Military Review

Russian uranium was not included in the list of energy carriers banned for import into the United States

114

Despite the statements of US President Joe Biden about the complete rejection of Russian energy carriers, some exceptions were still provided in Washington. The United States currently does not mine or process uranium, and they do not want to be left without nuclear fuel for their nuclear power plants.


The White House banned the import of Russian energy carriers, but "forgot" to include uranium there. This was announced by a senior official in the Biden administration. The thing is that at present the United States does not extract, produce or process nuclear fuel, being completely dependent on foreign supplies, half of which is provided by Russia, as well as Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. At the same time, Washington fears that by banning supplies from Russia, the United States will immediately lose both Kazakh and Uzbek uranium, since these countries are allies of Russia.

The US energy industry depends on Russia and its allies Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan for about half of the uranium used in US nuclear power plants.

- reports Reuters, citing a source.

At the same time, the publication tends to believe its source, since uranium is indeed not on the list of energy resources banned for import from Russia. Moreover, just a few days ago, a number of American companies representing the US nuclear industry turned to Biden with a request not to include Russian uranium in the list of sanctions, otherwise the entire industry would "just lie down."

Recall that on Tuesday, March 8, the United States announced a ban on the supply of Russian energy, primarily oil. The ban has already led to a sharp rise in gasoline prices, but Biden vowed to "minimize the damage."
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/POTUS
114 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov 9 March 2022 09: 41
    +18
    Russian uranium was not included in the list of prohibited imports into the United States

    ***
    That is, if you bomb it, it will not be a violation of sanctions? ...
    (Actually, I am peaceful, I could not restrain myself)
    ***
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 9 March 2022 09: 46
      +28
      I think, "she's dead, she's dead." cut the tails. The sooner the "negotiations" will begin.
      1. Giant thought
        Giant thought 9 March 2022 09: 48
        +49
        Now it's our turn to impose sanctions and leave mattresses without our uranium.
        1. gansales
          gansales 9 March 2022 09: 56
          +7
          Quote: Giant thought
          Now it's our turn to impose sanctions and leave mattresses without our uranium.

          By the way, there are also quite a few uranium deposits on the Outskirts ..
          The mattress is cunning .. I think by the summer all these sanctions will come to naught .. They surrendered Nazi Ukraine, because they themselves have lost control, like with igil on BV
          Russians know how to deal quickly with any evil spirits!
          1. astepanov
            astepanov 9 March 2022 10: 32
            +17
            Quote from gansales
            there are also quite a few uranium deposits on the outskirts ..

            So what? Uranium is still in many places, for example, in Australia and Africa. The main problem for mattresses is the lack of serious facilities for enrichment and outdated technologies. Russia is the main supplier of enriched uranium to the United States. The strangest thing about all of this is that we seem to be supplying fuel to their nuclear fleet, including the submarine. Or I'm wrong? Is there anyone familiar with the situation and able to clarify? If everything is as I suppose, then probably the ends need to be cut immediately.
            1. gansales
              gansales 9 March 2022 11: 39
              +6
              Quote: astepanov
              The strangest thing about all this is that we seem to be supplying fuel to their nuclear fleet, including the submarine. Or I'm wrong? Is there anyone familiar with the situation and able to clarify? If everything is as I suppose, then probably the ends need to be cut immediately.

              Along the way, it is ... EBN they remember the entire stock of plutonium (accumulated by the USSR) just gave away the drunk ..
              It's time to collect stones and decide with the USA .. ENEMIES they are to us! And no longer "partners" ..
              But first, Russia needs to be cleared of their "idols" in our media, and so on. ..
              Russia must be updated from bloodsuckers of all stripes!
              1. Shurik70
                Shurik70 9 March 2022 19: 42
                0
                The US does not currently mine or process uranium

                Stop ...
                Indeed, since 2014, Kyiv has been saying all the time that they do not need Russian uranium for their nuclear power plants, they will buy it perfectly in the USA ...
                Is it not only gas, "European" bought, which Europe bought from Russia, but also with uranium the same parsley?
                fool
        2. mitroha
          mitroha 9 March 2022 10: 07
          +2
          The United States will immediately lose both Kazakh and Uzbek uranium, since these countries are allies of Russia

          Knowing the "multi-vector nature" of the leadership of these countries, it is unlikely ...
          1. pin_code
            pin_code 9 March 2022 10: 29
            +4
            Give every Russian from Kazakhstan an apartment or a house, and who will produce it? There .. About Kazakhstan. Where I lived, mine No. 2 worked industrially (another 1,3,4 reconnaissance grp92).
          2. sifgame
            sifgame 9 March 2022 10: 49
            +1
            In Kazakhstan, Rosatom is tightly seated, you just can’t fit in there.
        3. zloybond
          zloybond 9 March 2022 10: 13
          +44
          A statement by our Foreign Ministry would be quite appropriate. Like, we understand the concerns of the USH and therefore, meeting the wishes of the mattress president, we added uranium, which they forgot to include, to the list of energy carriers that the United States refused. And we completely stop deliveries of this product to the USS at their request.... We promise to continue to move in the spirit of complete mutual understanding and meet all the wishes of our overseas partners... It would be enchanting, in the spirit of partnership, mutual understanding. drinks
          1. Login_Off
            Login_Off 10 March 2022 06: 51
            0
            I can add another reason.
            In response to the development of biological weapons. According to our information, with a high degree of probability, the United States was developing biological weapons in violation of all norms and prohibitions. Also, with a high degree of probability, the United States helped Ukraine in the development of nuclear weapons.
            Why not a reason?! Why lag behind, it is necessary to impose sanctions for direct reasons!

