In two operations: combat use of Russian loitering ammunition

48

Ammunition "Kub-BLA" on the launcher

In recent years, the Russian defense industry has developed several unmanned aerial vehicles of the “loitering ammunition” class. Soon it weapon was tested by the army, received high marks and entered the troops. The ammunition showed its capabilities and potential in Syria, and now they are confirming them as part of the Special Operation in Ukraine.

New designs


The topic of loitering ammunition (AP) has not been worked out in our country for a long time - despite the notable successes of the unmanned industry as a whole and the emergence of foreign projects of this kind. However, later the situation changed, and in 2019 Zala Aero presented two such UAVs at once, and also announced new developments based on them.



Ammunition "Kub-BLA" and "Lancet" coped with factory tests and were presented to the Ministry of Defense, after which a new stage of testing began. The products received fairly high marks, although there were some comments and suggestions for further development. Based on the results of these events, mass production was launched, and deliveries to the troops also started.


Exhibition "Lancet-3"

To date, Zala Aero has managed to develop and bring, at least to testing, a whole line of BBs. It includes products "Cube-UAV", "Lancet-1" and "Lancet-3" with different characteristics and capabilities. New samples are also being developed on the basis of existing ones.

Combat application


Just a few months after the first show, in 2019 the party drones "Cube-UAV" was delivered to Syria for experimental military operation in a real conflict of low intensity. The following year, the army received a batch of Lancet-3 products to conduct similar tests. A few weeks ago, in mid-February, the Russian press reported on the use of another AP of the Lancet family in the Syrian operation.

Some details of the Syrian weapons tests are known. Officials and unnamed sources reported the use of several dozen loitering ammunition. They were used to destroy stationary and mobile targets of various kinds - various buildings, fortifications, vehicles, etc.

In two operations: combat use of Russian loitering ammunition

Combat use of an AP of unknown type. The circle marks the device flying up to the target

Video recordings of the combat use of new ammunition were also shown. Filming from reconnaissance UAVs of objective control made it possible to evaluate the features of the use and capabilities of such warheads. In particular, hits on stationary targets and successful "chases" of moving ones were clearly demonstrated. One of the recordings shows how the UAV flies under a canopy and hits objects under it.

Back at the end of February, the first reports appeared about the use of Russian BBs as part of the Special Military Operation in Ukraine. In particular, various photographs and videos were published in various sources. However, there were no official data on this subject for some time, and the question remained open.

Confirmation was received on March 19 - the Ministry of Defense published a video with several episodes of the use of BB. Filming from a reconnaissance UAV shows how the ammunition flies up to the intended ground target and undermines it. Both shown episodes demonstrate the exact defeat of objects in urban areas without misses and collateral damage.


Target hit

Details of the combat use of Russian BBs have not yet been given. The number of launches and targets hit, the success of breaking through the remaining air defenses, etc. is unknown. At the same time, it can be assumed that the new weapon is used in fairly large quantities and complements other shock systems. At the same time, not everything goes smoothly - there are known cases of failures, which, however, should not seriously affect the overall efficiency and statistics.

Material part


The Russian army is currently armed with at least three types of loitering ammunition. First of all, this is the very first sample from Zala Aero - "Cube UAV". Such an aircraft is a plastic "tailless" 950 mm long with a wingspan of 1,2 m. It is equipped with an electric motor with a pusher propeller and an autopilot with satellite homing or an optical system.

"Cube-UAV" develops speed up to 130 km/h and can stay in the air for up to half an hour. The designated target is attacked from a dive; its defeat provides a 3-kg warhead. The power of the charge is sufficient to deal with unprotected equipment, buildings and manpower.


Hit another target

The product "Lancet-1" is built according to a different aerodynamic configuration and has an elongated fuselage with two sets of X-shaped planes. The takeoff weight of such a warhead is only 5 kg, of which 1 kg falls on warheads. Despite its small dimensions, the Lancet-1 is equipped with a fairly advanced control and guidance system, built using an optoelectronic unit and satellite navigation.

With the help of an electric motor with a pusher propeller, the Lancet-1 is capable of speeds up to 110 km / h. The battery charge is enough for a flight of 30 minutes. followed by a fall on the target.

"Lancet-3" is built according to the same scheme, but differs in increased size and weight. Other equipment was also used and combat characteristics were improved. The non-standard UAV weighs 12 kg and carries a warhead weighing 3 kg. Flight characteristics generally remained at the same level, but the flight duration increased to 40 minutes.

