Military Review

What gives Russia participation in multinational maneuvers

34
What gives Russia participation in multinational maneuversIn the post-Cold War period, a variety of joint military exercises have become a fashion. They often involve countries that are poorly matched politically and geographically. Humanitarian exercises have become very widely practiced, during which the struggle of military groups against the consequences of natural and man-made disasters is practiced (to what extent the military should deal with this is a very debatable issue). Then added countless anti-terrorism teachings. However, this concept very quickly turned into a frank profanation, as scenarios began to fit into it, which obviously have nothing to do with the fight against terrorism.

RITUALS AND TEA CEREMONIES

A striking example of frankly ritual and senseless exercises can be considered "Blaxifor" - annual naval exercises with the participation of the Navy of all six Black Sea countries. Initially, it was not very clear what was being worked out on them. This event turned into a frank farce after the two Black Sea countries (Russia and Georgia) fought among themselves, as a result of which the Georgian fleet was physically destroyed and because of this it was legally abolished. Nevertheless, the teachings or, as they say in the American manner, the Blackseafor activations continue, and are still considered six-sided.

And yet, in many joint exercises, one can find a military-political sense and reveal some interesting trends. In particular, for Russia and its Armed Forces.

Let us set aside joint exercises of the units of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation with the Armed Forces of the countries of the CSTO. If this organization already exists, working out the combat missions by the armies of the member countries is not just natural, but mandatory. More interesting exercises with foreign countries.

In April, the Pacific Fleet of Russia and the Northern Fleet of the PLA Navy conducted the Sea Interaction-2012 exercise, which turned out to be quite large-scale. They worked off repelled strikes of air attack weapons, replenishing stocks in the sea, speeding up the area of ​​operations of submarine forces of a conditional enemy, practical use of anti-submarine rocket bombs, and strikes against naval targets. There were also worked out the issues of the release of the vessel seized by pirates, joint search and rescue operations, assistance to an emergency ship, convoy of ships. The language of interaction in the exercises was Russian.

The Russian naval grouping during the exercises included the Varyag missile cruiser of the 1164 project, three BODs of the 1155 project and three auxiliary vessels.

The Chinese ship group included two Project 039 and 636 submarines, four destroyers, one each of Project 052 and 051C and two of Project 956, five frigates, two of which were Project 053H3 and three were 054A, missile boats and auxiliary vessels . J-8 combat aircraft and naval AWACS aircraft were also used. aviation Navy PLA.

For comparison, it can be said that 2005 Russian and 10 Chinese warships took part in the Russian-Chinese naval exercises in 60. Thus, the scale of the current exercises was almost five times less than seven years ago. In addition, they were very noticeable propaganda side, which in this case is not only and not so much in the presence of the "peaceful" component (the fight against pirates and search and rescue operations), but in the wide coverage of the exercises in the media and conducting several purely spectacular events. Those were the celebrations in the main base of the Chinese Federation of Qingdao on the 63 anniversary of the PLA Navy with a big concert and a joint naval parade. These events took almost as much time as the exercise itself.

BETWEEN WASHINGTON AND PEKIN

On the whole, there was a strong impression that China and Russia not only and not so much worked out the interaction between themselves, as they blackmailed Washington and Tokyo with the possibility of such interaction. Actually, this is exactly the whole “strategic partnership” of Moscow and Beijing in all its aspects. This conclusion is confirmed by the fact that the units of the Russian Armed Forces this year participated or will participate in joint exercises with units of the armies of other countries.

For example, at the end of August, the Russian Air Force and the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) conducted international exercises to work out joint actions when terrorists seized the Vigilant Eagle-2012 aircraft. Similar exercises are held annually since 2010. The units of the armed forces of Russia, the USA and Canada were involved in the exercises. The headquarters of the exercises were located in Khabarovsk, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Colorado Springs and Anchorage.