            Let them prove later that this is not the case!
        4. Starover_Z
          Starover_Z 9 March 2022 10: 26
          +5
          Quote: Giant thought
          Now it's our turn to impose sanctions and leave mattresses without our uranium.

          the US does not currently mine, produce, or reprocess nuclear fuel, being entirely dependent on foreign supplies, half of which is provided by Russia, as well as Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. At the same time, Washington fears that by banning supplies from Russia, the United States will immediately lose both Kazakh and Uzbek uranium, since these countries are Russia's allies.

          "Since such a booze has gone - cut the last cucumber!"
          In this case, raise the price of uranium to the maximum!
          And what, they can do everything, but we can’t?!
          1. 12.7
            12.7 9 March 2022 16: 06
            0
            They have a printing press. They will pay, they will also laugh. They will feel only if the supply stops.
        5. AlexTss
          AlexTss 9 March 2022 11: 43
          +5
          Why so cruel? recourse
          Let them dress clean - in 20 minutes there will be uranium bully
        6. Nyrobsky
          Nyrobsky 9 March 2022 11: 48
          +6
          Quote: Giant thought
          Now it's our turn to impose sanctions and leave mattresses without our uranium.

          Yesterday, Putin instructed the government to prepare within 2 days a list of products, goods and energy carriers prohibited from being delivered to unfriendly countries. So the day after tomorrow we will find out whether the mattresses were lucky or not. Something tells us that most likely they will be left without our uranium. Alaverdi, it is.
        7. grandfather_Kostya
          grandfather_Kostya 9 March 2022 12: 52
          +1
          Sell ​​uranium, but only for rubles through sub-sanctioned banks with an exchange of 1 ruble per bag of hundred-dollar bills.
          1. engineer74
            engineer74 9 March 2022 14: 05
            +1
            Quote: grandfather_Kostya
            Sell ​​uranium, but only for rubles through sub-sanctioned banks with an exchange of 1 ruble per bag of hundred-dollar bills.

            Then better highly enriched, from an online auction lol
            Who for the nuclear power plant will then debauch, who for the protection of sovereignty, and who for ... wink
          2. cat Rusich
            cat Rusich 9 March 2022 21: 50
            0
            Quote: grandfather_Kostya
            Sell ​​uranium, but only for rubles through sub-sanctioned banks with an exchange of 1 ruble per bag of hundred-dollar bills.
            If you sell, then only for gold.
            But in this case Uranium strategic raw materials and sell them only to those countries that recognize Crimea as an integral part of Russia.
        8. Mylenef
          Mylenef 9 March 2022 12: 59
          0
          Duc, after all, they refused our oil, let them refuse uranium
        9. Machito
          Machito 9 March 2022 13: 03
          +2
          Quote: Giant thought
          Now it's our turn to impose sanctions and leave mattresses without our uranium.

          Without ours, it is Russian, Kazakh and Uzbek.
          Let them drown with dung. laughing lol good Or dollars.
          Total economic war is a good gift for Eurofascists.
          And then, sanctions are introduced here, but they are not imposed here.
          Let the rogue around the world. am Let them heat their homes with intellectual property, swifts, bitcoins and other derivatives. Derevative - from the word tree, that is, firewood. laughing lol wassat
        10. alystan
          alystan 9 March 2022 16: 15
          0
          But there is also Ukrainian and Kazakh uranium. And if everything will have to end with the first in the near future for the striped ones, then difficulties may arise with the second, because. its extraction and sale is largely in the hands of Westerners, mainly small-shaven people ("thanks" to Nazarbayev's adviser Tony Blair). But this issue, in principle, can be solved.
          But the most important thing, it seems to me, is the "complexity" of making a decision to ban the sale of Russian uranium to the United States in Russia itself. By whom and at what level, probably, and so it is clear to everyone.
        11. Captain Pushkin
          Captain Pushkin 11 March 2022 09: 14
          0
          Until their tail is pinched, they will not stop in their sanctions. And you need to do as much pain as possible. Uranus, the very thing that will get them.
      2. Evil543
        Evil543 9 March 2022 10: 08
        +8
        Did I miss something. Have we already announced retaliatory sanctions? Or are we just analyzing?
        1. Egoza
          Egoza 9 March 2022 10: 18
          +7
          Quote: Evil543
          Have we already announced retaliatory sanctions? Or are we just analyzing?

          And why is it always only "reciprocal" sanctions? It may be enough to "mirror". Let them look for measures for the "mirror". Go Russia!
        2. NDR-791
          NDR-791 9 March 2022 10: 38
          +5
          Quote: Evil543
          Did I miss something. Have we already announced retaliatory sanctions? Or are we just analyzing?

          The unnamed gave the government TWO days to analyze the ban on the supply of strategic resources to the "bad boy countries." Let's wait, maybe we'll start cutting the tails in the normal way.
          1. wakedcat5
            wakedcat5 9 March 2022 11: 08
            +4
            Yep, up to the neck.
        3. astepanov
          astepanov 9 March 2022 10: 52
          0
          Quote: Evil543
          Have we already announced retaliatory sanctions?

