Military Review

ICBM "Sarmat": the first start and a great future

62

Flight tests of the RS-28 Sarmat, a promising heavy-class intercontinental ballistic missile, have begun. The first launch was recognized as successful, and new ones will take place in the near future. Based on the results of these measures, the missile system will be put into service and will take up combat duty. With the help of the Sarmats, the strategic missile forces will be able to upgrade their arsenals, as well as improve their combat capabilities.


According to official data


According to the Ministry of Defense, the first test launch of the RS-28 product took place on April 20, 2022 at 15:12 Moscow time at one of the sites of the Plesetsk State Test Cosmodrome. Due to the high importance of the event, the leadership of the Ministry of Defense and President Vladimir Putin watched it via video broadcast.

At the command of the combat crew, the experimental ICBM left the silo launcher at the specified time and went flying along the required trajectory. The conditional combat mission of the rocket was to deliver several inert warheads to designated targets at the Kamchatka Kura training ground.

The experimental missile worked in accordance with the program, and the training warheads arrived in the assigned area at the estimated time. The first test launch of the Sarmat was recognized as a complete success. The rocket at all stages of the flight showed the design characteristics. The correctness of the chosen technical and design solutions underlying the project was also shown.


The first launch of the RS-28 rocket launches the program of state tests of the new complex. After its completion, "Sarmat" should be adopted by the Strategic Missile Forces. Details of the upcoming state tests, such as the number of launches, the timing of their implementation, etc., are not given.

At the same time, the Ministry of Defense reports that the missile forces are already preparing for the acceptance and operation of new weapons. So, in the Uzhur formation of the Strategic Missile Forces, serving in the Krasnoyarsk Territory, work has already begun on preparing the infrastructure of one of the regiments for the adoption of "Sarmatians". Having received a promising ICBM, this unit will be able to remove the existing R-36M Voevoda products from duty.

The long-awaited launch


The first test launch of the Sarmat is of great importance for the development of the Strategic Missile Forces and their weapons in the medium and long term. At the same time, it can be called a long-awaited event. The fact is that the preparation for full-fledged flight tests took several years, and their start was repeatedly postponed. This gave cause for concern, but now the necessary measures have been taken, and there are grounds for optimism.

The promising RS-28 missile system was developed by the State Missile Center. V.P. Makeev for ten years. At the end of 2017, the first throw tests of an experimental product took place at the Plesetsk cosmodrome; in the following months, two new launches of this kind were carried out. In March 2018, Sarmat, along with other promising models of strategic designation, became one of the topics of the presidential message.


At that time, it was reported that flight tests of experimental ICBMs would begin in 2019. However, then the plans were revised, and the date of the first launch was shifted. So, in May last year, domestic media reported that flight design and state tests would take place in 2021-22, and by the end of 2022 the first regiment would take up duty.

After all the delays and transfers, the first test launch was completed under the full flight program. At the same time, we are talking about state tests, which will determine the fate of the project. All this shows that the project has moved far enough and got rid of possible problems and difficulties. Accordingly, "Sarmat" can be adopted already this or next year.

Features and capabilities


According to known data, the product RS-28 or 15A28 is a heavy class liquid ICBM, made using modern technologies and components. The missile is built according to a three-stage scheme and has a length of more than 35 m with a diameter of 3 m. The launch weight is up to 210 tons, of which 10 tons are for combat equipment.

Due to new technical solutions and components, it was possible to dramatically increase the firing range in comparison with previous ICBMs. The range of the RS-28 is characterized as "global" and, according to various sources, reaches 15-18 thousand km. This allows you to control almost the entire globe and choose the best flight paths.


It is known that "Sarmat" can carry combat equipment of different configurations. First of all, these are different versions of multiple warheads with individual guidance. In addition, the new missile will become the carrier of the Avangard hypersonic warhead.

Like previous domestic heavy ICBMs, the new RS-28 will only be used with silos. At the same time, the Strategic Missile Forces will do without the construction of new mines. Under the "Sarmatians" the existing launchers of the complexes of the R-36 line are being rebuilt. Accordingly, replacing the existing "Voevod" with the RS-28 will be relatively simple and quick.

