MiG-31 - a long story with a possible continuation

103

Probably the most unique aircraft in the world, the MiG-31, owes its appearance to the massive appearance of cruise missiles in the US arsenal. The regular interceptor of that time, the Tu-128, was not exactly obsolete, no, it was an aircraft that could serve (and eventually served until the 90s) for a long time, but, apparently, they wanted something that would make all the enemies shudder.

Actually it worked out. The head of many does not stop hurting from what was created by Mikoyan's designers in the 70s of the last century. And we would be happy to repeat, but here, something does not work out very well. And angular, huge, noisy (I appreciated it when four 31s flew to our airfield in March), the noticeable MiG-31 is still a cause of great concern for those whose soul it can fly to.



Given that there are no planes in the world that can get away from the 31st, there is something to worry about.

In the continuation of this material there will be many forecasts based on changes in the political situation in the world, but now we will make historical technical excursion. It's just the same way.

So, in the 60s, despite the presence of the loitering Tu-128 interceptor, it was decided to create a fundamentally new aircraft with a fundamentally new concept of application.


The Tu-128 was an aircraft that operated in close connection with the air defense system, focusing on working with ground-based radars. The new aircraft had to be able to operate outside the air defense radar system and was intended primarily for the protection of the Arctic borders, where the radar was very bad. The main enemy was American cruise missiles, which the new interceptor was supposed to detect and destroy at altitudes from 100 meters to 30 kilometers.

Plus, the new interceptor had to be incredibly fast. A speed of about 3500 km / h was expected, plus a fairly long flight time. However, reason prevailed and the creation of an engine capable of Mach 3 and having a sane appetite for proper flight duration was abandoned due to the realization that this was simply impossible. Therefore, the Soviet military was satisfied that the speed of the new aircraft would not be lower than that of the MiG-25. Which, we note, at that time was generally the fastest aircraft in the world, giving out about 3000 km / h (2,83M).


MiG-25

The MiG-31 was taken to design the MiG-25, but the MiG-31 is not a modification, it is a completely different machine, despite the existing external similarity. Inside there were a lot of differences, in the design of the power set, chassis, new D-30F engines with an afterburner, a new navigation system, sighting system, radar and a crew of two.

It is worth saying a few words about the engines. D-30F - it was a masterpiece performed by engine builders from Perm.


The basis was the regular D-30 engines of the Tu-134 aircraft, which the Permians were able to disperse from 6 kgf of thrust to 800 in afterburner. Since the engines consumed just a huge amount of air, the air intakes of the MiG-15 were much larger than those of the R500B-31 engines that were on the MiG-15.

Well, the most important component of the new interceptor is the SBI-16 Zaslon radar, the world's first phased array radar on a combat aircraft. Zaslon, created by the designers of the NPO Fazotron, was capable of tracking up to ten targets in the air and firing missiles with semi-active radar-guided seekers on four of them. Targets to kill were selected automatically, using the Argon-K on-board computer.

The sighting system made it possible to detect targets at a distance of up to 300 km, the range of automatic tracking was 120 km. PAR scanning angles +/-70 degrees in azimuth and from -60 to +70 degrees in elevation.

In addition, a chic feature of the MiG-31 was the ability to transmit information about detected targets to other aircraft or ground command posts of the air defense system using the RK-RDLN and APD-518 automated data transmission system. That is, the MiG-31 could be used as an AWACS aircraft

In addition, a search and tracking system with a heat direction finder was placed on the MiG-31, which was interfaced with the radar and could issue target designation to missiles with an IR seeker of the R-40TD and R-60 types from a distance of up to 50 km. The direction finder was located in a special compartment in the forward part of the fuselage and, when inoperative, was retracted into a special compartment.

Such a set of detection and guidance systems required a new weapons. Long-range R-33 missiles with a target range of up to 120 km have become a new weapon. Four of these missiles were suspended from the lower part of the fuselage in special recesses, plus four more missile suspension units were located under the wings.


That is, compared with the Tu-128 or MiG-25, the new aircraft carried exactly twice as much weapons. Plus, the MiG-31 was armed with a six-barreled gun GSH-6-23 with a caliber of 23 mm and with an ammunition load of 260 rounds, which was not the case with previous aircraft.

The navigation complex turned out to be very effective, but cumbersome and complex. It was necessary to take into account a lot of factors, as a result of which it became clear: INS, sighting and navigation system, short-range and long-range radio systems - all this requires more attention than a pilot could really pay.

One person could not effectively simultaneously pilot an aircraft, monitor the tactical situation, monitor the operation of aircraft systems and work with weapons. Therefore, the crew of the new interceptor consisted of two people - a pilot and a navigator-operator. Given the role assigned to the navigator-operator, for the MiG-31 it was quite fair to say that the pilot is just a delivery man to the navigator's place of work.

The pilot and navigator were placed in the cockpit in tandem one after the other on ejection seats K-36DM. The navigator-operator was really a very busy person. To help him cope with his duties:
- automatic control system SAU-155MP;
- navigation complex KN-25, consisting of two inertial systems IS-1-72A and a digital computer "Maneuver";
- short-range radio navigation system A-312 "Radical-NP";
- radio-technical system for long-range navigation A-723 "Kvitok-2";
- equipment of radio navigation systems "Tropic" and "Route";
- onboard automatic defense system, which included a passive jamming system and electronic warfare equipment.

MiG-31 - a long story with a possible continuation
MiG-31 pilot's workplace


The workplace of the navigator-operator of the MiG-31

The first prototype was taken into the air by test pilot A.V. Fedorov September 16, 1975. After a set of tests, a decision was made on mass production, which began in 1977.


Tests of the MiG-31 were difficult and not without losses. As a result of a flight accident, the “godfather” of the MiG-31 A.V. died. Fedotov and his navigator V.S. Zaitsev. But they were replaced by others who still made the plane fly. Menitsky, Orlov, Fastovets brought the test program to completion. The finale was the flight of the crew of Taskaev and Popov across the North Pole to Chukotka with aerial refueling.


At the end of the test program, the ability of the MiG-31 to repel an attack of multiple targets was tested. Ten target aircraft "attacked" Volgograd along a front 100 km wide. All targets were shot down by four MiG-31s.

In 1981, the MiG-31 with the Zaslon radar was put into service. The planes went to combat units, where the planned replacement of the Su-15 and Tu-128 with the MiG-31 began. Mostly those that covered the Arctic and the Far East.

The first combat mission of the new interceptors was the fight against the American high-altitude and very fast SR-71 reconnaissance aircraft.


The Blackbird was one of the fastest aircraft of that time (up to 3 km/h, 000 km/h in afterburner) with a working ceiling of up to 3 km.

The SR-71s acted in a very peculiar way: the aircraft approached the borders of the USSR without hiding, invading the airspace for several tens of kilometers. The Soviet air defense system came to a state of combat readiness, but simply did not have time to launch on the SR-71, the Blackbird went back.

On the other hand, the aircraft of the American electronic intelligence, which flew outside the Soviet airspace, calmly recorded the parameters of the radio-technical air defense systems of the USSR.

The MiG-31 became the main driver of the Blackbirds, especially in the skies over the Kola Peninsula, where representatives of many NATO countries generally flew. MiG-31s ​​in 1988 carried out 436 sorties to intercept planes staggering near the borders of the USSR, of which 86 sorties were on the SR-71.

