The heir to the pistol "Mars"

66

Commander C. R. Samson is the first British pilot to take off from the deck of a ship. Pictured with a Webley & Scott .455 pistol

Whose address is on a hard bag,
Where is death packaged?
Who is the bullet for?
Where is she going to fly to today?

Adam Lindsay Gordon
(October 19, 1833 - June 24, 1870)

stories about weapons. So, last time we got acquainted with the English pistol "Mars", so powerful and so complex that it was so accepted into service and was not and ... it's good that it wasn't. However, the idea of ​​​​getting a powerful self-loading pistol (in England they did not like the word “automatic”) did not leave the minds of the British military. Therefore, development work on such weapons began to be carried out there at the end of the XNUMXth century, and at the very beginning of the XNUMXth century they were continued.

And by the way, several of the very prototypes of a self-loading pistol that Hugh Gabbet-Fairfax designed under the general name "Mars" in 1903 were not in vain. People just saw - "how not to." So how should it be? A year later, one of the directors of the Webley and Scott company, William John Whiting, managed to demonstrate “how it should be”, who, again, based on the Mars pistol (well, where to go from him?) Designed his self-loading pistol 1904, chambered for a .455 (11,2 mm) caliber revolver cartridge, used both in the army and in navy.



The heir to the pistol "Mars"

Even outwardly, Whiting's first sample looked like the unforgettable "Mars"

The pistol of 1904 turned out to be complex, bulky and heavy. A clear failure was the use of a welt cartridge, that is, a cartridge with a rim. Therefore, already in 1905, Whiting developed a much more compact model M1905 with a blowback for a relatively weak pistol cartridge 7,65 mm Browning cartridge. The mechanism of the pistol was more than original: a V-shaped flat return spring, which interacted with the casing-bolt using a swinging lever, was located on it under the right cheek of its handle!


Absolutely indigestible design, isn't it? Well, at least this spring was placed in the back of the handle. So no, they put it on the side. Although, on the other hand, the design is nowhere simpler. There is also no thermal effect on the spring. And the spring itself is flat. The production of such springs was well developed at that time.

The Webley and Scott pistol of the 1905 model began to be mass-produced, it was somewhat modernized in 1908, and it turned out to be so successful that it was in production until 1940. The police were also armed with it, not only in Great Britain, but also in a number of other European countries, and in addition, it was on commercial sale. At that time, England did not yet have one of the most stringent laws in the world, depriving its citizens of the right to own personal short-barreled weapons, not to mention wearing them.


Still, designing a pistol for a revolving welt cartridge is not the best idea ...

But in those years there was no such law in England, therefore, for self-defense, on the basis of the 1905 model, they made a pocket self-loading pistol of the 1906 model of the year, chambered for 6,35 mm Browning, which was very popular at that time. The Model 1906 also had a blowback. The V-shaped return spring was still hidden in the handle on the right and acted on the shutter with a swinging lever. In the best traditions of that time, the safety lever was located above the handle on the left, the magazine was used in a single row, and its latch was at the bottom of the handle, like most pistols of that time. Sights on it were absent in principle. Again, in 1909, on the basis of this sample, a pistol was made under a stronger cartridge of the 9-mm Browning Long caliber.


Commercial advertising for the sale of Webley and Scott pistols in Russia

Differences from the previous model: a larger caliber and the absence of a safety lever, which was replaced with an automatic grip safety at the rear of the handle. Sights finally appeared: a front sight, made as part of the barrel, and a rear sight in the groove of the casing-bolt, and with the ability to make lateral corrections. Provided on this pistol and a swivel on the handle for attaching a pistol belt.


Pistol M1910. View from the left. Photo littlegun.be

The M1910 pistol was designed to use .38 ACP (9 × 23SR) cartridges adopted in the USA. And here, interesting engineering solutions finally appeared, although it also used a short barrel stroke. However, the locking of the barrel took place with the help of inclined protrusions made on the barrel, which moved in the grooves on the frame. Also on the barrel there was a protrusion that entered the window on the casing-gate. Already in our time, the idea of ​​​​engaging the barrel with the bolt through the window to eject the cartridges will be used in Glock pistols. But everything else was thought out, frankly, not very well.


