Gun-howitzers D-20 in the Ukrainian army. The threat and the fight against it

50

Ukrainian gun D-20 during exercises, 2017. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

152-mm D-20 howitzer guns have been spotted in Ukraine again. Guns of the old Soviet production are used by the Ukrainian army in several sectors of the front. With their help, strikes are made against distant targets, incl. objects of civil infrastructure, Donbass and Ukrainian. However, the use of such howitzer guns is associated with a number of problems and has limited results. So, they are morally and physically obsolete, and their number is small and constantly decreasing due to Russian strikes.

Soviet heritage


The promising gun-howitzer D-20 (GRAU index 52-P-546) was developed in the late forties by the Sverdlovsk OKB-9 as a replacement for the existing ML-20 gun. In the early fifties, the new D-20 coped with all the tests, entered service and went into series. In the future, mass production made it possible to re-equip the Soviet units, create stocks and start export deliveries.



As a result of the collapse of the USSR and the division of the Soviet army, significant numbers of D-20 guns went to independent states, incl. Ukraine. According to known data, at the beginning of the nineties, the Ukrainian army had several hundred of these guns. The available stocks of artillery made it possible to continue its operation and conduct exercises. In addition, guns, incl. D-20 products were sold to third countries. A number of products were stored or turned into monuments.


The weapon is in combat position. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

According to The Military Balance, by 2013-14. At least 215 D-20 howitzer guns remained in service with Ukraine. The condition of such an arsenal and the number of guns ready for use remained unknown. At the same time, there was every reason to believe that the state of armaments leaves much to be desired.

These assumptions were indirectly confirmed by the published materials. So, in 2013, the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense showed the exercises of the 55th artillery brigade, in which only one D-20 battery consisting of six guns was involved. Later, after the Crimean events, they showed the same battery, but with four guns.

In private, military personnel published photographs of D-20 guns from other units. This equipment had a sad appearance and probably the same technical condition. Apparently, the guns had not fired for a long time and did not see proper maintenance. On various details, incl. critical, the paint was missing, and the bare metal was covered in rust. Also, not only external defects could be present.


Shot. Photo by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine

Guns for war


At the end of spring 2014, D-20 howitzers were brought to the so-called. anti-terrorist operation. The already well-known four-gun battery, along with other units with other weapons, went to the area between the Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics. The Ukrainian army used the D-20 in this direction for several months, but already in August, the guns became a trophy for the militia from the DPR.

In the same period, measures began to restore and return to service gun-howitzers from storage. Re-preservation and restoration was carried out by various army workshops. As reported, the restored D-20s were transferred to existing and newly formed units and sent to fight in the Donbass. In the future, these processes continued, but over time, their pace decreased.

The restored guns, as before, were used to shell the positions of the militia and to attack civilian targets. At the same time, Ukrainian artillerymen faced a number of problems and risks. So, old guns, despite recent repairs, quickly broke down, and their restoration required time and effort.


Destroyed D-20, August 2014. Photo by Lostarmour.info

The enemy, represented by the LPR and the DPR, quickly learned how to counter-battery and often began retaliatory shelling. In addition, as the fighting continued, the Ukrainian army abandoned positions along with guns, and a number of D-20s again changed hands.

In recent years, open clashes have virtually ceased, and the intensity of shelling has fallen. Nevertheless, even in such a situation, the Ukrainian side regularly used 152 mm artillery against the settlements of Donbass. Probably, D-20 howitzer guns were also used in the shelling.

As they were used in combat, the guns worked out their resource and / or broke down, were destroyed by the enemy or were given to him as trophies. As a result of all these events, the total number of D-20s in Ukraine has noticeably decreased. The Military Balance reference books in recent years indicate the presence of only 130 of these guns.

In the process of demilitarization


In February 2022, Ukraine intensified shelling of the DNR and LNR. Arrivals of 152 mm caliber shells were regularly recorded, which could have been fired from D-20 howitzer guns. However, it was not possible to shell the republics with impunity - Russia launched an operation to protect them and demilitarize Ukraine.


