Guns, bombs and interference. Combat capabilities of the Il-76 military transport aircraft

66

Il-76MD firing at a ground target, November 2021

The main function of the Il-76 military transport aircraft is to transport people and various cargoes. At the same time, it also has other capabilities directly related to military use. So, on board the aircraft there is a set of systems and weapons with which it can protect itself from attack or attack the intended ground target.

For defense and strikes


The future Il-76 was developed in the late sixties by order of the USSR Air Force. The troops needed a large-capacity aircraft capable of carrying a variety of cargo and providing airborne landings. The intended functions and tasks had the most noticeable impact on the appearance, equipment and characteristics of the resulting aircraft.



In particular, it was believed that during the landing operation, the transport aircraft would have to break through the enemy's air defenses. In this regard, he needed means for self-defense against radar, fighter aviation and anti-aircraft missiles. In addition, it was proposed to give the aircraft limited strike capabilities. All these requirements were taken into account in the project.


Tail fuselage with gun mount

To prevent or hinder detection by various means, the aircraft was equipped with devices for shooting chaff and false thermal targets. It was proposed to fight fighters or missiles with the help of a stern gun mount. Also provided for the possibility of using free-falling bombs.

Serial production of the Il-76 started in the early seventies, and at the same time they launched the process of creating new modifications, which continues to this day. During the development of the basic version of the aircraft, the design was finalized, various systems and instruments were replaced. Also improved means of protection. However, no fundamental changes were introduced.

In addition, in recent decades, there has been a course towards the abandonment of some protection systems. So, the last version of the Il-76MD-90A aircraft at the moment does not have a stern gun mount. In addition, the demonstrated samples of this type, leaving the factory, did not have devices for firing DO and LTC. The exact composition of radio-electronic equipment is also unclear.


four trunks


The most notable means of self-defense of the IL-76 is the 9-A-503 gun mount. It is located in the tail of the fuselage, under the cockpit glazing, and is intended to destroy air and ground targets in the rear hemisphere. The installation has remotely controlled guidance drives and carries two 23-mm double-barreled guns GSh-23. Each such gun shows a rate of fire of 3-4 thousand rounds / min.

The aft installation is controlled by a senior air gunner working in the cockpit next to it. At his workplace there is an optical sighting station with a collimator sight and a remote control. A Krypton radar sight with a ballistic computer is also provided, which simplifies the defeat of high-speed targets. The Krypton antenna is located inside its own fairing above the cockpit glazing.


Training bomb under the wing

The gun mount is intended for self-defense against fighters or missiles attacking from the rear hemisphere. The high performance of the two guns and the presence of advanced control systems provide a high probability of hitting such a target. In addition, when flying at low altitude, the GSh-23 can be used against ground targets within the shooter's field of view. However, in this case, the search for targets is more difficult and the time for attack is reduced.

Protection against detection


Already in the first versions of the Il-76 project, measures were provided for protection against radar and infrared detection and / or guidance. With further modernization, such systems were preserved, but their composition and configuration changed several times.

An invariable component of the Il-76 of various modifications and series built for the Air Force was the SPO-10 radiation warning station. According to her signals, the crew had to use the available countermeasures, the composition of which changed in different series. In recent modernization projects, it was planned to supplement it with ultraviolet missile launch warning sensors.


Target hit

When irradiating an enemy radar or detecting a missile launch, the aircraft must use automatic jamming devices. Initially, the IL-76 received four APP-50R assault rifles: two on the fairings of the main landing gear and two on the sides behind them. All of these systems contained 384 rounds with false thermal targets or chaff. Later, the configuration and placement of the machines changed. So, later modifications receive a pair of such devices on the fuselage, and with the preservation of the previous ammunition load. Similar ASO-2I-E7r assault rifles were also introduced.

Part of the aircraft from different series and different years of production received electronic warfare equipment. They were equipped with active interference stations of the Lilac family or later systems of this kind. However, it is somewhat known that most of the built IL-76s could only put passive interference.