The same pistol. Right view. Photo littlegun.be

And the automatics of this pistol worked like this: the barrel, being coupled with the casing-bolt, moved by the recoil force along the inclined grooves of the frame back and at the same time down. At the same time, they disengaged, and the shutter-casing moved back, while the barrel, meanwhile, returned forward by the force of the spring, after which the shutter-casing followed it, sending the next cartridge from the magazine into the chamber. USM trigger type, single action. The V-shaped spring, like on all other Whiting "webables", is located under the right cheek of the handle. The pistol turned out to be very good, but in Europe, because of its unusual cartridge, it was not in high demand.


The inscription on the casing-shutter. Photo littlegun.be

But all this, so to speak, was only a prelude to what was finally created in 1912. At the same time, a self-loading pistol appeared, which a year later was accepted into service with the Royal Navy under the official name of the Webley and Scott Self-loading Pistol Mk I Marine, and it was the first automatic pistol that entered service with the British armed forces. The same automation as on the previous sample, only the caliber is no longer 9 mm, but 11,2 mm, that is, 0,441 inches (although officially its caliber was considered equal to 0,445).

The cartridge was really very powerful. It is enough, for example, to say that it was impossible to shoot his cartridges from a revolver of the same caliber. It could have been torn apart. The pistol was equipped with an automatic grip safety, which blocked the trigger until its lever was released while wrapping around the handle. The trigger of this pistol was somewhat similar to the trigger of the TT pistol, also assembled in one separate block. There was a shutter delay, a casing-bolt after all the cartridges were used up in the rearmost position. The shutter delay switch was placed on the left side of the frame.


"Webley and Scott" M1910, Type 3, issue of 1911. Overall length 205 mm, barrel length 127 mm, weight 970 g. Caliber .38. Royal Arsenal, Leeds

Outwardly, the gun looked like previous samples, but because of its large size it seemed even more angular. Its characteristic "square" shape was complemented by its handle, placed under the casing-bolt with a minimum slope. Because of this, it was quite difficult (unlike the Parabellum pistol) to fire offhand from it. However, a trained shooter could hit targets quite successfully from it.

In addition, which, by the way, was also immediately noted by the troops, it was also a good weapon in hand-to-hand combat, because even without cartridges its weight reached 1,43 kg. It was enough to take it by the barrel and hit the enemy with the handle on the head in order to immediately disable him with one blow!


Mk I "Marine" issue of 1915. Left side view. Photo littlegun.be


He is the right side. Photo littlegun.be


For pistols for pilots, such a “butt” was offered! Photo littlegun.be
Also in 1915, the Mk I was adopted as a limited standard weapon by the Royal Horse Artillery and the Royal Flying Corps. When the First World War ended, Webley and Scott continued to produce self-loading pistols of this type, but the main emphasis was placed on samples chambered for 6,35 mm, 7,65 mm and 9 mm calibers, the release of which continued in 1940.

TTX pistols "Webley and Scott" designed by John Whiting


Model 1905


Caliber: 7,65mm Browning (7,65×16)
Overall length: mm 159
Barrel length: 89 mm
Empty weight: 580 g
Store capacity: 8 cartridges


Model 1906


Caliber: 6,35mm Browning (6,35×16)
Overall length: mm 120
Barrel length: 54 mm
Empty weight: 340 g
Store capacity: 6 cartridges



Webley & Scott semi-automatic pistol .25ACP. They were produced from 1906 to 1940 and are a smaller version of the police pistol, but with an open trigger. The .25 ACP version has a 6-round magazine, blue burnishing, and plastic grips. On the left side of the slide is marked "WEBLEY & SCOTT LTD/LONDON & BIRMINGHAM/6.35m/m AUTOMATIC PISTOL". Caliber 6,35 mm (.25ACP) Photo by littlegun.be

