Military Review

The British Prime Minister said about the risks of Russia to unleash the "biggest war in Europe since 1945"

128

The "Russian invasion" of Ukraine scheduled by the West for February 20 did not happen, the Russian army once again ignored the "forecasts" of Western politicians. However, in Britain, new deadlines have already been set.


British Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced Russia's "plans" to "surround Kiev", the offensive will begin not only from the territory of Donbass, but also from Belarus. At the same time, he refers to British intelligence data and statements by Joe Biden, who, in turn, refers to US intelligence data. At the same time, neither the British prime minister nor the American president cites any evidence, but they declare some "signs" of the preparation of a "Russian invasion".

According to Johnson, Moscow has already begun "the implementation of the plan to invade Ukraine." In London, they fear that the conflict launched by Russia in Ukraine could lead to the largest war in Europe since 1945. That is exactly what Johnson made.

I'm afraid that's what the evidence points to, you can't embellish it. The fact is that by all indications, the plan has already begun in some sense (...) can really become the biggest war in Europe since 1945 only in terms of scale

- he said.

Echoes Johnson and British Foreign Minister Liz Truss. "Connoisseur" of Russian geography and world stories set new dates for the Russian "invasion", saying that it would take place "next week". Truss did not give a more detailed "forecast", apparently British intelligence works worse than American intelligence, everything is clear for that one - dates, times and the number of troops are appointed in advance, though it is not confirmed by anything and turns out to be another "dummy".

According to the head of the British Foreign Office, Russia does not accept the West's proposals to sit down at the negotiating table.
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/10DowningStreet
128 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vadim Krymov
    Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 00
    -14
    Part of the Russian "native oligarchy" is quite interested in the war of the West against Russia and longs for Russia's defeat in this war. Why? Because those planning to "win" promised to put the Russian oligarchs "in the Kremlin" as overseers of Russian citizens, driven to the plantations to labor on European values.
    1. Aerodrome
      Aerodrome 20 February 2022 10: 03
      +1
      The British Prime Minister said about the risks of Russia to unleash the "biggest war in Europe since 1945"
      mentally retarded thoughts, mentally retarded owner, mentally retarded head. Further quote from Grandfather: S.V. Lavrov.
      1. nikon7717
        nikon7717 20 February 2022 10: 06
        +8
        Here I found a good quote in response to all this noise
        .A note on the margins of the current info wars. Krylov once gave a good explanation that an important detail of psychological preparation for any war is the dehumanization of the enemy. To show that a potential adversary is something so immoral, so insane and at the same time devilishly cynical that every word he says is a lie, his every action is dictated by his vices, and he wants only evil, death and blood. And therefore it is impossible to speak with him in the language of reason, and it is also impossible to consider him an interlocutor; that strength is the only thing that can stop him. I agree with this, and therefore I fix the escalation precisely on these indirect signs - when the parties try to describe each other's every action as a camouflage of aggression, as a conscious lie to divert attention, and the opponent himself as a deliberate fiend of evil.

        In general, I have never been a pacifist and not a supporter of the principle "if only there was no war." But the years of analytical work with propaganda machines have firmly hammered into me the principle of “don’t let yourself be convinced by your own propaganda” - by the way, this also applies to someone else’s, but it’s easier with it: more filters at the input.

        And now I don’t see that the so-called. the "collective West" so certainly wants war and is leading the way towards it. By and large, they were just fine with the status quo — with Russia doubly guilty, which can be endlessly pressed for Crimea and Donbass, with the “people’s republics” dragging out a miserable, hopeless and hopeless state, with Ukraine, where, with all the mess, the main "clamps" of Russophobic discourse and gradually, but steadily, the factory for reforging Russian people into Svidomo dill patriots is working.

        Moreover, I also do not see that Putin and his entourage are so sure that they want war and are working towards it. They see quite clearly to what extent the country is not ready to raise the stakes in the confrontation with the West, and how few, by and large, there are trump cards in their hands. There is no clear plan even for what to do with the "people's republics" in their current form, let alone wider annexation. For them, the status quo was, of course, “obscene,” according to Surkov’s well-known expression, but still the world. And no matter how much the propagandists outside draw him a Hitler mustache, don’t treat me, please: I don’t know from the media picture, but first-hand that our leadership is more like elderly boring hedonists than vigorous revanchists-aggressors. All the decisions of the spring of 2014 are not the result of pre-prepared plans - they simply did not exist - but a desperate improvisation, undertaken largely out of a sense of resentment for another “scam” with a multilateral agreement, and in general, the inability to plan and calculate the consequences is one of the many weaknesses of our systems.

        Ukraine especially does not want any war. All these years, it seemed to the Kiev leaders that sooner or later the Donbass itself would fall into their hands, like an overripe fruit, and this would be the long-awaited “non-military victory” over the “aggressor”. They had many reasons to think so. They felt quite confident in the regime of the “obscene” Minsk agreements, where everything was written down, except for the deadlines. And this gave a reason to prolong the situation indefinitely, while it slowly but surely leaned in their favor. They didn't need to push.

