Military Review

The military tested a new version of the loitering ammunition "Lancet-3" in Syria

70

Basic version "Lancet-3"


A deeply modernized version of the Lancet loitering ammunition has been created in Russia, the kamikaze drone has already passed the necessary tests, including in Syria.

The new version of the "Lancet" differs from the base model with "updated aerodynamics" - the drone was equipped with one large X-shaped wing and an X-shaped plumage in the tail section, while the previous model had two symmetrical X-shaped wings. In addition, the modernized "Lancet-3" received a warhead of increased power, as well as an increased range and duration of flight. The characteristics of the drone are not disclosed, on the website of the developer company there is information only on the base model.

However, the military-diplomatic source, whose words are referred to RIA News, said that the military had already tested a new version of the Lancet-3 loitering ammunition in Syria. Whether the tests of the upgraded version of the loitering munition have been completed or are ongoing, the source did not explain.

As part of the tests, a new version of the Lancet-3 loitering ammunition was used several times by Russian military units against terrorist positions in Syria

- he said.

The basic version of the UAV "Lancet-3" has a takeoff weight of 12 kg, while the weight of the warhead is 3 kg, which is reflected in the name of the UAV. The drone develops a speed of 80 to 110 km / h and can hit targets within a radius of 40 km from the operator. For guidance, three systems are used: coordinate, with the help of optoelectronic means and combined. The drone is equipped with a television channel that transmits an image of the target and allows you to confirm its defeat. The fuse is pre-contact.
70 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Skipper
    Skipper 18 February 2022 08: 29
    +27
    The thing is definitely awesome. We are not far behind Israel. In appearance, he reminds me of someone ... an earthen pig .. he is an aardvark or aardvark - the best digger in the world .. lives in Africa where the Maasai tribe lives. Ancient creature comes from dinosaurs. In Russia, the first two individuals appeared in 2011. It digs a hole 5 meters deep in 5 minutes.
    [media = http: //]
    1. neri73-r
      neri73-r 18 February 2022 08: 47
      +12
      Such a good pig, you need to fit the Hohlaband to dig caches! wassat
      1. fruc
        fruc 18 February 2022 12: 45
        +6
        "Lancet-3" was used several times by units of the Russian military on the positions of terrorists in Syria

        I think that in order to consolidate confidence in the reliability of the product, you can test it at national battalions and firing points of ukrov.
      2. alystan
        alystan 18 February 2022 15: 41
        +2
        They will let them into the fat first. They themselves are masters of digging, yet they know about it.
    2. APASUS
      APASUS 18 February 2022 08: 56
      +10
      Quote: Skipper
      The thing is definitely awesome. Keeping up with Israel

      The thing is, of course, awesome, but we are lagging behind Israel and even China. The fact is that the Lancet UAV models do not fold wings and there is no possibility of launching from a container. This is how China does
      1. JPD
        JPD 18 February 2022 09: 02
        +12
        That's just the radius of action there, well, no matter how 40 km)
        1. And Us Rat
          And Us Rat 18 February 2022 15: 27
          -1
          Quote from JPV
          That's just the radius of action there, well, no matter how 40 km)

          Just 40 :)
          A direct analogue of the third Lancet is the Hero-120. The same 40 km radius, only the warhead is a little heavier - 4.5kg.

          1. bovi
            bovi 18 February 2022 17: 21
            +1
            this is not a chinese waffle, be respectful
      2. Flooding
        Flooding 18 February 2022 09: 19
        +6
        Quote: APASUS
        This is how China is doing

        this is a great and logical solution
        but for a smaller "caliber"
        1. APASUS
          APASUS 18 February 2022 11: 34
          +4
          Quote: Flood
          Quote: APASUS
          This is how China is doing

          this is a great and logical solution
          but for a smaller "caliber"

          IAI Harop is even larger than the Lancet-3 UAV and launches from a container
          1. neri73-r
            neri73-r 18 February 2022 14: 58
            +1
            Quote: APASUS
            IAI Harop is even larger than the Lancet-3 UAV and launches from a container