However, other joint Russian-American antiterrorist exercises were much more interesting, which, unlike the Watchful Eagle, was held for the first time. They were held at the end of May in Colorado, at the Fort Carson military base. The 4-I mechanized division is stationed on it, as well as a number of other parts of the US Army. Among them is the 10 group of the Special Operations Forces, which participated in the exercises together with the intelligence units of the Russian Airborne Forces. The teachings were not formal, but real, as can be seen from how serious the guys participated in them. To use them for the sake of profanation is too expensive and, most importantly, meaningless from any point of view. The participants of the exercises spoke very highly of each other. It is supposed to make the exercises annual and conduct them in turn in the territory of the USA and the Russian Federation

It goes without saying that the exercises were officially considered anti-terrorist. Indeed, of all the arms of service, special forces and troops are the best suited for this task. At the same time, however, it is well known that they are capable of very effectively solving the most varied tasks in the classic war “army against army”.

Finally, in July, a detachment of Pacific ships fleet The Russian Federation as part of the Admiral Panteleev BPC and two auxiliary vessels, a tanker and a tugboat, took part in the RIMPAK-2012 naval exercises in the Hawaii area. These are the world's largest naval exercises organized by the US Pacific Fleet once every two years (first held in 1971) with the participation of the Navy of many allied countries. Scenarios of the war against the USSR were worked out earlier at these exercises, and recently - against China. For the first time, ships of the Russian Navy took part in these exercises. This is extremely symptomatic, given that the Navy of the PRC has never been invited to these exercises. In fact, by participating in RIMPAK-2012, Russia “balanced” the April Russian-Chinese exercises “Maritime Interaction-2012”. Although the scale of Russian participation in RIMPAK-2012 was smaller than in “Sea interaction”, in this case the fact itself and the precedent for participation are very important.

BUDDING FOR THREE SEAS

However, not only the Chinese and Americans have become our partners in joint exercises. In August, the joint Indra-2012 Russian-Indian exercises took place at the Burduny training ground in Buryatia. According to the established international tradition, they were proclaimed antiterrorist, but for some reason, a traditional all-arms battle with extensive use of armored vehicles and attack aircraft was practiced on them. Moreover, the Indian soldiers at the time of the exercise were transferred to the T-72 and BMP-2 of the Eastern Military District of the Russian Federation. A joint landing of a helicopter assault was also worked out.

At the end of September, the next Russian-Mongolian exercise Selenga-2012 will be held at the same Burduny range. Of course, they are also told to be considered antiterrorist, although it is not clear where terrorism will come from in Mongolia (or Buryatia) (so far it has not been observed there, there are not the slightest prerequisites for its appearance). It is even more surprising that in this area, not suffering from the invasion of terrorists, Hindus were brought in to work on their fight against them. It should be noted that the "Burduny" are located near the border with China. By the way, the Indra-2010 Russian-Indian exercises took place two years ago on the territory of India also near the border of this country with China. And for Mongolia there are no potential opponents at all, except China. Therefore, the geopolitical orientation of the Buryat teachings is quite clear.

Approximately three or four years ago, the Kremlin apparently noticed that the "strategic partnership" with Beijing was going somewhere wrong. The fact that it is beneficial only to China in purely economic terms is half the trouble. But it is already impossible not to notice the rapid growth of the military power of the PRC and the very strange nature of the PLA exercises, very similar to the testing of aggression against Russia (the NVO wrote about this many times). In this regard, it seems, there was a desire to somehow balance such a wonderful "partner." And even, it is not excluded, the understanding came that it is impossible to do this without allies. As such, of course, India is best suited. Mongolia is also very useful, having, of course, almost zero military potential, but an extremely important strategic position. Well, can not do without the United States.

