little expensive, but quite affordable. (7 packs of cigarettes-90 pounds).

[ultra]

I specially googled it. The average monthly salary in England is from 2200 to 2500 pounds, before taxes and mandatory contributions, which are from 35 to 40%, plus 800 pounds per month for a car, as you write. And what to live on after all this?

[Bolt cutter]

The average full-time salary in the UK fell 0.6% to £31,285 in 2021

On hand will be 2088 pounds per month. As a rule, two people work in a family. Medicine is free, food is often cheaper than in Russia. You can live. Of course, the new jaguar will make you give up some of the joys of life, but this is such a selyavi. In addition, it will not fall apart in three years - this is a purchase for a long time.

from 35 to 40%

20% and 12570 non-taxable minimum.

[ultra]

In Russia, industrial production is about 55% of GDP, in England about 18%. I think the industry in Russia is at least three times larger than in England, given that Russia's GDP is a third larger than English.

[Bolt cutter]

in Russia at least three times more than in England

Real per capita GDP in England is four and a half times higher than in Russia. The British share of global GDP is 1.79%, and the Russian one is 1.55%. At the same time, the population is more than half that.

[ultra]

I wonder how per capita GDP can be four times higher if real GDP in terms of PPP (the only one that more realistically reflects the size of the economy) is a third less? Your math is strange.

[Bolt cutter]

per capita GDP could be four times higher

Quite simply, the average Briton produces four times more goods than the average Russian.

GDP in PPP (the only

which makes it possible to shamelessly manipulate data.

[ultra]

But these are the arguments, so the arguments !!!

[Bolt cutter]

The standard of living is an argument? Or do you believe that here the people on the streets are dying of hunger, and in the houses everyone freezes in terrible British frosts of +2?

[ultra]

And what about the standard of living? I own two apartments and a house, I don’t have a car, I haven’t used it for five years. 99% of my friends have their own housing, the same number of people in the family have at least one car, we have free medicine, two acquaintances changed their hip joints for free. What is the standard of living in England higher than in Russia?

[Bolt cutter]

Yes, at least by the fact that you were sincerely surprised by the availability of the jaguar, and the VAZ is a French car for you.

[ultra]

"The British are very bad at buying Land Rover and Jaguar cars. If you look at the statistics of new car sales in the UK, there are only two Land Rover cars in the top 50 and there is not a single Jaguar. The British prefer cheaper and more practical cars." Writes a living person in England.

[Bolt cutter]

The British prefer cheaper

. But if desired, these cars are quite affordable for the average Englishman. Cars sell well around the world. Or is Lada-eggplant-sedan better?
Vauxhall and mini also sell well.

[ultra]

When was the last time you were in Russia?

[ultra]

And I never wrote anywhere that someone in England is starving. You are trying to prove to me, for some reason, that you have a "golden city on a hill" there.

[Bolt cutter]

you have a "golden city on a hill" there

I'm just trying to explain what's wrong here and terrible, as they write on VO. And it's too early to write off the British.

[ultra]

Well, not quite like that, you tried to portray some kind of industrial giant from the former shrunken empire, which it has not been for a long time. Like the United States, by the way. All industrial giants now live in Asia.

[Bolt cutter]

All industrial giants

Yes, not all. There is industry here, and a serious one. And they produce a lot of good and useful things. (The share in global GDP, which exceeds the Russian one, is proof of this).

[ultra]

GDP at PPP (according to the IMF for 2020) Russia-4,49 trillion. dollars 3,07% of the world. Great Britain-3,403 trillion dollars. 2.33% of the world.

[Bolt cutter]

in PPP

Count the huts in Mukholyubinsk in the same category as the cottages in Devonshire (both are housing, right?) And report the victory we can buy more for the same money . Only GDP can be considered a real indicator of the power of the economy without any cunning recalculations.

[ultra]

And how do you imagine it? Our production of a unit of a certain type of product costs 1 ruble, in England the same product costs 1 pound, we convert it into dollars and we get that the same product gave 1.5 dollars in UK GDP and 2 cents in Russia's GDP .This is, of course, figurative, but this is exactly how the gross domestic product is considered.

[Bolt cutter]

how do you imagine it?

Everything is converted into dollars at market prices and the surplus value created in the given territory is calculated. Something like this.

[ultra]

Are you delusional or is this your natural state?

[Bolt cutter]

Arguments are running out and the red flag doesn't help ?

[ultra]

So you didn’t have any arguments, the meaning of this discussion tends to zero.

[Bolt cutter]

and there were no arguments

I just have them - I see them from the window

[ultra]

Well then it's definitely "arguments".

[ultra]

And let's count the "huts" in Khanty-Mansiysk, Surgut or Belgorod with Voronezh and in your Devonshire.

[Bolt cutter]

Let's In addition to the Uzbeks, is someone eager to move there for permanent residence?

[ultra]

Where, in Belgorod or Voronezh? Or maybe in Krasnodar, Sochi or Pyatigorsk with Min. waters?

[nnm]

You are basically right. But there is a nuance in cars - the auto industry is already essentially not British for the most part.

[Bolt cutter]

the auto industry is no longer essentially British

If I find a three thousand carat diamond in the yard and I will buy a car factory in Britain, it will not become Latvian. How the French "Lada" did not become. In fact, the industry is here.

[ultra]

Quote: Bolt Cutter

How did not become French "Lada"

And what do you think Lada X Ray or Largus is?

[Bolt cutter]

Before French cars, they are far away. In its price category, however, a strong average.

[ultra]

both cars are built on the Renault platform, the share of imported components is up to 80%, these cars are certainly not Russian.