            This is not a question for the product itself, but for the launcher and control system. Folding wings are not such a big problem for our industry, but you can make a launch container where you do not need to fold the wings.
      3. Johnson Smithson
        Johnson Smithson 18 February 2022 09: 25
        +11
        they have a range of only 15 km and a mass less
  2. Nikolay1987
    Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 08: 36
    -31
    received a combat unit of increased power

    Wow, is this an analogue of the word power? Or explosive power?
    1. Pivot
      Pivot 18 February 2022 08: 44
      +37
      In artillery, this definition characterizes the power of the charge, for many years, but don’t worry on the EG, you won’t get such a question.
      1. Nikolay1987
        Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 08: 47
        -50
        Yes, they didn’t tell me about this at the institute either, probably because I didn’t graduate from a military academy. But this is not important, the main thing is that the powerful gunners, when their time comes, do not crap. And they can call their shells whatever they want.
        1. Pivot
          Pivot 18 February 2022 09: 13
          +22
          Well, you can complete the task and crap yourself. But how the wits will behave during the database is a question? Will they run in columns of refugees with women and children, explaining their cowardice by the fact that this was not taught at the institute?
          1. Alexfly
            Alexfly 19 February 2022 12: 44
            -2
            Decided to lay down with bones? The flag is for you ..... Sometimes you need to regroup to inflict more damage on the enemy ...
            1. Pivot
              Pivot 19 February 2022 14: 16
              +1
              You mean regroup in a column with refugees? Such a regrouping will not cause damage to the enemy.
              1. Alexfly
                Alexfly 20 February 2022 15: 51
                0
                What are you talking about, dear?
                1. Pivot
                  Pivot 20 February 2022 15: 54
                  0
                  What are you talking about? Decided to lay down with bones? The flag is for you ..... Sometimes you need to regroup to inflict more damage on the enemy ...
        2. Alexander Salenko
          Alexander Salenko 18 February 2022 09: 17
          +6
          You were dipped into your own illiteracy, I also graduated from a civilian university, but I don’t allow such mistakes.
          1. Nikolay1987
            Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 09: 52
            -19
            You were dipped into your own illiteracy, I also graduated from a civilian university, but I don’t allow such mistakes.


            I forgot that you can't "crap" here.
            1. Alexander Salenko
              Alexander Salenko 19 February 2022 08: 06
              0
              You can, otherwise it would be boring, thanks for the fun.
          2. valera75
            valera75 19 February 2022 13: 17
            0
            I didn’t graduate from universities and didn’t know about power, which means you can also throw shit at me gentlemen, clever ones. I didn’t know that people on this resource are trying to humiliate people for this.
            1. Alexander Salenko
              Alexander Salenko 20 February 2022 14: 50
              0
              So you didn’t show off, what kind of complex? Not knowing is not a shame, but not knowing and showing off is another thing entirely.
            2. Nikolay1987
              Nikolay1987 20 February 2022 20: 53
              0
              You see, here it is necessary to respectfully ask, otherwise you will damage the psyche of the unbalanced aksakals of the forum.
      2. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx 18 February 2022 09: 48
        +5
        Quote: Pivot
        In artillery this definition characterizes the charge power, for many years, but do not worry on the EG you will not get such a question.