Transport Bomber


The transport Il-76 is capable of bombing ground targets. For this, four UBD-3DA universal beam holders are provided on the wing consoles. On each of them is suspended one free-falling bomb of caliber up to 500 kg. Due to the lack of necessary control instruments, the aircraft cannot use guided weapons.


bomb drop

The navigator, who works in the forward glazed cockpit, is responsible for the use of bombs. Bombs are dropped using the Kupol automated flight and navigation sighting system. There is also a manually operated NKBP-7 bombsight.

Weapons and practice


The protection systems of the Il-76 aircraft have been repeatedly tested in practice, both in training and in combat conditions. In local conflicts of recent decades, aircraft have faced the threat of portable anti-aircraft missile systems. In this regard, the crews had to constantly use the APP-50R and LTC assault rifles for them. Such protection and competent actions of the crews gave the desired result - losses from MANPADS were minimal all the time.

In peacetime, Il-76 crews mainly solve the tasks of transporting people and goods, and also participate in various exercises. In addition, they regularly get the opportunity to test their skills in the use of regular weapons. During such events, navigators attack ground targets with training bombs, and gunners fire from stern guns.


The experience of such exercises shows that the IL-76 has a certain potential as a strike aircraft. Bombs of caliber up to 500 kg and 23-mm shells are capable of destroying manpower, equipment and enemy buildings. The accuracy of firing and bombing as a whole corresponds to the tasks and requirements. However, in terms of its combat qualities, the transport aircraft is significantly inferior to specialized bombers. Cannon and bomb weapons are considered solely as an auxiliary means.

Development continues


The Il-76 military transport aircraft is designed to operate in difficult conditions and in the presence of a number of serious threats. In this regard, from the very beginning, he had means of protection of various kinds. In addition, they provided for the possibility of striking ground targets. Almost all aircraft available in the Russian Air Force have this configuration and corresponding capabilities.

However, working conditions and customer requirements change. As part of the latest modernization of the IL-76MD-90A, it was decided to abandon the stern gun mount. At the same time, other units were used and new opportunities were obtained. And there is reason to believe that the increased level of protection fully compensated for the losses from the removal of cannon weapons. How other elements of protection and weapons will develop, time will tell.
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    22 June 2022 16: 07
    The experience of such exercises shows that the IL-76 has a certain potential as a strike aircraft. Bombs of caliber up to 500 kg and 23-mm shells are capable of destroying manpower, equipment and enemy buildings.
    I really would not want someone to have the idea to test this in combat conditions
    1. 0
      22 June 2022 17: 03
      https://topwar.ru/29617-il-76md-90a-ili-izdelie-476.html
    2. +3
      22 June 2022 20: 46
      Why check in combat conditions, if the accuracy depends on the flight altitude. The higher, the worse.
      Accuracy per hectare, even for the FAB 500 is nonsense.
      And flying low over the battlefield on such a pepelace is tantamount to suicide.
  2. sen
    +1
    22 June 2022 16: 14
    There is also an electronic warfare aircraft Il-76PP.
    http://авиару.рф/aviamuseum/aviatsiya/sssr/samolety-spetsnaznacheniya/samolety-reb/samolet-reb-il-76pp/?
    1. 0
      23 June 2022 00: 25
      And on the basis of the Il-76MD, the Il-78 tanker was designed. After the transfer of the Il-76 production to the Aviastar-SP plant in Ulyanovsk, on the basis of the new Il-76MD-90A, a new Il-78M-90A tanker was developed and began to be produced. hi
    2. 0
      27 June 2022 22: 43
      There is no such aircraft. I report as an electronic warfare engineer. At one time they tried to make a director out of the 76th car, but it didn’t work out. Summed up BKO "Lily of the valley". The same "Lily of the Valley", which was put on the Su-24MP and which they failed to bring to mind. They built an installation series of 10 cars and the project was closed. By the way, after the collapse of the USSR, 9 dryers remained in Ukraine. 76PP existed in a single copy. EW equipment for 76th place in the museum. SPO-10 is a terrible primitive, at least half a century old. ASO-2I, APP - stone age. It's time to put on the 76th normal, modern airborne defense system.
  3. 0
    22 June 2022 16: 19
    Reliable aircraft. I hope he does not need to use protective equipment.
  4. +4
    22 June 2022 16: 24
    Since 1971, TAPOiCH has built 957 boards of various modifications. In the 80s, the output rate reached 6 units per month! In 2012, the government of Uzbekistan declared bankrupt. All branches have become independent enterprises of various profiles. Andijan and Ferghana on their own.
    1. +3
      22 June 2022 20: 49
      The peak of production was in 85-87 years, up to 26 pieces per year.
  5. 0
    22 June 2022 16: 26
    Cannons to bombs are not a hindrance!
    Golden words ... wink
  6. -8
    22 June 2022 16: 27
    Such a glider should be used only for dropping oversized bombs and non-standard explosive devices weighing over 3000 ... 5000 kg. (like "Mother of all bombs"). There is a jamming station on every aircraft. But they don't work! Planes crash. Special air forces are needed to carry out special operations to destroy the air defenses of advanced armies along the route of attack and military transport aircraft. Such tasks were once performed by An-12PP air regiments. They were subordinated to the General Staff of the USSR Armed Forces. There was even an experience of their successful combat use against Israel (in general).
    1. +4
      22 June 2022 16: 45
      They were subordinated to the General Staff of the USSR Armed Forces. There was even an experience of their successful combat use against Israel