[Bolt cutter]

Compare with Renault of the French assembly for the EU market (my father-in-law has one)

[ultra]

The B0 platform on which the VAZ variants are built is not intended for the EU countries and it makes no sense to compare these cars.

[Boycott]

859000 cars are built per year, 

And this is almost 7% less than last year, less than in 1956. Progress is awesome. This degradation is called generally.

[Bolt cutter]

Export markets are in a fever. But there is an industry, and it produces good products - they don’t call it basins in slang . There are other things besides the auto industry.

[iouris]

No, you are lying! The arsenals of Her Majesty's democracy are inexhaustible!!

[Puzoter]

Lie. For the same purpose with which they lied, claiming that Russia would capture Ukraine in a week. They want to drag them into a war with Europe.

[agoran]

Gentlemen, a little off topic.
Here, for days, I watched a program on the pacification of violent women in England in the Middle Ages.
They were put in iron cages and dipped in cold water until they were subdued.
I hope you understand the analogy.

[Karabin]

Britain's arsenals have been severely impoverished due to the supply of weapons to Ukraine, it will take several years for the military industry to fill them up again.

And how does this threaten the once great Britain? Is someone going to attack her? Or is she going to announce CBO? If the Russian threat is meant, then it is unlikely that conventional means will play any role in a nuclear war. English weapons sent in the hands of some Russians kill other Russians. It is a fact. multiply outweighing in value the fact of reducing the arsenal, albeit by 50%.

Boris Johnson will soon leave the UK without weapons

That's because of this, all the fuss. Elections soon. It's time to change Borka. Another party will come with another prime minister, nothing will change. Weapons will be supplied. The economy is only a plus. Production growth.

London is ready to sacrifice the well-being of its citizens for this.

And how does this relate to the supply of weapons from warehouses?

[Vasyan1971]

The Lords Committee on Foreign Relations and Defense is preoccupied with the issue of the remaining weapons against the backdrop of the ongoing supply of weapons to Ukraine

Lords, sirs, peers, know the sense of proportion! © Do not dig a hole in Russia, you yourself will fall there!

[Tusv]

And here ischo wrote that the Britons sold their BAE Systems to Hans two years ago. And then there is the lack of energy. How are you so pompous and snobbish will rearm. And for what their funktiki, which are at risk of becoming candy wrappers. Are you again hoping for peace with Russia on your own terms? And usually the conditions are like this. You pay Us the loot, but We do not denigrate you. Yu andested mi?

[Zenn]

So it turns out that Zelensky, our little man, judging by the speed at which they are reducing their military reserves, and even their cash reserves have already begun to noticeably eat up.

[iouris]

Zelya can work on two rates. But this is not the limit.

[K_Valentin]

You look at this as "the USSR is reducing its stockpiles of weapons at an enormous rate" while the "friendly" West gets off with insignificant military spending.

[Mouse]

Stop Russia - Zelya replies - you know that this is impossible. Russia will capture the Ukraine and then together we will go to the west of Europe.. But why do we need London? Everyone understands that after a nuclear war, the survivors and the less affected will begin a new colonization of the world. Why then nuclear warheads?

[Rusticolus]

Those nuclear warheads that England has belong to it only formally. Without permission from the United States, they still cannot be used. And given the desire of the United States to ruffle Europe, England will never receive this permission. Even if it will be vitrified. Therefore, a nuclear attack on England will by no means lead to a nuclear war. No one will fit in for England, nor England itself will be able to answer at least something.

[K_Valentin]

Subtle British humor - it seems to be lying, but it seems not.

[riwas]

Britain's arsenals have been severely impoverished due to the supply of weapons to Ukraine, it will take several years for the military industry to fill them up again.

Military budgets will be substantially inflated, social programs will be cut, and the military-industrial complex will receive large profits.

[fif21]

Rubbish was piled on Ukraine, and snot was also dismissed. In little sick Boriska, the brain hormones are completely beaten off.

[Dart]

as always, lie ....

[rocket757]

In Britain, they announced half-empty arsenals due to the ongoing supply of weapons to Ukraine

So the military-industrial complex of those countries should rejoice, but there is hardly a reason for joy for a simple man in the street, a burgher and other TAX PAYERS!
Money will be printed, BUT, inflation and other related things, where will it go??? It's more likely to hit even harder.
So it will be with everyone who decided to participate in that "holiday go / Yo \ tizma"! the best prospects will be preserved by the one who jumps or crawls away in time!
Let's see who is the most cunning / cunning there.

[Mouse]

Quote: Rusticolus

Those nuclear warheads that England has belong to it only formally. Without permission from the United States, they still cannot be used. And given the desire of the United States to ruffle Europe, England will never receive this permission. Even if it will be vitrified. Therefore, a nuclear attack on England will by no means lead to a nuclear war. No one will fit in for England, nor England itself will be able to answer at least something.

If there was a nuclear disaster in the past, then history is silent about it. But it is obvious that the participants in a nuclear war will be excluded from the further game due to the bombings and third countries that have not been touched by nuclear bombings enter the arena of world ownership. A repeat of the past? Do not want.

[Mouse]

Quote: GNM

Britain got in touch with the beggars and went downhill.
Although, no, she just found a kindred spirit.

British pigs are just as good. But in Britain there is freedom of voice, there is a lot of things that we don’t dream of.

[Alexey-74]

They demand to stop Russia?! Require. do not demand - the result will be one, the victory of Russia.

[Electrical]

And the Brits are not afraid that they will then take them with their bare hands for a soft spot?

[APASUS]

How much rubbish was thrown into Ukraine. And now normal equipment and weapons have gone.
I wonder where she will float?