        One should not casually humiliate a person with ignorance of Anglicisms ... In Russian, the word "power" is 1. outdated. ability to act; potential. 2. great strength and power. 3. conquering force, irresistible influence, the influence of something.
        Also, power - it is rather a relationship between people, the ability of one person to force another to do his will.
        Concerning
        The power of ammunition - an indicator of the effectiveness of its action at the goal. For example, the power of high-explosive projectiles is determined by the area of ​​the destruction zone; armor-piercing - the thickness of the pierced armor at a given angle of impact; fragmentation - the area of ​​​​the reduced zone of fragmentation, determined by the number, mass and speed of expansion of the fragments; for all projectiles - the probability of hitting the target.
        Glossary of military terms. - M .: Military Publishing House. A. M. Plekhov, S. G. Shapkin. 1988
        Now we look at the definition of power.
        Power - this is a physical quantity that shows the speed of work and is equal to the ratio of work to the time for which this work is performed. Since energy is converted when doing work, we can assume that power characterizes the rate of energy conversion.
        In English, all these characteristics and meanings are indicated by one word - : strength, energy, power, power, energy, power, power ...
        ***
        In my opinion, power is the most correct name ... But, according to the understanding of many Russian “effective scientists”, this sounds rustic, archaic ... Whether it’s a matter of power ... The most interesting thing is that there are even units of measurement for this quality. ..
        Akin to "loud-sounding": manager, provider, merchandiser...
        ***
        At this stage, the reasoning can be ended with the words from the joke about inertia:
        And in our opinion, in Russian it is ... called.
        hi
        1. Demon_is_ada
          Demon_is_ada 18 February 2022 13: 33
          +1
          Well, it's not just a play on words, it's a generalized expression. If you try to give a precise definition, then the ability to influence the target in order to damage or destroy it. As an example, the power of remotely detonated shells of 30 mm caliber against infantry, approximately 80 mm mine. And when smoking out of the trenches, it is already comparable to howitzers. This is relatively everything, a purely engineering term
          hi
          1. Nikolay1987
            Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 13: 40
            +1
            What is the word efficiency not fit?
            1. Demon_is_ada
              Demon_is_ada 18 February 2022 15: 42
              +4
              In principle, it will do with the addition - for infantry, for infantry fighting vehicles, etc. This is a more capacious meaning, usually there is still ammunition, weight, barrel life, etc., etc. Power is more delineated ... Something like that, I didn’t come up with ...
              Using the lancet as an example, it may be more powerful, but less effective. wassat judging by the wings, control has deteriorated, it has become peculiar, the weight has increased - delivery was difficult, etc.
              Well, probably the engineers came up with for the humanities, so as not to give them a few sheets, anyway, for them it’s a flimsy letter
              hi
        2. White man
          White man 18 February 2022 15: 57
          -4
          so they took it and covered the running gap. By the argument: it's like an exciting woman, an exciting sea and an exciting chick, an exciting fart in a puddle
      3. And Us Rat
        And Us Rat 18 February 2022 19: 26
        +2
        Quote: Pivot
        In artillery, this definition characterizes the power of the charge, for many years

        For the first time I saw a similar characteristic in the media about 10 years ago, like "now this will be accepted", instead of the definition of "ammunition power". It still hurts the ear.

        The literal dictionary meaning of the word "Power" is social/religious/political power expressed by forceful methods, a demonstration of the power of coercion.
        And physical processes, such as a chemical reaction, or energy exchange in its course, are determined by "Power".

        So, in my understanding, this is a sad example of how illiteracy becomes the rule for the sake of a "red word". Wretched.
        1. Pivot
          Pivot 18 February 2022 19: 39
          +1
          Back in 1991, the army used the term projectile power
          1. Alexfly
            Alexfly 20 February 2022 15: 54
            -1
            In 1991, they used the term projectile power, don't get pissed off ..
      4. Alexfly
        Alexfly 20 February 2022 15: 53
        0
        Power - in fact, the word used in artillery has been archaic since the 19th century ... No need to explain, I hope, the meaning of this?
    2. den3080
      den3080 18 February 2022 08: 47
      -30
      Quote: Nikolay1987
      received a combat unit of increased power

      Wow, is this an analogue of the word power? Or explosive power?

      Also amused.
      the author, apparently, had seen enough of "The Lord of the Rings" with "Harry Potter" in half.
      1. OgnennyiKotik
        OgnennyiKotik 18 February 2022 08: 56
        +29
        Quote: den3080
        Also amused.