The pilots of Kamchatka in the same year flew to intercept 825 times. "Orions", "Blackbirds", RS-135 - the MiG-31 has become a very difficult object for those who like to fly near the borders.


With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the role of the MiG-31 in the protection and defense of air borders has not changed at all. Considering that all the units in service with the MiG-31 were located on the territory of Russia, the number of aircraft in service with the new Russia has not changed at all. As the functions have not changed.

In 1994 and 1999, the MiG-31 was involved in the tasks of monitoring the air situation over Chechnya, performing the functions of an AWACS aircraft. In the 2000s, MiG-31s ​​were repeatedly involved in practicing interceptions of a mock enemy together with Su-30 fighters and A-50 AWACS aircraft.

"Walks" Tu-22MR and Tu-95, covered by the MiG-31 over the waters of the Sea of ​​Japan, near the borders of Japan very well excited Japanese society and kept in good shape.


In general, the MiG-31 proved to be a very efficient aircraft. But on the other hand, it was a very difficult aircraft to operate. From the very beginning, the MiG-31 was plagued by accidents and disasters. From the beginning of operation to 2000, 35 aviation incidents, of which 12 are catastrophes. According to the investigations, 19 were the fault of the pilots. 16 people died in the accidents.

Oddly enough, but the main causes of accidents were not the design flaws of the MiG-31, but frankly insufficient flight crews. The MiG-31 is very strict in control and does not tolerate abrupt evolutions with ores and a control stick. As practice has shown, pilots with an unacceptably small flight time of 30-40 hours PER YEAR got into accidents. It is clear that times of crisis, lack of everything and so on. But in the USSR, a fighter pilot flew 150-170 hours, and in the USA - about 200. The MiG-31, which was an order of magnitude more difficult to control than the MiG-29 or Su-27, did not forgive mistakes associated with a lack of piloting.

The improvements associated with the normalization of the situation in the Russian Air Force had a positive effect: from 2000 to the present time, only 31 flight accidents were recorded with the participation of the MiG-20, of which 3 ended in disasters. 5 people died.

In general, the trend is positive, since the aircraft still consumed the resource, however, there were few failures of the technical part. As before, pilots and difficult weather conditions were often to blame, but there were definitely fewer accidents and disasters.

The enemy highly appreciated the aircraft. Of course, a lot of eyes were watching the new interceptor, so the data gradually leaked to those who really needed it. American experts openly called the MiG-31 "the main intimidating force of the USSR." Fair.

They tried to offer the aircraft for export. The MiG-31 model was shown at an exhibition in Manila in 1990, and the foreign public saw the aircraft in its natural form in 1991 at the Le Bourget air show.

Of course, after the demonstrations of the MiG-29 and Su-27 at Le Bourget in 1990, when the great Viktor Pugachev simply killed all the spectators with his "cobra" on the Su-27, the MiG-31 did not cause such a stir. Well, a couple of passes, a little aerobatics ... The audience did not appreciate it.

But the professionals were shocked. Wow, those Russians did it again!


Considering that our aircraft was exhibited with the fairing removed, demonstrating to everyone the “Barrier” radar with HEADLIGHTS, there was something to be stunned by. Plus the six-barreled gun GSh-6-23, the existence of which, to put it mildly, was doubted in the West. And the “Russian Phoenixes”, the R-33 miracle missiles, were also seen by Western experts not in mock-ups.

Of course, it was necessary to criticize. Specialized magazines were filled with opinions about the fact that the aircraft was painted like a tractor, and the quality of welding leaves much to be desired, and so on. And they simply did not believe in a phased antenna array.

But real experts made their correct conclusions: the MiG-31, despite the external similarity with the MiG-25, is a completely different aircraft. A very powerful interceptor and fighter, which, thanks to its detection systems and engines, is capable of catching up and destroying any combat aircraft at any altitude. And there is no point in comparing the MiG-31 with any other new generation fighter. No need to look for aerodynamic delights or stealth technology. They are not here. The MiG-31 is just an executioner, brutal and efficient.


And indeed, why stealth aircraft, from which you can not get away? Why aerodynamic tricks, if the engines accelerate the car to breathtaking speeds?

But it was not possible to sell the MiG-31 to someone abroad. Shows at air shows, let's say, were overly optimistic. Who could buy from among the non-friends, the plane would not be sold to him. And to whom it would be possible to sell, those were scared away by the complexity of the machine.

Well, you must admit, which of Libya and Syria are the MiG-31 operators? They are with the 21st and 23rd barely a soul in the body ...

So the only country that bought the MiG-31 was China. But we will talk about this in the next article, because the 24 aircraft acquired by the PLA Air Force can play a very interesting role in the future.

A total of 519 MiG-31 interceptors were built. Of these, about 250 vehicles have survived to this day, of which 143 are in active operation, the rest are either in reserve or under modernization.

LTX MiG-31

Wingspan, m: 13,46
Aircraft Length, m: 22,69
The height of the aircraft, m: 5,15
Wing area, м2: 61,60

Weight, kg:
- empty aircraft: 21 820
- normal takeoff: 41 000
- maximum take-off: 46 200

Engine type: 2 x TRDDF D-30F-6 x 15200 kN with afterburner

Maximum speed km / h:
- at an altitude of 17 m: 500 (3M)
- at an altitude of 3 m: 000

Practical range, km:
- without PTB: 2 150
- with PTB: 3 300

Combat range, km
- when flying to at supersonic speed: 720
- when flying at subsonic speed: 1
- when flying at subsonic speed with PTB: 1
- when flying at a speed of 1M and with one refueling: 2

Duration of barrage, h
- with refueling in the air: 6
- without refueling: 3,5

Practical ceiling, m: 20 600

Crew, prs: 2

Armament:
- one 23-mm cannon GSh-6-23M (no 260 shells)
- 4 UR long range R-33
- 2 medium-range missiles R-40T and
- 4 short-range missiles R-60, R-60M


The MiG-31 is equipped with a six-barreled 23-mm automatic gun GSh-6-23M with 260 rounds of ammunition. The rate of fire of the gun is 6000 rounds / min.

Four R-33 long-range missiles are placed in a semi-recessed position on AKU-410 launchers mounted on the lower surface of the middle part of the fuselage. The mass of the rocket is 480 kg, the mass of the warhead is 47 kg, the firing range is 120 km.

Four underwing pylons provide for the suspension of R-40 missiles with radar or thermal homing heads. In the case of the suspension of R-40 missiles, the number of R-33 missiles on the ventral hardpoints is reduced to three, because it is necessary to install a container with missile guidance equipment in one place.

On the outer pylons, it is possible to suspend four URs (two on each) of the short-range R-60.

MiG-31B



The first modification of the aircraft was due to the fact that the interceptor, which was entrusted with the duties of a heavy fighter for long-range escort of strategic bombers, needed to add range.

The aircraft was equipped with a retractable filling rod and all the necessary equipment, including for long-distance flights.

On July 30, 1987, test pilot Roman Taskaev and test navigator Leonid Popov flew a MiG-31 over the North Pole along the route Monchegorsk - North Pole - Anadyr (Chukotka). Two mid-air refuelings and a flight in an area with difficult navigational conditions showed the excellent capabilities of the MiG-31B for long-distance flights. The flight lasted 6 hours and 26 minutes.