      The USSR did not fight Israel. Well, the actions of Arabs of all stripes against this country can be called successful only with a very big stretch, and then only because Israel could always stop in time.
      1. -3
        22 June 2022 19: 52
        I don't need to tell the history of the USSR.
        Israel also does not have nuclear weapons, but if necessary, it will use them.
  7. nnm
    0
    22 June 2022 17: 07
    A question from an amateur - but does it make sense to make an analogue of the AC-130 out of it?
    1. +3
      22 June 2022 17: 21
      Quote: nnm
      Question from an amateur - does it make sense to make an analogue of the B-52 out of it?

      Does the IL-76 have a range like that of the B-52N and is it capable of carrying missiles?
      1. nnm
        0
        22 June 2022 17: 25
        Got better. Of course, I meant AC-130.
        Yes, and even if the B-52 - but you can’t make a platform for CR or hypersound?
        1. +6
          22 June 2022 17: 37
          Quote: nnm
          Got better. Of course, I meant AC-130.

          The Americans have the C-5B Galaxy with a carrying capacity of more than 110 tons, as well as the very successful C-17A Globemaster III with a carrying capacity of more than 70 tons. Nevertheless, the US Air Force is not going to abandon the B-52H, the production of which was completed in 1962. A bomber is a bomber, and a transport is a transport. A different concept and different tasks laid down at the design stage. As for the use of the Il-76 as a bomber, in modern conditions this is nonsense. In local conflicts, the An-12 showed itself well. But on it the bombs were not hung under the planes, but loaded onto a conveyor belt inside the fuselage. As a bomb carrier, military-technical cooperation can only be used where there is no developed air defense. Otherwise, painful losses are guaranteed.
          1. -7
            22 June 2022 17: 54
            It's funny to read this. You might think that the B-52 can be used with advanced enemy air defense. And the losses of the Il-76 cannot be called significant even in Afghanistan, where the enemy had more than enough MANPADS.
            1. +3
              22 June 2022 20: 10
              And they didn’t fly across Afghanistan, only from the Union to the Kabul airfield and back.
              In 1985, one, while landing, was shot down (I didn’t look at the statistics on them, they were shot down when I was still working there).
              1. -6
                22 June 2022 20: 32
                So what? Did they really have to barrage at low altitudes in all provinces? If only someone in aviation topics would give really weighty arguments, such as the fact that bomb bays cannot be arranged or there is not enough safety margin. The most that imaginary experts are capable of is to complain about low security, you might think it is better with the B-52. The level of discussion in terms of content is reminiscent of scribbling from Andrey VOVthat I participated and therefore the most competent.
                1. +3
                  22 June 2022 20: 56
                  Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
                  The level of discussion in terms of content is reminiscent of writing from Andrey VOV,
                  What did you mean ?
              2. +4
                22 June 2022 21: 16
                They shot down more than one for statistics.
                They flew not only to Kabul,
                and also Kandahar, Shindand, Bagram.
                1. 0
                  22 June 2022 21: 31
                  Quote: Arkady007
                  They flew not only to Kabul, but also to Kandahar, Shindand, Bagram ....
                  Apparently, flights to these cities were associated with direct deliveries of cargo from the Union to a specific city, but this aircraft over the territory of Afghanistan was, after all, a rarity. An-26, An-12, and helicopters (Mi-8, Mi-24, Mi-6) were the workhorses over the territory.