Combat capabilities


All loitering ammunition, including the domestic "Cube" and "Lancet", have similar principles of operation. Such a product starts from the launcher and is sent to the intended target area, where it begins to search for it. The detected target is taken for tracking, after which the UAV falls on it and undermines the standard warhead.


Domestic warheads are intended to destroy various ground and surface targets. High-explosive fragmentation warheads weighing up to 3 kg ensure confident destruction of various objects, up to light armored vehicles. Targets with more powerful protection are dealt certain damage, incl. excluding further tasks.

During the tests, the Lancet devices also showed the fundamental possibility of working in the “air mining” mode. In this case, the loitering product is looking for enemy aircraft, and when it is detected, it attacks them. This mode is intended to combat enemy helicopters and UAVs.

BBs of the Lancet family, equipped with optoelectronic systems, can be used as aerial reconnaissance means - in addition to full-fledged reconnaissance or reconnaissance-strike UAVs. However, the simplified composition of the optics limits their ability to provide target designation to other weapons.


With all this, "Cube-UAV" and "Lancet-1/3" are small in size and weight. Transportation / carrying of these complexes and their preparation for use are not associated with any difficulties. However, weight reduction limits the flight characteristics and parameters of the warhead.

Practical results


Loitering munitions have a number of strengths, but at the same time face objective limitations. They are easy to transport and use, and also show fairly high combat performance. At the same time, the existing warheads, in terms of flight and other characteristics, are inferior to “traditional” UAVs with reconnaissance and strike capabilities.

Nevertheless, in general, APs are a promising and interesting tool for solving various combat missions. In various situations, they are quite capable of complementing other ground-based and air-based weapons with different guidance principles, greater power, etc. As a result, a full-fledged multi-component weapon system is being created, which is distinguished by wide combat capabilities and high flexibility of use.

Thus, in recent years, another important tool has appeared at the disposal of our army for part of the combat missions. The benefits of "Cubes" and "Lancets" have already been shown at test sites and in a real Syrian operation. Now they are participating in another Special Operation and successfully increasing their combat score.
  • Ryabov Kirill
  • Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Zala Aero
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

48 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    30 March 2022 03: 29
    Nevertheless, in general, APs are a promising and interesting tool for solving various combat missions.

    Actually, what is so difficult about these BBs? The same UAV. From a complex and expensive guidance system.
    I don’t know how they were used during the operation in / in Ukraine, but in Syria the MTR did a good job with them. Worked out both the design and tactics of use. For the destruction of point unarmored targets, this is for now. Over time, developments will go to destroy armored targets, the charge power will be increased and they will approach and even overtake, especially at a price, such types of ammunition as a guided artillery shell.
    1. +15
      30 March 2022 04: 02
      there are fallen Cub-UAVs in Kuev, they were used there (why the second question fell, maybe the communication channel was intercepted or even extinguished, the skakuas have electronic warfare), but there is no evidence of the use of Lancets, well, the Cub-UAV was not seen in the east, but here where they are most needed.
      and they need a lot, a lot, and taking into account air supremacy and the handed-down air defense, the Lancets would have taken out more or less heavier than a machine gun. Eagles with a thermal imager (if you take them in bulk) or Outposts (those are heavier, more expensive and, accordingly, there will be fewer of them, but you can put optics with more impressive teplokami on them) well, new Orions and what else is there.
      round-the-clock monitoring of the thermal situation (even machine guns will be detected if there is tight control, mortars, and even more so artillery with MLRS, will be detected in general from many kilometers away). and everything that is found to be destroyed by rockets or Lancets.
      oh how many lives would be saved
      1. -12
        30 March 2022 05: 34
        Quote: just explo
        oh how many lives would be saved

        Those. the fact that UAVs and BBs are used, and how it turns out to be quite intensive, are you not interested? The main thing is to tragically wring your hands?
        For me, the practical absence of modern AWACS capable of detecting MLRS and OTRK launchers for 300 km before launching missiles is much worse.
        1. +6
          30 March 2022 06: 38
          1) who told you that they are used intensively enough?
          turntables are used quite intensively, cruise missiles are used quite intensively.
          and BB is only Cub-UAV and is still used in Kueva. in the east of the ruins, their use is not seen from the word at all.
          2) You didn’t confuse the Point with Elbrus for an hour? the dimensions of the kagbe are generally different. and Elbrus, hell, what kind of AWACS will detect 300 km. then God forbid that they would see a hundred, and then if she leaves in an open field
          1. -5
            30 March 2022 06: 56
            Quote: just explo
            and BB is only Cub-UAV and is still used in Kueva. in the east of the ruins, their use is not seen from the word at all.