A militiaman with a trophy, August 2014. The unsatisfactory condition of the weapon is visible. Photo Lostarmour.info

As part of the current Special Operation, the Russian army, using existing reconnaissance systems and firepower, finds and destroys various enemy targets, incl. artillery positions. In particular, during March, official and unofficial sources published photos and videos of the destruction of Ukrainian D-20 guns. There are also reports of guns of this type abandoned during the retreat.

The exact number of destroyed D-20s is not yet known. At the same time, there is an obvious tendency to its constant decrease "for natural reasons" and as a result of the strikes of the armies of Russia and the young republics. It is quite possible that by the time the Special Operation is completed, the Ukrainian army will be left without D-20 howitzer guns and some other types of weapons.

Technical potential


The D-20 product is a 152 mm towed howitzer gun designed to engage a wide range of targets directly at the front line or at the tactical depth of defense. Calculation of the gun - 8 people. The gun was developed in the middle of the last century, but a number of new solutions were used in its design, due to which it still retains a certain combat and operational potential.

Gun-howitzers D-20 in the Ukrainian army. The threat and the fight against it

The D-20 gun and the truck are the targets for the next strike. Frame from video from Russian UAV

The basis of the artillery system is a rifled barrel of 152,4 mm caliber, 27,2 klb long. The barrel is equipped with a developed two-chamber active type muzzle brake. The breech has a semi-automatic vertical wedge bolt. The barrel is equipped with recoil devices with a hydraulic recoil brake and a hydropneumatic knurler.

For the D-20, a wheeled carriage of a traditional design was developed, consisting of two machines. The lower machine is equipped with a wheel drive, lowered front support and sliding beds. The upper one has gun mounts, guidance mechanisms and shield cover. The gun carriage provides horizontal aiming within a 58° wide sector and vertical guidance from -5° to +45°.

The D-20 uses separate case-loading shots with various types of projectiles. The main one is high-explosive fragmentation. There are also cumulative fragmentation, incendiary, smoke, etc. The gun is compatible with the modern Krasnopol guided munition. Like other Soviet-designed 152-mm systems, it could use nuclear weapons.


A couple of artillery systems seconds before the defeat. Frame from video from Russian UAV

The metal shell of the shot contains a variable charge. With a maximum charge, a high-explosive fragmentation projectile is sent to 17,2 km. Active-reactive firing range - up to 24 km.

The mass of the D-20 gun-howitzer exceeds 5,6 tons. Its movement across the battlefield or its transfer along the roads is provided by a tractor in the form of a car with the appropriate characteristics. The speed of transportation on the highway is up to 60 km / h.

Fight against danger


The 152 mm D-20 howitzer gun was developed and put into production 70 years ago. Guns of this type are morally and physically obsolete, which is why they are inferior to newer and more advanced models in all respects. Nevertheless, the guns of the middle of the last century are quite capable of sending shells into a given square and still pose a certain danger that must be dealt with.

It is obvious that the suppression of Ukrainian artillery, incl. guns D-20, will continue. Using a variety of means, our army will continue to identify and hit the positions of Ukrainian artillery. As the practice of recent years shows, it was guns of various types that posed the main threat to the Donbass and its inhabitants. And their destruction is now becoming one of the main ways to protect the LPR and DPR.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    April 6 2022 05: 21
    A very reliable weapon, the resource seems to be 1000 shots, in the Caucasus there were cases when it was tripled, but this was in the self-propelled version 2s3 and the trunks were new.
    1. 0
      27 June 2022 15: 18
      Shot with a full charge no more than 700 shots. further it is already dangerous or 1000 shots with a reduced charge there is a table according to which wear is filled in the gun card. You have never seen how the barrel breaks, the recoiler breaks, or the muzzle brake of the gun's compensator cuts off due to negligent command that simply forgot to fill out the cards correctly. For which the senior officer of the batteries of the neighboring art division sat down.
  2. +4
    April 6 2022 06: 11
    Destroyed D-20, August 2014. Photo by Lostarmour.info