                  1. +4
                    22 June 2022 21: 38
                    Again past about the rarity.
                    1. 0
                      22 June 2022 21: 51
                      Quote: Arkady007
                      Again past about the rarity.
                      I speak based on what I saw myself from the spring of 1983 to the spring of 1985. During the first year, I traveled Afghanistan up and down (especially the right half).
                      There was a period (1984) when there were a lot of arrivals of cargo planes from the Union - this was during the operation on Pansher.
                      1. +7
                        22 June 2022 22: 10
                        For accuracy - the Panjshir Gorge. Only our regiment in 9 years completed 3248 flights to Afghanistan on the Il-76. Plus, at least 6 more regiments flew to Afghanistan on Ilah. Every day, 3-5 planes took off from Tuzeli, plus Kokaydy, Ferghana, Mary and all sorts of things.
                      2. -1
                        22 June 2022 22: 27
                        Quote: Arkady007
                        Only our regiment in 9 years completed 3248 flights to Afghanistan on the Il-76. Plus, at least 6 more regiments flew to Afghanistan on Ilah .....
                        It seems as if we are writing about different countries. Most of my business trips around Afghanistan were turntables (with columns much less often), and since I am not indifferent to aviation, I did not leave anything that stood at the airfields without attention. All that I saw from the trucks is An-26, An-12, An-32 (rarely). Of the combat ones, we have the MiG-21 and Su-25, the Afghans have the Su-7B. They came across in the parking lots of IL-28 (among the Afghans), but I did not see them flying.
                        I repeat, this is 1983-1985 (Andropos times).
                      3. +3
                        22 June 2022 22: 42
                        From the 84th there was about a year of break in the flights of Ilov. In connection with the advent of the Stingers. Until they captured and learned its characteristics.
            2. +3
              22 June 2022 20: 58
              Tactics are changing and the capabilities of air defense systems are changing. You would still remember how Mamai shot with a bow.
              1. -4
                22 June 2022 22: 45
                What is this for? Protection is also improving, complexes like "Vitebsk" appear.
          2. +5
            22 June 2022 20: 55
            Carpet bombing is banned by the UN, and in fact it does not have a tape drive mechanism.
            And he is not capable of more in a combat situation.
            There is no place for him in the modern theater of operations.
            There are no opportunities for landing the Airborne Forces, this is an anachronism.
            1. -6
              22 June 2022 22: 47
              Is it more profitable to drive the Tu-22 to the bombing of the surrounded industrial zone, or is it still to use an aircraft with a high carrying capacity, reliability and engine life for this?
              1. +2
                23 June 2022 08: 27
                According to all your recommendations, one gets the feeling that you are in the market selling hats, reading books about the war.
    2. -5
      22 June 2022 17: 22
      There is a sense, but no one is in a hurry with it.
      1. +1
        25 June 2022 02: 07
        There is a sense, but no one is in a hurry with it

        Already puzzled: Rapid Dragon.
        December 2021
        Over the Gulf of Mexico, the crew of the aircraft dropped a pallet onto which three mock cruise missiles and one combat missile were loaded, which was supposed to hit the target. The pallet was dropped by parachute, after which the missiles separated. The combat missile deployed control surfaces, stabilized its flight and turned on the engine, after which it headed towards the target.