            And who should be noticed? Who was hit?
            Fans of UAVs and BBs are very fond of citing Karabakh as an example, they just forget that it was not the Armenians who began to show the results of the work of the BB and UAVs, but the Azerbaijanis. When deemed necessary.


            Quote: just explo
            You didn’t confuse the Point with Elbrus for an hour? the dimensions of the kagbe are generally different. and Elbrus, hell, what kind of AWACS will detect 300 km. then God forbid that they would see a hundred, and then if she leaves in an open field


            Far from new A-50/50u.
            Range detection of ground targets:

            single target type of launcher of operational-tactical missiles: up to 300 km
            group goals such as "column of tanks": up to 250 km
            1. +6
              30 March 2022 08: 01
              so the Azerbaijanis nevertheless showed a video of the use of both BB and Spikes and UAVs.
              By the way, try to turn on the Moscow, can you calculate the EPR of the COLUMN OF TANKS and compare it with the EPR of the Point?
              but about 300 km and I can write, but why bother with trifles, I can write about 1000 km, paper and tyrnet will endure everything.
              1. -5
                30 March 2022 09: 34
                Quote: just explo
                but about 300 km and I can write, but why bother with trifles, I can write about 1000 km, paper and tyrnet will endure everything.

                Actually, of. data. And you write all sorts of things.

                Quote: just explo
                so the Azerbaijanis nevertheless showed a video of the use of both BB and Spikes and UAVs.
                Well, ours began to show the use of BB, albeit in the form of vague pictures. And even more so, footage from reconnaissance UAVs, don’t you see or what?

                Quote: just explo
                By the way, try to turn on the Moscow, can you calculate the EPR of the COLUMN OF TANKS and compare it with the EPR of the Point?
                Those. the fact that a single OTRK from a greater distance than a column of tanks glows did not bother you? It's a pity, because it's not about the mass and not even about the length, but it's about the height of the car! I hope you will not deny that the Tochka-U launcher is noticeably higher than the tank? Like Elbrus.
        2. +1
          30 March 2022 14: 09
          I agree, nothing to whine about! In Kuev there was a photo of only two Kuba shot down by clearly small arms fire (the rest are just the same shot down, only from other angles and transferred to another place), one more - in the Donbass, there was not a single whole, so most likely the electronic warfare of the Anglo-Saxons, which dill stuffed to the ears - can not yet protect against them. Most likely, they are actively working with Cubes, because it is not so easy to shoot down an air target at a speed of over 100 km / h and a couple of those shot down are a hundred or more used ones. There are heels of AWACS in Belarus, but how they are used is still a mystery and let's hope to strengthen our aviation systems quantitatively and qualitatively, because now the war is not against the home-grown Armed Forces of Ukraine, but against all intelligence, command and control systems, EW countermeasures and NATO headquarters that participate from that side.
      2. +7
        30 March 2022 07: 57
        Quote: just explo
        and everything that is found to be destroyed by rockets or Lancets.
        oh how many lives would be saved

        Completely agree with your comment. From myself, I will only add that the saturation of our troops with BB would cost the budget of the Moscow Region relatively cheaply. It is surprising that despite the high efficiency of the use of such weapons as the BB, proven by the same Azerbaijan, its role in the denazification of the Ukroreich is very limited. Suppose there are not enough of their products. Who is stopping you from acquiring them from China or the same Turkey? Sanctions? This is ridiculous. You can buy through the same Azerbaijan, North Korea or Moldova, in extreme cases, you can organize secret deliveries. And all this will cost mere pennies. But how many problems are solved at once. The opposite side immediately becomes uninterested in placing heavy weapons in residential buildings, anti-tank systems and snipers on the roofs of buildings, etc. At the same time, the problem of collateral damage is being solved, due to which our troops cannot attack the above-mentioned targets. From 1kg. The warhead high-rise building will not work out, and the sniper, MLRS, anti-tank systems, mortar will be guaranteed to be destroyed. Question to the planners of the operation: why is there no proper scale of application? I'll even ask the question in a different way: What ...?
      3. +4
        30 March 2022 10: 44
        Quote: just explo
        Eagles with a thermal imager (if taken en masse)

        hi
        I studied the video of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation about the work of the Eagles.
        I paid attention to the module with optics
        There is something to improve


        Link to this video
        https://vk.com/mil?z=video-133441491_456253509%2Fdbf7ced793564b3c7a%2Fpl_wall_-133441491
      4. 0
        31 March 2022 00: 27
        There is. There was a video of the destruction of the building using the Lancet 3.
    2. +4
      30 March 2022 06: 46
      Quote: 28st region
      Actually, what is so difficult about these BBs? The same UAV. From a complex and expensive guidance system.

