Active rockets M549A1 for Ukrainian howitzers

55

155 mm NATO-style shells. Photo Telegram / "Military informant"

Foreign countries in the order of military assistance transfer to the Ukrainian army a variety of artillery systems and ammunition for them. Recently it became known that along with the American M777 howitzers, 155-mm M549A1 active-rockets arrived in Ukraine. These products are not new, but are suitable for solving all major combat missions - and their appearance requires an appropriate response.

Help with artillery


As part of one of the stages of military-technical assistance, the United States plans to transfer 90 M777 howitzers and 184 rounds for them to Ukraine. A dozen more guns and a large number of shells will be provided by Australia and Canada. Calculations are also taught. To date, the United States has shipped almost all of the guns and about two-thirds of the planned amount of ammunition. The Ukrainian side claims that the first howitzers have already reached the front, and their combat use is beginning.



As always, the Ukrainian military does not miss the opportunity to boast of imported novelties. The other day, a set of photographs appeared in Ukrainian sources from the position of one of the artillery units equipped with the new M777s. In one of the shots, standard pallets with foreign shells got into the frame.

Despite the low quality of the image, you can see some of the design features of the shells, as well as determine their markings. Closer to the camera are the M549A1 products - 155 mm active rockets designed and manufactured in the USA. They differ from standard high-explosive fragmentation shells in their increased firing range.

According to various foreign sources, the US artillery aid package may include several thousand active-rocket M549A1. At the same time, the exact number of such shells planned for transfer and already shipped to the recipient remains unknown.

However, it is now clear that howitzers and ammunition for them have reached Ukraine and are on the front lines. Moreover, some samples have already managed to change the owner. Just yesterday, there were reports of the first M777, which became a trophy of the Russian army.

previous generation


The future M549 was developed in the US in the seventies for use with existing and future 155mm guns such as the M114, M198 or M109. The requirements for the new ammunition were determined by the characteristics of these guns, and in the future this led to the emergence of various restrictions. Currently, we are talking about obsolescence and the need for replacement.

Active rockets M549A1 for Ukrainian howitzers

Projectile M549(A1) in section. FAS Graphics

The basic version of the M549 projectile was not widely used. Due to the insufficient stability of the explosive in the warhead, it could not be used with the new reinforced M203 propellant charge. In this regard, in 1977, the upgraded M549A1 projectile was created and put into service.

Improved ammunition entered the gross production and was supplied in large quantities to the artillery units of the US Army and other countries. Despite its considerable age, the M549A1 remains the main 155-mm active-rocket of the American artillery. It is used with all major types of artillery, from older M109s to modern M777s.

However, the characteristics of the M549A1 no longer fully meet the requirements of the Pentagon, and therefore measures are being taken to replace it. In the near future, a new XM1113 projectile with increased range and accuracy will enter production. It is planned to be used both with modern artillery systems and with weapons under development.

Technical features


Products M549 and M549A1 are artillery shells of 155 mm caliber of separate loading, compatible with various propellant charges and guns of American design. They differ from ordinary "blanks" by the presence of their own solid-propellant jet engine, with the help of which an increase in the firing range is ensured. The total length of the M549(A1) projectile is 873,5 mm with a caliber of 155 mm. Weight - 43,5 kg.

When using a gun with a barrel length of 39 klb and a full charge, the maximum range of the M549A1 product reaches 30 km against 22,4 km for a conventional projectile. The 52-caliber barrel allows you to send active-reactive ammunition to 40 km.

M549(A1) projectiles are made in a forged steel case, consisting of two parts. The larger head has an ogive shape and performs the functions of a warhead. It contains an explosive charge and carries a head fuse. The tail compartment is the body of the jet engine.


One of the compatible propellant charges is an M203 in a cap. U.S. Department of Defense graphics

The basic modification of the M549 carried 16 pounds (7,3 kg) of Composition B explosive. Due to the low impact resistance in the M549A1 project, it was replaced with 15 pounds (6,8 kg) of TNT. In both cases, an impact fuse is used with the possibility of setting a delay. Undermining the charge leads to the destruction of the body of the projectile with the formation of a large number of high-velocity fragments.

The jet engine of the projectile holds two checkers of solid fuel with a total mass of 3,2 kg. Ignition is carried out using a retarder set for 7 seconds. Powder gases are ejected through a conical nozzle into the bottom of the housing.

Preparation for a shot with an active-rocket projectile is minimally different from the use of other ammunition. In this case, it is required to use the appropriate shooting tables. At the time of the shot, the flame of the propellant charge ignites the retarder of the jet engine. After 7 sec. after that, the engine ignites, and for the next 3 seconds. the projectile gains additional acceleration. Further, the flight passes by inertia, and the increased speed allows you to increase its range.