Imagine how Americans will be with weapons in hands to protect us from China, to put it mildly, is difficult. But it is absolutely necessary for us to demonstrate to Peking ourselves that for Russia the world has never come together with a wedge, we decide ourselves who and how we should be friends with. Our "partner" clearly needs sobering up. And since the United States almost openly proclaimed its containment of China as its most important geopolitical goal, it is extremely important for Russia to become who China was during the years of the Cold War - “the monkey watching the tigers fight.” And to pursue an absolutely balanced policy, with no one too much quarreling and not drawing closer. By the way, in this case Beijing and Washington will appreciate us much more (to a certain extent, it is noticeable already today).

In this regard, it would be very desirable to extinguish the anti-American paranoia, which once again manifested itself in relation to the above-mentioned joint exercises with the US Armed Forces. The arguments of the fighters against them are as absurd and irrational as in the case of the “NATO base in Ulyanovsk”, therefore it is almost impossible to discuss with them. Actually, hysteria should be stopped even without reference to China and to the United States itself. Just because there is an obvious collective psychosis, frankly dangerous for the nation. When the basis of the worldview of a significant part of the country's population is paranoid delusion, it does not matter what the topic of this nonsense is. You just need to correct the situation, and not aggravate it.

FACE OF POLICIES ON THE BACKGROUND OF PUSHERS

A separate practical question is what do joint exercises give us not in a political but in a purely military sense? For example, can the Mongols teach us anything? How do we theoretically and practically enrich the "Marine Interaction" or the "Vigilant Eagle"?

In fact, no information is useless, especially when it comes to exercises with the Americans and the Chinese. We, at least, study them, as, indeed, they - us. Who will benefit more from this and why it depends on us.

It is more or less obvious that in the “Sea Cooperation” the ritual-political component was the main one, militarily they did not give anything, if only because before the Russian Pacific Fleet and the PLA Navy conducted much more large-scale exercises with more realistic scenarios. There are big doubts that the scenario developed during the Watchful Eagle exercise (airport control is too tight today) is being realized, although it might be useful to work out the procedures for interaction between the air forces of three countries just in case. But the teachings in Colorado, as already mentioned, must be taken very seriously. American special forces and Russian paratroopers carefully studied each other. The question is in what aspect of the results of this study they will be useful in the future.

As for the Hindus and the Mongols, it is possible that we will have to really interact with them in battle against the common enemy. From this point of view, joint exercises with them are obviously useful. And even the Mongolian army in no case should not be neglected. Despite its small number and outdated weapons, it, at least, knows how to operate in mountainous and steppe areas. In addition, some Mongolian military personnel have experience serving in Iraq, and in the most acute period of the war in that country.

As for India, as mentioned above, this is our most important potential ally. Therefore, we should carry out joint exercises with the Armed Forces of this country much more often and on a much larger scale than now.
Author:
Originator:
http://nvo.ng.ru
34 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. kush62
    kush62 26 September 2012 07: 23
    +1
    I will not relate to the attitude of Russians to the United States, but I will say that you need to know the probable opponent comprehensively. (Both on water and on land) Well, Mongolia, as a bridgehead, is 100% suitable.
    1. bairat
      bairat 26 September 2012 07: 46
      +1
      But what kind of bridgeheads should we have if the Chinese trample Siberia we lose within a couple of days. I just can’t imagine how it will be possible to stop the full-blooded Chinese divisions.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 26 September 2012 07: 52
        +1
        Quote: bairat
        if the Chinese trample Siberia we lose within a couple of days.

        Why would they trample to Siberia?
        1. INTER
          INTER 26 September 2012 08: 46
          +2
          Quote: bairat
          if the Chinese trample Siberia we lose within a couple of days.

          Do not trample, they do not need it. They are closer and under the power of Mongolia than Russia. In addition, we are growing stronger every day, and there is a tool.
          negative
        2. bairat
          bairat 26 September 2012 10: 11
          +1
          those. Do you want to say this land is useless to anyone?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 26 September 2012 10: 20
            +3
            Quote: bairat
            those. Do you want to say this land is useless to anyone?