        Why, despite the fact that the escalation objectively had no obvious interests, did it still happen? In my opinion, precisely because the “dehumanizing” style has long since become the language for describing the situation precisely in the status quo. From all sides. From the Kremlin's point of view, Ukraine is not a counterparty; it is not subjective, it is controlled from the outside and there is no one to talk to. From Kiev's point of view, the "people's republics" are not a counterparty; they are Russian proxies, separatists and terrorists and there is no one to talk to. Moreover, from the point of view of the “collective West”, Russia, in general, is also not a counterparty: you can portray “readiness for negotiations” as much as you like, but by and large there is also no one to talk to and nothing about, too different “pictures of the world” .
        1. Tatyana
          Tatyana 20 February 2022 10: 07
          +11
          The British Prime Minister said about the risks of Russia to unleash the "biggest war in Europe since 1945"

          You might think that the Anglo-Saxons themselves - Great Britain and the USA - did not unleash the Second World War even before 1938, when WWII essentially began,
          They unleashed it and how, promoting Hitler to power in Germany with the aim of war with the USSR / Russia since 1923!
          1. tihonmarine
            tihonmarine 20 February 2022 10: 19
            +1
            Quote: Tatiana
            You might think that the Anglo-Saxons themselves - Great Britain and the USA - even before 1938, when WWII essentially began, they themselves did not unleash the Second World War!

            Tatyana, if only WWII, and if you look back into history and the map of the world, then all the wars were provoked by Britain and all the colossal territories on the globe were conquered by Britain. Although - "Rule Britain, rule the seas" does not sound loud and proud, but a small (like its islands) dirty trick will never become an angel that brings peace, all over the world.
            1. SKVichyakow
              SKVichyakow 20 February 2022 10: 49
              +1
              Somehow this island lingered on the map for a long time.
          2. keeper03
            keeper03 20 February 2022 11: 13
            -7
            It's amazing why we are losing the information war! request
            Putin would have to give counterarguments, who and how brewed the Second World War, and then financed and supported it, but he prefers to do his deeds quietly! request
            1. 210ox
              210ox 20 February 2022 11: 17
              +4
              The whole point is that our leader relies on assistants. The same Peskov. Putin should have made more frequent appeals to people in person, and not through someone else. But this is my opinion.
              1. keeper03
                keeper03 20 February 2022 11: 18
                +7
                How should I put it ... he has shitty assistants! No.
                1. 210ox
                  210ox 20 February 2022 11: 21
                  +5
                  I noticed it too. Even EBN, not to mention it with a kind word, even then went out to speak to people more often. Although he couldn't say anything.
              2. DrRey
                DrRey 20 February 2022 11: 49
                +3
                The Russian-speaking world numbers well if 300 million people, and the English-speaking world has several billion people. You can speak and explain as much as you like, but if you are not understood in the base of your values ​​and elements of the picture of the world, then there is no sense
                1. 210ox
                  210ox 20 February 2022 11: 54
                  +2
                  I meant the speech before our citizens. Old Biden made an appeal to us, but our Head of State did not. Moreover, at a very crucial moment, this is not clear to our people, that is the question.
                2. Reklastik
                  Reklastik 21 February 2022 18: 54
                  0
                  Taking into account the fact that the concept of "a few" can be between values ​​​​from 7 to 15, and the entire population of the Earth is approximately 7,9 billion, and 1,3 billion of them are only Chinese in China, 1,4 billion - Indians - this bold statement) USA - 330 million, UK - 66 million, Australia - 26 million ... Well, not a few billion, even if you count the English-speaking population of the Philippines, Canada and somewhere else ...
                  1. DrRey
                    DrRey 21 February 2022 21: 35
                    0
                    Taking into account the fact that the Chinese and Indians are included in the orbit of the English-speaking world much more than the Russian - this is one time, and the British Commonwealth has several dozen states - this is two, so my thesis about several billion is not at all wrong.
                    1. Reklastik
                      Reklastik 21 February 2022 22: 57
                      0
                      Taking into account the fact that the Chinese and Indians are included in the orbit of the English-speaking world much more than the Russian
                      - well, then the Indians and the Chinese can say with equal justification that the English-speaking world is included in the orbit of Asia and add to themselves ... well, about 1,8 billion of the Commonwealth's population. To their own, only officially almost 2,7 billion. I think that the world understands the basic values ​​of Russia - both Europeans and Americans, although they pretend that they do not understand us. And our main problems are with them, and not with the Commonwealth countries as a whole. I don't think Rwanda, as a member of the Commonwealth, cares about us. laughing . Why China is far from us in terms of mentality, but its press, after rolling on China in 2018, began to show an amazing understanding of our values ​​​​and positions, they began to write about it directly. And China... It's big. More of the English speaking world. His understanding is no less important for us. And in the 21st century, given its role and capabilities, most likely more.
          3. Kerensky
            Kerensky 20 February 2022 11: 16
            0
            They unleashed it and how, promoting Hitler to power in Germany with the aim of war with the USSR / Russia since 1923!

            Ouch! Beer paid "on the putsch"? In 1923, Hitler was the Fuhrer of a small party. There was a whole basket of them.
            And he could not attack "treacherously" until 1939 - there was no common border with the USSR.
            This is how far-sighted you have to be to start an operation (not counting the stage of variable study) in 1923, in order to start it in 1941?!
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 20 February 2022 12: 13
              +2
              Quote: Kerensky
              This is how far-sighted you have to be to start an operation (not counting the stage of variable study) in 1923, in order to start it in 1941?!

