The term “juvenile justice” (translated from English as “juvenile justice”) is rooted in ancient orgiastic cults that practiced sacrifices. In ancient Rome, juveniles called ritualistic actions legalized by Nero in honor of the deities of youth (the emperor included not only the goddess Juvent, but himself), distinguished by utter licentiousness and the fact that during them "sexual restrictions were abolished."
On the occult-mystical level, juvenile justice is a modern reincarnation of fascist eugenics directed against the fifth commandment of God (“honor your father and your mother, may there be blessing on earth”) for the purpose of destroying a family. It is one of the hidden meanings of globalism, supported by structures like the World Bank. The origins are occult-Satanist organizations, identical to the fact that at one time the Nazis brought to power in Germany, like the Lucifer Trust (Lucis Trust), as well as the ideologues of the new world order, who set themselves the goal of destroying the "extra" part of humanity and acted as aggressive anti-christian force. Here are a few names: a Swiss psychiatrist, one of Hitler’s ideologues, an SS officer and architect of the Nazi racial hygiene program, co-author of sterilization laws, and director of the German eugenics research institute Ernst Rudin; the founder of the modern birth control movement and the International Planned Parenthood Federation, one of the first "sex enlighteners", the author of the bill designed to "stop the overproduction of children", who considered the Slavs to be inferior to reproduction, Margaret Sanger; the former head of the World Bank, the ideologist of the Vietnam War, who used to burn napalm Vietnamese villages with civilians when he was the US Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, the Satanist; another former head of the World Bank, preaching in his books the transformation of a person into a commodity, the elimination of the family and modern forms of cannibalism, Jacques Attali ...
In the “applied” plan, juvenile justice is a ruthless mechanism for changing the basic principles of interaction between the state and the family through the totalitarian suppression of individual freedom, the destruction of the autonomy of relations between children and parents. In many Western countries, the same persons and structures are engaged in promoting juvenile justice, which advocate a reduction in the birth rate, freedom of abortion, the distribution of contraceptives and syringes, drug legalization and retailing, “sexual education” and the promotion of early sexual relations, protection of the interests of homosexuals and lesbians , legalization of “adoption” of children, prevention of toughening of punishments for child pornography, pedophilia and promotion of sexual perversions ...
The result we see. Today in the countries of the West tens of millions of parents do not find anything terrible in the fact that teachers of their children can be homosexuals. That their children do not interfere with kosyachki clogging with marijuana in school toilets, at the same time forcing to create "circles of support for sexual minorities" even in kindergartens and play unnatural roles, dressed in clothes of the opposite sex. That the relevant state bodies, instead of fighting drug addiction and crime, create sophisticated mechanisms of persecution of families for having children. Moreover, they are aimed primarily at the prosecution and destruction of just normal families.
Juvenile justice in the West is not only a special court and a huge bureaucratic army with broad powers, whose officials recruit numerous commissions for minors, guardianship and custody. It is also a system of measures of extrajudicial and excessive intrusion into intra-family matters - up to the removal of the child from the family - under any often unnamed or contrived pretext. The introduction of juvenile justice in the future puts under the "external management" of virtually every family with children.
Any action or inaction of parents in relation to their child can be interpreted by the juvenile body as you please. In fact, it is a tool to control fertility and reduce demographic potential through a preventive invasion of the family under the pretext of protecting children from their parents. It works as follows.
On the one hand, parents and teachers are forbidden to use prohibitive means in raising children. This vigilantly watching so-called. ombudsmen or child rights ombudsmen who collect denunciations of children in their schools in America and Europe to their parents, teachers, and school authorities. In addition to them, special STOP police teams (STOP - State Police Special Tactical Operations team) are on duty in a number of US schools. They are necessary for restoring order in the classroom - so that “mischievous” students unintentionally do not cripple their teacher. The teacher himself, even if the "mischievous" have moved from insults to beating, has no right to apply any measures. The only allowed way to restore order is to call a police team into the classroom.
On the other hand, children are in fact forced to impose an early sexual life, drug use and senseless pastime. Sexualization is an integral part of juvenile technologies (in Sweden they are introduced from kindergarten). Ultimately, it boils down to preaching "freedom of sexual orientation," promoting contraception and childlessness. Anesthesia can be carried out with the help of free distributions of syringes and teaching children the technique of their “hygienic use”. Everyone remembers the August 2011 youth riot in London that caused human casualties. According to the report of the independent commission that conducted the investigation on the orders of the government, the pogroms, in which young people played a key role, were the result of the government’s lack of social policy, which led to poor education of adolescents and a low level of education in public schools, where, according to the report’s authors, 20% students at 11 can barely read and write.