Of course, this was practically an experimental flight, since it would be imprudent to chain the pilots to their chairs for 6 hours purely physiologically and expect them to accurately fulfill the assigned tasks. But since 1990, all MiG-31s ​​have been equipped with filling stations at the factory.


In addition, the weapons were seriously improved. The impetus for this was given by the story of Adolf Tolkachev, who worked for Western intelligence services and passed on secret information about the MiG-29 and MiG-31 weapons systems. Tolkachev handed over 54 secret developments in the field of electronic equipment of Soviet aircraft to the CIA, for which he was sentenced to death after exposure. It is believed that the damage from Tolkachev's actions was more serious than from Belenko, who stole a MiG-25 to Japan.

All this forced the MiG-31 to be equipped with a new weapon system. As a result, the MiG-31B appeared with more powerful D-30F-6 engines, an upgraded radar, a Zaslon-A weapons control system, improved on-board electronics and electronic warfare equipment.

The missile armament was supplemented by R-40TD medium-range missiles and R-60 short-range missiles.

Naturally, after Tolkachev's betrayal, all previously released MiG-31 models were upgraded to the level of the MiG-31B.

MiG-31BM



This aircraft made its first flight in 1999. It was a modernization of the interceptor into a multi-purpose aircraft. MiG-31BM received a new weapon control system "Barrier-M", which allowed the use of high-precision weapons. Due to the modernization of on-board radio electronics and new weapon systems, the efficiency of the MiG-31 compared to the MiG-31 has increased by two and a half times.

The detection range of air targets has been increased to 320 km, and the range of their destruction - up to 280 km. This is a very serious indicator. For comparison, the American F-14D Tomcat interceptor is capable of hitting air targets at a distance of no more than 180 km.

R-33S or R-37 missiles were placed in the ventral nodes, in addition, the MiG-31BM was armed with the most advanced medium-range missile RVV-AE (4 pcs). They left the old, but proven R-40TD.


In addition, the range of weapons was expanded with Kh-31P, Kh-25MP or Kh-25MPU anti-radar missiles (up to six units), X-31A anti-ship missiles (up to six), Kh-59 air-to-surface missiles and Kh-29T (up to three) or Kh-59M (up to two units), up to six KAB-1500 corrected air bombs or up to eight KAB-500 with television or laser guidance. The maximum payload weight is 9000 kg. Compared to 3000 kg and the MiG-31 - more than luxurious.

It is believed that the MiG-31BM is the only serial fighter in the world capable of intercepting and destroying cruise missiles with an efficiency of more than 90%.

It is planned to upgrade to the MiG-31BM level all the MiG-31 family aircraft in service and in reserve, with the exception of the MiG-31K.


LTH MiG-31BM

Wingspan, m: 13,46
Length, m: 22,67
Height, m: 6,10
Wing area, м2: 61,60

Weight, kg
- empty aircraft: 21 825
- normal takeoff: 42 400
- maximum take-off: 48 200

Engine type: 2 x D30F-6M with unforced thrust x 16500 kN

Maximum speed km / h
- at a height: 3 (000M)
- near the ground: 1 500

Practical range, km
- with PTB: 3 300
- without PTB: 2 500

Combat range, km
- without PTB at a speed of 1M: 720
- with PTB at a speed of 1M: 1
- with PTB with a speed of 1M: 1
- with one refueling at a speed of 1M: 2
Practical ceiling, m: 20 000

Crew, prs: 2

Armament:
- one 23-mm six-barreled gun GSh-6-23 (260 rounds) combat load - 9000 kg
- up to 6 long-range missiles R-33S or R-37,
- up to 4 medium-range missiles R-77 or RVV-AE,
- 2 UR R-40TD,
- 3 UR "air-to-surface" X-59 and X-29T or 2 X-59M
- 6 anti-ship missiles X-31A
- up to 6 anti-radar UR Kh-31P, Kh-25MP or Kh-25MPU
- up to 6 corrected air bombs KAB-1500 or up to 8 KAB-500 with television or laser guidance

MiG-31BSM



Modernization, which includes a new SUV, radar and upgraded on-board computer. This set of upgrades allows you to detect targets at a distance of up to 320 km, track up to 10 targets and fire at 6 targets at a distance of up to 280 km.

Changes are available in the cockpit. Multifunctional displays appeared, and a periscope and rear-view mirrors were installed in the cockpit to view the rear hemisphere.



The navigator received three displays to display tactical, navigational and radar information.

The boom and refueling equipment are missing.

MiG-31K



The latest upgrade of the MiG-31. This is a complex for the use of hypersonic aeroballistic missiles "Dagger".

The fighter received new on-board equipment, an increased fuel supply, and special communications equipment.

The X-47M2 "Dagger" missile has a significant weight (about 4 tons), which led to a shift in the center of gravity of the aircraft and required a special training program for pilots to take off with a suspended missile.

With the advent of the Kinzhal, the MiG-31K was retrained as a heavy strike aircraft, which actually serves as the first stage of the missile.

The MiG-31K lifts the Kh-47M2 to a height of about 25 km and accelerates it to a speed of 3 km/h. Further, the control system helps the crew to bring the aircraft to the optimal flight mode in terms of speed and altitude, and launches. After that, the loss of mass and the change in the center of gravity of the aircraft are compensated.


The flight performance of the MiG-31K has not changed compared to the MiG-31BM, with the exception of a set of weapons. When using the Kh-47M2, the suspension of other missiles becomes impossible, so the entire set of weapons of the MiG-31K consists of the GSh-23-6 gun and the Kh-47M2 missile.

For forty-five years this unsurpassed aircraft has been guarding the borders of our country. Quite a bit before the present anniversary. Strict and complex, but very effective and deadly, the aircraft has every chance to celebrate half a century of service with honor. Few aircraft can boast such a service life, especially the front line aircraft.

But we will talk about the prospects for the MiG-31 and RSK MiG in the next article. And the second part will be no less interesting, and perhaps even more so. After all, we are talking not so much about the future prospects for the development of an elderly aircraft, but about the survival and rescue of the "RSK MiG" thanks to the MiG-31.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

103 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -5
    15 June 2022 04: 28
    Which, we note, at that time was generally the fastest aircraft in the world, giving out about 3000 km / h
    The fastest combat serial aircraft, however Blackbird is mentioned.
    MiG-31, which was an order of magnitude more difficult,
    By an order of magnitude, this is 10 times, but if in the binary system, then of course! laughing
    1. +13
      15 June 2022 06: 53
      other things Blackbird - not a combat aircraft - but just a camera delivery man - has no weapons
      1. +11
        15 June 2022 07: 23
        Good review, excellent Soviet aircraft.
        1. +5
          15 June 2022 08: 55
          I join! I enjoyed reading it, thanks to Roman good
      2. 0
        15 June 2022 08: 07
        Quote: Lepsik
        other things Blackbird - not a combat aircraft - but just a camera delivery man - has no weapons

        That is why it is simply the fastest production aircraft.
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. 0
        16 June 2022 21: 23
        There was also a Lockheed YF-12 interceptor project with 4 missiles. But the project was cancelled.
  2. +6
    15 June 2022 04: 39
    Good, good review.
    1. 0
      16 June 2022 13: 28
      I agree, a well-researched analytical review, thanks to Skomorokhov.
  3. Eug
    +15
    15 June 2022 04: 49
    Please change the caption under the second "from the top" photo or the photo itself - it clearly shows the MiG-31 (see two-wheeled tandem chassis), and the caption - the MiG-25 ...
    1. Eug
      +2
      15 June 2022 05: 56
      I made a mistake - of course, under the THIRD "from above" photo ...
    2. +1
      15 June 2022 09: 21
      Agree, obvious blunder lol
    3. +3
      15 June 2022 18: 37
      and the signature is MiG-25 ...