          And how, and the most terrible. I demand from the EU, the USA and personally from the main English old woman to immediately abandon the sanctions against the most vulnerable Russians, order bearers Usmanov, Roman Abramovich and their other colleagues and return the confiscated yachts with apologies to the best people in the country !!. And let the Spanish kinglet return the villas to Solovyov! A person may have nowhere to live! Raiders are bad!
        4. bk316
          bk316 10 March 2022 12: 56
          0
          So far, only Roscosmos
    2. Vend
      Vend 9 March 2022 10: 10
      +11
      Yes, who would doubt laughing Everything is possible at someone else's expense laughing Fight to the last Ukrainian, impose sanctions to the last European laughing
  2. Alsur
    Alsur 9 March 2022 09: 44
    +5
    Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
    Russian uranium was not included in the list of prohibited imports into the United States

    ***
    That is, if you bomb it, it will not be a violation of sanctions? ...
    (In general, I am peaceful, I could not restrain myself)
    ***

    Apparently, these will be accelerated deliveries, due to the complex logistics of uranium supplies to the United States from Russia at the present time.
    1. Vladimir_2U
      Vladimir_2U 9 March 2022 10: 15
      +3
      Quote: ALSur
      accelerated deliveries

      Like "Light and warmth in every home in the United States"? laughing
      1. Starover_Z
        Starover_Z 9 March 2022 10: 28
        +2
        Quote: Vladimir_2U
        Quote: ALSur
        accelerated deliveries

        Like "Light and warmth in every home in the United States"? laughing

        Specify GPS coordinates! First, the exact White House and the Capitol!
        1. Paranoid50
          Paranoid50 9 March 2022 10: 51
          +3
          Quote: Starover_Z
          Specify GPS coordinates!

          The coordinates have long been entered. yes wink
        2. wakedcat5
          wakedcat5 9 March 2022 11: 12
          +2
          Well, what do you, my friend, use the bourgeois system? Only GLONASS! And, in case of scatter, increase to 50 megatons of TNT equivalent.
  3. ALEXX.
    ALEXX. 9 March 2022 09: 46
    +12
    So we urgently need to ban the supply of uranium to America.
    1. Sir Galant
      Sir Galant 9 March 2022 09: 47
      +2
      definitely!
    2. krops777
      krops777 9 March 2022 09: 53
      +7
      So we urgently need to ban the supply of uranium to America.


      Yes, why, just inflate the price of the missing oil profits. laughing
    3. -z-
      -z- 9 March 2022 10: 09
      +4
      And you can sell in the same dollars at the dollar = ruble exchange rate today.
  4. Amateur
    Amateur 9 March 2022 09: 48
    +10
    Again
    money does not smell

    Russia should ban exports to the US of absolutely EVERYTHING!.
    1. Disant
      Disant 9 March 2022 10: 07
      -7
      Amateur (Victor)
      Russia should ban exports to the US of absolutely EVERYTHING!.

      it's amateurish.
      then I will personally enroll in the guardsmen, come for you and write you 365 labor hours a year, an hour per day of working off, since the janitor and public utilities in my area have nothing and out of nowhere will pay.
      do you agree with this decision?
      1. Amateur
        Amateur 9 March 2022 10: 11
        +3
        it's amateurish.
        then I will personally enroll in the guardsmen, come for you and write you 365 hours of work a year, an hour per day of working off, since the janitor in my area will have nothing and will not be paid from anywhere.

        Was it about you that Lavrov said his famous phrase?
        On my own behalf, I can add that your "extract" will first be torn off, then put back on, but on the other side.
        1. Disant
          Disant 9 March 2022 10: 19
          -5
          oh yes you are rude.
          and I just modulated for you the situation that will arise with your
          TOTAL
          and you are no longer yourself.
          here and think and think
      2. Dali
        Dali 9 March 2022 10: 27
        +2
        Quote: Disant
        do you agree with this decision?

        1st, if anything, then you yourself will clean up in your yard, and the amateur in his.
        2nd, it makes sense to sell, but only really more expensive if there is an opportunity to buy through 3rd hands, because it will also have to be more expensive to buy.
        3rd, what's the point in these numbers on the accounts, if they don't sell us the required material resources on them over the hill. Then it is necessary to sell not for bucks-euro, but for yuan, for gold, platinum, precious minerals and other rare earth minerals, synthesized minerals, technologies, scientific developments ... etc.
        1. Disant
          Disant 9 March 2022 10: 44
          -2
          Dali, you are great, thank you for your support.
          on the first point - urgently write amateurso that he prepares hand tools for cleaning (until the price rises) - I’m telegraphing - you don’t need to go to me, let him get ready to clean up in his yard.
          let me clarify with you who will pay for the light in the city and clean the roads NOT IN THE YARDS? (the city budget suddenly became small)
          it’s just that if again I (the inhabitants of the yards), then large hand-held snow scrapers are expensive and the personnel have already been sent to harvest firewood - to light the streets. Can I ask you for money for metal for scrapers and manpower for digging roadways to the city?
          Your second point is incomprehensible to me, and no one argues with the third.
          1. Dali
            Dali 9 March 2022 21: 55
            0
            Quote: Disant
            let me clarify with you who will pay for the light in the city and clean the roads NOT IN THE YARDS? (the city budget suddenly became small)

            The question is somewhat meaningless, because the budget will be different ... while Russia is printing rubles, yes, perhaps the range of goods will be smaller, but we won’t die of hunger, we won’t freeze from the cold, we won’t go naked.
            Or you without iPhones, iPads, etc. etc. ...life isn't sweet anymore?