In fact, today in the West, the process of socialization of children is under way in exchange for a high level of comfortable existence of their parents. The criterion for the effectiveness of the work of juvenile justice bodies is the number of children “fully protected” from their parents, that is, taken away from them. The more children the official took away, the more he earns and the faster his career goes up. Children are taken not only from incomplete and dysfunctional families, but also from normal, loving and working parents. The reason becomes anything. For example, any displeasure of a child, a word or even a reproach against parents attending services, can be interpreted by modern inquisitors as “infringement of legal rights and freedoms”. In Great Britain in recent years, the number of seizures of children according to statements by social workers motivating their actions by “emotional abuse” and “risk of emotional harm” has sharply increased, although the meaning of these phrases is unknown.
Protests against forced sexualisation can be interpreted as infringing the right to receive information. A recent example is the scandal in Bavaria, where a girl who did not want to part with her parents was taken away from her parents, who forbade her daughter to attend sexual “education” lessons. History It became public only because the little one, having made sure that the prayers to return her to her mom and dad were useless, attempted suicide.
Refusal of questionable vaccinations or methods of treatment can be interpreted as a lack of concern for the health of the child. An example is the fate of an 12-year-old Texas-born Katie Wernecke taken away from her parents for refusing to irradiate a child with cancer from a child. In the arsenal of Western juveniles there are many reasons, in comparison with which even the reluctance to give a child antibiotics for the treatment of acute respiratory infections or rent debts (an excuse by which hundreds of thousands of children are selected annually) are an “argument”.
According to Trevor Grant, head of the children's social services department of New York (Trevor Grant), “families are being destroyed for absolutely insignificant reasons. If the furniture is broken or in the house is dirty, employees of the social services take the child ... ” Parents are brought up under the article “action to the detriment of the interests of the child” for letting him go for a walk without an adult, for the lack of fruit in the fridge or for lack of pocket money, for having less toys than the neighbors’s children for buying "Unhealthy" kid schoolbag, and even simply because the officials something seemed.
The opinions of the children themselves, no one asks. Often it is impossible to do. As in the case of small Sabrina, daughter of Christopher Slater and Nancy Haigh from Arlington, who was stolen by social workers from parents' home without any investigation at 3's week (!) Age, on the basis that ... the newborn allegedly weighed three hundred grams less, what is needed. Unhappy parents have for several years been trying unsuccessfully to get their child back.
The number of children taken away from parents in Western countries, where juvenile justice is introduced, is staggering. Tens and even hundreds of thousands! Annually! At the core are databases in which a telephone call from an offended child is sufficient and according to the determined number, social workers leave, then letting the selected children walk along the hands of foster families and shelters. For example, in Germany, only in 2009, more than 70 thousands of children were taken from their parents. In France a year earlier, this figure exceeded the bar in 110 of thousands of girls and boys currently living with live mothers and fathers in children's homes and foster families. At the same time, no one is embarrassed that, according to British and American studies, children from foster families (as estimated by pediatricians) are 7-8 times more likely to be abused, and children with government support are 6 times more often than their peers on average on the population (Hobbs G., Hobbs C., Wynne J., Child Abuse Negl. 23.12.1999. pp. 39-52).
In 2000, the French government was presented with an extensive and shocking report by the Inspector General for Social Affairs Pierre Naves and the Inspector General for the Legal Department Bruno Catal on the situation in juvenile courts and social services. The report states: “A colossal number of children are taken away from their parents and placed in shelters and foster families. Judges and social workers constantly violate the law. There is a huge difference between the law and the practice of its application. In the same court, the practice of one judge is different from the practice of another. There is no quality control system for the protection of children and families. Juvenile justice does not show any respect for the family, no care for it. The prosecutor’s office cannot monitor all the cases, as there are too many of them. Social workers and judges have complete, unlimited power over the fate of the child. Social workers often took away children on anonymous phone calls ... the family was in danger. ”
According to statistics, as of the beginning of 2000, more than 60 of millions of children have already been withdrawn from the families of 2-million France. Seven years later, it was stated that 50% of these children were taken away illegally. A typical example is the fate of the actress Natalia Zakharova who emigrated to France in her time. In 1990, the juvenile court of the new homeland deprived it of its maternal rights. The pretext - “Madame Zakharova suffocates the daughter with her motherly love” and wants “to keep too close a relationship with her”! Since then, Masha Zakharova has been transferred from one foster family to another. Her mother went through all the courts, appealed for help to very influential people, including presidents and churches. Only with President N. Sarkozy did Zakharova have 18 personal meetings on the subject of her daughter's return. Prior to this, the question of the return of the girl was raised in the conversations of J. Chirac and V. Putin. A request for family reunion to the Cardinal of France was addressed by Patriarch Alexy II. Nevertheless, the problem has not been solved until now ...
Juvenile justice in the West is a state acting by its own laws, not subject to anyone in the state. The position of the authorities in this matter seems strange only at first glance. The ancient Romans in such cases said: "Look for someone to benefit." Question: why, instead of improving the lives of families, children are taken away from them? Answer: it is very profitable. After all, children are being taken away not only from poor drunkards and sadists.