    What is it like that? Exact hit (no funnel visible)? Or did the breech explode when fired?
    1. 0
      27 June 2022 15: 29
      The breech cannot break breaks the barrel. breakage of the knurler or recoiler, most likely the recoiler is out of order, and the recoiler with an impulse, without the resistance of the recoiler, returned the barrel back, which dragged the gun carriage, is it a joke or 8 tons of barrel weight. The principle of operation is the same as in the Kayaba gas-oil shock absorbers. in shock absorbers, all this is implemented in one cylinder, and in the D20 howitzer in two different cylinders.
  3. +12
    April 6 2022 06: 22
    Those who ordered, designed, and produced these guns, even in a nightmare, could not imagine that their offspring would fire at Donetsk and Luhansk.
  4. +5
    April 6 2022 06: 33
    If my memory serves me, the Armed Forces of Ukraine also have 152-mm D1 howitzers in the arsenal ... we are waiting for the story!
    1. +3
      April 6 2022 13: 38
      Artillery "is the god of war" and it doesn't matter if it's D-20 or D-1, the main thing is in which hands the weapon is ..... soldier
      1. +1
        April 7 2022 01: 56
        it doesn’t matter if it’s D-20 or D-1, the main thing is in what hands the weapon is ....
        Quite right! And the D-20 is quite a normal weapon! good
      2. +1
        27 June 2022 15: 33
        M-30 is a good gun in Central Asia and Azerbaijan is still in service
  5. +3
    April 6 2022 06: 36
    I thought we have more developed satellite and air reconnaissance in order to determine the location of enemy military equipment and report coordinates for its destruction. Everything is kind of old fashioned.
    1. +1
      April 6 2022 11: 35
      The time of flight of the satellites is known. From aviation to drive into any barn. Or just disguise. I am generally silent about urban development. Yes, any canopy on the market and aviation satellites will be blind. One thing remains. "The old fashioned way."
      The D-20 gun and the truck are the targets for the next strike. Frame from video from Russian UAV
      1. +6
        April 6 2022 15: 04
        Quote: Monar
        The time of flight of the satellites is known. From aviation to drive into any barn. Or just disguise. I am generally silent about urban development. Yes, any canopy on the market and aviation satellites will be blind. One thing remains. "The old fashioned way."
        The D-20 gun and the truck are the targets for the next strike. Frame from video from Russian UAV


        There are aircraft with radar.
        Which distinguish between ground targets of the class truck, infantry fighting vehicle, tank at distances from 100 and even up to 250 km.
        Which cost more than AWACS, and the crew is one and a half times more.
        And they are noticeably more expensive.
        But the adversary has them.
        At America.
        Since 1988.
        They are called E-8A.
        Equipped with multi-mode side-looking radar APY-3.
        Data links provide information to ground troops in near real time. The radar recognizes and tracks the position and movement of all ground assets, and also performs other functions. It recognizes and classifies wheeled and tracked vehicles in all weather conditions.
        A system from a synthetic aperture radar with a target indicator set acquires a photographic quality image or displays selected geographic areas. The radar system is designed to use FPV technology to provide a high-resolution image of enemy positions viewed from a long distance, which allows the aircraft to be in its own airspace and far from the front line.
        The adversary has 17 of these.
        17.


        And we still have a pair of Tu-214Rs, which are still being brought to mind, because they cannot go beyond the parameters that were laid down. That is, completely raw.
        And our Defense Ministry refuses to buy such raw aircraft.

        And they were needed 10 years ago.
        And now, it is the absence of such aircraft (where they are needed like air, in such a conflict - they simply do not exist) - it costs hundreds of lives to our soldiers.
        Such aircraft can completely change the course of warfare.
        1. -4
          April 6 2022 20: 31
          Now imagine that Ukraine still has these planes ... This is for a war with various pygmies. Although I admit, there is a sense in them. Probably incompetent sit in the General Staff. Do we need aircraft carriers now?
          1. +5
            April 6 2022 20: 43
            Quote: Alex Nevs
            Now imagine that Ukraine still has these planes ... This is for a war with various pygmies. Although I admit, there is a sense in them. Probably incompetent sit in the General Staff. Do we need aircraft carriers now?