        Hmm ... Maybe the words army, projectile, bullet, company, target, etc. are fun?
        The author uses the usual term, which is known to everyone who is somehow related to military affairs.
        It can only cause laughter in people whose knowledge of the world is based on The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter.
      2. Nikolay1987
        Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 09: 35
        -25
        they probably think that the physicist nerds have the power, and the power is for the cool kids. Power, power .... my charm)))
      3. The comment was deleted.
    3. aszzz888
      aszzz888 18 February 2022 08: 55
      +9

      Nikolay1987
      Today, 08: 36
      +1
      received a combat unit of increased power

      Wow, is this an analogue of the word power? Or explosive power?

      The power of ammunition
      The ability of projectiles, warheads of missiles, air bombs, mines and other munitions in nuclear and conventional equipment to cause damage of the required level to the object of destruction (target); characterizes their action at the target. .. . The indicator M.b. can serve as the area of ​​the affected area (its average value is the area of ​​the reduced affected area) or the radius of the reduced zone. Sufficiently complete reflection of M.b. finds in the coordinate law the defeat of the object, i.e. depending on the conditional probability of hitting a point target on the distance between the target and the epicenter of the explosion. M.b. is a property of the projectile-target system. A projectile of the same power has little power when it hits a heavily protected target and more power when it hits a weakly protected target. M.b. can change in time if the security of the target in the process of exposure changes.
      something like this.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. aszzz888
          aszzz888 18 February 2022 08: 58
          +6

          Nikolay1987
          Today, 08: 57
          NEW

          0
          Thank you, I know the definition of the word - power, just never heard of its use in this vein.
          To know EVERYTHING is by definition impossible.
      2. Nikolay1987
        Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 09: 14
        -11
        A projectile of the same power has low power when it hits a heavily protected target and more power when it hits a weakly protected target.

        In addition, the modernized "Lancet-3" received a warhead of increased power

        The power of the warhead has increased!
        The basic version of the UAV "Lancet-3" has a takeoff weight of 12 kg, while the mass of the warhead is 3 kg, which is reflected in the name of the UAV

        If it happens that power not increases from an increase in the power of the warhead, then maybe the product itself is not intended for this purpose? or power is not correct.
        In my opinion, the word power is the word parasite.
        1) The power of the warhead is not enough to hit the target.
        2) The power of the warhead is not enough power to hit the target.
      3. Ross xnumx
        Ross xnumx 18 February 2022 10: 00
        +1
        Quote: aszzz888
        something like this.

        Still to understand in what units it is "M.b." measured ... Because, one thing is a nuclear weapon with a capacity of 10 kt, and another with the power of 75% of Hiroshima ...
        What if it turns out that this power is in fact an ordinary forgotten power?
        1. Nikolay1987
          Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 10: 14
          -6
          I would also like to clarify in what units it is "M.b." measured

          Let's try to think logically. What is power? According to military terms, this is striking power, conquering force, irresistible impact. Where does it come from? Explosion - Rapid physical or physico-chemical a process that takes place with a significant release of energy in a small volume in a short period of time and leading to shock, vibration and thermal effects on the environment due to the high-speed expansion of the explosion products. An explosion in a solid medium causes destruction and crushing.
          Who needs to remember the power formula?!)
          1. Ross xnumx
            Ross xnumx 18 February 2022 10: 26
            +1
            Quote: Nikolay1987
            Who needs to remember the formula for power?!