              If you, Kerensky, want to say, that in the colonial globalist STRATEGY of the Anglo-Saxons of Great Britain (and its derivative - the USA) against the Republic of Ingushetia / USSR / Russia throughout history over the past 300-400 years there have been some significant temporary interruptions and significant changes and relaxations of a sabotage and subversive nature, as against the country and the nation state, then you are mistaken!

              The Anglo-Saxons deliberately began to look for someone like Hitler immediately after WWI, since Russia, as a country, albeit in a politically changed, i.e. in the Soviet form continued to exist on the political map of the world.
              And it was precisely in the person of Hitler that they found such a national-native leader that they really needed, bringing this Hitler and his party practically "by the hand" to the supreme power in Germany for the destruction, namely Russia, as such, in any of its kind of like a country and Russian civilization!

              И сейчас Лондон и Вашингтон делают всё то же самое! Их цель - это геополитическое исчезновение России с политической карты мира как страны и русской национально государство образующей цивилизации.
              1. Kerensky
                Kerensky 20 February 2022 13: 43
                +1
                If you, Kerensky, want to say (...) then you are mistaken!

                Alas me!
                I hope for your indulgence. Do not take it for work - in 1923 there was like a Civil War? And the Anglo-Saxons were already looking for a retired corporal in a state bound by the Treaty of Versailles (and even without common borders with Russia) in order to make a trump Fuhrer out of him?
                What an infection!
                PS The Red Army book of Adolf Schicklgruber has been preserved, received in 1918.
                1. Victor Leningradets
                  Victor Leningradets 20 February 2022 14: 19
                  +5
                  The civil war ended in the European part in 1920. In the Far East - in 1922. The British began to look for a strike force against the Bolsheviks in the autumn / winter of 1919, when the military experts of the RSFSR buried the plan of a united campaign of the White Guards and interventionists under the leadership of the Entente. It turned out, in particular, that the veterans of the First World War recruited into the expeditionary corps are only suitable for protecting property and performing punitive operations against the unarmed and unorganized population. And free time is spent in drunkenness, robbery and violence.
                  The idea to use a replica of the Kaiser's troops against the RSFSR was actively worked out in 1920 during the Soviet-Polish war. This idea was finally buried by the Rappal peace treaty on April 16, 1922. Then, taking into account the successes of Mussolini in Italy, a bet was made on the militarized revanchist groups in the Weimar Republic, giving them a fascist ideology.
                  1. Kerensky
                    Kerensky 20 February 2022 14: 27
                    0
                    The civil war ended in the European part in 1920 g. In the Far East - in 1922 city The British began to look for a strike force against the Bolsheviks since autumn 1919,

                    Victor. But I will not argue.
                    That is, the adversaries began to look for the Fuhrer (leader) before the end of the "field commanders" in the field? They rejected the entire personnel reserve of the white emigration (and there are authoritative people with extensive connections) for the sake of a retired corporal ?!
                    From the ash tree collapsed in Sherwood Forest?!
                    1. Victor Leningradets
                      Victor Leningradets 20 February 2022 15: 47
                      +2
                      They rejected them back in 1918. They managed to fail everything when the Red Army was not even in short pants. Therefore, in 1919 they were assigned the role of field commanders of the native troops under the leadership of the post-Entente. In addition, intervention assistance and the supply of weapons (however, quite frail) were provided. But that didn't help much either. The iron discipline of the Bolsheviks and the growing might of the Red Army did their job. And it immediately became clear that as soon as Russia operates on the imperial field - success, as on the field of the cosmopolitan Comintern - so failure. And the Polish company generally put an end to dreams of a world revolution.
                      By the way, my grandfather, with weapons in his hands (more precisely, with an airplane), fought in the Civil War only against the White Poles. He was not allowed to fight against "his own" as a tsarist officer.
                      Seeing that Russia (Soviet only until the Kronstadt rebellion of 1921) was reborn from the end of 1919, the Entente (which was ruled by Great Britain) began to look for a strike force against the RSFSR. Using the Poles (and almost losing everything), they began to glance at Germany with might and main. But anti-militarist sentiments were extremely strong there. So I had to use revanchist small groups, often openly gangster ones. And in order to reverse the trend of rapprochement between Germany and the USSR, in 1923, the completely fake Hamburg Uprising (October 22) was organized by the cosmopolitans of the revolution (October 8) and, as if in response, a "patriotic" beer putsch (November 9 - XNUMX). Whose ears stick out behind these events is not particularly necessary to guess.
              2. Reptiloid
                Reptiloid 20 February 2022 15: 48
                +1
                That is the way it is!
                ...... London and Washington ....... Their goal is --- ....... the disappearance of Russia .....