      Of course a bug. As well as the history of the appearance of the MiG-31. Oddly enough, it appeared because no one needed stratospheric supersonic interception. Neither their "Valkyrie" nor our "weave" went. And the MiG-25 was left without work. And it was a pity to throw out such a platform. Here they are blind. For loitering, the range is short for our northern expanses from airfield to airfield, a full-fledged replacement for the Tu-128 did not come out. And for front-line depth it will do, and there the Su-27 would have pulled, and it wasn’t really “born” either. Well, they blinded and blinded, not to throw out a decent glider. Now they're zababakhali under the Dagger.
      He has one plus - he was very good for the late 70s. After all, there was simply nowhere to put such a fool as "Barrier" into another glider.
  4. -12
    15 June 2022 05: 00
    The MiG-31 was an excellent interceptor for its time. Today, an aircraft with such a monstrous EPR is outright archaism, it does not pose any threat to 4+ aircraft, not to mention generation 5. The only task that it can effectively perform is to be the carrier of the Dagger.
    Creating a new interceptor will not pull our budget, and there is no one to do it, most of the developers are gone. The last to be destroyed was the radar developer of this aircraft, NPO Fazatron, its building was demolished in 2020, and the team was disbanded.
    1. +3
      15 June 2022 05: 40
      Quote: ramzay21
      Today, an aircraft with such a monstrous EPR is outright archaism, it does not pose any threat to 4+ aircraft, not to mention generation 5.

      Hand face! But nothing against the Kyrgyz Republic, will it go?
    2. +10
      15 June 2022 06: 16
      it poses no threat to 4+ aircraft, let alone 5 generation

      Even as it imagines, while its means of detection and "long arm" are superior to those of the enemy .. Actually, this is exactly what it was intended for, and by no means for close maneuverable combat. You are comparing the incomparable, battlefield superiority aircraft, percussion apparatus and pure interceptor. They all have completely different tasks. And in its class - the MiG-31 is almost perfect .. Which of course does not eliminate the need for its further upgrades. Otherwise, the possibilities of a long-range defeat may even be equal, but here - he really will have a hard time ..
      1. -6
        15 June 2022 06: 51
        The enemy has AWACS.
        And the latest stealth fighters F-22, F-35, "Rafale".
        1. +3
          15 June 2022 21: 55
          MiG-31 could be used as an AWACS aircraft
          1. +2
            15 June 2022 22: 24
            What for? The size and speed of the MiG-31 will never fit the equipment that will fit into a normal AWACS aircraft and it will never be able to stay in the air for so long. So why reinvent the wheel? While the MiG-31s ​​were flying, it was necessary to make AWACS aircraft based on the idle Tu-204s and not to design the expensive A-100 prodigy
          2. -2
            16 June 2022 04: 18
            Nobody in the world does this, they build AWACS based on large aircraft.
            And the MiG-31 is also becoming obsolete, the youngest are over 30 years old.
      2. +5
        15 June 2022 11: 08
        Quote: paul3390
        And in its class - the MiG-31 is almost perfect ..

        Almost perfect was the MiG-31M, developed by the engineers of the Gorky aircraft plant under the direction of Mindrov. The plane took off in the 85th, and presented it to the country's leadership in the 92nd. But who needed him at that time ...
        But it was literally a breakthrough. He shot down the target at a distance of 300 km.! He took on board 6 missiles BD and 4 SD, Zaslon-M provided a detection range of up to 320 km., Maintaining 24 targets and simultaneously attacking 6 of them ...
      3. 0
        15 June 2022 19: 20
        Even as it represents, as long as its means of detection and "long arm" are superior to those of the enemy.

        How can the Zaslon radar, created in the 70s and using the technologies of the 70s, outperform the radar created in the 2000s? It's like comparing a Rubin tube TV with an LG LED TV.
        The MiG-31 will be able to detect the F-35 at a distance of no more than 30 km, and the F-35 will detect the MiG-31 with the radar turned on at a distance of 300 km in passive mode, the F-35 pilot will approach our MiG by 100 km, launch the AIM-120 and leave without approaching the MiG-31 for less than 30 km. And our pilot will not even understand what happened.
        They will say on TV that the plane ignited spontaneously and our urya-patriots with pots on their heads will shout that there is no evidence that the F-35 shot him down. Everything is absolutely the same as with RRC Moscow. Those who are friends with their heads understand that two missiles hit the cruiser, one of which did not explode, and the patriots believe that the cruiser spontaneously ignited.
        1. +3
          15 June 2022 22: 49
          The MiG-31 will be able to detect the F-35 at a distance of no more than 30 km,

          Canceled the basic radar equation by the decision of the All-Union Central Council of Trade Unions? wink Even a tenfold reduction in RCS (from 3 sq.m to 30 sq.cm, although this is an unthinkable figure) will only reduce the range by 1,78 times. If it was 180 km, it will become 100 km.
    3. -19
      15 June 2022 06: 57
      We had to build a single fighter for the Air Force and the Navy, like the Rafal.
      And do not produce derivatives of the Su-27, MiG-29, and Su-57 with a direct air intake, a round nozzle and incomprehensible radio electronics.
    4. +7
      15 June 2022 11: 24
      Quote: ramzay21
      The MiG-31 was an excellent interceptor for its time. Today, an aircraft with such a monstrous EPR is outright archaism, it does not pose any threat to 4+ aircraft, not to mention generation 5. The only task that it can effectively perform is to be the carrier of the Dagger.

      You just don't understand the essence of the Wasteland destination MiG-31. smile
      This is not MFI. This is an interceptor. Flying air defense missile system DD complete with OVC radar. Its goals are the CD and their carriers, moreover, in the theater of operations, where it is extremely difficult to meet enemy fighters. Or other low-maneuverable targets, because any RVV DD is a heavy thing, and it is difficult to hit a maneuvering target with it.
      1. +2
        15 June 2022 20: 46
        You simply do not understand the purpose of the MiG-31.

        I understand, but firstly, they often fly out to intercept aircraft, and then they have to meet with the F-22 and F-35, and secondly, it is almost impossible to detect the KR, and even made using the latest technologies, flying over the tundra with that number of aircraft.
        If we talk about an aircraft designed to detect and intercept missiles, then it would be cheaper and more reliable to build an adequate number of AWACS aircraft based on the Tu-204, arming them with explosive missiles, it will have a greater detection range of any targets, this is physics, it can be in the air much longer and it will be cheaper to operate them, there is no need to drive the IL-78 to refuel so often.
        1. +1
          16 June 2022 08: 12
          He could be - and AWACS, and PRLO, and a tanker, and a missile carrier - VV, VP.
          Dassault with his "Falcon" - the version of the missile carrier was clearly worked out, even on the official website it was, but now it has been removed).
          1. +1
            17 June 2022 01: 57
            To patrol our Arctic coasts, an AWACS aircraft with long-range explosive missiles against cruise missiles is what you need. But you are right, they didn’t make anything out of it, you can cut too little on it, but respected people from the Moscow Region and the military-industrial complex don’t want to deal with small things, and don’t want to until they start putting them up against the wall.
            1. 0
              18 June 2022 15: 20
              And like missile carriers with air-to-surface missiles.
    5. +2
      15 June 2022 18: 39
      Today, an aircraft with such a monstrous EPR is outright archaism,
      Why? Why does he need an EPR at the level of a "soccer ball"? Yes, he "shines" with his radar station much further than he will be detected as a letak.
      Yes, and the main goals for him are not the F-16 (continue the list yourself), but "a little" heavier.
    6. 0
      15 June 2022 21: 35
      Quote: ramzay21
      NPO Fazatron, its building was demolished in 2020, and the team was disbanded.