            Ukrov has them. American.
            For now they fly there constantly, and satellites of all NATO countries and their allies fly there constantly - and they send information to the Ukrainian General Staff in real time. And the Ukrainian General Staff = headquarters has an order of magnitude more operational information than the Russian General Staff.
            And that is why we see what is really happening.

            And I say in plain text that incompetent people sit in the General Staff.
            I've been talking for almost 10 years now.
            Modern wars have long passed into the category of computer games.
            Network-centricity came from there.
            And if not gamers sit in the General Staff, they will always lose.
            For they do not understand the principles of modern network-centricity.
            I've been yelling about this for 10 years already!!!
            On that website.
            Under three different nicknames. banned at different times.
            1. -4
              April 7 2022 00: 25
              Quote: SovAr238A
              And I say in plain text that incompetent people sit in the General Staff.
              I've been talking for almost 10 years now.

              Is there one thing I don't understand? Why haven't you removed Gerasimom yet?
              1. +5
                April 10 2022 23: 00
                Is there really anything to object to? The General Staff turned the country around at the level of the Winter War, but with much worse prospects.
                Now let’s see how they decide with the environment in the Donbass, literally every dog ​​in the world is talking about this operation, and I won’t be surprised if the Ukrainians surprise us, there’s no surprise.
                1. -1
                  April 10 2022 23: 32
                  Quote: timokhin-aa
                  Is there really anything to object to? The General Staff turned the country around at the level of the Winter War, but with much worse prospects.
                  Now let’s see how they decide with the environment in the Donbass, literally every dog ​​in the world is talking about this operation, and I won’t be surprised if the Ukrainians surprise us, there’s no surprise.

                  Read the answer at the top (branch).
                  1. +2
                    April 11 2022 11: 34
                    It's all game and congress from the topic. The General Staff screwed up at the level of situation assessment and planning. And there is no guarantee that they succeeded.
            2. 0
              April 7 2022 17: 03
              Ukrov has them. American.
              For now they fly there constantly, and satellites of all NATO countries and their allies fly there constantly - and they send information to the Ukrainian General Staff in real time. And the Ukrainian General Staff = headquarters has an order of magnitude more operational information than the Russian General Staff.
              Dear comrades, he is right! For all 100%. this is exactly what happens, because Ukraine without the support of the NATO bloc would have been "blown away" long ago.
            3. 0
              April 7 2022 17: 21
              Under three different nicknames. banned at different times.
              "Nihas", "Postman"?) recourse
              1. +1
                23 May 2022 09: 28
                Quote: ArbagaSt
                Under three different nicknames. banned at different times.
                "Nihas", "Postman"?) recourse

                no..
                Mav1971, ZVO
        2. 0
          19 May 2022 15: 20
          Great comment. And specific. Glad to see an expert in my field. The subjects of RV and A are close to me. Therefore, I read about artillery. And laugh, especially from the comments.
        3. 0
          27 June 2022 15: 41
          You are directly aware that the adversary and we are doing with intelligence. all these wunder waffles are good in a war without normal air defense with weak opposition from the enemy. when meeting with an enemy more serious than Yugoslavia, Iraq and Libya, they land well in the form of scrap metal. These machines are designed for peacetime to nightmare their opponents by flying along the border and that's it.
      2. +1
        April 6 2022 17: 17
        By aviation, I also meant drones, they are not so big and loud and can patrol over a certain square for days.
  6. +4
    April 6 2022 09: 10
    I don’t hear about the work of counter-battery complexes, there was a radar Zoo-1.
    https://topwar.ru/7376-kontrbatareynaya-rls-zoopark-1.html
    And maybe acoustic or
    1. +3
      April 6 2022 11: 30
      And maybe acoustic or