Model 1909


Caliber: 9mm Browning Long (9×20)
Overall length: mm 203
Barrel length: 140 mm
Empty weight: 985 g
Store capacity: 8 cartridges


Model 1910


Caliber: .38 ACP (9 × 23)
Overall length: mm 203
Barrel length: 127 mm
Empty weight: 540 g
Store capacity: 8 cartridges


Mk. I "Marine"


Caliber: .455 Webley (11,43×23)
Overall length: mm 203
Barrel length: 127 mm
Empty weight: 990 g
Store capacity: 7 cartridges



A 1914 Webley and Scott police officer. Its device is well shown: oblique projections on the breech breech, a lever in the handle and its V-shaped spring. The gun was arranged, of course, nowhere is easier!


The device of the pistol and the cartridge for it ...


And this is how it looks in the hand of the shooter. Not bad, let's say. But its frame - see the photo below, was technologically complex, and its manufacture required many different operations.


Pistol "Webley and Scott" M1911 caliber 7,65 mm. Overall length 158,7 mm, barrel length 88,9 mm, thickness 25 mm. Auckland War Memorial Museum, New Zealand


Commercial model M1910, manufactured in 1924. Overall length: 157 mm. Barrel length: 89 mm. Empty weight: 540 g. Royal Arsenal, Leeds

В качестве вывода: the main advantages of this pistol were the simplicity of design and large caliber (for an army pistol), although the design was very primitive, the weight was too large, and in order to shoot accurately from it, you had to be a well-trained shooter!
66 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    12 March 2022 03: 24
    Thanks Vyacheslav for an interesting article. hi
    I looked at these ugly pistols and spat for a long time ... after all, the British have no creative imagination ... the combat characteristics of the weapons are not bad, but the aesthetics and practicality are below the plinth ... the Germans are simply gods compared to this.
    Carrying such angular pistols in your pocket is dangerous ... you will definitely catch on something and tear it.
    1. +5
      12 March 2022 03: 35
      Army pistols in your pocket do not carry
      1. +2
        12 March 2022 03: 57
        Army pistols in your pocket do not carry

        What about commercial options? smile
        1. +3
          12 March 2022 05: 34
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          Army pistols in your pocket do not carry

          What about commercial options? smile

          It is clear that Webley-Scott is not as elegant as Browning. But in general, these were quite workable designs. A pistol chambered in 6,35 mm is quite comparable to a pocket Browning of the same caliber.
          1. +1
            12 March 2022 22: 22
            Yes dass. And do not forget that this pistol is based on an army model.
            I don't care what my belly is shot in a tavern with from an elegant brownie or from a clumsy revolver
        2. 0
          12 March 2022 12: 52
          Quote: Lech from Android.
          What about commercial options? smile
          You should not carry any pistols in your pockets - because it is fraught, only in a holster. Use a normal holster or a concealed carry holster.
    2. +3
      12 March 2022 08: 52
      Lech, I completely agree: Webley is 100% freak. And the fighting qualities are also not impressive.
      1. +2
        12 March 2022 15: 00
        Well, why so?
        He's just weird
        :)
      2. +1
        12 March 2022 22: 24
        11mm plus
        Not impressive?
        Well I xs
        1. 0
          13 March 2022 11: 44
          Colt M1911 with the same caliber, but more comfortable
    3. +6
      12 March 2022 08: 54
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      the British have no creative imagination

      Camel is a horse made in England :)))
    4. +4
      12 March 2022 10: 26
      So to speak, the embodiment of the universally recognized beauty of English women ... laughing
    5. +3
      12 March 2022 11: 36
      Quote: Lech from Android.
      Thanks Vyacheslav for an interesting article.