      Did Stoloto buy them?
      1. 0
        18 June 2022 19: 13
        Did Stoloto buy them?

        Established at the end of 2019, Ice Development LLC. Good people will build residential complexes, earn money, you don’t need modern radars.
    7. +1
      15 June 2022 22: 28
      The last to be destroyed was the radar developer of this aircraft, NPO Fazatron, its building was demolished in 2020, and the team was disbanded.
      The developer of "Zaslon" is alive, well and prospering, but NPO FAZATRON had nothing to do with the development process, and this Soviet NGO ceased to exist much earlier than the year 2020 you specified!
      1. 0
        18 June 2022 19: 10
        The developer of "Barrier" is alive, healthy and prosperous, and NPO FAZATRON had nothing to do with the development process

        Yes, I confused it with the MiG-35, their first domestic radar AFAR Zhuk AE developed the Phazatron, and the Crossbow for the Ka-52, so it’s not a big loss.
        this Soviet NGO ceased to exist much earlier than the year 2020 you indicated!

        These buildings were demolished in 2020 and the employees were kicked out a long time ago, in 2018. It’s just that good people needed their site, but our country doesn’t need modern manufacturers and developers of radars, if we buy something somewhere. Right?
        1. +1
          18 June 2022 23: 37
          Are you asking right? Yes, who knows, the loss of work by people is not good, but this current association, which is to some extent the successor to that Soviet NGO, in my opinion, inherited all the worst that was in it, and the reasons for the collapse of the Soviet NGO must be sought at the beginning 80s, therefore, as well as about the dead, it’s better not to say anything.
          1. -1
            19 June 2022 00: 17
            My question was whether our country needed inexpensive and modern radars or not. Your answer, as I understand it, is not needed.
            The unique specialists of this enterprise will not disappear, the old people will retire, the rest can follow in the footsteps of the specialists we do not need in rocket science and the construction of aircraft carriers, they are now working a lot in China and India and in the USA and for much more money.
            As for the Phazatron itself, this unique enterprise in the early 80s did things that all over the world were able to do only in the USA and France, this enterprise managed not only to survive under Yeltsin, but also to develop the Crossbow for the Ka-52 as well as to develop avionics with AFAR for the MiG-29 before they developed avionics with AFAR for the Su-35.
            1. +1
              19 June 2022 07: 58
              You wanted a direct answer, well, you will get it, in the place that you sold, there is the so-called NIIR, which, by and large, has not created anything unique and serial for a long time! The radar of the original MiG-29 was a failure, the unification with the Su-27, which was not based on them, saved the afar Zhuk - on paper and bloggers give a damn, but from the "tests" in India the answer is, the real characteristics are worse than those declared, where the troops have over-bushed Helicopter radars - no, the MiG-35 with a slot antenna, although for a long time there has been an option for it with headlights, but not from a kosher developer. Yes, and there is no AFAR for the Su-35, only during the operation we see a completely different developer on the radar fighters, so it turns out like in the old saying, someone works for us, and someone for TASS and a toilet ...
    8. 0
      16 June 2022 20: 48
      And for the destroyer of a specific target in the area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbtheir air defense in the shortest possible time, EPR is not a hindrance
  5. +3
    15 June 2022 05: 08
    In the third photo, you still have a MIG-31, as evidenced by the suspended R-33s.
    1. 0
      15 June 2022 09: 24
      Just a quick glance says it all: chassis, root bead, etc.
    2. +1
      16 June 2022 00: 04
      Not only. The two-wheeled side landing gear is also a sign of the 31st
  6. +12
    15 June 2022 05: 24
    It was an interesting time when our Motherland - the USSR, was able to make world-class objects of almost any complexity exclusively on its own .. And they tell us - like a dark scoop, galoshes there, curse the Bolsheviks, other nonsense ..
    1. +8
      15 June 2022 06: 15
      Quote: paul3390
      And they tell us - like a dark scoop, galoshes there, the Bolsheviks curse, other nonsense ..

      And who says that? They say so because they themselves do not create anything. And if they did something, then again on the basis of Soviet developments, which had already been done earlier, in the late 80s, but troubled times followed. Recently they wanted to resume production of the MiG-31, but could not. Lost technology and skills. Because now effective managers are held in high esteem, like Serdyukov or Slyusar - the producer of the singer Glucose or someone's sons.
      1. +5
        15 June 2022 06: 19
        The people say correctly - we live on the ruins of an ancient high-tech civilization that possessed non-reproducible possibilities .. USSR .. That was a time when the gods still lived on earth .. Judging by their epic deeds .. The Soviet people. And we, the descendants of these gods, should be extremely ashamed and piercingly offended for our total degradation in all respects ..
        1. +6
          15 June 2022 06: 47
          I disagree about degradation. If our Soviet civilization was so wonderful, then why did it disappear? The enemies did their best, this is certainly true, but we had such protection from them! How did they succeed? Simple: they exploited the flaws in our system. The main one is ignorance of the measure. What's the use of ultra-fast fighters if there are no sausages in the stores, and there are queues before fights for imported clothes. With these clothes, the enemies defeated the USSR. Belenko, who hijacked the MiG-25 to Japan, brought to our enemies not only a plane, but also extremely important information about the USSR - it’s BAD WITH SAUSAGE there! Enemies understood the weak point of the USSR, and then it was a matter of technology. Knowing that we and our fighter jets have been buying bread in the US and Canada for petrodollars for a long time, and by manipulating oil prices, they lowered our incomes, and after them the standard of living in the USSR, below the plinth, and managed to bring it down. This is what should not happen again. You need to know the measure and avoid distortions. We need a reasonable balance between fighters and sausage.
          1. +7
            15 June 2022 06: 54
            Even the gods are not perfect .. But it did not - for a simple reason. Well, who could have expected that we would be betrayed and sold by our own leaders? Starting with the crunch. For nothing but outright wrecking can be called his actions. I think it was then that part of our then elite, the enemies of the people who were not finished off by Comrade Stalin, set a course for the dismantling of the USSR and socialism in exchange for Western goodies.

            Iosif Vissarionovich was not in vain, oh, how not in vain he postulated that as we move towards communism, the class struggle would only intensify .. He knew what he was talking about .. Only who would have listened to him ..
            1. -6
              15 June 2022 07: 20
              And if so, then why the hell is he needed then, communism? After all, the stronger the "class struggle" is, the worse will be the life of people. But communism seems to have been invented for this, so that people's lives become better! And then an insurmountable contradiction arises: in order to improve life sometime in the future, it must be sharply worsened now, in the present, as a result of the "class struggle." And we found ourselves in a vicious circle: we were fighting for a brighter future, while the present was getting worse. Thus, communism was completely discredited, and the USSR was doomed. And a series of funerals of Soviet leaders (with television broadcasts!) were harbingers of this.
              1. +1
                15 June 2022 09: 14
                Sell ​​your homeland for sausage ....