            And what is not clear in the second paragraph - there is so far to sell goods and services from Russia (notice, and then only point 3) it only makes sense in this situation, if only it is expensive and for the money received it will be possible to buy goods over the hill, otherwise what us their euros and dollars.
            1. Disant
              Disant 10 March 2022 14: 46
              -1
              The question is somewhat meaningless, because the budget will be different ... rubles while Russia prints

              Issues
              more
              not
              I have
      3. bk316
        bk316 10 March 2022 12: 57
        +1
        then I will personally enroll in the oprichniki

        Yes, you don’t wait, you come right now, the guardsman pancake was found ....
        1. Disant
          Disant 10 March 2022 14: 53
          -2
          you will have a pancake, bold prohibitors of the export of everything!
          you first read what they write, and then blink.
          after such slogans, then the whole city will knit brooms from the neighboring forest instead of the lost titanium markets and trade in Rosatom products!
          and all your relatives will receive a pension from them!
          .
          sounds like hell)
          wake up
          1. bk316
            bk316 10 March 2022 15: 14
            +2
            Markets, benefits, brooms.... Wake up the world has changed. The global project is over. In 5 years there will be no world reserve currency. In 20 years there will be a global energy shortage. Uranium, titanium, oil, gas, we all need it ourselves. The state finally realized that trinkets for the Papuans are prohibitively expensive.
            1. Disant
              Disant 11 March 2022 03: 34
              -2
              In 20 years there will be a global energy shortage. Uranium, titanium, oil, gas, we all need it ourselves.

              Gas
              yes, in Taimyr alone, with the current level of gas production for 100 years from those fields from which production is already underway. then, after 100 years, you can let the explorers go further
              The whole of Siberia is a solid coal basin, just stretch the railway and mine it. Coal is the feedstock for gas production, you just need to create conditions

              Titanium
              produced in the world exactly as much as the industry needs. need more - will produce more. and if supplies are banned, they will dig a hole in another place on the Earth for mining and will earn money in another place, but not in Russia, and you, I insist, will get only knitting brooms from a neighboring forest.
              About what global projects you write - I do not understand.
              I'm talking about brooms, about your salary, about the most mundane - and you hang some global dogs on me.
              .
              Uran
              what is wrong with him?
              We don't sell uranium ore! And the nuclear power plant is assembled! above such products - only stars! and ban it?
              Uranium ore + mining of old nuclear power plants, already in stock for processing, - calculated - we will have enough for 800 years of operation of nuclear power plants using new fuel
              what deficit are you talking about?
              .
              oil - yes, reserves, available for extractionare falling, but technology is not standing still.
              replacements - the sea.
              you can drill deeper, you can explore and discover new deposits (new methods of exploration are on the nose), you can switch to an alternative - hydrogen.

              In 20 years there will be a global energy shortage.

              you are in a hurry - there is a sea of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbenergy around.
              .
              You can hang my comment in a frame on the wall in your apartment - use it. this is for you personally from me - a squeeze of insider information.
              .
              1. bk316
                bk316 11 March 2022 13: 11
                0
                Gas ... hang in a frame

                Can you hang something somewhere?
                You are a boy, at least look with whom you are piping, I have explored these deposits. And remember, Gazprom's confirmed gas reserves at the current level of production will last for 30 years AND ALL.
                https://sustainability.gazpromreport.ru/
                Yes, but they are mostly hard-to-recover.
                1. Disant
                  Disant 11 March 2022 14: 17
                  -1
                  You are a boy, at least looked with whom piriyou write, I explored these deposits.

                  respect and praise to you. but if you are not Miller, then your skills, knowledge and skills cannot affect your statement in any way - I trust my information more, uncle
                  Can you hang something somewhere?

                  I have. but you, since these same reserves were explored or were somehow at least marginally involved, would read the annual report. By the way, it is in your link and almost completely confirms my words.
                  please read:
                  https://sustainability.gazpromreport.ru/2020/3-about-gazprom/annex/#c4960
                  Key operating indicators of Gazprom Group, 2017–2020
                  Proven and probable gas reserves, bcm
                  24 521,0
                  annual production of 450 billion.
                  that is, only one Gazprom for 55 years of gas. well, let it be for 50 years - something is not extracted.
                  but besides Gazprom, there are fields that are not registered with him.
                  Even Rosgeo and the Ministry of Natural Resources differ by 30 years in their estimates of reserves. Of course, who will say - this is classified information, auditors write what they are told from above - who will disclose commercial and state secrets.
                  and even in the report you have given, the figures do not beat with the report of the chairman (immediately!) - by at least 20 percent.
                  or do you offer me to send you field maps?
                  .
                  on oil, titanium, uranium, as I understand it, you have no objections.
                  And I'm glad I was able to convince you a little.
                  .
                  ps
                  do not forget about brooms, you still have to go to the bathhouse with them
                  1. bk316
                    bk316 11 March 2022 14: 46
                    +1
                    I trust my information more, uncle

                    I don't actually teach for free, but okay, today is Friday.
                    Let's start with a simple one, in order to understand you are just a balabol copy-pasting from a wiki, or at least you understand in this area, you studied and worked ....
                    From you
                    1. A short essay of 2-3 paragraphs on the topic of what is explored reserves. Why are their sizes different?
                    2. What is c1 in the context of paragraph 1.
                    3. And which indices are used to evaluate a deposit in terms of reserves. Question for 4+: the formula for the total assessment of the field for these indices.