                Moreover, London has been fighting against different countries for a long time, before their destruction ALREADY LONG! At the same time, it forms coalitions, military alliances with other countries, involving many for the sake of HIS BENEFITS, pushing neighboring peoples against each other! In this they were very successful.
                If the prehistory of WW1, WW2, the Crimean War is well known, then the British tried to push many other nations together. Most of all, of course, fought with those who are nearby --- Scots, Irish and Welsh. England has always been able to win strong allies over to its side.
                For example, Afghanistan has always been in the zone of its interests. Also the Balkans, the islands of Crete and Cyprus. If you look at the XVIII --- XIX centuries, you can see how the Angles successively captured India, defeating one principality after another. It is known that the peoples in this territory are numerous and have always waged wars with each other ...
                The war between Mexico and the Mayan people in the XNUMXth century is rarely remembered. The goal was to DIVIDE Mexico!
                A similar technique was used during the Opium Wars. Also in Africa, Madagascar, Burma, Sunda, Korea, Australia, New Zealand... The list is huge.
                How did the colonization of North America take place? How many Indians died!
        2. 1976AG
          1976AG 20 February 2022 10: 15
          +6
          Well, yes, the West does not want war, but for some reason it is doing everything to make it happen. And Ukraine does not want war. They just want to destroy the Crimean bridge, hit Moscow with rockets and ride a tank across Red Square. But this is not a manifestation of aggression, right?
        3. alex neym_2
          alex neym_2 20 February 2022 10: 34
          0
          And Johnson makes such a statement against the background of the Armed Forces of Ukraine reconnaissance in battle, did he go crazy, or something, from a healthy head to a sick one?
        4. krops777
          krops777 20 February 2022 11: 53
          +2
          Russia, in general, is also not a counterparty: you can portray “readiness for negotiations” as much as you like, but by and large there is no one to talk to and nothing to talk about, too different “pictures of the world”.

          Why, then, as mongrel one by one to Moscow to Putin in line? Yes, their aristocracy still plays white gentlemen in pith helmets, but they want it to be warm and without war on their territory, and here Russia has declared its rights and the main thing is now there is something to hit on the helmet. I think that if the LDNR, Russia takes it away, then they will have to swallow it, it hurts with squeals, but it will have to, and oh, how you don’t want to, so they go sniff out what and how.
          1. Xnumx vis
            Xnumx vis 20 February 2022 13: 13
            +1
            Quote: krops777
            I think that if LDNR, Russia will take

            By this, Russia will save the inhabitants of Donbass. Yes, it's worth it. But it will not solve the problem with Ukraine. Ahresor will howl there! And these spins and the Angles will strengthen their presence in Ukraine. In principle, they will annex the ancient Russian land .. It is impossible not to finish things. Yes, sanctions, yes, Russia has its own hataskrai, I want lace panties .... But in the end, they do not decide the fate of the country. And these "aristocracy" Schmotschilds and Rothschilds will squeal and stall.
          2. Victor Leningradets
            Victor Leningradets 20 February 2022 14: 22
            0
            The pith helmet follows the stud to the head so that it does not fall.
      2. NKT
        NKT 20 February 2022 10: 19
        +3
        could truly be the biggest war in Europe since 1945 in terms of scale alone

        They want to forget what they did to Yugoslavia
        1. Alex Nevs
          Alex Nevs 20 February 2022 10: 52
          0
          You need to put ellipses .. Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia ..... In general, this "track record" is quite extensive.
      3. tralflot1832
        tralflot1832 20 February 2022 10: 25
        -1
        Is the heating battery warm, or is it just for beauty?
        1. sabakina
          sabakina 20 February 2022 10: 49
          0
          Quote: tralflot1832
          Is the heating battery warm, or is it just for beauty?

          Andrey, this is an English fireplace, stylized as "steam" heating. And Zelibaba apparently brought fuel for the fireplace. wink
      4. The comment was deleted.
    2. alone
      alone 20 February 2022 10: 04
      +4
      Quote: Vadim Krymov
      native oligarchy"

      recourse
      Quote: Vadim Krymov
      Russian oligarchs

      And who are these oligarchs? Who made them oligarchs? Me or you, or a simple citizen Ivanov?
      1. Vadim Krymov
        Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 06
        -14
        The oligarchs in Russia were made by the communists, who “surrendered” the USSR in 1991 without a fight.

        During the war with Japan, the Bolsheviks longed for defeat in this war of the Russian Empire. For what? In order to arrange an armed coup and destroy the Empire. Now the role of Bolshevik provocateurs in modern Russian society is played by some of the Russian "native oligarchs". There is nothing new under the sun…
        1. Flooding
          Flooding 20 February 2022 10: 11
          +8
          Quote: Vadim Krymov
          The oligarchs in Russia were made by the communists, who “surrendered” the USSR in 1991 without a fight.

          You are mistaken
          "communists" in quotation marks
          the party had degenerated by that time
          and "surrendered", on the contrary, without any quotes
          1. Vadim Krymov
            Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 14
            -17
            If the party has degenerated, then it was originally organized by geeks ... Moreover, geeks - without quotes ...
            1. 210ox
              210ox 20 February 2022 10: 19
              +5
              You keep your tongue. About geeks. All in a crowd.
              1. Vadim Krymov
                Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 28
                -13
                Watch yours... It was you who "surrendered" the USSR to the "democrats of the pidoss spill"? Rented...
                1. 210ox
                  210ox 20 February 2022 10: 41
                  +4
                  Don't poke. I didn't drink brotherhood with you. And with dirty hands on all members of the party .. There were all sorts, I do not argue. But you also cursed my late mother Pristavkin at Nina Yakovlevna. And she was really but a real communist and a simple teacher .. So let's go ...
                  1. Vadim Krymov
                    Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 44
                    -18
                    Drinking with you is not self-respecting. Somehow get drunk near Lenin's mausoleum in tears over the communist paradise you've screwed up. And don’t drag your mother in - have the courage to answer for yourself ...
                    1. 210ox
                      210ox 20 February 2022 10: 53
                      +6
                      I don't respect you. I see no point in arguing with a rude character.
                      1. Vadim Krymov
                        Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 00
                        -16
                        Then I dare not detain... Free.
                2. sabakina
                  sabakina 20 February 2022 10: 52
                  +4
                  Quote: Vadim Krymov
                  Watch yours... It was you who "surrendered" the USSR to the "democrats of the pidoss spill"? Rented...