Threat and reaction


The modern M777 towed howitzer with the M549A1 active-rocket projectile can be a very effective weapon. Such systems give the Ukrainian army new combat capabilities and lead to additional risks. This is not a reason for panic, but requires a timely and complete response.

First of all, the danger of new artillery systems is due to the increased firing range. With the help of the M777 and M549A1 products, the Ukrainian army gets the opportunity to attack civilian and military targets at a greater depth of defense. At the same time, American guns in range surpass some of the systems in service with the defenders of Donbass.

Additional risks are associated with the fact that the M777 howitzer has an advanced digital fire control system and is characterized by increased accuracy when using all compatible projectiles. In the presence of high-quality intelligence data, such a system poses an increased danger.


Shooting from the M777 howitzer. Photo by the US Department of Defense

However, all the advantages of imported howitzers and shells can be answered. Moreover, the fight against such threats does not require fundamental innovations and can be carried out only by existing means already used in the Special Operations zone.

Reconnaissance means and systems are of decisive importance in the fight against new howitzers. Timely detection of guns on the march or in positions allows you to strike and disable them. An attack can be preemptive or retaliatory, depending on various factors. It is also necessary to identify storage sites for guns and ammunition. Apparently, all this will not be a difficult task - our army has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to search for and identify enemy targets.

The defeat of new guns and ammunition can be carried out by any available forces and means available on the site. According to the target designation of reconnaissance, cannon or rocket artillery should work, aviation or missile systems. In this case, the combat mission is assigned to the nearest fire weapon capable of performing a strike in the minimum time.

In general, the Russian army has every opportunity to timely detect and destroy foreign howitzers and ammunition for them. Moreover, such targets can be destroyed even at the stage of transportation and before entering the combat zone. This option of dealing with enemy artillery, for obvious reasons, is preferable.

Practical results


Thus, American howitzers and shells handed over to the Ukrainian army find themselves in a difficult situation. They have good characteristics and, in theory, can effectively solve various combat missions. However, the realization of the full potential of such systems is impossible. It is hampered by the insufficient number of howitzers, the limited level of training of personnel and the most active opposition from the Russian side.

As a result, the prospects for the "Ukrainian" M777 and M549A1 products are predictable and obvious. significant portion weapons and ammunition will be destroyed under certain circumstances; some won't even make it to the combat zone. More successful examples will not be destroyed, but will become a trophy for the advancing Russian and Republican troops.
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    13 May 2022 05: 13
    More successful examples will not be destroyed, but will become a trophy for the advancing Russian and Republican troops.
    A very optimistic statement! And the gun is very deadly...
    1. +1
      13 May 2022 05: 53
      "Very optimistic statement! And the gun is very deadly..." There is only one way out: to find supplies of these long-range shells deep in the rear of the enemy and set fire to wagons or trucks with these shells. Then the reactive part of the shells will work and they will scatter throughout the district, causing damage to the Ukronazi evil spirits.
    2. +3
      13 May 2022 07: 34
      Quote from Uncle Lee
      And the gun is very deadly...

      Are there non-lethal guns?
      In the near future, a new XM1113 projectile with increased range and accuracy will enter production.
      As soon as it is adopted, it will be the M1113. "X" designation of prototypes
      1. -1
        13 May 2022 11: 47
        Forty-five and "Dora" - both guns, and which is more deadly? I drew attention to this - very deadly! hi
      2. 0
        17 May 2022 22: 52
        Are there non-lethal guns?
        Yes, I have! For example... wink
    3. +4
      13 May 2022 07: 50
      All guns are deadly.
      1. -5
        13 May 2022 11: 45
        Quote: Nikolai Vasiliev_2
        All guns are deadly.

        I agree ! Forty-five and "Dora" - both guns, and which is more deadly?
        1. -3
          13 May 2022 21: 45
          Magpie, of course. Given that their sea, and Dora is not exactly known whether it existed.
          1. +1
            15 May 2022 10: 44
            According to Discovery there was a program - "the most powerful earthmoving machines."
            Compiled the top 10 most serious excavators. Gradually we approached mining rotary excavators the size of a large house.
            And in the first place they put a small wheeled one. There are just so, so many of them, and together they move a lot more land.
    4. +2
      13 May 2022 08: 49
      The author described everything correctly. I would like to destroy them in the process of transportation. Well, absolutely fantastic desire - right in the production shops.
    5. +1
      14 May 2022 16: 11
      Apparently, the APU received howitzers themselves, but did not receive a digital fire control system.
      This is the most common M777 - with optical fire control, and not the A1 / A2 modifications.