        The Air Force believes that this system can be used on other types of aircraft. In the spring of 2022, the launch is planned from the C-17 Globemaster heavy transport aircraft.


        https://www.defensenews.com/training-sim/2021/12/17/us-air-force-blows-up-a-target-with-a-cruise-missile-from-a-cargo-plane/
        Data link capabilities and Bouvet change the rules:
        Previously, entering a flight mission took ten minutes, via cable, now the aircraft's combat control system receives updated target designation, transmits this information to the launched missile. This was the first time that new target data had been transmitted aboard the missile during flight.
        It really does make sense:
        It is assumed that such use of cruise missiles can make up for the shortage of combat aircraft. providing support for troops in local conflicts. At the same time, methods of retargeting missiles in flight can be used on other platforms.

        There are a lot of BTA aircraft, not very bombers. Well, they sure do.
    3. +5
      22 June 2022 17: 25
      I think it makes no sense .. Initially, it was imprisoned for a truck, and B52 for a bomber jacket. And what tasks should he then solve?
      1. -11
        22 June 2022 17: 29
        Yes, the same tasks that the B-52 solves. I don’t think that you own aircraft designs enough to draw conclusions about which one is and what it is imprisoned for.
        1. +8
          22 June 2022 17: 30
          It is a big mistake to draw conclusions about a person, his knowledge and skills, without knowing him.
          1. -5
            22 June 2022 17: 50
            Sometimes I read what you write, not a single comment on the substance of the issue, only claims to the interlocutors about their participation. The conclusions are appropriate.
            1. +5
              22 June 2022 19: 32
              You read badly and draw bad conclusions, but it's up to you
              1. -5
                22 June 2022 19: 36
                Another empty comment, which did not come as a surprise.
            2. +4
              22 June 2022 21: 00
              You have to read and think.
              Even the Mongols had different bows, and you are talking about airplanes.
              1. -5
                22 June 2022 22: 44
                Actually, they meant empty meaningless comments from the opponent. What are you talking about?
    4. -4
      22 June 2022 17: 43
      approximate analogue - Tu-95
    5. -5
      22 June 2022 19: 51
      Our structures are not capable of making an analogue of AS-130. Otherwise it would have already been done. And by the way, who could be entrusted with this business?
      1. -2
        23 June 2022 08: 40
        Our structures are not capable of making an analogue of AS-130. Otherwise it would have already been done. And by the way, who could be entrusted with this business?

        Why only a goat button accordion? Or do you have a strange aggressor in mind in which air defense is completely absent, and MANPADS are so rare that they haven’t seen it in your eyes
  8. -2
    22 June 2022 19: 01
    To launch cruise missiles would be ideal.
    1. -1
      22 June 2022 19: 58
      Would be. They were built in the late 1970s .. early 1980s in Tashkent. Where is Tashkent now? Correctly. In the same place as Karaganda.
      1. 0
        22 June 2022 20: 24
        Quote: iouris
        Would be. They were built in the late 1970s .. early 1980s in Tashkent. Where is Tashkent now? Correctly. In the same place as Karaganda.

        There is an Ulyanovsk airstar, it produces new Il-76s.
        1. +1
          22 June 2022 23: 53
          I also heard about it (that they are being produced), but have not yet seen it.
  9. Alf
    +2
    22 June 2022 19: 17
    two 23 mm double-barreled guns

    characteristics of two guns

    So two or four?
    1. nnm
      +4
      22 June 2022 19: 55
      Two double-barreled
      1. Alf
        +1
        22 June 2022 20: 33
        Well, yes. Thank you.
    2. 0
      22 June 2022 19: 55
      Two cannons GSh-23 has two barrels. Check the rate of fire on the Internet if you are interested. Very high. High enough to effectively shoot down an aerial target at an effective range.
      1. +3
        22 June 2022 21: 04
        Big BUT - effective range 2-4 km.
        When launching missiles from a fighter with a minimum range of 5 km.
        That's why they were removed.
        1. -5
          22 June 2022 22: 50
          On ships, automatic guns are also used to repel missile attacks, so that's not an argument.
          1. 0
            25 June 2022 02: 17
            On ships automatic guns