                  Titka you cockroach! That's who you are!
                  1. Vadim Krymov
                    Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 01
                    -12
                    Is there anything else you can say "essentially"?
                    1. sabakina
                      sabakina 20 February 2022 11: 02
                      +5
                      Well, if you don't understand the first time, then I'm sorry, I'm not a psychiatrist.
                      1. Vadim Krymov
                        Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 17
                        -9
                        I'm sorry... Everything?
            2. Flooding
              Flooding 20 February 2022 10: 20
              +6
              Quote: Vadim Krymov
              If the party has degenerated, then it was originally organized by geeks.

              there is already a huge semantic flaw in this phrase
              it's hard not to notice
              regardless of the relationship to the USSR

              "if the ancient Roman society degenerated, then it was organized by geeks ..."

              obvious nonsense, dictated not by common sense, but by emotions
              1. Vadim Krymov
                Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 34
                -8
                To betray "communist ideals" for chewing gum and jeans, as millions of communists in the USSR did, is not nonsense. These are facts.

                At least one Bolshevik-Leninist in 1991 from Lenin's room fired back at the attacking chains of the "shitty guard"? No. And that is betrayal. And who are the traitors? Traitors are degenerates.
                1. Flooding
                  Flooding 20 February 2022 10: 44
                  +2
                  Quote: Vadim Krymov
                  To betray "communist ideals" for chewing gum and jeans, as millions of communists in the USSR did, is not nonsense. These are the facts

                  I wrote about it above
                  Quote: Flood
                  the party had degenerated by that time
                  and "surrendered", on the contrary, without any quotes

                  and there are few who want to argue with this
                  too obvious and too vivid in memories

                  don't play win-win
                  it's useless, because you seriously got into a puddle in another comment
                  Quote: Vadim Krymov
                  If the party has degenerated, then it was originally organized by geeks ... Moreover, geeks - without quotes ...
                  1. Vadim Krymov
                    Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 09
                    -7
                    May be...
                2. Victor Leningradets
                  Victor Leningradets 20 February 2022 14: 26
                  +1
                  Pugo Boris Karlovich.
                  And you yourself are a freak. Shut up!
                  1. Vadim Krymov
                    Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 17: 56
                    -3
                    One Pugo "shot back"? And all the other millions of communists - together with you - were afraid of the crap? Yeah cool...
            3. tatra
              tatra 20 February 2022 10: 36
              -1
              It is useless to expect from the enemies of the communists not only the truth, but also logic and common sense.
              If there were supposedly no communists in the CPSU, then there would only be YOU, and for some unknown reason, before your "Liberator" Gorbachev, you did, said, wrote everything the same as the communists and their supporters.
              1. Vadim Krymov
                Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 55
                -10
                Yes, yes... "Storm" the Winter Palace, where there was a hospital, and then rape the women from the shock battalion - that was "heroism". But to "storm" Gorbachev - "the guts" turned out to be ... Iron logic?
                1. tatra
                  tatra 20 February 2022 10: 59
                  -1
                  Ha, why are none of you, the enemies of the communists, able to PROTECT each other, and what you yourself did?
                  What is your ideology and history of your country and people all 30 years after you captured the RSFSR, not FOR yourself, but against others, including, and against each other?
                  You are FOR yourself only when it is beneficial to you in your anti-Soviet, or for the sake of money.
                  1. Vadim Krymov
                    Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 05
                    -7
                    Yes, you already “protected” yourself in 1991 - they fled like cockroaches under a “shit broom”. And then your communist functionaries partially crawled into the current oligarchs ... Whose cow would moo ...
                    1. tatra
                      tatra 20 February 2022 11: 19
                      -1
                      Ha, it is useless to expect from the enemies of the communists that they will finally find the courage to defend themselves. Which of you then are the "defenders" of the Russian Federation you created, and your Yeltsin-Putin government and the System?
                      1. Vadim Krymov
                        Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 51
                        -6
                        The most important enemies of the communists are the "other" communists themselves. Those that did not break through to the feeder. Dialectics...
        2. alone
          alone 20 February 2022 10: 11
          +1
          Quote: Vadim Krymov
          The oligarchs in Russia were made by the communists, who “surrendered” the USSR in 1991 without a fight.

          Until 1999, I knew two oligarchs. Gusinsky and Berezovsky.. And now how many are there?
          Quote: Vadim Krymov
          part of the Russian "native oligarchs".

          Why a part? Do you think if tomorrow the question suddenly becomes an edge, the other part will wake up conscience and honor?
          For those riches they will sell anyone
          1. Vadim Krymov
            Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 16
            -7
            Yes, it's hard to disagree with you...
        3. tatra
          tatra 20 February 2022 10: 33
          0
          The oligarchs in Russia were made by the communists, who “surrendered” the USSR in 1991 without a fight.