            Let's just be glad that Russia has learned to produce "Lancets" of various powers so that we are not accused of flooding ...
            hi
            1. Nikolay1987
              Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 10: 29
              -10
              Yes, let them be accused of anything, even banned, I'm just wondering, people here know how to think, reason, or just throw poop from behind their fence.
              1. And Us Rat
                And Us Rat 18 February 2022 19: 40
                +1
                Quote: Nikolay1987
                I'm just wondering, we people know how to think, reason

                The question is relevant for the entire population of the planet.
                Alas, man is a CONDITIONALLY rational being, since more than 80% of mankind consider the thought process in general and critical thinking in particular to be burdensome. Therefore, they readily delegate this function to anyone, from the church to the media and politicians. In order not to be too distracted from satiating their animal needs. request
                1. Nikolay1987
                  Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 19: 52
                  0
                  Yes, you can tell with a smart look that you need to hit the sparrows with a cannonball, and you will be laughed at with buckshot on the building, but because of the word of a synonym, some individuals are so desperate to prove their case here ?!
                  I immediately remembered how I was crucified for the word "swim", instead of "walk".
                  I hope (no) you (warriors) are so correct in life, but otherwise you should be ashamed.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                  2. Gust
                    Gust 19 February 2022 23: 18
                    +3
                    Each profession, industry, discipline has its own glossary, quite official, used in scientific literature, not counting any slang words, etc. "Power" is quite officially used as a generalized characteristic of increasing the destructive effect of ammunition on a target. The growth of power is achieved in different ways - by increasing the charge of explosives, using explosives with increased brisance and / or explosiveness, changing the principle of destruction (water hammer, shock core, etc.).
                    I understand that omniscience is impossible, but pride from ignorance is something new...
                    1. Nikolay1987
                      Nikolay1987 20 February 2022 21: 56
                      0
                      I understand that omniscience is impossible, but pride from ignorance is something new...

                      Yes, there will be even more of you here the same "proud" of ours. Comrade Pivot will not let you lie, he also collected statistics with 36 likes for us. He thinks that
                      this definition characterizes the charge power

                      those. a non-specific (generalized) characteristic characterizes a completely specific one. I don't even know whose ignorance is worse. Mine or a person who "did not take the EG".
                      Okay, the main thing is to know that "to direct the dangerous end towards the enemy."
          2. tikhonov66
            tikhonov66 18 February 2022 13: 01
            -1
            "...
            Who needs to remember the power formula?!)
            ..."
            - the CONCEPT "power" has no formula,
            but there is a definition...
            - (mechanical) Power is the speed at which a physical body performs mechanical work
            - or mechanical work performed by a physical body per unit of time
            1. The comment was deleted.
          3. Demon_is_ada
            Demon_is_ada 18 February 2022 15: 52
            +1
            For the COP, the use of blasting explosives makes it more powerful for armored targets compared to TNT, but TNT will have more power with equal plus or minus armor penetration. In short, in fact, debauchery, a general evaluation criterion
  3. Nikolaevich I
    Nikolaevich I 18 February 2022 08: 55
    0
    That is, an X-shaped wing and an X-shaped tail? Such a description is terribly reminiscent of an overseas apparatus ... and, in my opinion, Israeli!
    1. neri73-r
      neri73-r 18 February 2022 09: 00
      +10
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      That is, an X-shaped wing and an X-shaped tail? Such a description is terribly reminiscent of an overseas apparatus ... and, in my opinion, Israeli!
      The laws of aerodynamics are the same for everyone.
      1. Nikolaevich I
        Nikolaevich I 18 February 2022 09: 44
        -5
        Quote: neri73-r
        The laws of aerodynamics are the same for everyone.

        These laws have been known for a long time ... why didn't they choose this scheme from the beginning, which seems to be the best, but chose the "two symmetrical X" scheme?
        1. neri73-r
          neri73-r 18 February 2022 09: 56
          +4
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          Quote: neri73-r
          The laws of aerodynamics are the same for everyone.

          These laws have been known for a long time ... why didn't they choose this scheme from the beginning, which seems to be the best, but chose the "two symmetrical X" scheme?

          And experience, the son of difficult mistakes, ........ (c)
          1. bovi
            bovi 18 February 2022 17: 53
            0
            there is another question about UAVs: what is more important - the experience of applying past concepts or the actual electronics that implement these concepts at some technical level.
    2. tikhonov66
      tikhonov66 18 February 2022 13: 06
      +1
      "...
      Such a description is terribly reminiscent of an overseas apparatus.
      ..."
      everything looks like something...
      Hedgehog - in needles.
      Elka too.
      (S.Ya. Marshak is a funny alphabet.)