      They are guided in the old fashioned way, which drastically reduces the declared capabilities of the "wunderwaffe".
      The promised tractors are also not visible, they are pulling for KrAZ trucks.

      In the first two photos, the Americans have elements of this system.
      On the rest, how it looks like in the Armed Forces of Ukraine.




      1. +1
        15 May 2022 12: 18
        Adjusted by drones, it can be no less accurate than with a digital control system. A drone is feedback, and without it, any shooting is essentially blind.
        1. 0
          15 May 2022 23: 00
          True, but how invulnerable are the remnants of Ukrainian drones?
        2. 0
          12 June 2022 23: 59
          Each art. the target is observed by optical instruments. Shooting "blindly" is not foreseen by charters and instructions.
    6. 0
      21 July 2022 09: 41
      The weapon should be in skillful, highly motivated hands with normal command, in the absence of one of the components, that's it, hello ..
  2. +4
    13 May 2022 05: 25
    With the help of the M777 and M549A1 products, the Ukrainian army gets the opportunity to attack civilian and military targets at a greater depth of defense.
    fool These shells and guns will allow shelling the territory of Russia and will lead to the death of our civilian population, which will lead to discontent. When "working" against the troops, the guns will be located at a greater depth and it will be possible to destroy them only with similar systems or VKS. request
    1. 0
      14 May 2022 00: 18
      At such distances, the accuracy of the fire is negligible. Only spend shells in empty.
      1. 0
        13 June 2022 00: 00
        Such ranges are advertising to the public.
  3. -5
    13 May 2022 05: 34
    It pleases us that the US cannons from the Ukronazis have already intercepted ours ... now we still have to intercept a car of shells and launch them at the military targets of the Ukronazis “However, it is now clear that the howitzers and ammunition for them have reached Ukraine and are on the front line. Moreover, some samples have already managed to change owners. Just yesterday, there were reports of the first M777, which became a trophy of the Russian army.”
    1. +7
      13 May 2022 09: 29
      No one intercepted them, there was a cropped screen from the video of the same Butusov, I am attaching a photo
      And how to intercept them if they are in the depths of defense

    2. +7
      13 May 2022 15: 35
      The joke is that it’s generally useless to capture NATO artillery: the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the LDNR have nothing to shoot from them, and no one knows how to handle them. So, put in a museum of trophies, nothing more.
      1. -1
        13 May 2022 22: 25
        Quote: Torvlobnor IV
        The joke is that it’s generally useless to trophy NATO artillery: the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and the LDNR have nothing to shoot from them, and no one knows how to handle them.

        K155
        KM-1 "Krasnopol" (in some sources - "Krasnopol-155", K155) - modification of the ammunition "Krasnopol" for 155-mm artillery systems M109A2 / A6 (USA), G5, G6 "Rhino" (South Africa), FH77B ( Sweden), TRF1 (France) and others. The complex uses a 155-mm high-explosive guided projectile K155 and a propelling charge VK155 (or standard propelling charges of the 155 mm caliber artillery system used).
        K 155M
        KM-2 "Krasnopol-M2" - 155-mm version of the guided artillery projectile "Krasnopol-M" (according to NATO standards). It includes an adjustable high-explosive fragmentation projectile K155M caliber 155 millimeters, with semi-active homing on a target illuminated by a laser.
        Delivered to India in the 2000s
        The cost of the projectile for export is estimated at 35 thousand USD. For example, for the armed forces of India, 3000 shells and 81 laser designators cost 111,95 million US dollars.
      2. 0
        13 June 2022 00: 07
        How long does it take for a Kamaz driver to start and drive an Amerovsky Mack? Half an hour. So for the gunners - 1/2 hour is also enough to learn and shoot from any barrel wink There was a shooting table in meters, not yards.
  4. -1
    13 May 2022 05: 40
    Projectile M549(A1) in section. FAS Graphics
    Reminds me of a kitchen knife. request
    Shooting from the M777 howitzer. Photo by the US Department of Defense
    And this is arrogance. "Here you are not a plain! Here the climate is different ...." (Vysotsky)Here - shot and 5 minutes. to wash off. Otherwise, the answer, and the pegs of the masset ... recourse For lunch only.
    1. +7
      13 May 2022 07: 36
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Here - shot and 5 minutes. to wash off.

