The offensive of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation - the inhabitants of Slavyansk heard the approach of the front

March 15 2022 17

Yuri Podolyaka
Yes, they heard exactly the approach of the front. The same front that left here more than seven years ago ...

17 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Kaufman

+7

15 March 2022 05: 58

We are waiting for news about the liberation of Slavyansk!
Ros 56

+4

15 March 2022 06: 30

Yes, Slavyansk is the beginning of the fight against the fascist Bandera. It's been a little longer to wait.
Santa Fe

-7

15 March 2022 06: 40

I am surprised at the ability of Yu. Podolyak to carry complete nonsense with a straight face

How are the firing range of a gun and the range of sound propagation related?

If Slavyansk is in the artillery hit zone (~ 15 km), its inhabitants will not hear shots and see the explosions of shells

The sounds of the cannonade itself only indicate that a battle is being fought somewhere. Maybe tens of kilometers
1. KCA
  
  +1
  
  15 March 2022 08: 20
  
  The main self-propelled gun is the Msta-S, and it is unlikely that they will drag the towed one to the offensive, although there is also the Msta-B, the range was 30 km, I don’t know how many in the latest modifications, the Krasnopol is more than 40 km, which 15?
  1. Santa Fe
    
    -2
    
    15 March 2022 08: 23
    
    what are xnumx?
    
    So said by the expert on the video, see the moment 3:30
    1. Shuttle
      
      +3
      
      15 March 2022 13: 39
      
      Quote: Santa Fe
      what are xnumx?
      
      So said by the expert on the video, see the moment 3:30
      
      Well, let me quote for you.
      - And another very interesting news came from Slavyansk. Local residents who live in this city, have been living for a long time, said: "For the first time we heard something that we have not heard for more than 7 years." What exactly did they hear? They heard the shots heavy artillery pieces, which, as in 2014, are located around the city. And what does it say? And taking into account the fact that the range [of action, prim Shuttle ] about 18-19 kilometers, well, the normal range for a more or less accurate shot is around 15 kilometers. This suggests that Russian troops are already at this distance from Slavyansk.
      
      The weapons are heavy. In other words - long-range. What's wrong?
2. Shuttle
  
  +2
  
  15 March 2022 13: 13
  
  Heading "Ask? We answer!"
  Quote: Santa Fe
  
  How are the firing range of a gun and the range of sound propagation related?
  
  The more long-range weapon, the higher the energy of the propellant charge, the stronger the sound caused by the shot.
  
  On average, during the day on flat terrain in summer, a shot from a firearm can be heard at a distance of up to 3 km, a gun shot (single) - up to 5 km, and gun fire (battery salvo) can be heard at a distance of 15 km.
  1. Santa Fe
    
    -5
    
    15 March 2022 13: 27
    
    The expert on the video linked the range of sound propagation with the firing range of the gun (15-18 km)
    1. Shuttle
      
      +2
      
      15 March 2022 13: 43
      
      Quote: Santa Fe
      The expert on the video linked the range of sound propagation with the firing range of the gun (15-18 km)
      
      The author of the video said that the inhabitants of Slavyansk heard what they had not heard since 2014. Namely, shots heavy guns. The inhabitants of Slavyansk are well acquainted with these sounds and, unlike the EDR, are able to distinguish a heavy weapon from any other rattle. Sad experience.
      Well, then the elementary logic. Heavy gun - long range. It's elementary.
    2. bk316
      
      +1
      
      15 March 2022 14: 02
      
      The expert on the video linked the range of sound propagation with the firing range of the gun (15-18 km)
      
      And it is right. Anyone who has ever been at art shooting knows that the d-30 is heard for 5 km, sometimes 10 km and 2a26 for 15 at least or even 20. So, approximately as the comrade said. The explanation is simple, the more energy is released when fired, the further the projectile flies and the louder the sound. Well, other things being equal, of course.
      1. bk316
        
        0
        
        15 March 2022 14: 54
        
        ugh you 2a36
        Moreover, it would seem that when you stand nearby, the d-30 shoots louder, and the rapier, by the way, is even louder. But at a distance of 2a36 you can hear further ....
  2. mongolian9999
    
    0
    
    16 March 2022 17: 52
    
    A single shot of self-propelled guns is heard from twenty kilometers away. And as a child, I fell asleep under them, when they shot at the training ground and later had to in the service.
3. Roman Efremov
  
  +1
  
  15 March 2022 21: 31
  
  Podolyaka meant that the inhabitants of Slavyansk hear the volleys of the UKRAINIAN ARTILLERY, which fires from the outskirts of the city. The firing range of Acacia self-propelled guns is 15-20 km - about as far as the front line from the city.
4. LOCKS
  
  0
  
  16 March 2022 06: 38
  
  [quote] [I am surprised at the ability of Yu. Podolyak to carry complete nonsense with a straight face / quote] This fully reflects the semantic load of your comment (((
  1. Santa Fe
    
    -1
    
    16 March 2022 08: 34
    
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=47GUBdiHOUw
    
    How do you like the quality and semantic load of such analytics
    
    Everything that this expert said, over time, turned out to be a set of incoherent words. With the confident look of an expert. Karabakh or Ukraine, the accuracy of his forecasts - a finger to the sky
    1. KKND
      
      0
      
      16 March 2022 14: 05
      
      Quote: Santa Fe
      How do you like the quality and semantic load of such analytics
      
      Everything that this expert said, over time, turned out to be a set of incoherent words. With the confident look of an expert. Karabakh or Ukraine, the accuracy of his forecasts - a finger to the sky
      
      Oleg, excuse me if I seem intrusive, here I have a book on physics in 1998, issued by Doctor of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Professor Yu.G. Pavlenko, textbook for schoolchildren and university entrants. Lectures that were given at the Mathematical School at Moscow State University.
      I quote.
      5.4.6 On the way to a personal computer.
      .... What can give the Internet? It seems that this network is in a hurry to share the fate of radio and TV, polluting the noosphere with 99% electronic nonsense. And yet, remember the Latin saying: "sapienti sat" - the intelligent will understand how to use this outstanding invention of an open society.
      
      end of quote.
      Experts who know how to do something, do it and not knock on the keys on the Internet or shoot videos.
      This is a very complex physics textbook (at least for me), the professor probably made lyrical digressions to relax the brain.
      1. Santa Fe
        
        -1
        
        17 March 2022 09: 09
        
        sorry if I sound annoying
        
        In no case!
        Experts who can do something
        
        Yes. Another such saying came across. Who knows - he does not speak, who speaks - does not know
        
        As for the analytics on the Podolyak Y. channel, I watch his reviews at dinner, like a black comedy. It is especially interesting to review past releases. It can be seen how a person strains his last fantasy in order to find some explanation for the obvious that will suit the public. And comments under the video, pure psychology, an experiment from which Ash and Edelson would be delighted
        
        Day one - thanks for the truthful information. The days that follow are naive questions
        
        Why the next forecast did not come true (as if for the first time)
        Why did you draw like this last time, and now it’s like this again (paper will endure everything)
        Who are your informants? (why are there informants in this scheme if he himself knows what the public wants to hear)
        ...

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"