      Willows rustle on the mountain,
      A bee is ringing on the willow,
      Striped like a zebra.

      Into our boat sometimes
      Water is gathering
      In the depths a star floats
      Silver like a fish.

      In the grove - maples and oaks,
      And under them there are mushrooms,
      Each mushroom is like an umbrella.

      A young month has come out,
      The sky looks like water
      The cloud looks like a wave
      Month-boat wooden...
      (Yunna Moritz. What does it look like)

      8-)))
  4. riwas
    riwas 18 February 2022 09: 14
    +5
    The military tested a new version of the loitering ammunition "Lancet-3" in Syria

    The question is how many we have. For a good mess, you need a massive application.

    Russian komikaze Lancet-3 drone strikes militants in Syria
    1. Nikolay1987
      Nikolay1987 18 February 2022 09: 42
      -1
      komikaze

      коmikaze)))))
      1. riwas
        riwas 18 February 2022 09: 44
        +4
        komikaze))))

        I'm sorry. I copied the phrase from YouTube, did not check it.
  5. Barberry25
    Barberry25 18 February 2022 09: 29
    +1
    that's good .. the next step is a full-fledged cumulative fragmentation warhead. A warhead from an RPG-3 with a penetration of 7 mm and fragmentation rings will just fit in 500 kilos - a universal UAV will turn out
  6. senima56
    senima56 18 February 2022 10: 03
    +2
    It's good that the performance has been improved. I wonder if the problem of the sound of this ammunition was solved? In previous comments on the use of these drones, the phrase was often heard: "The militants, having heard the sound of an approaching ammunition, (rushed in different directions, tried to take cover, etc.)" That was the lack of "Lancet-1" and "Lancet- 3"! hi
    1. Barberry25
      Barberry25 19 February 2022 16: 17
      0
      it’s unlikely, it’s difficult to hide an electric motor .. but in the conditions of, say, a battle, you won’t hear it because you’ll already be deaf .. in principle, you can raise the UAV to a great height, but then you need to put better optics .. Or, as an option, do the gliding ammunition mode by turning off the engine when diving
  7. VicktorVR
    VicktorVR 18 February 2022 10: 07
    +1
    Probably not cheap, blow up thermal imagers. The goal must be relevant.
    1. tikhonov66
      tikhonov66 18 February 2022 13: 09
      0
      "...
      Probably not cheap, blow up thermal imagers.
      ..."
      - if you do a LOT - it can turn out cheaper ...
      1. Pivot
        Pivot 18 February 2022 14: 27
        +2
        Well, this is how to look. He took off himself, he scouted himself, he destroyed it. Or earlier, a reconnaissance aircraft flew out, spotted a target, an attack aircraft or a bomber flew out and worked out the target. Now we estimate the man-hours of flight personnel, then the cost of working time for 2 aircraft + the risk of falling under anti-aircraft fire, so what is cheaper in the end?
        1. bovi
          bovi 18 February 2022 17: 42
          0
          KMK here is not about "he scouted", but about remote guidance, i.e. it is a remote-controlled mine with aerial maneuver. In other words, it looks like a loitering BP, but it's still a past concept: a suicide bomber.
        2. Rusticolus
          Rusticolus 18 February 2022 19: 41
          -1
          so which is cheaper?
          Television in general is a specific thing. Target selection, redirection, and even identification. If you try to shift all this to automatic systems, then their cost can easily turn out to be even higher. If the task is simpler, to destroy everything that moves in a given area, then television is not necessary there either. But then again, if confirmation of destruction is not needed.
  8. Spkrdctr
    Spkrdctr 18 February 2022 21: 21
    0
    It only takes one year to attach folding fenders and make a box launcher for a truck. Now that the basic hut plane is ready, it's easy to finish it. It looks like a very good ammo and is probably much cheaper than the Israeli version.
  9. eehnie
    eehnie 19 February 2022 14: 54
    -1
    This is a technology under development. And every step forward is positive.