                    Anyone who is somehow versed in this area will answer immediately without digging on the Internet. Time has gone....
                    1. Disant
                      Disant 11 March 2022 17: 33
                      -1
                      oh, I was out.
                      just balabol copy-pasting from wiki

                      I like you for your awareness, but still it turns out that you are again another rude person. or a brute.
                      continue.
                      about copy-paste - you yourself gave me a link, there are a lot of documents, but I found the numbers for you in the report and the report of the head of the company and showed you them in comparison, and they don’t even fight among themselves (for production - by 20 percent). the head of the company writes other numbers.
                      more.
                      you are trying to teach me a lesson above for some reason, but you yourself do not understand the meaning already written me to you on the topic of gas reserves.
                      .
                      I will write again, maybe you just read it wrong:
                      IT DOES NOT MATTER what is the lag in the reserves of this or that field,
                      IT DOES NOT MATTER by what method or way you plan to mine it -
                      MORE LESS ACCURATE GENERALIZED DATA ON RESERVES IS PRIVATE INFORMATION,
                      and you, even if you have at least seven spans in your forehead, will be mistaken at times.
                      .
                      so I clearly wrote that
                      recoverable reserves fall
                      . and this fact is indisputable.
                      I substantiated my words - about 100 years of reserves - with your own Gazprom reports (50 years), plus the same amount was added to this - these are more or less real numbers. although more are attributed. and it's not from your beloved wiki. and this is far from 30 years old, as you write.
                      Are you obsessed with Gazprom??
                      Novatek is also mined. and Rosneft and Surgutneftegaz.
                      Taimyr is not someone's fiefdom
                      1. bk316
                        bk316 11 March 2022 18: 39
                        +1
                        about copy-paste - you yourself gave me a link, there are a lot of documents,

                        of course, unlike you, I don’t copy-paste, but I give proofs, and the correct ones and not the wiki. The thing is that it is not enough to know where the information lies, you need to understand what is written there. You do not understand. The control questions were not answered, although they are elementary. Keep writing nonsense thinking that you are at least a little bit right, I am not interested in corresponding on any topic with a person with zero knowledge. Be healthy.
                      2. Disant
                        Disant 11 March 2022 20: 10
                        +1
                        You do not understand. Control questions not answered

                        Here's another sign for you. already at the door. donate
                        CONTROLLER!
                        before you control, learn to talk
  5. riwas
    riwas 9 March 2022 09: 51
    +4
    Russian uranium was not included in the list of energy carriers banned for import into the United States

    In war as in war. Russia has a trump card, why not use it.
    1. Disant
      Disant 9 March 2022 10: 12
      0
      trump cards are protected.
      go learn to play the fool
      1. Dali
        Dali 9 March 2022 10: 29
        +1
        Quote: Disant
        trump cards are protected.

        And in the end they use it.
        1. Disant
          Disant 9 March 2022 11: 23
          +2
          And in the end they use it.

          And what is the end already?
          in the game "fool" it is not necessary to discard (beat) all the cards - at the end of the game, after the last set of cards, one of the players can simply admit his loss without playing further. and this is a much more valuable victory.
          .
          and you will agree, to fight back with trump aces (titanium, uranium, the prohibition of "ALL") at the beginning of the game, as many here advise - this is stupid.
          do you agree?
  6. Vovanych007
    Vovanych007 9 March 2022 09: 52
    +6
    And here it should be banned for export to the United States. If they abruptly removed it from sanctions, then there is nothing to replace our uranium with. And there is nowhere else to buy it. Let them howl, jackals.
  7. sheet
    sheet 9 March 2022 09: 53
    -3
    So it will hit. After 2 days.
  8. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 9 March 2022 09: 54
    +3
    Despite the statements of US President Joe Biden about the complete rejection of Russian energy carriers, some exceptions were still provided in Washington. The United States currently does not mine or process uranium, and they do not want to be left without nuclear fuel for their nuclear power plants.

    Everything is as always, that is, all my life: "Disrespectful Russians, as always, we play according to our Anglo-Saxon rules, we can’t offer you anything else, you are outcasts and .... (they will say a lot more about Russians)"
  9. aleks26
    aleks26 9 March 2022 09: 55
    +7
    Well, there is uranium in Australia, Canada. It's probably enriched uranium. And it is neither in Canada, nor in Australia, nor in Kazakhstan, nor in Uzbekistan. The Americans themselves are building an enrichment factory, but it will not work soon. So Russia can bite amers.
    1. akropin
      akropin 9 March 2022 10: 18
      +3
      So Russia can bite amers

      Apparently even bend over. And I do not think that the team that is now working under the President is not capable of such a step.