                Not even for a barrel of jam, and a basket of cookies.

                He made a bad bargain.
                1. -2
                  15 June 2022 10: 22
                  Alas, the spiritual cannot exist for a long time without the material.
                2. +1
                  15 June 2022 11: 37
                  Quote: Maxim G
                  Sell ​​your homeland for sausage ....
                  Not even for a barrel of jam, and a basket of cookies.
                  He made a bad bargain.

                  So you can't go against the basic needs. You can’t feed the people for 70 years with promises that life will be better, life will be more fun - you just pull up again. Pulled up. And more than once. And they got meat by registration and sausage in Moscow.
                  Well, people do not add up in the minds of speeches about the advantages of the socialist system and sausage trains. Especially when these inspiring speeches are delivered by people who shop in special distributors.
                  The people and the party are one - only the shops are separated. ©
            2. +2
              15 June 2022 08: 38
              “For nothing but outright sabotage - his actions cannot be called” - are our successes in space - sabotage? Is the creation of a nuclear missile shield wrecking? Is the resettlement of barracks and communal apartments wrecking? In this case, I am for such sabotage.
              1. +4
                15 June 2022 10: 27
                And this is exactly what was created and invented under Khrushchev? And not before him under Stalin, and Khrushchev was only lucky to live? The atomic bomb - under Stalin. Jet aviation - under Stalin. The entire scientific and technical base for a breakthrough into space - under Stalin! He simply did not live to see the first satellite and Gagarin.
                1. +3
                  15 June 2022 11: 39
                  Quote: Pavel73
                  And this is exactly what was created and invented under Khrushchev? And not before him under Stalin, and Khrushchev was only lucky to live?

                  You are stepping on thin ice, comrade. For with such logic, both GOELRO and industrialization turn out to be the merits of Nicholas II - he just didn't make it. wink
              2. 0
                15 June 2022 11: 18
                Yes, Khrushchev at least began to think a little about Soviet citizens and their comfort, it’s bad that he was a tyrant.
                1. -4
                  15 June 2022 13: 25
                  He was not a petty tyrant, it was the Soviet press that represented him as such after his removal. He very worthily got out of the Caribbean crisis, and with the benefit of the USSR, but his predecessor would most likely get involved in the war. It's just that Khrushchev was a typical Stalinist party worker, not the best and not the worst, there were no others, as they say, in the country.
          2. 0
            4 August 2022 21: 06
            I completely agree with you. The type of socialism that was in the USSR really reached a dead end. No luck with the reformers, but now, when capitalism has "swallowed" these reforms do not seem so complicated at first glance. All that was needed was to curtail the appetite of the military-industrial complex, which was frankly snickering, and cultivate private initiative and competition in the field of consumer goods. But history does not have subjunctive moods, but it has established traditions - reforms in Russia are carried out through blood and war.
      2. +1
        15 June 2022 11: 55
        Recently they wanted to resume production of the MiG-31, but could not. Lost technology and skills.

        I think that's not the point. The technology for creating the Tu-160 was revived and even improved, the production of the series began. It can hardly be said that the problem with the MIG-31 is more complicated.
        Most likely, they did not resume production simply because there is a supply of non-storage. Plus, not all flying ones have yet been modernized. And if the rumors about the creation of a new long-range interception complex are true, then in general the resumption of the 31 series does not make sense. Although, the platform is not a bad upgrade.
        1. -4
          15 June 2022 12: 06
          Quote: Wedmak
          The technology for creating the Tu-160 was revived and even improved, the production of a series began

          Tu-160 is not made from scratch now. There was a supply of gliders that were in storage. The filling is new, but the shell is old.
      3. 0
        22 August 2022 19: 58
        Quote: Third District
        Quote: paul3390
        And they tell us - like a dark scoop, galoshes there, the Bolsheviks curse, other nonsense ..

        And who says that? They say so because they themselves do not create anything. And if they did something, then again on the basis of Soviet developments, which had already been done earlier, in the late 80s, but troubled times followed. Recently they wanted to resume production of the MiG-31, but could not. Lost technology and skills. Because now effective managers are held in high esteem, like Serdyukov or Slyusar - the producer of the singer Glucose or someone's sons.

        That's for the future of Russia, taking into account such specialists, we have to worry. But who needs it.
    2. -3
      15 June 2022 10: 51
      I couldn’t wear jeans .. Feed me to satiety too .. That’s why everything fell apart ..
    3. -5
      15 June 2022 11: 16
      So he didn’t know how to do any, he couldn’t even provide the USSR with ramps, but riveting, regardless of the cost of complex objects, “a lot” of mind is not needed, especially if you close the borders and do not allow private entrepreneurship. They built pyramids in Egypt, also a technical miracle for those times.
    4. +4
      15 June 2022 11: 27
      Quote: paul3390
      And they tell us - like a dark scoop, galoshes there, the Bolsheviks curse, other nonsense ..

      And who says that? Well, except for those who couldn't master even two minutes of the president's speech? Or those who deliberately rip one paragraph out of a speech in order to earn points on a wave of hype? wink
      The fact of the matter is that GDP clearly separated the excellent defense industry and space of the USSR and the failure in the field of consumer goods, the symbol of which (and only them) became the notorious galoshes. Cutlets - separately, flies - separately. ©
      Yes, my dear, yes. No need to discuss. The fact is that what we produced (and we don’t have to wave our hands), nobody needed, because nobody bought our galoshes, except for the Africans, who had to walk on the hot sand. That is the whole point.
      We had a defense industry - cool, strong, and we are still proud of it. We are grateful to our grandfathers and our fathers for creating such a defense after the Great Patriotic War.
      From the audience: ... And the first satellite.
      Vladimir Putin: Both the first satellite and the first man in space are our common pride, these are the achievements of the Soviet regime, of which we are all proud. These are nationwide achievements.
      But consumer goods ... Zhirinovsky has already said this. Where were they? There were none. Let's not lie to each other and the people. The people know what was and what was not.
      1. 0
        3 July 2022 12: 17
        Yeah, but for some reason, the achievements of the defense and space industries, which were laid down back in the 50s, are opposed to the food shortages of the 80s.
        I think it’s not worth saying that the USSR under Stalin and under some kind of Gorbachev are two different countries.
        This is the lie (or substitution, if you like). The merits of the Soviet Union are thrown off on the "people", which, although partly true, the main role was still played by specific people in the leadership and specific specialists driving progress. And the mistakes of the union, spread over the whole country without learning the differences of the era and leadership. They like to talk about the food crisis, but they don’t mention that there was no such shortage in the 60s and 70s.
        So it turns out that the specialists and leaders of the 50s spent all their efforts on the rise of the country after the war and the flourishing of a new life, and now very populists explain the breakthrough by the fact that the people gathered like that. Although if you think about it - why then did the people not cope in the 90s?
        And when it comes to the shortcomings of the late Soviet Union, for some reason the names of the leaders and ministers who introduced erroneous laws do not indicate, but throw everything off as "well, this is the Soviet system" and show everything so it would be that the problems of the 80s would have been problems for throughout history and not just during the reign of a SPECIFIC leadership. Yes, and the names of some ministers who brought the Soviet Union to a crisis are missed not out of pity, but from the fact that many of these ministers later settled down well and led already in the independent CIS countries, including Russia. The ministers of Russia in the first half of the 90s will not say that they themselves are to blame for the problems of the Soviet Union and its collapse.
  7. Eug
    -8
    15 June 2022 06: 03
    But a replacement is needed, and, in my opinion, a return to the Tu-128 concept is optimal - with the possibility of long loitering in the air and the ability to hit not only missile launchers, but also their carriers before launch. Plus, the internal missile compartment is a sort of twin-engine Tu-160. Ideally, so that it can also perform the function of an MRA (to replace the Tu-22M3).
    1. +6
      15 June 2022 06: 09
      The concept of the MiG-31 implies a QUICK arrival at the place of interception or patrol .. For emergency plugging holes in conventional air defense. In addition, a permanent barrage of something like the Tu-128 will obviously be more expensive, no? And such an interceptor will obviously not be able to make a high-speed throw into the threatened zone ..
      1. Eug
        -4
        15 June 2022 08: 18
        If it will be with a variable sweep of the wing and from the position "on duty in the air" (during a threatened period) - it can!
      2. +6
        15 June 2022 08: 49
        "Conventional air defense" - the MiG-31 is the usual air defense.
        “Permanent barrage” - no one ever carries out constant barrage, this is not real.
        “High-speed throw into the threatened zone” - a high-speed throw is a wild consumption of fuel, it is carried out only to intercept a specific target, and then not always, because there may not be enough fuel to return home. Often it is quite possible to work at cruising speed on a collision course. By the way, the Tu-128 was the first domestic interceptor that could work like that.
    2. 0
      15 June 2022 20: 12
      Quote: Eug
      But a replacement is needed, and, as for me, a return to the Tu-128 concept is optimal
      I think that the Su-57 can take on the tasks of the MiG-31. It has cruiser supersonic, powerful radar and long-range missiles.
  8. +8
    15 June 2022 06: 08
    The MiG-31 is equipped with a six-barreled 23-mm automatic gun GSh-6-23M with 260 rounds of ammunition. The rate of fire of the gun is 6000 rounds / min.
    in fact, here she is -