      What's difficult? Small size that needs a lot to fit in. Of our two types of loitering ammunition, the troops are asking for "Lancets", since the "KUB" from Kalashnikov showed low resistance to the effects of enemy electronic warfare
    3. +1
      26 May 2022 00: 26
      Molded fiberglass case, collectorless + controller and battery from HobiKing company, cheap video camera with 2.4/5.8 gigahertz transmitter, brushless gymbal to stabilize it,
      ~ prime cost 150-170 dollars max.
      The question is: how much is it sold in the state, and why does the state itself not produce such products at its own factories in order to save money and make a large amount ???

      good business was done by Russian aircraft models ....
      1. +1
        26 May 2022 03: 16
        Try to learn Russian.
        1. 0
          26 May 2022 23: 27
          Just because I'm wrong doesn't mean I'm wrong. wink
          1. +1
            27 May 2022 01: 27
            So.
            The cost of the American Switchblade 300 is the simplest and cheapest option 6000 dollars, the Russian Cube is 3 times cheaper, the Lancet is two times cheaper, with the same performance characteristics.
            Learn to write in Russian and lie.
  2. +9
    30 March 2022 03: 35
    The author, please write briefly, how many times did the members of the forum make this request? And on the topic, there are few, catastrophically few of this type of weapon!
    1. 0
      30 March 2022 05: 44
      Quote: ASAD
      The author, please write briefly, how many times did the members of the forum make this request?

      hi You must have been joking or don't stand your feet, got up, woke up? Well, how much should the article be cut so that it becomes readable for you ~ 2-3 paragraphs? The topic is serious, briefly without snot almost disclosed. p.s. no offense smile
  3. +1
    30 March 2022 04: 04
    Well, well ... the author talked about "kamikaze" drones interestingly and thanks to him for that! I hope that after some time we will find out details about the effectiveness of the use of "outposts" and "pacers" in the Special Operation ... There remains one "open question" ... helicopters (!) ... those very unmanned helicopters that were demonstrated relatively recently at the parade in Moscow! Do they take part in NWO and what do they do there...(or how they "work")...?

    1. +8
      30 March 2022 05: 40
      I’m more interested in why they didn’t make a bait tank, a remote-controlled tank where there is no ammunition, but the engine is booked at the very least (they shoot mainly at the turret and at the front of the hull so that the BC would jerk, but it’s not there until you stop such a tank he can get from fifty hits), and so that he would be let forward and that the enemy in urban battles would not only spend expensive rockets and grenades on him, but also reveal his positions, which would immediately be covered by a cover group. (I generally dreamed of making a tank for purely urban battles, 152mm low ballistics with HE and thermobaric shells, AGS, and machine guns, KAZ + DZ and also preferably on telecontrol, there are no drones and a communication channel can be made powerful and even a radius of several hundred meters, you put out the hell, and here comes the bait tank first, and behind it is such a tank for urban battles which will cover everything that opens up when the bait tank is fired and reveals electronics, but the infantry is already behind it)
      1. 0
        30 March 2022 06: 47
        Quote: just explo
        why didn’t they make a bait tank, a remote-controlled tank

        Development is underway. An article was recently
        https://topwar.ru/193694-robototehnicheskij-kompleks-shturm-idet-podgotovka-k-ispytanijam.html
      2. fiv
        +4
        30 March 2022 07: 50
        This would be funny. Once in a shed in an unused entrance behind a plywood door, I filled the opening with concrete, and left the door with a frail lock. The door was broken five times.
      3. +4
        30 March 2022 08: 02
        Quote: just explo
        as long as you stop such a tank, he can get it with fifty hits), and so that he would be allowed to go forward and that the enemy in urban battles would not only spend expensive rockets and grenades on him, but also reveal his positions