      In fact, our enriched uranium is the cost of electricity in the US. If it does not exist, then the cost of everything there will increase not at times, but by a significant percentage. And this is a real economic bomb. The consequences of the "explosion" I think are now being calculated.
    2. Disant
      Disant 9 March 2022 11: 32
      0
      The Americans themselves are building an enrichment factory

      Do they have competencies?
  10. Victor Dubovitsky
    Victor Dubovitsky 9 March 2022 09: 56
    +8
    I wrote about this before, I repeat once again - this omission of the Americans must be corrected on our part. And it turns out to be strange - they selectively ban, but they write - totally. It's not good to cheat. Add titanium to nuclear materials and everything that they would like to have at low Russian prices.
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 9 March 2022 10: 55
      0
      Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
      it turns out strange - selectively ban, but they write - totally.

      Our whole life is sometimes one continuous oddity. yes In our yard, thirty years ago, someone wrote "Viktor Tsoi" on the door of the janitor's room. So after that, no matter how many times I went there, I never met Tsoi. Strange, isn't it? request wassat
  11. aleks26
    aleks26 9 March 2022 09: 57
    +1
    Moreover, they need it, including for their nuclear component.
  12. rocket757
    rocket757 9 March 2022 10: 00
    +3
    Russian uranium was not included in the list of energy carriers banned for import into the United States
    . This is understandable, in order to change the supplier, it is necessary to build processing plants.
    The price of the issue matters, and you can’t do it quickly.
    Now the options ... will wait for them to grow together and then ....
    Those. FIG knows how it will be then.
  13. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 9 March 2022 10: 02
    +5
    Biden allegedly went to meet the American nuclear scientists, otherwise of course ...
    The United States announced a ban on Russian energy supplies, primarily oil
    But at the same time, they immediately give advice to their companies on how to circumvent their own sanctions. And pliable-serving Europe is preparing a 4th package of sanctions threatening with heavenly punishments, but at the same time both Germany and France have withdrawn Russian energy carriers from sanctions. This means that Russia needs to be put under economic pressure, but at the same time the latter is obliged to supply oil and gas to Europe.
  14. The popuas
    The popuas 9 March 2022 10: 07
    +4
    So they wanted to tear off Kazakhstan .. They wanted to prepare, but it didn’t pass
  15. blackcat
    blackcat 9 March 2022 10: 07
    +2
    Well, that means he should appear on our sanctions lists.
  16. LAWNER
    LAWNER 9 March 2022 10: 09
    +5
    Sanctions on the supply of uranium for US nuclear power plants will definitely finish off the country's economy. The enrichment of American ore is carried out on the territory of the Russian Federation. But its supplies are prohibited by law. They came up with the idea of ​​​​selling a Canadian ore mining company to our country. (enriched) into fuel. In other words, to body. And only we had such a technology. As a result, it ended. The processing of ore into fuel by American technologies costs 50 times more energy than Russian ones. And production is 12 times more expensive. As a result, two American companies in this industry are working at minimums. Accordingly, scientists fled. Employees also ...
    And in the aggregate of all these adventures, the United States cannot shoot itself in the foot. At least 5-10 years.
    1. dr.kharin
      dr.kharin 9 March 2022 10: 22
      +2
      Uranium One America's came under the control of Rosatom structures. And this is the leading company in the US market. Only American politicians think they own the world. It hasn't been the same for a long time.
    2. Brturin
      Brturin 9 March 2022 12: 29
      0
      Quote: LAWNER
      for the supply of uranium for US nuclear power plants

      Is it only for US nuclear power plants - the same Westinghouse supplies fuel to other countries, the question is whose enriched uranium is in these assemblies ... the states do not refuse, but they themselves actively promote the refusal of others ....
      The Swedish company Vattenfall abandoned the Russian planned supply of Russian nuclear fuel for local nuclear power plants. In 2016, Vattenfall signed contracts for the supply of nuclear fuel with Russian TVEL, French Areva and American Westinghouse. https://neftegaz.ru/news/nuclear/727136-vattenfall-iz-shvetsii-ne-budet-zakupat-rossiyskoe-yadernoe-fuel-dlya-aes/
      the only question is whose fuel
      The Oskarshamn-3 reactor, the most powerful of all installed at Swedish nuclear power plants, has been temporarily decommissioned due to fuel damage. This was reported on Thursday by the TV channel SVT. https://tass.ru/ekonomika/13673365
  17. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 9 March 2022 10: 15
    +1
    Well, they used to say the same about rd180 engines and titanium. Uranium ... It seems that RosAtom is already making square TVELs ... In principle, they are still not fed enough to have a strong effect. They're off the hook.
  18. Dikson
    Dikson 9 March 2022 10: 17
    +3
    Great .. if only it didn’t work out, as under Chernomyrdin ..- We give them enriched uranium, and they give us McDonald’s and Coca-Cola ..
    1. Emergency
      Emergency 9 March 2022 10: 27
      +3
      McDonald's is winding down. You have to develop your own. It's probably for the best. The people will be healthier.
      1. Dikson
        Dikson 9 March 2022 11: 35
        +2
        I mean, we are strategic raw materials for them, and they are glass beads for us, like the Papuans ..
  19. Bad Pig (Ham)
    Bad Pig (Ham) 9 March 2022 10: 21
    0
    The thing is that at present the United States does not extract, produce or process nuclear fuel, being completely dependent on foreign supplies.