Obvious advantages


The Sarmat project is of particular importance for our Strategic Missile Forces. Its successful completion will predetermine the appearance and capabilities of the troops for the next few decades. First of all, it will make it possible to keep heavy-class ICBMs on duty, which have a number of important advantages. The existing products R-36M and UR-100N UTTKh are morally and physically obsolete, and the new RS-28 will take their place.

Cash heavy ICBMs were created in Soviet times and within the framework of the all-Union cooperation of enterprises. Now this approach to the development and production of strategic weapons is unacceptable, and the Sarmat project takes this into account. Unlike its predecessors, the RS-28 missile is made entirely from domestic components and does not depend on foreign suppliers.

While maintaining the required dimensions and weight, higher flight characteristics were obtained. The increase in range to 15-18 thousand km allows you to control most of the planet. It also makes it possible to carry out launches not only along the shortest trajectories, but also along routes that give certain advantages. In particular, it becomes possible to fire around enemy missile defense areas of responsibility.


The most important advantage is the ability to use different options for combat equipment. Saved "traditional" warheads flying along a ballistic trajectory. The combat capabilities of such weapons, supplemented by missile defense breakthrough means, are well known. In addition, the RS-28 will receive a hypersonic gliding warhead with a fundamentally different potential.

In general, the RS-28 / 15A28 ICBM should become a highly efficient and flexible tool capable of solving strategic tasks in one way or another. At the same time, it will be used in parallel with missiles of other classes, and all together these weapons will give the Strategic Missile Forces the widest possibilities in the field of strategic nuclear deterrence.

Weapons of the future


Thus, the product "Sarmat" is of particular importance both for the strategic missile forces and for the country's security. The first test launch of such a missile is an important event, the positive consequences of which will be observed over the next few decades.

However, do not rush things. All the desired results "Sarmat" will give only a few years. So far, the industry and the missile forces have to conduct tests. Then the process of re-equipment of combat units will begin. All these activities take time, but the new missile and its capabilities fully justify such an expectation.
Author:
Photos used:
Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation
62 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. your vsr 66-67
    your vsr 66-67 April 22 2022 04: 40
    +6
    Very good news! Good luck to our scientists, designers, and performers! And let all the enemies think hard before attacking Russia!
    1. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 April 22 2022 05: 02
      0
      Quote: your vsr 66-67
      ... And let all the enemies think hard before attacking Russia!
      What if they don't think? Then this will be the fact that they will very, very much regret that they didn’t think about it in time)))
  2. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx April 22 2022 04: 50
    +4
    An interesting feature of the Sarmat, voiced on the air, is that the missile can pay a visit to a potential "partner" even through the South Pole ... In terms of power, ability to overcome missile defense systems, and speed, it has no equal. One military analyst said that one copy might be enough for the GB and advised Boriska to refrain from threatening Russia.
    From myself I can add that you need to behave decently in any case. There, next in line (after deliveries to the Sarmat troops) are the decommissioning and disposal of the old Voevods ... It is not known how the threats of British officials against Russia can affect this process ... request
    1. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 April 22 2022 05: 05
      0
      Quote: RO 42
      One military analyst said that one copy might be enough for the GB and advised Boriska to refrain from threatening Russia.
      To do this, you need to hit one of the uninhabited islands on the oceans of the planet with kinetic warheads. For demonstration. And what? What's stopping you? Let their pants get very wet and darken on both sides.
      1. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I April 22 2022 06: 33
        +2
        Quote: Tatar 174
        it is necessary to hit one of the uninhabited islands on the oceans of the planet with kinetic warheads

        Daraga! Why are they so happy for free?! It is necessary to announce a competition ... let them pay! Imagine, happy ...: A competition is announced ... a queue of applicants is lined up ... "who will pay more" is selected! This is beneficial for the owners of uninhabited islands! (After the "Sarmatians" visit such an island, the previously uninhabited island will turn into a tourist "mecca"! The whole "world" will rush there! There will not be enough places in local hotels and the tourists who come in large numbers will flood all neighboring islands! Money will flow re...no! By the ocean (!) to the treasury of a previously poor and unknown "island state"! It will become profitable for the islanders to rent out their bungalows to tourists, and go on vacation to Europe themselves!) PS Well. how do you like my business plan? winked
      2. Jacket in stock
        Jacket in stock April 22 2022 07: 23
        +1
        Quote: Tatar 174
        To do this, you need to hit one of the uninhabited islands on the oceans of the planet with kinetic warheads