      Пенициллин
      https://topwar.ru/148924-kompleks-zvukoteplovoj-artillerijskoj-razvedki-1b75-penicillin.html
    2. +1
      April 6 2022 13: 24
      The Defense Ministry finances the design and production of weapons. But a lot is up for sale. Apparently, there are a lot of new products, but where it is in OUR troops is not clear. And why are there so few shells?
    3. 0
      27 June 2022 15: 48
      I also ask this question why the anti-battery systems on our side are nowhere to be seen. They are very good in 2001 in Totskoye, they showed themselves well in the exercises, they accurately gave out the coordinates of our positions. I saw only the wrecked complexes produced by NATO countries after our art raids, and there was another video about there that as soon as Mikola was turned on, the X-31 anti-radar version visited them.
  7. +9
    April 6 2022 09: 18
    The author forgot to add about shells of the Sh type (shrapnel) and fragmentation (cassette). In Germany, our brigade was also armed with these guns (two heavy howitzer divisions, 6 eight-gun batteries). All guns except for one were 81g and newer. Tractors Kamaz and Krazy. As far as I heard, the brigade was taken to Ukraine and disbanded there. So that our guns are now fighting there, it's a pity.
  8. -4
    April 6 2022 11: 16
    How many times have we been told that towed guns have no place on the modern battlefield.
    or is it just the Russians who can organize a modern battlefield to destroy such guns right away?
    1. +2
      April 6 2022 11: 31
      Why don’t they “tell” us ... But the gun fights beautifully. Maybe the problem is not in him, but in the storytellers?
      1. +2
        April 6 2022 12: 17
        Quote: stankow
        Why don’t they “tell” us ... But the gun fights beautifully. Maybe the problem is not in him, but in the storytellers?

        Or is the problem that the Russian army does not know how to fight in a modern war?
        When drones over the field immediately transmit where they shot from, when yes, artillery radar detects enemy positions and a strike immediately follows there. When aircraft hangs over the battlefield, preventing the enemy from using such weapons.
        1. +2
          April 6 2022 13: 38
          why did you decide that our army does not know how to fight? Where does the information come from that towed artillery is useless. It all depends on the level of training of commanders and personnel. The preparation and firing time is 3-5 minutes, 3 minutes after the opening of fire, you must already get out of the position, otherwise it may fly in response. Ours in the GSVG were very well prepared and managed to do all this. And probably almost half of the artillery officers in the USSR were from Ukraine. Odessa, Sumy and Khmelnitsky schools. Others are Kolomna, Leningrad and Tbilisi.
          1. -3
            April 6 2022 16: 04
            What's the point of risking the crew of a howitzer with a short firing range and heavy ammunition? The probability of falling under counter-battery fire is very high. Then use Msta-B or Hyacinth-B, there is still less chance that they will get back fire.
            D-20 is already in the most extreme case.
          2. +1
            April 7 2022 01: 12
            3 minutes to get out...
            This is eternity!!!
            I remember when, in my youth, they began to study the MT-12 and D-30 .. I couldn’t even understand the place of towed artillery on the battlefield !!! Really playing simulators of planes, helicopters and tanks, you begin to understand that towed artillery is a tasty target !! who can't run away and can't fight back!!!! It all depends on the current of her environment, that is, whether there is a cover nearby !!!
            I remember (1994)) in terms of tactics, the first task was to defend against the advancing infantry battalion of the US Army, and there I had in command:
            1. motorized rifle company on the BMP-2
            2.mortar battery 120mm
            3.tank platoon t-72
            so the lieutenant colonel looked at my decision and freaked out and then began to go bankrupt !!!
            Like what the hell do I keep tanks in the rear. Like forward them, let's go to the front.
            To my answer - so there they are kind of smart, followed by the answer - they will give more !!!
            I played active defense and the tanks were the mobile reserve.
            After that, it became clear that our lieutenant colonel was not fucking up in modern combat ... theorists stuck at the level of the 1970s.
            Therefore, in modern combat, the main thing is mobility !!!!
            If you have complete superiority over the enemy, then you can use towed howitzers.
            And then, you read about the losses - so there are losses among the gunners !!!!
            Well, how do you lose guys like that, who don’t seem to be on the front?!?!?!?
          3. 0
            April 10 2022 23: 01
            The Americans knock out all the firing artillery of the enemy within the range of the actual fire of their artillery in a couple of hours.
            1. 0
              22 May 2022 22: 10
              Meaning "enemy artillery" 82-mm mortars.
  9. +1
    April 6 2022 14: 57
    At least 215 D-20 howitzer guns remained in service with Ukraine.