    here they are, here they are...
    it turns out the "exceptional" super-hyper-turbo superpower does not have nuclear technology ...
    and the king is naked!
    1. XNUMX%
      XNUMX% 9 March 2022 11: 09
      +1
      They need to raise their prices. Urgently and without options. Across the throat so that they get this uranium.
  20. Emergency
    Emergency 9 March 2022 10: 25
    0
    Maybe it's time for us to make our own lists, or is it too early? Uranium, titanium, etc. Motors are already banned.
  21. XNUMX%
    XNUMX% 9 March 2022 10: 26
    0
    Russian uranium was not included in the list of energy carriers banned for import into the United States

    That's right. Now we urgently need to raise prices for all this ... without any principle at all ... for the sake of democracy in America.
    1. Emergency
      Emergency 9 March 2022 10: 59
      +2
      In the State Duma, talks began for the sale of energy resources for rubles. Delyagin also offered to trade uranium for rubles. Buried all around, however. winked They hit us with sanctions, and we will crush them with the ruble.
      1. XNUMX%
        XNUMX% 9 March 2022 11: 06
        -1
        Right. Now for Europe, the fairy tale about porridge needs to be played out. ... "Good porridge, if only I could add more cereals ..." lol We will do this - we will not be lost.
  22. Vikxnumx
    Vikxnumx 9 March 2022 10: 27
    0
    Supply U 235 in 50 kg ingots... Collect ingots in the USA.
    1. XNUMX%
      XNUMX% 9 March 2022 11: 16
      -1
      Waste them two barges should be delivered directly to their coast. Scrape off what they already piled up in Chernobyl and put it up. Let the bitches die.
  23. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 9 March 2022 10: 27
    +3
    Russian uranium was not included in the list of energy carriers banned for import into the United States

    And Russia is simply obliged to eliminate this omission ...
    It's OK. Let me mine uranium in biolaboratories...
    By the way, the United States simply ruled out any methods and attempts to check the activities of its biolaboratories on the territory of other countries. I'm guessing that we can learn a lot of interesting things by capturing one of them ... Directly under the recording on the air ...
    And then they diligently assure us that encephalitis has been known since the time of King Peas, and bird, swine and other flus appeared right along with these animals ...
    However, microbiologists say that for hundreds of years, viruses have not undergone serious mutations, and only the last ten years there has been a suspicious surge in the activity of this biomass.
    Details are on the Karaulov Platform...
  24. Myths
    Myths 9 March 2022 10: 35
    0
    Quote: Dali
    Quote: Disant
    do you agree with this decision?

    1st, if anything, then you yourself will clean up in your yard, and the amateur in his.
    2nd, it makes sense to sell, but only really more expensive if there is an opportunity to buy through 3rd hands, because it will also have to be more expensive to buy.
    3rd, what's the point in these numbers on the accounts, if they don't sell us the required material resources on them over the hill. Then it is necessary to sell not for bucks-euro, but for yuan, for gold, platinum, precious minerals and other rare earth minerals, synthesized minerals, technologies, scientific developments ... etc.

    You have to sell for rubles ...
    1. lisiy prapor
      lisiy prapor 9 March 2022 14: 01
      -1
      Quote from Mitos
      You have to sell for rubles ...

      Those who sell do not need rubles, they are going to retire on the Cote d'Azur, and there rubles are unnecessarily. For more than 30 years, have you not caught up with the top of Russia, the interests of this very Russia (the people) to one place?
  25. Myths
    Myths 9 March 2022 10: 37
    +2
    Quote: Bad Pig (Ham)
    The thing is that at present the United States does not extract, produce or process nuclear fuel, being completely dependent on foreign supplies.

    here they are, here they are...
    it turns out the "exceptional" super-hyper-turbo superpower does not have nuclear technology ...
    and the king is naked!

    It has, but why waste this resource if it goes to the defense industry and it is not enough anyway.
    1. lisiy prapor
      lisiy prapor 9 March 2022 14: 12
      -1
      Quote from Mitos
      It has, but why waste this resource if it goes to the defense industry and it is not enough anyway.