        And why do you think that from the defeat of these warheads of the Kamchatka Peninsula, their pants get wet less?
        What will fundamentally change?
        1. Tatar 174
          Tatar 174 April 22 2022 08: 00
          +1
          And who will let them go to Kamchatka to see the result???? Here, the main thing is to clearly show the result, otherwise they believe that nothing special, like, happened.
    2. Pavel73
      Pavel73 April 22 2022 05: 14
      +2
      And the Governors - to launch satellites into orbit.
      1. Yngvar
        Yngvar April 22 2022 07: 34
        +2
        I propose for "disposal" a commercial (many countries would agree to pay for this) launch together with a warhead on a vile island in the Atlantic, marked on the map as GB ...
        1. Pavel73
          Pavel73 April 22 2022 08: 21
          +4
          Too early. But if anything, then there is no doubt - these will be the first to receive it. It is they who are the main zakoperschikov all world rubbish.
    3. Login_Off
      Login_Off April 22 2022 05: 30
      +2
      I understand that now it will be easier to get Australia
      1. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I April 22 2022 06: 16
        +1
        Quote: Login_Off
        I understand that now it will be easier to get Australia

        Exactly! fellow Oh, and then we will remember their "Bushmasters" to the kenguryatniks! yes
      2. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx April 22 2022 06: 27
        +4
        Quote: Login_Off
        I understand that now it will be easier to get Australia

        Australia is among the "unfriendly" countries, but the main advantage is overcoming the US missile defense system, built with the condition that our missiles fly through the North Pole.
    4. Sasha1979
      Sasha1979 April 22 2022 05: 30
      +1
      I agree. Disposal is different. According to the method of disposal.
    5. Nafanya from the sofa
      Nafanya from the sofa April 22 2022 06: 25
      +7
      One military analyst said that one copy might be enough for the GB and advised Boriska to refrain from threatening Russia.

      This "analyst" is bad with tests. The "destructive" energy of the "empty" last stage of the rocket is approximately equal to the energy of a tram car dropped from a helicopter. The main destructive power is determined by the warhead and practically does not depend on the type of missile.
      As for "one missile", it would not hurt the "expert" to read about the so-called. "Tsar Bomb" of 58.6 megatons (October 30.10.1961, XNUMX), the most powerful, dropped on the "Novaya Zemlya", while not one island sank.
      1. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx April 22 2022 08: 58
        +1
        Quote: Nafanya from the couch
        As for "one missile", it would not hurt the "expert" to read about the so-called. "Tsar Bomb" of 58.6 megatons (October 30.10.1961, XNUMX), the most powerful, dropped on the "Novaya Zemlya", while not one island sank.

        As for you, you might do well to read:
        2 hours 3 minutes after takeoff at an altitude of 11,5 km above the target level, the bomb was dropped from the carrier aircraft, after which it descended on the main parachute with an area of ​​​​1600 m², the total mass of the parachute system, which included five more pilot chutes, triggered by three "cascades ”, was 800 kg.
        The bomb was detonated barometric fuze 189 seconds after release at 11:33 UTC (08:33 UTC) at an altitude of 4200 m above sea level (4000 m above the target).

        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Царь-бомба
        To the deepest regret, a ground (especially underground) nuclear explosion brings more devastating consequences (example):
        To prepare for the explosion, engineers created a well almost 200 meters deep and lowered a nuclear explosive device weighing 212 kilograms and with a capacity of 104 kilotons into it. The explosion was carried out on June 6, 1962. The power of the explosion turned out to be such that at first a huge dome of sand, stones and earth rose to a height of 90 meters above the surface, which burst in three seconds, scattering more than 11 million tons of soil for many kilometers.
        A crater with a diameter of 390 meters and a depth of 100 meters appeared at the site of the explosion. Today, it is considered the largest crater in the United States created by a nuclear explosion.

        https://hi-news.ru/eto-interesno/kak-vyglyadit-samaya-bolshaya-voronka-ot-yadernogo-vzryva.html
        So before writing:
        Quote: Nafanya from the couch
        The main destructive power is determined by the warhead and practically does not depend on the type of missile.