          TO WHOM they surrendered to those who have been cowardly whining for 30 years that you have "nothing to do" with responsibility for your seizure of the RSFSR, and everything that you have done with Russia and the Russian people, but all these 30 years they boast, like all of you "and now it’s better than in the USSR under the communists, “because you got a lot of things at the expense of other people’s labor, ate fake Soviet products, wandered around the world?
          And who, after your capture of the RSFSR, together with the enemies of the communists in the West and in Europe, accuse Stalin of unleashing the Second World War, and threw all the Soviet citizens killed by the Nazis into "Stalin's victims"?
          1. Vadim Krymov
            Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 38
            -7
            Communists - MILLIONS of communists in the USSR! - in 1991 SAMI surrendered to the "enemy". Without a fight Surrendered like the last canal. And now they “blame the enemy” and the Martians for having surrendered. It's called schizophrenia...
            1. tatra
              tatra 20 February 2022 10: 42
              -1
              Ha, that is, you, the enemies of the communists, accuse the communists of not killing you, not repressing you during your Perestroika?
              And why are you not proud of your capture of the USSR, which you so longed for all 70 years under Soviet power, but cowardly shift the responsibility on those from whom you took the USSR away?
              Maybe because you yourself admit that you captured the USSR for criminal purposes - to the detriment of the country and people?
              1. Vadim Krymov
                Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 08
                -8
                Did you protect your USSR from criminals? No... That's all your "heroism"...
                1. tatra
                  tatra 20 February 2022 11: 17
                  -3
                  That is, do you admit that the enemies of the communists who seized the USSR and divided them into their own separate States are criminals?
                  Thanks for the proof.
                  1. Vadim Krymov
                    Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 20
                    -8
                    And those who sold and betrayed their homeland, the USSR, are not criminals? To health…
                    1. tatra
                      tatra 20 February 2022 11: 21
                      -1
                      Then, by analogy, for you, Nicholas II is the one who betrayed and sold the Motherland?
                      Or, as is customary among the enemies of the communists, "and this is different"?
                      1. Vadim Krymov
                        Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 45
                        -8
                        You answer for yourself, "hero of the world revolution" ...
            2. parusnik
              parusnik 20 February 2022 11: 20
              +3
              Communists - MILLIONS of communists in the USSR! - in 1991 SAMI surrendered to the "enemy". Without a fight Surrendered like the last canal. And now they “blame the enemy” and the Martians for having surrendered. It's called schizophrenia...
              And you, apparently, have gone underground since then and are waging a merciless war with the oligarchs. laughing
              1. Vadim Krymov
                Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 11: 44
                -8
                Underground?! As one smart person said - "only rats live in the underground" ... Do you remember - there were such "underground Bolsheviks"?
                1. parusnik
                  parusnik 20 February 2022 14: 58
                  0
                  It is clear that you are from the "rats", who are now in power. smile
                  1. Vadim Krymov
                    Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 17: 58
                    -2
                    If the rats are in power, in your words, then who are you - "podryatnik"? Or are you a "fighter of the invisible front"?
                    1. parusnik
                      parusnik 20 February 2022 21: 19
                      +1
                      You surrendered yourself a fighter laughing
                      1. Vadim Krymov
                        Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 21: 30
                        -3
                        Can you say something meaningful? And then: "rats", "authorities", "underground", "fighter" ... And he himself, with his cleverness, "has fun with a smiley face" ... You are a cool specimen ...
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. svp67
      svp67 20 February 2022 10: 06
      +2
      Quote: Vadim Krymov
      Because those planning to “win” promised to put Russian oligarchs “in the Kremlin” as overseers of Russian citizens

      Oh, I don’t think, there’s a fight going on for this “sweet spot” ... Poles, all sorts of Balts, and even Great Ukrainians claim it
      1. Vadim Krymov
        Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 11
        -9
        The colonial status of the "economy" requires a colonial "entourage" of infrastructure. So to say that "the picture was oil" ...
    5. Thrifty
      Thrifty 20 February 2022 10: 10
      +2
      There is no one to sit down at the negotiating table with! Thugs and baboons in human difference understand only brute force. Enough already to pour from empty to empty, it's time to just smash these vsu to dust.
    6. tkoh
      tkoh 20 February 2022 10: 32
      0
      And now it's like we're not working hard? To the common people there is no difference who is in power.
      1. VORON538
        VORON538 20 February 2022 10: 53
        -4
        Are you dreaming about Bavarian sausages, a free allowance and a hard hand of a foreign owner?
        1. tkoh
          tkoh 20 February 2022 12: 00
          0
          So now, with a pick in our hands, we extract resources and drive them to the west. The oligarchy and those in power are fattening on this, but we have a minimum wage!
      2. Vadim Krymov
        Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 10: 57
        -1
        No difference?! What, and "the Nazis would arrange"?
        1. tkoh
          tkoh 20 February 2022 12: 04
          -2
          You would still remember the Golden Horde. And what is the difference between Western capitalism and domestic? Why are Western oligarchs worse than their local ones?
          1. Vadim Krymov
            Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 18: 00
            -3
            You are no better...
            1. tkoh
              tkoh 20 February 2022 18: 17
              -1
              And it seems to you that scraps from the master's began to fall, since there is such a huge difference for you
              1. Vadim Krymov
                Vadim Krymov 20 February 2022 20: 39
                -5
                What snacks? What table? Are you in the right state of mind?
    7. Shuev
      Shuev 20 February 2022 10: 59
      -3
      The British Prime Minister said about the risks of Russia to unleash the "biggest war in Europe since 1914"
      Empire Wings (2017)

      Rasputin repeatedly tried to dissuade the emperor from the participation of the state in hostilities.