    In general, I tend to think that ammo in standard formats will have an edge in the long run. And loitering suicide combat drones are conceptually ammunition.

    For example, container launch platforms for suicidal combat drones look like a useful and practical development with a future. But the problem with this would be the cost of producing specific launchers and ammunition.

    Given that suicidal combat drones are conceptually munitions, and that container launchers make practical sense, it is highly likely that all work on suicidal combat drones will eventually lead to new munition variants in the form of suicidal combat unmanned aerial vehicles to be launched from existing standard multiple rocket launchers, artillery systems and tanks. In the case of Russia, most likely, new ammunition options will be created for the BM-21, BM-27, BM-30, as well as for calibers 122 mm, 125 mm, 130 mm, 152 mm, 203 mm and 240 mm, with the functions combat unmanned aerial vehicles and various ranges.

    The benefits of including suicidal combat drones in the standard caliber system are clear.

    On the other hand, the disposal of the project 2021 Vladimirets ship in 11451 led to the complete withdrawal of the project from the Russian Armed Forces. There are still 2 blocks of this project in Crimea, which Ukraine was not able to complete until 2014, and I would not rule out that they will be completed. Project 11451 would join the list of projects that the last units excluded for preservation at the museum level, if they were still present in the armed forces of Russia, Belarus, South Ossetia, Abkhazia and the Republics of Donetsk and Lugansk, would render the best service to protect all of them on the territory Syria and, as a result, are very likely to go to Syria in the short term:

    M-10 M-1938, ZIS-3, D-1, M-43, BS-3, D-44, M-30, M-160, (M)T-12, 61-K ZIK-3 M- 1939, 52-K KS-12 M-1939, A-19, ML-20, KS-19, D-48, S-60, ZPU-1/2/4, M-46, D-74, D- 20, ZU-23(/-2), S-125 SA-3, D-30, S-75 SA-2, S-200 SA-5, BM-13, BTR-40, BTR-152, BMD- 20, BM-24, MIG-15, BRDM-1, BM-14, PT-76, BTR-50, Strela-1 SA-9, BTR-60, BMD-1, SU-122, SU-100, T -34, Be-6/12, T-54/55/62, MiG-19, Yak-27, Su-9, Su-11, MiG-21, Yak-38, ZSU-57-2, 2K1 Mars FROG -2, 2K6 Luna FROG-3/5, Temp-S SS-12/22, Yak-28, Luna-M FROG-7, Su-15, Krug SA-4, 2K4 Filin FROG-1, AT-T, T-64, Project 1204, Project R5368, Project 1238/1283, Project T361, Project 1205, Project T389, Project 253L, Project 54U, Project 73K, Project 572, Project 255, Project 355, Project 254, Project T368, Project 151 , Project 264, Project 265, Project 12821, Project 1252, Project 317, Project 257/699/1253, Project 1328, Project 1332, Project 1256, Project 1338, Project 388, Project 1253( /1), Project 1206T, Project 12255 , Project 13000, Project 450, Project 189, Project 306, Project 188, Project770, Project 771, Project 106, Project 773, Project 1785, Project 1209, Project 904, Project 1206( /1), Project X-Bis, Project IX-Bis, Project 617, Project 613, Project 611, Project 633, Project 658, Project 659, Project 645, Project 627, Project 629, Project 651, Project 625, Project 661, Project 670, Project 705, Project 641, Project 685, Project 183R, Project 1240, Project 1141, Project 206MR, Project 205, Project ( /0)903( /7), Project 11451, Project 1190, Project 30, Project 68, Project 41, Project 56, Project 58, Project 41, Project 57, Project 1123, Project 1236, Project 1833, Project 159, Project 1134, Project 61/01090, Project 1159, Project 12421.