      This gun has 3 minutes to collapse
      1. -1
        13 May 2022 16: 51
        Nobody fights like this
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. -1
    13 May 2022 05: 44
    I wish they could destroy the caravans with these weapons along the road in western Ukraine ... wagon or truck? After all, they will not just explode, but if the reactive charge embedded in them catches fire, then they will fly ... there will be gratitude from the "zapadentsev" to the united forces for the supply of such shells ... "As part of one of the stages of military-technical assistance, the United States plans to transfer 90 M777 howitzers and 184 thousand rounds for them to Ukraine. Australia and Canada will provide a dozen more guns and a large number of shells. Crew training is also underway. By now, the United States has shipped almost all the guns and about two-thirds of the planned amount of ammunition."
    1. +2
      13 May 2022 10: 37
      They won't scatter. The charge only has the strength to accelerate the projectile, not to throw it.
  6. -2
    13 May 2022 05: 59
    Active rockets M549A1 for Ukrainian howitzers
    . It is clear that the new (old) fascist Western "international" has become inflated and stupid to the fullest !!!
    Smash them all and drive them into the state they deserve.
  7. +2
    13 May 2022 06: 10
    the article did not indicate the most important and, in my opinion, the most dangerous feature of American shells, namely their remote radio fuses, which make it possible to detonate shells above the ground, which poses a great threat both to those located in open areas and in trenches ...
  8. +5
    13 May 2022 06: 35
    Hmm .... this needs to be destroyed on the march. Don't let it get to the front line.
  9. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      13 May 2022 08: 34
      bang him.

      for such people, simply death from a bullet is too humane an action. Once, the light has faded and you do not exist. Even with severe intracavitary and amputating MBT from shock, the wounded quickly loses his understanding of reality and does not experience much torment. Iosif Vissarionovich knew how to punish. There is nothing more terrible for a person, when a person rotted in a correctional labor camp for years, degrading from a person into cattle from malnutrition, disease and hard work. That's the way to punish such bad people.
      1. -1
        13 May 2022 08: 52
        I see .... the notes were not removed far.
      2. 0
        13 May 2022 17: 27
        Quote: Ka-52
        bang him.

        for such people, simply death from a bullet is too humane an action. Once, the light has faded and you do not exist. Even with severe intracavitary and amputating MBT from shock, the wounded quickly loses his understanding of reality and does not experience much torment. Iosif Vissarionovich knew how to punish. There is nothing more terrible for a person, when a person rotted in a correctional labor camp for years, degrading from a person into cattle from malnutrition, disease and hard work. That's the way to punish such bad people.

        Oh, don’t tell me, the death penalty, in principle, stopped criminals if they knew that the death penalty would follow. Many agreed to any term, but not execution, and a person is so arranged that he can adapt to any situation, if only to live.
    2. -3
      13 May 2022 09: 26
      And why should he pity them? On the other hand, the same attitude
  10. +4
    13 May 2022 09: 54
    A significant part of the weapons and ammunition will be destroyed under certain circumstances; some won't even make it to the combat zone. More successful examples will not be destroyed, but will become a trophy for the advancing Russian and Republican troops.


    Oh! Favorite word of dreamers will
    The weapon is serious and you should not fantasize - you have to fight it!
    1. -1
      13 May 2022 21: 50
      Quote from Commodore Arctic
      The weapon is serious and you should not fantasize - you have to fight it!

      And here already, the bonnets are off and the routine artillery work on fire targets, on reconnoitered launchers begins. Everything else is lyrics, multiplied by the fact that the Ukrainians don’t even have artillery. with decent fire. With special accuracy. Ours in this respect can only boast of gilding on the Shoiguv temple. scheme ---- detection and that's it. The entire Ukrainian circuit starts bullying // occupying the defense / or attacking targets. They have a reconnaissance aircraft hanging over the battlefield. ..NATO is also not, months before the confrontation, they deployed the so-called control zones in the Romanian and Polish directions, consisting of ground-based air defense systems, but the main radish, of course, is in the strength of the NATO Air Force. The fact is that it is not in vain that the Air Force The United States landed on / airfields pokotsanny according to the exercise plan. Along the way deployment of the game scenario --- /// operation management, secret concentration ---- everything went as planned and as planned. The reader's numbers will tire, but Thunderbolt guarantees that the invasion numbers were more than. reconnaissance and carrier aircraft prr. According to the idea of ​​​​NATO, these guys take out air defense, and then Her Majesty tactical aviation comes into play.
  11. +1
    13 May 2022 10: 16
    The Ukrainian side claims that the first howitzers have already reached the front, and their combat use is beginning.