      Chef of Lenin and Stalin Professor of Potions

      Master 007 and Bloody Mary
  2. svp67
    svp67 20 February 2022 10: 03
    +2
    According to Johnson, Moscow has already begun "the implementation of the plan to invade Ukraine"
    Still, she has already "captured" the Voronezh and Rostov regions
  3. Livonetc
    Livonetc 20 February 2022 10: 06
    -1
    ]"
    "Ugh on you.
    Pah on you again."
    1. tralflot1832
      tralflot1832 20 February 2022 10: 15
      +6
      It is necessary to correct it with the date of the war not from 1945, but from 1939. And immediately Borka will have incontinence in the lower holes.
    2. Alex Nevs
      Alex Nevs 20 February 2022 10: 58
      0
      This is a miracle a couple of times the floor changed EXACTLY!
  4. 210ox
    210ox 20 February 2022 10: 06
    +5
    The biggest war in Europe has already been unleashed. in Yugoslavia. You, moreover. And if something happens in Ukraine now, then only peace enforcement.
  5. kostavit
    kostavit 20 February 2022 10: 08
    +1
    We urgently need to send peacekeepers to the Donbass. Procrastination is like death!
  6. tralflot1832
    tralflot1832 20 February 2022 10: 08
    -1
    I have only one question for Johnson? Is the UK ready to fight a nuclear power for Ukraine? If not, then let it shut up. It can be agreed that the glazing of the northern hemisphere will be the only way out of the situation.
  7. Amateur
    Amateur 20 February 2022 10: 09
    +2
    Why only in Europe? The islanders will not sit out this time. Like their "cousins" overseas.
    Or do they hope that Russian "Russians" will fight with Russian "Ukrainians"?
  8. Egoza
    Egoza 20 February 2022 10: 09
    0
    What naive people! "Russia's risks of unleashing a major war ..." Don't you want to calculate the risks of Britain? Or did Britain leave the EU and it will not "arrive"?
    1. sabakina
      sabakina 20 February 2022 11: 04
      -1
      Elena, I don't understand at all why the WB cares about EU problems? She's a mutt, she's a mutt...
  9. Andrei Nikolaevich
    Andrei Nikolaevich 20 February 2022 10: 10
    -2
    I think that before this visit, Zelensky sniffed well. Carries him lightly. Hysteria and complete misunderstanding of the surrounding reality.
  10. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 20 February 2022 10: 11
    +2
    The fact is that by all indications, the plan has already begun in some sense (...) can really become the biggest war in Europe since 1945 only in terms of scale

    Johnson Truss, people who don't have a decent high school education. Any sane person knows that all the great wars in the world have been started by Britain, or instigated and started with the filing of the same Britain. The Crimean War, the First World War and the Second World War, everything passed with a handout and with the participation of Britain. Well, about the various seizures of territories there, on reading from the Rokkol rock and further - India. North America, Australia and New Zealand, and if I list further, I will sort out all the limits not for comments, but for the VO article.
  11. Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 20 February 2022 10: 11
    +4
    Well, yes, "Ukraine tse Europe"! They are doing everything to ensure that this war takes place, but only within the framework of Russia-Ukraine. Why didn't you make it European in 30 years of independence? All efforts, from the Maidan to the unleashing of a civil war, were directed not only against Russia, but also against Ukraine itself, which at that time was quite independent economically. They plundered, ruined and overlaid with unsustainable debts, and Russia is to blame. I'm to blame for not giving them a hand in 2014! And about this, eight years ago, many pragmatic politicians and the military warned.
  12. rocket757
    rocket757 20 February 2022 10: 12
    +4
    The British Prime Minister said about the risks of Russia to unleash the "biggest war in Europe since 1945"
    With impudence, everything is clear ... it doesn’t matter who premiers there, it’s still a church or a Borusik, there can be no other.
    1. cniza
      cniza 20 February 2022 12: 08
      +2
      For several centuries, they have not changed ...
      1. rocket757
        rocket757 20 February 2022 12: 32
        +1
        Now there is only one definition - impudent, this is the ENEMY, if he himself cannot, then he will mischief for anyone!
        1. cniza
          cniza 20 February 2022 13: 11
          +3
          Not just an enemy, but very rotten and vile, not shunning any methods ...
          1. rocket757
            rocket757 20 February 2022 13: 22
            +1
            For the most part, everyone is...
            Just impudent, initiator, organizers ... experienced. It's even worse.
            1. cniza
              cniza 20 February 2022 13: 32
              +3
              Yes, they have a lot of experience in such affairs that some of them get sick ...
  13. Troll
    Troll 20 February 2022 10: 21
    +3
    If it starts, and the West intervenes, then it may outgrow. There is a risk, yes.