    In his best)))
    And a little more on the 31st)) Those same "recesses" for hanging missiles -
  9. +1
    15 June 2022 06: 19
    Of course, it was necessary to criticize. Specialized magazines were filled with opinions about the fact that the aircraft was painted like a tractor, and the quality of welding leaves much to be desired, and so on. And they simply did not believe in a phased antenna array
    I remembered a joke ...: Soviet and American submarines meet in the "sea-ocean" on the surface ... Americans: Hello, Russian! Ours: What...? Creepy painted?! Torpedoes tovs! wink
  10. +9
    15 June 2022 06: 24
    Considering that all the units in service with the MiG-31 were located on the territory of Russia, the number of aircraft in service with the new Russia has not changed at all.
    According to Wikipedia, they were and still are in Kazakhstan. A couple of years ago, it was even on the news that one of them had crashed.
    So the only country that bought the MiG-31 was China. But we will talk about this in the next article, because the 24 aircraft acquired by the PLA Air Force can play a very interesting role in the future.
    But China is not on that list of MIG-31 owners, and is not even mentioned at all in either the Russian or English versions.
    1. +5
      15 June 2022 07: 10
      There are plenty of photos of Kazakh MiG-31s, but there are definitely none in China ...
  11. +4
    15 June 2022 06: 45
    But the professionals were shocked. Wow, those Russians did it again!

    Put up for sale all the latest developments of the USSR, in other countries they drove lead into their heads for less
  12. 0
    15 June 2022 06: 58
    Quote: paul3390
    It was an interesting time when our Motherland - the USSR, was able to make world-class objects of almost any complexity exclusively on its own .. And they tell us - like a dark scoop, galoshes there, curse the Bolsheviks, other nonsense ..

    And now our homeland Russia is making machines and devices unattainable for others. These are hypersonic missiles, and fast neutron reactors, small-sized nuclear reactors, icebreakers, space stations, centrifuges, and much more. Yes, this is all based on the knowledge of the developments of scientists from the USSR. But the achievements of the USSR were also based on scientists, engineers, universities, factories that grew out of the Russian Empire.
    1. +2
      16 June 2022 09: 13
      The USSR created an education system ..... in the Republic of Ingushetia there was what we are moving towards. Education for the Elite...
  13. +4
    15 June 2022 07: 01
    but the MiG-31 is not a modification, it is a completely different machine,

    That's it! Signature change under the third photo. MiG-25 looks like this.

  14. +4
    15 June 2022 07: 26
    It's just a miracle that no one bought the MIG-31. It was necessary to betray and hate this masterpiece so much in order to contemplate its sale abroad. It's just absurd. Such works of art must be inside the country until the end of days.
    1. +2
      15 June 2022 10: 35
      It's just a miracle that no one bought the MIG-31.

      What a miracle there is, the plane is niche, despite the masterpiece. Few people will suit, and most of them are tied to the United States. The rest is either redundant or there are no suitable targets, or simply too expensive and complicated.
      As for sales, there are no problems either - the MiG-25 was sold at one time. And the possibilities of the export version are significantly curtailed.
      1. +2
        15 June 2022 11: 57
        Quote: dzvero
        MiG-25 was sold at the time.

        Iraq. Hidden from the Americans MiG-25
        1. +2
          15 June 2022 16: 20
          As well as India, Libya, Syria, Algeria and Bulgaria. We seem to have scouts. a/b Dobrich and Balchik. Once I saw - I flew over the city center, the holiday was impressive !!!
          1. 0
            3 September 2022 10: 39
            4 pieces of MiG-25 were. But it was close to them in the skies of Bulgaria. Exchanged for MiG-23.
  15. +1
    15 June 2022 08: 31
    Planes don't fly at 1M. 1M>Vflight>1M
  16. 0
    15 June 2022 09: 40
    As I understand it, with refueling, this is too long a flight. How was the issue with the toilet on it resolved? Can’t you take a bucket with you?
  17. +2
    15 June 2022 10: 50
    In addition, the range of weapons was expanded with Kh-31P, Kh-25MP or Kh-25MPU anti-radar missiles (up to six units), X-31A anti-ship missiles (up to six), Kh-59 air-to-surface missiles and Kh-29T (up to three) or Kh-59M (up to two units), up to six KAB-1500 corrected air bombs or up to eight KAB-500 with television or laser guidance. The maximum payload weight is 9000 kg. Compared to 3000 kg and the MiG-31 - more than luxurious.

    The author confuses the MiG-31M and MiG-31BM (although what else to expect from Skomorokhov ....). Air-to-ground missiles were provided for the experimental MiG-31M, which never went into production. MiG-31BM does not carry weapons for ground operations.
  18. 0
    15 June 2022 12: 24
    For forty-five years this unsurpassed aircraft has been guarding the borders of our country. Quite a bit before the present anniversary. Strict and complex, but very effective and deadly, the aircraft has every chance to celebrate half a century of service with honor. Few aircraft can boast such a service life, especially the front line aircraft.