    (Automatically translated from English. Below is the original commentary in English)

    This is a technology under development. And every step forward is positive.

    In overall terms I tend to think that ammunition in standard formats will have an advantage in the long term. And loitering sucide combat UAVs are conceptually ammunition.

    As an example, the container launch platforms for loitering ammunition are looking a development useful and practical, with a future. But the problem with this would be in to build specific launchers and ammunition.

    Taking into account that loitering UAVs are conceptually ammunition, and that container launchers make sense in practical terms, it is very likely that all the work on loitering UAVs lead finally to the creation of new variants of ammunition, in the form of loitering UAVs, to be launched from current standard Multiple Rocket Launch Systems, artillery systems and tanks. In the case of Russia, it is likely to see the creation of new variants of ammunition for the BM-21, BM-27, BM-30, 122mm, 125mm, 130mm, 152mm, 203mm and 240mm calibers, with the loitering UAV features , and different ranges.

    The advantages of to include the loitering UAVs in the system of standard calibers are clear.

    In the other side, the disposal in 2021 of the Vladimirets of the Project 11451, caused the total exit of the project from the Russian Armed Forces. Still there are 2 units of this project in Crimea, that Ukraine was not able to finish, and I would not rule out to be finished. The Project 11451 would join the list of projects which last units out of museum level conservation, if present still in the armed forces of Russia, Belarus, South Ossetia, Abkhazia and the Republics of Donets and Lugansk, would make their best service to the defense of all them, in the territory of Syria, and as a consequence are very likely to go to Syria in the short-term:

    M-10 M-1938, ZIS-3, D-1, M-43, BS-3, D-44, M-30, M-160, (M)T-12, 61-K ZIK-3 M- 1939, 52-K KS-12 M-1939, A-19, ML-20, KS-19, D-48, S-60, ZPU-1/2/4, M-46, D-74, D- 20, ZU-23(/-2), S-125 SA-3, D-30, S-75 SA-2, S-200 SA-5, BM-13, BTR-40, BTR-152, BMD- 20, BM-24, MiG-15, BRDM-1, BM-14, PT-76, BTR-50, Strela-1 SA-9, BTR-60, BMD-1, SU-122, SU-100, T -34, Be-6/12, T-54/55/62, MiG-19, Yak-27, Su-9, Su-11, MiG-21, Yak-38, ZSU-57-2, 2K1 Mars FROG -2, 2K6 Luna FROG-3/5, Temp-S SS-12/22, Yak-28, Luna-M FROG-7, Su-15, Krug SA-4, 2K4 Filin FROG-1, AT-T, T-64, Project 1204, Project R5368, Project 1238/1283, Project T361, Project 1205, Project T389, Project 253L, Project 54U, Project 73K, Project 572, Project 255, Project 355, Project 254, Project T368, Project 151 , Project 264, Project 265, Project 12821, Project 1252, Project 317, Project 257/699/1253, Project 1328, Project 1332, Project 1256, Project 1338, Project 388, Project 1253( /1), Project 1206T, Project 12255 , Project 13000, Project 450, Project 189, Project 306, Project 188, Project 770, Project 771, Project 106, Project 773, Project 1785, Project 1209, Project 904, Project 1206( /1), Project X-Bis, Project IX-Bis, Project 617, Project 613, Project 611, Project 633, Project 658, Project 659, Project 645, Project 627, Project 629, Project 651, Project 625, Project 661, Project 670, Project 705, Project 641, Project 685, Project 183R, Project 1240, Project 1141, Project 206MR, Project 205, Project ( /0)903( /7), Project 11451, Project 1190, Project 30, Project 68, Project 41, Project 56,Project 58, Project 41, Project 57, Project 1123, Project 1236, Project 1833, Project 159, Project 1134, Project 61/01090, Project 1159, Project 12421.