      I join, a series of articles is very informative and interesting. hi
  2. +6
    12 March 2022 06: 28
    Thank you, Vyacheslav Olegovich.
    These are the articles that are an outlet in the current
    crazy information field...
    1. +4
      12 March 2022 07: 00
      Quote: Leader of the Redskins
      are an outlet

      I think so too.
      1. +2
        12 March 2022 14: 41
        Thank you, Vyacheslav, I still didn't know that "Vebley" is locked through the window for ejection of shells. And it turns out he was the first. Somehow I never took a close interest in this system, I was a freak, and we didn’t have a single one in the repository.
        Already in our time, the idea of ​​​​engaging the barrel with the bolt through the window to eject the cartridges will be used in Glock pistols.

        Wow, an amateur in the design of weapons, Gaston Glock, somehow did it before, and the Belgians who ate a pack of dogs only finished it twenty years after him in their Browning PRO-9.
        1. +1
          12 March 2022 15: 06
          Nothing amateur! He bought a bunch of licenses. And he hired engineers who had previously been engaged in construction tools. I know a thing or two about this.
          There, in general, the Glock concept was interesting.

          I say right away I didn’t shoot with Glock. My grandfather tt.
          1. 0
            12 March 2022 15: 14
            I meant the obvious, that Glock had never dealt with weapons before.
            Gaston Glock started with the production of curtain rods, as well as knives for the Austrian army, being also a specialist in the field of polymer materials.
            Gaston Glock is actually the only designer in history of not just one successful sample of small arms, but also the only sample in general.



            "Glock" also did not use. My grandfather R.38. smile
            1. +1
              12 March 2022 15: 35
              Yes, this is the point! A construction tool is no different from a short barrel in essence. Not even a very short one.
              The conditions are the same.
              Materials plus minus too.
              Well, there are a lot of well-founded opinions here on the forum. Starting from the Glock rules! Finishing what for me this screwdriver?
              That's why I love the good old TT. It's not a pity to leave him.
              In fact, honestly, the most zebest is a couple. But they say he is hemorrhoids in constant use. I won't argue, I don't know.
              A couple stuck into my hand!
              The second SV revolver also lay down as if I was born with it. 32 year old
              1. +1
                12 March 2022 15: 40
                . But they say he is hemorrhoids in constant use.


                I didn’t see anything “hemorrhoids” in the GXNUMX, I just don’t really like hammerless systems.
                SV revolv

                I shot from the "Taurus" 38 Sp - I liked it, but this is the same "Smith and Wesson".
                1. 0
                  12 March 2022 16: 27
                  Okay, I don’t ask for SW and Para because I don’t have experience.
                  What would you wear every day?
                  I am TT.
                  1. +1
                    12 March 2022 16: 39
                    What would you wear every day?

                    Pants laughing . Joke. smile
                    Sorry, but to answer such questions ... we are not children. drinks
                    1. 0
                      12 March 2022 23: 24
                      Well, I understand. Give it, probably.
                  2. 0
                    13 March 2022 12: 03
                    "worn every day" I like Walter PP
            2. -1
              12 March 2022 16: 37
              My friend had a p38 45! caliber
              I do not even know what to say
              1. 0
                12 March 2022 16: 44
                I do not even know what to say

                And no need to say anything, "Walter R.38" was never produced in this caliber. It is enough to look at its design to understand that it is physically impossible, because its dimensions will be the same as the aforementioned "Mars", and this is not needed by anyone.
                1. 0
                  12 March 2022 22: 06
                  Well, he was like a be! From there. I myself was in ah... Slight shock.
                  What happens at all
                  Well, you probably don’t know about TT for all possible cartridges?
                  1. 0
                    12 March 2022 23: 05
                    Well, you probably don’t know about TT for all possible cartridges?