        What a demoralizing effect!
      4. -1
        31 May 2022 17: 42
        "but the engine is booked for the most do not indulge"
        No armor will save you from a modern ATGM. Yes, and you can’t close the caterpillars with anything. So with an accurate hit, this bait can get up from the very first grenade and block the path of those following it. The only plus is that people will not die in it. And there won’t be much combat value from it. Now, if you make a full-fledged robot with AI from a tank, With the ability to detect targets and threats at all 360 degrees, KAZ protection and powerful means of fire destruction. Then there will be more use from this.
  4. 0
    30 March 2022 05: 34
    I think soon attack aircraft and bombers of the Aerospace Forces will begin to use conventional ammunition. Aircraft guidance systems and the refinement of such ammunition make it possible to use them. Of course, when suppressing long-range air defense.
  5. 0
    30 March 2022 05: 39
    La-la-poplar! Zvizdabol! Where are the videos, where these ammunition destroy Bandera? I saw how Azerbaijani ammunition works! Fine! They flew into the dugout through the entrance behind the fleeing soldier. Tanks, guns struck once or twice! And we have nothing but tra-la-la! They show, calmly shoot several hailstones with full packets at our soldiers and NO reaction! Only later, when they arrive at the hangar, then they beat.
    1. 0
      11 June 2022 19: 26
      Only these are not Azerbaijani BBs, but Israeli Spikes. Israel will not sell them to everyone, only with the approval of the Anglo-Saxons. That made it necessary to stir up the conflict in the South Caucasus, so modern weapons appeared in Baku
  6. 0
    30 March 2022 05: 49
    It would be interesting to know - the electronic filling and the engine of our production? And if ours, is there any percentage of imported components in the product?
    1. +4
      30 March 2022 08: 55
      Controllers, drivers and fpga for 1k LE have long been mastered by us, even nanometers are not needed there, micrometers are enough. Motors are ridiculous, there is nothing simpler than a 3 (or even n) phase motor. We also make IR and CCD matrices ourselves, we can also make bolometric matrices, thanks to the French. Of course, not 4K or FHD, but in some applications 128x128 for the eyes.
      The whole problem is the price, which is fantastic due to low production volumes.
      I won’t say anything about percentages, because I don’t know. With a certain degree of probability, we can say that in this particular area, everyone can do it themselves. But as a matter of fact - xs.
  7. +5
    30 March 2022 06: 37
    A purely couch opinion - a swarm of different drones should be spinning over the Azov. It was simply impossible to get out ...
    1. +3
      30 March 2022 08: 06
      Quote: arhitroll
      over the azov, a swarm of different drones should be spinning. It was impossible to get out...

      Over any enemy of Russia in the fighting. hi
      1. +3
        30 March 2022 09: 48
        Even in Syria, from the very beginning of the operation, they asked the same questions, several years passed, but ... The Ministry of Defense completely blew this topic about the reason for "frivolity", well, they are not interested in messing around with such "small things"! Here is the MLRS, TOS or OTRK, yes! From power and scale! Are people dying? Well, this is a war, the percentage of losses is not great, what's the problem then?
  8. +7
    30 March 2022 09: 27
    One feature of the BB is the ability to hang in the air for a long time, waiting for the target to reveal itself or manifest itself. For example, a sniper or a mortar in cover. The blow will be delivered before the enemy changes position. At the same time, seeing a flying BB, the enemy will be suppressed, otherwise he may provoke a blow to himself.
    1. -1
      30 March 2022 13: 37
      Quote: riwas
      One feature of the BB is the ability to hang in the air for a long time, waiting for the target to reveal itself or manifest itself. For example, a sniper or a mortar in cover. The blow will be delivered before the enemy changes position. At the same time, seeing a flying BB, the enemy will be suppressed, otherwise he may provoke a blow to himself.

      40 minutes of autonomy is only to reach the goal. There is no talk of any barrage. The same ammunition fell in Kyiv due to the exhaustion of autonomy
  9. +2
    30 March 2022 12: 11
    Does this mean that in the case of the supply of American kamikaze ammunition to the Ukrotroops, one should begin to fear for our helicopters? And, in turn, start supplying such ammunition to the SAR?
  10. +2
    30 March 2022 13: 15
    The massive use of BB and not one worthwhile video about its use from the projectile itself. Some kind of blurry photo from a surveillance UAV. Even from Syria there were video confirmations. And it looks like another noodle. Although the need for this weapon and its effectiveness is already clear to everyone.
    1. +1
      30 March 2022 21: 55
      The war is on, people are dying, and you just have to watch spectacular videos.
      Full video in poor quality in the Cart, look at your health.
      1. 0
        6 May 2022 11: 53
        Massive use of BB and not one worthwhile video about its use from the projectile itself. Some kind of blurry photo from surveillance UAV


        Here I am about the same.
        Video from the fields of the special operation - through the roof. And tanks and planes and helicopters and Iskanders and MLRS and saboteurs ... but there is nothing about BBs .. but they are ...