            1. There are several other guns

            With its own suo, but integrated with the bius, baalsha, very
            2. Even for IL-76, 5 tons is a bit much, and where it is “convenient” to place it
            3. With rare exceptions, subsonic anti-ship missiles
            4. The dimensions of the PKR are probably an order of magnitude or many times greater than the RVV
            5. There are a lot of chances that the PKR hit the ship “like a pellet of an elephant”, and there are a lot of fragments or striking elements, but for la it is almost fatal.
            5. It is difficult to organize damage control on an aircraft after exposure to damaging elements, and the ship, as a rule, will continue without.
        2. +2
          22 June 2022 23: 57
          The effective range is somewhere around 1200 ... 800 meters.
          This gun was installed on the MiG-21, -23, Su-24, etc., as well as in suspended rotary gun mounts (SPPU).
          1. +1
            23 June 2022 08: 20
            This means that the effectiveness of countermeasures is even worse.
  10. -2
    23 June 2022 00: 57
    If my memory serves me right, all the military transport workers of the USSR were adapted, or rather, already during the development of the structure, the possibility of bombing ground targets was laid in it. At the very least, bomb racks and bomb sights for them were immediately developed. All this has been going on since WWII. Suffice it to recall that the most massive bomber of the Soviet Air Force during the Second World War was the transport and passenger Li-2, modified to the Li-2NB - a night bomber. Yes, there are transport! Such an "exotic" training aircraft as the Tu-134UBL, also during development, immediately received the opportunity for bombing - 2 holders for training weapons and the ability to install 4 multi-lock bomb racks. In the picture - Tu-134UBL hi
    1. +2
      23 June 2022 11: 07
      Quote: Vladislav 73
      Such an "exotic" training aircraft as the Tu-134UBL also immediately got the opportunity for bombing during development ....
      This aircraft was developed as a training aircraft for pilots of the Tu-22 and Tu-160 aircraft, therefore the bomb racks are in place (and what else should the desk of bomber pilots have?)
      1. 0
        23 June 2022 14: 06
        I know what it was designed for. And he wrote that 2 holders for "training" aids under the center section of the wing, for naval aviation pilots, were equipped with a Kh-22M cruise missile simulator. But "real" bomb racks are present as an option, but not installed. In addition, the Soviet-Amer treaties prohibit the installation of bomb racks on such aircraft. From them, as well as from the Tu-22M3, equipment for refueling in the air was also dismantled. Well, something like this hi
  11. +2
    23 June 2022 03: 17
    What kind of war are they preparing for? To the first world?
  12. -2
    23 June 2022 13: 13
    ... if only to stir up a real "ganship" at its base ... it would be a monster .....
  13. -1
    23 June 2022 16: 26
    Quote: Arkady007
    The peak of production was in 85-87 years, up to 26 pieces per year.

    Now such rates of production look fantastic.
  14. 0
    4 September 2022 08: 24
    What are these special features? Any adequate IL-76 pilot will directly tell you that they will then be called kamikaze pilots, and not VTA pilots! Only transportation, no airborne landings - this is nonsense in our conditions (if only participation in local conflicts in third world countries, somewhere in Africa) ... I read somewhere that our strategists were preparing almost 40 aircraft for landing near Kyiv, but the operation was canceled ... can you imagine how many sides were destined not to return! ??? If there were losses, and significant ones at the helicopter landing, and there were more than 200 sides ...., then what can we say about ILs !? The amers have an assault aircraft based on the S-130, which showed itself well in Iraq, Afghanistan ... but again, this is where, where we are not! And what will happen to him in Europe ..- cover! So here too...