        Learn:
        https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ядерный_взрыв#Классификация_ядерных_взрывов
        1. Nafanya from the sofa
          Nafanya from the sofa April 22 2022 09: 12
          +2
          Learn:
          https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ядерный_взрыв#Классификация_ядерных_взрывов

          The advice to "learn" something on Wikipedia is cool. Probably it was from this "storehouse of wisdom" that the "pearl" was born that an underground explosion causes more damage than an air one (unless these are buried structures in the immediate vicinity).
          It's good that Wikipedia didn't exist in 1945. Otherwise, the Americans would not have arranged atomic explosions in Hiroshima and Nagasaki at an altitude of 500-600 meters.
          Well, the fact that after 1963 it was possible to test nuclear weapons only underground is true, scientists had nothing more to do.
          1. Ross xnumx
            Ross xnumx April 22 2022 09: 22
            -1
            Quote: Nafanya from the couch
            The advice to "learn" something on Wikipedia is cool.

            No, I'll send you to the secret library... Look at what you have, if you don't like it, try it yourself.
            1. Nafanya from the sofa
              Nafanya from the sofa April 22 2022 09: 45
              +1
              What is - then look, if you don't like it - experience it yourself.

              May I have one request? Please don't give me any more advice.
              If you have a fountain
              shut him up
              (K.Prutkov)
      2. Pilat2009
        Pilat2009 April 22 2022 10: 16
        0
        Quote: Nafanya from the couch
        One military analyst said that one copy might be enough for the GB and advised Boriska to refrain from threatening Russia.

        This "analyst" is bad with tests. The "destructive" energy of the "empty" last stage of the rocket is approximately equal to the energy of a tram car dropped from a helicopter. The main destructive power is determined by the warhead and practically does not depend on the type of missile.
        As for "one missile", it would not hurt the "expert" to read about the so-called. "Tsar Bomb" of 58.6 megatons (October 30.10.1961, XNUMX), the most powerful, dropped on the "Novaya Zemlya", while not one island sank.

        The use of monocharges has long been recognized as ineffective. 20 kt is enough to destroy the city.
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa April 23 2022 00: 26
          +1
          Quote: Pilat2009
          20 kt is enough to destroy the city.

          Cities are also different. For Uryupinsk it may be enough, but for New York it will be "not enough"! (with)
          Therefore - do not be stingy, cut off in full measure, so that everyone has enough! Cities are areal targets... yes
          (and why are these rocket men talking about some kind of "BB breeding areas" ... some strange people .. And yet they are not enough!) bully
    6. Jacket in stock
      Jacket in stock April 22 2022 07: 28
      +3
      Quote: RO 42
      One military analyst said that one copy may be enough for GB

      It was he who remembered Marshal Zhukov's answer to Khrushchev's question in 50.
      Although, maybe, if you choose the right targets, then it will be enough to bring Britain into an incompetent state. But they still have submarines, bases in different countries .... one is not enough.
      Yes, and there is someone to answer for it.
      1. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx April 22 2022 09: 09
        -1
        Quote: Jacket in stock
        Yes, and there is someone to answer for it.

        Who will harness for her (disappeared from the face of the earth)? For what? Experience the consequences in your own skin?
        stop Note that it was not Putin who announced the possibility of inflicting a nuclear strike on the GB for the supply of weapons to Ukraine in order to continue the fighting of the NEONAZISTS with the Russian army and the people's militia of the LDNR.
        This Boriska flashed erudition in the desire to ANSWER.
        And you (if you have an idea about the arsenals of nuclear weapons in GB and the Russian Federation) should understand that GB itself (an island state at a sufficient distance from the mainland) is a more profitable target for Russia for potential destruction than Russia for GB ...
        Remember, no one will ever answer nuclear weapons for a foreign country ... NO-ONE!!!
        Chew snot in the UN Security Council, draw conclusions and EVERYTHING!!!
    7. IVZ
      IVZ April 23 2022 14: 07
      0
      In the days of the USSR, missiles capable of going around the ball and grabbing from the rear were called not intercontinental, but global and were banned by some kind of agreement with the Yankees.
  3. U-58
    U-58 April 22 2022 05: 32
    +3
    God grant that the rocket does not have a "good" future in terms of performing its main tasks, but quietly and calmly rusting in the mines, frightening our sworn friends by the very fact of its existence.
    1. andr327
      andr327 April 22 2022 09: 02
      +6
      But it doesn’t need to rust, it must be serviced and treated kindly, refueled and checked by the duty crews of the Strategic Missile Forces
  4. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. April 22 2022 05: 54
    0
    I am very glad to introduce this weapon into our Armed Forces.
    The power and guaranteed retaliatory strike against the United States with such ammunition does not leave this hegemon a chance to win.
    Russia now has a good sobering club for Biden, Johnson, Scholz and Barrel.
    1. Jacket in stock
      Jacket in stock April 22 2022 07: 08
      +7
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Russia now has a good sobering club