        The war is on, people are dying, and you just have to watch spectacular videos
        .

        weak excuse.
  11. -2
    30 March 2022 13: 50
    For the first time I read that such a weapon was used in Ukraine.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. 0
    31 March 2022 01: 15
    Quote: Polite Elk
    Suppose there are not enough of their products. Who prevents to buy them from China or the same Turkey? Sanctions? This is ridiculous. You can buy through the same Azerbaijan, North Korea or Moldova, in extreme cases, you can organize secret deliveries. And all this will cost mere pennies. But how many problems are solved at once.

    +100
    But the Russian military-industrial complex wants money for itself. It’s not for them to actually go into battle, exposing their bodies to machine gun fire or pturs
    1. +1
      31 March 2022 15: 24
      No, it’s just that our Defense Ministry saves on everything, just like UAVs saved on KAZ for tanks and hinged anti-cumulative dynamic protection and armor screens for armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, because of which hundreds of pieces of equipment and hundreds of killed personnel of the crews of these vehicles from fire were lost in Ukraine RPG anti-tank missiles and guns of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and national battalions.
  14. 0
    April 3 2022 13: 09
    In my opinion, if the Russian Armed Forces had duly available unmanned aerial vehicles in a bunch - BB + unmanned gunner, then the problem with the "Jewish banders" that had settled in urban buildings would have been resolved as soon as possible, and without losses on our part.
  15. 0
    10 May 2022 16: 08
    Time spent in the air 40 min. It flies into the zone of the intended location of the target ..... Well, how can it not be found ??? ..... These are all half measures. "A medium-altitude reconnaissance and strike UAV developed in the UAE can stay in the air for up to five days (120 hours). It is capable of carrying 1 kg of ammunition. The ceiling is 030 km." .
  16. 0
    24 May 2022 23: 32
    Quote: 28st region
    Nevertheless, in general, APs are a promising and interesting tool for solving various combat missions.

    Actually, what is so difficult about these BBs? The same UAV. From a complex and expensive guidance system.
    I don’t know how they were used during the operation in / in Ukraine, but in Syria the MTR did a good job with them. Worked out both the design and tactics of use. For the destruction of point unarmored targets, this is for now. Over time, developments will go to destroy armored targets, the charge power will be increased and they will approach and even overtake, especially at a price, such types of ammunition as a guided artillery shell.

    The Excalibur guided art projectile cost about $70.000 for the US Army, more than $100.000 for export, if sclerosis does not fail me.
    Switchblade about $6.000. The difference is more than 10 times.
    It is clear that the weight of the warhead on the switch is much less.
    But still, even with an equal weight of the warhead, let's say conditionally 18 kg, such a kamikaze drone will not rise in price to the factory price of an S class Mercedes. If only some kind of stool does not try.
    With high accuracy, a heavy warhead is basically not needed.
  17. -2
    31 May 2022 18: 04
    "The benefits of Cubes and Lancets have already been shown at test sites and in a real Syrian operation."
    Maybe they showed themselves at the training grounds, but in the NWO so far this is not particularly visible. On the contrary, a video often shown by the Ministry of Defense shows that the same KUB, when attacking a battery of American M777 howitzers, did not hit any of them. He fell 15-20 meters from them and did not harm them with his 3 kg charge. Bandera then took away and hid these guns in the forest. After that, our MLRS hail covered this area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbthe forest with a volley. But whether or not the howitzers were destroyed is unknown.
  18. 0
    5 June 2022 23: 03
    We need an even bigger option ... by helicopter
  19. 0
    11 June 2022 20: 17
    Hundreds of these Lancets should be used under the same Avdiivka. After all, they essentially cost a penny. And how many lives in Mariupol would be saved from snipers and grenade launchers, and there would be an order of magnitude less destruction. Give our generals a scale: Hurricanes, Tornadoes, the whole world is in dust , and why does an operator with BB need so many generals? They still haven’t bothered to introduce reconnaissance quadrocopters into the regular armament of platoons and companies, but they are needed like air. The whole country is collecting money for their purchase. with the Chechen special forces. See how they are fully equipped and how the marines. Kadyrov protects people and does not save on them, unlike the army logistics logistics. Hence the difference in losses
  20. 0
    18 June 2022 08: 34
    I think that a strike UAV is still preferable.
    1. Flies higher and further.
    2. Stays in the air longer.
    3. Monitors a large area.
    4. Reusable.
    5. Has several rockets (in case one of them fails).

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"