    In general, history is written by the winner, and if Russia "loses" and fails to achieve its political goals, then yes, it will be to blame. And if he wins, then the Ukrainian authorities will be guilty of unleashing.
    1. Alex Nevs
      Alex Nevs 20 February 2022 11: 02
      -1
      There is no risk. Remember this. Supreme mattress resting on the laurels of everything! the world will be overwhelmed by more than one Kennedy, just so as not to lose laurels because of some 404. 2008 is an example.
  14. Lech from Android.
    Lech from Android. 20 February 2022 10: 26
    0
    The British Prime Minister does not think about the risks of Britain itself in provoking this very war.
    But the Anglo-Saxons may be in the place of Hitler.
  15. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 20 February 2022 10: 38
    +3
    Britain has already set new deadlines.
    What remains to be done? Only postpone the deadlines and continue the information war, so that the word Russia sounds every minute exclusively with frightening and offensive epithets. They say that this shaggy "eccentric" was a good journalist, but listening to him raises big doubts.
  16. RESEARCHER
    RESEARCHER 20 February 2022 10: 40
    +2
    If war is inevitable, England must be the first to perish.
    1. Alex Nevs
      Alex Nevs 20 February 2022 11: 03
      0
      I wrote above. There will be no war.
  17. riwas
    riwas 20 February 2022 10: 54
    +2
    The British Prime Minister said about the risks of Russia to unleash the "biggest war in Europe since 1945"

    This is not a risk, but the calculation of the West to start a war in the Donbass and the escalation is already underway. The United States and Great Britain desperately need a war between Ukraine and Russia, and they will do anything to make it happen.
  18. evgen1221
    evgen1221 20 February 2022 11: 08
    0
    According to American intelligence (for the media and people), it is already perceived as according to the research of British scientists. Through closed channels, we can do something sensible, but as in the media, there is only one bunch.
  19. Valery Mayorov
    Valery Mayorov 20 February 2022 11: 10
    -2
    Scoundrel, did we start World War II? USSR=Germany?
  20. Ross xnumx
    Ross xnumx 20 February 2022 11: 11
    +1
    The British Prime Minister said about the risks of Russia to unleash the "biggest war in Europe since 1945"

    Blame everything on Russia - you are no stranger to it. Just do not forget that it is unlikely that you will be able to sit out behind the straits, seas and oceans ...
  21. Wolf
    Wolf 20 February 2022 11: 15
    0
    What would stupid Boris Johnson know, this major war in Europe since 1938 was started by Bill Clinton and his fellow countryman Tony Blair in 1999 with the bombing of the Serbs in support of all the criminal terrorist organizations of NATO and the presidents of their country. Then they continued on their own in 2014. Maidan in the outskirts.
    THANKS TO THE GOVERNERS OF RUSSIA and THE WISE POLICY OF PUTIN AND THE TEAM, this invented war of RUSSIA AGAINST RUSSIA from the side of NATO TERRORISTS HAVEN'T STARTED AS A CONTINUATION OF MIDAN 2014, AND THE NEW BRONSHTEIN (ZELENSKI) DID NOT HAVE TO COMPLETE THEIR TASK!!!
    A simple question for whom is the war of the RUSSIANS AGAINST the RUSSIANS NECESSARY? Rusami or ZLOCHINACHKOY NATO ORGANIZATION? And everything is on the face, on THEIR LODGES AND DECEPTIONS AND FURTHER ONLY DE ...... LI !!!
    And I hope that THE GOVODE WILL GIVE SUCH ANSWER THAT LONDON AND WASHINGTON WILL NOT BE FROM THE WORLD MAP !!!
    LIVE Were!!!
  22. Fisherman
    Fisherman 20 February 2022 11: 21
    -2
    Children's order: "Whoever hurts something - he talks about it."
    Adult proverb: "The thief shouts the loudest" catch the thief!
  23. rusich
    rusich 20 February 2022 11: 32
    -1
    What smart two clowns can say. One impudent Saxon, the second pan-headed
  24. ZeeD
    ZeeD 20 February 2022 11: 41
    -2
    Something once again Russia is forwarding everyone with the start of the war ...
    Isn't it Minor Britain, our specialist in all sorts of high-likes and provocations, is acting weird under the thoughtful conducting of the United States?
  25. BABAY22
    BABAY22 20 February 2022 11: 57
    +7
    So British intelligence pulled up ...
  26. cniza
    cniza 20 February 2022 12: 07
    +2
    British Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced Russia's "plans" to "encircle Kiev"


    Why surround him?
  27. Viktor Sergeev
    Viktor Sergeev 20 February 2022 13: 25
    0
    There is a risk that Russia will end the biggest war in Europe after 1945.
  28. Yuri Siritsky_2
    Yuri Siritsky_2 20 February 2022 13: 30
    -1
    If he combed his hair in the morning, then after a head massage he might not repeat the stupidity of his American boss.
  29. Berg berg
    Berg berg 20 February 2022 13: 33
    0
    Unleash a war such as America and England and their henchmen Zeli. , and the great Russia ends the war!
  30. sen
    sen 20 February 2022 14: 18
    +1
    The British Prime Minister said about the risks of Russia to unleash the "biggest war in Europe since 1945"

    British dreams out loud. Russia will never go to a "big" war. Teaching a lesson to the Armed Forces of Ukraine if they attack the Donbass is another matter.
  31. infantrefir
    infantrefir 20 February 2022 19: 07
    0
    You can’t argue about the Anglo-Saxons specialists (initiating wars) on this issue.
  32. sanya_sergant
    sanya_sergant 20 February 2022 22: 55
    +7
    At the same time, neither the British Prime Minister nor the American President provide any evidence ....
    It seems that the word "evidence" is completely absent from their vocabulary.
  33. Diviz
    Diviz 21 February 2022 00: 35
    0
    So order yourself a Seabass and hurry up.
  34. zar-valerij
    zar-valerij 21 February 2022 22: 57
    0
    And who is going to participate in this war? Isn't Johnson himself?