    Yes, the militias on the news said that 155-mm shells have a different explosion sound and fragments than ours.
    1. 0
      13 May 2022 10: 41
      Shards less. With such thin walls, it is rather a high-explosive projectile. Hull weight reduced for the sake of engine mass. Damage radius reduced.
  12. -1
    13 May 2022 11: 15
    The gun is dangerous, like all artillery of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. What countermeasures do I see?
    1. Establish aerial reconnaissance zones (UAVs) up to 50 km deep.
    2. Total destruction of enemy UAVs. (There is nothing special, there are no derivations of air defense and UAV fighters in the troops)
    3. Increase artillery protection - 2-4 caponiers per gun, increase the armor of self-propelled guns (against fragments)
  13. -1
    13 May 2022 12: 48
    The more sophisticated the weapon, the easier it can be damaged. When fired from the MLRS, fragments will disable them. And no one knows how to fix it.
    From drones, they are also more noticeable, and they cannot change positions themselves.
  14. +2
    13 May 2022 14: 48
    Nothing good. The gun is dangerous, it will spoil for sure. Since this is not the end of supplies, to put it mildly, we need to think about the destruction of infrastructure. First of all, bridges!
  15. +2
    13 May 2022 15: 41
    Timely detection of guns on the march or in positions allows you to strike and disable them. An attack can be preemptive or retaliatory, depending on various factors. It is also necessary to identify storage sites for guns and ammunition. Apparently, all this will not be a difficult task - our army has repeatedly demonstrated its ability to search for and identify enemy targets.

    This will be a daunting task, given the foliage that has appeared on the trees. The RF Armed Forces have few counter-battery radars, the LDNR does not have them at all. In general, counter-battery combat with guns more long-range than yours is a non-trivial task. The M777 folds/unfolds quickly and is quite light on its own.
  16. 0
    13 May 2022 15: 41
    Quote: svp67
    Are there non-lethal guns?

    there is - the tsar cannon in Moscow has not yet killed anyone. But a beautiful infection ....
  17. +6
    13 May 2022 16: 46
    It seems to be a relatively competent article from a technical point of view, but by the end, again, throwing hats is completely inappropriate ...
  18. 0
    13 May 2022 18: 44
    Who can tell if our artillery has APCs in use? I remember looking for a couple of years ago, I found only information about the shell for Pion / Malka, but about the usual 152-mm - no.
  19. -1
    13 May 2022 20: 05
    It remains only to hope for reconnaissance, it is difficult to conduct a counter-battery fight against such howitzers.
    1. -1
      13 May 2022 20: 31
      Quote: cat hippo
      It remains only to hope for reconnaissance, it is difficult to conduct a counter-battery fight against such howitzers.
      For such counter-battery combat use the Tochka-U or Smerch MLRS (but with a guided missile - practically with a cruise missile on the Smerch launcher) - I mean the range of destruction.
      But you need to have accurate intelligence with target coordinates - so that the blow does not fall into the void.
      soldier
      1. 0
        13 May 2022 22: 45
        Quote: cat Rusich
        But you need to have accurate intelligence with the coordinates of the target - so that the blow does not fall into the void.

        It's right. Where will they come from?
  20. -2
    13 May 2022 22: 44
    Howitzers are not Ukrainian. They belong to the USA.
  21. 0
    14 May 2022 03: 00
    Is it beginning to seem that the Russian Ministry of Defense has decided to try out many Western weapons?
    Without full control of the airspace over Ukraine, such weapons will bring heavy losses.
  22. -1
    14 May 2022 06: 12
    another cheer-propaganda, with little bloodshed, in a foreign land ...
  23. +2
    14 May 2022 13: 33
    Reconnaissance means and systems are of decisive importance in the fight against new howitzers. Timely detection of guns on the march or in positions allows you to strike and disable them.


    if the Moscow Region had such means, then these howitzers should not have reached the front, and if they did, then such a MO would be worthless
  24. 0
    14 May 2022 15: 32
    Just yesterday, there were reports of the first M777, which became a trophy of the Russian army.


    This is most likely a fake, it would be so, the Internet would have circled the record with this howitzer, but it is not there yet.
  25. +1
    15 May 2022 10: 32
    Thus, American howitzers and shells handed over to the Ukrainian army find themselves in a difficult situation.

    Any number of weapons supplied by the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which ended up at the front, enhances their ability to conduct combat. Those who talk about “grinding NATO equipment at the front” forget that during the combined arms battle, Russian equipment and military personnel are also ground.
    The leadership of the Russian Federation cannot interfere with deliveries, only moans are heard: “Oh, this is participation in the military confrontation of third countries.”
    Before crossing the Ukrainian border through various secret paths, weapons and equipment are accumulated on the territory of neighboring countries, for example, in Poland.
    But apparently, no one dares to hit these clusters "for warning". Although for so many years we have been told that "the German is a coward, the German will turn away" ..