            If it weren’t needed then the Russians in Siberia weren’t. We don’t need an alien and we won’t give it back.
            1. bairat
              bairat 26 September 2012 10: 39
              0
              You cannot get rid of such an adversary with just slogans.
              1. INTER
                INTER 26 September 2012 10: 53
                0
                Quote: bairat
                those. Do you want to say this land is useless to anyone?

                We need it, it is ours, the rest do not interest us!
        3. Kaa
          Kaa 26 September 2012 10: 12
          +4
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Why would they trample to Siberia?

          Ginseng to collect and restore the tiger population ... laughing
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 26 September 2012 10: 19
            +2
            Quote: Kaa
            Ginseng to collect and restore the tiger population ..

            Ginseng grows in the Far East and then not everywhere, and tigers will not survive from mustache to bones. The Chinese use the tiger in medetsine, cut out the last. hi
            1. Kaa
              Kaa 26 September 2012 10: 33
              +2
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              The Chinese use the tiger in medecine, cut out the last

              Here I am about it. They and ginseng are desirable not planted, but wild ... Radish doctors ... angry
              1. INTER
                INTER 26 September 2012 10: 55
                +1
                Quote: Kaa
                Here I am about it. They and ginseng are desirable not planted, but wild ... Radish doctors ...

                So protect our tigers laughing and ginseng. We are not bad without ginseng, there are no problems despite the fact that we do not collect it. But the Chinese ????? what
                1. Odessa
                  Odessa 26 September 2012 20: 00
                  +1
                  INTER,
                  So protect our tigers and ginseng

                  And what’s funny, Romanov told how he went for the ginseng, and even saw a tiger, even wished that he was not a tamer or tamer of tigers laughing
                  1. Karish
                    Karish 26 September 2012 20: 06
                    0
                    Quote: Odessa
                    even saw a tiger, d

                    Probably Putin laughing

                    Quote: Odessa
                    he even regretted that he was not a trainer

                    Alexander do not regret, we have one trainer (more precisely two, but the second ayped trains) laughing
      2. Karish
        Karish 26 September 2012 07: 56
        +1
        Quote: bairat
        I just can’t imagine how it will be possible to stop the full-blooded Chinese divisions.

        Tactical nuclear weapons, do not forget that the aggression of China (countries with nuclear weapons) will automatically turn the war into a nuclear one, or do you have doubts that Russia will use it?
      3. mongoose
        mongoose 26 September 2012 08: 38
        0
        yah? do you know this combination of letters? Strategic Rocket Forces?
      4. tronin.maxim
        tronin.maxim 26 September 2012 09: 21
        +1
        Quote: bairat
        I just can’t imagine how it will be possible to stop full-blooded Chinese divisions

        2-3 cruise missiles with cluster filling and deal with the end! Well, or multiple launch rocket systems!
        1. bairat
          bairat 26 September 2012 10: 18
          +3
          They will have more of these volley fire systems, the most important thing is that the army is ready, they’ve been advancing for 150 km per day at the division’s exercises for weeks, and we probably didn’t have such large-scale exercises under the USSR.
      5. Retx
        Retx 26 September 2012 11: 34
        +1
        That’s how it’s funny for me to read about the millions of Chinese armies advancing in Siberia laughing Siberia is not a Russian plain, here such maneuvers (attack on 150 km) may end in disaster for the Chinese
        1. bairat
          bairat 26 September 2012 11: 49
          +2
          here it’s not even in kilometers but in the degree of preparation.
  2. bask
    bask 26 September 2012 07: 38
    0
    I think it’s a “waste” of budgetary funds. In the place of this, a ship or several T90 MSs were acquired. And the marines are completely without new equipment. Single BMP3F images have. These are urgent problems, and not, artworks, internationally .
    1. mongoose
      mongoose 26 September 2012 08: 38
      +3
      equipment without a trained crew - a piece of metal
  3. Sasha 19871987
    Sasha 19871987 26 September 2012 07: 39
    0
    all these teachings are needed - and show yourself and look at the "partners"
  4. bairat
    bairat 26 September 2012 07: 40
    +1
    In this regard, it would be very desirable to extinguish anti-American paranoia,
    this forum is hardly possible.
    1. mongoose
      mongoose 26 September 2012 08: 39
      0
      Yeah and give us Siberia?
    2. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 26 September 2012 10: 22
      +1
      Quote: bairat
      In this regard, it would be very desirable to extinguish anti-American paranoia,