                    Why do you think so? There is a lot of information about these models on the net, but I tried Tokagypt 58 under 9x19, the handle is more comfortable, and so - one hell. I am not a fan of Comrade Tokarev at all, in my opinion, he simply crippled the excellent system of John Browning.
                    1. 0
                      12 March 2022 23: 21
                      The market is not for that. I can hurt myself. The fact is that 45 Walter was. There were already 2 cartridges left in the store. I don't know whose glue. There are no photos or videos.
                      Just because you don't see God doesn't mean he doesn't exist.
                      1. +1
                        12 March 2022 23: 38
                        I won’t argue, it’s pointless, for me the question is completely obvious, or rather there is no question, just as there was no Walther P38 (Walter P38) pistol in 0.45 caliber (11.43mm.)
                  2. 0
                    13 March 2022 12: 08
                    "from there" from homemade? V. O was talking about some guy that amazes Luger. Perhaps someone imitated Karl
                    1. 0
                      13 March 2022 16: 31
                      Yes, not homemade. The build quality is wow!
                      The people who brought it were immediately aware that this was a wild exotic.
                      I honestly don't know who the manufacturer is.
          2. 0
            13 March 2022 11: 57
            "my grandfather TT", and father PM?
            1. 0
              13 March 2022 16: 27
              Pm is not in my hand. Doesn't lie :(
  3. +1
    12 March 2022 09: 03
    Thanks to the author for another article, the original butt of the "flight" pistol was amused, perhaps the shape of the butt made it possible to fire from a flying plane (who will understand these Tommy what )
    1. +3
      12 March 2022 09: 22
      He drew attention to the example. It’s understandable to use a holster as butts, but to carry a separate piece of wood with you? "pleasure" is something else.
      If on the first airplanes every gram counted and it was risky to move once again. Get this crap and slapstick, and who will manage, Pushkin?
  4. +1
    12 March 2022 09: 04
    Q. Oh, clarify this inconsistency: "'Even without cartridges, its weight reached. 1,430g", and now we read further: "MK 1" Marine "weight without cartridges 990g" some kind of nonsense turned out.
    Perhaps with cartridges the weight is 1,043g?
    1. +2
      12 March 2022 09: 09
      Quote: vladcub
      with cartridges weight 1,043g?

      We must see. So "offhand" I will not say.
      1. +2
        12 March 2022 10: 34
        Agree that without cartridges 990g and 1,043 without cartridges are not the same thing. It turns out 2 different pistols
  5. +3
    12 March 2022 10: 03
    hi
    Video about Webley Model 1904
    Write if it is reproduced in your area
    1. +2
      12 March 2022 10: 37
      Thank you, it’s reproduced, but I don’t “tooth with my foot” in English
      1. +3
        12 March 2022 10: 42
        Quote: vladcub
        I am not in English "tooth with a foot"

        Turn on titles with translation
        Settings (wheel) - Subtitles - On
        English - Translate - select from list
        Will translate somehow wink
    2. +1
      12 March 2022 14: 11
      Misha, hello and thank you. smile
      But with the translation of the problem - it throws ads on the window above the text of the comments, images from the ads appear, and the text of the video in English continues to go. "Technique suffixes" laughing Yes, okay, everything is clear there. drinks
      1. +2
        12 March 2022 14: 16
        Quote: Sea Cat
        throws ads on the window above the text of the comments

        For advertising in the Russian Federation - the sanctions of the capitalists do not apply laughing
        1. +1
          12 March 2022 14: 18
          It's a pity, advertising is probably the first thing I would throw out of public life.
          1. +2
            12 March 2022 14: 20
            Quote: Sea Cat
            advertising, this is probably the first thing I would throw out

            Advertising is one of my specialties.
            Do you want to leave me without a piece of bread?
            1. +3
              12 March 2022 14: 32
              You - by no means! Everyone needs to eat smile
              1. +2
                12 March 2022 16: 08
                Quote: Sea Cat
                Everyone needs to eat

                Especially in my case.
                I work in agriculture.
                And my country is agricultural
                1. 0
                  12 March 2022 16: 46
                  I wish you success in all respects, I hope that our countries will not "play around" with sanctions among themselves. drinks
                  1. +2
                    12 March 2022 17: 12
                    Quote: Sea Cat
                    I hope that our countries will not "dabble" with sanctions among themselves

                    Thank you!
                    I hope so too
                    Russia lifted restrictions, but how to deliver?
                    Ukrainian customs officers will confiscate our trucks.