      What wasn't there before?
      1. dzvero
        dzvero April 22 2022 11: 50
        +2
        What wasn't there before?

        SUCH has not been since the time of R-36orb
  5. riwas
    riwas April 22 2022 06: 38
    -3
    In particular, it becomes possible to fire around enemy missile defense areas of responsibility.

    Yes, the adoption of this complex will devalue American missile defense systems.
    1. Jacket in stock
      Jacket in stock April 22 2022 07: 09
      +6
      Quote: riwas
      Yes, the adoption of this complex will devalue American missile defense systems.

      No.
      It will only require additional efforts and expenses from them.
      1. IVZ
        IVZ April 23 2022 14: 11
        0
        And, most importantly, time. And the time we won is the main thing that is needed now.
  6. soul
    soul April 22 2022 06: 57
    -1
    I believe that the product called RS-26 also has a high deterrence potential. Strategic deterrence with him will be more flexible.
    1. Jacket in stock
      Jacket in stock April 22 2022 07: 10
      +1
      Quote: alma
      I believe that a product called RS-26 also has a high deterrent potential.

      Apparently the leadership of Russia does not think so, there is no such product in service with the Russian army.
  7. Ros 56
    Ros 56 April 22 2022 07: 00
    -4
    For the effect, it was necessary for Sarmat to rustle over America, to Biden to say hello.
  8. anclevalico
    anclevalico April 22 2022 08: 39
    +3
    Quote: RO 42
    In terms of power, ability to overcome missile defense systems, speed, it has no equal. request

    This is a ballistic missile, what kind of speed records are we talking about?
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh April 24 2022 23: 04
      -2
      If the ICBM overcomes the 1st space velocity, then
      become an artificial satellite of the Earth.
      So, it's not worth it to overclock ... smile
      For the same reason, the blow through the south pole
      doubtful.
  9. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 April 22 2022 10: 28
    -1
    The number of warheads on Sarmat is limited by the START 3 treaty at the moment. But during the threatened period, everything can change. The Americans will be happy to trample on us to check how much they cost on our first Sarmat.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 23 2022 00: 43
      +2
      Quote: tralflot1832
      The Americans will be happy to trample on us to check how much they cost on our first Sarmat.

      Yes, they would be happy ... But who will let them in!? bully
      1. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 April 23 2022 09: 53
        0
        START 3 implies control from both sides. I would like to be a controller, so you need to study and have the right dad.
  10. Zenn
    Zenn April 22 2022 11: 12
    +1
    I believe the R-36M and UR-100N UTTKH are neither morally nor physically obsolete and are quite suitable for the tasks. The USA and NATO give us enough targets not only for "Sarmat", "Voevod" will be ready to support his younger brother in his hard work for a long time to come.
    The Americans conceptually developed their Minuteman-III in the 60s of the last century, began to produce it in the 70s, so they are outdated in all respects.
    Attempts to develop a new ICBM by the Americans, so far unsuccessful, cover up this failure with the explanation that the Minuteman III is so good that it does not require replacement.
    True, in recent years, out of 16 test launches, only 8 were recognized as successful.
    But this is different!
    1. Evgesha
      Evgesha April 25 2022 02: 04
      0
      Amers have excellent Tridents on SSBNs.
      So, what they have in the mines is enough for them.
      This is our UARL, to put it mildly, not enough, and their deployment areas are limited.
  11. Free wind
    Free wind April 22 2022 12: 03
    -2
    Judging by the enthusiastic cries of the turbopatriots, the Americans huddled under the beds in fear, and do not climb out from the unparalleled Poplars, Sarmatians, Voevods, Satanovs, Poplars - m. Amers have two types of missiles, Trident and Minuteman, and they have enough. And they don’t yell, the whole world is in ruins, and we are in paradise. And yes, they have solid rockets. MO theirs refused at one time from liquid fuel, categorically. The rocket should be ready to launch immediately after the order, with the upcoming holidays.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa April 23 2022 00: 54
      +2
      Quote: Free Wind
      they have solid rockets. MO theirs refused at one time from liquid fuel, categorically. The rocket must be ready to launch immediately after the order,