In Europe, the victims are representatives of all social strata. Even millionaires, like the Italian couple, whose decision to earn extra money in this way from the eldest 20-year-old daughter from her mother's first marriage, took the youngest 7-year-old. Nobody listened to the girl who screamed that she loved her parents and wanted to see her mother. She was simply put in a shelter, and slandered parents were sent to prison.
In America, according to the US National Children's Commission, children are often removed from families “prematurely or unnecessarily” because the federal funding mechanism gives states a “serious financial motive” to select children and not help families to continue their life together (National Commission). New Years Age for Children and Families (Washington, DC: May, 1991. p. 290).
Monthly withdrawn thousands of children not only go to orphanages and shelters. There are many documentaries and videos on the Internet about how juvenile justice in Germany or the United States entrusts children to sadists, pedophiles and drug addicts, and leads children, and their mothers, and fathers to suicide.
A few examples.
At the end of January 2012, a 3-year-old girl died in Berlin. The family in which she was in was observed by the guardianship service. I watched - and did nothing. In the reports, officials recognized the family as “overloaded” with child care. That was until one morning the girl was found dead, with bruises all over her body, choking on vomiting. In 2008, in the West German town of Wuppertal, 5, the year-old girl, Taleia, was taken away from her mother, who sometimes drank her daughter, but loved her very much and was placed in a carefully selected foster family. In the new family they did not drink, but did not like. Talei was beaten. However, the guardianship service ignored messages from the kindergarten that the girl came with bruises, bite marks (dogs) and torn hair tufts. After some time, the adoptive mother drowned Taleyu in a bath of ice water. After a prolonged trial, the adoptive mother was found guilty of the death of the girl. The two guardians who sent the girl to her death were completely acquitted.
The fate of 11-year-old Chantal from Hamburg, who was under the patronage of the guardianship service, is known today to every German. She died at the beginning of 2012, from methadone poisoning, whose pills were found in the bedroom of adoptive parents. Five years earlier, the guardianship service considered the Chantal family to be dangerous for the child: the father took drugs, the mother drank. The girl was removed from the family and placed with adoptive parents, also addicts, but who were in the heroin substitution program with methadone. In the new family, which was supposed to provide a safe and comfortable existence for Chantal, the girl lived like this: 6 man and 3 dogs in the same apartment. She didn’t even have her own bed - but there was access to drugs.
Much about juvenalschikov crimes we still do not know. One of the scary topics is children who come to drug dealers (like Colombians, who have recently adopted Russian children) and black transplantologists who sell human organs. In the United States, over 200 of thousands of patients who are sick for years waiting for donor organs of children and are ready to pay thousands of dollars from 200 for each child “taken apart” are officially registered. In Italy, according to the official recognition of Interior Minister Roberto Maroni in 2011, 1260 "adoptive" kids from Russia only disappeared. The minister suggested that these children ended up in private organ transplant clinics.
In the West, juvenile justice is being introduced into schools and families under the pretext of protection from sadists and pedophiles. At the same time, lobbyists, who manipulate the statistics of children killed and maimed by freaks, stubbornly keep in mind that up to 70% of such crimes are committed by representatives of sexual minorities, whose rights are defended by juveniles. In the US, homosexuals commit more than 33% of all abuses of children. A typical example is the fate of two Russian babies, several years ago taken from an emigrant mother by Norwegian social security grants, who were transferred to local degenerates for “upbringing”. It ended with the rape of a 4-year-old child.
American studies that take into account only officially registered cases show that cases of proven sexual abuse of children in adoptive families occur 4 times more often than the average population. Evidenced by the executive director of the organization “Children's Rights” Marcia Lowry (a supporter of foster families): “I have been engaged in this work for a long time and represented the interests of thousands and thousands of adopted children ... and I practically did not meet either boys or girls who would stay for some time in foster homes and did not suffer any form of sexual abuse - from other children or someone else ”(Dana DiFilipoo Avalanche of Anguish // Philadelphia Daily News, 21.01.2010).
In orphanages in the United States, the level of physical abuse of children exceeds the average level of the population 10 times, sexual - 28 times (mainly due to the violence on each other). (Benedict M., Zuravin S. Factors & Associates; Family Health Care Providers) // Baltimore: Johns Hopkins School of Health Care, 30.06.1992, charts, pp.28,30; Spencer J., Kundsen D. Out of Home Maltreatment: An Analysis of Risk in Various Settings for Children (Vol. 14, 1992, pp. 485-492).
Today, juvenile justice is introduced in most Western countries, but this does not lead to the improvement of human relations, but to the multiplication of public evil. So, in one of the most “advanced” countries in terms of juvenile justice - Germany - today is the lowest birth rate in Europe and about half of all crimes are committed by young people who have not reached the age of majority. Other “developed” countries are not far behind - children from Russia disappear without a trace of thousands, the birth rate is decreasing every year, but crime among young children is increasing, the number of perverts withdrawn from families is increasing.