                    Only passenger buses travel from Moldova to Russia.
                    Ticket price - as before for the plane (200 euros).
                    Detour to Ukraine: through Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, Czech Republic and Belarus.
                    I see logistics as golden
                    1. +1
                      12 March 2022 17: 18
                      There is only one way out for the benefit of all - our troops to go to Transnistria, and through it to receive goods from Moldova. I hope the politicians agree.
                      1. +2
                        12 March 2022 17: 22
                        Quote: Sea Cat
                        our troops to go to Transnistria

                        Duc for the PMR is also Ukraine wink
                        Moldova has 200 meters of coast at the mouth of the Danube
                        There really is an oil terminal, but maybe we can push a couple of inflatable boats with apples.
                        And there, and to Mother Russia, it’s not long to row wink
                      2. +1
                        12 March 2022 17: 26
                        but maybe we can shove a couple of inflatables with apples.

                        Good joke. smile But, I believe, the troops will still come out to the borders of Transnistria, there is nowhere to retreat, they climbed up to their ears.
                      3. +3
                        12 March 2022 17: 37
                        Quote: Sea Cat
                        There is nowhere to retreat, they climbed up to their ears.

                        So it will probably be.
                        Yes, and the Kadyrovites are just warming up, "beating with a hoof"
                      4. 0
                        12 March 2022 18: 49
                        Yes, these are eager to fight, but they are still being held for some reason. Strategic reserve? wink
                      5. +2
                        12 March 2022 21: 35
                        Quote: Sea Cat
                        Strategic reserve?

                        I think they are only sent to Azov and the like
                      6. 0
                        12 March 2022 21: 53
                        Yes, they themselves are set up for this, they still need to deal with some of "their" ones, "repay debts" by blood.
                    2. +1
                      12 March 2022 21: 04
                      I'm sorry, I thought you were in the States and wanted to help your career
        2. +2
          12 March 2022 21: 00
          Mikhail, "X" give Biden an idea: an advertising embargo.
          You see, the Democrats are respected and respected from the bottom.
          Or do you have no respect for DP?
          1. +1
            13 March 2022 09: 39
            Quote: vladcub
            give Biden an idea

            It would be more useful for this crazy grandfather to throw a laxative and sleeping pills.
            Nothing helps with dementia
            1. 0
              13 March 2022 11: 46
              Here is an infection, but I don’t have them. Thank God I'm getting around
  6. +3
    12 March 2022 10: 05
    Webley 1910 Pistol Prototype Video
  7. +1
    12 March 2022 10: 23
    Freaks ... They have problems with design. There is no comparison with the "Germans".
  8. +2
    12 March 2022 12: 13
    For the Russian Imperial Army, they did not produce anything like that.
    British generals "loved" revolvers, just like Russian ones.
  9. +2
    12 March 2022 18: 07
    hi
    although the design was very primitive

    By the way, a really strikingly ugly weapon, reminiscent of children's toys from the 70s or 80s of the 20th century.

  10. +1
    16 March 2022 00: 16
    Let me clarify.
    Figure caption:
    Pistol M1910. View from the left. Photo littlegun.be


    This is the M1908 model in .32 (7.65 mm).

    Mk I "Marine" issue of 1915. Left side view. Photo littlegun.be


    This is a Webley & Scott Mk. I No. 2.
    In 1915, a modified model of this pistol with the designation "Webley & Scott Pistol self-loading .455 Mark I No. 2" (Webley & Scott Mk. I No. 2) was approved for use in the Royal Air Service.
    Approved for use by the Royal Air Service, the Webley & Scott Mk. I No. 2 was also produced for the armament of the Royal Horse Artillery, where it was also used for a short time.

    But he had nothing to do with sailors


    Best regards,