    ... many years of service for the good of the Motherland!
  19. -1
    15 June 2022 13: 10
    And the gun must be removed. This is architectural overkill. Avionics - the century before last (is the navigational-tactical indicator still rolling a paper map?) Everything must be converted to "number".
  20. 0
    15 June 2022 16: 18
    The MiG-31 became the main driver of the Blackbirds, especially in the skies over the Kola Peninsula

    In! Youth, youth... After all, in 84-86 I sat on that very Kola and looked at the IKO. And on it fell out from outside the IKO (600 km) "Black bustard" (for some reason we had such a designation) and figured along the coast. And the 31st jumped out of Monch to intercept her and accompanied them in parallel courses.
  21. 0
    15 June 2022 17: 18
    Is there at least an exemplary outfit of the enemy’s CD through the Arctic?
  22. 0
    15 June 2022 18: 04
    Good article! Only after the merger of instant and su. Will they be able to create a worthy replacement for this masterpiece in the face of instant 41? request
  23. 0
    15 June 2022 19: 43
    but, apparently, they wanted something that would make all enemies shudder.
    - yes, I agree, - a great occasion, girls love to surprise others with outfits. After reading this sentence, I did not hesitate to scroll through the publication to the end, hoping that I was mistaken and did not guess the author from the second sentence. But no.
  24. +2
    15 June 2022 21: 07
    In 1994 and 1999, the MiG-31 was involved in the tasks of monitoring the air situation over Chechnya, performing the functions of an AWACS aircraft.

    Who is he in the Chechen sky droneOsil something?
    What is characteristic:
    http://www.airwar.ru/history/locwar/chechnya/av1/av1.html
    Not a word about MIG-31
    So, in the 60s .... The main enemy was American cruise missiles,

    belay
    SLCM BGM-109 entered service in 1976
    LTV BGM-110 denied life in 1976
    Both started bullying in 1974.
    Riddle: how could they be the main opponents of the MiG-31 in the 60s?
    Initially, the fighter was developed to intercept aviation cruise missiles [3] [non-authoritative source?]

    A non-authoritative source on the wiki is pikability.
    ☝️ Some kind of vinaigrette
    1. +1
      15 June 2022 23: 29
      I confirm that the pilots from the "Bedrovy" blocked the sky over Chechnya.
      1. +2
        15 June 2022 23: 47
        I'm interested in who?
        Who could fly there?
        And who could: he did not take off and burned on the ground.
        And already in 1999 request eagles unless
  25. +1
    15 June 2022 23: 19
    Initially, there were MiG 31 (simple), then MiG 31DZ, then MiG 31B.
    After modernization in our time, the MiG 31 (simple without refueling) turned into the MiG 31BSM, the MiG 31DZ and MiG 31B turned into the MiG 31 BM.
    In the MiG 31K, both of them went for modernization.
  26. 0
    16 June 2022 00: 07
    Quote: Pavel73
    I disagree about degradation. If our Soviet civilization was so wonderful, then why did it disappear? The enemies did their best, this is certainly true, but we had such protection from them! How did they succeed? Simple: they exploited the flaws in our system. The main one is ignorance of the measure. What's the use of ultra-fast fighters if there are no sausages in the stores, and there are queues before fights for imported clothes. With these clothes, the enemies defeated the USSR. Belenko, who hijacked the MiG-25 to Japan, brought to our enemies not only a plane, but also extremely important information about the USSR - it’s BAD WITH SAUSAGE there! Enemies understood the weak point of the USSR, and then it was a matter of technology. Knowing that we and our fighter jets have been buying bread in the US and Canada for petrodollars for a long time, and by manipulating oil prices, they lowered our incomes, and after them the standard of living in the USSR, below the plinth, and managed to bring it down. This is what should not happen again. You need to know the measure and avoid distortions. We need a reasonable balance between fighters and sausage.

    You just need to properly raise your children. Just remember the film and book Eternal Call, the dialogue between Polipov and Lakhnovsky
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dchtANDIIQ
    1. +1
      16 June 2022 09: 02
      Any state-device system must develop and modernize ..... China was able to do this ..... the USSR could not .....
  27. +1
    16 June 2022 09: 00
    And why can't the same set of avionics be installed on the MiG31 as on the Su35S (or Su57 in the future)?
  28. Jan
    +1
    16 June 2022 10: 59
    Thank you for the article! Another confirmation that in the USSR, in spite of everything, excellent aircraft were produced! Yes, "condo", yes gluttonous and yes noisy, but advanced! And it was not today's blah blah, but a FACT! And now, after so many years, the interceptor aircraft are beginning to be modernized ... but it’s not clear what for! With "why" we can assume: there is nothing more "suitable" available! And why and who is to blame ???... No, well, in fact, the old interceptor is being modernized into a means of delivering tactical weapons !!! Everything would be clear with the modernization as an interceptor ... and so "not a candle to God ..."
  29. +1
    16 June 2022 18: 35
    Probably the most unique aircraft in the world, the MiG-31, owes its appearance to the mass appearance of cruise missiles in the US arsenal.

    The MiG-31 is primarily a development of the MiG-25, which was created to counter the SR-71 Blackbird high-altitude supersonic reconnaissance aircraft and promising supersonic bombers (I remind you that the B-1A had the same speed as the Tu-160). This aircraft is a high-altitude Supersonic interceptor, first of all.
    By the way, only he had good chances against Drozd, armed with R-33 missiles), and not with the one that was hung under the belly of the MiG-25.
    The super-powerful MiG radar sees a cruise missile (ordinary, not inconspicuous) already from .. 30 km. Su-35 is jealous of such power, being able to see the same CD from 35-40.
    True, unlike a highly specialized monster, the Su-35 can do a lot more.
    On the other hand, the more types of military equipment, the more relevant industries, supply chains and bread and caviar for the officials who manage them. The country is rich, there is enough for everyone good
    1. 0
      16 June 2022 19: 50
      Quote: 3danimal
      MiG-31 - first of all, it is a development of the MiG-25, which was created to counter the high-altitude supersonic reconnaissance aircraft SR-71 Blackbird
      They did it against the Valkyrie.
      Quote: 3danimal
      The super-powerful MiG radar sees a cruise missile (ordinary, not inconspicuous) already from .. 30 km. Su-35 is jealous of such power, being able to see the same CD from 35-40.
      A link would be very interesting.
      1. +2
        16 June 2022 22: 21
        Link would be very interesting
        These are data from the beginning of the 80s, only the author of these figures forgot to mention that the MiG-25 radar would not have seen such a low-altitude target at all, and many air defense systems would not have been able to achieve such a detection range against the background of the underlying surface.
  30. 0
    4 August 2022 20: 52
    The MIG-31 is a well-deserved pride of Russia, but perhaps now the next step is needed - a hypersonic aircraft for working in near space.
  31. 0
    9 September 2022 20: 16
    A few comments:
    1. I served in the army in the mid-80s and we "led" the Sr71 over the Barents Sea on average 2 times a week. Not about any "visits" in v.p. I have not heard of the USSR.
    2. As for long-range non-stop flights of tactics, the Americans flew REGULARLY and in BUTS of 10-20 aircraft across the Atlantic on F15 or F16. Only A10s made an intermediate landing on the a.b. Lagens. That. with them, any lieutenant or starley could sit in diapers in the cockpit for 8-10 hours (speed KS135 or 10 that accompanied them)
  32. 0
    11 September 2022 08: 30
    commentators who claim that the MiG-31 is outdated do not know one simple thing, the Foxhaund is an air defense fighter, its main task is to destroy cruise missiles reaching a target at low altitude, and it copes with these missiles very well. Quickly reaches the line of attack, sees many targets and shoots them from above.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"