      1. Have you heard anything about cracks in the mixed CT? about stratification, into fractions, aging, etc. "nonsense" from which rockets explode with firecrackers?
      2. And what about our missiles - "not ready" or what? belay
      Oh yes! they are liquid ... what a nuisance ... And about the fact that right at the factory the components for LRE are "encapsulated" and stored for an arbitrarily long time - of course you have not heard ... It's a pity.
      And then, there are rumors that our R-30 and R-100N utth are also solid-fuel, 4 generations on mixed fuel, and not a bit worse than the American ones ... Damn, that's a nuisance for you ...
      1. Free wind
        Free wind April 23 2022 05: 21
        -1
        Why don't they yell that we'll kill you all?
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa April 23 2022 10: 47
          +1
          Quote: Free Wind
          Why don't they yell that we'll kill you all?

          You just don't know everything. They do it, unlike us, the merciful ones. They silently conduct experiments with biological weapons, even on their own population ... And you think they will take pity on us?
          And at the expense of shouting or not. So we do not shout, but "admonish", appealing to the remnants of their mind, the presence of fear for their existence on this sinful earth...
      2. Free wind
        Free wind April 25 2022 11: 03
        -1
        How long does it take to prepare a rocket for launch? Hour ?, two, ?day.?
        1. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa April 25 2022 18: 17
          +1
          Quote: Free Wind
          How long does it take to prepare a rocket for launch? Hour ?, two, ?day.?

          On our R-21 it took "about 5 minutes" (I would say more precisely, but I can't) But it was an old rocket. The operators monitored the passage of the cyclogram and the "ignition" of the nomograms in time. After pressurizing the tanks, it was necessary to shoot, there was no going back ... Modern SLBMs are much "faster". I won’t say anything about the Strategic Missile Forces, although, of course, I heard something. The Americans say that after the last upgrade, their Minuteman aims for 20 seconds (!), after which you can shoot. To what extent this corresponds to the truth I do not presume to judge. 38 tons is still not 208! So, our suitcases are more powerful than those of the Yankees. It eats up aiming errors. But I do not advise you to check: you can get burned ... bully
      3. valeri.smirn
        valeri.smirn April 28 2022 21: 21
        0
        As a matter of fact, PGRK missiles are all solid fuel ... This is an addition to another post. But in essence this ... Poplar starts up very quickly. I can't be more precise.)
    2. Evgesha
      Evgesha April 25 2022 02: 21
      0
      Dear - you would first pull up the materiel.
      We studied how liquid-fuel rockets differ from those on solid fuel.
      And then push your thoughts.

      And this one, in the Tanya, also has enough of its turbopatriots, who climb under the beds and knock out money in the Senate ... oh yes .. they are still thrown out the windows ...
  12. HefeDMB69
    HefeDMB69 April 22 2022 16: 24
    -1
    What could be new there? The drives are the same. The fire is the same. There were problems with the replacement of the Kharkov control system (according to the press), well, they adjusted it, I suppose, from Sineva or Bulava. And conversations! A simple replacement for sewing on soap, because the sewing was not ours.
  13. svoit
    svoit April 22 2022 17: 10
    +1
    Unfortunately, it is not yet possible to create a solid-propellant rocket of the same power
    1. HefeDMB69
      HefeDMB69 April 22 2022 18: 06
      +1
      What is the ambush. The notorious Mace did not solve the problem of unification in the least. Dead end branch turned out. And Sarmat is the simplest reverse engineering of Voevoda. And it will fly no further than Voyevoda, since the fuel supply is the same, and even with a flat trajectory in general .. Yes, and with fuel a mess, they bought Protons over the hill, because they killed their production. All polymers are gone...
      1. prorab_ak
        prorab_ak April 22 2022 19: 26
        0
        Calm down, father. You don’t need such a harsh truth right away, otherwise the turbopatriots’ pants will start to get wet ... immediately in front and behind, as one of them put it above laughing
      2. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa April 23 2022 01: 17
        +1
        Quote: HefeДМБ69
        Yes, and with fuel a mess, they bought Protons over the hill, because they killed their production.