      You can confess amers love and bow to their feet. This is your respected paranoia, since you don’t understand elementary things.
      1. bairat
        bairat 26 September 2012 10: 37
        0
        What is it that throws you to the extreme, youthful maximalism? There is a wide range of possible relationships between "bow down" and antiparanoia.
        1. INTER
          INTER 26 September 2012 10: 57
          0
          Quote: bairat
          In this regard, it would be very desirable to extinguish anti-American paranoia,
          this forum is hardly possible.

          And not only go out and ask a dozen people.
  5. Dimani
    Dimani 26 September 2012 08: 03
    +4
    if the Chinese trample Siberia we lose within a couple of days


    hmm .. it looks like you were not in Siberia
    1. bairat
      bairat 26 September 2012 10: 21
      +1
      He was once in Irkutsk, 4 days by train, traveling one way. The Trans-Siberian Railway is very vulnerable, and this can be said the only artery connecting the west of the country with the east.
      1. INTER
        INTER 26 September 2012 11: 05
        +3
        I agree! And what will they do after that, how will they move?
        1. bairat
          bairat 26 September 2012 11: 53
          0
          take up defense on some sort of large river. with Chinese potential there will be no shortage of sapper units; they will build roads, oddly enough. but what will we do after that, forward to the machine guns?
          1. kush62
            kush62 26 September 2012 12: 57
            0
            And are we going to watch their construction online on the Internet? Internal conflict is one thing and international is another. A completely different weapon is used however.
          2. Feanor
            Feanor 26 September 2012 15: 43
            0
            Oh, come on, they will capture Siberia. Well, they will come "to take up defensive positions on some river." Question: How will they keep this defense in winter? laughing
      2. Dimani
        Dimani 26 September 2012 18: 10
        0
        take defense on some sort of large river


        logical, but the occupation of defense is the transfer of initiative to the adversary. It will even be beneficial for us.
  6. sergey05
    sergey05 26 September 2012 09: 56
    0
    God forbid, war with China. they are the largest army can expose more than the entire population of Russia. And their weapons, if not better, are not inferior to ours. They themselves were armed.
    1. INTER
      INTER 27 September 2012 13: 33
      0
      Quote: sergey05
      And their weapons, if not better, are not inferior to ours. They themselves were armed.

      So we have enough biological) wassat
  7. Retx
    Retx 26 September 2012 11: 39
    0
    And the teachings are always good and useful, especially in Central Asia, which will soon boil. sad
  8. bask
    bask 26 September 2012 13: 22
    0
    Mongoose and a trained crew on a piece of metal are also not suitable. Modern equipment and trained crews are also needed.
  9. taseka
    taseka 26 September 2012 15: 15
    0
    "Various joint military exercises have become a fashion. They often involve countries that are poorly combined politically and geographically." - Fifigignya all this! Everyone thinks about his own benefit, like that Neanderthal man, about how more females to stibri from a neighboring tribe, so that they give birth to more boys - warriors !!! Just instincts have become a bit more civilized! What! Joint parades and exercises with the 3 Reich and now with NATO are absolute for us?
    "Kissing" - but we know that we will "Bite"
  10. sined0707
    sined0707 26 September 2012 18: 13
    -1
    China is, of course, an enemy who needs an eye and an eye, but so far, thank God it is not for us, there is only one hope that when he wants to go to Russia, Russia will be ready by then, there is still time. But breaking into Siberia is suicide, they will never do it, they will find another way.