      Because Russia is building nuclear power plants all over the world, with the exception of Russia itself. We are limited to the construction of temples. More temples!
  26. archiroll
    archiroll 9 March 2022 10: 43
    0
    I hope it hits...
  27. Rostislav
    Rostislav 9 March 2022 10: 45
    +1
    I hope that Russia will be able to prepare a worthy answer - titanium, artificial sapphires, uranium, gas (this is for Europe), potash, wheat, etc.
    But not to ban supplies, but to offer to keep them in exchange for the lifting of sanctions on our list. It is unlikely that they will fall for the threat of such measures, so it will be necessary to first "turn off the tap" and later, when they feel the consequences and become more accommodating, return to the topic of mutual concessions.
  28. APASUS
    APASUS 9 March 2022 11: 00
    +2
    That's just Uranium and it was necessary to ban the sale in the USA. Uranium reserves are not large on the planet and you can always sell it. Yes, and it will fit at our nuclear power plants
  29. vlad forged
    vlad forged 9 March 2022 11: 09
    +1
    Mean to ban deliveries
  30. Bear
    Bear 9 March 2022 11: 24
    +1
    Missile deliveries to the US U-235. Fast and inexpensive. Strategic Missile Forces of the Russian Federation.
  31. burigaz2010
    burigaz2010 9 March 2022 11: 39
    0
    Yes, damn it, either take off your underpants or put on a cross
  32. know
    know 9 March 2022 11: 55
    0
    And here we see Putin's traditional game of giveaway with his "partners": he does not take advantage of opportunities, gives them time to prepare, to find alternative sources. Just a week ago, the refusal to supply oil to the United States would have been considered by everyone as a very strong blow. But Putin did not inflict it - he gave the Americans the opportunity to conspire behind our backs with Iran and Venezuela. The same for gas supplied to Europe. In Europe, a political decision has already been made to completely phase out Russian gas by 2030. By supplying gas now, Putin is enabling European Russophobes to find new suppliers and new supply routes. Introducing a supply ban right now - literally brings Europe to its knees and forces it to negotiate. There's nothing left to lose anyway. And time in this case works against Russia.
    1. lisiy prapor
      lisiy prapor 9 March 2022 14: 15
      0
      Well, Duc, relatives need to live somewhere and on something.
  33. -Paul-
    -Paul- 9 March 2022 11: 56
    0
    Well, then it is necessary from our side to ban the supply of uranium. She died, so she died.
  34. Slavake
    Slavake 9 March 2022 12: 01
    0
    I would ban uranium for America.
    1. lisiy prapor
      lisiy prapor 9 March 2022 14: 18
      0
      You probably have no relatives in America, and bank accounts, most likely laughing
  35. Victor Dubovitsky
    Victor Dubovitsky 9 March 2022 12: 40
    0
    Quote: Paranoid50
    Quote: Victor Dubovitsky
    it turns out strange - selectively ban, but they write - totally.

    Our whole life is sometimes one continuous oddity. yes In our yard, thirty years ago, someone wrote "Viktor Tsoi" on the door of the janitor's room. So after that, no matter how many times I went there, I never met Tsoi. Strange, isn't it? request wassat

    How can you meet Tsoi without ever going there? Here's the weird thing. At least you should have looked. Make sure.
  36. kill the fascist
    kill the fascist 9 March 2022 12: 56
    0
    It is necessary that uranium also be included in this list, but at the initiative of Russia. In war as in war.
  37. Ros 56
    Ros 56 9 March 2022 14: 15
    -1
    So it didn’t hit them, and not only uranium should fall into our counter-sanctions, there is probably something else there.
  38. polk26l
    polk26l 9 March 2022 14: 26
    0
    Well, too bad it didn't hit! And it would be necessary that it hit, like rare earth metals, and nickel, and freon, and much more that the United States and NATO countries need for their strategic industry, which is very dangerous for us !!! Incomprehensible state policy! Who are we feeding against ourselves?!
  39. Svetovid Vatnikov
    Svetovid Vatnikov 9 March 2022 15: 25
    0
    The Nazi States of America (NSA): they were preparing bacteriological warfare against our country, and most likely they have already used the results of research against us; through Zelesky's nit-ass, they indicated their readiness to start a nuclear war with us, for this they created a Nazi regime in our kindred Ukraine equipped, trained and sent Bandera mutants to kill our and their citizens; geyeropa turned into a single fascist enclave that is ready to rush at us in hysterics. I'm talking about sanctions.
    It turns out - there is NSHA our enemy. All as one experts say that the cancellation of uranium supplies to them will be critical for amers, but we are not canceling anything, we are waiting for them to fuck themselves, and if they don’t. Questions:
    1. Why do not we close the supply of an important resource for the enemy. It's like 1942 to drive Soviet trains from Siberia with bread, metal, solarium to the Nazis.
    2. Where are the daily, targeted strikes against the objects of the Bandera military-Gestapo and propaganda infrastructure of Lviv, Ternopil, Lutsk, Ivano-Frankivsk and other Zapadensky territories of this abomination. Even a monument to scoundrels is reason enough to strike. Strikes to carry out, with prior notification of the population. We do not hit civilians. But the mass daily evacuations of those who believe that Bandera is their father, and Hitler is their mother, then returning them home, which may no longer exist. With the fear of those who think that their deceitful authorities did not finish everything, what the Russian command reported at the place and time, and that they could become a victim of an American provocation so that the Anglo-Saxon cesspool-journalists would shoot a good picture with the victims of Russian aggression.
    If we slept for 8 years in terms of informational impact on the enemy, we need to influence those who hear, and not offendedly persuade them to change their minds and cry about double standards and what kind of enemies are bad. And most importantly, where is the promised effective military-technical, and therefore psychological-suppressive effect, at least in dill? Or do we want to leave ukro-Zapadensky territory for the next revival of Bandera-Nazi scum?
  40. 7 poplar
    7 poplar 9 March 2022 15: 27
    0
    well, you don’t need it - supply them with Uranium!
  41. This is the main
    This is the main 9 March 2022 18: 42
    0
    So we need to add to the list from our side
  42. Mylenef
    Mylenef 9 March 2022 20: 00
    0
    But what about this news from a year ago?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdkiyk3If2s
  43. The comment was deleted.
  44. av58
    av58 10 March 2022 17: 41
    0
    It is necessary to correct the situation and include uranium in the list of goods prohibited for export, primarily to the United States