        In the incomparable 90s, the production of hydrazine was discontinued. But that's history. Production of unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine, or heptyl, is still being carried out in the Russian city of Salavat, a spokesman for Roscosmos said. According to him, Russia does not buy heptyl abroad, as previously reported by the media.
        A plant for the production of hydrazine rocket fuel was built in the Nizhny Novgorod region:
        - The plant was built within the framework of the Federal Target Program "Development, restoration and organization of production of strategic, scarce and import-substituting materials." It is located in the Nizhny Novgorod region, the design capacity is 15 tons per year.
        Somehow, however. hi
        1. HefeDMB69
          HefeDMB69 April 23 2022 10: 30
          -1
          Well, it pleases. Although why heptyl, if Proton is sentenced? And for hundreds of Sarmatians, a heptyl plant is not needed, you can buy it from the Chinese.
  14. Boa kaa
    Boa kaa April 23 2022 00: 38
    +3
    Quote: RO 42
    Remember, no one will ever answer nuclear weapons for a foreign country ... NO-ONE!!!

    Never say never"! (with)
    Are you serious? And even Russia will not be responsible for the application of nuclear weapons in Belarus!?
    You know, this is exactly what the Yankees thought until our GDP brought them to their senses "in word and deed"! But they even had a scenario of unleashing a "limited nuclear war in a theater of operations (in Europe)" with the application of a preventive nuclear weapon in the Republic of Belarus ... And it was played out in a computer version in February 2020 at the SKShI of the US and NATO nuclear planning groups ...
    But everything faded in the twilight of the mind after we announced that we would defend the Republic of Belarus as ourselves and strike retribution at the decision-making centers ...
    (it was then that Ostap realized that they would beat him, and, possibly, kick him ... (c) lol
  15. Dzafdet
    Dzafdet 16 May 2022 10: 14
    0
    Quote: Jacket in stock
    Quote: RO 42
    One military analyst said that one copy may be enough for GB

    It was he who remembered Marshal Zhukov's answer to Khrushchev's question in 50.
    Although, maybe, if you choose the right targets, then it will be enough to bring Britain into an incompetent state. But they still have submarines, bases in different countries .... one is not enough.
    Yes, and there is someone to answer for it.

    Their boats are always at gunpoint. At hour X they will simply be destroyed.
  16. Mitia68
    Mitia68 23 May 2022 14: 35
    0
    Can someone explain why we need two types of silo ICBMs (solid fuel Yars and liquid Sarmat)?
    Is it just to simultaneously keep both the SRC with the Krasnoyarsk plant and MIT with the Votkinsk plant "afloat"?
    Or is there a more reasonable explanation for this?
    1. Russian Patriot
      Russian Patriot 24 May 2022 22: 46
      -1
      I found this article http://makeyev.msk.ru/pub/msys/2007/NikMak_red.html.
      In short, liquid-propellant ICBMs have a larger throw-weight (payload). Solid fuel is easier to operate.
      It so happened historically that the USSR lagged behind the United States in the development of solid-propellant missiles. It was considered and is still considered that such ICBMs are more promising.
      But in the development of mine and submarine-based liquid ballistic missiles, the USSR surpassed the United States.
      And it so happened that there was competition between the two types of fuel.
      And this competition exists today.
      1. Mitia68
        Mitia68 28 May 2022 01: 29
        0
        Thank you.
        It's still not clear, and why do we need 2 different types?
        liquid-propellant ICBMs have a larger throw-weight (payload).

        Sounds doubtful.
        Because the most powerful rocket engines in the world were just solid propellant.
        These were the Space Shuttle's side thrusters, each thrusting over 14 meganewtons.
  17. Russian Patriot
    Russian Patriot 24 May 2022 22: 20
    -1
    The main thing is that the defense industry should cope with the task and be able to re-equip the Strategic Missile Forces in a timely manner.