    For an assessment, it is worth asking - in what years the old Russian "unicorn" was used, in the presence of breech-loading artillery.
    1. +3
      April 7 2022 00: 33
      Quote: Ermak_Timofeich

      For an assessment, it is worth asking - in what years the old Russian "unicorn" was used, in the presence of breech-loading artillery.
      Howitzer "Unicorn" was in service with the RIA until 1863g.
      Two-pound Unicorns were removed from units for the Patriotic War of 1812.
      10, 18, 20 pounds Unicorns were used until the Crimean War of 1853-56.
      Stored in warehouses as a mobile reserve until 1906g when "Unicorns" was finally written off.
      hi
      1. 0
        April 7 2022 14: 41
        Thank you, dear cat Rusichall right
    2. 0
      27 June 2022 15: 53
      For the last time near Moscow in 41, serfs fired cannons against light armored vehicles during the Crimean War. direct fire.
  10. +3
    April 6 2022 17: 54
    Quote: Vladimir 290
    It all depends on the level of training of commanders and personnel. The preparation and firing time is 3-5 minutes, 3 minutes after the opening of fire, you must already get out of the position, otherwise it may fly in response.

    I don’t know the regulations, but in the presence of drones, artillery must be destroyed. You understand that gun crews are vulnerable. Actually, this is one of the factors why self-propelled guns should replace towed guns.
    As for college graduates, do you think that 50-year-old men are in charge of the calculations? I strongly doubt something.
    1. ada
      0
      April 7 2022 17: 49
      [quote = certero] [quote = vladimir 290] It all depends on .... Actually, this is one of the factors why self-propelled guns should replace towed guns.
      ....[/quote]
      For a given period of time, the development of artillery systems is impossible. The type and type of systems used is highly dependent on the local conditions of the area of ​​application, methods and means of their delivery. For example, mountainous terrain, the possibility of using only pack-and-carry transport or carrying by crew, landing craft of low carrying capacity or displacement, etc. At the same time, an important factor is the need for fuel and lubricants.
      That is, everything remains for the time being approximately as it is, up to equipping weapons on new physical principles or its elements.
  11. 0
    April 7 2022 21: 49
    Quote: certero
    How many times have we been told that towed guns have no place on the modern battlefield.

    On the modern one - yes, it’s not the place, they won’t even have time to turn around, not only they will have time to fire at least one shot, but where did you see modern combat here?
  12. 0
    April 8 2022 17: 43
    In the photo, the Ukrainian gunner is standing behind the breech of the gun, and at one time I was taught to pull the trigger cord, standing on the side.
  13. 0
    16 May 2022 08: 17
    How much has been written about the fact that towed artillery cannot exist in modern warfare.
  14. 0
    22 May 2022 10: 26
    It is quite possible that by the time the Special Operation is completed, the Ukrainian army will be left without D-20 howitzer guns and some other types of weapons.

    It would be nice if she also remained without herself)
  15. 0
    22 May 2022 10: 41
    Just starting to read the article, I realized who the author is, then everything is clear. Endless chewing of the same facts. Oil, etc. By the way, the militia actively uses d 20. 20 can shoot with a red field. When aiming from a drone, a very formidable force.
  16. 0
    22 May 2022 22: 17
    More precisely, a howitzer-gun. To beat a real howitzer, there is not enough coal vert. guidance - max. 45 degrees. Accordingly, there is no mortar firing mode.
  17. 0
    9 June 2022 10: 44
    After the war, design engineers had experience and information from front-line officers and not only understood what was needed, but it turns out they made a promising weapon.